General Description of the Proposed Coega Integrated Power Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Description of the Proposed Coega Integrated Power Project CHAPTER 3: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED COEGA INTEGRATED POWER PROJECT GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED COEGA INTEGRATED POWER PROJECT CHAPTER 3 CONTENTS 3. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED COEGA INTEGRATED POWER PROJECT _______________________ 3-1 3.1 Overview of the Coega Integrated Power Project _________________3-1 3.2 Description of the proposed project____________________________3-1 3.2.1 LNG berth and terminal _________________________________________3-2 3.2.2 CCGT power plant _____________________________________________3-2 3.2.3 Gas reticulation network _________________________________________3-3 3.2.4 Electricity transmission network ___________________________________3-3 3.3 Location of the proposed project ______________________________3-4 3.3.1 International site selection process_________________________________3-4 3.3.2 National site selection process ____________________________________3-5 3.3.3 Identification of berthing locations within the Port of Ngqura _____________3-5 3.3.4 LNG terminal and CCGT power plant layout options ___________________3-7 FIGURES Figure 3.1: Alternative berth locations for the LNG carriers. ................................................3-6 Figure 3.2a: Alternative site option 1 for the LNG terminal and CCGT power plant.............3-8 Figure 3.2b: Alternative site option 2 for the LNG terminal and CCGT power plant.............3-9 Coega Integrated Power Project: Environmental Screening Study Final Report, February 2004 - Confidential page i GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED COEGA INTEGRATED POWER PROJECT CHAPTER 3 3. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED COEGA INTEGRATED POWER PROJECT 3.1 Overview of the Coega Integrated Power Project Under a Joint pre-Development Agreement (JPDA), Shell South Africa Energy (Shell) together with Eskom Holdings (Eskom) and a national gas infrastructure company (iGas), have been investigating the feasibility of developing an integrated LNG to power project within the Coega Industrial Development Zone (IDZ) near Port Elizabeth. This project would involve the following components: A Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) terminal, consisting of a berth with off-loading arms within the Port of Ngqura, cryogenic pipelines, storage and handling facilities and re- gasification modules; A combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plant; Gas pipelines for the transmission, distribution and reticulation of natural gas within the Coega Industrial Development Zone (IDZ) and Port of Ngqura; and electricity transmission lines linking the power plant to the national grid. This proposed project is collectively referred to in this study as the Coega Integrated Power Project (CIPP). 3.2 Description of the proposed project The project is based on the provision of natural gas from an appropriate reliable source, either via pipelines or as a liquid in LNG carriers (LNGC). In the case of the latter, LNG is manufactured at sophisticated facilities near the gas reserves, cleaned and dried, and then cooled to minus 160 degrees Celsius for transport via specially designed LNGCs to an LNG terminal where the LNG is regasified prior to further use. The proposed CIPP would involve importing 2 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) LNG to the Port of Ngqura, regasification and the utilization of 1.5 mtpa in a 1600 MW CCGT power plant, with the remaining 0.5 mtpa being distributed to gas users via a gas reticulation network. The LNG terminal and CCGT power plant are both predicted to operate for a minimum of 35 years. Construction of the LNG terminal and CCGT plant concurrently is estimated to take 3 years, with 2 years required prior to construction for detailed technical design, permitting and authorization, financial closure and investment decisions. From a national electricity perspective, it is important that the CIPP’s phasing correlates to market requirements where additional generation capacity is required from 2007 onwards. Coega Integrated Power Project: Environmental Screening Study Final Report, February 2004 - Confidential page 3-1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED COEGA INTEGRATED POWER PROJECT CHAPTER 3 CCGT power generation and LNG production, shipping, receiving and regasification technologies are in operation internationally, but do not currently exist in South Africa. Direct investments associated with the CIPP are estimated in the region of US$ 1 billion. The potential exists to expand the facilities, by increasing the gas import up to 5 mtpa or more, for use in increasing power generation capacity up to 3200 MW and gas sales to other markets. 3.2.1 LNG berth and terminal The LNG berth is being designed to accommodate the LNGCs up to 300 m long and 50 m wide, with a maximum draft of 12 m. Based on current assumptions, an LNG off-take of 1.5 mtpa for the CCGT plant will require one LNGC at berth every 16 days (or 23 times per year). Were market off-take to increase this 2 mtpa, one LNGC would berth every 13 days (or 29 times per year). During offloading, the LNG will be transferred in insulated cryogenic pipelines from the berth to the LNG storage tank(s). From there the LNG is sent to vaporization units where the temperature of the LNG is raised in a process to convert the liquid back to gas. Depending on the choice of vaporization technology, this heat can either be drawn from relatively warm seawater or other heat sources such as waste heat from a power plant. Technical integration of a regasification plant with a CCGT power plant could enhance efficiencies in both processes. The key infrastructural components of the proposed LNG terminal are listed below: LNG berth, with offloading arms Cryogenic pipelines from the berth to the on-land storage tanks On-land terminal facilities, including storage tank(s) Regasification plant. LNG berths and activities worldwide are governed by strict safety zones and codes of practice. A safety zone of up to 200 m radius is required around the LNGC manifold offloading arm; or 50 m from the side of the vessel itself. An exclusion zone is also required for 5 m on either side of the cryogenic pipeline. For the on-land facilities, a 200 m radius exclusion zone is required around the LNG vaporisation process area. 3.2.2 CCGT power plant A CCGT power plant uses a composite thermodynamic process and has thermal efficiencies far greater than other generation technology options (Eskom, Shell and iGas, 2003). The availability of seawater for cooling purposes influences the choice of CCGT technology and Coega Integrated Power Project: Environmental Screening Study Final Report, February 2004 - Confidential page 3-2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED COEGA INTEGRATED POWER PROJECT CHAPTER 3 the proposed 1 600 MW CCGT power plant is based on the ability to abstract approximately 100 000 m3 per hour of seawater. With an LNG requirement of 1.5 mtpa, the CCGT power plant is the anchor user for the LNG supply and import and regasification facilities. The CCGT power plant consists of the following key components: Combined cycle gas turbine Heat recovery steam generators (HRSG) Gas turbines Closed cooling water system. 3.2.3 Gas reticulation network A gas reticulation network from the port is planned, when the market demand increases with the growth of the IDZ. It is planned that 0.5 mtpa of the original 2 mtpa to be imported will be utilized by the gas reticulation network. Gas transfer pipelines will require a servitude approximately 20 m wide. 3.2.4 Electricity transmission network This section is based on discussions with Ronald Marais, Eskom (Transmission) on 27 November 2003. The CCGT power plant will transfer power into the national grid via the Grassridge substation and adjacent Dedisa substation, which are located just outside the IDZ boundary and approximately 10 km north-west of the proposed CIPP site. The design of the configuration of transmission lines within the grid is a complex process, dependent on the increase in power demand in the Eastern Cape, and the timing of when power from the CIPP and/or other generation sources come on-line. At present the amount of power being provided to the Eastern Cape (approximately 1100 MW) is approaching the maximum limit that the existing infrastructure can deliver. However, it is expected that power demand will increase significantly in the next 5 to 15 years. In particular, the NMMM area is predicted to experience a growth in power demand from current levels of approximately 600 MW to in the order of 2000 to 3000 MW, largely as a result of energy intensive industrial developments located within the Coega IDZ. This will require additional power generation capacity, which could partially be met by the proposed CIPP. The source of power therefore influences the transmission line configuration. A further factor that has to be considered is that the CIPP needs adequate “release” lines, i.e. lines to transmit to the power out of the NMMM area, if a major local consumer of power (for example, an aluminium smelter) were to stop drawing power. Coega Integrated Power Project: Environmental Screening Study Final Report, February 2004 - Confidential page 3-3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED COEGA INTEGRATED POWER PROJECT CHAPTER 3 Generation of 1600 MW of power from the CCGT plant will require three 400 kV transmission lines from the plant to the Grassridge substation. Transmission capacity from the Poseidon substation (near the town of Cookhouse) to Grassridge is currently being increased, with a third line to be constructed from 2005. Poseidon links Grassridge to the central transmission corridor from the highveld to the Cape area. This additional transmission capacity is currently expected to provide sufficient “release” capacity for the 1600 MW plant. If the power generation from the CIPP is increased to 2400 MW, then four 400 kV transmission lines would be required. No additional release lines would be necessary. If power generation is increased to 3200 MW, then a fifth release line would be needed to a new substation which will need to be integrated into the 400kV network.
Recommended publications
  • Population Trends of Seabirds Breeding in South Africa's Eastern Cape and the Possible Influence of Anthropogenic and Environ
    Crawford et al.: Population trends of seabirds breeding in South Africa 159 POPULATION TRENDS OF SEABIRDS BREEDING IN SOUTH AFRICA’S EASTERN CAPE AND THE POSSIBLE INFLUENCE OF ANTHROPOGENIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE ROBERT J.M. CRAWFORD,1,2 PHILIP A. WHITTINGTON,3,4 A. PAUL MARTIN,5 ANTHONY J. TREE4,6 & AZWIANEWI B. MAKHADO1 1Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Marine and Coastal Management, Private Bag X2, Rogge Bay, 8012, South Africa ([email protected]) 2Animal Demography Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa 3East London Museum, PO Box 11021, Southernwood, 5213, South Africa 4Department of Zoology, PO Box 77000, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, 6031, South Africa 5PO Box 61029, Bluewater Bay, 6212, South Africa 6PO Box 211, Bathurst, 6166, South Africa Received 28 August 2008, accepted 4 April 2009 SUMMARY CRAWFORD, R.J.M., WHITTINGTON, P.A., MARTIN, A.P., TREE, A.J. & MAKHADO, A.B. 2009. Population trends of seabirds breeding in South Africa’s Eastern Cape and the possible influence of anthropogenic and environmental change. Marine Ornithology 37: 159–174. Eleven species of seabird breed in South Africa’s Eastern Cape Province. Numbers of African Penguin Spheniscus demersus and Cape Gannet Morus capensis in the province increased in the 20th century, but penguins decreased in the early 21st century. A recent eastward displacement of Sardine Sardinops sagax off South Africa increased the availability of this food source to gannets but did not benefit penguins, which have a shorter foraging range. Fishing and harbour developments may have influenced the recent decrease of penguins.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Participation Process: Bayview Wind Farmdraft
    PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS: BAYVIEW WIND FARM DRAFT AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) 1. PROOF OF SITE NOTICE DATE PLACED: 21 AUGUST 2020 LOCATION: 33°43'2.91"S, 25°35'42.66"E (along the R335 road) 1 2 2. UPDATED STAKEHOLDER AND I&AP DATABASE BAYVIEW WIND FARM: UPDATED STAKEHOLDER AND I&AP DATABASE AFFECTED PROPERTY, COMPANY OR TELEPHONE CONTACT PERSON ADDRESS EMAIL ADDRESS DEPARTMENT NUMBER Remaining Extent of the Farm Jakkie Erasmus and Elma 0825745653 PO Box 1197, Uitenhage, 6230 [email protected] Oliphants Kop 201 Erasmus 0722295169 Portion 4 of the Farm Steins Valley 084 854 4774 SP Meiring PO Box 126, Kirkwood, 6120 [email protected] 202 042 230 0426 Remaining Extent of Portion 8 of the Johan Hugo 083 233 3176 - [email protected] Farm Ebb and Vloed 230, Portion 1 of the Farm Oliphants Kop 201 PPC Cement 011 386 9489 Private Bag 2016, North End, 6056, Port [email protected] Remaining Extent of the Farm Aili Zeeman 078 450 7009 Elizabeth Grassridge 225, Remaining Extent Coega Development Corporation Coega IDZ Business Centre, Corner (CDC) 041 403 0664 Remaining Extent of Coega Erf 248 Alcyon Road & Zibuko Street, Port [email protected] Operations project manager: 082 657 4648 Elizabeth, 6100 Andrea Shirley ESKOM 041 405 0515 Uitenhage Farms 612 - [email protected] Eddie Leach 011 800 8111 Remaining Extent of the Farm PPC Cement 011 386 9489 Grassridge 227 Aili Zeeman Private Bag 2016, North End, 6056, Port [email protected] 078 450 7009 Remaining Extent of the Farm Elizabeth Geluksdal 590 Magnus
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Description of the Affected Environment
    Proposed extension to the container berth and construction of an administration craft basin at the Port of Ngqura Chapter 3 : Description of the Affected Environment Chapter 3: Description of the Affected Environment Final Scoping Report – CSIR, April 2007 Page i Proposed extension to the container berth and construction of an administration craft basin at the Port of Ngqura Chapter 3 : Description of the Affected Environment Description of the Affected Environment 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT________ 3-1 3.1 Introduction _________________________________________________________3-1 3.2 Site location_________________________________________________________3-1 3.3 Biophysical environment _______________________________________________3-2 3.3.1 Climate ____________________________________________________________ 3-2 3.3.2 Terrestrial features: landscape and geology ________________________________ 3-2 3.3.3 Vegetation __________________________________________________________ 3-3 3.3.4 Birds ______________________________________________________________ 3-3 3.3.5 Marine ecosystems ___________________________________________________ 3-3 3.4 Socio-economic environment ___________________________________________3-4 3.4.1 Demographics and human development___________________________________ 3-4 3.4.2 In-migration _________________________________________________________ 3-4 3.4.3 Initiatives to promote economic development _______________________________ 3-5 Final Scoping Report – CSIR, April 2007 Page ii Proposed extension to the
    [Show full text]
  • Nelson Mandela Bay ULI Panel Report
    Port Elizabeth Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality South Africa November 1–6, 2015 Advisory ServicesReport Panel A ULI Port Elizabeth Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality South Africa Connectivity and Regeneration in the Baakens River Valley Precinct November 1–6, 2015 Advisory Services Panel Report A ULI A ULI About the Urban Land Institute THE MISSION OF THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE is ■■ Sustaining a diverse global network of local practice to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in and advisory efforts that address current and future creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. challenges. ULI is committed to Established in 1936, the Institute today has more than ■■ Bringing together leaders from across the fields of real 38,000 members worldwide, representing the entire spec- estate and land use policy to exchange best practices trum of the land use and development disciplines. Profes- and serve community needs; sionals represented include developers, builders, property owners, investors, architects, public officials, planners, ■■ Fostering collaboration within and beyond ULI’s real estate brokers, appraisers, attorneys, engineers, membership through mentoring, dialogue, and problem financiers, academics, students, and librarians. solving; ULI relies heavily on the experience of its members. It is ■■ Exploring issues of urbanization, conservation, regen- through member involvement and information resources eration, land use, capital formation, and sustainable that ULI has been able to set standards of excellence in development; development practice. The Institute has long been rec- ■■ Advancing land use policies and design practices that ognized as one of the world’s most respected and widely respect the uniqueness of both the built and natural quoted sources of objective information on urban planning, environments; growth, and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeontological Impact Assessment: Desktop Study
    PALAEONTOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: DESKTOP STUDY Proposed construction of two filling stations adjacent to the N2, Zones 1 and 2 of the Coega IDZ, Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality, Eastern Cape Province John E. Almond PhD (Cantab.) Natura Viva cc, PO Box 12410 Mill Street, Cape Town 8010, RSA [email protected] April 2010 1. SUMMARY The two proposed filling station developments are located either side of the N2 in Zones 1 and 2 of the Coega IDZ, between St George’s Strand and Motherwell, Nelson Bay Municipality. Both development sites are underlain by limestone-rich shallow marine sediments of the Alexandria Formation (Algoa Group), with intermittent cover of pebbly residual weathering products (the so-called Bluewater Bay Formation). The Alexandria Formation has a high palaeontological sensitivity since it hosts a rich fossil marine biota of Miocene to Pliocene age that is dominated by molluscs and various other invertebrates, together with rare fish and (possibly) other vertebrate remains. Although much of the Alexandria Formation within the Coega IDZ has been altered by weathering and calcretization, seriously reducing its fossil content, the two filling station developments are situated close to an established fossil site (an abandoned limestone quarry) within this formation. Palaeontological mitigation is therefore recommended in both cases. Should thin sandstones and mudrocks of the Sundays River Formation beneath the Algoa Group limestone capping be exposed during deep excavations, these potentially fossil-rich sediments will also require palaeontological mitigation. Mitigation by a qualified palaeontologist should entail (a) the field examination of new excavations, (b) the recording of sedimentological and palaeontological data, (c) the judicious sampling of fossil material and (d) recommendations for any further action required to safeguard fossil heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrade of Main Road 435, Coega Industrial Development Zone, Eastern Cape
    UPGRADE OF MAIN ROAD 435, COEGA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONE, EASTERN CAPE FINAL SCOPING REPORT Prepared by Coastal & Environmental Services P.O. Box 934 Grahamstown 6140 For Coega Industrial Development Zone and Port Libra Chambers Oakworth Road Humerail Port Elizabeth 6001 C/O Ninham Shand/Manong & Associates Joint Venture 120 Villiers Road Walmer 6070 Port Elizabeth March 2005 Coastal & Environmental Services TABLE OF CONTENT SECTION 1: SCOPING REPORT ................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Brief project description ........................................................................................... 1 1.3 Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Project methodology ................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Scope of work .......................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Study team .............................................................................................................. 4 1.7 Structure of report ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Explore the Eastern Cape Province
    Cultural Guiding - Explore The Eastern Cape Province Former President Nelson Mandela, who was born and raised in the Transkei, once said: "After having travelled to many distant places, I still find the Eastern Cape to be a region full of rich, unused potential." 2 – WildlifeCampus Cultural Guiding Course – Eastern Cape Module # 1 - Province Overview Component # 1 - Eastern Cape Province Overview Module # 2 - Cultural Overview Component # 1 - Eastern Cape Cultural Overview Module # 3 - Historical Overview Component # 1 - Eastern Cape Historical Overview Module # 4 - Wildlife and Nature Conservation Overview Component # 1 - Eastern Cape Wildlife and Nature Conservation Overview Module # 5 - Nelson Mandela Bay Metropole Component # 1 - Explore the Nelson Mandela Bay Metropole Module # 6 - Sarah Baartman District Municipality Component # 1 - Explore the Sarah Baartman District (Part 1) Component # 2 - Explore the Sarah Baartman District (Part 2) Component # 3 - Explore the Sarah Baartman District (Part 3) Component # 4 - Explore the Sarah Baartman District (Part 4) Module # 7 - Chris Hani District Municipality Component # 1 - Explore the Chris Hani District Module # 8 - Joe Gqabi District Municipality Component # 1 - Explore the Joe Gqabi District Module # 9 - Alfred Nzo District Municipality Component # 1 - Explore the Alfred Nzo District Module # 10 - OR Tambo District Municipality Component # 1 - Explore the OR Tambo District Eastern Cape Province Overview This course material is the copyrighted intellectual property of WildlifeCampus.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Cape Heritage
    EASTERN CAPE HERITAGE mirrored in its port terminals EAST LONDON In 1836 a surfboat service was provided for the will contain a total of 32 berths stretching further In 1825 the mouth of the Kowie River in Port handling of cargo and passengers, with the fi rst up the Coega River valley and along the south- Alfred was identifi ed as a site for a port and jetty constructed in 1837. western coast. terminal. This was abandoned after the river By 1877 Port Elizabeth had become the busiest Work has started on new fuel and manganese mouth was found to be too shallow and liable South African port. terminals to replace those in the port of to silting. However, the Charl Malan Quay (present container Port Elizabeth. Construction on the main harbour began in terminal) was only built in 1933, by which time Ngqura is the main transhipment hub for the 1872, and in 1873 work began on the breakwater. Cape Town and Durban had taken much of the South African port system. The original name was Port Rex. traffi c away due to their superior facilities In 2012/2013 Ngqura was the fastest-growing The unusual double-decker bridge (road over rail) NGQURA container terminal in the world, according to Drewry Consultants. Steve Biko bridge spanning the Buffalo River was The construction of the port was authorised by completed in 1935 and to this day, is the only the South African parliament in 2002. bridge of its type in South Africa. It is the eighth port to be operated by Transnet Built in the 1970s, the grain elevator on the Port Terminals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phase 1 Archaeological Heritage Impact Assessment
    A PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE GREATER COEGA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONE (IDZ), NEAR PORT ELIZABETH, NELSON MANDELA BAY MUNICIPALITY, EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE Prepared for: Coega Industrial Development Corporation (Pty) Ltd Contact person: Ms A.von Holdt Private Bag X6009 Port Elizabeth 6000 Tel: 041 4030400 Fax: 041 4030401 Cell: 0826574648 email: [email protected] Compiled by: Dr Johan Binneman On behalf of: Eastern Cape Heritage Consultants P.O. Box 689 Jeffreys Bay 6330 Tel: 042 962096 Cell: 0728006322 email: [email protected] Date: May 2010 CONTENTS SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT INFORMATION .................................................................................................... 2 BRIEF ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND OF THE COEGA REGION....................... 3 CULTURAL SENSITIVITY OF THE COEGA REGION ………………………………….. 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY .................................................................................... 9 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION.............................................................................. 9 Zone 1 ………………………………………………………………………………. 11 Zone 2 ………………………………………………………………………………. 13 Zone 3 ………………………………………………………………………………. 15 Zone 4 ………………………………………………………………………………. 15 Zone 6 ………………………………………………………………………………. 17 Zone 7 ………………………………………………………………………………. 19 Zone 9 ………………………………………………………………………………. 21 Zone 10 …………………………………………………………………………..…. 23 Zone 11 ………………………………………………..…………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Draft EIA Report March2013 Chap 3 Environmental Desc
    CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3-3 3.1 BACKGROUND 3-3 3.2 SITE LOCATION 3-3 3.3 BIOPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 3-7 3.3.1 CLIMATE 3-7 3.3.2 LANDSCAPE AND GEOLOGY 3-10 3.3.2.1 Landscape 3-10 3.3.2.2 Geological setting 3-10 3.3.3 SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER 3-11 3.3.3.1 Surface water 3-11 3.3.3.2 Groundwater 3-11 3.3.3.3 Surface water and groundwater monitoring 3-11 3.3.4 AIR QUALITY 3-12 3.3.5 VEGETATION 3-13 3.3.6 FAUNA 3-14 3.3.6.1 Avifauna 3-14 3.3.6.2 Terrestrial Fauna 3-14 3.3.7 MARINE ENVIRONMENT: PORT OF NGQURA 3-14 3.3.8 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY OF ALGOA BAY 3-15 3.3.9 MARINE BIOTA 3-16 3.4 HERITAGE RESOURCES 3-16 3.5 SOCIO-ECONOMIC 3-17 3.5.1 DEMOGRAPHICS AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN THE EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE 3-17 3.5.2 DEMOGRAPHICS AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN THE NMBM 3-19 3.5.3 INITIATIVES TO PROMOTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3-21 3.5.4 LABOUR MANAGEMENT 3-21 3.6 LAND-USE CONTEXT AND SENSE OF PLACE 3-21 3.7 COEGA OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN 3-23 3.8 BIODIVERSITY PLANNING FRAMEWORKS 3-24 CSIR –March 2013 pg 3-1 CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT TABLES AND FIGURES Table 3.1: Description of Registered Landowners for the Manganese Export Terminal Project 3-4 Table 3.2: Wind Speed, Relative Humidity and Ambient Temperature Measurements at the Amsterdamplein, Motherwell and Saltworks station 3-10 Table 3.3 Biodiversity planning resources 3-24 Figure 3.1a: Tankatara Farm and the Coega IDZ 3-5 Figure 3.1b: Demarcated Zones within the Coega IDZ and Tankatara Trust No.
    [Show full text]
  • Algoa Bay Management Plan
    ALGOA BAY MANAGEMENT PLAN Vision Algoa Bay is a multi-use coastal zone that requires a proactive and practical management plan based on scientific integrity and stakeholder participation to ensure future sustainable development Prepared by: CLABBS Consortium c/o 36 River Road, Walmer, Port Elizabeth 6070 Tel: 041 581 2983 Fax: 041 581 2983 Email : [email protected] For: African Environmental Solutions P.O. Box 53577 Kenilworth 7745 The contributors cannot be held responsible for any damages whatsoever (including without limitation, damages for loss of trade or business profits, business interruption or any other pecuniary loss) arising out of the adoption of any scientific advice or recommended guidelines in this management plan DECEMBER 1999 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Algoa Bay is a multi-use coastal zone with a variety of interest groups. Threats to and impacts on the environment will therefore affect both the commercial and the recreational interests in the area. This report outlines the rationale towards, and the development of, a management plan for Algoa Bay, for the marine environment below the spring high-water mark between Cape Recife and Woody Cape. The Algoa Bay Management Plan is a holistic document, drawing on previous environmental studies and has aimed to consolidate the ideas of all interested and affected parties. The plan has built on some previous public participation during previous environmental studies and has included some further consultation with management authorities locally and nationally (Port Elizabeth Municipality, University of Port Elizabeth, Portnet, Coega IA, Bay World and MCM). The development of the plan has defined critical issues and concentrated on these.
    [Show full text]
  • Algoa Bay Sea-Based Aquaculture Development Zone
    ALGOA BAY SEA-BASED AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT ZONE BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN TERMS OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT, 1998 (ACT NO. 107 OF 1998) Draft Basic Assessment Report July 2019 research & monitoring Anchor Research and Monitoring Report No. 1808/1 ALGOA BAY SEA-BASED AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT ZONE BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN TERMS OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT, 1998 (ACT NO. 107 OF 1998) Draft Basic Assessment Report July 2019 Report Prepared for: Department of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries Report Prepared by: research & monitoring 8 Steenberg House, Silverwood Close, Tokai 7945, South Africa https://anchorenvironmental.co.za Authors: Vera Massie, Barry Clark, Kenneth Hutchings, Jessica Dawson, Erika Brown, Amy Wright and Megan Laird Title Page Photo Credit: Shutterstock Citation: Massie V, Clark B, Hutchings K, Dawson J, Brown E, Wright A and Laird M. 2019. Proposed Sea-based Aquaculture Development Zone in Algoa Bay, Eastern Cape – Draft Basic Assessment Report in Terms of the National Environmental Management Act (107 of 1998). Report prepared for the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries by Anchor Research and Monitoring (Pty) Ltd. June 2019. research & monitoring PROJECT DETAILS Objective Application for Environmental Authorisation in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No 107 of 1998) Applicant Department of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries Environmental Assessment Practitioner Vera Massie under supervision of Dr Barry Clark from Anchor Research (EAP) & Monitoring (Pty) Ltd Anchor Project Name Algoa Bay Sea-based Aquaculture Development Zone Basic Assessment Process Anchor Project Number 1808 Report name Algoa Bay Sea-based Aquaculture Development Zone, Basic Assessment Process in Terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No.
    [Show full text]