DOCSLIB.ORG

USAGM FY 2022 CBJ Final 05.26.2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USAGM FY 2022 CBJ Final 05.26.2021 CONGRESSIONAL FY 2022 BUDGET JUSTIFICATION Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 Summary Charts ........................................................................................................................7 Legislative Proposals ................................................................................................................9 Voice of America (VOA) .........................................................................................................13 Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB) ....................................................................................27 International Broadcasting Bureau (IBB) ........................................................................31 Technology, Services, and Innovation (TSI) ....................................................................35 Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) .................................................................. 39 Radio Free Asia (RFA) ............................................................................................................ 47 Middle East Broadcasting Networks, Inc. (MBN) ..........................................................53 Open Technology Fund (OTF) .............................................................................................61 Broadcasting Capital Improvements (BCI) .................................................................... 69 Performance Budget Information ......................................................................................75 Appendix A: Budget Charts ................................................................................................ 131 Appendix B: Broadcast Hours ...........................................................................................145 Cover images from USAGM coverage, clockwise from top left: VOA Turkish’s Mehtap Colak Yilmaz reporting from the Black Lives Matter protests in Washington, DC.; MBN reporter on the scene; RFA Uyghur Service’s Gulchehra Hoja; RFE/RL cameraman Andrey Rabchyk. FY 2022 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION | Table of Contents i (page left intentionally blank) ii Executive Summary As Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 approaches, the international media environment is awash with unprecedented levels of misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda on topics affecting public health, humanitarian challenges, and political crises. America’s adversaries understand the power and effectiveness of speaking to global audiences and they are making investments that greatly outpace our own. Much of their effort is designed to sow false narratives about American policies and weaken our country’s standing worldwide. In the face of these global threats, the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) is building on successes in key markets with its two federal networks — the Voice of America (VOA) and the Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB) — and its four non- federal entities — Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), Radio Free Asia (RFA), the Middle East Broadcasting Networks (MBN), and the Open Technology Fund (OTF). USAGM’s networks reached a record weekly audience of 354 million people last year, providing news and information on radio, television, internet, social media, and mobile platforms. USAGM is one of the largest media organizations in the world and our brands are some of the most recognized and respected in key foreign markets, including China, Russia, and Iran. Our programming ranges from vital, fact-based information on the COVID-19 pandemic to government corruption that local news outlets are unable or unwilling to cover. In combination with our global reach, the trust that USAGM’s audiences place in the information we provide — and how USAGM informs their opinions on current events — is critical to combatting the deception and falsehoods spread by authoritarian regimes and violent non-state actors. Accurate and truthful news and information has never seen the volume and complexity of challenges around the world, and USAGM pushes back with content that is fact-based, engaging, and relevant to global audiences. The President’s Request of $810 million will enable USAGM to continue its vital mission in strategically important markets around the world. FY 2022 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION | Executive Summary 1 East and Southeast Asia In East and Southeast Asia, VOA and RFA have provided fact-based, objective MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA reporting in the face of China’s increasingly antagonistic narrative on American- Data from Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Chinese relations and shed light on humanitarian crises in theJordan, region. Kuwait, Lebanon, For Libya, Morocco, Palestinian Territories, example, in “The Dragon’s Tail”31.7 programming, MILLION VOA will examineQatar, Saudi China’s Arabia, Tunisia, role Turkey, UAE, Yemen. Reflects in large infrastructure projects in other countries and the potentialaudiences for that MBN theseand VOA. projects will undermine longstanding relationships with the United States and its allies. In-depth coverage like this has helped to increase VOA’s Mandarin Service website views by 47 percent over the prior year. Additionally, RFA will continue to cover humanitarianNEAR crisesEAST, SOUTH as they AND develop CENTRAL in the ASIA, region, EURASIA building Data from Afghanistan, Albania, Armenia, on its groundbreaking disclosure of the mistreatment andAzerbaijan, mass Bangladesh, detention Belarus, of Bosnia, the Uyghur population and its expanding coverage of the unrestCrimea, Estonia, in Myanmar. Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan,RFA’s 67.0 MILLION Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Burmese Service has emerged as a valuable source of independentNagorno-Karabakh, news, Pakistan, growing Russia, Serbia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, the percent of the population consuming its content fromUzbekistan. 6.2 percent Reflects audiences in 2018 for RFE/RL to 24.9 percent in 2020. and VOA. EAST AND SOUTHEAST ASIA Data from Burma, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam. Reflects 115.0 MILLION audiences for RFA and VOA. Near East, South and CentralSUB-SAHARAN Asia, AFRICA Eurasia Data from Benin, Botswana, Burundi, Central In Russia, South and Central Asia, and Eastern Europe,African RFE/RL Republic, and Cote d’Ivoire,VOA Democraticwill Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, continue to achieve impact70.9 through investigative MILLION reporting,Kenya, Liberia, exposing Madagascar, corruption, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Nigeria, Somalia, South Africa, malfeasance, and misconduct. South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe. Reflects audiences for VOA. ■ For example, RFE/RL’s Ukrainian Service serves as a media leader in Ukraine, frequently conducting high-profile interviews that are picked up across Ukraine’s top media outlets and airing its award-winning investigative programLATIN “Schemes: AMERICA Corruption in Details” to help root out Data from Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, and expose corruption in Ukraine. Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, 69.6 MILLION Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela. Reflects audiences for OCB and VOA. 2 ■ The RFE/RL and VOA joint venture, Current Time, continues to thrive as a source of Russian-language content, offering expert insights, fact-checks, infographics, and explainers on regional and international current events. As one of many examples of the role that USAGM has played in providing vital, truthful reporting on the COVID-19 pandemic to its audiences, VOA’s Russian Service produced a special video series debunking conspiracy theories and showing how doctors, nurses, patients, and teachers weathered the pandemic. ■ VOA and RFE/RL continue to partner on the multi-platform network VOA365 to reach Farsi-speakers in Iran and beyond. Although criminalized by Iran’s regime, VOA365 provides an unbiased alternative to state media critical of the United States electoral process. The network carried an eight hour live election night special, which had a record-setting 4.2 million views andMIDDLE 775,000 EAST interactions AND NORTH on AFRICA VOA Persian’s Instagram alone. The network’s special four hour 2021 United StatesData from presidential Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, inauguration coverage had nearly 3.5 million video viewsJordan, Kuwait, on Instagram. Lebanon, Libya, In Morocco, Palestinian Territories, addition, RFE/RL’s Farda31.7 (translated MILLION to “Tomorrow” Qatar,in Persian) Saudi Arabia, is Tunisia,a leader Turkey, UAE, Yemen. Reflects on digital platforms. Despite being officially blockedaudiences within for MBNIran, and VOA.Farda received 165 million visits to its websites and news app, as well as 477 million video views across social media networks in FY 2020. NEAR EAST, SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA, EURASIA Data from Afghanistan, Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bosnia, Crimea, Estonia, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, 67.0 MILLION Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Nagorno-Karabakh, Pakistan, Russia, Serbia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan. Reflects audiences for RFE/RL and VOA. EAST AND SOUTHEAST ASIA Middle East and North Africa Data from Burma, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam. Reflects From the aftermath of the 115.0catastrophic explosion MILLION in Beirutaudiences to the for renewed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inter-Media Agenda-Setting Effects in Ghana: Newspaper Vs. Online and State Vs
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2008 Inter-media agenda-setting effects in Ghana: newspaper vs. online and state vs. private Etse Godwin Sikanku Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Journalism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Sikanku, Etse Godwin, "Inter-media agenda-setting effects in Ghana: newspaper vs. online and state vs. private" (2008). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 15414. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/15414 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Inter-media agenda-setting effects in Ghana: newspaper vs. online and state vs. private by Etse Godwin Sikanku A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Journalism and Mass Communication Program of Study Committee: Eric Abbott (Major Professor) Daniela Dimitrova Francis Owusu Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2008 Copyright© Etse Godwin Sikanku, 2008. All rights reserved. 1457541 1457541 2008 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES iii LIST OF FIGURES iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v ABSTRACT vii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 1 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 4 The agenda-setting theory 4 Agenda-setting research in Ghana 4 Inter-media agenda-setting 5 Online News 8 State Ownership 10 Press history in Ghana 13 Research Questions 19 CHAPTER 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporting Facts: Free from Fear Or Favour
    Reporting Facts: Free from Fear or Favour PREVIEW OF IN FOCUS REPORT ON WORLD TRENDS IN FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND MEDIA DEVELOPMENT INDEPENDENT MEDIA PLAY AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN SOCIETIES. They make a vital contribution to achieving sustainable development – including, topically, Sustainable Development Goal 3 that calls for healthy lives and promoting well-being for all. In the context of COVID-19, this is more important than ever. Journalists need editorial independence in order to be professional, ethical and serve the public interest. But today, journalism is under increased threat as a result of public and private sector influence that endangers editorial independence. All over the world, journalists are struggling to stave off pressures and attacks from both external actors and decision-making systems or individuals in their own outlets. By far, the greatest menace to editorial independence in a growing number of countries across the world is media capture, a form of media control that is achieved through systematic steps by governments and powerful interest groups. This capture is through taking over and abusing: • regulatory mechanisms governing the media, • state-owned or state-controlled media operations, • public funds used to finance journalism, and • ownership of privately held news outlets. Such overpowering control of media leads to a shrinking of journalistic autonomy and contaminates the integrity of the news that is available to the public. However, there is push-back, and even more can be done to support editorial independence
    [Show full text]
  • China's Global Media Footprint
    February 2021 SHARP POWER AND DEMOCRATIC RESILIENCE SERIES China’s Global Media Footprint Democratic Responses to Expanding Authoritarian Influence by Sarah Cook ABOUT THE SHARP POWER AND DEMOCRATIC RESILIENCE SERIES As globalization deepens integration between democracies and autocracies, the compromising effects of sharp power—which impairs free expression, neutralizes independent institutions, and distorts the political environment—have grown apparent across crucial sectors of open societies. The Sharp Power and Democratic Resilience series is an effort to systematically analyze the ways in which leading authoritarian regimes seek to manipulate the political landscape and censor independent expression within democratic settings, and to highlight potential civil society responses. This initiative examines emerging issues in four crucial arenas relating to the integrity and vibrancy of democratic systems: • Challenges to free expression and the integrity of the media and information space • Threats to intellectual inquiry • Contestation over the principles that govern technology • Leverage of state-driven capital for political and often corrosive purposes The present era of authoritarian resurgence is taking place during a protracted global democratic downturn that has degraded the confidence of democracies. The leading authoritarians are ABOUT THE AUTHOR challenging democracy at the level of ideas, principles, and Sarah Cook is research director for China, Hong Kong, and standards, but only one side seems to be seriously competing Taiwan at Freedom House. She directs the China Media in the contest. Bulletin, a monthly digest in English and Chinese providing news and analysis on media freedom developments related Global interdependence has presented complications distinct to China. Cook is the author of several Asian country from those of the Cold War era, which did not afford authoritarian reports for Freedom House’s annual publications, as regimes so many opportunities for action within democracies.
    [Show full text]
  • Bbg), 2011-2015
    Description of document: FOIA Logs for the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), 2011-2015 Requested date: 02-March-2016 Released date: 06-May-2016 Posted date: 08-August-2016 Source of document: BBG FOIA Office Room 3349 330 Independence Ave. SW Washington, D.C. 20237 Fax: (202) 203-4585 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Broadcasting 330 Independence Ave.SW T 202.203.4550 Board of Cohen Building, Room 3349 F 202.203.4585 Governors Washington, DC 20237 Office ofthe General Counsel Freedom ofInformation and Privacy Act Office May6, 2016 RE: Request Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act-FOIA #16-035 This letter is in response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated March 2, 2016 to the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), which the Agency received on March 14, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted Certified By: William Fjricchio Professor of Compa Ive Media Studies Thesis Supervisor Signature Redacted Accepted By
    Manufacturing Dissent: Assessing the Methods and Impact of RT (Russia Today) by Matthew G. Graydon B.A. Film University of California, Berkeley, 2008 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE 2019 C2019 Matthew G. Graydon. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. S~ri' t A Signature red acted Department of Comparative 6/ledia Studies May 10, 2019 _____Signature redacted Certified by: William fJricchio Professor of Compa ive Media Studies Thesis Supervisor Signature redacted Accepted by: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Professor of Comparative Media Studies _OF TECHNOLOGY Director of Graduate Studies JUN 1 12019 LIBRARIES ARCHIVES I I Manufacturing Dissent: Assessing the Methods and Impact of RT (Russia Today) by Matthew G. Graydon Submitted to the Department of Comparative Media Studies on May 10, 2019 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies ABSTRACT The state-sponsored news network RT (formerly Russia Today) was launched in 2005 as a platform for improving Russia's global image. Fourteen years later, RT has become a self- described tool for information warfare and is under increasing scrutiny from the United States government for allegedly fomenting unrest and undermining democracy. It has also grown far beyond its television roots, achieving a broad diffusion across a variety of digital platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • ​Burundi Sourcing Profile
    ​Burundi Sourcing Profile Each week, researchers at the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) review dozens of English, French, and Kirundi language sources to code political violence and demonstration events across Burundi. To address challenges posed by the country’s media landscape, ACLED uses a wide range of source types from multiple regions with different methods and biases. Ongoing and deepening restrictions against local and foreign journalism have created obstacles to sourcing events in Burundi (RFI, 21 October 2019). Many international journalists are barred from ​ ​ working in the country, while local journalists experience limited access by the state, media shutdowns, imprisonment, or even attacks. 2019 protests against international journalism by supporters of the ruling party, the National Council for the Defense of Democracy–Forces for the ​ ​ Defense of Democracy (CNDD-FDD), and political decisions to restrict both international and domestic media have revealed the ruling party’s intolerance of media criticism (IWACU, 8 June ​ 2019). ​ Traditional media outlets (represented by the International, Regional, National, and Subnational Source Scales in the data) have been the targets of increased government censorship since 2015 (VOA, 29 March 2019), when the Burundi Crisis first began.1 International media outlets — such as ​ ​ Agence France Presse (AFP), the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), Radio France ​ Internationale (RFI), Voice of America (VOA), and Xinhua — formed a much larger portion of ​ ACLED’s coverage until 2015, with declining coverage since then. Regional news sources — such as All Africa, the East African (Kenya) and the Rwandan News Agency — have also been affected in light of increasing tensions and distrust between countries in the East African community (ISS ​ Africa, 24 May 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
    Case 1:20-cv-01710-BAH Document 4 Filed 06/25/20 Page 1 of 41 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OPEN TECHNOLOGY FUND, AMBASSADOR RYAN CROCKER, AMBASSADOR KAREN KORNBLUH, BEN SCOTT, MICHAEL W. KEMPNER, Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:20-cv-1710 v. The Honorable Beryl A. Howell, Chief Judge MICHAEL PACK, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Director of the U.S. Agency for Global Media, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DEEPAK GUPTA GUPTA WESSLER PLLC 1900 L Street, NW, Suite 312 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 888-1741 [email protected] June 25, 2020 Counsel for Plaintiffs Case 1:20-cv-01710-BAH Document 4 Filed 06/25/20 Page 2 of 41 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Statutory and factual background .................................................................................................... 5 Argument ........................................................................................................................................ 16 I. Open Technology Fund is likely to succeed on its claim that Pack lacks any legal authority whatsoever to remove its officers or directors. ......................... 16 II. The plaintiffs are likely to prevail on their claim that Pack’s attempted “governmental takeover” of all four private organizations is unlawful. .................. 21 III. The plaintiffs are likely
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Who We Are
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Who We Are The BBG is the independent federal government agency that oversees all U.S. civilian international media. This includes the Voice of America, Radio Estonia Russia Free Europe/Radio Liberty, the Latvia Office of Cuba Broadcasting, Radio Lithuania Belarus Free Asia, and the Middle East Ukraine Kazakhstan Broadcasting Networks, along with Moldova Bosnia-Herz. Serbia Kosovo Georgia Uzbekistan the International Broadcasting Mont. Macedonia Armenia Kyrgyzstan Turkey Azerbaijan Turkmenistan Albania Tajikistan Bureau. BBG is also the name of the Lebanon North Korea Tunisia Pal. Ter. Syria Afghanistan China board that governs the agency. Morocco West Bank & Gaza Iraq Iran Jordan Kuwait Algeria Libya Egypt Pakistan Western Sahara Saudi Bahrain Mexico Cuba Qatar Bangladesh Taiwan BBG networks are trusted news Haiti Arabia U.A.E. Burma Dominican Mauritania Mali Laos Cape Verde Oman sources, providing high-quality Honduras Republic Senegal Niger Sudan Eritrea Guatemala The Gambia Burkina Chad Yemen Thailand Vietnam Phillipines Nicaragua Guinea-Bissau Faso Djibouti journalism and programming to more El Salvador Venezuela Guinea BeninNigeria Cambodia Costa Rica Sierra Leone Ghana Central South Ethiopia Panama Liberia Afr. Rep. Sudan Somalia Togo Cameroon Singapore than 215 million people each week. Colombia Cote d’Ivoire Uganda Equatorial Guinea Congo Dem. Rep. Seychelles Ecuador Sao Tome & Principe Rwanda They are leading channels for Of Congo Burundi Kenya Gabon Indonesia information about the United States Tanzania Comoros Islands Peru Angola Malawi as well as independent platforms for Zambia Bolivia Mozambique Mauritius freedom of expression and free press. Zimbabwe Paraguay Namibia Botswana Chile Madagascar Mission: To inform, engage and connect people around the Swaziland South Lesotho Uruguay Africa world in support of freedom and democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Authoritarianism and the Global Threat to Free Speech Hearing
    DIGITAL AUTHORITARIANISM AND THE GLOBAL THREAT TO FREE SPEECH HEARING BEFORE THE CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 26, 2018 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available at www.cecc.gov or www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 30–233 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 VerDate Nov 24 2008 12:25 Dec 16, 2018 Jkt 081003 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\USERS\DSHERMAN1\DESKTOP\VONITA TEST.TXT DAVID CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Senate House MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Chairman CHRIS SMITH, New Jersey, Cochairman TOM COTTON, Arkansas ROBERT PITTENGER, North Carolina STEVE DAINES, Montana RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio TODD YOUNG, Indiana TIM WALZ, Minnesota DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California TED LIEU, California JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon GARY PETERS, Michigan ANGUS KING, Maine EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Not yet appointed ELYSE B. ANDERSON, Staff Director PAUL B. PROTIC, Deputy Staff Director (ii) VerDate Nov 24 2008 12:25 Dec 16, 2018 Jkt 081003 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 C:\USERS\DSHERMAN1\DESKTOP\VONITA TEST.TXT DAVID C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS Page Opening Statement of Hon. Marco Rubio, a U.S. Senator from Florida; Chair- man, Congressional-Executive Commission on China ...................................... 1 Statement of Hon. Christopher Smith, a U.S. Representative from New Jer- sey; Cochairman, Congressional-Executive Commission on China .................. 4 Cook, Sarah, Senior Research Analyst for East Asia and Editor, China Media Bulletin, Freedom House ..................................................................................... 6 Hamilton, Clive, Professor of Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University (Aus- tralia) and author, ‘‘Silent Invasion: China’s Influence in Australia’’ ............
    [Show full text]
  • Audit of Radio Free Asia Expenditures
    UNCLASSIFIED UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND THE BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUD-FM-IB-15-24 Office of Audits Jw1e2015 Audit of Radio Free Asia Expenditures IMPORTANT NOTICE: This report is intended solely for the official use of the Department of State or the Broadcasti ng Board of Governors, or any agency or organization receiving a copy d irectly from the Office of Inspector General. No secondary d istribution may be made, in whole or in part, outside the Department of State or the Broadcasting Board of Governors, by them or by other agencies or organizations, without prior authorization by the Inspector General. Public avail ability of the document wi ll be determined by the Inspector General under the U.S. Code, 5 U.S.C. 552. Im proper disclosure of this report may result in crim inal, civil, or administrative penalt ies. UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Acronyms BBG Broadcasting Board of Governors CFO Chief Financial Officer CFR Code of Federal Regulations IBB International Broadcasting Bureau OIG Office of Inspector General OMB Office of Management and Budget OTF Open Technology Fund RFA Radio Free Asia U.S.C. United States Code UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................1 Background…. .................................................................................................................................3 Objectives……. ...............................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Platform Labels & User Engagement on State-Backed Media Outlets
    Look Who’s Watching: Platform Labels & User Engagement on State-Backed Media Outlets Samantha Bradshaw, Stanford Internet Observatory, Stanford University Mona Elswah, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University Antonella Perini, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University Preprint Version. Paper accepted for publication at American Behavioural Scientist. Abstract (275) Recently, social media platforms have introduced several measures to counter misleading information. Among these measures are ‘state media labels’ which help users identify and evaluate the credibility of state-backed news. YouTube was the first platform to introduce labels that provide information about state-backed news channels. While previous work has examined the efficiency of information labels in controlled lab settings, few studies have examined how state media labels affect user perceptions of content from state-backed outlets. This paper proposes new methodological and theoretical approaches to investigate the effect of state media labels on user engagement with content. Drawing on a content analysis of 8,071 YouTube comments posted before and after the labelling of five state-funded channels (Al Jazeera English, CGTN, RT, TRT World, and Voice of America), this paper analyses the effect YouTube’s labels had on users’ engagement with state-backed media content. We found the labels had no impact on the amount of likes videos received before and after the policy introduction, except for RT which received less likes after it was labelled. However, for RT, comments left by users were associated with 30% decrease in the likelihood of observing a critical comment following the policy implementation, and a 70% decrease in likelihood of observing a critical comment about RT as a media source.
    [Show full text]
  • ENSURING a FUTURE for DETECTING INTERNET DISRUPTIONS a Field Survey of the Ecosystem Around Internet Censorship, Disruptions, and Shutdowns
    ENSURING A FUTURE FOR DETECTING INTERNET DISRUPTIONS A Field Survey of the Ecosystem Around Internet Censorship, Disruptions, and Shutdowns JUNE 2017 Acknowledgements About New America Thank you to the following for their contributions to this New America is committed to renewing American politics, work: Collin Anderson, Seamus Tuohy, Liz Woolery, Georgia prosperity, and purpose in the Digital Age. We generate big Bullen, and Enrique Piracés. ideas, bridge the gap between technology and policy, and curate broad public conversation. We combine the best of a policy research institute, technology laboratory, public Thank you also to the members of the internet forum, media platform, and a venture capital fund for measurement community who took the time to participate ideas. We are a distinctive community of thinkers, writers, in this research. researchers, technologists, and community activists who believe deeply in the possibility of American renewal. Find out more at newamerica.org/our-story. About OTI The Open Technology Institute (OTI) works at the intersection of technology and policy to ensure that every community has equitable access to digital technology and its benefits. We promote universal access to communications technologies that are both open and secure, using a multidisciplinary approach that brings together advocates, researchers, organizers, and innovators. Find out more at www.newamerica.org/oti. OPEN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE Contents Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Overview of the State of Shutdown Measurement 10 Introduction to Recommendations 15 Recommendations 18 Conclusion 31 Appendices 32 Notes 43 OPEN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY When it comes to the internet, we live in a world of of researchers that study internet censorship, contradictions.
    [Show full text]