DOCSLIB.ORG

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) ORDE “KNOW YOUR AGENCY” SERIES: DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY (DARPA) DARPA Site: https://www.darpa.mil/ AGENCY ORGANIZATION Reporting to the Secretary of Defense, DARPA works OVERVIEW independently from other defense research and The Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) was development activities. DARPA’s Director and Deputy created in February, 1958, in response to Soviet Union Director are responsible for setting agency-wide goals/ technological achievements including the Sputnik priorities, insuring a balanced investment portfolio, satellite. Later renamed the Defense Advanced Research approving new programs, and reviewing ongoing ones. Projects Agency (DARPA), it was authorized by President With about 220 employees, this is likely the only federal Dwight D. Eisenhower and tasked with “cultivating agency where almost half of the employees are hired with breakthrough technologies for national security.” the understanding they will be part of the agency for only (Source: DARPA About Us web page) three to five years. These “temporary” workers are the approximately 100 Program Managers (PMs) who are Specific Interests charged with overseeing some 250 R&D programs at the DARPA’s strategic priorities are four-fold: agency (Source: About DARPA web page). DARPA PMs 1. Rethink complex military systems are recruited from academia, industry, and government 2. Master the information explosion agencies, and are discipline experts. PMs define their 3. Harness biology as technology programs, set appropriate milestones, meet with their 4. Expand the technological frontier researchers, and track progress. They report to DARPA’s (Source: DARPA 2015, pp. 4-9) Technical Office Directors and Deputies who are Innovative technologies in which DARPA has been responsible for setting directions for their offices, hiring involved include both military (e.g., precision weapons, PMs, and overseeing program execution. DARPA’s six stealth technology) and civilian (e.g., internet, voice Technical Offices are: recognition, GPS receivers for small consumer products). • Biological Technologies Office (BTO) (Source: About DARPA web page) • Defense Sciences Office (DSO) Approach • Information Innovation Office (I2O) DARPA invests in technologies that can make major • Microsystems Technology Office (MTO) differences in US national security, partnering with • Strategic Technology Office (STO) academic, corporate, and government entities – what • Tactical Technology Office (TTO) DARPA terms their “innovation ecosystem.” All research efforts are outsourced as DARPA has no research GRANTS PROCESS facilities; rather, the agency provides “thought leadership, DARPA Technical Offices and Research Programs release community building frameworks, technology challenges, information about research interests and funding research management, funding, and other support opportunities in the form of Broad Agency elements” to meet their mission (Source: About DARPA Announcements (BAAs) and Research Announcements. web page). The agency refers to its “culture of innovation” Depending on the opportunity, investigators are and is known for “executing rapidly and effectively” encouraged or required to submit pre-proposals for (Source: DARPA 2015, p. 9). Identifying cutting-edge agency review prior to full proposal submission. Following objectives translates to investing in risk-taking research, a this, PIs receive brief feedback and encouragement to concept with which this agency is very familiar and submit (or not) a full proposal for agency consideration. comfortable. Every DARPA funding announcement carries the admonition that the agency seeks transformational Contact with DARPA Staff: versus evolutionary or incremental results in the projects DARPA recommends communication with their Program they support. Managers (PMs) early in the process, whether you are ©Office of Research Development and Education (ORDE), UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVERANSCHUTZ MEDICAL CAMPUS, 09/17 Please call ORDE at 303-315-5822 to discuss this sponsor further. responding to an agency-issued BAA or you would like to government employees; subject matter experts are not pitch a unique idea. Contact can be made by telephone, required to be. When the Review Team completes their email, or in-person (Source: Doing Business with DARPA, tasks, the Program Manager’s funding recommendations March 2017). Some DARPA offices hold Proposer Days or go to the SRO for concurrence and funding availability other types of events that bring current and potential determination. PMs then notify proposers of funding research collaborators to DARPA for a day or two. decisions. (Source: DARPA Guide to Broad Agency Attendees are provided information about the agency and Announcements and Research Announcements, Nov specific office, the particular solicitation, how best to 2016, p. 12). engage with DARPA, upcoming priorities, and one-on-one meetings (called “sidebars”) with relevant PMs. DARPA PROPOSAL & REVIEW PROCESS Typical DARPA Proposal Process: PI DETERMINES SUITABILITY OF PROJECT 1) PI determines suitability of proposed project in DARPA Research Programs Specific BAAs/RAs relation to DARPA Research Programs. PI CONTACTS DARPA PROGRAM MANAGER WITH QUESTIONS 2) PI contacts DARPA Program Manager with Via email, telephone or in-person questions concerning program priorities and application process. PI SUBMITS PRE-PREPROPOSAL 3) PI submits pre-proposal, if required. Generally reviewed by Program Manager 4) Brief feedback along with an invitation to submit a full proposal is provided by the PM. FULL PROPOSAL ENCOURAGED BY DARPA 5) PI submits full proposal via grants.gov. 6) Proposals go through the scientific/technical review process conducted by government PI SUBMITS FULL PROPOSAL VIA GRANTS.GOV personnel and subject matter experts, as needed. 7) Program Managers make final funding AGENCY SCIENTIFIC REVIEW PROCESS BEGINS recommendations to Scientific Review Officers Government reviewers Subject matter experts (typically the DARPA Technical Office Director). 8) Notification is provided to PI and institution PROGRAM MANAGER MAKES FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS concerning proposal status. 9) The DARPA Contracting Officer conducts the negotiation and award process with PI/institution RECOMMENDATIONS APPROVED BY SCIENTIFIC REVIEW OFFICER for approved project. PI/INSTITUTION NOTIFIED OF FUNDING STATUS Proposal Review Process: Negotiation and award process begins The DARPA Scientific Review Process is governed by general review criteria (overall scientific and technical INSTITUTION RECEIVES AWARD DOCUMENTATION merit, potential contribution/relevance to the agency’s mission, and cost realism), and is run by the Program What Happens Next? Manager. Pre-proposal review primarily takes place at the DARPA issues grants, cooperative agreements, and PM level although the PM may elect to include others in contracts – depending on the nature of the project. A the decision process. PMs also control the review process negotiation process between the receiving institution and for full proposals – determining proposals to be reviewed, DARPA precedes award; the DARPA Contracting Officer selecting the reviewers, often acting as a reviewer, and conducts these negotiations. Those who are turned down recommending proposals for award. Review Teams may request informal feedback sessions with the PM to consist of the Program Manager, selected reviewers, discuss strengths and weaknesses of the proposed subject matter experts, and the Scientific Review Officer project. (Source: DARPA Guide to Broad Agency (SRO) who is usually the DARPA Technical Office Director Announcements and Research Announcements, Nov (to whom the PM reports). Reviewers must be 2016, p. 12). ©Office of Research Development and Education (ORDE), UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVERANSCHUTZ MEDICAL CAMPUS, 09/17 Please call ORDE at 303-315-5822 to discuss this sponsor further. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DARPA and Data: a Portfolio Overview
    DARPA and Data: A Portfolio Overview William C. Regli Special Assistant to the Director Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Brian Pierce Director Information Innovation Office Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Fall 2017 Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited) 1 DARPA Dreams of Data • Investments over the past decade span multiple DARPA Offices and PMs • Information Innovation (I2O): Software Systems, AI, Data Analytics • Defense Sciences (DSO): Domain-driven problems (chemistry, social science, materials science, engineering design) • Microsystems Technology (MTO): New hardware to support these processes (neuromorphic processor, graph processor, learning systems) • Products include DARPA Program testbeds, data and software • The DARPA Open Catalog • Testbeds include those in big data, cyber-defense, engineering design, synthetic bio, machine reading, among others • Multiple layers and qualities of data are important • Important for reproducibility; important as fuel for future DARPA programs • Beyond public data to include “raw” data, process/workflow data • Data does not need to be organized to be useful or valuable • Software tools are getting better eXponentially, ”raw” data can be processed • Changing the economics (Forensic Data Curation) • Its about optimizing allocation of attention in human-machine teams Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited) 2 Working toward Wisdom Wisdom: sound judgment - governance Abstraction Wisdom (also Understanding:
    [Show full text]
  • Space and Defense Issue
    SPACE and DEFENSE Volume Nine Number One Spring 2016 Attack on the Brain: Neurowars and Neurowarfare Armin Krishnan Volume Five Number One Brazil Space: SGDC Satellite Sum Gills Vilar Lopes mer 2011 Mexico Aerospace: The Querétaro Cluster Mónica Casalet REVIEW: Crowded Orbits Coalitions in Space:Deron Jackson Where Networks are PowerPublisher’s Corner: Space Policy’s SALT Moment Ambassadorby James Roger G. ClayHarrison Moltz The 2010 National Space Policy: Down to Earth? by Joan Johnson-Freese Space & Defense Journal of the United States Air Force Academy Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies Publisher Ambassador Roger Harrison, [email protected] Inaugural Director and Co-founder, Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies Editor Dr. Damon Coletta U.S. Air Force Academy, USA Associate Editors Mr. Deron Jackson Dr. Peter Hays Director, Eisenhower Center George Washington University, USA U.S. Air Force Academy, USA Ms. Jonty Kasku-Jackson National Security Space Institute, USA Dr. Schuyler Foerster U.S. Air Force Academy, USA Thank You to Our Reviewers Andrew Aldrin Joanne Gabrynowicz United Launch Alliance, USA University of Mississippi, USA James Armor Jason Healey ATK, USA Atlantic Council, USA William Barry Theresa Hitchens NASA Headquarters, USA United Nations, Switzerland Daniel Blinder Wade Huntley UNSAM-CONICET, Argentina Independent Researcher, USA Dean Cheng Ram Jakhu Heritage Foundation, USA McGill University, Canada, USA Robert Callahan Dana Johnson NORAD-NORTHCOM, USA Department of State, USA Robert Carriedo Roger Launius U.S. Air Force Academy, USA National Air and Space Museum Frans von der Dunk John Logsdon University of Nebraska, USA George Washington University, USA Paul Eckart Agnieszka Lukaszczyk Boeing, USA Secure World Foundation, Belgium Andrew Erickson Molly Macauley Naval War College, USA Resources for the Future, USA Laura Delgado Lopez Dimitrios Stroikos Secure World Foundation, USA London School of Economics, United Kingdom Adam Lowther Brent Talbot SANDS, Kirtland AFB, USA U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Broad Agency Announcement Computational Cultural Understanding (CCU) Information Innovation Office HR001121S0024 April 29, 2021 TABLE of CONTENTS
    Broad Agency Announcement Computational Cultural Understanding (CCU) Information Innovation Office HR001121S0024 April 29, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART II: FULL TEXT OF ANNOUNCEMENT ...........................................................................4 I. Funding Opportunity Description ............................................................................................4 A. Program Overview ............................................................................................................4 B. Program Structure .............................................................................................................6 C. Program Metrics..............................................................................................................10 D. Deliverables ....................................................................................................................12 E. Intellectual Property........................................................................................................13 II. Award Information.................................................................................................................13 A. General Award Information............................................................................................13 B. Fundamental Research ....................................................................................................14 III. Eligibility Information........................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Policy Newsletter - March 3, 2020
    3/4/2020 Defense Policy Newsletter - March 3, 2020 Subscribe Past Issues Translate This message was prepared by Lewis-Burke Associates LLC. DEFENSE POLICY NEWSLETTER March 3, 2020 | Lewis-Burke Associates LLC IN THIS ISSUE VIEW FROM THE HILL HASC Holds Second Future of Defense Task Force Hearing on “Supercharging the Innovation Base” HASC Members React to DOD’s FY 2021 Request in First Budget Hearing NATIONAL SECURITY NEWS President Trump Releases FY 2021 Budget Request; Prioritizes Near-Term Military Capabilities DOD Faces Continued Turmoil with Additional Leadership Changes U.S. Officials Warn of Threats to U.S. Universities and Economy at CSIS China Initiative Conference DOD Adopts Defense Innovation Board’s Recommendations for AI Principles FUNDING AND ENGAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES https://mailchi.mp/588b1109957d/uf7g4ldspd-2705191?e=2d0d056c11 1/13 3/4/2020 Defense Policy Newsletter - March 3, 2020 DOD Releases FOA for BioIndustrial Manufacturing Innovation Institute Subscribe Past Issues Translate FY 2021 Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) BAA Department of Defense Releases FY 2021 Defense University Research Instrumentation Program (DURIP) BAA DARPA BTO Announces June 3-4 Biotech Summit DARPA DSO Announces June 24-25 Discover DSO Day DARPA DSO Announces Habitus Program BAA DARPA DSO Announces Proposers Day for High Enthalpy Aperture Technology (HEAT) Program DARPA DSO Announces Proposers Day for Rational Integrated Design of Energetics (RIDE) Program DARPA DSO Announces Proposers Day for Invisible Headlights Program
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Vision in Radical Technological Innovation A
    THE VALUE OF VISION IN RADICAL TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Tammy L. Carleton September 2010 © 2011 by Tammy Lee Carleton. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/mk388mb2729 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Larry Leifer, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Riitta Katila I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chuck House Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii THE VALUE OF VISION IN RADICAL TECHNOLOGICAL INVENTION ABSTRACT Is a technological vision needed to drive radical or disruptive innovations? Few studies have discussed a possible relationship between the formation of a technological vision and the sustained creation of radical innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • DARPA Robotics Challenge Proposers'
    DARPA Robotics Challenge Proposers’ Day April 16, 2012 DARPA Robotics Challenge Proposers’ Day The Proposers’ Day will begin at 12:10 PM EDT April 16, 2012 2 DARPA Robotics Challenge Proposers’ Day Dr. Gill Pratt Program Manager, DARPA 3 DARPA Robotics Challenge Proposers’ Day Agenda 12:00PM-12:10PM Set up/Test Connection 12:10PM-12:15PM Introductory Remarks, OSTP Dr. John Holdren, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology and Director of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) 12:15PM-12:25PM Introductory Remarks, Dr. Kaigham J. Gabriel, Acting Director, DARPA DARPA 12:25PM-12:40PM DARPA/TTO Overview Mr. Paul Eremenko, Acting Director/Deputy Director, DARPA TTO 12:40PM-1:40PM Robotics Challenge Overview Dr. Gill Pratt, Program Manager, DARPA 1:40PM-1:55PM Contracts Management Mr. Chris Glista, Contracting Officer, DARPA 1:55PM-2:10PM GFE Hardware Dr. Robert Playter, Boston Dynamics, Inc. 2:10PM-2:25PM GFE Software Mr. Nate Koenig, Open Source Robotics Foundation, Inc. 2:25PM-2:45PM Break 2:45PM-3:15PM Q/A Response 3:15PM Adjourn 4 Introductory Remarks, OSTP Dr. John Holdren Assistant to the President for Science and Technology and Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) 5 Dr. John Holdren VIDEO 4/16/2012 Further dissemination only as directed by DARPA Public Release Center or higher DoD authority. 6 Introductory Remarks, DARPA Dr. Kaigham J. Gabriel Acting Director, DARPA 7 Dr. Kaigham J. Gabriel VIDEO 4/16/2012 Further dissemination only as directed by DARPA Public Release Center or higher DoD authority. 8 DARPA/TTO Overview Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges for America's Defense Innovation
    The Challenges for America’s Defense Innovation BY DAN STEINBOCK NOVEMBER 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................. 3 The State of U.S. Defense Innovation ........................................................... 4 U.S. Military Expenditures in International Perspective ........................................... 4 A (Very) Short History of U.S. Defense R&D ......................................................... 5 Key Defense R&D Actors .............................................................................. 9 Department of Defense ........................................................................................... 9 Department of Energy ........................................................................................... 12 DOD Labs and University Affiliated Research Centers (UARCs) .......................... 12 Department of Homeland Security ........................................................................ 12 Defense Contractors .................................................................................... 14 Reconfiguration of Defense and Aerospace Industry .............................................. 14 Defense Contractors and Public/Private Partnerships ............................................ 14 New Public-Private Partnerships ............................................................................ 15 Defense Innovation at the Crossroads .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IMTEC-90-21 Submarine Technology
    * , ,’ -m United States Generai Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee a9 GAO on Projection Forces and Regional Defense, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate February 1990 SUBMARINE TECHNOLOGY. Transition Plans Needed to Realize Gains From DOD Advanced Resewch . United States General Accounting Office Washington, D.C. 20648 Information Management and Technology Division B-238018 February 14,199O The Honorable Edward M. Kennedy Chairman, Subcommittee on Projection Forces and Regional Defense Committee on Armed Services United States Senate Dear Mr. Chairman: Your office requested that we (1) describe research efforts underway by the Department of Defense’s Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) on innovative submarine technologies, (2) assess plans for tran- sitioning the research to the Navy for further development and imple- mentation on submarines, and (3) determine whether the Navy is planning flexibility into the SSN-21 SEAWOLF attack submarine and its combat system to incorporate these technologies. DARPA serves as the central research organization for the Department of Defense, performing various research projects designed to address many hardware, software, and technological issues facing the military today. Congress established the Advanced Submarine Technology Program (AWP) in December 1987, to be executed by the Secretary of Defense through the Director of DARPA. The program was set up in light of the declining United States advantage in submarine technology. Congress directed that the ASTP program should explore innovative state-of-the- art technologies and establish a submarine technology base. The Congress has appropriated $303 million for ASTPfor fiscal years 1988 through 1990. As of December 1989, DARPA had obligated $194 million and expended an estimated $117 million.’ Under the ASW program, DARPA is conducting technology research that could significantly improve submarine performance and increase the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • DOD Report to Congree
    Defense Nanotechnology Research and Development Program December 2009 Department of Defense Director, Defense Research & Engineering Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 I. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 II. Goals and Challenges ........................................................................................ 2 III. Plans .................................................................................................................. 4 IV. Progress ............................................................................................................. 6 A. The United States Air Force ........................................................................ 6 1. Air Force Devices and Systems ............................................................. 6 Photon-Plasmon-Electron Conversion Enables a New Class of Imaging Cameras ................................................................................ 6 2. Air Force Nanomaterials ........................................................................ 6 Processing of Explosive Formulations With Nano-Aluminum Powder ................................................................................................ 6 3. Air Force Manufacturing ....................................................................... 7 Uncooled IR Detector Made Possible With Controlled Carbon Nanotube Array ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vfw Post Surgeon Report
    VFW POST 1260 BEMIDJI, MN SURGEON/SERVICE OFFICER’S REPORT August 2017 VFW Action Corps Weekly July 28, 2017 In This Issue: 1. VFW Elects New National Leadership 2. Funding Agreement Reached for Choice Program and VA 3. VFW Lauds Unanimous House Passage of Forever GI Bill 4. Veterans Legislation Roundup 5. VFW Participates in Congressional Opioid Roundtable 6. VFW Hosts Panel Discussion on Women Veterans 7. MIA Update Download a PDF version of this week's Action Corps Weekly. 1. VFW Elects New National Leadership: The 118th VFW National Convention ended Wednesday in New Orleans with the election of Keith E. Harman as the new VFW commander-in-chief for the year 2017-2018. During his acceptance speech, the Delphos, Ohio, native spoke of the relevance of the nearly 1.7 million members of the VFW and its Auxiliary, that, "every member of our great organization has walked the talk, and every member of our great Auxiliary has lived the fear of having a loved one downrange." He said he is proud to be part of an organization that exists to take care of veterans, service members and their families, and that he is honored to lead it. His theme for his year is "Service not Self," and his goals are to end sequestration, to fully fund the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency, to demand better leadership, management and accountability from the Department of Veterans Affairs and to help reduce the veteran suicide crisis to zero. Also elected were Senior Vice Commander-in-Chief Vincent “B.J.” Lawrence of Alamogordo, N.M., and Junior Vice Commander-in-Chief William J.
    [Show full text]
  • {FREE} the Pentagons Brain: an Uncensored History of DARPA
    THE PENTAGONS BRAIN: AN UNCENSORED HISTORY OF DARPA, AMERICAS TOP-SECRET MILITARY RESEARCH AGENCY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Annie Jacobsen | 560 pages | 24 Sep 2015 | Little, Brown & Company | 9780316349475 | English | New York, United States The Pentagons Brain: An Uncensored History of DARPA, Americas Top-Secret Military Research Agency PDF Book It was in this rough ocean that the U. And she is a great storyteller, making the tantalizing tale of The Pentagon's Brain -- from the depths of the Cold War to present day -- come alive on every page. About the Author. Each section held amazing information such as the hydrogen bomb information in the first section and the three foot cement walls that warbled like jello. Techniques Off. The last and final test -- on September 6, , involved a misfire in high winds and an explosion at an altitude of miles. Rise of the Machines I read a lot of horror, fantasy, and SF. She explores the implications of DARPA work on technology that will not be widely known to the public for generations but will certainly impact national security and concepts of war. She overall does not vilify DARPA only cites Eisenhower's admonishment to beware the military-industrial - academic complex. The military services, however, were adamantly opposed. Annie did an amazing job of telling a story while educating you on a fascinating subject. In Drinking in America, bestselling author Susan Cheever chronicles our national love affair with liquor, Biological weapons. May 28, Brittany rated it it was amazing Shelves: military , non-fiction , 5-stars , reviews , zchallenge , biographical. Know this, the R and D offices of the Military do not have the mandate to find a way to make wounded veterans whole again, their job is advanced weapons and war winning strategy Couple that with brain and cyborg research and it should give you some idea of where the agency is going.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation and Transition: DARPA's Role in Fostering an Emerging Revolution in Military Affairs Volume 1
    INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES Transformation and Transition: DARPA’s Role in Fostering an Emerging Revolution in Military Affairs Volume 1 – Overall Assessment Richard H. Van Atta, Project Leader and Michael J. Lippitz with Jasper C. Lupo Rob Mahoney Jack H. Nunn April 2003 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. IDA Paper P-3698 Log: H 03-000693 Copy This work was conducted under contract DASW01 98 C 0067, Task DA-6-2018, for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The publication of this IDA document does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official position of that Agency. © 2003 Institute for Defense Analyses, 4850 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia 22311-1882 • (703) 845-2000. This material may be reproduced by or for the U.S. Government pursuant to the copyright license under the clause at DFARS 252.227-7013 (Nov. 95). INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES IDA Paper P-3698 Transformation and Transition: DARPA’s Role in Fostering an Emerging Revolution in Military Affairs Volume 1 – Overall Assessment Richard H. Van Atta, Project Leader and Michael J. Lippitz with Jasper C. Lupo Rob Mahoney Jack H. Nunn PREFACE This report summarizes work performed by the Institute for Defense Analyses for the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), in partial fulfillment of the task entitled “DARPA’s Role in Fostering a Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA).” It highlights the roles DARPA has played since the 1970s in developing and exploiting advanced technological systems to create fundamental warfighting advantages for US military forces.
    [Show full text]