Lowland Meadows Habitat Action Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lowland Meadows Habitat Action Plan Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Biodiversity Action Plan Lowland Meadows Habitat Action Plan Lowland Meadows Key associated species Adder’s- tongue Fern Marsh Fritillary Barn Owl Meadow Pipit Brown Hare Meadow Saxifrage Cowslip Moss Weissia squarrosa Curlew Narrow-leaved Water-dropwort Forester Moth Redshank Fritillary Short-eared Owl Green-winged Orchid Skylark Lapwing Snipe The vast majority of grassland currently present on farms in the UK is species- poor grassland which has been ‘improved’ through the application of fertiliser and/or ploughed and reseeded. Unimproved neutral grassland supporting a species-rich sward is now rare and subject to further threat as pressure increases to maintain or increase profitability. Lowland meadows are a priority habitat within the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. This plan also covers another UK Priority Habitat – Coastal & Floodplain Grazing Marshes. 1 Current status in the UK Biological status 1.1 There are currently less than 10,000 ha of unimproved neutral grassland remaining in England and less than 2,000 ha in Wales. These grasslands are managed mainly as traditional hay meadows or pastures. They contain a high proportion of broad-leaved herbaceous species such as Greater Burnet and Common Knapweed. As the habitat has been lost so these species have become rarer. 1.2 Semi-natural lowland grassland decreased in England and Wales by an estimated 97% between 1930 and 1984. Most neutral meadows now remain in a landscape of hedges and small woods, or in the distinctive upland areas characterised by the stone walls and moorland of northern England. 2 Current status in Buckinghamshire Cover and distribution 2.1 Unimproved, species-rich neutral grasslands are rare and threatened. The majority of neutral grasslands within Buckinghamshire are mainly located in the north, managed as traditional hay meadows or pastures. Neutral meadows are often characterised by ridge and furrow, and 1 Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Biodiversity Action Plan Lowland Meadows Habitat Action Plan combined with hedgerows and small woodlands form an intricate patchwork of habitats contributing to the biological diversity and richness of these areas. Those notified as SSSIs are often confined to small, isolated fields. There are, however, a number of non-statutory neutral and marshy grassland Wildlife Sites. The nationally important NVC type MG4 (Alopecurus pratensis-Sanguisorba officinalis flood meadow) is found at a number of sites in the Marsh Gibbon- Ludgershall area eg Long Herdon Meadow SSSI and in Milton Keynes at Oxley Mead SSSI. 2.2 The majority of lowland meadow Local Wildlife Sites are found north of the Chiltern Escarpment (164 ha, 86%) with just 25.5 ha within Chiltern, South Bucks and Wycombe Districts. 2.3 In the late 1990s surveys of neutral grasslands in North Buckinghamshire established their extent, distribution and quality. Only 37.9 ha of grassland and flush communities are regarded as exhibiting high conservation interest. This species-rich sward usually possesses a high proportion of wildflowers to grasses. Many of these fields are subject to seasonal flooding which attracts wintering and breeding waders and wildfowl. Management is generally through hay cropping and aftermath grazing. The area around Ludgershall-Marsh Gibbon exhibits outstanding interest with a large area of MG4 flood meadow grassland. Nationally rare, this area of interest fell within the Upper Thames Tributaries ESA. 2.4 Along the Thame valley near Notley Abbey and along the river between Eythrope and Lower Winchendon sites support some botanical interest. Sites at Bledlow tend to be small fields at the heart of the village, larger fields outside the settlement are arable or have been improved. 2.5 Stoke Hammond/Bragenham/ Soulbury is an area of note for the number of unimproved/semi-improved grasslands still in existence. Trends 2.6 Aerial photographic survey of Buckinghamshire revealed a loss of 95% of unimproved flower-rich meadows between 1947 and 1985. This mirrors the decline seen at a national level. 2.7 A number of birds associated with neutral grasslands are suffering a national decline. Amongst those included in the UK Steering Group list of species that breed in the County and rely on the typical grasslands of north Buckinghamshire are skylark, grey partridge and corn bunting. 2.8 Key negative species associated with deterioration in this type of habitat are coarse grasses such as tufted hair-grass and scrub species. 2 Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Biodiversity Action Plan Lowland Meadows Habitat Action Plan 2.9 For the MG4 grassland in the ESA area the presence of Greater Burnet and Saw-wort provide evidence of high conservation interest. 3 Current factors affecting the habitat Agricultural intensification 3.1 Losses have resulted through agricultural improvements and changes in management practice. These include ploughing and re-seeding, drainage of marshy grasslands, conversion to arable use. Addition of chemicals and fertilisers 3.2 There has been an increased use of slurry, fertilisers and herbicides. This leads to greater soil fertility with a subsequent decrease in floristic diversity. Change from traditional practices 3.3 There is a current preference for silage production rather than haymaking. Changes in the rural economy 3.4 Changes include financial pressures which lead to over-grazing, diversification, and increased horse grazing. Lack of perceived value 3.5 This can lead to neglect or to alternative land-use such as tree-planting and development. 4 Current Action Legal status 4.1 Some of Buckinghamshire’s neutral grasslands are protected as SSSIs. Additionally a number are designated as Wildlife Sites which confers some protection from development. 4.2 Neutral grasslands which are managed under ESA and Environmental Stewardship schemes have short-term protection from agricultural improvements. Management, research and guidance 4.3 Many of the important grasslands on the Upper Ray are in a Natural England Priority Area for the targeting of Environmental Stewardship, having previously been within the Upper Thames Tributaries ESA. The aim of both schemes in this area is the maintenance of the landscape and extensive management of the permanent grassland. Objectives include the raising of water levels in ditches and arable reversion to permanent and wet grassland. 3 Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Biodiversity Action Plan Lowland Meadows Habitat Action Plan 4.5 ‘North Buckinghamshire Grasslands - A Summary Report’ (Jennings 1997) provides a focus and strategy for the work of the funding organisations - Bucks County Council, Natural England and Aylesbury Vale District Council. The report identifies areas of botanical and bird interest and discusses future priorities. 4.6 Species-rich neutral grasslands have been identified as part of the Bucks Wildlife Sites Project. Sites that possess carefully selected criteria are eligible as Local Wildlife Sites, with the objective of targeting grant aid to assist in sympathetic management of the land. 5 Objectives 5.1 It is important that Habitat Action Plan objectives and actions are considered in conjunction with those in Generic Issues (see Generic Issues). All Generic objectives and actions apply to each individual Habitat Action Plan. 5.2 The Lowland Meadows HAP will contribute to the following UK BAP Targets - T1 Maintain the current extent of Lowland Meadows in the UK. (Target represents no loss of BAP habitat). T2 Maintain at least the current condition of Lowland Meadows. T3 Achieve favourable or recovering condition for 7,088ha of Lowland Meadow by 2010 T4 Restore 1,736 ha of Lowland Meadow from semi-improved or neglected grassland, which no longer meets the priority habitat definition by 2010 T5 Re-establish 345 ha of grassland of wildlife value from arable or improved grassland, by 2010. T6 260 ha (75%) of re-established area to be adjacent to existing Lowland Meadows or other semi-natural habitat by 2010. (Refer to T5) T7 170 ha (50%) of re-established area to contribute to resultant habitat patches of 2 ha or more of Lowland Meadow by 2010. (Refer to T5) And also the following targets in the Coastal & Flood Plain Grazing Marsh HAP T1 Maintain the extent of the existing resource of Coastal & Flood Plain Grazing Marsh habitat with no net loss. 4 Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Biodiversity Action Plan Lowland Meadows Habitat Action Plan T2 Maintain the condition of Coastal & Flood Plain Grazing Marsh habitat where already favourable and establish by 2010, management to secure favourable condition for all areas of grazing marsh currently judged as unfavourable. The target condition for all such areas should be favourable or unfavourable recovering by 2020. T3 Restore and improve 25,000 ha of relict habitat that does not qualify as Coastal & Flood Plain Grazing Marsh habitat by 2020. (e.g. dry Coastal & Flood Plain Grazing Marsh with inappropriate hydrological regime, agriculturally improved sites etc by implementing appropriate management at all sites). T4 Re-establish 3,200 ha of Coastal & Flood Plain Grazing Marsh of wildlife value from appropriate land sources (e.g. arable land) by 2020 (which is capable of supporting a diverse range of invertebrates, mammals and breeding waders). T5 Establish 8 new landscape scale wetland complexes by 2020, at least 1 in each country in which Coastal & Flood Plain Grazing Marsh is a major component along other wetland types. This cross- refers to targets in the uplands, lowland raised bog, wet woodlands, fens and
Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity and Planning in Buckinghamshire
    Biodiversity and Planning in Buckinghamshire Version 2. March 2014 Contents Section 1 1a About this guidance ......................................................................................................................3 WHO IS THIS Protecting and enhancing Buckinghamshire’s biodiversity ...............................3 How to use this guidance ................................................................................................3 GUIDANCE FOR? 1b Biodiversity in the planning process .......................................................................................4 This guidance should be helpful if 1c Information requirements ...........................................................................................................5 you are: Section 2 n a planning officer in either 2a Internationally and nationally designated sites ..................................................................6 policy or development 2b Legally protected species ............................................................................................................8 management; Section 3 n writing a Neighbourhood Plan; 3 Local sites and priority habitats and species ........................................................................11 3a Local Sites ..........................................................................................................................................12 n going to be submitting a 3b Irreplaceable Habitats ...................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire
    Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Version Date Authors Notes 4.0 January 2009 MHa, MCH, PB, MD, AMcV Edits and updates from wider consultation group 5.0 May 2009 MHa, MCH, PB, MD, AMcV, GDB, RM Additional edits and corrections 6.0 November 2009 Mha, GH, AF, GDB, RM Additional edits and corrections This document was prepared by Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes Environmental Records Centre (BMERC) and Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and commissioned by the Oxfordshire and Berkshire Local Authorities and by Buckinghamshire County Council Contents 1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................4 2.0 Selection Criteria for Local Wildlife Sites .....................................................6 3.0 Where does a Local Wildlife Site start and finish? Drawing the line............. 17 4.0 UKBAP Habitat descriptions ………………………………………………………………….19 4.1 Lowland Calcareous Grassland………………………………………………………… 20 4.2 Lowland Dry Acid Grassland................................................................ 23 4.3 Lowland Meadows.............................................................................. 26 4.4 Lowland heathland............................................................................. 29 4.5 Eutrophic Standing Water ................................................................... 32 4.6. Mesotrophic Lakes ............................................................................ 35 4.7
    [Show full text]
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.
    [Show full text]
  • Bucks-List-All-Species.Pdf
    Buckinghamshire Bird List Updated in Jul 2020 with 2017 records. 2018 records are available in the Buckinghamshire Bird Club Annual Report. Updated Chart data Feb 2019 Red : Sightings Records Pink : Rare Breeding Records Purple : “Probables” Green : Probable Escapees Navy Blue : Records yet to be Considered by the Bucks Records Committee 1. Red-throated Diver Gavia stellata Rare vagrant. 19 records. View historical photos (for more recent photos see Gallery of members photos) Prior 1910 near Aylesbury Station – shot and presented to County Museum. 1952 Little Marlow GPs – Adult from 27th Oct to 7th Nov. 1970 Hurley – 1 on the River Thames from 11th-31st Mar. 1971 Stanton Low GP – A diver Sp from 25th Feb to 8th Mar was considered to be of this species. 1976 Calvert – 1 from 13th-16th Feb and 22nd Feb. 1978 Hurley – A diver Sp on the River Thames on 19th Feb was considered to be of this species. 1978 Wotton Lakes – 1 from 5th-12th Mar. 1979 Willen – 1 on 14th Mar. 1980 Willen – 1 from 7th-10th Oct 1986 Willen – 1 on 7th Feb. 1987 Weston Turville Res. – A slightly oiled adult from 8th-10th Dec was taken into care but later died. 1988 Calvert – A diver Sp on 17th Nov was considered to be of this species. 1989 Willen – 14 on 2nd Apr, with 6 present just after dawn on on 3rd and 2 remaining until 09:00. This influx may have been caused by snow on the E coast. 1990 Little Marlow GP – Juvenile 16th Dec until 12th Jan 1991. 1994 Stowe School – 1 on 20th Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    The Parks Trust Biodiversity Action Plan 2017-2022 1 Contents INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................3 WHAT IS BIODIVERSITY? ........................................................................................................................... 3 ECOSYSTEM SERVICES .............................................................................................................................. 3 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT............................................................................................................................4 EVENTS.................................................................................................................................................. 4 VOLUNTEERS .......................................................................................................................................... 4 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ................................................................................................................... 5 SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................................. 5 ADULT EDUCATION .................................................................................................................................. 6 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY CENTRES ............................................................................................................. 6 LANDSCAPE
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Environment
    NATURAL ENVIRONMENT NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Background 6.1 In terms of landscape character, English Nature identifies most of the Borough as part of a wider “Natural Area” known as the West Anglian Plain, which The Character of also includes the clay vales of Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire. England: landscape, To the south, the Brickhills form part of the Bedfordshire Greensand Ridge while wildlife and natural higher ground on the northern edge of the Borough falls within the Yardley - features. Whittlewood Ridge. The Borough also covers a large part of the upper stretches of (Countryside the River Great Ouse catchment area. Commission and English Nature, 6.2 The Borough includes extensive areas of countryside, typically villages set in 1997) See also English a mix of arable fields and pasture on fairly fertile chalky clay soils. Apart from some Nature’s Natural woodland remaining as green islands, the wetland habitats provided by the River Area Profiles Ouse and its tributaries and floodplains, the wildlife habitats have become degraded as a result of intensive farming. Hence the importance of protecting and enhancing what remains, including by wildlife friendly management of farms. 6.3 During the development of the City, new habitats have been created and enhanced, such as Linear Parks and grid road corridors. Some of the best habitats have been protected but others have been lost. New habitats such as the balancing lakes have greatly enhanced the variety of birdlife and possibly other wildlife but further help from positive planning measures is still required to save and enhance what remains, National, Regional and Local Objectives 6.4 A key tool is the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • En Report (Scie) F&B
    Report Number 520 Thames & Chilterns: Parkland and wood pastures with veteran trees Phase I - A Provisional Inventory 2002/3 English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 520 Thames & Chilterns: Parkland and wood pastures with veteran trees Phase I – A provisional inventory 2002/03 Keith N A Alexander and Janet A Lister You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2003 Summary This document reports on the first phase of an assessment of the veteran tree resource of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, and is a contribution to the Wood Pasture and Parkland habitat action plan of the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. A desk study has drawn on information derived from OS map sheets, historical and biological data sources, and from professionals with local knowledge, to identify wood-pasture and parkland habitats of importance, or potential importance, for veteran trees. The aim of the study was to provide baseline information that can be used to develop a prioritised programme of site survey and assessment, to identify the extent of the veteran tree interest of the three counties, in terms of biological interests, and to promote their conservation. The results demonstrate the current poor knowledge of the veteran tree resource in the three counties. Out of a total of 423 sites identified with actual or potential interest for veteran trees, 155 (37%) could only be identified as having possible interest, and a further 26 (6%) as of probable interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Conservation Upper Thames Branch Butterfly Sightings Archive - January to December 2013
    Butterfly Conservation Upper Thames Branch Butterfly Sightings Archive - January to December 2013 ~ Monday 30th December 2013 ~ The following sighting from Brian Clews came via David Fuller on 28th December: "Can't recall if I told you of a Red Admiral in my garden on December 4th but we also just had a gorgeous Comma sunning itself on a roof in Whyteladyes lane, Cookham Rise, Berks (SU897850) – 12.30pm." ~ Friday 27th December 2013 ~ Peter Law sent this news today: "27th December, 1:30pm: I have just found an active Small Tortoiseshell inside my park home at Garsington, Oxon. I didn't realise that I had a hibernator on the premises, but clearly I have." ~ Thursday 19th December 2013 ~ This news came from Derek Wilkins on 19th December: "On Sunday 8th December 1pm a Red Admiral was seen flying swiftly above the heads of Christmas shoppers in Peascod Street, Windsor, Berks before settling to bask on a sunny wall opposite the Post Office - a welcome sight on a pleasant winters day! Not quite my latest ever sighting of a Red Admiral, that was 10th December 2005 again close to Windsor town centre." Robert Bowers sent this sighting: "I dropped my wife off at Stoke Mandeville Hospital (Bucks) today at 12:50 (Thursday 19th December) and saw a Red Admiral on the wall at the main entrance. It was in very good condition, and looked as though it may well have hatched very recently. As this must be quite unusual, I thought I would let you know." Michael Swaine reported the following on 17th December: "A real winter surprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Infrastructure Delivery Plan
    Milton Keynes Local Transport Plan 4: Transport Infrastructure Delivery Plan Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report (updated following consultation) Milton Keynes Council October 2019 SEA for the Milton Keynes Transport Environmental Report Infrastructure Delivery Plan Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Ryan Putt Nick Chisholm-Batten Steve Smith Environmental Associate Director Technical Director Consultant Nick Chisholm-Batten Associate Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position V2.0 31st May 2019 Consultation 31st May 2019 Nick Chisholm- Associate version Batten Director V3.0 15th October Updated version 15th October Nick Chisholm- Associate 2019 following 2019 Batten Director consultation Prepared for: Milton Keynes Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol, BS1 6NA United Kingdom T: 0117 901 7000 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement
    [Show full text]
  • Local Wildlife Sites Selection Criteria V7 Contents
    LOCAL WILDLIFE SITES SELECTION CRITERIA BERKSHIRE, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE AND Version 7 OXFORDSHIRE This document was prepared by Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Environmental Records Centre (BMERC) and commissioned by Oxfordshire and Berkshire Local Authorities and by Buckinghamshire County Council. Page | 1 Local Wildlife Sites selection criteria v7 Contents 1.0| INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 9 1.1| WHAT IS A LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE? ................................................................................................. 9 1.2| LEGISLATION AND POLICY BACKGROUND ....................................................................................... 10 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND RURAL COMMUNITIES ACT 2004 (NERC ACT) .................................................... 10 NATIONAL PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK 2012 (NPPF) ............................................................................... 10 BIODIVERSITY 2020: A STRATEGY FOR ENGLAND’S WILDLIFE AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ........................................ 11 ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS ............................................................................................................................. 11 LOCAL AUTHORITY PLANS AND POLICIES ........................................................................................................ 12 1.3| LWS SYSTEM IN BERKS, BUCKS AND OXON ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Building Stone Atlas of Buckinghamshire (Including Milton Keynes)
    Strategic Stone Study A Building Stone Atlas of Buckinghamshire (including Milton Keynes) Published August 2018 Contents Danesfield House (Page 11) Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Buckinghamshire Bedrock Geology Map ........................................................................................................ 2 Buckinghamshire Superficial Geology Map .................................................................................................... 3 Stratigraphic Table ........................................................................................................................................... 4 The use of stone in Buckinghamshire’s buildings ..................................................................................... 5-20 Background and historical context ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5 The Yardley to Wittlewood Ridge .............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 The Vale of Aylesbury .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 The Midvale Ridge .......................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Place-Names of the Whittlewood Area. Phd Thesis, University of Nottingham
    Forward, Eleanor J. (2008) Place-names of the Whittlewood area. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Access from the University of Nottingham repository: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10568/1/Thesis_EF.pdf Copyright and reuse: The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions. · Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. · To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in Nottingham ePrints has been checked for eligibility before being made available. · Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not- for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. · Quotations or similar reproductions must be sufficiently acknowledged. Please see our full end user licence at: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf A note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information, please contact [email protected] Place-names of the Whittlewood area Eleanor J. Forward, BA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2007 To my Grandparents Abstract The recent work of D.
    [Show full text]