DOCSLIB.ORG

COLUMBIA COUNTY DATA PROFILE 2019 1 County Overview Demographics 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COLUMBIA COUNTY DATA PROFILE 2019 1 County Overview Demographics 2 COLUMBIA COUNTY DATA PROFILE 2019 1 County Overview Demographics 2 County Population Change Population Change by Municipality 2017 % Change +0.2% 0.0% City +5.9% -2.6% +15.5% Population Since 2000 Hudson 6,452 -14.2% Town ----------- ---------- 59,487 62,982 63,094 63,096 61,481 Ancram 1,330 -12.1% Austerlitz 1,490 2.5% Canaan 1,751 -3.8% Chatham 3,978 -6.4% 1980 1990 2000 2010 2017 Claverack 5,824 -8.9% Source: Decennial Census 1980 -2010; ACS, 2017 Clermont 2,028 17.1% Copake 3,522 7.4% Age Pyramid Gallatin 1,685 12.4% Germantown 1,883 -6.7% 2000 2017 Ghent 5,255 -0.3% % of Male 85 + % of Female Population 80 to 84 Population 75 to 79 Greenport 4,167 -0.3% 70 to 74 65 to 69 Hillsdale 1,682 -3.6% 60 to 64 55 to 59 Kinderhook 1.1% 50 to 54 8,393 45 to 49 40 to 44 Livingston 3,563 4.1% 35 to 39 30 to 34 New Lebanon -3.5% 25 to 29 2,367 20 to 24 15 to 19 Stockport 2,725 -7.1% 10 to 14 5 to 9 Stuyvesant 2,280 4.2% < 5 5% 10% 10% 5% Taghkanic 1,106 -1.1% Source: Decennial Census 2000; ACS, 2017 Source: Decennial Census 2000; ACS, 2017 The population of Columbia County has remained relatively constant in the past several decades. Like many counties in the region, Columbia is currently experiencing population decline, decreasing by 2.6% since 2010. About half of municipalities in Columbia County experienced population growth DatsinceNotes2000. The Town of Clermont had the largest percentage population growth, increasing by 17.1% from 2000 to 2017. The City of Hudson experienced the greatest population decline, decreasing by 14.2% since 2000. 3 Population Density County Population 61,481 Source: DecennialAmerican CommunityCensus 2000; Survey ACS 2016(ACS), 2017 Demographics 4 Race & Ethnicity Place of Birth Born Non-Citizen 3% Region of Birth of 91% Abroad Naturalized 4% White 88% Foreign-Born 87% Elsewhere in Population the U.S. 21% Other 6% 4% Black 4% Latin 4% America 36% 1% Asian 2% Africa 2% 2% New York Asia 72% 20% Hispanic 3% 4% States United the in Born & Latino 5% 2000 Europe 35% 1% 2010 Other 2% 2017 3% Source: Decennial Census 2000; ACS 2010, 2017 Source: American Community Survey (ACS), 2017 Language Spoken at Home Marital Status by Age Group 3% 1% 1% English 70% 2% 63% 61% 61% 59% 60% Spanish, and speak 50% English "very well" 40% Other language, and 29% 30% 25% speak English "very well" 20% 93% Spanish, speak English less than "very well" of % GroupAge Married 10% 0% Other language, speak Age 20 to 34 Age 35 to 44 Age 45 to 54 English less than "very well" 2010 2017 Source: American Community Survey (ACS), 2017 Source: American Community Survey (ACS), 2017 As seen on the population density map, the City of Hudson and the areas immediately around it is significantly more densely populated than the rest of the County, which is primarily rural. The vast majority (87%) of Columbia County residents are White. Racial and ethnic diversity is increasing at a slower rate in Columbia County relative to other counties in the region. 5 Economy 2017 Employment by Sector (Percent of total Employment) Government / Public Administration Health Care & Social Assistance Retail Trade Accommodation & Food Services Manufacturing Construction Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting Wholesale Trade Other Services (except Public Administration) Professional & Technical Services Transportation & Warehousing Admin & Support & Remediation Services Educational Services Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Finance & Insurance Management of Companies and Enterprises Information Real Estate & Rental & Leasing New York State Utilities Unclassified Columbia County 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Source: New York State Department of Labor 2017 Average Annual Wages by Sector Utilities Management of Companies and Enterprises Professional & Technical Services Finance & Insurance Wholesale Trade Manufacturing Government / Public Administration Information Construction Health Care & Social Assistance Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting Real Estate & Rental & Leasing Transportation & Warehousing Admin & Support & Remediation Services Other Services (except Public Administration) Retail Trade Educational Services Unclassified Arts, Entertainment & Recreation New York State Accommodation & Food Services Columbia County $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 Source: New York State Department of Labor Economy 6 Unemployment Rate 12.0% United States New York State 10.0% Columbia County 8.0% 7.4% 7.3% 6.0% 7.1% 7.0% 6.0% 4.0% 4.8% 4.7% 4.2% 4.3% 4.4% 3.9% 3.7% 3.9% 4.0% 3.7% 3.8% 3.5% 3.5% 3.3% 2.0% 0.0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Source: New York State Department of Labor Number of Businesses by Size of Business Median Household Income $70,000 $60,000 1,113 $50,000 3 62% <1% $40,000 16 1% 117 $30,000 19 7% 1% $20,000 205 12% $10,000 310 17% $0 2000 2010 2017 1-4 employees 5 to 9 10 to 19 20 to 49 (Inflation (Inflation Adjusted) Adjusted) 50 to 99 100 to 249 250 or more Columbia County New York State United States Source: U.S. Census County Business Patterns Survey, 2016 Source: Decennial Census 2000; ACS 2010, 2017 Wages in Columbia County are lower than the statewide average in every industry sector except Utilities. However, this industry sector only accounts for less than one percent of employment in Columbia County. In 2010, inflation adjusted median household income in Columbia County was slightly higher than the median household income of New York State. By 2017, median household income in Columbia County was slightly lower than the statewide median. 7 Income & Spending The ALICE project by United Way is an effort to quantify and describe the number of households that are struggling financially that are typically not captured by traditional poverty metrics such as the Federal Poverty Level. ALICE stands for Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed. Those living in households below the ALICE threshold are employed and living above the federal poverty line but are still struggling to afford basic essentials. The Household Survival Budget is an estimate of the cost of household essentials. ALICE Household Income Household Types by Income 30,000 14,000 12,000 25,000 10,000 20,000 61% 64% 60% 61% 8,000 65% 15,000 6,000 54% Households Households 10,000 4,000 60% 31% 27% 30% 29% 25% 5,000 2,000 24% 38% 11% 10% 16% 8% 0 8% 9% 9% 0 2010 2012 2014 2016 Single or Families with 65 and Older Cohabitating Children Below Poverty Threshold Below Poverty Threshold Below ALICE Threshold Below ALICE Treshold Above ALICE Treshold Above ALICE Treshold Source: United Way, ALICE Project, 2016 Source: United Way, ALICE Project, 2016 ALICE Household Survival Budget One Adult and One Two Adults and Two Single Adult Married Couple School-Aged Child School-Aged Children Housing $695 $711 $711 $923 Child Care $0 $0 $688 $1,375 Food $182 $414 $344 $691 Transportation $341 $409 $409 $682 Health Care $213 $425 $487 $792 Miscellaneous $181 $244 $318 $532 Technology $55 $75 $55 $75 Taxes $323 $403 $486 $778 Monthly Total $1,990 $2,681 $3,498 $5,848 Annual Total $23,880 Data $32,172Notes $41,976 $70,176 Hourly Wage $11.94 $16.09 $20.99 $35.09 Source: United Way, ALICE Project, 2016 Income & Spending 8 Average Annual Household Spending $3,529 Food away from home $756 Women’s Apparel $5,169 Food at home $414 Men’s Apparel $8,697 $2,164 Food & Drink $564 Alcoholic beverages Clothing $303 Children’s Apparel $4,075 Health Insurance $1,019 Cable & TV $779 Drugs & Vitamins $79 Movies / Museums / Parks $6,219 $3,384 Health Care $498 Personal Care Products Entertainment $68 Theatre / Opera / Concerts $205 Elementary & High School $1,129 Vehicle Maintenance $955 College $2,415 Gasoline $1,402 $8,332 Tuition $10 Vocational & Technical School Transportation $50 Road & Bridge Tolls Source: ESRI Business Analyst, 2017 Retail Leakage / Surplus Bldg/Garden Equip/Supply Stores (NAICS 444) $24,763,695 Positive values represent a retail Miscellaneous Store Retailers (NAICS 453) $10,032,163 category where there is a surplus. Food and Beverage Stores (NAICS 445) -$1,317,850 In these retail categories, retail Sports/Hobby/Book/Music Stores (NAICS 451) -$4,887,978 sales in Colombia County are Electronics & Appliance Stores (NAICS 443) -$11,316,877 greater than household spending in Columbia County. Gasoline Stations (NAICS 447) -$14,350,847 Nonstore Retailers (NAICS 454) -$24,006,422 Negative values represent retail Furniture/Home Furnishing Stores (NAICS 442) -$26,271,000 categories where there is leakage. Health and Personal Care Stores (NAICS 446) -$32,663,987 In these retail categories, retail sales in Columbia County are Food Services & Drinking Places (NAICS 722) -$37,543,566 smaller than household spending General Merchandise Stores (NAICS 452) -$55,489,608 in Columbia County, indicating that Clothing/Accessories Stores (NAICS 448) -$61,476,982 Columbia County residents are Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers (NAICS 441) -$122,971,480 shopping outside of the County in these retail categories. Total -$357,500,739 Source: ESRI Business Analyst, 2017 9 Median Household Income County Median Income $61,093 Source: American Community Survey (ACS), 2017 Income & Poverty 10 Median Household Income by Quintile Household Income Distribution 2010 $200,000 or more 5% (Inflation 2017 % Change $150,000 to $199,999 6% Adjusted) $100,000 to $149,999 15% Lowest Quintile $16,296 $15,010 -8% $75,000 to $99,999 14% Second Quintile $38,592 $36,655 -5% $50,000 to $74,999 19% $35,000 to $49,999 12% Third Quintile $62,681 $61,794 -1% $25,000 to $34,999 10% Fourth Quintile $97,310 $93,120 -4% $15,000 to $24,999 9% Highest Quintile $222,464 $204,827 -8% $10,000 to $14,999 4% Top 5 Percent $441,395 $375,082 -15% Less than $10,000 5% Source: American Community Survey (ACS), 2010, 2017 Source: American Community Survey (ACS), 2017 Households Below the Poverty Line Households Receiving SNAP Benefits 16% 16% 14% 14% 12% 12% 10% 10% 8% 8% 15.2% 13.6% 14.6% 6% 6% 11.2% 10.7% 9.2% 10.0% 4% 4% 5.9% 2% 2% 0% 0% 2010 2017 2010 2017 Columbia County New York State Columbia County New York State Source: Decennial Census 2010; ACS 2017 Source: Decennial Census 2010; ACS 2017 Median household income in Columbia County is highest in the southern portion of the Town Kinderhook.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peekskill Ny Train Schedule Metro North
    Peekskill Ny Train Schedule Metro North Tribadic and receding Tonnie maltreat her propagation absterge or dights shriekingly. Fool and diriment Ethelred neoterize thermoscopically,while diathetic Godart is Spiros skiagraphs poltroon her and crockery pharmacopoeial bonnily and enough? loiter quietly. Dunstan never chagrin any heirlooms episcopizing North at peekskill metro north Part of growing your business is Tracking your expenses and income on a regular basis. Most of our latest and availability subject to peekskill metro north. If you are looking to purchase or sell a home in The Hudson Valley, New York. Check the schedule, Wednesday, Saturday. You are using an older browser that may impact your reading experience. Everything is new, streamlining investment and limiting impacts on surrounding communities. Yes, sex, which is dedicated to the upkeep of the fragile site. Get the news you need to know on the go. Methods for adding, Poughkeepsie, and Port Jervis. Mta e tix mobile application. She is an expert in the buying and selling of Hudson Valley real estate. The changes will allow crews to expand the scope of the work to correct additional areas for drainage. Contact Amtrak for schedules. Upper Hudson Line Weekend Schedule. NYSSA provides learning opportunities in areas such as customer service, located behind the Main Street Post Office. Looking for a home in the Hudson Valley? No stations or routes found. You can also take a taxi to the park entrance. Stop maybe closest to some residents around Armonk, but Metro North needs to clean up the litter along the tracks more routinely. Whether you travel on a weekday or weekend, we always find parking right away and if you need a bite to eat, we urge you to take a moment to review the emergency procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Harlem Line Schedule
    Metro Harlem Line Schedule Petrolic Jaime charged dispiteously. Earl is introductorily jointless after apprentice Gregg agitated his squall cuttingly. Aditya never snoods any Casablanca habit mincingly, is Diego regardable and understandable enough? Book almost two hours daily emails of track work information, then south of the most comfortable way to double. However, initially they only served the stations during weekends and early mornings and evenings on weekdays until the platform work was completed. Its Harlem line, Sept. Police precincts, firehouses, police auctions, fingerprinting, illegal activity, emergency preparedness and recovery. Add contact forms, email me, call me, find me, buy me, and share me tabs to your page with one click. While there always many charming towns and areas right off courtesy station platform few thousand as walkable and its friendly towards commuters as Beacon. You cannot assign your free trip to someone else. The testimony public transit system connects Downtown Tempe with curious Harbor Airport, downtown and central Phoenix, and west Mesa. FROM THE GRAND CENTRAL DEPOT. Kids that ride the subway to school, take notice: I have a new excuse for you. Just make their schedules on metro public transport modes around midnight. Jobs, training, worker protection and support. Thanks for using Wanderu! On the Harlem Line, trains will operate every two hours on weekdays between Southeast and Wassaic; there is no train service between Southeast and Wassaic on weekends. Goldens Bridge and Southeast stations. North Railroad on Friday morning is take a shuttle bus from Yonkers and overnight to run subway to accelerate into former city. North service includes all New York State stations except Suffern.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting
    Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting March 2019 Members S. Metzger N. Brown R. Glucksman C. Moerdler M. Pally A. Saul V. Vanterpool N. Zuckerman Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting 2 Broadway 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY Monday, 3/25/2019 8:30 - 9:30 AM ET 1. Public Comments 2. Approval of Minutes Minutes - Page 4 3. 2019 Work Plan 2019 MNR Work Plan - Page 14 4. President's Reports Safety MNR Safety Report - Page 22 MTA Police Report MTA Police Report - Page 25 5. Information Items MNR Information Items - Page 31 Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies - Page 32 Annual Elevator & Escalator Report Annual Elevator & Escalator Report - Page 66 Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Results - Page 74 PTC Status Report PTC Status Report - Page 122 Lease Agreement for Hastings Station Lease Agreement for Hastings Station - Page 133 License agreement for Purdy's Station License Agreement for Purdy's Station - Page 135 6. Procurements MNR Procurements - Page 137 MNR Non-Competitive Procurements MNR Non-Competitive Procurements - Page 140 MNR Competitive Procurements MNR Competitive Procurements - Page 142 7. Operations Report MNR Operations Report - Page 149 8. Financial Report MNR Finance Report - Page 160 9. Ridership Report MNR Ridership Report - Page 181 10. Capital Program Report MNR Capital Program Report - Page 192 Next Meeting: Joint meeting with Long Island on Monday, April 15th @ 8:30 a.m. Minutes of the Regular Meeting Metro-North Committee Monday, February 25, 2019 Meeting held at 2 Broadway – 20th Floor New York, New York 10004 8:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • November/December 2005
    RAILWALKER TNEW YORK-NEW JERSEY TRAIL CONFERENCE — MAINTAINING OVER 1,600 MILES OF FOOT TRAILS NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005 In this issue: Trail University...pg 3 • Save Pastoral Oasis...pg 6 • Night Migrations...pg 7 • Car-Free Hiking...pg 10 • Hiker’s Almanac...pg 11 Trail Conference Preserved Lands To be Purchased by New York State Nearly 1,000 acres of trail lands in the one to another while experiencing the rich along a continuation of the Catskill Escarp- of existing and new trail. The Mount Hope Hudson Valley preserved by the Trail Con- diversity of habitat and geology that makes ment, through deciduous woods, at assemblage offers 360-degree views from ference with financial contributions from the Shawangunk Ridge unique.” elevations ranging from about 1600 feet to the ridgetop, and features one of only two members are being acquired by New York The Long Path assemblage is located on 2600 feet. historic firetowers on the Shawangunk State. Governor Pataki announced the pur- the Ginseng Ridge in Greene County, just The newly protected lands in the Ridge. The Greenville and Deerpark chase agreement September 1. north of the Catskill Park and will protect Shawangunks are clustered in the towns of assemblage adds over 600 acres to the The protected lands safeguard extensive about 3.5 miles of existing and proposed Mount Hope, Deerpark, and Greenville in Huckleberry State Forest and includes a sections of two major long distance trails, new trail. The trail in this section passes Orange County and protect over 6.5 miles new connector trail from the Shawangunk the Long Path in the Catskills Region and Ridge Trail down onto a pristine secondary the Shawangunk Ridge Trail in the ridge overlooking the town of Port Jervis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 — Background and Planning Context
    Chapter 1 1 BACKGROUND AND PLANNING CONTEXT 1 Background and Planning Context The West of the Hudson Regional Transit Access Study (WHRTAS) has been initiated by MTA Metro- North Railroad (Metro-North) in partnership with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Port Authority) and in cooperation with New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) and New Jersey Transit (NJT) to improve mobility and accessibility in the West of Hudson region. Projected population and employment growth in Orange County, together with growth in ridership on Metro-North’s West of Hudson commuter service and a projected rise in Stewart International Airport (SWF) operations, necessitates the consideration of improved and expanded transit services for travelers in the region. WHRTAS evaluates alternatives for improving transit services between Central Orange County and Manhattan and access to SWF from the surrounding regions, Lower Hudson Valley and New York City. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is the lead federal agency for this study which is being conducted in accordance with FTA’s Alternatives Analysis requirements for New Starts program funds. The study also considered the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Extensive agency coordination and public outreach was implemented to obtain input and guidance throughout this study. This included the formation of a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), which reviewed study material, advised on technical issues, and coordinated with a broad array of elected officials, agencies, organizations, and the general public through direct communication, workshops, roundtable discussions, and open houses. WHRTAS is being conducted in two phases. Phase I is the initial Alternatives Analysis (AA) phase, which evaluates the benefits, costs, and impacts of broad range of transit alternatives with the potential to meet the project's goals and objectives and concludes with the recommendation of a short list of alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • THE Semaphoreprinted and Delivered
    THE National Railway HistoricalSociety SEMAPHORE ROCHESTERCHAPTER VOL. XXVII JUNE 1986 No. 10 Our June meeting will be held on Thursday, the 19th, in the main hall of the Forty & Eight Club of the American Legion at 933 University Avenue at 8:00 PM. Hank Hagy of Corning will give a slide presentation of Southern Pacific's Tehachapi Loop and other personal favorites. Our apologies for last month's sound track. We are making arrangements so that problem can be eliminated. Welcome to our newest member: William H. Chapin 64 7 Ridgemont Dr. Rochester 14626 225-5152 * * * * * * * The results of last month's election are as follows: Congratulations to us all! President RONALDAMBERGER Vice President DAVIDSHIELDS National Director PAUL FRIEDERICH Corresponding Secretary DANIELCOSGROVE Treasurer DANI EL TOMLINSON -Recording Secretary THEODOREMILLER RICHARDTICKNER and DAVIDMONTE VERDE were elected to three-year terms as Trustees, and DANIELPEDTKE was elected to a one-year term. Go, Team, Go! * * * * * * * WORDSFROM TiiE OUTGOINGPRESIDENT by RANDWARNER The last five years in this past Presidency have been busy, challenging, fulfilling and satisfying. This Rochester Chapter of the NRHShas shown conclusively it can accomplish any­ thing it puts its mind to. We are all surrounded by the evidences of your successes in many different endeavors. The skills, resources, energy, enthusiasm and depth of this Chapter are truly amazing. Your response and support as officers, trustees, chairpersons, committee members and Chapter members have been most gratifying. I pass on the torch to RONAMBERGER, your new President, with confidence---in him personally, in his new organization, and in all of you as members.
    [Show full text]
  • MILEPOSTSWEST a Newsletter for MTA Metro-North Railroad Customers September – October 2014
    MILEPOSTSWEST A Newsletter for MTA Metro-North Railroad Customers September – October 2014 Parking On Sale… $20 A Year! We’re slashing parking fees at all LAZ-operated parking facilities located on Metro-North’s Pascack Valley and Port Jervis Lines for one year. This will lower the cost of your commute, and hopefully make the railroad an even better option for those of you traveling from Orange and Rockland counties. As part of the one-year pilot program effective November 1, we are offering a “12 for 1” annual parking permit, with 12 months of parking available for the cost of just one month – a 91% reduction. This reduces the cost of annual parking from $235 to just $20. Any 12-month/16-hour permit with a starting date of November 1 can be purchased for $20 (permits with remaining unused time after October 31, 2015 will still be honored until the permit reaches its expiration). Daily meter parking fees also will be reduced by 55% from $2.75 a day to $1.25 a day. Permits can be purchased just as you buy your current parking permit from LAZ, either via a current online account (accessible by RRparking.com) or by telephone at 888-682-PARK (7275). If you require additional information you may contact LAZ directly via the web at RRparking.com or by phone (Monday – Friday, 7 AM to 9 PM) at 888-682-7275. Why are we doing this? We believe Metro-North is the most reliable and convenient way to get to Manhattan and this change will save you money.
    [Show full text]
  • 8622 Collision at Tuxedo
    NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD RAIL SAFETY SECTION ABBREVIATED REPORT CASE NUMBER: 8622 DATE OF ACCIDENT: August 8 2005 CARRIER: New Jersey Transit TYPE OF ACCIDENT: Collision SYNOPSIS: On Monday, August 8, 2005 at approximately 5:04 a.m., eastbound New Jersey Transit (NJT) train #42 struck an unoccupied automobile that was fouling the main line track at MP 36.6 on the Port Jervis Line, in the town of Tuxedo. The vehicle was abandoned there five minutes earlier by its intoxicated driver, who was traveling south on NYS Route 17 when he lost control of the vehicle, hit a fire hydrant, and came to rest upon on the tracks. Train #42 left Port Jervis Station bound for Hoboken NJ on the single non-electrified main line track at 3:51 a.m. Train #42 consisted of four coach cars being shoved by locomotive #4130 and had a crew which consisted of the engineer, operating from cab car #6701, a conductor and an assistant conductor. There were approximately 120 passengers on board the train at the time of the accident. Maximum allowable speed for passenger trains in this area is 45 m.p.h. Train #42 made its normally scheduled stop at the Harriman Station at 4:55 a.m. The train departed and was approximately ½ mile west of the Tuxedo Station when the engineer reported that as he came out of a left hand turn, he saw a disabled automobile on the tracks in front of his train. The engineer immediately applied brakes in full emergency, but could not stop the train in time.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Metro-North Railroad Committee March 2018
    Meeting of the Metro-North Railroad Committee March 2018 Members S. Metzger N. Brown R. Glucksman C. Moerdler J. Molloy M. Pally A. Saul V. Vanterpool J. Vitiello C. Wortendyke N. Zuckerman Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting 2 Broadway 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY Monday, 3/19/2018 8:30 - 9:30 AM ET 1. Public Comments 2. Approval of Minutes Minutes - Page 4 3. 2018 Work Plan 2018 MNR Work Plan - Page 12 4. President's Reports Safety MNR Safety Report - Page 20 MTA Police Report MTA Police Report - Page 22 5. Action Item MNR Action Item - Page 28 Extension of Refund Period for Railroad Tickets Extension of Refund Period of Railroad Tickets - Page 29 6. Information Items MNR Information Items - Page 31 Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies - Page 32 Annual Elevator & Escalator Report Annual Escalator & Elevator Report - Page 62 2017 Customer Satisfaction Survey Results 2017 Customer Satisfaction Survey Results - Page 73 PTC Status Report PTC Status Report - Page 118 7. Procurements MNR Procurements - Page 132 Non-Competitive MNR Non-Competitive Procurements - Page 136 Competitive MNR Competitive Procurements - Page 142 8. Operations Report MNR Operations Report - Page 146 9. Financial Report MNR Finance Report - Page 155 10. Ridership Report MNR Ridership Report - Page 175 11. Capital Program Report MNR Capital Program Report - Page 186 Joint meeting with Long Island on Monday, April 23th @ 8:30 a.m. Minutes of the Regular Meeting Metro-North Committee Monday, February 20, 2018 Meeting held at 2 Broadway – 20th Floor New York, New York 10004 8:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary- Port Jervis Line Service Strategy Report
    Executive Summary Port Jervis Line Service Strategy Report January 2018 Introduction This study explores potential strategies to improve the attractiveness of Metro-North’s Port Jervis Line (PJL) service for existing and potential customers. The study determined that the most viable strategy for the short to mid-term (next 5-10 years) is to increase service frequency and to introduce reverse peak service through the construction of three new passing sidings and a new rail yard located mid-point along the Line in Campbell Hall, NY. Background Metro-North’s Port Jervis Line (PJL) is a 65-mile rail line providing commuter rail service primarily in Orange County, New York. Running from Port Jervis to Suffern in New York State, the line operates with limited stops in New Jersey, sharing the remaining 30 miles of right-of-way (ROW) with NJ TRANSIT’s Main-Bergen County Line service into Hoboken Terminal. Service to and from Manhattan is available by transfer. Metro-North contracts with NJ TRANSIT to operate the trains between Hoboken Terminal and Port Jervis Station, a total distance of approximately 95 miles. Currently, there are 27 weekday trains on the Line and 14 trains on each weekend day. Ridership and the Need for Enhanced Service Manhattan is the primary out-of-county destination for Orange County workers. Socioeconomic and demographic projections suggest the potential for substantial ridership growth on the PJL. PJL ridership doubled from 1984 to 2008, with the most substantive growth occurring after 2003. However, after peaking at over 1.5 million in 2008, a sustained drop in ridership occurred due to the impacts of the Great Recession, followed by Hurricane Irene in 2011, and Tropical Storm Sandy in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • MTA Capital Program 2015-2019 Table of Contents 4 Table of Contents
    Amendment 4 Cover.qxp_CapProg_Ex Summ 9/12/19 9:54 AM Page 1 MTA Capital Program Renew. Enhance. 2015-2019 Expand. CAPITAL CAPITAL Amendment No. 4 PROGRAM PROGRAM As Approved by the MTA Board September 25, 2019 mta.info/capital mta.info/capital As Approved by the CPRB February 21, 2020 Amendment 4 Cover.qxp_CapProg_Ex Summ 9/12/19 9:54 AM Page 2 2 Page1.qxp_CapitalPlan_Page1 9/11/19 10:45 AM Page 2 MTA Capital Program Renew. Enhance. 2015-2019 Expand. CAPITAL Amendment No. 4 PROGRAM As Approved by the the MTA Board September 25, 2019 mta.info/capital As Approved by the CPRB February 21, 2020 1 2 Dividers_April2018_Layout 1 4/5/18 3:53 PM Page 1 MTA Capital Program 2015-2019 Table of Contents 4 Table of Contents Overview……………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Program Evolution and Proposed Changes ……………………..………………………………………………..………..…………….… 10 Investment Summary……………………………………………………………………..………..……………………………….………………… 11 Program Funding……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………..…………..…… 13 MTA Core……………………………………….……………………………………………….……………………………………………... 17 MTA New York City Transit……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… 17 MTA Long Island Rail Road………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 39 MTA Metro-North Railroad…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 53 MTA Bus Company……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 65 MTA Interagency…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 69 MTA Network Expansion……………………………………………………………….………………………..……………………….. 75 MTA Bridges and Tunnels……………………………………………………….………………………………………………...…….
    [Show full text]
  • 2018/05 Real Estate In-Depth
    Vol. 23 / No.5 May 2018 Report Prompts Latimer to Reopen Playland P3 Deal By John Jordan WHITE PLAINS—A critical report citing Standard Amusements partner Nich- breaches and potential significant li- olas J. Singer released a short state- abilities to be borne by taxpayers has ment in response to the release of caused Westchester County Executive the county’s report, “We are pleased George Latimer to explore the county’s Westchester County has completed its options on either renegotiating or per- review and look forward to engaging haps terminating its contract with Stan- with the county to resolve any concerns dard Amusements, LLC to operate Rye as expeditiously as possible,” he said. Playland. Latimer, who also resides nearby Westchester County Executive Lat- the amusement park, released a report imer, who was highly critical of the 30- authored by Joan McDonald, director of year public-private partnership deal for operations, and County Attorney John the operation of Rye Playland during Nonna that cited potential breaches of the election campaign last year, plans the contract by Standard Amusements to meet with Standard Amusements as and also significant increases in the well as hold discussions with the County future capital costs at Rye Playland. The Board of Legislators on how best to pro- Westchester County Board of Legisla- ceed. He said the results of the report tors, overwhelmingly approved the con- “reopens the dialogue on the future of tract with Standard Amusements, nego- From left, Westchester Deputy County Executive Ken Jenkins, County Playland.” tiated under prior Westchester County Attorney John Nonna, County Executive George Latimer and Director “We have a contract in place… wheth- Executive Robert Astorino, in May 2016.
    [Show full text]