REPORT of SOCIETY MEETING Tfl's RAIL ACTIVITIES in 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Treachery of Strategic Decisions
The treachery of strategic decisions. An Actor-Network Theory perspective on the strategic decisions that produce new trains in the UK. Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Michael John King. May 2021 Abstract The production of new passenger trains can be characterised as a strategic decision, followed by a manufacturing stage. Typically, competing proposals are developed and refined, often over several years, until one emerges as the winner. The winning proposition will be manufactured and delivered into service some years later to carry passengers for 30 years or more. However, there is a problem: evidence shows UK passenger trains getting heavier over time. Heavy trains increase fuel consumption and emissions, increase track damage and maintenance costs, and these impacts could last for the train’s life and beyond. To address global challenges, like climate change, strategic decisions that produce outcomes like this need to be understood and improved. To understand this phenomenon, I apply Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to Strategic Decision-Making. Using ANT, sometimes described as the sociology of translation, I theorise that different propositions of trains are articulated until one, typically, is selected as the winner to be translated and become a realised train. In this translation process I focus upon the development and articulation of propositions up to the point where a winner is selected. I propose that this occurs within a valuable ‘place’ that I describe as a ‘decision-laboratory’ – a site of active development where various actors can interact, experiment, model, measure, and speculate about the desired new trains. -
Passenger Rolling Stock
1 Foreword Its conclusions are entirely consistent with the findings of the recently published Rail Value for Money Study by Sir Roy McNulty. I am pleased to present the latest output from the Network Route Utilisation Strategy To achieve this will require the procurement of workstream: a draft strategy for passenger rolling stock to be fully aligned with planning the rolling stock procurement and associated capability of the infrastructure across the entire infrastructure planning. The document has network. Piecemeal approaches, or been produced in conjunction with train approaches which give low priority to whole-life operators, representatives of customers, whole-industry costs, to operational flexibility, or manufacturers and rolling stock owning groups to the interface between wheel and rail, are as well as the Department for Transport, unlikely to prove efficient. Transport Scotland, the Welsh Assembly Government, The Passenger Transport Going forward, we seek to work with our Executive Group and Transport for London. industry partners and, through engagement with the Rail Delivery Group, to take on the Under whichever structure the British railway challenge of driving out unnecessary cost from network has been organised, the alignment of the planning of future rolling stock, together passenger rolling stock procurement with a) with the infrastructure to accommodate it, to the customer needs and expectations and b) the ultimate benefit of passenger and taxpayer characteristics of the railway infrastructure has alike. always been complex. The historical development of the railway saw different track Paul Plummer and loading gauges, different platform heights and lengths, different signalling systems, Director, Planning and Development different braking systems, different types of electrification, different lengths of vehicles, different policies on maximum gradients (affecting train weights and speeds), different interior layouts of rolling stock, different operating practices, and so on and so forth. -
TRACTION DECARBONISATION NETWORK STRATEGY Interim Programme Business Case
OFFICIAL TRACTION DECARBONISATION NETWORK STRATEGY Interim Programme Business Case 31st July 2020 OFFICIAL 1. PREFACE Important Notice – This document and its appendices have been produced by Network Rail (NR) in response to a recommendation made by the Rail Industry Decarbonisation Taskforce. The document summarises evidence and analysis carried out by NR in the period between 1st April 2019 and 29th May 2020. This analysis considers technological, operational and economic methodologies to identify the optimum application of decarbonised traction technologies. The document ultimately identifies the optimum deployment of these traction technologies (battery, electrification and hydrogen) on the unelectrified UK rail network. Note that reference to UK railway infrastructure and operations in this document relate to those contained within England, Scotland and Wales and this document does not consider rail operations in Northern Ireland. The primary purpose of this document and its appendices is to provide DfT, Transport Scotland and Welsh Government with recommendations to inform decisions required to remove diesel trains from the network, achieve net-zero legislative targets, and identify the capital works programme required to achieve this. The document should be used to inform discrete project business cases being developed by project teams. The document provides the strategic rationale for rail traction decarbonisation, as well as initial high-level economic and carbon abatement appraisals of options to underpin the recommendations made. The recommendations have been made using a balanced range of priorities and this work has broad cross industry support. This document should be used exclusively for the purposes of informing further development activity to be carried out by the rail industry. -
Long Term Passenger Rolling Stock Strategy for the Rail Industry
Long Term Passenger Rolling Stock Strategy for the Rail Industry Sixth Edition, March 2018 This Long Term Passenger Rolling Stock Strategy has been produced by a Steering Group comprising senior representatives of: • Abellio • Angel Trains • Arriva • Eversholt Rail Group • FirstGroup • Go-Ahead Group • Keolis • Macquarie Rail • MTR • Network Rail • Porterbrook Leasing • Rail Delivery Group • SMBC Leasing • Stagecoach Cover Photos: Top: Bombardier built Class 158 DMU from the early 1990s Middle: New Siemens built Class 707 EMU Bottom: Great Western Railway liveried Hitachi Class 802 Bi-mode awaits roll-out Foreword by the Co-Chairs of the Rolling Stock Strategy Steering Group The Rolling Stock Strategy Steering Group is pleased to be publishing the consolidated views of its cross-industry membership in this sixth edition of the Long Term Passenger Rolling Stock Strategy. The group is formed of representatives from rolling stock owners, train operators, Rail Delivery Group and infrastructure owner Network Rail, and endeavours to provide an up-to-date, balanced and well-informed perspective on the long term outlook for passenger rolling stock in the UK. Investment commitments made in recent years are now being delivered in volume and the benefits of modern, technically advanced trains are being enjoyed by passengers on an increasing number of routes. A further 1,565 vehicles were ordered during the last year, bringing the total commitment since 2014 to nearly 7,200 vehicles. New train manufacturers continue to be drawn to the UK and and other new entrants to the vehicle leasing market have brought additional investment and competition to the specialist sector. -
Wimbledon & Sutton Railway Company a History
Wimbledon & Sutton Railway Company A History The Wimbledon & Sutton Railway Company was established in 1910 to promote and build a railway line (In what was then part of Surrey) from Wimbledon to Sutton, via Merton and Morden, and was promoted by local landowners, hoping to increase the value of their land by attracting property developers to the area. The railway was opened in stages, with the first section opened in February 1912, between Wimbledon and Morden (Later to become Morden Junction), with the final section opening in November the same year. Services were initially operated by a small fleet of 5 0-6-0 locomotives, belonging to the WSR itself (See ‘Locos & Rolling Stock for more detail.) and 4 wheeled coaches, joined throughout 1913 by 4 4-4-0 tender locomotives from Sharp Stewart of Glasgow, similar to the Furness Railways’ K2 Class Locomotives, as well as bogie passenger stock. From the outset this stock was outdated, though it soldiered on in front line service until Electrification, and in secondary use well into Southern and even BR days. From January 1914, the District Railway began services over the line using elderly Condensing Beyer Peacock 4-4-0 tank engines and its own coaching stock, with plans laid (In conjunction with the Wimbledon and Sutton, to whom some of the steam stock would be ‘Cascaded’/Sold.) for electrification, to enable electric trains to travel from central London out to Sutton. The electrification was delayed by the First World War, but work continued in earnest, and work was completed in July 1920, and electric services started the same month. -
Rolling Stock Perspective Second Edition
Rolling Stock Perspective Second edition Moving Britain Ahead May 2016 Rolling Stock Perspective Second edition Moving Britain Ahead The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 General enquiries https://forms.dft.gov.uk Website www.gov.uk/dft © Crown copyright 2016 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. ISBN: 978-1-84864-180-8 Contents Ministerial Foreword 6 Rolling Stock Perspective 8 Summary 8 The future of passenger rolling stock 11 High Speed 2 14 Skills 15 Innovation and Research 17 Digital Future 20 Rolling stock mix 21 UK’s supply -
16 04 Section Activities.Indd
Section Activities A round up of recent activities in our Sections AS PUBLISHED IN The Journal April 2016 Volume 134 Part 2 V.1.0 1 of 39 Sections BIRMINGHAM CROYDON AND BRIGHTON DARLINGTON & NORTH EAST EDINBURGH Our online events calendar holds all GLASGOW of our Section meetings. IRISH LANCASTER, BARROW & CARLISLE You’ll also fi nd full contact details on LONDON our website. MANCHESTER & LIVERPOOL MILTON KEYNES NORTH WALES NOTTINGHAM & DERBY SOUTH & WEST WALES THAMES VALLEY WESSEX WEST OF ENGLAND WEST YORKSHIRE YORK V.1.0 2 of 39 Here is a roundup of some of our Sections’ activities. ASHFORD SECTION No meetings currently planned. Please keep an eye on the website for information as it becomes available. BIRMINGHAM SECTION December 2015 Annual Section Quiz and Social evening On December 10th 2015 Birmingham Section hosted its annual quiz and social evening. Bob Langford, Section Chairman, hosted 8 rounds of general knowledge which was thoroughly enjoyable for all. The night’s winning team was formed of Andy Thornton, Brian Evans, Colin Ainsworth and Simon Roseveare. Congratulations to them. January 2016 Welding advanced Rail Steels, Ian Banton and Howard Smith, Thermit Welding Section Chairman Paul King introduced the speakers and asked them to present their talk. Howard commenced the talk by describing the make-up of rail steels and how this presents unique challenges to welders. Howard discussed the perlitic micro‐structure of rail and elements which are included in small quantities only a few parts per million and why chemically these are included. Howard continued to discuss why in the mid 70s rail production had changed from ingots to a concast methodology and why this had effectively eradicated defects such as tache ovals. -
Long Term Passenger Rolling Stock Strategy for the Rail Industry Fourth Edition, March 2016
Long Term Passenger Rolling Stock Strategy for the Rail Industry Fourth Edition, March 2016 This Long Term Passenger Rolling Stock Strategy has been produced by a Steering Group comprising senior representatives of: • Abellio • Angel Trains • Arriva • Eversholt Rail Group • First Group • Go-Ahead Group • Keolis • National Express • Network Rail • Porterbrook Leasing • Rail Delivery Group Executive Team • Stagecoach Cover Photos: A BR-procured Virgin Trains East Coast Type F IC225 train of 1989; a Siemens FTPE Type B Class 185 DMU introduced in 2005; and a Vossloh ScotRail Type B Class 68 locomotive introduced in 2012 Foreword by Claire Perry MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport I would like to thank the rail industry for this further update of the Long Term Passenger Rolling Stock Strategy. It continues to be a most useful source of information at a time of great change in the rail industry. It also has an important role to play in supporting the Government’s major investments in projects such as Thameslink, Crossrail, electrification, the Northern Powerhouse and HS2. Improvements in rolling stock are part of the Government’s investment in the railways in the largest modernisation since Victorian times that will deliver better journeys for passengers. I welcome the way in which private sector train companies and vehicle owners work in partnership with the Department to deliver for passengers. This partnership is producing innovative plans to expand and update our train fleets to meet the unprecedented growth in passenger numbers. But it is not just about capacity: the quality of the journey is crucial as well. -
Autonomous Power Options for UK Rolling Stock (Pdf)
MSc in Railway Systems Engineering and Integration College of Engineering, School of Civil Engineering University of Birmingham Dissertation - Network Energy Strategy: Rolling Stock Gap Analysis Author: Giles Pettit Supervisor: Stephen Kent Date: 5th March 2017 Issue 2 © University of Bi rmingham 2017 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of MSc in Railway Systems Engineering & Integration Dissertation - Network Energy Strategy: Rolling Stock Gap Analysis Preliminaries Author: Giles Pettit Executive Summary The electrification of railways is a preferred state of technology due to performance, whole life cost, and the environmental sustainability of power at the point of use. However despite current programmes to increase the electrified extent on the GB network, there will remain a need for roughly 3,000 self-powered passenger vehicles to retain the current level of services. This report reviews both the network and fleet situation and explores the potential for different vehicle power options in the future, given the increasing unacceptability of diesel use in urban and city areas. Having undertaken a qualitative review by passenger franchise area, it was found that there are nine areas which are at risk of having either a moderate, considerable or substantial gap in the provision of electrification. One franchise area – Midland Main Line and East Midlands Regional – was considered as having a substantial gap, and this area was chosen for detailed analysis. On the assumption that diesel-only -
UK Pocket Book 2020
Inter City Railway Society UK Rail Series No.1 UK Pocket Book 2020 (15th edition) Researched & Compiled by: Trevor Roots Printed by: Henry Ling Ltd, The Dorset Press, Dorchester DT1 1HD Cover Photographs: Front: GBRf 66747, Eastleigh Works, 4th July 2019 (Carl Watson) Rear: (clockwise from top left) nd Bombardier 08682, Derby Litchurch Lane, 2 September 2019 (Spencer Conquest) th MPV DR 98008, Eastleigh, 16 December 2019 (Colin Pidgeon) th 4-6-2 35018, Swindon, 9 July 2019 (Chris Addoo) th Northern 195115, Grange-over-Sands, 30 July 2019 (Martin Evans) th GA 745010, Ipswich, 19 January 2020 (Keith Partlow) th BFT trams 631, 718 & 227, Blackpool, 28 December 2019 (Harold Hull) st GBRF 90044, Crewe, 21 January 2020 (Eddie Rathmill) th LU L132 + TRC 999666 + L133, Ealing Broadway, 30 April 2019 (Alan Jones) th TfW 67025, Eastleigh Depot, 19 November 2019 (Derek Everson) (bottom right) Cl.101 DMU 50266 Loughborough Central, GCR, 16th November 2019 (Trevor Roots) 1 CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................3 Locomotives Shunting ..........................................................................................................5 Mainline Diesel ..............................................................................................15 Mainline Electric DC ...................................................................................43 AC ..................................................................................44 -
Long Term Passenger Rolling Stock Strategy for the Rail Industry Fifth Edition, March 2017 Foreword by the Co-Chairs of the Rolling Stock Strategy Steering Group
Long Term Passenger Rolling Stock Strategy for the Rail Industry Fifth Edition, March 2017 Foreword by the Co-Chairs of the Rolling Stock Strategy Steering Group We are pleased to be publishing this fifth annual edition of the Long Term Passenger Rolling Stock This Long Term Passenger Rolling Stock Strategy has been Strategy. This is intended to bring some clarity to the planning of the railway of the future. Modern, produced by a Steering Group comprising senior representatives of: comfortable and reliable trains are key to improving the experience of rail passengers, and this strategy portrays a welcome picture of the private sector and government working together to • Abellio invest in the nation’s future. • Angel Trains • Arriva With rolling stock orders now at an historically high level, the capability of the industry to build, • Eversholt Rail Group deliver and introduce reliable new trains to service is of critical importance. We recognise and • FirstGroup the industry as a whole will be addressing the key issues that will accompany such a tremendous • Go-Ahead Group investment. Since 2014, over £10bn has been committed on orders for over 6,000 new rail vehicles • Keolis for UK train operators. Some of these trains are already in service, and in the next few years the • Macquarie Rail benefit of this massive investment will become evident across the country. • MTR • Network Rail We particularly welcome the innovation taking place in the rolling stock arena and are determined • Porterbrook Leasing that these investments will reduce the carbon footprint of train travel, while retaining flexibility • Rail Delivery Group Executive Team and convenience for passengers. -
Railway Electrification Systems & Engineering
First Edition, 2012 ISBN 978-81-323-4395-0 © All rights reserved. Published by: White Word Publications 4735/22 Prakashdeep Bldg, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, Delhi - 110002 Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Railway Electrification System Chapter 2 - Traction Power Network Chapter 3 - Railway Electric Traction Chapter 4 - Electric Locomotive Chapter 5 - Pantograph (Rail) Chapter 6 - Electric Multiple Unit Chapter 7 - Trolley Pole Chapter 8 - Third Rail Chapter 9 - Overhead Lines Chapter 10 - Ground-Level Power Supply Chapter 1 Railway Electrification System Electric locomotives under the wires in Sweden Overhead wire and catenary in Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States A railway electrification system supplies electrical energy to railway locomotives and multiple units so that they can operate without having an on-board prime mover. There are several different electrification systems in use throughout the world. Railway electrification has many advantages but requires significant capital expenditure for installation. Characteristics of electric traction The main advantage of electric traction is a higher power-to-weight ratio than forms of traction such as diesel or steam that generate power on board. Electricity enables faster acceleration and higher tractive effort on steep gradients. On locomotives equipped with regenerative brakes, descending gradients require very little use of air brakes as the locomotive's traction motors become generators sending current back into the supply system and/or on-board resistors, which convert the excess energy to heat. Other advantages include the lack of exhaust fumes at point of use, less noise and lower maintenance requirements of the traction units. Given sufficient traffic density, electric trains produce fewer carbon emissions than diesel trains, especially in countries where electricity comes primarily from non-fossil sources.