DOCSLIB.ORG

Milton Keynes Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (April 2015)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Milton Keynes Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (April 2015) Milton Keynes Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report April 2015 47070452 UNITED KINGDOM & IRELAND Prepared for: Milton Keynes Council — Level 1 SFRA Update REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 September Draft for Comment Sarah Littlewood Elizabeth Gent Elizabeth Gent 2014 Consultant Principal Consultant Principal Consultant Richard Karooni Consultant Ewan McCracken Consultant 2 April 2015 Final Report Sarah Littlewood Helen Judd Jon Robinson (incorporating Consultant Senior Consultant Operations Director - comments from Water MKC, the Joanna Bolding Environment Consultant Agency and Bedford Group of Gemma Hoad Drainage Boards) Senior Consultant URS Infrastructure and Environment UK Ltd 6-8 Greencoat Place London SW1P 1PL United Kingdom Telephone: +44(0)20 7798 5000 Fax: +44(0)20 7798 5001 LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT 47070452 April 2015 i Milton Keynes Council — Level 1 SFRA Update Limitations URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“URS”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Milton Keynes Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed (URS Quotation of Services ‘Milton Keynes SFRA Level 1 Update - Quotation of Services.pdf). No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between May 2014 and April 2015 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. URS disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to URS’ attention after the date of the Report. Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward- looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward-looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. URS specifically does not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report. Copyright © This Report is the copyright of URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT 47070452 April 2015 ii Milton Keynes Council — Level 1 SFRA Update TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ................................ ................................ ................ V GLOSSARY OF TERMS .................................................................... VII 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 1 1.1 Terms of Reference ......................................................... 1 1.2 Project Aims ..................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Deliverables......................................................... 3 1.4 Partner Organisations ..................................................... 3 1.5 Milton Keynes Study Area .............................................. 4 2 LEGISLATIVE AND PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT ...... 7 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................... 7 2.2 Flood and Water Management Act ................................. 7 2.3 Flood Risk Regulations ................................................... 8 2.4 Anglian River Basin District draft Flood Risk Management Plan ............................................................ 8 2.5 National Planning Policy Framework............................. 9 2.6 Local Planning Policy ...................................................... 9 2.7 IDB Policy ....................................................................... 10 3 STUDY METHODOLOGY ............................................... 13 3.1 Level 1 SFRA Methodology .......................................... 13 3.2 Need for a Level 2 SFRA ............................................... 14 4 FLOOD RISK IN MILTON KEYNES ............................... 15 4.1 Introduction .................................................................... 15 4.2 Flooding from Rivers ..................................................... 15 4.3 Flooding from Surface Water ....................................... 23 4.4 Flooding from Groundwater ......................................... 25 4.5 Flooding from Sewers ................................................... 29 4.6 Flooding from Reservoirs, Canals and Other Artificial Sources ........................................................................... 29 4.7 Flood Risk Management Measures .............................. 31 5 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................ 41 5.1 Policy Considerations ................................................... 41 5.2 Council Specific Policy Issues ..................................... 43 5.3 Sensitive Development Locations ............................... 43 6 GUIDANCE FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE SEQUENTIAL TEST ........................................................ 45 6.1 Sequential Approach ..................................................... 45 6.2 Applying the Sequential Test – Plan-Making .............. 45 LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT 47070452 April 2015 iii Milton Keynes Council — Level 1 SFRA Update 6.3 Applying the Sequential Test – Planning Applications 48 6.4 Exception Test ............................................................... 50 7 GUIDANCE FOR SITE SPECIFIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENTS .............................................................. 53 7.1 When is a Flood Risk Assessment required? ............. 53 7.2 What should a Flood Risk Assessment address? ..... 53 7.3 Guidance on Flood Risk Management Measures ....... 57 8 GUIDANCE FOR THE APPLICATION OF SUDS .......... 64 8.1 Introduction .................................................................... 64 8.2 Use of Infiltration SuDS in Milton Keynes ................... 69 8.3 National SuDS Standards ............................................. 71 9 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................... 72 9.1 Site Allocation Process ................................................. 72 9.2 Council Policy ................................................................ 72 9.3 Future Updates to the SFRA ......................................... 72 9.4 Level 2 SFRA .................................................................. 73 APPENDIX A DATA REGISTER ....................................................... 74 APPENDIX B STUDY AREA MAPPING ........................................... 78 APPENDIX C FLUVIAL FLOOD ZONE MAPPING........................... 80 APPENDIX D SURFACE WATER FLOOD RISK MAPPING ........... 82 LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT 47070452 April 2015 iv Milton Keynes Council — Level 1 SFRA Update ABBREVIATIONS ACRONYM DEFINITION ABD Areas Benefiting from Defences AEP Annual Exceedance Probability AOD Above Ordnance Datum AIMS Asset Information Management System AStSWF Areas Susceptible to Surface Water Flooding AWS Anglian Water Services BGDB Bedford Group of Drainage Boards BGS British Geological Survey CFMP Catchment Flood Management Plan Construction Industry Research and Information CIRIA Association DA Designated Area (Milton Keynes) Defra Department for Environment, Flood and Rural Affairs DPD Development Plan Document EU European Union FCERM Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management FEH Flood Estimation Handbook FRA Flood Risk Assessment FRMP Flood Risk Management Plan FWMA Flood and Water Management Act 2010 GIS Geographic Information Systems HCA Homes and Communities Agency IDB Internal Drainage Board LFRMS Local Flood Risk Management Strategy LiDAR Light Detection and Ranging LLFA Lead Local Flood Authority LPA Local Planning Authority LRF Local Resilience Forum LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT 47070452 April 2015 v Milton Keynes Council — Level 1 SFRA Update MKC Milton Keynes Council MKPT Milton Keynes Parks Trust NPPF National Planning Policy Framework NPPG National Planning Policy Guidance PFRA Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment PPS25 Planning Policy Statement 25 RSS Regional Spatial Strategies SFRA Strategic Flood Risk Assessment SLA Strategic Land Allocation SoP Standard of Protection SPG Supplementary Planning Guidance SPZ Source Protection Zone SuDS Sustainable Drainage Systems uFMfSW Updated Flood Map for Surface Water UKCP09 UK Climate Projections 2009 LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT 47070452 April 2015 vi Milton Keynes Council
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Superior Regulation
    L AKE S UPERIOR R EGULATION LAKE SUPERIOR REGULATION: : A ADDRESSING UNCERTAINTY IN UPPER DDRESSING GREAT LAKES WATER LEVELS U NCERTAINTY IN U PPER G REAT L AKES W ATER L EVELS FINAL REPORT TO THE INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION MARCH 2012 Report Cover Changing water levels can have significant effects on the lives of the more than 25 million people who live and work in the upper Great Lakes region. The front cover shows an integrated view of the key interests served by these waters. In the centre of the image is a photograph of the control structures at the outlet of Lake Superior on the St. Marys River, the only location in the entire Great Lakes basin upstream from Niagara Falls where water levels can be affected by regulation. Under the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909, domestic and sanitary water uses, navigation, and power and irrigation are given order of precedence. These uses must be taken into account in the development of regulation plans. Today, it is recognized that other interests have rights under the Treaty, consistent with the International Joint Commission’s balancing principle – providing benefits or relief to interests affected by water levels and flows without causing undue detriment to other interests. With this in mind, the International Upper Great Lakes Study added the interests of ecosystems, coastal zone uses and recreational boating and tourism to its analysis of Lake Superior regulation and uncertainty in future upper Great Lakes water levels. In addition, the Study recognized that First Nations in Canada, Native Americans and Métis represent an important perspective in the upper Great Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • A CRITICAL EVALUATION of the LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD of the CHALK UPLANDS of NORTHWEST EUROPE Lesley
    A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD OF THE CHALK UPLANDS OF NORTHWEST EUROPE The Chilterns, Pegsdon, Bedfordshire (photograph L. Blundell) Lesley Blundell UCL Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD September 2019 2 I, Lesley Blundell, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed: 3 4 Abstract Our understanding of early human behaviour has always been and continues to be predicated on an archaeological record unevenly distributed in space and time. More than 80% of British Lower-Middle Palaeolithic findspots were discovered during the late 19th/early 20th centuries, the majority from lowland fluvial contexts. Within the British planning process and some academic research, the resultant findspot distributions are taken at face value, with insufficient consideration of possible bias resulting from variables operating on their creation. This leads to areas of landscape outside the river valleys being considered to have only limited archaeological potential. This thesis was conceived as an attempt to analyse the findspot data of the Lower-Middle Palaeolithic record of the Chalk uplands of southeast Britain and northern France within a framework complex enough to allow bias in the formation of findspot distribution patterns and artefact preservation/discovery opportunities to be identified and scrutinised more closely. Taking a dynamic, landscape = record approach, this research explores the potential influence of geomorphology, 19th/early 20th century industrialisation and antiquarian collecting on the creation of the Lower- Middle Palaeolithic record through the opportunities created for artefact preservation and release.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Stone Study a Building Stone Atlas of Cambridgeshire (Including Peterborough)
    Strategic Stone Study A Building Stone Atlas of Cambridgeshire (including Peterborough) Published January 2019 Contents The impressive south face of King’s College Chapel, Cambridge (built 1446 to 1515) mainly from Magnesian Limestone from Tadcaster (Yorkshire) and Kings Cliffe Stone (from Northamptonshire) with smaller amounts of Clipsham Stone and Weldon Stone Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Cambridgeshire Bedrock Geology Map ........................................................................................................... 2 Cambridgeshire Superficial Geology Map....................................................................................................... 3 Stratigraphic Table ........................................................................................................................................... 4 The use of stone in Cambridgeshire’s buildings ........................................................................................ 5-19 Background and historical context ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5 The Fens ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 South
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Physical Characteristics of the Study Area
    CHAPTER 2 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY AREA 2.1. Location of study area The study area incorporates part of north Hertfordshire, south and mid- Bedfordshire as well as the southwest corner of Cambridgeshire and lies approximately 40 km north of London (Figure 1.1). Coverage of the area by British Geological Survey (BGS) 1:50,000 map sheets is shown in Figure 2.1. 2.2. Bedrock geology The strikes of the solid geological formations are approximately northeast- southwest across the study area (Figure 2.2). The solid geological succession is shown in Table 2.1. To the northwest of the Chiltern Hills the Gault Clay forms a rich agricultural landscape, representing a continuation of the Vale of Aylesbury. Beyond this, running approximately from Bow Brickhill (SP915343) to Gamlingay (TL234525) is a discontinuous ridge formed by the Woburn Sands Formation, part of the Lower Greensand. This prominent ‘Greensand Ridge’, rising to 170 m O.D. at Bow Brickhill, separates the Cretaceous clays from the Jurassic Oxford and Ampthill Clays to the northwest. The oldest formation is recorded in a borehole (TL23NE1) at Ashwell (TL286390), where Devonian strata were reached at a depth of 186.54 m, i.e. 93 m below O.D. (Smith, 1992). Lying just beyond the northern boundary of the present study area, north of the River Ouse, a borehole (TL15NE2) at Wyboston (TL175572) penetrated Ordovician rocks of Tremadoc age at a depth of approximately 230 m (Moorlock et al ., 2003). The Oxford Clay of the Upper Jurassic represents the oldest formation outcropping within the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Zander Are Now in the Tove!
    Chronicle & Echo - Northamptonshire weekly paper - angling column as supplied for Thursday February 11, 2016 (version printed in newspaper may differ) Predator angler targets alien species – and proves that... Zander are now in the Tove! ANDER – love 'em or hate 'em the ● RINGER Pairs, Boddington: Karl Conley 113lb, Neil Zsupremely invasive alien predator can Russell 112lb, Glen Maxwell 110lb. Russell and Chris Hill spread faster than office gossip. were top pair. ● And now they have reached the River Tove – just above CASTLE Ashby open, Grendon Lake, Sunday: Chris where the tiny river empties into the Ouse at Cosgrove! Garrett 112-4, Steve Shakespeare 93lb, Phil Wintle 61-12. ● WHITE Hart Flore, Barby Banks: Getting in before the floods (a 'Griffiths family benefit') Trevor started, Castlethorpe's 91lb, Mark 58lb, Dave 51lb. Trevor Ray set out to confirm ■ A WINNER his belief that Zs were in the on the Nene: ● FLORE & Brockhall, Silver Lake: river – washed through from Danny Rob 'three-wins-in-a-row-now' the canal at Stoke – by Harding had Rawlins 9-8 of roach, Bert Isle 8- 33-10 in an targeting them with pieces of 12, Steve Smith 3-8. open at Islip. roach, two miles from the ● NENE, long pound, Stoke: Bob Photo Chris Eales 9-6, Brian Beard 8-10, Andy cut. Morehen "I caught one at the first Kimpton and George Mynard both attempt (around 10 ounces) it 4-9. was obvious they would end ● TOWCESTER Vets, Stow Hill cut: up in the river eventually," Bob Eales 3lb, Tosh Saunders 1- said the man who, a week 15, George Mynard 1-7.
    [Show full text]
  • Béng Salang Drainage Basin Ghn'öm#Iaötii:;^Iiïmbóclia:;S:*' ;;; Sawa
    |||«|iBi-««ss«,,,,.,„ •<îouueirânià"fYon*afrtWi&WP*»**"«**»s «"••••-•-•••-!\i-olhörlanHc:ïnÏT^SAïyiilfÏftft M#**iiiii l ; 1 f s December11990 liiiilis OttWWIayts l''*t**. iMvr'fc^^sW«*i s ' '^*" "*'*'***™*** "yK'!.TiS'syW%sii!^^ii^ïl m •** ••,.. •.. "'. '""" '!IS ' h '' * *W*i*»*hWer8rrt«3(a^OeweJopmênt ' ' J|'* jj^jj^ ^f T^fOJD ê ratiïMT * * • * * * • < ; s is 111 41 II 622 KHPH90 * Mi M SM | i iitl Hi • j* UNI», S ' • !•) f J 'Itlli,. iNiiiiii 'MM! ill ( tuti s t illililiiilllllllll^^^ ••IIIINI 4 !i'» < :*iH:1::iN|M|()||:ï::|:::-:i::::..: :|!:;| lilli • < iBiitiiiiit lllllNilHIilltii: MîMM MMI ! M f ! H t II ÜÏ >**ii;ii|i!i|ï «IliliiNliiiiii •I ••••: Jill!:!*::::. Béng Salang Drainage Basin : ' i * * i hllil ghn'öm#iaötii:;^iiïmbóclia:;s:*' ;;; r, i I • Consultancy Group for Utrecht, The Netherlands sawa Watersupply, Sanitation, Agriculture and Waterrnanagement International Institute for Delft, The Netherlands Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering DELFT LIBRARY ïERMATiONAL RFFERENCE CENT -•? COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY ••i'M-ilTATIQN (IRC1 December 1990 Municipality of Phnom-Penh NOVIB Sewerage Department Drainage Study of Beng Salang Drainage Basin Phnom-Penh, Cambodia LIBRARY, INTERNATIONAL REFERENCE CENTRE FOR COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY •v^iD SANITATION (IRC) . ). Box 93190, 2509 AD The Hagu» u;l. 1070) 814911 ext 141(142 International Institute for Consultancy Group for Hydraulic and Environmental Watersupply, Sanitation, Agriculture Engineering and Watermanagement P.O. Box 3015 Schoolplein 7 2601 DA Delft 3581 PX Utrecht The Netherlands
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 2013 Appendix B5
    ID³ Location1 Watercourse and Cause2 Dates Source Comments Staffordshire Past-Track 1 Near Uttoxeter River Dove Oct-03 Photos showing waterlogged fields http://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/ Picknall brook Staffordshire Past-Track 3ft/1m depth 2 Hockley Road 1946 Cause i? http://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/ Photo included Picknall brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 3 Hockley Road 2000 81.34m AOD Cause i? Jun-06 Picknall brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 4 Downstream of Hockley Road 2000 81.20m AOD Cause i? Jun-06 Picknall brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 5 Bridge Street/Brookside Road 2000 77.67m AOD Cause i? Jun-06 Picknall brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 6 Station Road Brookside Road 2000 77.72m AOD Cause i? Jun-06 Picknall Brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 7 Hockley Road Oct/Nov 2000 5 properties flooded. Cause i? Jun-06 8 Picknall Brook Flood Warning given (8a-8b) Stafford Road to Racecourse Cause i? Dec-03 Environment Agency ‘Provision of Flood Warnings’ Report to Defra April 2005 Floodplain flooded only Staffordshire Past-Track 9 Dove Bank Snow thaw so possibly Cause iv? 1946 Photo included http://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/ BBC Nottingham News 10 Railway line Cause iv? Nov-00 Railway line closed Stoke on Trent to Derby line http://www.bbc.co.uk/nottingham/news/2000_11/09/floods_traveldetails.shtml (Feeder brook to Picknall) Big flood problem just after the three tributaries join as the culvert is not big enough to cope 11 Foxglove Avenue Area Regular Emma Roberts (Council) Cause iii and cause i with the runoff from hills plus the new development (housing estate) (Feeder brook to Picknall Brook) 12 Kingfisher Way Winter 2006/7 and a few before Emma Roberts (Council) Problems with the capacity of the culvert Cause i and cause iii Very small section 13 Between Park Street and The Dove Way Cause iii ? Emma Roberts (Council) of culvert neglected by the EA.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 8 Page.Pub
    Raymond Waterways Newsletter Published by Raymond Waterways Protective Association “To protect and improve pond and lake water quality and foster watershed stewardship” June 2004 Dear Friends of Raymond Waterways; Inside this Issue: After experiencing a “non-winter” with cerned about and this one is very close to Milfoil Update 2 hardly any snow, we anxiously await a nor- us. Little Sebago Lake has a close relative mal summer, replete with warm tempera- of variable milfoil called Myrophyllum RWPA Structure 3 tures and sunny days. pinnatum. We know that this new (to us) Lake Associations 3 plant does not have flowers like variable First, a change of date... Thomas Pond 4 You may be a bit surprised by the early milfoil, making it even more difficult to Conservation Project arrival of this publication. We surmised identify! that most people’s interest in lake activities The first line of defense, our staff... Panther Pond 4 is greater in early summer rather than late We have been fortunate to acquire the ser- Watershed Survey in the season and it gives us a chance to let vices of Noralee Raymond as Executive Crescent & Raymond 5 you know about upcoming trainings and Director. She is in charge of education, Project Completed events, hence the change. Hope you agree. overall coordination, and is the person to Free Technical 5 And, what’s on our mind is... contact for all communications. She will Assistance Of course the milfoil situation. While it is be active in running both the Milfoil 2003 Water Quality 6 very true that Raymond is surrounded by Ranger Program and the Watershed Stew- Monitoring Results infected lakes (North-Parker Pond, East- ards Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Watermeadows Management Plan 2017-32 Acknowledgements
    Watermeadows Management Plan 2017-32 Acknowledgements Watermeadows Management Plan 2017-32 The Watermeadows Landscape Management Plan has been written and compiled by Red Kite Network Limited on behalf of Cherwell District Council and South Northamptonshire District Council. Staff from the District Council and the local community have also contributed to the development of the Plan. Red Kite would like to acknowledge the support and assistance from the following people and organisations: Councillor Roger Clarke, South Northamptonshire Council Paul Almond, Street Scene and Landscape Manager at Cherwell District and South Northamptonshire Councils Brian Collins, Landscape Officer at Cherwell District and South Northamptonshire Councils Towcester Town Council Alex Rothwell, Paul Wilkanowski and Helen Chapman from the Environment Agency Towcester Wildlife Trust Group Dr James Littlemore, Senior Lecturer, and Students of Moulton College Further information about the Plan is available from: South Northamptonshire Council The Forum, Moat Lane, Towcester, Northants, NN12 6AD Tel: 01327 322 322 Acknowledgements | 2 Contents Technical overview 3.0 Where do we want to go? Executive summary 3.1 Introduction 19 1.0 Introduction, Context and Background 3.2 SWOT analysis 19 1.1 Statement of Significance 6 3.3 Evaluation 22 1.2 Background to Plan 6 3.4 The Future 23 1.3 Format of Plan 6 3.5 Intervention Areas 25 1.4 Purpose of Plan 7 3.6 Zones and Trails 26 1.5 Development of Plan 7 4.0 How are we going to get there? 1.6 Stakeholder Invovlement and Target
    [Show full text]
  • Official Guide and Map
    TOWCESTER Official Guide and Map Delivered by Royal Mail to residents and businesses in Towcester. Also available from Town Council offices and to view online at www.towcester-tc.gov.uk Please tell the advertiser you saw them in the Towcester Official Guide and Map Award winning salon ‘Creative Salon Award’ Award winning stylists Salon and stylists state registered - National Federation of Hairdressing AWARD LOOKING YOU! Please visit our website for current offers and discounts or contact one of our friendly staff on: 01327 353143 [email protected] || www.flamehairstudios.co.uk Unit 4 - 6 Shire Court, 25 Richmond Road, Towcester, NN12 6EX 1 Please tell the advertiser you saw them in the Towcester Official Guide and Map TOWCESTER Official Guide and Map Issued by the authority of Towcester Town Council www.towcester-tc.gov.uk © Designed and Published by Local Authority Publishing Co. Ltd. www.localauthoritypublishing.co.uk View the online version at www.officialguides.co.uk Newman & Reidy Isuzu, the leading independent used car & van sales and service centre, in the South Northants and Milton Keynes areas. Established over 20 years. We have been selling New and Used vehicles since 2000 and over the years supplied in excess of 6,000 cars and vans all over the UK. Our service and reputation is outstanding, with many customers returning again and again for repairs, MOT’s and vehicle purchases. We look forward to being of service to the local community for many years to come, please feel free to come and put us to the test. The Name
    [Show full text]
  • Simonton Lake Diagnostic/Feasibility Study Elkhart County, Indiana
    Simonton Lake Diagnostic/Feasibility Study Elkhart County, Indiana May 2011 Prepared for: Simonton Lake Home Owners Association c/o William Broderick 1424 Johnson St. Elkhart, IN 46514 Prepared by: 708 Roosevelt Road Walkerton, Indiana 46574 (574) 586-3400 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Simonton Lake is a 301 acre (121.8 hectares) groundwater fed lake located in the northwest portion of Elkhart County Indiana. The Simonton Lake watershed extends north of Simonton Lake into Cass County, Michigan and encompasses approximately 5,233 acres (2,177.7 ha). The lake drains south through Lilly Creek (Osolo Township Ditch) into the St. Joseph River then to Lake Michigan. The soils surrounding the lake are primarily sands from glacial outwash or low muck areas that are wetlands. Soil erosion is not an issue as there are no permanently flowing surface streams entering Simonton Lake. Historically, the watershed was primarily upland deciduous forest pocketed with prairie, sedge meadow, swamp, and seeps. The watershed is now approximately 60 percent agricultural and 40 percent low intensity residential development, with residents in the vicinity of the lake connected to sewers since 1999-2000. A review of residential development around the lake noted 20 structures in 1939 on the south side of the west basin. By 1951, North Shore Drive had been extended to the narrows with over 30 homes along the northern lakeshore and approximately 30 homes on the south side. Development of the channels on the east end of the east basin began in 1957. By this time, as many as 100 structures existed on the south side of the west basin.
    [Show full text]
  • 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]