DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Commission Regular Meeting Packet (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AGENDA Planning Commission City Council Chambers- Municipal Services Facility 3100 Belmont Blvd., West Richland Thursday, January 14, 2021 – 6:00 p.m. Planning Commission Chad Utecht, Chair Members: Nancy Aldrich, Vice Chair Michael Peterson Marv Bohling Jerry Surdyk Colton Brady Zach Byrnes Staff: Eric Mendenhall, Community Development Director Elisha Ransom, Associate Planner Tobie Webb, Staff Recorder Notice to the public: This meeting will be a remote Zoom meeting per Governor Jay Inslee’s Stay Home – Stay Healthy Directive. We encourage you to provide public comments on agenda items and public hearings in writing. If you want to provide public comments on any of the agenda items, please submit them in writing to [email protected] by 3:00pm Thursday, Janurary 14, 2021 to be read during the meeting. The Zoom meeting information is available on the City’s website or can be obtained by emailing [email protected]. 1. Call to order / attendance: 2. Approval of the agenda: (Approved by Motion) 3. Approval of minutes: (Approved by Motion) A. November 12, 2020 Regular Meeting 4. Old Business: 5. New Business: A. Public Hearing to consider Conditional Use Permit (USE-0002-2020) BREA Substation 6. Announcements, Reports and Comments: 7. Adjourn: Upcoming Meetings and Events: January 28, 2021 WEST RICHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ACTION ITEMS AGENDA 5b TYPE OF ACTION NEEDED ITEM: MEETING January 5, 2021 Open Record X DATE: Hearing SUBJECT: Public Hearing to consider File Recommend to Final Decision X No. USE-0002-2020 Council Pass Motion Prepared by: Elisha Ransom, Associate 1st Discussion Planner Eric Mendenhall, Community Reviewed by: 2nd Discussion Development Director The Mission of the Community Development Department is to proactively manage and facilitate enhanced vitality of the city’s neighborhoods, business districts, and parks. We are committed to attracting and incentivizing high‐quality development, creation of new jobs, diversity of housing opportunities, city financial growth to support quality services, and to the prevention of decay & degradation of neighborhoods, business districts, and parks. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS ARE SUBJECT TO THE CITY’S TYPE III REVIEW AND PERMITTING PROCESS (QUASI-JUDICIAL ACTION). THE DECISION MADE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS THE FINAL DECISION. THE DECISION MAY BE APPEALED TO THE CITY COUNCIL PER WRMC TITLE 14. PLEASE NO EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION REGARDING THIS ITEM. Staff Report Hearing before the City of West Richland Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Application No. USE-0002-2020 BREA Substation ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application Materials 2. SEPA Checklist and DNS 3. Vicinity Map 4. Public Notice and Public Comments APPLICANT: Benton Rural Electric Association PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Benton REA has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow an electric substation. The electric substation facility is proposed to be built at 8550 Ruppert Road (Parcel ID 135073000001000). The site is zoned Medium Density Residential (RM-6) and major utility facilities are a conditional use. The proposed substation is necessary to meet increased growth of residential and commercial services along the Van Giesen corridor and Lewis and Clark Ranch. Currently, the site is surrounded by farmland and a few residential lots. The proposed site is a 3 acre parcel adjacent to BPA’s 115kV transmission line. The substation will be a fenced 255’ by 250’ rectangle, with the tallest steel structures being 39’ above grade. There are no buildings proposed. An 8’ security fence with access gates will create a secure barrier to unwanted entry. The proposed site is relatively flat and suitable for the proposed use. Benton REA anticipates that the substation will have little to no impact on traffic—one to two employee trips per month for inspections. The only infrastructure needed will be an access driveway off of Ruppert Road. Benton REA also included a Storm Water Control Plan with their application materials (see attachment 1). Rather than being detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare, granting the conditional use permit will provide Benton REA improved ability to provide electric service to the community with higher reliability and capacity. CUP 2020-04 Animal Control Page 3 PROJECT SITE PUBLIC NOTICE: Community Development staff mailed notices to property owners within 600 feet of the subject property on December 7, 2020. A Public Notice was posted on the city website and three official posting locations on December 7, 2020. A Pending Land Use sign was posted at the subject property on December 23, 2020. SEPA: The proposal is subject to environmental review. The West Richland Community Development Department is the lead agency for the proposal under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and reviewed the proposed action for probable adverse environmental impacts and issued a determination of non-significance (DNS) for this proposal on December 30, 2020. The comment period for the DNS concluded on December 21, 2020. COMMENTS RECEIVED: The City received no comments about the SEPA DNS nor about the conditional use permit. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS AND BASIS FOR FINDINGS OF FACT: The Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hold an open record public hearing and approve, approve with conditions, or deny this conditional use permit application (WRMC 14.01.030). Review criteria is outlined in the West Richland Municipal code, and applicable standards/codes include: 1. West Richland Municipal Code: a. Chapter 17.51 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RM-6) b. Chapter 17.54 GENERAL REGULATIONS c. Chapter 17.66 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS CUP 2020-04 Animal Control Page 4 2. The West Richland Comprehensive Plan. The conditional use review process is intended to ensure compatibility between the proposed use and neighboring uses; ensure that the project will not discourage the appropriate development of adjacent land; and, ensure that adjacent land values are not adversely impacted. The planning commission shall consider and be directed by the following criteria as outlined in Section 17.66.030 of the WRMC (each criterion is listed separately and followed by staff’s comments): 1. The conditional use is designed in a manner which is compatible and in harmony with the existing development in the vicinity of the subject property; and the use will not allow conditions which will tend to generate nuisance conditions to adjoining properties. Applicant’s Response: The development of this substation will provide increased reliability and growth capability for the West Richland area by providing new capacity between the existing substations which are approaching their limits of both available power and voltage support. Once complete, the substation will be visited once a month for inspection purposes by Benton REA staff. Staff Comments: The proposed land use (electric substation) can be designed to be in harmony with surrounding land uses and potential nuisances to surrounding properties can be mitigated through compliance of the WRMC and other conditions of the permit. The site is zoned RM-6, and is surrounded by RM-6 and NC to the south and east. Low density residential (outside of City limits) is located across Ruppert Road to the southwest. The proposed facility will have a fenced area that will both create a buffer between surrounding uses and protect the substation from intruders. Land to the south is currently farmland, and the proposed substation will not impact the surrounding uses. 2. The location, size and height of buildings, structures, walls and fences, and screening vegetation for the conditional use shall not hinder or discourage the permitted development or use of properties in the immediate vicinity of the conditional use. Applicant’s Response: The parcel is 3 acres and sits adjacent to BPA’s 115kV transmission line. The substation will be a fenced 255’ by 250’ rectangle, with the tallest steel structures being 39 feet above grade. There are no buildings proposed. An eight foot security fence with access gates will create a secure barrier to unwanted entry. Staff Comments: The proposed major utility facility use will be consistent with the surrounding development and would not hinder or discourage further development in the area. The proposed facility will not discourage permitted development in the adjacent RM-6 zoned areas. The proposed substation will support future development by increasing the capacity needed for development. This type of facility is common in residential areas. 3. The conditional use is designed in a manner that is compatible with the physical characteristics of the subject property. Applicant’s Response: The subject property is relatively flat and adjacent to existing 115kV CUP 2020-04 Animal Control Page 5 transmission line which will be tapped to provide the source for Benton REA’s distribution power for the area. Staff Comments: The proposed substation use is designed to be to be compatible with the physical characteristics of the subject property. The proposed substation and surrounding area are located on relatively flat land of previously disturbed soil. 4. The conditional use is such that pedestrian and vehicular traffic associated with the use will not be hazardous or conflict with existing and anticipated traffic in the adjacent area. Applicant’s Response: Once completed, one to two employees will visit monthly for inspection. Typically using a pickup truck or one-ton service vehicle. No impact to existing traffic is anticipated. Staff Comments: The proposed substation use should not create any hazards or conflict with the existing and anticipated traffic in the adjacent area. The substation is not expected to generate significant traffic. The substation will require one access point on Ruppert Road—which they will construct. 5. The conditional use will be supported by adequate public facilities or services and will not adversely affect public services to the surrounding area or conditions can be established to mitigate adverse impacts on such facilities. Applicant’s Response: The only infrastructure needed will be an access driveway off of Ruppert Road. See attached Storm Water Control Plan.
Recommended publications
  • Syllable Structure in Umatilla Sahaptin* Tymoteusz Alan Chrzanowski

    Syllable Structure in Umatilla Sahaptin* Tymoteusz Alan Chrzanowski

    Syllable Structure in Umatilla Sahaptin* Tymoteusz Alan Chrzanowski A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Linguistics Swarthmore College December 2018 Abstract Umatilla Sahaptin is a Shaptian language spoken in North-Eastern Oregon by the Umatilla tribe. While it has some documentation, such as a dictionary and sketch grammar, there are still acknowledged gaps in the literature. The purpose of this thesis is to fill one of those gaps with a description of syllable structure. To do this I compare data gathered from speakers of Umatilla with published accounts of sylla­ ble structure in the mutually intelligible sister language Yakima. After establishing what is meant by syllable structure and what is known about Yakima, I discuss the data I gathered. Using word list and sentence elicitations, stories, poems, and songs I conclude that Umatilla syllable structure is very similar to Yakima's, with some differences, namely in maximal margins, minimal words, and licensing of sonority sequence defying clusters. 'I would like to thank my consultants, Thomas Morningowl and Mildred Quaemptes, since it was their time and knowledge that made this work possible at all. I would also like to thank the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla, for the privilege of working with the tribe, specifically the Language Program, the Education Commission, and the Board of Trustees. In particular I would like to thank Modesta Minthorn, for her help and guidance through the process of securing per­ mission for my work and scheduling time to do it. I would also like to thank the Eugene M.
  • Library Directions: Volume 13, No

    Library Directions: Volume 13, No

    Library Directions: Volume 13, No. 2 a newsletter of the Spring 2003 University of Washington Libraries Library Directions is produced two times a year Letter from the Director by UW Libraries staff. Inquiries concerning content should be sent to: Library Directions All books are rare books. —Ivan Doig (2002) University of Washington Libraries Box 352900 In Ivan Doig’s compelling essay in this issue of Library Directions, he Seattle, WA 98195-2900 (206) 543-1760 reminds us that “all books are rare books.” We run the risk of losing ([email protected]) the lore, the curiosity, and uniqueness of each author’s insights if we Paul Constantine, Managing Editor Susan Kemp, Editor, Photographer don’t adequately preserve and make accessible the range of human Diana Johnson, Mark Kelly, Stephanie Lamson, eff ort through our libraries. Just as all books are rare books, all digital Mary Mathiason, Mary Whiting, Copy Editors publications are potentially rare publications. We run the same risk of Library Directions is available online at www.lib.washington.edu/about/libdirections/current/. seeing digital scholarship evaporate if we don’t archive and preserve Several sources are used for mailing labels. Please pass the new and evolving forms of publication. multiple copies on to others or return the labels of the unwanted copies to Library Directions. Addresses containing UW campus box numbers were obtained from the HEPPS database and corrections should On March 9-11, the University Libraries hosted a retreat on digital scholarship. Made possible be sent to your departmental payroll coordinator. through the generous funding of the Andrew W.
  • CONFEDERATED TRIBES and BANDS Nos

    CONFEDERATED TRIBES and BANDS Nos

    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS Nos. 19-35807 OF THE YAKAMA NATION, a 19-35821 sovereign federally recognized Native Nation, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant/ 1:17-cv-03192- Cross-Appellee, TOR v. OPINION KLICKITAT COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington; KLICKITAT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, an agency of Klickitat County; BOB SONGER, in his official capacity; KLICKITAT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, an agency of Klickitat County; DAVID QUESNEL, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 20, 2020 Seattle, Washington 2 YAKAMA NATION V. KLICKITAT CNTY. Filed June 11, 2021 Before: Ronald M. Gould and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges, and Jill A. Otake,* District Judge. Opinion by Judge Friedland SUMMARY** Tribal Reservation Affirming the district court’s judgment entered following a bench trial, the panel held that under an 1855 treaty between the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation and the United States, the Yakama Reservation includes a tract, known as Tract D, that partially overlaps with Klickitat County, Washington. The parties’ dispute arose when the County attempted to prosecute P.T.S., a minor and enrolled member of the Tribe, for acts that occurred within Tract D. Pursuant to a proclamation issued by the Governor of Washington, the Yakamas and the federal government share exclusive jurisdiction over certain criminal and civil offenses that occur on Reservation lands. The Yakamas sued the County and County officials, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief barring the County from exercising criminal * The Honorable Jill A.
  • Indian Country Welcome To

    Indian Country Welcome To

    Travel Guide To OREGON Indian Country Welcome to OREGON Indian Country he members of Oregon’s nine federally recognized Ttribes and Travel Oregon invite you to explore our diverse cultures in what is today the state of Oregon. Hundreds of centuries before Lewis & Clark laid eyes on the Pacific Ocean, native peoples lived here – they explored; hunted, gathered and fished; passed along the ancestral ways and observed the ancient rites. The many tribes that once called this land home developed distinct lifestyles and traditions that were passed down generation to generation. Today these traditions are still practiced by our people, and visitors have a special opportunity to experience our unique cultures and distinct histories – a rare glimpse of ancient civilizations that have survived since the beginning of time. You’ll also discover that our rich heritage is being honored alongside new enterprises and technologies that will carry our people forward for centuries to come. The following pages highlight a few of the many attractions available on and around our tribal centers. We encourage you to visit our award-winning native museums and heritage centers and to experience our powwows and cultural events. (You can learn more about scheduled powwows at www.traveloregon.com/powwow.) We hope you’ll also take time to appreciate the natural wonders that make Oregon such an enchanting place to visit – the same mountains, coastline, rivers and valleys that have always provided for our people. Few places in the world offer such a diversity of landscapes, wildlife and culture within such a short drive. Many visitors may choose to visit all nine of Oregon’s federally recognized tribes.
  • SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING and CULTURAL AWARENESS JIM WOODS, DIRECTOR of TRIBAL AFFAIRS, SPECIAL ASSISTANT to the DIRECTOR Native American Tribes Are Here

    SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING and CULTURAL AWARENESS JIM WOODS, DIRECTOR of TRIBAL AFFAIRS, SPECIAL ASSISTANT to the DIRECTOR Native American Tribes Are Here

    Working with Tribes SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING AND CULTURAL AWARENESS JIM WOODS, DIRECTOR OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS, SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR Native American Tribes are here 574 Recognized Tribes in the United States 29 Federally Recognized Tribes in Washington 21 + 2 Treaty Tribes 8 Executive Order Tribes Tribes with Fishing Rights 24 Tribes with off-reservation Hunting Rights Out of State Tribes with rights in Washington Working with our tribal partners The overview: History of Tribal Governments Cultural Relevance & Differences Awareness of Native Lifeways Social Characteristics Stewardship Shared Management and Responsibilities Professional Perspective Resiliency Culture is not a divide. Although Indian tribes are sovereign, that sovereignty is not absolute. It has been challenged, defined, and battled over throughout U.S. history. History of Tribal Governments Tribes have been on this Continent and here in the Pacific Northwest for thousands of years. Historically the Makah believe Orca transformed into a wolf, and thus transforming again into Man. Pre-1492: Pre-Columbus Period Native people lived in organized societies with their own forms of governance for thousands of years before contact with Europeans. Historic Ancient Chinese Explorers traded with WA Coastal Tribes early 1400’s 1513- Spanish explorer Vasco Núñez de Balboa, the first European to sight the Pacific Ocean, when he claimed all lands adjoining this ocean for the Spanish Crown. In the vicinity of the Duwamish River and Elliott Bay where in 1851 the first U.S. settlers began building log cabins, the Duwamish tribe occupied at least 17 villages. The first non-Natives to settle the area were farmers who selected their claims on the Duwamish River on September 16, 1851.
  • 1 EXHIBITS of ALL PLAINTIFFS Ннаexhibits Before the Court Date

    1 EXHIBITS of ALL PLAINTIFFS Ннаexhibits Before the Court Date

    EXHIBITS OF ALL PLAINTIFFS ­­ Exhibits Before the Court Date 1 Exhibit # Description Admitted PL­1 4 pg. typed document of letter 8/24/73 dated 8/30/1854 from Charles E. 5/3/94 (89­ Mix, Acting Commissioner of 3) Indian Affairs to Stevens. Instruction to Stevens re: treaties (typed version of PL­ 34) PL­2 Excerpts from House Doc. 315, 8/24/73 54th Cong. 2d Sess, Report of Join Commissioners (US & Can.) concerning the preservation of fisheries in waters contiguous to the US and Can.; 12/31/1896. pp. 1­2, 14­15, 163­178. PL­3 Typed letter written by M. T. 8/24/73 Simmons, Indian Agent, dated 10/13/1859. PL­4 Typed letter by M. T. Simmons, 8/24/73 Indian Agent, dated 12/13/1859. PL­5 Memorandum opinion dated 9/4/73 7/27/1972 by Dept. of the Interior Assoc. Solicitor, Indian Affairs, entitled "Treaty Status of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe of the Muckleshoot Reservation", 80 I.D. 222 PL­6 Excerpt from typed report of 8/24/73 1860 from Comm. of Indian Affairs to Secy. of the Interior. Report sent by M. T. Simmons, Indian Agent, WA Terr., to Edward R. Geary, Superintendent of Indian Affiars, OR & WA Terr. PL­7 One­page longhand letter dated 8/24/73 12/6/1856, from Isaac I. Stevens to E. W. Fowler 2 PL­8 Three­page longhand letter dated 8/24/73 12/16/1856 from E. S. Fowler to 5/3/94 (89­ Isaac I. Stevens with one­page 3) typed version attached.
  • History of the Central Area

    History of the Central Area

    History of the Central Area Thomas Veith Seattle Historic Preservation Program City of Seattle Department of Neighborhoods 2009 Contents The Central Area Defined p. 3 Preliminaries p. 5 Territorial Period: 1853 – 1889 p. 12 Early Urbanization: 1890 – 1918 p. 25 Between the Wars: 1918 – 1940 p. 49 The Years of Transition: 1940 – 1960 p. 53 Period of Turmoil: 1960 - 1980 p. 63 The Central Area Today p. 85 Bibliography p. 89 Appendix A: Landmarks p. 93 The Central Area Defined Unlike some Seattle neighborhoods, the Central Area has never existed as a political entity separate from the City of Seattle. In addition the Central Area‟s development was not part of a unified real state scheme with coordinated public improvements (such as the Mount Baker community). For these reasons, it has never had official boundaries and various writers describe its extent in various ways. Almost all attempts to describe the neighborhood include a core area bounded by Madison Street on the north, Jackson Street on the south, 15th Avenue on the west, and Martin Luther King, Jr. Way (formerly Empire Way) on the east. In 1975, Nyberg and Steinbrueck identified the eastern boundary of the Central Area as 30th Avenue (more or less), and also included extensions to the north and south of the core area. The extension to the south of Jackson Street was bounded by 30th Avenue (approximately) on the east, Interstate 90 on the south, and the mid-block alley just east of Rainier Avenue South on the west. The extension to the north of Madison Street was bounded on the west by 23rd Avenue, on the east by the Washington Park Arboretum, and extended north to a line just north of East Helen Street marking the boundary between the plats known as the Madison Park Addition and the Hazelwood Addition Supplemental.1 Walt Crowley describes the neighborhood as a “sprawling residential district .
  • The Trials of Leschi, Nisqually Chief

    The Trials of Leschi, Nisqually Chief

    Seattle Journal for Social Justice Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 14 11-1-2006 The Trials of Leschi, Nisqually Chief Kelly Kunsch Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj Recommended Citation Kunsch, Kelly (2006) "The Trials of Leschi, Nisqually Chief," Seattle Journal for Social Justice: Vol. 5 : Iss. 1 , Article 14. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol5/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications and Programs at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seattle Journal for Social Justice by an authorized editor of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 67 The Trials of Leschi, Nisqually Chief Kelly Kunsch1 His people’s bitterness is etched into stone: A MEMORIAL TO CHIEF LESCHI 1808-1858 AN ARBITRATOR OF HIS PEOPLE JUDICIALLY MURDERED, FEBRUARY 19, 18582 There is probably no one convicted of murder more beloved by his people than a man named Leschi. Among other things, he has a neighborhood in Seattle, Washington named after him, a city park, a marina, restaurants and stores, as well as a school on the Puyallup Indian Reservation. His name is revered by Northwest Indians and respected by non-Indians who know his story. And yet, he remains, legally, a convicted murderer. For years there has been a small movement to clear Leschi’s name. However, it was only two years ago, almost 150 years after his conviction, that
  • Pm AGENCY Office of Education (DREW), Washington, P

    Pm AGENCY Office of Education (DREW), Washington, P

    itOCUITT RESUME 2-45t 95 . - ,RC 010 425 .. UTROR' Niatuw, Duane; Rickman, Uncle TITLE The. History and Culture of the'Indiand of Wilahington State ---A curriculua'GuiAer..Revised 1975. ,INmpUTION Washington Office of the State Superintendent of .' Public Instruction, Olympia.; Washington Univ., v .1 . 'Seattle. Coll. of Edication. , ;pm AGENCY Office of Education (DREW), Washington, p. C. r 08-,DATE . 75' Lima -------,_ 248p.: - BOBS PRICE HF-$0443-7801.414.71 Plus POstage. " -DESCRIPTORS Activities; fAmericarLindians; Audioviival lids; *Bibliographies; Cat:mad-inn-Concept Formation; Conflict; *Cultural Awareness; CuTttialBackground. Cultural Differences; *CurriCulumOuideal-iducat4onal Objectives; *Elementary 'Secondary- Education;. Enrichment; Futures (of Society) * 'History; Instructional Materials: InterdiLiplOau Approach:. / Organizations (Groups); Problems; *Reionice ., Haterfals; Social Change; Students; Teachers IDENTIF*S' *Washington -,,,. 'AB4T4CT - 0 social. Designed to be utilized as a supplementtar,,, studies crr culum (any level) .in-the public schodlgirofAiasking,ton thiscurricula*,- guide on: the histOry 4AWc4tt#4 of . ..- 4t4te. ... NAshington's American Indians includes; ailindez; a 0.14-00-;#04ia . , guide;-a guide to teaching materialetsauath0-2, .., resource ._..., -_,,,......- -, ,study,itself. The content of the course of St04200#441'6 ;:thee .: 11#10 4;eisearlii life of the Indians ofilvall#00,01*4,the::,. NMshington Indians! encounter with non 4andiane;,04-0400,0 ,,, .InAians of Washington. The subject patter iso.0#4110kiii*OePt P ' A4'n'Of'Socialissuesand is developedbysielliWWCO:i01041. '. ,,,f ,4ener4imationS, and values derived from all at 00,:4140(science dirge 04Ines;specific objectives and actAvitieg:4Sik 4414- c -60d. e:)14.1liggraphy/resources section inclu400: 40040, l is: ,; mt. ipii; gases: newspapers and journ4s1 twOotdM, MOta 'Wit organizations and institutions; U.S.
  • Indian Tribal Rights and the National Forests: the Case of the Aboriginal Lands of the Nez Perce Tribe

    Indian Tribal Rights and the National Forests: the Case of the Aboriginal Lands of the Nez Perce Tribe

    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 1998 Indian Tribal Rights and the National Forests: The Case of the Aboriginal Lands of the Nez Perce Tribe Charles F. Wilkinson University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Legal History Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Citation Information Charles F. Wilkinson, Indian Tribal Rights and the National Forests: The Case of the Aboriginal Lands of the Nez Perce Tribe, 34 IDAHO L. REV. 435 (1998), available at https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/ 650. Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 34 Idaho L. Rev. 435 1997-1998 Provided by: William A. Wise Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Mon Jun 5 17:33:02 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.
  • CTUIR Traditional Use Study of Willamette Falls and Lower

    CTUIR Traditional Use Study of Willamette Falls and Lower

    Traditional Use Study of Willamette Falls and the Lower Columbia River by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Jennifer Karson Engum, Ph.D. Cultural Resources Protection Program Report prepared for CTUIR Board of Trustees Fish and Wildlife Commission Cultural Resources Committee CAYUSE, UMATILLAANDWALLA WALLA TRIBES November 16, 2020 CONFEDERATED TRIBES of the Umatilla Indian Reservation 46411 Timíne Way PENDLETON, OREGON TREATY JUNE 9, 1855 REDACTED FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Traditional Use Study of Willamette Falls and the Lower Columbia River by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Prepared by Jennifer Karson Engum, Ph.D. Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Department of Natural Resources Cultural Resources Protection Program 46411 Timíne Way Pendleton, Oregon 97801 Prepared for CTUIR Board of Trustees Fish and Wildlife Commission Cultural Resources Committee November 16, 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Umatilla (Imatalamłáma), Cayuse (Weyíiletpu), and Walla Walla (Walúulapam) peoples, who comprise the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR), have traveled throughout the west, including to the lower Columbia and Willamette Rivers and to Willamette Falls, to exercise their reserved treaty rights to hunt, fish, and gather the traditional subsistence resources known as the First Foods. They have been doing so since time immemorial, an important indigenous concept which describes a time continuum that spans from ancient times to present day. In post- contact years, interactions expanded to include explorers, traders and missionaries, who brought with them new opportunities for trade and intermarriage as well as the devastating circumstances brought by disease, warfare, and the reservation era. Through cultural adaptation and uninterrupted treaty rights, the CTUIR never ceased to continue to travel to the lower Columbia and Willamette River and falls for seasonal traditional practice and for other purposes.
  • Russian American Contacts, 1917-1937: a Review Article

    Russian American Contacts, 1917-1937: a Review Article

    names of individual forts; names of M. Odivetz, and Paul J. Novgorotsev, Rydell, Robert W., All the World’s a Fair: individual ships 20(3):235-36 Visions of Empire at American “Russian American Contacts, 1917-1937: Russian Shadows on the British Northwest International Expositions, 1876-1916, A Review Article,” by Charles E. Coast of North America, 1810-1890: review, 77(2):74; In the People’s Interest: Timberlake, 61(4):217-21 A Study of Rejection of Defence A Centennial History of Montana State A Russian American Photographer in Tlingit Responsibilities, by Glynn Barratt, University, review, 85(2):70 Country: Vincent Soboleff in Alaska, by review, 75(4):186 Ryesky, Diana, “Blanche Payne, Scholar Sergei Kan, review, 105(1):43-44 “Russian Shipbuilding in the American and Teacher: Her Career in Costume Russian Expansion on the Pacific, 1641-1850, Colonies,” by Clarence L. Andrews, History,” 77(1):21-31 by F. A. Golder, review, 6(2):119-20 25(1):3-10 Ryker, Lois Valliant, With History Around Me: “A Russian Expedition to Japan in 1852,” by The Russian Withdrawal From California, by Spokane Nostalgia, review, 72(4):185 Paul E. Eckel, 34(2):159-67 Clarence John Du Four, 25(1):73 Rylatt, R. M., Surveying the Canadian Pacific: “Russian Exploration in Interior Alaska: An Russian-American convention (1824), Memoir of a Railroad Pioneer, review, Extract from the Journal of Andrei 11(2):83-88, 13(2):93-100 84(2):69 Glazunov,” by James W. VanStone, Russian-American Telegraph, Western Union Ryman, James H. T., rev. of Indian and 50(2):37-47 Extension, 72(3):137-40 White in the Northwest: A History of Russian Extension Telegraph.