DOCSLIB.ORG

Still the Leading Antidepressant After 40 Years of Randomised Controlle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Still the Leading Antidepressant After 40 Years of Randomised Controlle BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY "2001), 178, 129^144 REVIEW ARTICLE Amitriptyline vv.therest:stilltheleading METHOD Inclusion criteria antidepressant after 40 years of randomised All RCTs comparing amitriptyline with any y other tricyclic,heterocyclic or SSRI were in- controlled trials cluded. Crossover studies were excluded. Studies adopting any criteria to define CORRADO BARBUI and MATTHEW HOTOPF patients suffering from depression were included; a concurrent diagnosis of another psychiatric disorder was not considered an exclusion criterion. Trials in patients with depression with a concomitant medical ill- Background Tricyclic antidepressants Amitriptyline is one of the first `reference' ness were not included in this review. have similar efficacy and slightly lower tricyclic antidepressants TCAs). Over the past 40 years a number of newer tricyclics, tolerability than selective serotonin Search strategy heterocyclics and selective serotonin re- Relevant studies were located by searching reuptakeinhibitorsreuptake inhibitors SSRIs).However, uptake inhibitors SSRIs) have been intro- the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, there are no systematic reviews assessing duced Garattini et aletal,1998). Despite Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials several large systematic reviews comparing amitriptyline, the reference tricyclic drug, Register CCDANCTR). This specialised tricyclics and SSRIs there is no clear agree- vv. other tricyclics and SSRIs directly. register is regularly updated by electronic ment over first-line treatment of depression Medline,Embase,PsycINFO,LILACS, SongSong et aletal,1993; Anderson & Tomenson, Aims ToreviewTo review the tolerability and Psyndex,CINAHL,SIGLE) and non-electro- 1995; Montgomery & Kasper,1995; efficacy of amitriptyline inthe nicnicliterature searches. The register was HotopfHotopf et aletal,1996; Canadian Coordinating management of depression. searched using the following terms: Office for Health Technology Assessment, AMITRIPTYLIN**AMITRIPTYLIN oror AMITRILAMITRIL oror ELA-ELA- 19971997aa). Grouped as a whole,tricyclics MethodMethod Asystematic review of TROLTROL oror ELAVILELAVIL oror EMITRIPEMITRIP oror ENDEPENDEP appear to have similar efficacy to SSRIs, oror ENOVILENOVIL oror LAROXYL oror LENTIZOL randomised controlled trials RCTs) but are slightly less well tolerated. If toler- oror LEVATELEVATE oror MEVARILMEVARIL oror NOVOTRIP- comparing amitriptyline with other ability is measured according to the TYNTYN oror SAROTENSAROTEN oror TRYPTALTRYPTAL oror numbers of drop-outs occurring in random- tricyclics/heterocyclics or with an SSRI. TRYPTIZOL oror TRIPTAFEN*.TRIPTAFEN*. A specific ised controlled trials RCTs),the number electronic search was also performed with ResultsResults Wereviewed186 RCTs.The needed to treat NNT) with SSRIs to Medline and Embase from 1966 to 1998. prevent one tricyclic-related drop-out is overallestimate ofthe efficacy of We used the search term: AMITRIP-AMITRIP- estimated at 33 Anderson & Tomenson, amitriptyline revealed a standardised TYLINETYLINE andand RANDOMISED CON- 1995). This modest advantage has to be mean difference of 0.147 95% CI 0.05^ TROLLED TRIAL oror RANDOM ALLO- set against the increased cost of SSRIs CATIONCATION oror DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD..METHOD 0.243), significantly favouring Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Reference lists of relevant papers and pre- Technology Assessment,1997 bb). A meta-meta-).A amitriptyline.The overall OR for dropping vious systematic reviews were hand analysis which subdivided TCAs according out was 0.99 95% CI 0.91^1.08) and that searched for published reports and citations to whether they were reference compounds for side-effects was 0.62 95% CI 0.54^ of unpublished research. Finally,attempts e.g. the oldest TCAs,amitriptyline and were made to obtain data through direct 0.70), favouring the control drugs.With imipramine) or newer tricyclics or hetero- contact with the pharmaceutical industry. drop-outsincluded as treatmentfailures, cyclics,suggested that the higher drop-out thetheestimateoftheeffectivenessof estimate ofthe effectiveness of rates associated with tricyclics could be Outcomes amitriptyline vv. tricyclics/heterocyclics and attributed to the effect of amitriptyline and imipramine ± newer tricyclics and Efficacy was evaluated using the following SSRIs showed a 2.5% difference in the heterocyclics were no worse than the SSRIs outcome measures: proportion of responders in favour of HotopfHotopf et aletal,1997). However,there have a)a)NumberNumber of patients who responded to amitriptyline number needed to treat 40, not been any systematic reviews assessing treatment out of the total number of CI 21^694;21^694;OR1.12 OR1.12 95% CI1.01^1.24)). amitriptyline v.v. other tricyclics and hetero- randomised patients. cyclics directly. We therefore aimed to test Conclusions Amitriptyline is less well the hypothesis that amitriptyline would be b)b)GroupGroup mean scores at the end of the trial on Hamilton Depression Rating tolerated thantricyclics/heterocyclics and less well tolerated than other tricyclics and SSRIs,and also to assess its effective- Scale HDRS; Hamilton,1960),or SSRIs, but slightly more patients treated Montgomery and AAsbergÊ sberg Depression ness compared with the alternatives. on it recover than on alternative Scale MADRS; Montgomery & Ê antidepressants. AAsberg,1979),orsberg,1979),or any other depression scale.scale. Declaration of interest None.None. Tolerability was evaluated using the ySee editorial, pp. 99^100, thisissue. following outcome measures: 129129 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 02 Oct 2021 at 06:16:27, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use. BARBUI & HOTOPF a)a)NumberNumber of patients failing to complete inevitably excluded most drop-out patients. nortriptyline in combination with fluphena- the study as a proportion of the total Therefore,scores from continuous out- zine. One trial compared amitriptyline with number of randomised patients. comes were analysed on an end-point basis, nortriptyline plus fluphenazine. including only patients with a final assess- Although all trials reported that b)b)NumberNumber of patients complaining of ment or with an LOCF to the final assess- patients had been randomly allocated,in side-effects out of the total number of ment. Tolerability data were analysed by six cases the concealment of allocation randomised patients. calculating the proportion of patients who was inadequate with some bias possible. failed to complete the study and who In four studies only physicians,but not Data extraction experienced adverse reactions out of the patients,were blind to treatments,in nine total number of randomised patients. For cases neither physicians nor patients were Using a standard form two reviewers inde- each outcome measure three separate blind,while the other 173 studies were pendently extracted information on the year meta-analyses were planned. The firstThefirst double-blind. The median sample size was of publication,concealment of allocation, compared amitriptyline with tricylic/hetero- 50 patients 10% percentile 24,25% per- blindness,length of treatment,inclusion cri- cyclic antidepressants,the second amitripty-amitripty- centile 40,75% percentile 80,90% percen- teria,age range,country and setting of the line with SSRIs and the third analysis tile 153; range 10±531). The median length study and type of pharmacologicalpharmacological interven- summarised the overall comparison of ami- of trials was four weeks 25% percentile 4, tion. The number of patientsundergoing the triptyline with both tricyclic/heterocyclic 50% percentile 4,75% percentile 6; range randomisation procedure,the number of drugs and SSRIs. 3±12); the number of studies with more patients who failed to complete the study Dichotomous outcomes were sum- than four weeks of follow-up increased drop-outs) and that of patients complain- marised by calculating a Peto-weighted from 28 30%) to 62 67%) after 1980. ing of side-effects were recorded. For odds ratio for each study,together with In 67 trials 36%) authors adopted diag- dichotomous outcomes the number of the 95% CI. An overall odds ratio was then nostic criteria and a specification of severity patients showing a 50% reduction in score calculated as a summary measure. The of depression to enrol patients; in 55 trials on the HDRS or MADRS scale was ex- number of patients who need to be treated 30%) authors adopted only a specification tracted; if these figures were not available, NNT) with amitriptyline rather than the of severity,while in the remaining 34% of we extracted the number of patients cate- control antidepressants for one additional studies patients were enrolled on the basis gorised as `much improved' and `improved' patient to benefit NNTB) or be harmed of physicians' implicit criteria to define on the Clinical Global Impression scale NNTH) was calculated with the 95% CI patients with depression or because they CGI; Guy,1976),or the number of patients Altman,1998). Heterogeneity of treatment were judged to require antidepressant in the corresponding categories of any other effects between studies was tested using the therapy. Fifty-nine per cent of studies pub- rating scale if the CGI was not used. For ww22 statistic. Continuous outcomes were lished before 1980 used implicit criteria vv.. continuous outcomes the mean scores at analysed by calculating a standardised 9.6% of those published after this date. end-point on the HDRS and the number weighted mean difference SMD) for each Overall,108 trials
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Still the Leading Antidepressant After 40
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY "2001), 178, 129^144 REVIEW ARTICLE Amitriptyline vv.therest:stilltheleading METHOD Inclusion criteria antidepressant after 40 years of randomised All RCTs comparing amitriptyline with any y other tricyclic,heterocyclic or SSRI were in- controlled trials cluded. Crossover studies were excluded. Studies adopting any criteria to define CORRADO BARBUI and MATTHEW HOTOPF patients suffering from depression were included; a concurrent diagnosis of another psychiatric disorder was not considered an exclusion criterion. Trials in patients with depression with a concomitant medical ill- Background Tricyclic antidepressants Amitriptyline is one of the first `reference' ness were not included in this review. have similar efficacy and slightly lower tricyclic antidepressants TCAs). Over the past 40 years a number of newer tricyclics, tolerability than selective serotonin Search strategy heterocyclics and selective serotonin re- Relevant studies were located by searching reuptakeinhibitorsreuptake inhibitors SSRIs).However, uptake inhibitors SSRIs) have been intro- the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, there are no systematic reviews assessing duced Garattini et aletal,1998). Despite Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials several large systematic reviews comparing amitriptyline, the reference tricyclic drug, Register CCDANCTR). This specialised tricyclics and SSRIs there is no clear agree- vv. other tricyclics and SSRIs directly. register is regularly updated by electronic ment over first-line treatment of depression Medline,Embase,PsycINFO,LILACS, SongSong et aletal,1993; Anderson & Tomenson, Aims ToreviewTo review the tolerability and Psyndex,CINAHL,SIGLE) and non-electro- 1995; Montgomery & Kasper,1995; efficacy of amitriptyline inthe nicnicliterature searches. The register was HotopfHotopf et aletal,1996; Canadian Coordinating management of depression. searched using the following terms: Office for Health Technology Assessment, AMITRIPTYLIN**AMITRIPTYLIN oror AMITRILAMITRIL oror ELA-ELA- 19971997aa).
    [Show full text]
  • Dosulepin Prescribing
    SAFETY BULLETIN: DOSULEPIN PRESCRIBING In December 2007, the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued safety advice around prescribing of dosulepin, related to the narrow margin between therapeutic doses and potentially fatal doses. Nevertheless, dosulepin continues to be prescribed widely. Over eight years after the safety advice was published, prescribing of dosulepin in the Dorset area remains high. In the South West area, Dorset CCG was the highest prescriber of dosulepin for the 2015/16 financial year (3.238% of all antidepressant items). Of the 209 CCGs in the UK, Dorset is the fourteenth highest prescriber of dosulepin, and well above the national average of 2.111%. The following points summarise the reasons that dosulepin is not recommended for prescribing nationally, and in Dorset: Dosulepin has a small margin of safety between the (maximum) therapeutic dose and potentially fatal doses. The NICE guideline on depression in adults recommends that dosulepin should not be prescribed for adults with depression because evidence supporting its tolerability relative to other antidepressants is outweighed by the increased cardiac risk and toxicity in overdose. Dosulepin has also been used ‘off label’ in other indications such as fibromyalgia and neuropathic pain. However the evidence for use in in this way is weak, and is not recommended. The lethal dose of dosulepin is relatively low and can be potentiated by alcohol and other CNS depressants. Dosulepin overdose is associated with high mortality and can occur rapidly, even before hospital treatment can be received. Onset of toxicity occurs within 4-6 hours. Every year, up to 200 people in England and Wales fatally overdose with dosulepin.
    [Show full text]
  • Dose Equivalents of Antidepressants Evidence-Based Recommendations
    Journal of Affective Disorders 180 (2015) 179–184 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Affective Disorders journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jad Research report Dose equivalents of antidepressants: Evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials Yu Hayasaka a,n, Marianna Purgato b, Laura R Magni c, Yusuke Ogawa a, Nozomi Takeshima a, Andrea Cipriani b,d, Corrado Barbui b, Stefan Leucht e, Toshi A Furukawa a a Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo- ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan b Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico “G.B.Rossi”, Pzz.le L.A. Scuro, 10, Verona 37134, Italy c Psychiatric Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Centro San Giovanni di Dio, Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy d Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK e Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany article info abstract Article history: Background: Dose equivalence of antidepressants is critically important for clinical practice and for Received 4 February 2015 research. There are several methods to define and calculate dose equivalence but for antidepressants, Received in revised form only daily defined dose and consensus methods have been applied to date. The purpose of the present 10 March 2015 study is to examine dose equivalence of antidepressants by a less arbitrary and more systematic method. Accepted 12 March 2015 Methods: We used data from all randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose trials comparing fluoxetine or Available online 31 March 2015 paroxetine as standard drugs with any other active antidepressants as monotherapy in the acute phase Keywords: treatment of unipolar depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (Pips) for Older People (Modified from ‘STOPP/START 2’ O’Mahony Et Al 2014)
    Appendix A: Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (PIPs) for older people (modified from ‘STOPP/START 2’ O’Mahony et al 2014) Consider holding (or deprescribing - consult with patient): 1. Any drug prescribed without an evidence-based clinical indication 2. Any drug prescribed beyond the recommended duration, where well-defined 3. Any duplicate drug class (optimise monotherapy) Avoid hazardous combinations e.g.: 1. The Triple Whammy: NSAID + ACE/ARB + diuretic in all ≥ 65 year olds (NHS Scotland 2015) 2. Sick Day Rules drugs: Metformin or ACEi/ARB or a diuretic or NSAID in ≥ 65 year olds presenting with dehydration and/or acute kidney injury (AKI) (NHS Scotland 2015) 3. Anticholinergic Burden (ACB): Any additional medicine with anticholinergic properties when already on an Anticholinergic/antimuscarinic (listed overleaf) in > 65 year olds (risk of falls, increased anticholinergic toxicity: confusion, agitation, acute glaucoma, urinary retention, constipation). The following are known to contribute to the ACB: Amantadine Antidepressants, tricyclic: Amitriptyline, Clomipramine, Dosulepin, Doxepin, Imipramine, Nortriptyline, Trimipramine and SSRIs: Fluoxetine, Paroxetine Antihistamines, first generation (sedating): Clemastine, Chlorphenamine, Cyproheptadine, Diphenhydramine/-hydrinate, Hydroxyzine, Promethazine; also Cetirizine, Loratidine Antipsychotics: especially Clozapine, Fluphenazine, Haloperidol, Olanzepine, and phenothiazines e.g. Prochlorperazine, Trifluoperazine Baclofen Carbamazepine Disopyramide Loperamide Oxcarbazepine Pethidine
    [Show full text]
  • Product List March 2019 - Page 1 of 53
    Wessex has been sourcing and supplying active substances to medicine manufacturers since its incorporation in 1994. We supply from known, trusted partners working to full cGMP and with full regulatory support. Please contact us for details of the following products. Product CAS No. ( R)-2-Methyl-CBS-oxazaborolidine 112022-83-0 (-) (1R) Menthyl Chloroformate 14602-86-9 (+)-Sotalol Hydrochloride 959-24-0 (2R)-2-[(4-Ethyl-2, 3-dioxopiperazinyl) carbonylamino]-2-phenylacetic 63422-71-9 acid (2R)-2-[(4-Ethyl-2-3-dioxopiperazinyl) carbonylamino]-2-(4- 62893-24-7 hydroxyphenyl) acetic acid (r)-(+)-α-Lipoic Acid 1200-22-2 (S)-1-(2-Chloroacetyl) pyrrolidine-2-carbonitrile 207557-35-5 1,1'-Carbonyl diimidazole 530-62-1 1,3-Cyclohexanedione 504-02-9 1-[2-amino-1-(4-methoxyphenyl) ethyl] cyclohexanol acetate 839705-03-2 1-[2-Amino-1-(4-methoxyphenyl) ethyl] cyclohexanol Hydrochloride 130198-05-9 1-[Cyano-(4-methoxyphenyl) methyl] cyclohexanol 93413-76-4 1-Chloroethyl-4-nitrophenyl carbonate 101623-69-2 2-(2-Aminothiazol-4-yl) acetic acid Hydrochloride 66659-20-9 2-(4-Nitrophenyl)ethanamine Hydrochloride 29968-78-3 2,4 Dichlorobenzyl Alcohol (2,4 DCBA) 1777-82-8 2,6-Dichlorophenol 87-65-0 2.6 Diamino Pyridine 136-40-3 2-Aminoheptane Sulfate 6411-75-2 2-Ethylhexanoyl Chloride 760-67-8 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate 24468-13-1 2-Isopropyl-4-(N-methylaminomethyl) thiazole Hydrochloride 908591-25-3 4,4,4-Trifluoro-1-(4-methylphenyl)-1,3-butane dione 720-94-5 4,5,6,7-Tetrahydrothieno[3,2,c] pyridine Hydrochloride 28783-41-7 4-Chloro-N-methyl-piperidine 5570-77-4
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for Managing Sexual Dysfunction Induced by Antidepressant Medication
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003382.pub3 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Taylor, M. J., Rudkin, L., Bullemor-Day, P., Lubin, J., Chukwujekwu, C., & Hawton, K. (2013). Strategies for managing sexual dysfunction induced by antidepressant medication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (5). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003382.pub3 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/0065218A1 Migeon Et Al
    US 2005.0065218A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/0065218A1 Migeon et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 24, 2005 (54) UTILIZATION OF ALVERINE, ALONE OR IN (30) Foreign Application Priority Data COMBINATION WITH TRICYCLC ANTDEPRESSANT OR A SPECIFIC Jun. 13, 2003 (FR).............................................. O307176 SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITOR FOR Apr. 30, 2004 (FR).............................................. O404639 THE TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION Publication Classification (76) Inventors: Jacques Migeon, Seattle, WA (US); Frederic Revah, Paris (FR) (51) Int. C.7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A61K 31/137 (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 514/649 Correspondence Address: SESD LARDNER (57) ABSTRACT 3000 KSTREET NW WASHINGTON, DC 20007 (US) The present invention relates to the utilization of Alverine or its metabolites, alone or in combination with a tricyclic (21) Appl. No.: 10/866,079 antidepressant or a Specific Serotonin reuptake inhibitor, for the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions for the (22) Filed: Jun. 14, 2004 treatment of depression. 80 120 OO 8 O 6 O 40 20 t Excipicnts Alverine Alverine Alverine Imiprannine (1% methylcellulose) Citate Citrate Citrate 10 mg/kg 3 mg/kg 10 mg/kg 30 mg/kg Patent Application Publication Mar. 24, 2005 Sheet 1 of 4 US 2005/0065218 A1 Excipients Alverine Alveline Alveline Inipramine (1% methylcellulose) Citrate Citrate Citrate 10 mg/kg 3 mg/kg 10 mg/kg 30 mg/kg Fi gure US 2005/0065218A1 Imipramine 30 mg/kg Figure 2 Patent Application Publication Mar. 24, 2005 Sheet 3 of 4 US 2005/0065218A1 20 Vehicle + Whicule -- Averine Alvérine Vehicule + Alverine Vehicule imipramine 3 ring/kg it 3 mg/kg t- Impramine 10 mg/kg + 3 mg/kg Wellicule imipramine 10 mg/kg Vehicule 3 mg/kg Figure 3 Patent Application Publication Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Dosulepin in Tension Type Headache and Midfacial Pain a Randomised Controlled Study
    IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 19, Issue 3 Ser.4 (March. 2020), PP 10-14 www.iosrjournals.org Efficacy of Dosulepin in Tension Type Headache and Midfacial Pain a Randomised Controlled Study Corresponding Author: XXXXX Abstract Introduction: Patients presenting with pain in the facial region are commonly reffered to Otorhinolaryngologist. Due to the various causative factors causing pain in the facial region, the proper diagnosis and more importantly the skill to rule out the sinogenic pain plays an important role in management. Tension type headache and midfacial pain are often misdiagnosed and treated wrongly and thus add to the morbidity of patients. Of all the medications that are used for the treatment, most provide minimal, short term relief with side effects on prolong use. Dosulepin a Tricyclic Antidepressant helps in relieving pain with minimal side effects as compared to other Tricyclic Antidepressants. Aims and Objective: To study the efficacy of dosulepin in patients attending outpatient Department of otorhinolaryngology of Silchar Medical College and Hospital Methods: 130 patients attending outpatient Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery of Silchar Medical College & Hospital, from September 2017 to August 2018 with complaints of headache diagnosed as tension type headache and midfacial pain were evaluated. Neurological and radiographic examinations were performed prior to therapy and local cause of pain in the facial region were ruled out. Together with this we also performed psychic evaluation for those patients who could not be withdrawn from current medication and then to start them on our current medication.
    [Show full text]
  • MODERN INDICATIONS for the USE of OPIPRAMOL Krzysztof Krysta1, Sławomir Murawiec2, Anna Warchala1, Karolina Zawada3, Wiesław J
    Psychiatria Danubina, 2015; Vol. 27, Suppl. 1, pp 435–437 Conference paper © Medicinska naklada - Zagreb, Croatia MODERN INDICATIONS FOR THE USE OF OPIPRAMOL Krzysztof Krysta1, Sławomir Murawiec2, Anna Warchala1, Karolina Zawada3, Wiesław J. Cubała4, Mariusz S. Wiglusz4, Katarzyna Jakuszkowiak-Wojten4, Marek Krzystanek5 & Irena Krupka-Matuszczyk1 1Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland 2“Dialogue” Therapy Centre, Warsaw, Poland 3Department of Pneumonology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland 4Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland 5Department of Rehabilitation Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland SUMMARY Opipramol is considered as a pharmacological agent that does not fit the classification taking into account the division of antidepressants, antipsychotics and anxiolytics. It has a structure related to tricyclic antidepressants but it has a different mechanism of action, i.e. binding to sigma1 and to sigma2 sites. It has been regarded as an effective drug in general anxiety disorders together with other agents like SSRI`s, SNRI`s, buspirone and pregabalin for many years. It can however also be indicated in other conditions, e.g. it may be used as a premedication in the evening prior to surgery, positive results are also observed in psychopharmacological treatment with opipramol in somatoform disorders, symptoms of depression can be significantly reduced in the climacteric syndrome. The latest data from literature present also certain dangers and side effects, which may result due to opipramol administration. Mania may be induced not only in bipolar patients treated with opipramol, but it can be an adverse drug reaction in generalized anxiety disorder. This analysis shows however that opipramol is an important drug still very useful in different clinical conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Opipramol and Trifluoperazine in the Treatment of Anxiety and Tension
    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO ANTIHISTAMINES 395 In table VI are given the results of a question directed at discovering how effective the preferred treatment was compared to any other antihistamine used. Fifteen patients only were able to give this information but the results are interesting. Discussion TABLE VI The design of this study was very simple as COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUSLY USED ANTIHISTAMINE such studies must be if they are to be completed under the conditions of a busy general practice. In a condition such as hay fever where anti- Worse As good Better Total histamines are known to be etfective and where fairly rapid symptomatic relief is needed by the 2 4 9 15* patient, we did not feel justified in including a placebo. The results of the study seem fairly *In the majority of patients the previously used clear-cut that if patients are offered the choice antihistamine was the chemically related chlor- of a plain form of this antihistamine or a long- pheniramine maleate B.P. acting form more will choose the latter. Ofthose that do so, however, only about a third find a single tablet at night completely effective, the remainder have to take one further tablet during the day. Both forms of antihistamine are effective and where a retrospective comparison can be made this effectiveness is considered greater or equal to that of previously administered anti-histamines. Summary A simple comparative study under general-practice conditions of two formulations of pheniramine is described. Sixty-one per cent of patients preferred the long-acting form of this antihistamine.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Instrumentation and Consumable Catalog 2 INSTRUMENTATION and CONSUMABLE CATALOG
    PRODUCT CATALOG 2019 Instrumentation and Consumable Catalog 2 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONSUMABLE CATALOG Resolvex® A200 Part Numbers: A200 96: 253-1160 Resolvex® A200 96 Resolvex A200 Standalone work station for automated sample preparation. The compact benchtop offers the one stop solution for automating sample preparation utilizing creation of multiple work flows, and programmable dispensing of up to 11 solvents. Along with its innovative positive pressure system leading to clean samples, improving accuracy, throughput and enhancing the Life time of your analytical instrument. The A200 comes with an easy to use touch screen interface allowing for easy set up of multiple work flows. In addition the light curtain safety feature will release gas pressure when manifold is activated to prevent any injuries. INSTRUMENTATION AND CONSUMABLE CATALOG 3 Resolvex® A100 Part Numbers: A100 96: 253-0019 A100 48: 253-0014 Resolvex® A100 Standalone work station for automated sample preparation. The compact benchtop offers the one stop solution for automating sample preparation utilizing creation of multiple work flows, and programmable dispensing of up to 11 solvents. Along with its innovative positive pressure system leading to clean samples, improving accuracy, throughput and enhancing the Life time of your analytical instrument. The A100 comes in 96 and 4 configuration allowing for for automated Work Flow solutions in multiple SPE formats. 4 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONSUMABLE CATALOG Resolvex® M10 96/M10 96 XT/M10 48 Part Numbers: M10 96 XT: 288-0006 M10 96: 288-0001 M10 48: 289-0004 Resolvex® M10 Standalone work station for Positive Pressure solid phase extraction. The manual Resolvex M10 48 and 96 are positive pressure manifold for 1, 3, and 6 ml cartridges, or 1ml 96 well plates.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychotropic Medication Concerns When Treating Individuals with Developmental Disabilities
    Tuesday, 2:30 – 4:00, C2 Psychotropic Medication Concerns when Treating Individuals with Developmental Disabilities Richard Berchou 248-613-6716 [email protected] Objective: Identify effective methods for the practical application of concepts related to improving the delivery of services for persons with developmental disabilities Notes: Medication Assistance On-Line Resources OBTAINING MEDICATION: • Needy Meds o Needymeds.com • Partnership for Prescriptions Assistance o Pparx.org • Patient Assistance Program Center o Rxassist.org • Insurance coverage & Prior authorization forms for most drug plans o Covermymeds.com REMINDERS TO TAKE MEDICATION: • Medication reminder by Email, Phone call, or Text message o Sugaredspoon.com ANSWER MOST QUESTIONS ABOUT MEDICATIONS: • Univ. of Michigan/West Virginia Schools of Pharmacy o Justaskblue.com • Interactions between medications, over-the-counter (OTC) products and some foods; also has a pictorial Pill Identifier: May input an entire list of medications o Drugs.com OTHER TRUSTED SITES: • Patient friendly information about disease and diagnoses o Mayoclinic.com, familydoctor.org • Package inserts, boxed warnings, “Dear Doctor” letters (can sign up to receive e- mail alerts) o Dailymed.nlm.nih.gov • Communications about drug safety o www.Fda.gov/cder/drug/drugsafety/drugindex.htm • Purchasing medications on-line o Pharnacychecker.com Updated 2013 Psychotropic Medication for Persons with Developmental Disabilities April 23, 2013 Richard Berchou, Pharm. D. Assoc. Clinical Prof., Dept. Psychiatry & Behavioral
    [Show full text]