DOCSLIB.ORG

Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Version Date Authors Notes 4.0 January 2009 MHa, MCH, PB, MD, AMcV Edits and updates from wider consultation group 5.0 May 2009 MHa, MCH, PB, MD, AMcV, GDB, RM Additional edits and corrections 6.0 November 2009 Mha, GH, AF, GDB, RM Additional edits and corrections This document was prepared by Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes Environmental Records Centre (BMERC) and Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and commissioned by the Oxfordshire and Berkshire Local Authorities and by Buckinghamshire County Council Contents 1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................4 2.0 Selection Criteria for Local Wildlife Sites .....................................................6 3.0 Where does a Local Wildlife Site start and finish? Drawing the line............. 17 4.0 UKBAP Habitat descriptions ………………………………………………………………….19 4.1 Lowland Calcareous Grassland………………………………………………………… 20 4.2 Lowland Dry Acid Grassland................................................................ 23 4.3 Lowland Meadows.............................................................................. 26 4.4 Lowland heathland............................................................................. 29 4.5 Eutrophic Standing Water ................................................................... 32 4.6. Mesotrophic Lakes ............................................................................ 35 4.7 Ponds................................................................................................ 38 4.8 Lowland Fens..................................................................................... 40 4.9 Purple moor-grass and Rush Pasture................................................... 44 4.10 Coastal and Floodplain Grazing Marsh................................................ 46 4.11 Reedbeds ........................................................................................ 50 4.12 Rivers.............................................................................................. 51 4.13 Woodland ........................................................................................ 55 4.14 Wood pasture and parkland ............................................................. 62 4.15 Traditional Orchards......................................................................... 66 4.16 Open mosaic habitats on previously developed land ........................... 68 Other Associated Habitats and Features……………………………………………………….71 4.17 Hedgerows ..................................................................................... 71 4.18 Arable Field Margins ……………………………………………………………………..74 4.19 Veteran Trees ………………………………………………………………………………76 5.0 Species criteria for identifying Local Wildlife Sites...................................... 78 5.1. Vascular plants ................................................................................. 82 5.2. Bryophytes ....................................................................................... 93 5.3. Stoneworts ....................................................................................... 94 5.4. Lichens............................................................................................. 95 5.5. Fungi................................................................................................ 96 5.6. Mammals.......................................................................................... 97 5.7. Birds ................................................................................................ 98 5.8. Amphibians and reptiles .................................................................. 103 5.9. Fish................................................................................................ 105 - 2 - 5.10. Invertebrates: butterflies ............................................................... 106 5.11. Invertebrates: moths..................................................................... 108 5.12. Invertebrates: dragonflies and damselflies...................................... 111 5.13. Invertebrates: other groups ........................................................... 113 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... 115 References ................................................................................................. 116 Appendix 1 UKBAP Habitat resources in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire............................................................................... 120 Appendix 2. Habitat identification species lists .............................................. 122 Appendix 3 Criteria for identifying Local Wildlife Sites based on species information: dragonflies/damselflies (Odonata) .............................................. 153 - 3 - 1.0 Introduction 1.1 What is a Local Wildlife Site? Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) are non-statutory sites of significant value for the conservation of wildlife. These sites represent local character and distinctiveness and have an important role to play in meeting local and national targets for biodiversity conservation. The purpose of their selection is to provide recognition of their value and to help conserve those features by affording a level of protection. The overall objective of a Local Wildlife Sites system was defined by DETR (2000) as: “The series of non-statutory Local Sites seeks to ensure, in the public interest, the conservation, maintenance and enhancement of species, habitats, geological and geomorphological features of substantive nature conservation value. Local Site systems should select all areas of substantive value including both the most important and the most distinctive species, habitats, geological and geomorphological features within a national, regional and local context. Sites within the series may also have an important role in contributing to the public enjoyment of nature conservation .”* As the quotation above indicates, the LWS network is an inclusive and comprehensive set of sites. LWS may support habitats and species of national significance or they may be of more local importance. They should take account of geographical variations in habitat types and biological features at a county level. This is in contrast to statutory nature conservation sites such as SSSIs (Sites of Special Scientific Interest) which are a representative suite of sites that exemplify the nation’s most important wildlife and geological features. LWS may therefore hold as much biodiversity or geodiversity interest as the national SSSIs – or may be of more local importance. The selection of LWS is based on evidence collected in the field and tested against a set of locally agreed criteria. DEFRA guidance on the identification, selection and management of Local Sites was published in February 2006**. The purpose of this guidance was to provide a transparent and consistent approach to the operation of Local Sites systems. It encouraged all Local Sites partnerships to reassess their position and this led to the joined-up review of the LWS Selection Criteria for Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire as set out in this document. Local Sites with a geological interest are often referred to as Regionally Important Geological/Geomorphological Sites (RIGS). These are covered by a separate set of criteria. *Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) Local Sites Review Group, April 2000. ** ‘Local Sites – Guidance on their Identification, Selection and Management’, Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (2006) - 4 - 1.2 Local Wildlife Sites and RIGS in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire. 1.2.1 Local Wildlife Sites In common with many other counties in England, the LWS systems in Berkshire and Oxfordshire started in earnest in the early 1990s, whilst Buckinghamshire had started in the 1980s. The Wildlife Trust for the three Counties – Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust (BBOWT) - was instrumental in providing the impetus and the manpower to get the LWS systems going, with the invaluable support of the County Ecologists, Nature Conservancy Council and Local Authority countryside / ecological staff, including those working in the County Local Environmental Records Centres. The Local Wildlife Site systems in the three counties have developed independently, but all have the following: • A rolling programme of field survey to keep site data up to date • A panel of ecologists and others who select and de-select sites • A set of written criteria to guide the selection of sites In 2006, a three county review of the Local Wildlife Site systems was initiated by Local Authorities in order to share the best practice from each county, incorporate new guidance, standardise the selection criteria for the three counties and to make the systems more transparent and accountable. The review has been carried out by a group of ecologists and others from each of the counties. The Local Wildlife Site review panel agreed that a key feature of any Local Wildlife Sites system is the criteria that are used to select and de-select sites. The development of a comprehensive and clear set of new criteria was commissioned by Local Authorities from the three counties and the work was carried out by Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes Environmental Records Centre (BMERC) and the Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Elementos Para El Conocimiento De Los
    Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A.), nº 49 (31/12/2011): 309‒319. ELEMENTOS PARA EL CONOCIMIENTO DE LOS MELÁNDRIDOS Y TETRATÓMIDOS DEL NORTE DE ESPAÑA Y ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL CATÁLOGO DE ESPECIES IBÉRICAS (COLEOPTERA: TENEBRIONOIDEA: MELANDRYIDAE, TETRATOMIDAE) J. I. Recalde Irurzun1 & I. Pérez-Moreno2 1 C/Andreszar, 21. 31610 Villava. Navarra. Spain. ‒ [email protected] 2 Universidad de La Rioja. Depto. de Agricultura y Alimentación. C/Madre de Dios, 51. 26006. Logroño. Spain. ‒ [email protected] Resumen: Se registran 18 especies de Melandryidae y 2 de Tetratomidae de provincias septentrionales españolas. Dos de estas especies (Anisoxya fuscula (Illiger, 1798) e Hypulus quercinus (Quensel, 1790)) son nuevas para las faunas española e ibérica. Se presenta una lista de la fauna ibérica española de melándridos (27 especies) y tetratómidos (7 especies), junto con una actualiza- ción de su distribución conocida. Palabras clave: Coleoptera, Melandryidae, Tetratomidae, Tenebrionoidea, escarabajos saproxílicos, España. Contribution to the knowledge of the melandrids and tetratomids of northern Spain, with an update of the catalogue of Ibe- rian species (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea: Melandryidae, Tetratomidae) Abstract: Eighteen species of Melandryidae and two of Tetratomidae are recorded from northern Spanish provinces. Two of those species (Anisoxya fuscula (Illiger, 1798) and Hypulus quercinus (Quensel, 1790)) are new records both for the Spanish and Iberian faunas. A list of the Spanish Iberian melandrids (27 species) and tetratomids (7 species) is presented, together with an update of their known distribution. Key words: Coleoptera, Melandryidae, Tetratomidae, Tenebrionoidea, saproxylic beetles, Spain. Introducción La superfamilia Tenebrionoidea Latreille, 1802 está constitui- desarrollados, sobre todo el artejo terminal, que adquiere da por un grupo de familias de apariencia y biología diversa formas diversas en las diferentes especies.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Index May 2021
    Wycombe Wildlife Group (WWG) newsletter index (Revised 26 May 2021) Wycombe Wildlife Group has produced a newsletter 3 times a year since the Group was formed, initially as Wycombe Urban Wildlife Group, in 1989. Copies of all the newsletters issued have been placed on this website to provide a record of the history of the Group and some of its achievements and failures in carrying out its planned objectives. This index includes reports and articles published in the newsletters containing material relating to wildlife species and their conservation, wildlife habitats and their management, as well as listing past activities such as walks, talks and visits. The list is divided into categories to make it easier to find items on particular subjects. Each item on the list shows the number of the newsletter in which it was published.By selecting the relevant issue number from the list of issued newsletters, you can view or, if necessary, download that issue. This index will be updated following the issue of each future newsletter, and amended to take account of any changes considered necessary following the receipt of comments and/or suggested changes from members. Index of WUWG/WWG newsletter items (Revised May 2021) Group activities 24 hour Wildlife Watch Marathon (Issues 5, 6 and 24) Chair Museum wildlife garden (Issue 8) Create a Hedgerow project (Issue 34) Creation of bat hibernaculum at Booker (Issue 6) Grange Farm and Terriers Farm - fauna and flora surveys (Issue 35) Hang on to hedgerows project (Issues 30-32) Hedgehog survey (Issues 5
    [Show full text]
  • Succession of Coleoptera on Freshly Killed
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2008 Succession of Coleoptera on freshly killed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and southern red oak (Quercus falcata Michaux) in Louisiana Stephanie Gil Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Gil, Stephanie, "Succession of Coleoptera on freshly killed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and southern red oak (Quercus falcata Michaux) in Louisiana" (2008). LSU Master's Theses. 1067. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1067 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SUCCESSIO OF COLEOPTERA O FRESHLY KILLED LOBLOLLY PIE (PIUS TAEDA L.) AD SOUTHER RED OAK ( QUERCUS FALCATA MICHAUX) I LOUISIAA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Entomology by Stephanie Gil B. S. University of New Orleans, 2002 B. A. University of New Orleans, 2002 May 2008 DEDICATIO This thesis is dedicated to my parents who have sacrificed all to give me and my siblings a proper education. I am indebted to my entire family for the moral support and prayers throughout my years of education. My mother and Aunt Gloria will have several extra free hours a week now that I am graduating.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Woodland Restoration Phase Three: Maximising Ecological Integrity
    Practical Guidance Module 5 Ancient woodland restoration Phase three: maximising ecological integrity Contents 1 Introduction ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������3 2 How to maximise ecological integrity ��������������������������������������4 2�1 More ‘old-growth characteristics’ ������������������������������������4 2�1�1 More old trees ���������������������������������������������������������5 • Let natural processes create old trees • Use management interventions to maintain and develop more old trees 2�1�2 More decaying wood����������������������������������������������8 • Let natural processes create decaying wood • Use management interventions to maintain and create more decaying wood • Veteranisation techniques can create wood- decay habitats on living trees 2�1�3 Old-growth groves �����������������������������������������������15 • Use minimum intervention wisely to help develop old-growth characteristics 2�2 Better space and dynamism �������������������������������������������17 2�2�1 Let natural processes create space and dynamism ��������������������������������������������������17 2�2�2 Manage animals as an essential natural process ������������������������������������������������������ 22 • Consider restoration as more than just managing the trees 2�2�3 Use appropriate silvicultural interventions ��� 28 • Use near-to-nature forestry to create better space and dynamism 2�3 Better physical health ����������������������������������������������������� 33 2�3�1 Better water ��������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • New Species of Gondwanamyces from Dying Euphorbia Trees in South Africa
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences Faculty Publications Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences 2012 New Species of Gondwanamyces From Dying Euphorbia Trees in South Africa Johannes Alwyn van der Linde Diana Six University of Montana - Missoula, [email protected] Michael J. Wingfield Jolanda Roux Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/decs_pubs Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation van der Linde, Johannes Alwyn; Six, Diana; Wingfield, Michael J.; and Roux, Jolanda, "New Species of Gondwanamyces From Dying Euphorbia Trees in South Africa" (2012). Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences Faculty Publications. 36. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/decs_pubs/36 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mycologia, 104(2), 2012, pp. 574–584. DOI: 10.3852/11-166 # 2012 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 New species of Gondwanamyces from dying Euphorbia trees in South Africa Johannes Alwyn van der Linde in Custingophora (Kolarˇı´k and Hulcr 2009). Custingo- Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, DST/ phora species have mononematous conidiophores that NRF Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology terminate in obovoid conidiogenous cells with distinct (CTHB), Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology collarettes and conidia. The Gondwanamyces teleo- Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, PBag X20, Hatfield, Pretoria 0028, South Africa morphs are characterized by ascomata similar to those of species of Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma , with globose Diana L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 City of York Biodiversity Action Plan
    CITY OF YORK Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2017 City of York Local Biodiversity Action Plan - Executive Summary What is biodiversity and why is it important? Biodiversity is the variety of all species of plant and animal life on earth, and the places in which they live. Biodiversity has its own intrinsic value but is also provides us with a wide range of essential goods and services such as such as food, fresh water and clean air, natural flood and climate regulation and pollination of crops, but also less obvious services such as benefits to our health and wellbeing and providing a sense of place. We are experiencing global declines in biodiversity, and the goods and services which it provides are consistently undervalued. Efforts to protect and enhance biodiversity need to be significantly increased. The Biodiversity of the City of York The City of York area is a special place not only for its history, buildings and archaeology but also for its wildlife. York Minister is an 800 year old jewel in the historical crown of the city, but we also have our natural gems as well. York supports species and habitats which are of national, regional and local conservation importance including the endangered Tansy Beetle which until 2014 was known only to occur along stretches of the River Ouse around York and Selby; ancient flood meadows of which c.9-10% of the national resource occurs in York; populations of Otters and Water Voles on the River Ouse, River Foss and their tributaries; the country’s most northerly example of extensive lowland heath at Strensall Common; and internationally important populations of wetland birds in the Lower Derwent Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • FOURTH UPDATE to a CHECKLIST of the LEPIDOPTERA of the BRITISH ISLES , 2013 1 David J
    Ent Rec 133(1).qxp_Layout 1 13/01/2021 16:46 Page 1 Entomologist’s Rec. J. Var. 133 (2021) 1 FOURTH UPDATE TO A CHECKLIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF THE BRITISH ISLES , 2013 1 DAvID J. L. A GASSIz , 2 S. D. B EAvAN & 1 R. J. H ECkFoRD 1 Department of Life Sciences, Division of Insects, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD 2 The Hayes, Zeal Monachorum, Devon EX17 6DF Abstract This update incorporates information published since 30 November 2019 and before 1 January 2021 into A Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the British Isles, 2013. Introduction The Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the British Isles has previously been amended (Agassiz, Beavan & Heckford 2016a, 2016b, 2019 and 2020). This update details 4 species new to the main list and 3 to Appendix A. Numerous taxonomic changes are incorporated and country distributions are updated. CENSUS The number of species now recorded from the British Isles stands at 2,558 of which 58 are thought to be extinct and in addition there are 191 adventive species. ADDITIONAL SPECIES in main list Also make appropriate changes in the index 15.0715 Phyllonorycter medicaginella (Gerasimov, 1930) E S W I C 62.0382 Acrobasis fallouella (Ragonot, 1871) E S W I C 70.1698 Eupithecia breviculata (Donzel, 1837) Rusty-shouldered Pug E S W I C 72.089 Grammodes bifasciata (Petagna, 1786) Parallel Lines E S W I C The authorship and date of publication of Grammodes bifasciata were given by Brownsell & Sale (2020) as Petagan, 1787 but corrected to Petagna, 1786 by Plant (2020).
    [Show full text]
  • A Baseline Invertebrate Survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015
    A baseline invertebrate survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015 Graeme Lyons May 2016 1 Contents Page Summary...................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................. 5 Methodologies............................................................................... 15 Results....................................................................................... 17 Conclusions................................................................................... 44 Management recommendations........................................................... 51 References & bibliography................................................................. 53 Acknowledgements.......................................................................... 55 Appendices.................................................................................... 55 Front cover: One of the southern fields showing dominance by Common Fleabane. 2 0 – Summary The Knepp Wildlands Project is a large rewilding project where natural processes predominate. Large grazing herbivores drive the ecology of the site and can have a profound impact on invertebrates, both positive and negative. This survey was commissioned in order to assess the site’s invertebrate assemblage in a standardised and repeatable way both internally between fields and sections and temporally between years. Eight fields were selected across the estate with two in the north, two in the central block
    [Show full text]
  • Recerca I Territori V12 B (002)(1).Pdf
    Butterfly and moths in l’Empordà and their response to global change Recerca i territori Volume 12 NUMBER 12 / SEPTEMBER 2020 Edition Graphic design Càtedra d’Ecosistemes Litorals Mediterranis Mostra Comunicació Parc Natural del Montgrí, les Illes Medes i el Baix Ter Museu de la Mediterrània Printing Gràfiques Agustí Coordinadors of the volume Constantí Stefanescu, Tristan Lafranchis ISSN: 2013-5939 Dipòsit legal: GI 896-2020 “Recerca i Territori” Collection Coordinator Printed on recycled paper Cyclus print Xavier Quintana With the support of: Summary Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Xavier Quintana Butterflies of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ................................................................................................................. 11 Tristan Lafranchis Moths of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ............................................................................................................................31 Tristan Lafranchis The dispersion of Lepidoptera in the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ...........................................................51 Tristan Lafranchis Three decades of butterfly monitoring at El Cortalet ...................................................................................69 (Aiguamolls de l’Empordà Natural Park) Constantí Stefanescu Effects of abandonment and restoration in Mediterranean meadows .......................................87
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges And
    driemaandelijks tijdschrift van de VLAAMSE VERENIGING VOOR ENTOMOLOGIE Afgiftekantoor 2170 Merksem 1 ISSN 0771-5277 Periode: oktober – november – december 2002 Erkenningsnr. P209674 Redactie: Dr. J–P. Borie (Compiègne, France), Dr. L. De Bruyn (Antwerpen), T. C. Garrevoet (Antwerpen), B. Goater (Chandlers Ford, England), Dr. K. Maes (Gent), Dr. K. Martens (Brussel), H. van Oorschot (Amsterdam), D. van der Poorten (Antwerpen), W. O. De Prins (Antwerpen). Redactie-adres: W. O. De Prins, Nieuwe Donk 50, B-2100 Antwerpen (Belgium). e-mail: [email protected]. Jaargang 30, nummer 4 1 december 2002 Contribution to the knowledge of the fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges and Noctuidae of the Southern Ural Mountains, with description of a new Dichagyris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae) Kari Nupponen & Michael Fibiger [In co-operation with Vladimir Olschwang, Timo Nupponen, Jari Junnilainen, Matti Ahola and Jari- Pekka Kaitila] Abstract. The list, comprising 624 species in the families Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae and Arctiidae from the Southern Ural Mountains is presented. The material was collected during 1996–2001 in 10 different expeditions. Dichagyris lux Fibiger & K. Nupponen sp. n. is described. 17 species are reported for the first time from Europe: Clostera albosigma (Fitch, 1855), Xylomoia retinax Mikkola, 1998, Ecbolemia misella (Püngeler, 1907), Pseudohadena stenoptera Boursin, 1970, Hadula nupponenorum Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Saragossa uralica Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Conisania arida (Lederer, 1855), Polia malchani (Draudt, 1934), Polia vespertilio (Draudt, 1934), Polia altaica (Lederer, 1853), Mythimna opaca (Staudinger, 1899), Chersotis stridula (Hampson, 1903), Xestia wockei (Möschler, 1862), Euxoa dsheiron Brandt, 1938, Agrotis murinoides Poole, 1989, Agrotis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF ( Final Version , 167Kb )
    52 maart 2015 jaargang104 | 3 natuurhistorisch maandblad Oranje espenspanner na 35 jaar weer waargenomen in Nederland Paul Vossen, Proosdijweg 73, 6214 RK Maastricht, e-mail: [email protected] Op 13 maart 2014 ontdekte de auteur een mannetje van de loopt in Europa grofweg van Bretagne tot aan Marseille. Van hier- uit vormt een rechte lijn naar het oosten toe de zuidgrens van haar Oranje espenspanner (Boudinotiana notha) op het zuide­ areaal. Er is geen duidelijke noordgrens. Behalve in het oostelijk deel lijk deel van de Sint­Pietersberg te Maastricht. In dit arti­ van de Pyreneeën komt de Oranje berkenspanner ook nog in grote delen van Groot-Brittannië voor. kel wordt nader ingegaan op de status van deze soort in Nederland en België en de betekenis van deze waarneming. nederland en belgië archiearinae In Nederland en België leven dus maar twee soorten uit de onderfa- milie van de Archiearinae. Het enige uiterlijke kenmerk waarin deze Wereldwijd telt de onderfamilie Archiearinae van de spanners (Geo- twee soorten echt van elkaar verschillen is de vorm van de sprieten bij metridae) zes families met in totaal dertien soorten. Vier daarvan mannetjes: gekarteld bij de Oranje espenspanner en glad bij de Oran- komen in Europa voor. De Oranje berkenspanner (Archiearis parthe- je berkenspanner. nias) en de Oranje espenspanner komen in Nederland voor en heb- De Oranje berkenspanner is een soort die vroeger in Nederland lokaal ben om die reden ook een Nederlandse naam. De laatste wordt in voorkwam en zeldzaam was maar tegenwoordig, in ieder geval in de literatuur ook vaak Archiearis notha genoemd. De andere twee het oostelijk deel van Nederland, ronduit algemeen is.
    [Show full text]