DOCSLIB.ORG

Milton Keynes Council Local Flood Risk Management Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Milton Keynes Council Local Flood Risk Management Strategy ANNEX B Water Submitted to: Submitted by : Milton Keynes Council, AECOM, Civic Offices, Scott House, 1 Saxon Gate East, Alençon Link, Central Milton Keynes, Basingstoke, MK9 3EJ. Hampshire, RG21 7PP. Telephone: +44(0)1256 310 200 Fax: +44(0)1256 310 201 Milton Keynes Council Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report AECOM Milton Keynes Council LFRMS SEA Environmental Report Prepared by: Penelope Pickerin Checked by: Simon Keys Graduate Consultant EIA Project Manager Approved by: Jon Robinson Operations Director – Water Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 0 Draft Report for Comment Simon Keys Jon 15.04.2015 Robinson AECOM, Scott House, Alençon Link, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7PP, United Kingdom. Telephone: 01256 310 200 Website: http://www.aecom.com 47072190 Milton Keynes LFRMS AECOM Milton Keynes Council LFRMS SEA Environmental Report Limitations AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the Milton Keynes Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed [47072190 November 2014 ]. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by AECOM has not been independently verified by AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by AECOM in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between November 2014 and April 2015 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. AECOM disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to AECOM’s attention after the date of the Report. Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward- looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward- looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. AECOM specifically does not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report. Unless otherwise stated in this Report, the assessments made assume that the sites and facilities will continue to be used for their current purpose without significant changes. Copyright © This Report is the copyright of AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. AECOM Milton Keynes Council LFRMS SEA Environmental Report Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................ i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................. ES-1 Background ............................................................................................................................................................................ ES-1 Strategic Environmental Assessment ..................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Milton Keynes LFRMS ............................................................................................................................................................ ES-2 Assessment Results ............................................................................................................................................................... ES-2 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Strategic Environmental Assessment ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Structure of the Environmental Report ......................................................................................................................... 1-1 2 Consultation ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Development from the Scoping Report ........................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Dealing with Uncertainties ............................................................................................................................................ 2-1 3 Strategic Environmental Assessment ............................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 The Purpose of Strategic Environmental Assessment ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Stages in the SEA Process .......................................................................................................................................... 3-1 4 The Milton Keynes Council’s LFRMS ................................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Technical Scope of a LFRMS ....................................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.3 Relationship between the SEA and LFRMS ................................................................................................................. 4-6 4.4 Relationships with other Flood and Water Management Plans .................................................................................... 4-6 4.5 Aims, Objectives and Measures ................................................................................................................................... 4-9 4.6 Draft Strategy Objectives and Measures ...................................................................................................................... 4-9 5 Sustainability ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Review of Relevant Plans, Programmes and Strategies .............................................................................................. 5-1 5.3 Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment .......................................................................................................... 5-2 5.4 Identification of Key Themes ........................................................................................................................................ 5-2 6 SEA Baseline Information .................................................................................................................................................. 6-1 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Summary of Flood Risk in Milton Keynes ..................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.3 Surface Water (Pluvial) Flooding .................................................................................................................................. 6-4 6.4 Groundwater Flooding .................................................................................................................................................. 6-6 6.5 Flooding from Ordinary Watercourses .......................................................................................................................... 6-8 6.6 Main River (Fluvial) Flooding ........................................................................................................................................ 6-8 6.7 Sewer Flooding .........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Superior Regulation
    L AKE S UPERIOR R EGULATION LAKE SUPERIOR REGULATION: : A ADDRESSING UNCERTAINTY IN UPPER DDRESSING GREAT LAKES WATER LEVELS U NCERTAINTY IN U PPER G REAT L AKES W ATER L EVELS FINAL REPORT TO THE INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION MARCH 2012 Report Cover Changing water levels can have significant effects on the lives of the more than 25 million people who live and work in the upper Great Lakes region. The front cover shows an integrated view of the key interests served by these waters. In the centre of the image is a photograph of the control structures at the outlet of Lake Superior on the St. Marys River, the only location in the entire Great Lakes basin upstream from Niagara Falls where water levels can be affected by regulation. Under the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909, domestic and sanitary water uses, navigation, and power and irrigation are given order of precedence. These uses must be taken into account in the development of regulation plans. Today, it is recognized that other interests have rights under the Treaty, consistent with the International Joint Commission’s balancing principle – providing benefits or relief to interests affected by water levels and flows without causing undue detriment to other interests. With this in mind, the International Upper Great Lakes Study added the interests of ecosystems, coastal zone uses and recreational boating and tourism to its analysis of Lake Superior regulation and uncertainty in future upper Great Lakes water levels. In addition, the Study recognized that First Nations in Canada, Native Americans and Métis represent an important perspective in the upper Great Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Zander Are Now in the Tove!
    Chronicle & Echo - Northamptonshire weekly paper - angling column as supplied for Thursday February 11, 2016 (version printed in newspaper may differ) Predator angler targets alien species – and proves that... Zander are now in the Tove! ANDER – love 'em or hate 'em the ● RINGER Pairs, Boddington: Karl Conley 113lb, Neil Zsupremely invasive alien predator can Russell 112lb, Glen Maxwell 110lb. Russell and Chris Hill spread faster than office gossip. were top pair. ● And now they have reached the River Tove – just above CASTLE Ashby open, Grendon Lake, Sunday: Chris where the tiny river empties into the Ouse at Cosgrove! Garrett 112-4, Steve Shakespeare 93lb, Phil Wintle 61-12. ● WHITE Hart Flore, Barby Banks: Getting in before the floods (a 'Griffiths family benefit') Trevor started, Castlethorpe's 91lb, Mark 58lb, Dave 51lb. Trevor Ray set out to confirm ■ A WINNER his belief that Zs were in the on the Nene: ● FLORE & Brockhall, Silver Lake: river – washed through from Danny Rob 'three-wins-in-a-row-now' the canal at Stoke – by Harding had Rawlins 9-8 of roach, Bert Isle 8- 33-10 in an targeting them with pieces of 12, Steve Smith 3-8. open at Islip. roach, two miles from the ● NENE, long pound, Stoke: Bob Photo Chris Eales 9-6, Brian Beard 8-10, Andy cut. Morehen "I caught one at the first Kimpton and George Mynard both attempt (around 10 ounces) it 4-9. was obvious they would end ● TOWCESTER Vets, Stow Hill cut: up in the river eventually," Bob Eales 3lb, Tosh Saunders 1- said the man who, a week 15, George Mynard 1-7.
    [Show full text]
  • Béng Salang Drainage Basin Ghn'öm#Iaötii:;^Iiïmbóclia:;S:*' ;;; Sawa
    |||«|iBi-««ss«,,,,.,„ •<îouueirânià"fYon*afrtWi&WP*»**"«**»s «"••••-•-•••-!\i-olhörlanHc:ïnÏT^SAïyiilfÏftft M#**iiiii l ; 1 f s December11990 liiiilis OttWWIayts l''*t**. iMvr'fc^^sW«*i s ' '^*" "*'*'***™*** "yK'!.TiS'syW%sii!^^ii^ïl m •** ••,.. •.. "'. '""" '!IS ' h '' * *W*i*»*hWer8rrt«3(a^OeweJopmênt ' ' J|'* jj^jj^ ^f T^fOJD ê ratiïMT * * • * * * • < ; s is 111 41 II 622 KHPH90 * Mi M SM | i iitl Hi • j* UNI», S ' • !•) f J 'Itlli,. iNiiiiii 'MM! ill ( tuti s t illililiiilllllllll^^^ ••IIIINI 4 !i'» < :*iH:1::iN|M|()||:ï::|:::-:i::::..: :|!:;| lilli • < iBiitiiiiit lllllNilHIilltii: MîMM MMI ! M f ! H t II ÜÏ >**ii;ii|i!i|ï «IliliiNliiiiii •I ••••: Jill!:!*::::. Béng Salang Drainage Basin : ' i * * i hllil ghn'öm#iaötii:;^iiïmbóclia:;s:*' ;;; r, i I • Consultancy Group for Utrecht, The Netherlands sawa Watersupply, Sanitation, Agriculture and Waterrnanagement International Institute for Delft, The Netherlands Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering DELFT LIBRARY ïERMATiONAL RFFERENCE CENT -•? COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY ••i'M-ilTATIQN (IRC1 December 1990 Municipality of Phnom-Penh NOVIB Sewerage Department Drainage Study of Beng Salang Drainage Basin Phnom-Penh, Cambodia LIBRARY, INTERNATIONAL REFERENCE CENTRE FOR COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY •v^iD SANITATION (IRC) . ). Box 93190, 2509 AD The Hagu» u;l. 1070) 814911 ext 141(142 International Institute for Consultancy Group for Hydraulic and Environmental Watersupply, Sanitation, Agriculture Engineering and Watermanagement P.O. Box 3015 Schoolplein 7 2601 DA Delft 3581 PX Utrecht The Netherlands
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 2013 Appendix B5
    ID³ Location1 Watercourse and Cause2 Dates Source Comments Staffordshire Past-Track 1 Near Uttoxeter River Dove Oct-03 Photos showing waterlogged fields http://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/ Picknall brook Staffordshire Past-Track 3ft/1m depth 2 Hockley Road 1946 Cause i? http://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/ Photo included Picknall brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 3 Hockley Road 2000 81.34m AOD Cause i? Jun-06 Picknall brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 4 Downstream of Hockley Road 2000 81.20m AOD Cause i? Jun-06 Picknall brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 5 Bridge Street/Brookside Road 2000 77.67m AOD Cause i? Jun-06 Picknall brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 6 Station Road Brookside Road 2000 77.72m AOD Cause i? Jun-06 Picknall Brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 7 Hockley Road Oct/Nov 2000 5 properties flooded. Cause i? Jun-06 8 Picknall Brook Flood Warning given (8a-8b) Stafford Road to Racecourse Cause i? Dec-03 Environment Agency ‘Provision of Flood Warnings’ Report to Defra April 2005 Floodplain flooded only Staffordshire Past-Track 9 Dove Bank Snow thaw so possibly Cause iv? 1946 Photo included http://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/ BBC Nottingham News 10 Railway line Cause iv? Nov-00 Railway line closed Stoke on Trent to Derby line http://www.bbc.co.uk/nottingham/news/2000_11/09/floods_traveldetails.shtml (Feeder brook to Picknall) Big flood problem just after the three tributaries join as the culvert is not big enough to cope 11 Foxglove Avenue Area Regular Emma Roberts (Council) Cause iii and cause i with the runoff from hills plus the new development (housing estate) (Feeder brook to Picknall Brook) 12 Kingfisher Way Winter 2006/7 and a few before Emma Roberts (Council) Problems with the capacity of the culvert Cause i and cause iii Very small section 13 Between Park Street and The Dove Way Cause iii ? Emma Roberts (Council) of culvert neglected by the EA.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 8 Page.Pub
    Raymond Waterways Newsletter Published by Raymond Waterways Protective Association “To protect and improve pond and lake water quality and foster watershed stewardship” June 2004 Dear Friends of Raymond Waterways; Inside this Issue: After experiencing a “non-winter” with cerned about and this one is very close to Milfoil Update 2 hardly any snow, we anxiously await a nor- us. Little Sebago Lake has a close relative mal summer, replete with warm tempera- of variable milfoil called Myrophyllum RWPA Structure 3 tures and sunny days. pinnatum. We know that this new (to us) Lake Associations 3 plant does not have flowers like variable First, a change of date... Thomas Pond 4 You may be a bit surprised by the early milfoil, making it even more difficult to Conservation Project arrival of this publication. We surmised identify! that most people’s interest in lake activities The first line of defense, our staff... Panther Pond 4 is greater in early summer rather than late We have been fortunate to acquire the ser- Watershed Survey in the season and it gives us a chance to let vices of Noralee Raymond as Executive Crescent & Raymond 5 you know about upcoming trainings and Director. She is in charge of education, Project Completed events, hence the change. Hope you agree. overall coordination, and is the person to Free Technical 5 And, what’s on our mind is... contact for all communications. She will Assistance Of course the milfoil situation. While it is be active in running both the Milfoil 2003 Water Quality 6 very true that Raymond is surrounded by Ranger Program and the Watershed Stew- Monitoring Results infected lakes (North-Parker Pond, East- ards Program.
    [Show full text]
  • MK Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development
    October 2016 Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development in the Borough of Milton Keynes and Adjoining Areas FINAL Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development in the Borough of Milton Keynes and Adjoining Areas 1 St John’s Square Final Report London, EC1M 4DH T: +44 (0)207 253 2929 Prepared by Gillespies LLP F: +44 (0)207 253 3900 October 2016 www.gillespies.co.uk Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Methodology 5 3 Identification of Development Model and Landscape Attributes 8 4 Susceptibility Criteria 8 5 Assessment of Landscape Sensitivity to Residential Development 10 6 Landscape Assessments 11 INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction 1.1.1 Milton Keynes Council (MKC) is currently developing 1.1.3 The main aims of this study are; a new Local Plan. Planning to meet housing need will be a key part of Plan:MK. This is to comply with the requirement in the To assess the sensitivity of the 30 landscape areas around National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (Paragraph 14) that Milton Keynes, Newport Pagnell, Woburn Sands and Olney to residential development Local Plans should met objectively-assessed needs unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably To identify where particular land areas may have greater or outweigh the benefits, or that specific policies in the NPPF indicate less capacity for residential development that development should be restricted. In assessing potential site options, the NPPF states that ‘allocations of land for development should prefer land of less environmental value’ (Paragraph 17). The Local Plan should bring forward allocations which are consistent with these various requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Land Allocation Development Framework
    Urban Design & Landscape Architecture Strategic Land Allocation Development Framework Supplementary Planning Document www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/urban-design DRAFT July 2012 This document has been prepared by Milton Keynes Council’s Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Team. For further information please contact: Neil Sainsbury Head of Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Planning, Economy and Development Group Milton Keynes Council Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East Milton Keynes MK9 3EJ T +44 (0) 1908 252708 F +44 (0) 1908 252329 E [email protected] 2 Contents SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION SECTION 3 DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK SECTION 5 NEXT STEPS 1.1 Introduction 7 3.1 Introduction 31 5.1 Outline Application 57 1.2 Role of Development Framework 7 3.2 The Vision 31 5.2 Design and Access Statements 57 1.3 Community Engagement 8 3.3 Core Concept 32 5.3 Design Codes 57 1.4 Status of Development Framework 8 3.4 Landscape and Open Space Strategy 33 5.4 Reserved Matters Applications 57 1.5 Planning Policy Background 9 3.5 Movement Framework 37 5.5 Programme and milestones 57 3.6 Land Uses 43 3.7 Character 46 APPENDICES SECTION 2 THE SITE AND ITS CONTEXT 3.8 Sustainability 48 3.9 Indicative Development Framework Plan 50 A Planning Policy Context 59 2.1 Introduction 13 3.10 Indicative Land Use Budget 51 A1 Core Strategy 59 2.2 Strategic Land Allocation 13 A2 Local Plan 61 SECTION 4 PHASING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY 2.2 Surrounding Area and Edge Conditions 15 B Open space Requirements 65 2.3 Topography, Views and Drainage 17 C Indicative
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT INCLUDING PARKING ASSESSMENT CIVIC ENGINEERS December 2020
    TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT INCLUDING PARKING ASSESSMENT CIVIC ENGINEERS December 2020 1 Civic Engineers Job Title Prepared for Love Wolverton Love Wolverton Report Type Date Transport Assessment including Parking Assessment ISSUE v09 10 December 2020 Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Commission .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Development Description ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Development Proposals and Vision ......................................................................................................................... 4 Report Content ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Planning History ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2. Existing Site and Transport Context .................................................................................................................. 6 Site Location .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Watermeadows Management Plan 2017-32 Acknowledgements
    Watermeadows Management Plan 2017-32 Acknowledgements Watermeadows Management Plan 2017-32 The Watermeadows Landscape Management Plan has been written and compiled by Red Kite Network Limited on behalf of Cherwell District Council and South Northamptonshire District Council. Staff from the District Council and the local community have also contributed to the development of the Plan. Red Kite would like to acknowledge the support and assistance from the following people and organisations: Councillor Roger Clarke, South Northamptonshire Council Paul Almond, Street Scene and Landscape Manager at Cherwell District and South Northamptonshire Councils Brian Collins, Landscape Officer at Cherwell District and South Northamptonshire Councils Towcester Town Council Alex Rothwell, Paul Wilkanowski and Helen Chapman from the Environment Agency Towcester Wildlife Trust Group Dr James Littlemore, Senior Lecturer, and Students of Moulton College Further information about the Plan is available from: South Northamptonshire Council The Forum, Moat Lane, Towcester, Northants, NN12 6AD Tel: 01327 322 322 Acknowledgements | 2 Contents Technical overview 3.0 Where do we want to go? Executive summary 3.1 Introduction 19 1.0 Introduction, Context and Background 3.2 SWOT analysis 19 1.1 Statement of Significance 6 3.3 Evaluation 22 1.2 Background to Plan 6 3.4 The Future 23 1.3 Format of Plan 6 3.5 Intervention Areas 25 1.4 Purpose of Plan 7 3.6 Zones and Trails 26 1.5 Development of Plan 7 4.0 How are we going to get there? 1.6 Stakeholder Invovlement and Target
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Planning in Buckinghamshire
    Biodiversity and Planning in Buckinghamshire Version 2. March 2014 Contents Section 1 1a About this guidance ......................................................................................................................3 WHO IS THIS Protecting and enhancing Buckinghamshire’s biodiversity ...............................3 How to use this guidance ................................................................................................3 GUIDANCE FOR? 1b Biodiversity in the planning process .......................................................................................4 This guidance should be helpful if 1c Information requirements ...........................................................................................................5 you are: Section 2 n a planning officer in either 2a Internationally and nationally designated sites ..................................................................6 policy or development 2b Legally protected species ............................................................................................................8 management; Section 3 n writing a Neighbourhood Plan; 3 Local sites and priority habitats and species ........................................................................11 3a Local Sites ..........................................................................................................................................12 n going to be submitting a 3b Irreplaceable Habitats ...................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Official Guide and Map
    TOWCESTER Official Guide and Map Delivered by Royal Mail to residents and businesses in Towcester. Also available from Town Council offices and to view online at www.towcester-tc.gov.uk Please tell the advertiser you saw them in the Towcester Official Guide and Map Award winning salon ‘Creative Salon Award’ Award winning stylists Salon and stylists state registered - National Federation of Hairdressing AWARD LOOKING YOU! Please visit our website for current offers and discounts or contact one of our friendly staff on: 01327 353143 [email protected] || www.flamehairstudios.co.uk Unit 4 - 6 Shire Court, 25 Richmond Road, Towcester, NN12 6EX 1 Please tell the advertiser you saw them in the Towcester Official Guide and Map TOWCESTER Official Guide and Map Issued by the authority of Towcester Town Council www.towcester-tc.gov.uk © Designed and Published by Local Authority Publishing Co. Ltd. www.localauthoritypublishing.co.uk View the online version at www.officialguides.co.uk Newman & Reidy Isuzu, the leading independent used car & van sales and service centre, in the South Northants and Milton Keynes areas. Established over 20 years. We have been selling New and Used vehicles since 2000 and over the years supplied in excess of 6,000 cars and vans all over the UK. Our service and reputation is outstanding, with many customers returning again and again for repairs, MOT’s and vehicle purchases. We look forward to being of service to the local community for many years to come, please feel free to come and put us to the test. The Name
    [Show full text]
  • 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]