Durban Hub Port, Road-To-Rail and Port of Ngqura Developments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Durban Hub Port, Road-To-Rail and Port of Ngqura Developments DURBAN HUB PORT, ROAD-TO-RAIL AND PORT OF NGQURA DEVELOPMENTS PRESENTATION TO: SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC ENTERPRISES AND COMMUNICATION PREPARED BY: TRANSNET SOC LTD 1 DATE: 2 JUNE 2021 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL CONTENTS A. DURBAN HUB PORT DEVELOPMENT - PoD STRATEGIC INITATIVES - CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES WITH PoD LAYOUT - PoD END STATE B. TRANSNET FREIGHT RAIL INITIATIVES - DESIRED END STATE – RAIL NETWORK - ENABLING BACK OF PORT FACILILITIES C. PORT OF NGQURA DEVELOPMENT - MIGRATION OF PE BULK ORE TERMINAL - LIQUID BULK TERMINAL - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS & LONG-TERM COMBINED PROPOSAL D. TRANSNET FREIGHT RAIL: CAPECOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT AND INITATIVES E. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL A. DURBAN HUB PORT DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL A. TRANSNET'S HUB PORT STRATEGY Rev 1 Global shipping alliances have in recent times consolidated power and control over maritime container trade, with economies of scale leading to larger vessels and shipping route control leading to fewer direct port to port connections. Transnet’s Hub Port strategy aims to reduce the cost of intercontinental shipping by 20-30% through partnerships with industry players to further integrate South African ports into their vessel calling patterns, in addition to creating an integrated hub-port system that increases attractiveness and capacity (vessel size and a TEU handling), starting with NCT as a transshipment hub at supporting South Africa – China trade. NCT will work in unison with the significant expansion to take place at the Port of Durban, and will augment expansion plans at the Port of Cape Town. Above: Global hub-ports attract larger volumes of trade as the unit cost of moving a container decreases. This is a key driver for unlocking the potential of the African Continental Free Trade Area, and to boost trade volumes for the broader Southern African Development Below: Analysis of South Africa’s top 10 trading partners Community region. has shown China moving to top position since 2010 Left: World container maritime trade is dominated by a just a few hub ports, predominantly in east-west Transnet Port Strategy Transnet Hub trade routes. Segment Strategy Key Focus Area:Focus Key StrategySegment This is changing as volumes develop in the south. 4 Source: Jean Paul Rodrigue (Hofstra Univ ersity ) Source: World SourcesBank : Transnet Strategy and Planning, 2021 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL A. EVOLUTION OF CONTAINER VESSELS 18,000 TEU vessels are already on the water More than 70% of all container ships on order in the global market are >8,000 TEU capacity Latest Generation 15m+ (Indicative size) Port of Durban - currently Port of Durban - currently • Modern, deep water • Handles these vessels • Special handling conditions facilities are required to routinely routinely handle these vessels Port of Durban – with deepened berths • Accommodating larger vessels will change shipping patterns to make Durban and South Africa (SA) more attractive as a trade destination and will reduce the unit cost of exporting SA containers by an 5 estimated 30%. Source: Slack, Rodrigue & Comtois, 2006; Transnet Strategy and Planning, 2021 Source: PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL A. TRANSNET’S 2020’S RENEWAL PROGRAMME: PoD Positioning the PoD – A Regional Context Creating a hub-status port has the opportunity to substantially increase the handling of transshipment volumes destined for ports in the broader SADC region • What are Transnet’s aspirations for a hub port? • What scale is under consideration? • Eastern Region, SA or SADC? Potential demand scenarios for existing strategy, South African and SADC hubs. vessels 16mil SADC HUB TEU SA HUB Existing Strategy 8mil TEU 2010 2020 2030 2040 6 Source: Transnet Strategy and Planning, 2021 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL A. KEY INITIATIVES AS PART OF THE REGIONAL STRATEGIC HUB Positioning of the PoD Containers: The Port of Durban already handles 60% of trade to and from South Improving Connectivity to Africa and through positioning it to handle larger ships (15,000 TEU sized the Port of Durban vessels) at substantially better performance than at present, it can be re- Reposition the NATCOR Rail Container positioned to serve the dominant southern-hemisphere shipping lanes. The Business through structural changes to create real benefit to South Africa is that the unit cost of inter-continental a partnership model for rail container logistics Container shipping will reduce over time (by as much as 20% to 30%). Disposal of the auto wagons fleet to Johannesburg customers and logistics service providers, Improving the rail logistics solution on the Durban to Gauteng corridor Auto creating a hook-and-haul service by Transnet (NatCor) is critical to supporting the major developments planned for the Port of Durban. Creating a competitive alternative to the dominant road Strategic Narrative Strategic supply chain is imperative. Transnet will implement structural changes to create a mixed-equity model of ownership and operation of the elements of the rail-based container supply chain. Automotive: Durban Developing Capacity at Transnet intends to leverage private sector capital and capabilities to revitalise port and rail logistics solutions for the sector through strategic the Port of Durban investment in back-of-port (BOP) capacity at various locations, including Reposition Port of Durban as Strategic Strategic Narrative almost doubling the auto capacity at the Port of Durban. International Container Hub as detailed in the Port of Durban Master Plan Container Liquid Fuel: Develop a Durban Fuel Import Fuel and Accumulation Facility Transnet will focus on asset utilisation while leveraging private Liquid Ngqura partnerships to grow import capacity for refined fuels andCape increase Town market Partner to expand auto export capacity at access for new entrants. Auto the Port of Durban Key to this is the revitalisation of underutilised assets to create the Transnet7 Fuel Import Terminal in the Port of Durban, feeding into the New Map v3 Strategic Strategic Narrative Multi Product Pipeline to transport refined fuel products inland. Source: Transnet Strategy and Planning, 2021 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL A. TRANSNET’S 2020’S RENEWAL PROGRAMME: PoD PoD Desired End State (2032) 880k units 1.7mTEUs 2.9mTEUs 2.0mTEUs 4.7mTEUs 8 Source: Transnet National Ports Authority, 2021 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL A. TRANSNET’S 2020’S RENEWAL PROGRAMME: PoD Point Precinct: Increased Capacity from 0.2m TEUs to 1.7m TEUs Key Insights No. Activity ▪ Conversion of car and multi-purpose terminal 1 to container terminal capacity ▪ Conversion of Office space, break bulk and 2 cruise terminal to auto capacity Point & Recreational Precinct Current Layout ▪ Automotive Capacity to be increased from 520k Units to 880k Units 2 3 ▪ Cruise Terminal Development integrating with 5 the Waterfront Development ▪ Waterfront Development by the Municipality 4 1 4 3 ▪ Yacht Basin Development by the Municipality 5 Point & Recreational Precinct Future Layout 9 Source: Transnet National Ports Authority, 2021 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL A. TRANSNET’S 2020’S RENEWAL PROGRAMME: PoD MW Precinct: Development of 2m TEUs Capacity Key Insights No. Activity 1 ▪ Conversion of general cargo to container terminal capacity Maydon Wharf Precinct Current Layout ▪ Deproclaimation of MW roads for improved 2 traffic management, efficiencies and security systems 2 3 3 ▪ Maydon Wharf Channel Widening and Deepening 1 Maydon Wharf Precinct Future Layout 10 Source: Transnet National Ports Authority, 2021 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL A. TRANSNET’S 2020’S RENEWAL PROGRAMME: PoD Container Precinct: Increased Capacity from 2.7m TEUs to 7.6m TEUs Key Insights No. Activity 1 ▪ Berth Deepening to increase container capacity by 900,000 TEUs ▪ New deep-water berths with chart datum depth ranging from 16.5 m to 18m Durban Container Terminal Current Layout 2 ▪ Conversion of Container Depot to terminal 1 3 operations to augment water side capacity 2 3 ▪ Infill of Pier 2 and Pier 1 to increase container capacity by 4 million TEUs ▪ New deep-water berths with chart datum depth ranging from 16.5 m to 18m Durban Container Terminal Future Layout 11 NOTE: Chart datum, refers to the water level that depths displayed on a nautical chart and measured from. Source: Transnet National Ports Authority, 2021 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL A. TRANSNET’S 2020’S RENEWAL PROGRAMME: PoD Island View Precinct: Dig-Out 2 Proposed Phasing 1 No. Activity Dry Bulk Terminal relocated to Richards Bay 3 1 Navy relocated to Bluff Area RB 2 3 Portion of Liquid Bulk Chemicals relocated to Island View Precinct Current Layout Richards Bay Future Use ▪ Petroleum Multiple Line Access (MLA) and flexible hoses on all berths ▪ Proposed LPG MLA on Island View (IV) 7 ▪ Proposed Renewables/Bio-fuels MLA on IV2 and IV3 ▪ 6 mixed-use berths for greater flexibility ▪ 1 dedicated bunkering berth 12 Island View Precinct Future Layout Source: Transnet National Ports Authority, 2021 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL A. DURBAN HUB PORT DEVELOPMENT Consulted Stakeholders Industry Bodies Government Statutory Bodies Regulators Affected • Durban Chamber of • Local Municipalities • Ports • Ports Regulator Stakeholders Commerce • Provincial Consultative South Africa (PRSA) • SA Navy • CLOF/ SASSOA/ Government Committee PoD • SA National Defense SAPIA (Premier, MEC and Richards • National Energy Force • Harbour Carriers EDTEA, Economic Bay Regulator of South • Transnet Port Africa (NERSA) Association Cluster) Terminals (TPT) • SAAFF • National Government • FPT • Maritime Clusters (DOT
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 3: Description of the Affected Environment
    Proposed extension to the container berth and construction of an administration craft basin at the Port of Ngqura Chapter 3 : Description of the Affected Environment Chapter 3: Description of the Affected Environment Final Scoping Report – CSIR, April 2007 Page i Proposed extension to the container berth and construction of an administration craft basin at the Port of Ngqura Chapter 3 : Description of the Affected Environment Description of the Affected Environment 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT________ 3-1 3.1 Introduction _________________________________________________________3-1 3.2 Site location_________________________________________________________3-1 3.3 Biophysical environment _______________________________________________3-2 3.3.1 Climate ____________________________________________________________ 3-2 3.3.2 Terrestrial features: landscape and geology ________________________________ 3-2 3.3.3 Vegetation __________________________________________________________ 3-3 3.3.4 Birds ______________________________________________________________ 3-3 3.3.5 Marine ecosystems ___________________________________________________ 3-3 3.4 Socio-economic environment ___________________________________________3-4 3.4.1 Demographics and human development___________________________________ 3-4 3.4.2 In-migration _________________________________________________________ 3-4 3.4.3 Initiatives to promote economic development _______________________________ 3-5 Final Scoping Report – CSIR, April 2007 Page ii Proposed extension to the
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Cape Heritage
    EASTERN CAPE HERITAGE mirrored in its port terminals EAST LONDON In 1836 a surfboat service was provided for the will contain a total of 32 berths stretching further In 1825 the mouth of the Kowie River in Port handling of cargo and passengers, with the fi rst up the Coega River valley and along the south- Alfred was identifi ed as a site for a port and jetty constructed in 1837. western coast. terminal. This was abandoned after the river By 1877 Port Elizabeth had become the busiest Work has started on new fuel and manganese mouth was found to be too shallow and liable South African port. terminals to replace those in the port of to silting. However, the Charl Malan Quay (present container Port Elizabeth. Construction on the main harbour began in terminal) was only built in 1933, by which time Ngqura is the main transhipment hub for the 1872, and in 1873 work began on the breakwater. Cape Town and Durban had taken much of the South African port system. The original name was Port Rex. traffi c away due to their superior facilities In 2012/2013 Ngqura was the fastest-growing The unusual double-decker bridge (road over rail) NGQURA container terminal in the world, according to Drewry Consultants. Steve Biko bridge spanning the Buffalo River was The construction of the port was authorised by completed in 1935 and to this day, is the only the South African parliament in 2002. bridge of its type in South Africa. It is the eighth port to be operated by Transnet Built in the 1970s, the grain elevator on the Port Terminals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phase 1 Archaeological Heritage Impact Assessment
    A PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE GREATER COEGA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONE (IDZ), NEAR PORT ELIZABETH, NELSON MANDELA BAY MUNICIPALITY, EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE Prepared for: Coega Industrial Development Corporation (Pty) Ltd Contact person: Ms A.von Holdt Private Bag X6009 Port Elizabeth 6000 Tel: 041 4030400 Fax: 041 4030401 Cell: 0826574648 email: [email protected] Compiled by: Dr Johan Binneman On behalf of: Eastern Cape Heritage Consultants P.O. Box 689 Jeffreys Bay 6330 Tel: 042 962096 Cell: 0728006322 email: [email protected] Date: May 2010 CONTENTS SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT INFORMATION .................................................................................................... 2 BRIEF ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND OF THE COEGA REGION....................... 3 CULTURAL SENSITIVITY OF THE COEGA REGION ………………………………….. 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY .................................................................................... 9 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION.............................................................................. 9 Zone 1 ………………………………………………………………………………. 11 Zone 2 ………………………………………………………………………………. 13 Zone 3 ………………………………………………………………………………. 15 Zone 4 ………………………………………………………………………………. 15 Zone 6 ………………………………………………………………………………. 17 Zone 7 ………………………………………………………………………………. 19 Zone 9 ………………………………………………………………………………. 21 Zone 10 …………………………………………………………………………..…. 23 Zone 11 ………………………………………………..…………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Archaeological Impact Assessment of Proposed Aquaculture Areas 1, 6 and 7, Algoa Bay, Eastern Cape Province
    MARITIME ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED AQUACULTURE AREAS 1, 6 AND 7, ALGOA BAY, EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE Assessment conducted under Section 38 (8) of the National Heritage Resources Act (No. 25 of 1999) as part of a Basic Assessment Prepared for Anchor Research & Monitoring (Pty) Ltd On behalf of Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries February 2019 Prepared by John Gribble ACO Associates cc Physical: Unit D17, Prime Park, 21 Mocke Rd, Diep River Postal: 8 Jacobs Ladder St James, 7945 [email protected] Tel: 021 7064104 Cell: 078 616 2961 Fax to e-mail: 086 603 7195 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ACO Associates cc has been requested by Anchor Research & Monitoring (Pty) Ltd on behalf of Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries to undertake a desktop maritime archaeological impact assessment of three areas within Algoa Bay under consideration as aquaculture areas, namely Algoa 1, 6 and 7. This maritime heritage assessment report, supported by recommendations for implementable mitigation measures will form part of a Basic Assessment for the proposed development of aquaculture in Algoa Bay. Findings: In respect of submerged prehistoric archaeological potential, this assessment indicates that although there have, to date, been no specific studies of the submerged prehistory of Algoa Bay, the archaeological evidence for a hominin presence in the Algoa Bay region in the Earlier, Middle and Later Stone Age is plentiful. At various times in the last 900,000 global glacial cycles have caused substantial drops in sea level and the current seabed of Algoa Bay would have been exposed as a terrestrial landscape. Ancient river courses, whose channels are today buried under modern seabed sediment, would have been an important focus for hominin activity on the exposed continental shelf in the past and there is the potential for the occurrence of ancient, submerged archaeological material in association with palaeo- river channels.
    [Show full text]
  • Ltpf 2016 193
    1. INTRODUCTION ___________________________________________________________________________________ 197 1.1 PORT PLANNING PRINCIPLES .................................................................................................................................................... 198 1.2 MARITIME ECONOMIC REVIEW ................................................................................................................................................ 198 1.3 KEY PORT PLANNING TRENDS AND ISSUES .................................................................................................................................. 200 2. SOUTH AFRICA’S PORT SYSTEM ______________________________________________________________________ 201 2.1 PORTS OF SOUTH AFRICA ........................................................................................................................................................ 201 2.2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE PORTS SYSTEM ....................................................................................................................................... 202 2.3 POTENTIAL PORT SITES ........................................................................................................................................................... 202 2.4 PORT’S RAIL AND ROAD INTEGRATION ....................................................................................................................................... 204 2.5 TRANSNET PLANNING ALIGNMENT AND REFLECTION OF KEY GOVERNMENT STRATEGIES ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Port Sector Review 2015
    PORTS SECTOR REVIEW 2015/16 PUBLIC CONSULTATION ROADSHOW DISCUSSION DOCUMENT Comment is invited via written submission by: 30 June 2016, addressed to: The Chairperson, Ports Regulator, Private Bag X54322, Durban, 4000 Or email submissions to: [email protected]. 1 Contents Introduction: ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Volumes and capacity utilisation: An overview by cargo type ...................................................... 11 Container Volumes; the largest revenue generator for the Port system .................................... 11 The automotive trade; a cornerstone of the South African economy .................................. 17 Dry Bulk Remains of Strategic Importance to the South African Economy ........................... 23 Break Bulk/Multi-Purpose Terminals ................................................................................. 28 Non-cargo services ........................................................................................................... 30 Bunkering ......................................................................................................................... 30 Ship Repair ....................................................................................................................... 30 Financial performance and
    [Show full text]
  • UN/LOCODE) for South Africa
    United Nations Code for Trade and Transport Locations (UN/LOCODE) for South Africa N.B. To check the official, current database of UN/LOCODEs see: https://www.unece.org/cefact/locode/service/location.html UN/LOCODE Location Name State Functionality Status Coordinatesi ZA 2WC Klipheuwel WC Port; Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 3342S 01842E ZA 3WC Goudiniweg WC Port; Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 3436S 01919E ZA 7WC Riviersonderend WC Port; Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 3409S 01954E ZA 8GT Bottelary WC Port; Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 3308S 01806E ZA AAM Mala Mala Airport; Code adopted by IATA or ECLAC ZA ABT Alberton Road terminal; Recognised location 2615S 02807E ZA ADO Addo EC Road terminal; Recognised location 3334S 02541E ZA ADY Alldays Airport; Code adopted by IATA or ECLAC ZA AET Aeroton GT Road terminal; Recognised location 2615S 02758E ZA AFD Port Alfred Airport; Code adopted by IATA or ECLAC ZA AGP Algoapark EC Road terminal; Recognised location 3354S 02534E ZA AGZ Aggeneys Airport; Code adopted by IATA or ECLAC ZA ALH Lothair MP Road terminal; Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 2623S 03026E ZA ALI Alice EC Road terminal; Recognised location 3247S 02650E ZA ALJ Alexander Bay Airport; Approved by national facilitation body ZA ALN Alton NL Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 2846S 03201E ZA ALR Alrode Road terminal; Recognised location 2617S 02808E ZA AME Amersfoort MP Road terminal; Recognised location 2701S 02952E
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study for the Port of Ngqura
    COPE LEVELS IN MODERN PORTS: A CASE STUDY FOR THE PORT OF NGQURA TA AHMED1 and K MUTOMBO2 1Transnet National Ports Authority, Neptune Road, Port of Ngqura Cell: 072 392 0548; Email: [email protected] 2Transnet National Ports Authority, 30 Wellington Road, Parktown, Johannesburg Cell: 083 463 8092; Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Nowadays, with the increasing climatic challenges, ports are beset with many uncertainties about their futures. They are confronted with new demands for infrastructure adaptation, new external constraints, and changed expectations. The inability to adequately meet these demands will lead to huge consequences for a port. This is mainly attributed to the fact that traditional practices of port planning have remained static in an ever-increasing dynamic world. Predicting the future using linear tools for complex non-linear systems is bound to fail. A new complex non-linear approach is needed. The complex nature of climate risks presents major difficulties for port infrastructure adaptation. Despite the availability of climate data at large, there is presently no provision for a port wide approach for assessing and incorporating these data into port adaptation. This paper proposes a methodology for determining cope levels in ports. In order to demonstrate the applicability of the methodology, the port of Ngqura is used as a case study. Central to this study is the building of widespread industry recognition of the need to factor climate change into decision making at early stages of port development. 1. INTRODUCTION Since the end of apartheid, there have been remarkable progress in South Africa in terms of building an inclusive society, rolling back the shadow of history and broadening opportunities for all.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSNET SOC LTD and COEGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (CDC) COLLABORATE to ACCELERATE INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY
    TRANSNET SOC LTD and COEGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (CDC) COLLABORATE TO ACCELERATE INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY [Johannesburg, South Africa; 09 June 2021] Transnet SOC Ltd (“Transnet”) announced today that Transnet National Ports Authority (TNPA) has appointed the Coega Development Corporation (CDC) as the implementation agent for the migration of manganese terminal to the Port of Ngqura Liquid Bulk and Manganese Export Terminal. The CDC is the infrastructure implementing agent of choice in South Africa, working closely with government and state-owned companies to enhance the state’s capacity in the implementation of complex and mega infrastructure programmes. Currently, the CDC manages portfolios for itself and various public sector clients, with a portfolio of infrastructure projects to the value of approximately R5.3 billion. The CDC and TNPA are working to implement the terminal relocation projects, mainly the current operational Liquid Bulk and Manganese Terminals in Gqeberha at the Port of Port Elizabeth, within appropriate and realistic timelines. The CDC has been tasked to facilitate the construction and operationalisation of the Ngqura Liquid Bulk and the Ngqura Bulk Manganese facility. These facilities would be developed under the purview of Transnet, to assist and support their operationalisation. The CDC’s role will include the review of the design and scope of the work to ensure that modern, state of the art terminals that are designed to operate in accordance with world-class environmental standards and ensure their sustainability, in responsive to market needs. The current locations of the Tank Farm and the Manganese Terminal at the Port of Port Elizabeth are in areas that in future will be part of the Phase 2 of the proposed Waterfront Development, and an Automotive Terminal which aligns with the FORD SA R15.8 billion investment which requires exporting Fully Built Automotive Units (FBUs) through the Port of Port Elizabeth from the Tshwane Special Economic Zone, which is currently under construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality Comprehensive Integrated Transport Plan 2011/12
    NELSON MANDELA BAY MUNICIPALITY COMPREHENSIVE INTEGRATED TRANSPORT PLAN 2011/12 Prepared in terms of the National Land Transport Act (No 5 of 2009) by: SSI Engineers and Environmental Consultants PO Box 925 Port Elizabeth 6000 for the Infrastructure and Engineering Directorate Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality PO Box 7 Port Elizabeth 6000 March 2011 FINAL i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... I LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................ IV LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................................... VI ABBREVIATIONS USED ................................................................................................................................ VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... VIII 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 LEGISLATION AND NATIONAL REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................... 1 1.2 FORMAT OF THE CITP .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa: Fueling the Future of Shipping South Africa’S Role in the Transformation of Global Shipping Through Green Hydrogen-Derived Fuels
    South Africa: fueling the future of shipping South Africa’s role in the transformation of global shipping through green hydrogen-derived fuels By Ricardo For the & Environmental Defense Fund P4G Getting to Zero Coalition Partnership Zero carbon shipping in South Africa 2 Table of Contents Executive summary 6 Glossary 9 Introduction Assessing zero carbon shipping fuels for South Africa 10 Section 1 Zero carbon shipping powered by renewable electricity 13 Section 2 Zero carbon shipping fuels can be used safely 15 Section 3 Selection of zero carbon shipping fuels for South Africa 17 Section 4 South Africa is a major trading centre with a busy shipping sector 20 Section 5 South Africa relies on fossil fuels but has environmental ambitions 22 Section 6 South Africa has abundant renewable energy potential 24 Section 7 South Africa is in a strong position to produce zero carbon fuels 27 Section 8 Zero carbon shipping fuels: benefits far beyond shipping 29 Conclusions Opportunities for the economy and society 32 Case studies Three ports with different use cases for zero carbon fuels 36 References 42 Appendices 45 3 Zero carbon shipping in South Africa The Getting to Zero Coalition The Getting to Zero Coalition, a partnership between the Global Maritime Forum, Friends of Ocean Action and World Economic Forum, is a community of ambitious stakeholders from across the maritime, energy, infrastructure and financial sectors, and supported by key governments, IGOs and other stakeholders, who are committed to the decarbonization of shipping. The ambition of the Getting to Zero Coalition is to have commercially viable ZEVs operating along deep-sea trade routes by 2030, supported by the necessary infrastructure for scalable net zero-carbon energy sources including production, distribution, storage, and bunkering.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration of Ports and Railways in Southern Africa 2012
    INTEGRATION OF PORTS AND RAILWAYS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA SARA-International Conference Earle Peters National Planning Executive Transnet Port Terminals TABLE OF CONTENTS TRANSNET SOC LTD TRANSNET FREIGHT RAIL TRANSNET RAIL ENGINEERING TRANSNET NATIONAL PORTS AUTHORITY TRANSNET PORT TERMINALS MARKET DEMAND STRATEGY PORT DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PORT-RAIL INTERFACE PAGE 1 DELIVERING FREIGHT RELIABLY • “The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing.” • “If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.” • “Failure is simply an opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently.” • “Whether you think you can, or you think you can't …you're right.” - Henry Ford PAGE 2 TRANSNET OPERATES AN INTEGRATED PORT, RAIL AND PIPELINE NETWORK Musina Louis Trichardt Groenbult Lephalale Polokwane Phalaborwa Modimolle Komatiepoort Mafikeng Pretoria Nelspruit Johannesburg SWAZILAND Klerksdorp Ermelo Vereeniging Hotazel Vryburg Pudimoe Kroonstad Vryheid Nakop Sishen Veertien Strome Virginia Upington Bethlehem Harrismith Kimberley Ladysmith Bloemfontein Kakamas Richards Pietermaritzburg Bay LESOTHO Halfweg Durban Harding De Aar Aliwal North Port Shepstone Sakrivier Maclear Noupoort Calvinia Hutchinson Rosmead Umtata Hofmeyer Queenstown Beaufort West Cookhouse Blaney Saldanha Klipplaat Alicedale East London21,000 Km Rail Network Worcester Oudtshoorn Port Alfred 179 Million Tons of Cargo pa Cape Town Port Elizabeth Mosselbaai Knysna 4.3 Million TEU’s pa 17.8 Billion litres of fuel, oil PAGE 3 TRANSNET STATE OWNED COMPANY LTD - OPERATIONAL DIVISIONS Supporting • 16 Cargo Terminals operating across 7 SA ports • Revenue 7 bn • Assets R13.5 bn • 6 324 employees PAGE 4 TRANSNET SOC LTD - STRATEGIC GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK Mr. Brian Molefe Group Chief Executive Mr. Anoj Singh Chief Financial Officer Mr.
    [Show full text]