DOCSLIB.ORG

Algoa Bay Sea-Based Aquaculture Development Zone

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Algoa Bay Sea-Based Aquaculture Development Zone ALGOA BAY SEA-BASED AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT ZONE BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN TERMS OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT, 1998 (ACT NO. 107 OF 1998) Draft Basic Assessment Report July 2019 research & monitoring Anchor Research and Monitoring Report No. 1808/1 ALGOA BAY SEA-BASED AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT ZONE BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN TERMS OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT, 1998 (ACT NO. 107 OF 1998) Draft Basic Assessment Report July 2019 Report Prepared for: Department of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries Report Prepared by: research & monitoring 8 Steenberg House, Silverwood Close, Tokai 7945, South Africa https://anchorenvironmental.co.za Authors: Vera Massie, Barry Clark, Kenneth Hutchings, Jessica Dawson, Erika Brown, Amy Wright and Megan Laird Title Page Photo Credit: Shutterstock Citation: Massie V, Clark B, Hutchings K, Dawson J, Brown E, Wright A and Laird M. 2019. Proposed Sea-based Aquaculture Development Zone in Algoa Bay, Eastern Cape – Draft Basic Assessment Report in Terms of the National Environmental Management Act (107 of 1998). Report prepared for the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries by Anchor Research and Monitoring (Pty) Ltd. June 2019. research & monitoring PROJECT DETAILS Objective Application for Environmental Authorisation in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No 107 of 1998) Applicant Department of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries Environmental Assessment Practitioner Vera Massie under supervision of Dr Barry Clark from Anchor Research (EAP) & Monitoring (Pty) Ltd Anchor Project Name Algoa Bay Sea-based Aquaculture Development Zone Basic Assessment Process Anchor Project Number 1808 Report name Algoa Bay Sea-based Aquaculture Development Zone, Basic Assessment Process in Terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 Of 1998) - Draft Basic Assessment Report Status Application phase Application submission date To be confirmed Competent Authority Reference Not currently assigned Case Officer Not currently assigned OVERVIEW OF PROJECT OUTPUTS BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT AND APPENDICES Basic Assessment Pre-Application BAR – Released for comment between 28 March and 30 April 2019 Report (BAR) Draft BAR - Current Final BAR – To be completed after application-phase public participation period Appendix A Environmental Management Programme (EMPr) Appendix B Details of EAP, Expertise and Declaration Appendix C Details of Specialists, Expertise and Declaration Appendix D Specialist studies: 1. Benthic Mapping Assessment for the Proposed Algoa Bay Sea-based Aquaculture Development Zone (Dawson et al. 2019) 2. Dispersion Modelling Study for the Proposed Algoa Bay Sea-based Aquaculture Development Zone (Wright et al. 2019) 3. Marine Specialist Study 2019 (Hutchings et al. 2019) 4. Maritime Underwater Heritage Specialist Study (Gribble 2019) 5. Comparative Assessments for the Development of the Proposed Sea-based Aquaculture Development Zone Located within Algoa Bay in the Eastern Cape in South Africa (Rhodes University August 2016) a. Socio-economic Report b. Ecological Report c. Feasibility study Appendix E Background Information Document Appendix F Stakeholder Consultation Report i research & monitoring NOTE: In response to stakeholder comments, the pre-application Basic Assessment Report (BAR) (Anchor Report 1808/1) was updated at the end of the pre-application commenting period (28 March – 30 April 2019) to produce the Draft BAR. All changes to the content in the Draft BAR are underlined for easier reference. A Stakeholder Consultation Report, reflecting stakeholder comments received during the pre-application stakeholder engagement process and responses by Anchor, specialists and DAFF, is included in Appendix F. ii research & monitoring COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST Regulation 326 of NEMA, Appendix 1 Section 3: “Scope of assessment and content of basic assessment reports” The following table is included as a guide for stakeholders and officials reviewing this report during the commenting and decision-making period. The table below contains the minimum requirements for a Basic Assessment Report as detailed in Sub-section (1) and guides the reader to the relevant Chapter/Sections/Appendices where specific aspects are detailed. Sub- Requirement Chapter/Section/ section Appendix reference (a) Details of – Section 3.5.1 and (i) the EAP who prepared the report; and Appendix B (ii) the expertise of the EAP, including a curriculum vitae; (b) The location of the activity, including: Section 3.5 (i) the 21 digit Surveyor General code of each cadastral land parcel; (ii) where available, the physical address and farm name; (iii) where the required information in items (i) and (ii) is not available, the (iv) coordinates of the boundary of the property or properties; (c) A plan which locates the proposed activity or activities applied for as well as Section 4.5 associated structures and infrastructure at an appropriate scale; or, if it is— (i) a linear activity, a description and coordinates of the corridor in which the proposed activity or activities is to be undertaken; or (ii) on land where the property has not been defined, the coordinates within which the activity is to be undertaken; (d) A description of the scope of the proposed activity, including— Section 5.2 and (i) all listed and specified activities triggered and being applied for; and Chapter 4 (ii) a description of the activities to be undertaken including associated structures and infrastructure (e) A description of the policy and legislative context within which the development Chapter 4 and is proposed including— Chapter 7 (i) an identification of all legislation, policies, plans, guidelines, spatial tools, municipal development planning frameworks, and instruments that are applicable to this activity and have been considered in the preparation of the report; and (ii) how the proposed activity complies with and responds to the legislation and policy context, plans, guidelines, tools frameworks, and instruments; (f) A motivation for the need and desirability for the proposed development Chapter 6 including the need and desirability of the activity in the context of the preferred location; (g) A motivation for the preferred site, activity and technology alternative; To be completed (h) A full description of the process followed to reach the proposed preferred Section 4.5, alternative within the site, including – Appendix F, Chapter (i) details of all the alternatives considered 9, Chapter 10, (ii) details of the public participation process undertaken in terms of Chapter 11, Chapter regulation 41 of the Regulations, including copies of the supporting 2 documents and inputs; iii research & monitoring Sub- Requirement Chapter/Section/ section Appendix reference (iii) a summary of the issues raised by interested and affected parties, and an indication of the manner in which the issues were incorporated, or the reasons for not including them (iv) the environmental attributes associated with the alternatives focusing on the geographical, physical, biological, social, economic, heritage and cultural aspects; (v) the impacts and risks identified for each alternative, including the nature, significance, consequence, extent, duration and probability of the impacts, including the degree to which these impacts— a. can be reversed; b. may cause irreplaceable loss of resources; and c. can be avoided, managed or mitigated; (vi) the methodology used in determining and ranking the nature, significance, (vii) consequences, extent, duration and probability of potential environmental impacts and risks associated with the alternatives; (viii) positive and negative impacts that the proposed activity and alternatives will have on the environment and on the community that may be affected focusing on the geographical, physical, biological, social, economic, heritage and cultural aspects; (ix) the possible mitigation measures that could be applied and level of residual risk; (x) the outcome of the site selection matrix; (xi) if no alternatives, including alternative locations for the activity were investigated, the motivation for not considering such; and (xii) a concluding statement indicating the preferred alternatives, including preferred location of the activity; (i) A full description of the process undertaken to identify, assess and rank the Section 10.2 impacts the activity will impose on the preferred location through the life of the activity, including— (i) a description of all environmental issues and risks that were identified during the environmental impact assessment process; and (ii) an assessment of the significance of each issue and risk and an indication of the extent to which the issue and risk could be avoided or addressed by the adoption of mitigation measures; (j) An assessment of each identified potentially significant impact and risk, Chapter 10 including— (i) cumulative impacts; (ii) the nature, significance and consequences of the impact and risk; (iii) the extent and duration of the impact and risk; (iv) the probability of the impact and risk occurring; (v) the degree to which the impact and risk can be reversed; (vi) the degree to which the impact and risk may cause irreplaceable loss of (i) resources; and (ii) the degree to which the impact and risk can be avoided, managed or mitigated; (k) Where applicable, a summary of the findings and impact management measures Section 10.3 identified in any specialist report complying with Appendix 6 to these Regulations and an indication
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Population Trends of Seabirds Breeding in South Africa's Eastern Cape and the Possible Influence of Anthropogenic and Environ
    Crawford et al.: Population trends of seabirds breeding in South Africa 159 POPULATION TRENDS OF SEABIRDS BREEDING IN SOUTH AFRICA’S EASTERN CAPE AND THE POSSIBLE INFLUENCE OF ANTHROPOGENIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE ROBERT J.M. CRAWFORD,1,2 PHILIP A. WHITTINGTON,3,4 A. PAUL MARTIN,5 ANTHONY J. TREE4,6 & AZWIANEWI B. MAKHADO1 1Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Marine and Coastal Management, Private Bag X2, Rogge Bay, 8012, South Africa ([email protected]) 2Animal Demography Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa 3East London Museum, PO Box 11021, Southernwood, 5213, South Africa 4Department of Zoology, PO Box 77000, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, 6031, South Africa 5PO Box 61029, Bluewater Bay, 6212, South Africa 6PO Box 211, Bathurst, 6166, South Africa Received 28 August 2008, accepted 4 April 2009 SUMMARY CRAWFORD, R.J.M., WHITTINGTON, P.A., MARTIN, A.P., TREE, A.J. & MAKHADO, A.B. 2009. Population trends of seabirds breeding in South Africa’s Eastern Cape and the possible influence of anthropogenic and environmental change. Marine Ornithology 37: 159–174. Eleven species of seabird breed in South Africa’s Eastern Cape Province. Numbers of African Penguin Spheniscus demersus and Cape Gannet Morus capensis in the province increased in the 20th century, but penguins decreased in the early 21st century. A recent eastward displacement of Sardine Sardinops sagax off South Africa increased the availability of this food source to gannets but did not benefit penguins, which have a shorter foraging range. Fishing and harbour developments may have influenced the recent decrease of penguins.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Wioresearchcompendium.Pdf
    Compiling authors Dr Angus Paterson Prof. Juliet Hermes Dr Tommy Bornman Tracy Klarenbeek Dr Gilbert Siko Rose Palmer Report design: Rose Palmer Contributing authors Prof. Janine Adams Ms Maryke Musson Prof. Isabelle Ansorge Mr Mduduzi Mzimela Dr Björn Backeberg Mr Ashley Naidoo Prof. Paulette Bloomer Dr Larry Oellermann Dr Thomas Bornman Ryan Palmer Dr Hayley Cawthra Dr Angus Paterson Geremy Cliff Dr Brilliant Petja Prof. Rosemary Dorrington Nicole du Plessis Dr Thembinkosi Steven Dlaza Dr Anthony Ribbink Prof. Ken Findlay Prof. Chris Reason Prof. William Froneman Prof. Michael Roberts Dr Enrico Gennari Prof. Mathieu Rouault Dr Issufo Halo Prof. Ursula Scharler Dr. Jean Harris Dr Gilbert Siko Prof. Juliet Hermes Dr Kerry Sink Dr Jenny Huggett Dr Gavin Snow Tracy Klarenbeek Johan Stander Prof. Mandy Lombard Dr Neville Sweijd Neil Malan Prof. Peter Teske Benita Maritz Dr Niall Vine Meaghen McCord Prof. Sophie von der Heydem Tammy Morris SA RESEARCH IN THE WIO ContEnts INDEX of rEsEarCh topiCs ‑ 2 introDuCtion ‑ 3 thE WEstErn inDian oCEan ‑ 4 rEsEarCh ActivitiEs ‑ 6 govErnmEnt DEpartmEnts ‑ 7 Department of Science & Technology (DST) Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) Department of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries (DAFF) sCiEnCE CounCils & rEsEarCh institutions ‑ 13 National Research Foundation (NRF) Council for Geoscience (CGS) Council for Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) Institute for Maritime Technology (IMT) KwaZulu-Natal Sharks Board (KZNSB) South African Environmental Observation Network (SAEON) Egagasini node South African
    [Show full text]
  • Public Participation Process: Bayview Wind Farmdraft
    PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS: BAYVIEW WIND FARM DRAFT AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) 1. PROOF OF SITE NOTICE DATE PLACED: 21 AUGUST 2020 LOCATION: 33°43'2.91"S, 25°35'42.66"E (along the R335 road) 1 2 2. UPDATED STAKEHOLDER AND I&AP DATABASE BAYVIEW WIND FARM: UPDATED STAKEHOLDER AND I&AP DATABASE AFFECTED PROPERTY, COMPANY OR TELEPHONE CONTACT PERSON ADDRESS EMAIL ADDRESS DEPARTMENT NUMBER Remaining Extent of the Farm Jakkie Erasmus and Elma 0825745653 PO Box 1197, Uitenhage, 6230 [email protected] Oliphants Kop 201 Erasmus 0722295169 Portion 4 of the Farm Steins Valley 084 854 4774 SP Meiring PO Box 126, Kirkwood, 6120 [email protected] 202 042 230 0426 Remaining Extent of Portion 8 of the Johan Hugo 083 233 3176 - [email protected] Farm Ebb and Vloed 230, Portion 1 of the Farm Oliphants Kop 201 PPC Cement 011 386 9489 Private Bag 2016, North End, 6056, Port [email protected] Remaining Extent of the Farm Aili Zeeman 078 450 7009 Elizabeth Grassridge 225, Remaining Extent Coega Development Corporation Coega IDZ Business Centre, Corner (CDC) 041 403 0664 Remaining Extent of Coega Erf 248 Alcyon Road & Zibuko Street, Port [email protected] Operations project manager: 082 657 4648 Elizabeth, 6100 Andrea Shirley ESKOM 041 405 0515 Uitenhage Farms 612 - [email protected] Eddie Leach 011 800 8111 Remaining Extent of the Farm PPC Cement 011 386 9489 Grassridge 227 Aili Zeeman Private Bag 2016, North End, 6056, Port [email protected] 078 450 7009 Remaining Extent of the Farm Elizabeth Geluksdal 590 Magnus
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Description of the Affected Environment
    Proposed extension to the container berth and construction of an administration craft basin at the Port of Ngqura Chapter 3 : Description of the Affected Environment Chapter 3: Description of the Affected Environment Final Scoping Report – CSIR, April 2007 Page i Proposed extension to the container berth and construction of an administration craft basin at the Port of Ngqura Chapter 3 : Description of the Affected Environment Description of the Affected Environment 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT________ 3-1 3.1 Introduction _________________________________________________________3-1 3.2 Site location_________________________________________________________3-1 3.3 Biophysical environment _______________________________________________3-2 3.3.1 Climate ____________________________________________________________ 3-2 3.3.2 Terrestrial features: landscape and geology ________________________________ 3-2 3.3.3 Vegetation __________________________________________________________ 3-3 3.3.4 Birds ______________________________________________________________ 3-3 3.3.5 Marine ecosystems ___________________________________________________ 3-3 3.4 Socio-economic environment ___________________________________________3-4 3.4.1 Demographics and human development___________________________________ 3-4 3.4.2 In-migration _________________________________________________________ 3-4 3.4.3 Initiatives to promote economic development _______________________________ 3-5 Final Scoping Report – CSIR, April 2007 Page ii Proposed extension to the
    [Show full text]
  • Nelson Mandela Bay ULI Panel Report
    Port Elizabeth Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality South Africa November 1–6, 2015 Advisory ServicesReport Panel A ULI Port Elizabeth Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality South Africa Connectivity and Regeneration in the Baakens River Valley Precinct November 1–6, 2015 Advisory Services Panel Report A ULI A ULI About the Urban Land Institute THE MISSION OF THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE is ■■ Sustaining a diverse global network of local practice to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in and advisory efforts that address current and future creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. challenges. ULI is committed to Established in 1936, the Institute today has more than ■■ Bringing together leaders from across the fields of real 38,000 members worldwide, representing the entire spec- estate and land use policy to exchange best practices trum of the land use and development disciplines. Profes- and serve community needs; sionals represented include developers, builders, property owners, investors, architects, public officials, planners, ■■ Fostering collaboration within and beyond ULI’s real estate brokers, appraisers, attorneys, engineers, membership through mentoring, dialogue, and problem financiers, academics, students, and librarians. solving; ULI relies heavily on the experience of its members. It is ■■ Exploring issues of urbanization, conservation, regen- through member involvement and information resources eration, land use, capital formation, and sustainable that ULI has been able to set standards of excellence in development; development practice. The Institute has long been rec- ■■ Advancing land use policies and design practices that ognized as one of the world’s most respected and widely respect the uniqueness of both the built and natural quoted sources of objective information on urban planning, environments; growth, and development.
    [Show full text]
  • J.E.Afr.Nat.Hist.Soc. Vol.XXV No.3 (112) January 1966 CHECK LIST of ELOPOID and CLUPEOID FISHES in EAST AFRICAN COASTAL WATERS B
    J.E.Afr.Nat.Hist.Soc. Vol.XXV No.3 (112) January 1966 CHECK LIST OF ELOPOID AND CLUPEOID FISHES IN EAST AFRICAN COASTAL WATERS By G.F. LOOSE (East African Marine Fisheries Research Organization, Zanzibar.) Introduction During preliminary biological studies of the economically important fishes of the suborders Elopoidei and Clupeoidei in East African coastal waters, it was found that due to considerable confusion in the existing literature and the taxonomy of many genera, accurate identifi• cations were often difficult. A large collection of elopoid and clupeoid fishes has been made. Specimens have been obtained from purse-seine catches, by trawling in estuaries and shallow bays, by seining, handnetting under lamps at night, and from the catches of indigenous fishermen. A representative fartNaturalof thisHistory),collectionLondon,haswherenow beenI wasdepositedable to examinein the Britishfurther Museummaterial from the Western Indian Ocean during the summer of 1964. Based on these collections this check list has been prepared; a review on the taxonomy, fishery and existing biological knowledge of elopoid and clupeoid species in the East African area is in preparation. Twenty-one species, representing seven families are listed here; four not previously published distributional records are indicated by asterisks. Classification to familial level is based on Whitehead, P.J.P. (1963 a). Keys refer only to species listed and adult fishes. In the synonymy reference is made only to the original description and other subsequent records from the area. Only those localities are listed from which I have examined specimens. East Africa refers to the coastal waters of Kenya and Tanzania and the offshore islands of Pemba, Zanzibar and Mafia; Eastern Africa refers to the eastern side of the African continent, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeontological Impact Assessment: Desktop Study
    PALAEONTOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: DESKTOP STUDY Proposed construction of two filling stations adjacent to the N2, Zones 1 and 2 of the Coega IDZ, Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality, Eastern Cape Province John E. Almond PhD (Cantab.) Natura Viva cc, PO Box 12410 Mill Street, Cape Town 8010, RSA [email protected] April 2010 1. SUMMARY The two proposed filling station developments are located either side of the N2 in Zones 1 and 2 of the Coega IDZ, between St George’s Strand and Motherwell, Nelson Bay Municipality. Both development sites are underlain by limestone-rich shallow marine sediments of the Alexandria Formation (Algoa Group), with intermittent cover of pebbly residual weathering products (the so-called Bluewater Bay Formation). The Alexandria Formation has a high palaeontological sensitivity since it hosts a rich fossil marine biota of Miocene to Pliocene age that is dominated by molluscs and various other invertebrates, together with rare fish and (possibly) other vertebrate remains. Although much of the Alexandria Formation within the Coega IDZ has been altered by weathering and calcretization, seriously reducing its fossil content, the two filling station developments are situated close to an established fossil site (an abandoned limestone quarry) within this formation. Palaeontological mitigation is therefore recommended in both cases. Should thin sandstones and mudrocks of the Sundays River Formation beneath the Algoa Group limestone capping be exposed during deep excavations, these potentially fossil-rich sediments will also require palaeontological mitigation. Mitigation by a qualified palaeontologist should entail (a) the field examination of new excavations, (b) the recording of sedimentological and palaeontological data, (c) the judicious sampling of fossil material and (d) recommendations for any further action required to safeguard fossil heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrade of Main Road 435, Coega Industrial Development Zone, Eastern Cape
    UPGRADE OF MAIN ROAD 435, COEGA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONE, EASTERN CAPE FINAL SCOPING REPORT Prepared by Coastal & Environmental Services P.O. Box 934 Grahamstown 6140 For Coega Industrial Development Zone and Port Libra Chambers Oakworth Road Humerail Port Elizabeth 6001 C/O Ninham Shand/Manong & Associates Joint Venture 120 Villiers Road Walmer 6070 Port Elizabeth March 2005 Coastal & Environmental Services TABLE OF CONTENT SECTION 1: SCOPING REPORT ................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Brief project description ........................................................................................... 1 1.3 Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Project methodology ................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Scope of work .......................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Study team .............................................................................................................. 4 1.7 Structure of report ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Geological Survey/University of Cape Town MARINE GEOSCIENCE UNIT TECHNICAL ^REPORT NO. 13 PROGRESS REPORTS for the YEARS 1
    Joint Geological Survey/University of Cape Town MARINE GEOSCIENCE UNIT TECHNICAL ^REPORT NO. 13 PROGRESS REPORTS FOR THE YEARS 1981-1982 Marine Geoscience Group Department of Geology University of Cape Town December 1982 NGU-Tfc—Kh JOINT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY/UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN MARINE GEOSCIENCE UNIT TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 13 PROGRESS REPORTS FOR THE YEARS 1981-1982 Marine Geoscience Group Department of Geology University of Cape Town December 1982 The Joint Geological Survey/University of Cape Town Marine Geoscience Unit is jointly funded by the two parent organizations to promote marine geoscientific activity in South Africa. The Geological Survey Director, Mr L.N.J. Engelbrecht, and the University Research Committee are thanked for their continued generous financial and technical support for this work. The Unit was established in 1975 by the amalgamation of the Marine Geology Programme (funded by SANCOR until 1972) and the Marine Geophysical Unit. Financial ?nd technical assistance from the South African National Committee for Oceanographic Research, and the National Research Institute for Oceanology (Stellenbosch) are also gratefully acknowledged. It is the policy of the Geological Survey and the University of Cape Town that the data obtained may be presented in the form of theses for higher degrees and that completed projects shall be published without delay in appropriate media. The data and conclusions contained in this report are made available for the information of the international scientific community with tl~e request that they be not published in any manner without written permission. CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION by R.V.Dingle i PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE BATHYMETRY OF PART OF 1 THE TRANSKEI BASIN by S.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Msc Thesis
    THE ZOOGEOGRAPHY OF THE CETACEANS IN ALGOA BAY A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE of RHODES UNIVERSITY by BRIGITTE LEIGH MELLY January 2011 ABSTRACT The most recent study on cetaceans in Algoa Bay, South Africa, was conducted over 14 years ago. Consequently, knowledge of the cetacean species visiting this bay is currently based on incidental observations and stranding data. A number of developments in recent years: a deep- water port, proposed oil refinery, increased boating and fishing (commercial and recreational), a proposed Marine Protected Area, and the release of a whale-watching permit, all of which may impact these animals in some way, highlight the need for a baseline study on cetaceans. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the spatial and temporal distribution, and habitat preference of cetaceans in Algoa Bay. Boat-based surveys were conducted monthly between March 2009 and July 2010. At each sighting the GPS location, species, group size and composition, and behaviour were recorded. Using GIS, the sighting data was related to data layers of geographical variables such as sea surface temperature, depth and sea-floor substrate. Approximately 365 hours of search effort were completed over 57 surveys, with a total of 346 sightings. Species observed were: southern right whales (Eubalaena australis), humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae), Bryde’s whales (Balaenoptera brydei), Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus), Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis), and long- beaked common dolphins (Delphinus capensis). Southern right whales were observed during austral winter, utilising the shallow, protected areas of the bay as a mating and nursery ground.
    [Show full text]
  • To Marine Meteorological Services
    WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION Guide to Marine Meteorological Services Third edition PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS PUBLICATION IS GOING TO BE UPDATED BY END OF 2010. WMO-No. 471 Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization - Geneva - Switzerland 2001 © 2001, World Meteorological Organization ISBN 92-63-13471-5 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE FOR NOTING SUPPLEMENTS RECEIVED Supplement Dated Inserted in the publication No. by date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONTENTS Page FOREWORD................................................................................................................................................. ix INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER 1 — MARINE METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES ........................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Requirements for marine meteorological information....................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of the Family Callianassidae, with Keys to Subfamilies, Genera and Species, and the Description of New Taxa (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea)
    ZV-326 (pp 03-152) 02-01-2007 14:37 Pagina 3 Synopsis of the family Callianassidae, with keys to subfamilies, genera and species, and the description of new taxa (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea) K. Sakai Sakai, K. Synopsis of the family Callianassidae, with keys to subfamilies, genera and species, and the description of new taxa (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea). Zool. Verh. Leiden 326, 30.vii.1999: 1-152, figs 1-33.— ISSN 0024-1652/ISBN 90-73239-72-9. K. Sakai, Shikoku University, 771-1192 Tokushima, Japan, e-mail: [email protected]. Key words: Crustacea; Decapoda; Thalassinidae; Callianassidae; synopsis. A synopsis of the family Callianassidae is presented. Defenitions are given of the subfamilies and genera. Keys to the sufamilies, genera, as well as seperate keys to the species occurring in certain bio- geographical areas are provided. At least the synonymy, type-locality, and distribution of the species are listed. The following new taxa are described: Calliapaguropinae subfamily nov., Podocallichirus genus nov., Callianassa whitei spec. nov., Callianassa gruneri spec. nov., Callianassa ngochoae spec. nov., Neocallichirus kempi spec. nov. and Calliax doerjesti spec. nov. Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 Systematics .............................................................................................................................. 7 Subfamily Calliapaguropinae nov. .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]