DOCSLIB.ORG

Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Environmental Assessment Document Initial Environmental Examination Grant Number: 0093 NEP February 2010 Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program Chame-Khangsar Road Subproject, Manang District Prepared by the Government of Nepal The Environmental Assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Government of Nepal Ministry of Local Development Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program [ADBGrant 0093NEP] Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Report Of Chame-Khangsar Road Subproject Manang District Submitted to: Ministry of Local Development Government of Nepal Proponent: District Development Committee/ District Technical Office Chame,manang February, 2010 Prepared By: District Implementation Support Team (DIST) BDA Nepal. Ltd. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................iii Executive Summary In Nepali ................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary In English .................................................................................................vii Salient Features ......................................................................................................................... x 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Name And Address Of Proposal ............................................................................... 1 1.3 Relevancy Of The Proposal ............................................................................................. 1 1.4 Construction Approach ..................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Public Consultation And Information Disclosure .......................................................... 2.1 Public Consultation ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Information Disclosure ........................................................................................................ 3.0 Review Of Relevant Acts, Regulations And Guidelines .............................................. 6 4.0 Existing Environmental Condition................................................................................... 4.1 Physical Environment ....................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Biological Environment ..................................................................................................... 9 4.3 Socio-Economic And Cultural Environment ..................................................................... 9 5.0 Project Alternatives ....................................................................................................... 13 5.1 No Action Option ............................................................................................................ 13 5.2 Proposal Alternatives ..................................................................................................... 13 5.3 Alternative Alignment ..................................................................................................... 13 5.4 Alternative Design And Construction Approach ............................................................. 13 5.5 Alternative Schedule And Process ................................................................................. 13 5. 6 Alternative Resources .................................................................................................... 13 6.0 Identification Of Impacts And Benefit Augmentation/Mitigation Measures ............ 14 6.1 Mitigation Measures During Pre-Construction Phase .................................................... 14 6. 2 Beneficial Impacts And Benefit Augmentation Measures .............................................. 14 6. 3 Adverse Impacts And Mitigation Measures .................................................................... 16 7.0 Environmental Management Plan ........................................................................... 22 7.1 Institutions And Their Roles ........................................................................................... 22 7.2. Reporting And Documentation ....................................................................................... 23 7.3. Environmental Management Plan .................................................................................. 23 7.4. Mitigation Cost ................................................................................................................ 29 7.5. Implementation Of Mitigation Measures ......................................................................... 29 7.6. Environmental Monitoring ............................................................................................... 30 8.0 Conclusion And Recommendations .......................................................................... 8.1 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 34 8.2 Recommendation ........................................................................................................... 34 i 9.0 Miscellaneous ........................................................................................................... 35 ANNEXES ................................................................................................................................ 36 Annex I: Terms Of Reference ............................................................................................... 1 Annex II: Rapid Environmental Assessment (Rea) Checklist ................................................ 1 Annex III: Abstract Of Cost ..................................................................................................... 3 Annex IV: Rrrsdp Environmental Checklist ............................................................................. 5 Annex V: Public Notice ........................................................................................................... 9 Annex VI: Deed Of Enquiry (Muchulka) ................................................................................ 10 Annex VII: Name Of The Organizations ................................................................................. 11 Annex VIII: List Of Persons Consulted .................................................................................... 11 Annex IX: Summary Of Meeting Minutes With Local People ................................................ 12 Annex X: Recommendation Letters From Vdcs ................................................................... 13 Annex XI 14 Annex XII: List Of Trees To Be Removed .............................................................................. 18 Annex XIII: Photographs ......................................................................................................... 20 Annex XIV: Summary Of Cross Drainage Structures .............................................................. 21 Annex XV: Affected Houses And Structures Along The Road Alignment .............................. 22 Annex XVI: Structure For Slope Stabilization .......................................................................... 22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Description Pages Fig. 3.1 Location Map Fig. 7.1 Environmental Management Organizational Structure LIST OF TABLES Table No. Description Pages Table 3.1 Salient Features of the Road Table 3.2 Summary of Works and Materials Estimated to carry out the Project Table 3.3 Topography, Geomorphology and Geology of the Road Alignment Table 6.1 Likely Beneficial Impacts and Proposed Enhancement Measures Table 6.2 Likely Adverse Impacts and Proposed Mitigation Measures Table 7.1 Monitoring Indicators Selected for this IEE Table 7.2 Compliance Monitoring for Chame -Khngsar.. Road Rehabilitation Works Table 7.3 Impact / Effect Monitoring for the Chame-Khangsar Road Rehabilitation Works Table 7.4 Costs for Resettlement and Land Acquisition Table 7.5 Costs for Community Awareness and Livelihood Training Table 7.6 Costs for Environmental Monitoring Table 7.7 Cost of Environmental Mitigation and Social Safeguard Measures ii ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank IUCN International Union for Conservation amsl Above mean sea level Nature AP Affected Person Km Kilometer BG Building Group LDO Local Development Officer Ch Chainage LEP Labour based, environment friendly and CBO Community Based Organization participatory CDC Compensation Determination Committee LEST Livellhood Enhancement and Skill CDO Chief District Officer Training CEA Country Environmental Analysis LRMP Land Resource Management Project CGI Corrugated Galvanized Iron M meter CF Community Forest MoU Memorandum of Understanding CFUG Community Forest Users Group MoE Ministry of Environment CISC Central Implementation Support MoST Ministry of Science and Technology Consultants Ml Milliliter CITES Convention on International Trade in MLD Ministry of
Recommended publications
  • Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area Cggk"0F{ ;+/If0f If]Qsf :Tgwf/L Jgohgt' Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area - 2019

    Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area Cggk"0F{ ;+/If0f If]Qsf :Tgwf/L Jgohgt' Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area - 2019

    Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area cGgk"0f{ ;+/If0f If]qsf :tgwf/L jGohGt' Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area - 2019 ISBN 978-9937-8522-8-9978-9937-8522-8-9 9 789937 852289 National Trust for Nature Conservation Annapurna Conservation Area Project Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal Hariyo Kharka, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal National Trust for Nature Conservation P.O. Box: 3712, Kathmandu, Nepal P.O. Box: 183, Kaski, Nepal Tel: +977-1-5526571, 5526573, Fax: +977-1-5526570 Tel: +977-61-431102, 430802, Fax: +977-61-431203 Annapurna Conservation Area Project Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: www.ntnc.org.np Website: www.ntnc.org.np 2019 Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area cGgk"0f{ ;+/If0f If]qsf :tgwf/L jGohGt' National Trust for Nature Conservation Annapurna Conservation Area Project 2019 Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area cGgk"0f{ ;+/If0f If]qsf :tgwf/L jGohGt' Published by © NTNC-ACAP, 2019 All rights reserved Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit NTNC-ACAP. Reviewers Prof. Karan Bahadur Shah (Himalayan Nature), Dr. Naresh Subedi (NTNC, Khumaltar), Dr. Will Duckworth (IUCN) and Yadav Ghimirey (Friends of Nature, Nepal). Compilers Rishi Baral, Ashok Subedi and Shailendra Kumar Yadav Suggested Citation Baral R., Subedi A. & Yadav S.K. (Compilers), 2019. Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area. National Trust for Nature Conservation, Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara, Nepal. First Edition : 700 Copies ISBN : 978-9937-8522-8-9 Front Cover : Yellow-bellied Weasel (Mustela kathiah), back cover: Orange- bellied Himalayan Squirrel (Dremomys lokriah).
  • January, 2017 Musk Deer, an Endangered and IUCN Appendix I Listed Animal Species, Is Crepuscular

    January, 2017 Musk Deer, an Endangered and IUCN Appendix I Listed Animal Species, Is Crepuscular

    Project update: January, 2017 Musk deer, an endangered and IUCN Appendix I listed animal species, is crepuscular (active during dawn or dusk). Being a small mammal, and residing on a dense cover, it is mostly inconspicuous. But the most notable indicator in its habitat are its latrines. Therefore, this project has identified that latrines should be the prime focus for musk deer study and conservation. In this context, we have collected fresh latrine samples and will assess the population through the DNA study. The preliminary scientific visit has been accomplished; during the visit, we have identified five Village Development Committees (VDCs) - Pisang, Manang, Bharka, Nawal, Ghyaru and Khangsar - as the potential habitats of the musk deer in the Manang district, Annapurna Conservation Area. Among them, forests of Pisang and Manage were intensively surveyed and fresh latrines were also collected. Further, from each site, we had collected fresh latrines for the five times and the total latrines were collected in 10 days. Fresh latrine samples were collected every morning, 7-11 am. Collected fresh latrine samples were stored in different tubes containing ethanol and silica separately. We had collected 126 samples, in total, and sent to laboratory for further analysis. Furthermore, p otential habitat of these two VDCs were categorised into three types of forests viz. pine forest (Pinus wallichina dominanted), Mixed forest (Abies, Pinus wallichina and Betula utilits all are present) and Betula forest (Betula utilis dominated). During the preliminary visit, a musk deer was found to be killed by poachers and the pod was already removed from the body; sorrowfully, the deer was hung in a tree.
  • A Case Study from Nepal

    A Case Study from Nepal

    Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 13 (July 2017) Documenting Variation in Endangered Languages ed. by Kristine A. Hildebrandt, Carmen Jany, and Wilson Silva, pp. 152-179 http://nlfrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ 8 http://handle.net/24753 Areal Analysis of Language Attitudes and Practices: A Case Study from Nepal Kristine A. Hildebrandt and Shunfu Hu Southern Illinois University Edwardsville This paper has two aims. One aim is to consider non-structural (language attitude and use) variables as valid in the field of dialect and linguistic geography in an inner Himalayan valley of Nepal, where four languages have traditionally co- existed asymmetrically and which demonstrate different degrees of vitality vs. endangerment. The other aim is an application of modified spatiality as it aligns with speaker attitudes and practices amidst recent and ongoing socio-economic and population changes. We demonstrate that variation in self-reported attitudes and practices across languages in this region can be explained as much with adjusted spatial factors (labeled ‘social space’) as with traditional social factors (e.g. gender, age, formal education, occupation, etc.). As such, our study contributes to a dis- course on the role and potential of spatiality in sociolinguistic analyses of smaller language communities. 1. INTRODUCTION. In a recent paper on sampling in dialectology research, Buchstaller and Alvanides lament that until recently, “The majority of sociolinguistic work [could] be described as spatially naïve, using geographical space merely as a canvas…on to which the results of linguistic analysis [could] be mapped.” (2013: 96). This need for inclusion and testing of different types of spatial factors alongside social ones is increasingly being addressed in regions like the United States and Great Britain.
  • Hariyo Ban Program Ii

    Hariyo Ban Program Ii

    HARIYO BAN PROGRAM II Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) Plan Date: [April 4, 2017] Version: Final [Contract/Agreement] Number: [AID-367-A-16-00008] Activity Start Date and End Date: [July 15, 2016 to July 14, 2021] Submitted by: [WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC] [Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal] Tel: [977 1-4410942] Email: [[email protected]] This document was produced for review by the1 United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by WWF Nepal. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. © WWF 2016 All rights reserved Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part must mention the title and credit WWF. Published by WWF Nepal PO Box: 7660 Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal T: +977 1 4434820, F: +977 1 4438458 [email protected], www.wwfnepal.org/hariyobanprogram Disclaimer This plan is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronoyms and Abbreviation ........................................................... 2 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 4 2. Hariyo Ban II Conceptual Model and Result Framework ..................... 5 3. Theory of Change ................................................................................
  • Selected Individual Responses: Khangsar MM3

    Selected Individual Responses: Khangsar MM3

    Selected Individual Responses: Khangsar_MM3 Interview carried out on 16 June, 7:30 pm Khangsar VDC, ward no 2, Khangsar, Nepal Audio recording with Marantz PMD660 and Audio-Technica omnidirectional stereo hand- held microphone General and Personal Information 1. What is your name? Pema Ongkel Gurung 2. What is your age? 43 3. What is your mother-tongue? Ngisjanba 4. From what clan are you? Gurung- caste, Lamchhane - clan 5. What languages do you speak now in your regularly daily life? More Ngisjanpa, less Nepali. 6. Where were you born and how long did you live there? Khangsar VDC – 2. 7. Do you live in Kathmandu all year through? 3 months in winter. 8. Does your whole immediate family live in Kathmandu? Parents in Kathmandu. 9. How frequently do you return to your village? After 3 months. 10. How long do you stay in village? 9 months. 11. How often do you travel outside of your village? Sometimes goes to Pokhara because his son studies there. 12. Where do you typically go to, or for what purpose? Sometimes goes to Pokhara because his son studies there. 13. Which months do you travel in usually? - 14. Are your parents living now? Both living. 15. Where are your parents from? Are their mother-tongue languages the same as yours? If not, what are their mother-tongue languages? Both from Khangsar. 16. Do you have siblings? Are you the eldest, or the youngest, or are you in the middle? 6 children. He is fifth child. 17. When you were a child, what languages did you speak with your siblings? Nepali.
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal

    Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal

    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
  • To Livestock Predation by Snow Leopards?

    To Livestock Predation by Snow Leopards?

    animals Article What Factors Predispose Households in Trans-Himalaya (Central Nepal) to Livestock Predation by Snow Leopards? Mahesh P. Tiwari 1,*, Bishnu P. Devkota 1, Rodney M. Jackson 2, Bir Bahadur Khanal Chhetri 1 and Sistata Bagale 3 1 Institute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Pokhara 33700, Nepal; [email protected] (B.P.D.); [email protected] (B.B.K.C.) 2 Snow Leopard Conservancy, Sonoma, CA 95476, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Copenhagen, Denmark; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Received: 25 August 2020; Accepted: 26 September 2020; Published: 23 November 2020 Simple Summary: Conflict between snow leopards and humans across the trans-Himalaya is a pressing conservation concern. Conflict severely impacts the socio-economy of the local pastoralist community and threatens snow leopard survival. We investigated the socio-economic factors influencing such conflict and pastoralist attitudes towards snow leopard conservation using semi-structured interviews for a better understanding of what factors influence the variability in losses among the households in the Narphu valley, Nepal. While snow leopards caused significant losses to impoverished pastoralist households, respondents were generally accepting of their presence due to religious reasons and strict law enforcement. We observed poor herding and guarding practices with households owning larger numbers of total livestock (especially large bodied animals like yak (Bos mutus f. grunniens) and cattle (B. primigenius f. taurus)), which resulted in the higher loss. Further, compensation and insurance schemes were dysfunctional, with few households insuring their livestock and receiving compensation for depredated livestock over the past two years.
  • Manaslu Circuit Trek

    Manaslu Circuit Trek

    Thamel, Kathmandu, Nepal | URL: www.actual-adventure.com Manaslu Circuit Trek Overview This is one of the most happening and remarkable Himalayan journey that goes across Budi Gandaki, passing stunning valley with astonishing view of Manaslu and crossing the famous Larkya La pass with contrast with Sama region before returning via Marshyangdi. Despite of its grand natural beauty, it receives few trekkers compared to other established trekking route in Annapurna and Everest region. Trekking through the villages inhibited by Buddhist community and the most isolated areas surrounding Makalu Base Camp are the adrenaline pumping parts of the trek. We will travel to the borderland of Tibet, experience and witness Tibetan culture and lifestyle, view regal mountain vista and walk in the dense forest compiling this one of a kind Himalayan journey. Itinerary Day 1: Kathmandu Arrival As soon as you land on the Tribhuwan International Airport our representative will pick you and transfer to the hotel. In the evening there will be briefing about the trek. Day 2: Kathmandu Sightseeing Today we will start the day by visiting Pashupatinath temple which is situated 5km east of Kathmandu in the bank of holy Bagmati River. Pashupatinath is a pagoda shaped temple with tiered golden roofs and silver doors. Only the Hindu’s can visit the temple, but the visitors can clearly see the temple and activities performed in the temple premises from the eastern bank of Bagmati River where the dead bodies are cremated. From here we will visit Boudhanath Stupa which is located 8km east of Kathmandu. Boudhanath stupa is dome shaped monument representing the mind of Buddha and pilgrimage destination for Tantric Buddha.
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The phenomenon of climate change is generally understood as a long term significant change in the average weather patterns of the region or the earth as a whole. It mainly involves changes in the variability or average state of the temperature, precipitation and wind patterns over durations ranging from decades to millions of years. UNFCCC defines it as 'a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere'. Today the world is experiencing climate change and there is the scientific consensus that the increase in the Green House Gas concentrations in the atmosphere has caused to global climate change. Nepal's average temperature is rising at the - C per annum between 1977 and 1994 with a higher rate in mountain century. In addition to increase in extreme temperature, weather has been observed changing in recent years. Because of the extreme temperature, there has been change in weather conditions. Number of monsoon days has been shortening, with early onset and late withdrawal, and the intensity of monsoon rain has shown increasing trend (Gurung and Bhandari 2009). Livelihood of third world's people has been changing and threatening from climate change. The term climate change is often used interchangeably with the term global warming but according to the National Academy of Sciences the phrase 'climate change' is growing in preferred use to 'global warming' because it helps to convey meaning of other terms related to climate change in addition to rising temperatures. Climate change refers to any significant change in measures of climate (such as temperature, precipitation or wind) lasting for an extended period, decade or longer.
  • Focused COVID-19 Media Monitoring, Nepal

    Focused COVID-19 Media Monitoring, Nepal

    Focused COVID-19 Media Monitoring, Nepal Focused COVID-19 Media Monitoring Nepal1 -Sharpening the COVID-19 Response through Communications Intelligence Date: June 16, 2021 Kathmandu, Nepal EMERGING THEME(S) • Nepal reported 1,681 new COVID-19 cases , 41 deaths on June 15; a total of 3,790 COVID-deaths were recorded in month of Jestha (May-June), the highest since the start of the pandemic; infection has not come down, just less number of tests being done, says health expert; 21 persons from Rawatbada village return home from isolation center after recovering from COVID-19; ex PM Jhalanath Khanal admitted in hospital for assumed post-COVID-19 symptoms • Government arranges free treatment for mucormycosis patients if infected while undergoing treatment for COVID-19 • Health Ministry to buy 12,000,000 doses of COVID-19 vaccine • Experts call for an equitable vaccination program; Family Welfare Division concede disregard for government directives leading to massive misappropriation in ongoing vaccination drive; tanker drivers withdraw protest, will be given COVID- 19 vaccine from June 16 • Bridge at Manang’s Timang waterfall washed away by May 27 flood leading to difficulties in delivery of healthcare materials to the district hospital RECURRING THEME(S) • Attacks on women and children have gone up during the pandemic, 53 such cases reported daily across the country on an average 1 This intelligence is tracked through manually monitoring national print, digital and online media through a representative sample selection, and consultations with media persons and media influencers. WHE Communications Intelligence 2 ISSUE(S) IN FOCUS Nepal reported 1,681 new COVID-19 cases on June 15, and 41 deaths.
  • Nepal Customary Right Reportpdf

    Nepal Customary Right Reportpdf

    Documentation and assessing customary practices of managing forest resources at local level REDD Implementation Centre Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Babar Mahal, Kathmandu, Nepal August 25, 2015 Produced by Nav Raj Baral Produced for REDD Implementation Centre, Ministry of Forests and SoilConservation, Nepal Copyright © REDD Implementation Centre, Ministry of Forests andSoil Conservation, Nepal Version Final Disclaimer: Although the REDD Implementation Centre, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Nepal, commissioned this study, neither the REDD IC nor the government assumes any responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information in the report. ii Acknowledgements Many individuals and institutions have contributed to this study and made it possible for me to complete this assignment. Therefore, I wish to thank all community members and respondents of Sankhuwsabha, Panchthar, Jhapa, Bara and Sarlahi, Sindhuli, Dolkha, Sindhuplachowk, Chitwan, Nawalparasi, Jumla, Kailali and Doti districts for sharing their views and insights, as well as their time and hospitality. I am very much grateful to REDD Implementation Centre, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation Babarmahal for entrusting me with this assignment and providing necessary technical and institutional support related to the assignment. It has helped a lot to enrich my knowledge and skills on this important subject and also to work with a number of government officials, professional scholars, farmers and their networks. I would like to offer special thanks to Mr. Man Bahadur Khadaka, Chief REDD IC and also to Mr. Rajnedra Kafley, the former REDD IC Chief and all officials of REDD. I would like to thank in particular Dr. Narendra Chand, Mr.Mohan Khanal, and Mr.
  • Stream Water Survey Along the Annapurna Circuit, Nepal

    Stream Water Survey Along the Annapurna Circuit, Nepal

    Himalayan Journal of Development and Democracy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2011 Stream water survey along the Annapurna Circuit, Nepal Rhona Scott Ryerson University Abstract This paper focuses on stream water testing that took place on the Marshyangdi River, Jharsang Khola and the Kali Gandaki River that are located along the Annapurna Circuit Trek within the Annapurna Conservation Area. Sampling was undertaken from May 16, 2011 to May 28, 2011. A total of 7 samples were taken from the Marshyangdi River, 1 sample from a branch of the Marshyangdi River ( Jharsang Khola), and 5 from the Kali Gandaki River at various accessible points along the trek. An effort was made to sample both upstream and downstream of a village to assess any difference between the two results. Analysis was conducted 3+ - for Aluminum (Al ), free Chlorine (Cl), Iron (Fe), Nitrite (NO 2 ), and - + Nitrate (NO 3 ), Ammonia (NH 3/NH 4 ), General Hardness (Ca and Mg) and the presence of Coliform and E. coli. The results for the concentrations of aluminum, chlorine, and iron are all higher at sites upstream from Tal and Manang relative to downstream concentrations. This indicates that the variations are not likely related to inputs from villages but most likely the result of local geology or upstream agricultural activity. Nitrite was detected in higher concentrations at sites downstream of both Tal and Manang relative to upstream concentrations. This could indicate an anthropogenic influence from villages. The results for hardness (Ca and Mg) do not have higher concentrations at downstream sites and overall concentrations are high. The variations here are most likely the result of differences in local geology from the calcareous formations associated with the Central Himalayan Thrust.