Racial Ambiguity and the Social Construction of Race in the US

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Racial Ambiguity and the Social Construction of Race in the US “WHAT ARE YOU?”: RACIAL AMBIGUITY AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF RACE IN THE U.S. Starita Smith, BA, MA Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2012 APPROVED: George Yancey, Major Professor Erma Lawson, Minor Professor Amie Moore, Committee Member AnaLouise Keating, Committee Member Daniel Rodeheaver, Chair of the Department of Sociology Thomas Evenson, Dean of the College of Public Affairs and Community Service James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Smith, Starita “What are you?”: Racial ambiguity and the social construction of race in the U.S. Doctor of Philosophy (Sociology), May 2012, 165 pp., 3 tables, 5 figures, references, 111 titles. This dissertation is a qualitative study of racially ambiguous people and their life experiences. Racially ambiguous people are individuals who are frequently misidentified racially by others because they do not resemble the phenotype associated with the racial group to which they belong or because they belong to racial/ethnic groups originating in different parts of the world that resemble each other. The racial/ethnic population of the United States is constantly changing because of variations in the birth rates among the racial/ethnic groups that comprise those populations and immigration from around the world. Although much research has been done that documents the existence of racial/ethnic mixing in the history of the United States and the world, this multiracial history is seldom acknowledged in the social, work, and other spheres of interaction among people in the U.S., instead a racialized system based on the perception of individuals as mono-racial thus easily identified through (skin tone, hair texture, facial features, etc.). This is research was done using life experience interviews with 24 racially ambiguous individuals to determine how race/ethnicity has affected their lives and how they negotiate the minefield of race. Copyright 2012 by Starita Smith ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank the 24 people who allowed me to interview them. They shared with me their stories of overcoming challenges, of being hurt by others, of triumphing over adversity, of finding themselves and of coming to a strong, healthy racial identity under often difficult circumstances. They spurred me on to do this research because they believe that race is still too much of a painful and divisive issue in the U.S. to pretend as if it is not important. I wish to express my deepest appreciation to my committee chair Dr. George Yancey for his mentoring, his advising, his challenging me to think deeper, and his encouraging me through tough times. I thank Dr. Erma Lawson, Dr. Ami Moore, and Dr. AnaLouise Keating for their patience and hard work on my committee. I am especially grateful to Dr. Keating for encouraging me to study about transgressive identities and race. I thank Dr. Cynthia Cready for her help on my committee early on. I am most deeply appreciative of my strong, supportive and understanding sons Emory and Evan and my daughter-in-law Stephanie for your love and patience through this long process. I remember with much love and gratitude the lessons of my late mother Velma Carter Smith. I also thank my sisters Rhonda Liggians and Lyrica Smith, my brothers Victor and Karl Smith and my stepmother Victoria Smith, as well as my cousins Cecilia and Tzena Smith, Donna Carter, Leslie Edwards, Diana Henry and their families. I am grateful to my ex-office mate and good friend Qi Sun, as well as Johnnie Dollarhide, Elizabeth Keith, Gary Reese, Donald Cox, Yawo Bessa, Linnea Lose, Inshirah Nabhan, Fariba Mirhaba, Myron Strong, Lindsey Johnson and Rodney Bales for their unstinting encouragement. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES............................................................................................. VI CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 Research Questions ............................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ......................................................................... 4 Changing Definitions of Race ............................................................................................. 4 Race under European Domination ...................................................................................... 7 The One-Drop Rule or Hypo-Descent ................................................................................ 8 Color Stratification among Blacks ...................................................................................... 9 Passing as White ............................................................................................................... 10 Challenge to the One-Drop Rule....................................................................................... 12 Biracial Identity ................................................................................................................ 13 Racial Classifications have Porous Borders ..................................................................... 14 Race as a Sorting Mechanism ........................................................................................... 15 Tri-Racial Isolate Groups .................................................................................................. 17 The Case of the Mississippi Choctaw Rejected ................................................................ 18 Racial Misclassification and Native Americans ............................................................... 19 Mixed Race Individuals and Kinship Networks ............................................................... 21 Racial Fusion and the Hispanics ....................................................................................... 24 The U.S. Census and the Social Construction of Race ..................................................... 26 CHAPTER 3 THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES........................................................................ 28 Racial Formation Theory .................................................................................................. 28 Assimilation Theory.......................................................................................................... 31 The Latin Americanization Thesis .................................................................................... 32 Theoretical Perspectives: Discussion ................................................................................ 37 CHAPTER 4 METHODS ............................................................................................................. 45 Recruitment ....................................................................................................................... 45 Data-Gathering Instruments .............................................................................................. 47 iv Interview Locations .......................................................................................................... 48 The Interviewees ............................................................................................................... 48 The Interview Script ......................................................................................................... 49 Reflexivity......................................................................................................................... 52 CHAPTER 5 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RACE ENDURES IN A “COLORBLIND SOCIETY” ....................................................................................................................................................... 56 Race in Work and School ................................................................................................. 58 Family life ......................................................................................................................... 62 Romantic and Spousal Relationships ................................................................................ 66 CHAPTER 6 CONSTANT OBJECTIFICATION ...................................................................... 71 Objectification of Native Americans ................................................................................ 75 Being Constantly Doubted ................................................................................................ 79 CHAPTER 7 STUBBORN STEREOTYPES .............................................................................. 83 CHAPTER 8 DEVELOPING AN ADULT CORE RACIAL IDENTITY ................................. 93 “We’re All the Same in God’s Eyes, Then How Come I Don’t Look Like You?” .......... 94 Black is Bad ...................................................................................................................... 97 Making up Your own Racial Identity ............................................................................... 98 CHAPTER 9 NAVIGATING THE RACIAL LANDSCAPE: THE MULTIFOCAL RACIAL IDENTITY .................................................................................................................................. 100 Pride in Minority Identity ............................................................................................... 101 Learning to be Resilient .................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Critique of Puerto Rican Race Relations in Mayra Santos-Febres’ Sobre Piel Y Papel
    Cuaderno Internacional de Estudios Humanísticos y Literatura: CIEHL International Journal of Humanistics Studies and Literature | 55 Uneasy Talk about Race: Critique of Puerto Rican Race Relations in Mayra Santos-Febres’ Sobre piel y papel Diana Gumbar Georgetown University A talk about race and one’s color is always complicated in Puerto Rico. In the collection of essays Sobre piel y papel (2005), Mayra Santos-Febres, a well-known contemporary Puerto Rican writer and public intellectual,1 reflects on this unease: “Sé muy bien que nombrar colores de piel es asunto escabroso en nuestro país. Nombrar al negro o a la negra, al mulato, a la grifa, al jabao. […] Esto de hablar de lo negro resulta difícil empresa. Y por ello necesario” (63). She poses to ask why by naming race we nearly trespass what is socially acceptable. Her response is immediate: “‘Racismo,’ contestarían algunos sin pensarlo dos veces. Y tienen razón. Sin embargo, mientras más lo pienso, más me convenzo de que esta contestación oculta más de lo que revela” (Santos-Febres, Sobre 64). The writer argues that tact required for treating race and color speaks of complex social phenomena that signify the burden of living mestizaje. She adds that social consent of avoiding discussing race on the public arena promotes inherent racism, making Afro-Puerto Ricans the most disadvantaged group (Sobre 73, 160). Addressing the linguistic unease of mentioning race, Santos-Febres uncovers social and political ramifications of the difficulty of talking about color and race in Puerto Rico. This essay will present that calling for public articulation of blackness, the author proposes a program of writing the African heritage into modern national history, deconstructing racial construction as natural, and thinking about the black identity beyond essentialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes Toward English Language Legislation: Predictors and Rationales
    Intercultural Communication Studies XI: 4 2002 Schatz, Sullivan, Flanigan and Black Attitudes toward English Language Legislation: Predictors and Rationales Robert T. Schatz Nancy Sullivan Metropolitan State College Texas A&M University- of Denver Corpus Christi Beverly Flanigan Autumn Black Ohio University Metropolitan State College of Denver Abstract The research investigated predictors of and reasons for people’s attitudes toward English Language Legislation (ELL) in the United States. Survey responses of 660 participants from South Texas, Colorado, and Ohio were examined. Regression analysis of demographic/background factors indicated that Hispanic ethnicity, Spanish-English bilingual language background, and political conservatism were independent predictors of ELL support. The relationship between strength of ethnic identification and ELL attitudes was mediated by respondents’ ethnicity: Increased ethnic identification was associated with support for ELL among European-Americans but with opposition to ELL among Hispanic-Americans. National (U.S.) attachment, most notably concern for the U.S. flag, also predicted pro-ELL attitudes. Further, in support of the “backlash hypothesis,” higher levels of ELL support among European-Americans were found in the region with the highest proportion of Hispanic residents (South Texas) than in the region with the lowest (Ohio). Pro- and anti-ELL respondents’ importance ratings of reasons for their position roughly paralleled the findings of previous research by Sullivan and Schatz (1999). In addition, ethnic differences in these ratings were more pronounced among ELL opponents than among ELL proponents. These findings are discussed within the context of the predictors and underlying motivations of people’s attitudes toward ELL. 121 Intercultural Communication Studies XI: 4 2002 Schatz, Sullivan, Flanigan and Black The status of English in the United States has been debated for over a century.
    [Show full text]
  • American Jewish Yearbook
    JEWISH STATISTICS 277 JEWISH STATISTICS The statistics of Jews in the world rest largely upon estimates. In Russia, Austria-Hungary, Germany, and a few other countries, official figures are obtainable. In the main, however, the num- bers given are based upon estimates repeated and added to by one statistical authority after another. For the statistics given below various authorities have been consulted, among them the " Statesman's Year Book" for 1910, the English " Jewish Year Book " for 5670-71, " The Jewish Ency- clopedia," Jildische Statistik, and the Alliance Israelite Uni- verselle reports. THE UNITED STATES ESTIMATES As the census of the United States has, in accordance with the spirit of American institutions, taken no heed of the religious convictions of American citizens, whether native-born or natural- ized, all statements concerning the number of Jews living in this country are based upon estimates. The Jewish population was estimated— In 1818 by Mordecai M. Noah at 3,000 In 1824 by Solomon Etting at 6,000 In 1826 by Isaac C. Harby at 6,000 In 1840 by the American Almanac at 15,000 In 1848 by M. A. Berk at 50,000 In 1880 by Wm. B. Hackenburg at 230,257 In 1888 by Isaac Markens at 400,000 In 1897 by David Sulzberger at 937,800 In 1905 by "The Jewish Encyclopedia" at 1,508,435 In 1907 by " The American Jewish Year Book " at 1,777,185 In 1910 by " The American Je\rish Year Book" at 2,044,762 DISTRIBUTION The following table by States presents two sets of estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • AAPI Community Data Needed to Assess Better Health Outcomes
    CENTER FOR HEALTH EQUITY REPORT AAPI community data needed to assess better health outcomes EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report lays out an historical overview of the politicizing of the AAPI community for the purpose of distributing federal resources based on need as determined by federal data collection efforts. This report also outlines what current federal, state, local, as well as private and non-government associated data efforts entail, and the limitations associated with current efforts. Finally, this report re-emphasizes the need for continued surveillance of data collection initiatives, and greater granularity of data collection, pertaining to AAPI communities in the U.S. and its territories. and greater granularity of data collection, pertaining to AAPI communities in the U.S. and its territories. BACKGROUND At the height of the Vietnam War in 1968, a young Japanese graduate student at the University of California at Berkeley, Yuji Ichioka, banded with other students in an attempt to shut down the university in collective protest against the conflict. The demonstration was not only successful for five months, but Ichioka and his student colleagues also successfully initiated a self-determination campaign against the derogatory term, “Oriental,” then reserved for all persons of Asian descent, birthing the distinction, “Asian American,”1 which we use to this day. The United States Census Bureau’s “Asian” racial category refers to “a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent...,” while “Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander” refers to “a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.2” Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPI) collectively comprise the largest and fastest growing racial group in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodoxy in American Jewish Life1
    ORTHODOXY IN AMERICAN JEWISH LIFE1 by CHARLES S. LIEBMAN INTRODUCTION • DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ORTHODOXY • EARLY ORTHODOX COMMUNITY • UNCOMMITTED ORTHODOX • COM- MITTED ORTHODOX • MODERN ORTHODOX • SECTARIANS • LEAD- ERSHIP • DIRECTIONS AND TENDENCIES • APPENDLX: YESHIVOT PROVIDING INTENSIVE TALMUDIC STUDY A HIS ESSAY is an effort to describe the communal aspects and institutional forms of Orthodox Judaism in the United States. For the most part, it ignores the doctrines, faith, and practices of Orthodox Jews, and barely touches upon synagogue hie, which is the most meaningful expression of American Orthodoxy. It is hoped that the reader will find here some appreciation of the vitality of American Orthodoxy. Earlier predictions of the demise of 11 am indebted to many people who assisted me in making this essay possible. More than 40, active in a variety of Orthodox organizations, gave freely of their time for extended discussions and interviews and many lay leaders and rabbis throughout the United States responded to a mail questionnaire. A number of people read a draft of this paper. I would be remiss if I did not mention a few by name, at the same time exonerating them of any responsibility for errors of fact or for my own judgments and interpretations. The section on modern Orthodoxy was read by Rabbi Emanuel Rackman. The sections beginning with the sectarian Orthodox to the conclusion of the paper were read by Rabbi Nathan Bulman. Criticism and comments on the entire paper were forthcoming from Rabbi Aaron Lichtenstein, Dr. Marshall Ski are, and Victor Geller, without whose assistance the section on the number of Orthodox Jews could not have been written.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Intersectional Comparative Analysis to the Post- Racial Future of Critical Race Theory: a Brazil-U.S
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Connecticut Law Review School of Law 2011 The Value of Intersectional Comparative Analysis to the Post- Racial Future of Critical Race Theory: A Brazil-U.S. Comparative Case Study Commentary: Critical Race Theory: A Commemoration: Response Tanya Kateri Hernandez Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review Recommended Citation Hernandez, Tanya Kateri, "The Value of Intersectional Comparative Analysis to the Post-Racial Future of Critical Race Theory: A Brazil-U.S. Comparative Case Study Commentary: Critical Race Theory: A Commemoration: Response" (2011). Connecticut Law Review. 120. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review/120 CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 43 JULY 2011 NUMBER5 Article The Value of Intersectional Comparative Analysis to the "Post-Racial" Future of Critical Race Theory: A Brazil-U.S. Comparative Case Study TANYA KATERi HERNANDEZ This Commentary Article aims to illustrate the value of comparative law to the jurisprudence of Critical Race Theory (CRT), particularly with reference to the CRT project of deconstructing the mystique of "post- racialism." The central thesis of the Article is that the dangerous seductions of a U.S. ideology of "post-racialism" are more clearly identified when subject to the comparative law lens. In particular, a comparison to the Brazilian racial democracy version of "post-racialism" is an instructive platform from which to assess the advisability of promoting post-racial analyses of U.S. racial inequality. In Part I the Article introduces the value of comparative law to the future development of CRT Part II provides an overview ofBrazilian "post-racial"discourse. Part III then details the quantitative and qualitative indicators of racial discriminationand intersectionalrace andgender discrimination in Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Ganesh Sitaraman's Idealized American History
    GANESH SITARAMAN’S IDEALIZED AMERICAN HISTORY DAVID LYONS A popular theme among patriots is to celebrate America’s special virtues, which distinguish it radically from European models. Ganesh Sitaraman tells us that political constitutions have generally been designed to prevent socially destabilizing class warfare between the rich, who seek greater domination, and the poor, who would like to redistribute the former’s wealth. America’s Constitution is distinctive because it was consciously designed for a society in which the middle class is large enough to preserve social stability. That is why Sitaraman calls it a “middle-class constitution.” Sitaraman credits the Founders with understanding that America was capable of avoiding class warfare and its consequences. They understood that the young nation was blessed with “economic equality,” which for present purposes means a middle class large and strong enough to maintain a balance of political power. America’s Constitution was designed to exploit and preserve that equilibrium. But the Founders did not anticipate developments that would challenge the viability of their design, not least the displacement of independent farmers (who are counted here as “middle class”) by low-wage factory workers and their affluent employers. Today, as has happened in past eras, America’s political system faces a compound crisis: America’s increasingly concentrated wealth distorts its electoral system, and its greatly intensified inequality prevents the shrinking middle class from performing its constitutional function. America, accordingly, faces the prospect of open class warfare, from which will emerge an oppressive oligarchy comprising the wealthy elite, perhaps followed by a bloody revolt by the poor.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Mixed-Race Women in the United States During the Early Twentieth Century
    Of Double-Blooded Birth: A History of Mixed-Race Women in the United States during the Early Twentieth Century Jemma Grace Carter Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in American Studies at the University of East Anglia, School of Arts, Media, and American Studies January 2020 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived therefrom must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. Abstract Often homogenised into broader narratives of African-American history, the historical experience of mixed-race women of black-white descent forms the central research focus of this thesis. Examining the lives of such women offers a valuable insight into how notions of race, class, gender and physical aesthetics were understood, articulated and negotiated throughout the United States during the early-twentieth century. Through an analysis of wide-ranging primary source material, from letters, diaries and autobiographies to advertisements, artwork and unpublished poetry, this thesis provides an interdisciplinary contribution to the field of Critical Mixed Race Studies, and African- American history. It builds on existing interpretations of the Harlem Renaissance by considering the significance of mixed-racial heritage on the formation of literature produced by key individuals over the period. Moreover, this research reveals that many of the visual and literary sources typically studied in isolation in fact informed one another, and had a profound impact on how factors such as beauty, citizenship, and respectability intersected, and specifically influenced the lives of mixed-race women.
    [Show full text]
  • EDRS PUCE BF-80.83 Plus Postage
    DOCUMENT ISSUES 1 ED 130 783 PS 008 917 TITLE Parenting in 1976s A Listing from PHIC. INSTITUTION Southwest Educational Development Tab.-, Austin, Tex., SPONS AGENCY National Inst. of Education (HEW), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Bay 76 NOTE 169p.; For 1975 edition, see ED 110 156. AVAILABLE FROMParenting Baterials Inforaation Center, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, 211 East 7th 'Street, Austin, Texas 78701 ($5.00) EDRS PUCE BF-80.83 Plus Postage. BC Not Available froa EDRS. DESCIIPTORS *Bibliographies; Child Abuse; Child Development; Cultural Pluralisa; Discipline4 *Early Childhood Education; Exceptional Children; F4mily (Sociological Unit); Group Relations; Health; Learning Activities; *Parent Education; Parent Participation; *Parents; Parent Teacher Cooperation; Peer Relationship; Prograa Descriptions; *Resource Materials IDENTIFIERS *Parenting Materials Information Center TX ABSTRACT This bibliography lists iaterials, programs and resources which appear to be relevant to the lauds of parents and." those-working with parents.,The bibliography is a project of the Parenting Baterials Information Center (PEIC) being deyeloped by the Southvest Educational Developaent Laboratory.,PEIC colledts, analyzes and disseminates information pertaining to parenting..The list is divided into major content areas according to iaitial classification efforts by the center staff.,These major areas have been designated (1) academic contents and skills; (2) child abuse; (3) discipline;. (4) early childhood activities; (S) education; (6) exceptional children; (7) family; (8) general resources for parenting/family/education; (9) group relationships and training; (10) health and safety; (11) large scale programs; (12) multi-ethnic aulti-cultural heritage and contents; (13) language and intellectual developaent; (14) parent, school and community involveaent; (15) parenting; (16) physical and sensory deprivation;(17).
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE the Arab Spring Abroad
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE The Arab Spring Abroad: Mobilization among Syrian, Libyan, and Yemeni Diasporas in the U.S. and Great Britain DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Sociology by Dana M. Moss Dissertation Committee: Distinguished Professor David A. Snow, Chair Chancellor’s Professor Charles Ragin Professor Judith Stepan-Norris Professor David S. Meyer Associate Professor Yang Su 2016 © 2016 Dana M. Moss DEDICATION To my husband William Picard, an exceptional partner and a true activist; and to my wonderfully supportive and loving parents, Nancy Watts and John Moss. Thank you for everything, always. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ACRONYMS iv LIST OF FIGURES v LIST OF TABLES vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii CURRICULUM VITAE viii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION xiv INTRODUCTION 1 PART I: THE DYNAMICS OF DIASPORA MOVEMENT EMERGENCE CHAPTER 1: Diaspora Activism before the Arab Spring 30 CHAPTER 2: The Resurgence and Emergence of Transnational Diaspora Mobilization during the Arab Spring 70 PART II: THE ROLES OF THE DIASPORAS IN THE REVOLUTIONS 126 CHAPTER 3: The Libyan Case 132 CHAPTER 4: The Syrian Case 169 CHAPTER 5: The Yemeni Case 219 PART III: SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF THE ARAB SPRING CHAPTER 6: The Effects of Episodic Transnational Mobilization on Diaspora Politics 247 CHAPTER 7: Conclusion and Implications 270 REFERENCES 283 ENDNOTES 292 iii LIST OF ACRONYMS FSA Free Syria Army ISIS The Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham, or Daesh NFSL National Front for the Salvation
    [Show full text]
  • American Ethnicity and Czech Immigrants' Integration in Texas: Cemetery Data
    AMERICAN ETHNICITY AND CZECH IMMIGRANTS’ INTEGRATION IN TEXAS: CEMETERY DATA EVA ECKERT Anglo-American University, Prague The lasting traces of Czech immigration to Texas and the once prominent immigrant community lead to the cemeteries. The purpose of this study is to show how to read Czech cemetery data in Texas from the 1860s to the 1950s in order to understand the immigrants’ integration and contact with their German neighbors and the dominant Anglo-American society. To immigrants in the middle of the 19th century, Texas offered land and freedom of movement. But the reasons to return home outweighed those to stay for some of the earliest immigrants who were unable to align themselves with networks established by the German immigrants who preceded them. Those who followed the pioneers lived within interethnic social structures that they gradually abandoned in favor of the ethnocentric Czech community. Language choices, the interplay of Czech and English, and the endurance of the Czech language in tombstone inscriptions yield synchronic and diachronic data whose analysis and interpretation reveal sociolinguistic networks of immigrants, rules of social cohesion and ethnic identity. Keywords: Texas Czech cemeteries, immigrant integration, language shift, interethnic networks, ethnocentric Czech community INTRODUCTION Cemetery lands are overlaid with language that is opened to diachronic and synchronic exploration. Chronological data of gravestones resonate with immigrant arrivals. Cemetery inscriptions thus provide a permanent, yet rarely
    [Show full text]
  • If You Are Going to Say You're Afro-Latina That Means That You Are Black
    “If you are going to say you’re Afro-Latina that means that you are Black”: Afro-Latinxs Contesting the Dilution of Afro-Latinidad Rene Ayala Mellon Mays Undergraduate Fellowship Final Research Paper 15 May 2019 Ayala 1 The second half of the 2010’s has brought an increase in the visibility of, and conversations about, Afro-Latinx identity in the United States. Afro-Latinx, in its simplest definition, is a term that describes Latin Americans and Latin American Descendants who are of African Descent. While Afro-Latinidad as a concept and an identity has existed for decades, both in Latin America and the United States, the current decade has brought many advances in terms of the visibility of Afro-Latinidad and Afro-Latinx people in the United States. Univision, one of the five main Spanish language news channels targeted towards Latinxs living the United States, in late 2017 promoted Ilda Calderon, an Afro-Colombian news anchor, to main news anchor on their prime-time news program Noticiero Univsion (Hansen 2017). This promotion makes her the first Afro-Latina to anchor the news in Univsion’s history as well as the first Afro-Latina to anchor in any major network in the U.S. The decision comes at the heel of the networks airing of Calderon’s interview with a Ku Klux’s Klan Leader in August of 2017 (Univision 2017). The interview was particularly interesting because it showed the complexities of Afro-Latinidad to their Latinx audience. The network has historically been criticized for their exclusion and erasure of Afro-Latinxs in both their coverage of news that occurs in Latin America and the U.S.
    [Show full text]