Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction Notes Introduction 1 At the rate of publication of secondary literature on Wittgenstein no bibliography can be up­ to-date. Still relevant, however, are Lapointe, Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Comprehensive Bib­ liography, 1980; V.A. Shanker and S.G. Shanker, A Wittgenstein Bibliography, 1986; Gabel, Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Comprehensive Bibliography of International Theses and Dissertations, 1988; Frongia and McGuinness, Wittgenstein: A Bibliographical Guide, 1990; Philipp, Bibliographie zur Wittgenstein-Literatur, 1996. 2 Such quantitative research must, of course, be well defined in the terminology of research methods. For example, the adage "on Wittgenstein" should be clarified. Does any text that mentions Wittgenstein merit inclusion in the research? Or does Wittgenstein have to be the obvious object and focus of the text? And what about chapters in books, footnotes that re­ fer to Wittgenstein, or use of Wittgensteinian catchwords ("language-games," "form of life," "language as use")? These difficulties must be addressed before one can begin to sum up the on-Wittgenstein oeuvre. 3 The two outstanding anthologies are Shanker, Ludwig Wittgenstein: Critical Assessments, Vol. 1-5, and Canfield, The Philosophy ofWittgenstein, Vol. 1-15. 4 E.g., Copi and Beard, eds., Essays on Wittgenstein's Tractatus; Arrington and Glock, eds., Wittgenstein and Quine; Pitcher, ed., Wittgenstein, The Philosophical Investigations: A Collection of Critical Essays. 5 E.g., Block, ed., Perspectives on the Philosophy ofWittgenstein; Griffiths, ed., Wittgenstein: Centenary Essays; Vesey, ed., Understanding Wittgenstein; Winch, ed., Studies in the Phi­ losophy ofWittgenstein. 6 I will have more to say on the question of interpretation in general and "legitimate interpre­ tation" in particular in Part I. 7 The term "story," with the concomitant threesome (plot, hero, time), is taken from the study of narrative. See especially Paul Ricouer's analysis of narrative, as propounded in Time and Narrative. 199 200 NOTES 8 Hacker, Wittgenstein's Place in Twentieth-century Analytic Philosophy, p. ix, x. 9 The doing of interpretation does, sometimes, rare times, involve a certain recounting of past doings, but this is rarely a story of interpretation; at most it may be a chapter in the story. Such are, e.g., Williamson, "Recent Canadian Work on Wittgenstein: 1980-1989," and Stem, "Review Essay: Recent Work on Wittgenstein, 1980-1990," which are this side of storytelling, as opposed to purely bibliographical listings and reportage. 10 See, especially Canfield, The Philosophy of Wittgenstein, Vol. 9, The Private Language Argument. 11 A very partial story does subsist in Stem's "Review Essay: Recent Work on Wittgenstein, 1980-1990," in Section 2: Recent Work on Rule-Following. 12 And I do not here engage in the explicit historical game of finding the real origin, Le., of looking into the question of whether Wittgenstein was the first, really the first, to use the word, or phrase, or expression. When I say "Wittgensteinian in origin" I speak of a con­ sensual recognition of the Wittgensteinian use as being at a crucial, first junction. 13 In Part I, I will address the issues of interpretation: what is interpretation as differentiated from analysis and application, what are the limits of interpretation, what is legitimate in­ terpretation, and what is, most emphatically, overinterpretation. 14 Nevertheless, two philosophers that compete with Wittgenstein in their "vulnerability" to extremes of inconsistent interpretations are Rousseau and Nietzsche. 15 Mundle puts it sharply, when referring to only one instance of such inconsistency, Pitcher's anthology (Wittgenstein, The Philosophical Investigations): " If, in some future age, a phi­ losopher should come across Pitcher's anthology but not Wittgenstein's book, he would .. .infer that if the authors of these essays are discussing a single book called 'The Philosophical Investigations', they must be referring to different editions involving radical revisions." A Critique of Linguistic Philosophy, p. 4. 16 Von Wright, "A Biographical Sketch," in Malcolm, Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir, p. 20. 17 Letter from Alfred Kazin to his son Michael Kazin, in 1984, quoted in Dissent magazine, Fa111998. 18 I do not intend to go into the nuances and intricacies of hyper-exact labels of the philoso­ phical and cultural milieus we inhabit - especially in academia. That there are now philosophical schools espousing post-postmodemism, or that postmodernism is now con­ sidered passe by some pedants, is not relevant to my intentionally broad labeling. Chapter 1 1 I say "a" story rather than "the" story for the very express reason that this is not the only possible story. Indeed, we should welcome the telling of several such stories, each high­ lighting a different plot and thereby illuminating a different meaning to Wittgenstein interpretation. I only hope that it is, in its way, a unique story. 2 The list of books addressing the construct of interpretation (rather than engaging in the activ­ ity of interpretation) in the past two decades runs to the hundreds. This may be seen as a modem, or even postmodem, reincarnation of the classical interest in hermeneutics leaning on the theoretical rebirth of the subject in the nineteenth century with Schleiermacher. Suf­ fice it, for us, to adopt the phrase "the interpretive tum" in order to characterize the present focus on ways of reading. See Hiley, Bohman, Shusterman, eds., The Interpretive Tum: Philosophy, Science, Culture. 3 Hintikka, "An Impatient Man and His Papers". NOTES 201 4 See, e.g., Nyiri, "Ludwig Wittgenstein as a Conservative Philosopher"; Schulte, "Wittgen­ stein and Conservatism". 5 Beyond psychology and philosophy there is, of course, the classical (and post-classical) debate concerning the issue of authorial intent, and authorial authority, in literary studies, which is both too deep and too wide to merely touch upon here, while we still adopt a clear stand: "But the text is there, and the empirical author has to remain silent" (Eco, "Between Author and Text"). 6 These conundrums, concerning the relations between personal circumstances, affinities, and traits and a philosopher's philosophy, are recently, and admirably, addressed in Klagge, ed., Wittgenstein: Biography and Philosophy. Asking these questions explicitly are think­ ers such as Monk ("Philosophical Biography: The Very Idea"), who sees biography as a genre specifically suited to achieving Wittgensteinian understanding, and Conant ("Phi­ losophy and Biography"), who, while showing that philosophical biography (as "a mode of representation of the life of an individual philosopher that aspires to facilitate the under­ standing of that individual qua philosopher") is possible, ends his article with the irony that "[t]here are however, may worthwhile ways to spend your time other than reading phi­ losophical biography" (p. 42). Other articles in that volume may provide a refutation of, or, at the least, raise misgivings about our ability to delimit "philosophical" interpretation. 7 This is somewhat reminiscent of the Hegelian threesome, art, religion and philosophy as being different paths to the same goal of understanding, taken to a multiplicity more in keeping with the signs of current times. 8 For a different perspective on the relevance of Wittgenstein' s own comments on reading for reading Wittgenstein, see Nordmann, "The Sleepy Philosopher: How to Read Wittgen­ stein's Diaries". Nordmann points out that Wittgenstein could have been taken to lead us to his diaries (and notebooks, and correspondence) as evidence for understanding his phi­ losophy; on the other hand, he should be taken seriously as telling us that his philosophical remarks are clear as they stand, with no demands for interpretively unearthing philosophi­ cal doctrines. 9 Eco, The Role of the Reader. 10 Rorty, "The Pragmatist's Progress". 11 Light can also be thrown on the connection between use and interpretation by mention of Wittgenstein's "influence" on a philosopher's thought. This aspect of Wittgenstein's re­ ception in the philosophical community was canvassed in a special issue of Philosophical Investigations (vol. 24/2, 2001), on occasion of Wittgenstein's 50th Iahrzeit. Several Witt­ gensteinian scholars (interpreters and users), including Cavell, Conant, Diamond, Dilman, Hacker, McGuinness, Palmer, Phillips, Rhees, Schulte, von Savigny, von Wright, and Winch, related their views of Wittgenstein' s influence on their work. 12 One outstanding hero in the interpretive-users crowd is Cavell. His interpretation of the later Wittgenstein will emerge as a definitive station in the story I tell about re-interpreting the Investigations, yet he takes his own interpretation so seriously as to implement it in his own style of doing philosophy. 13 Eco, "Overinterpreting Texts," p. 48. 14 In fact, the only place I can be blamed for a tum to that kind of overinterpretation is in my own project: I am, in a certain sense, interpreting the myriad of interpretations. But, in an­ other sense, I have denied the label of interpretation and so can barely be thought of as overinterpreting. 202 NOTES 15 How novel this family is, whether at the end of the mainline standard families or providing a contrast to any standard, is one of the questions that will occupy us in the sequel. But see Crary's introduction to The New Wittgenstein, eds., Crary and Read. 16 "Standard" and "mainline" will be interchangeable throughout. 17 See especially Moyal-Sharrock, "The Third Wittgenstein,
Recommended publications
  • Rethinking Fideism Through the Lens of Wittgenstein's Engineering Outlook
    University of Dayton eCommons Religious Studies Faculty Publications Department of Religious Studies 2012 Rethinking Fideism through the Lens of Wittgenstein’s Engineering Outlook Brad Kallenberg University of Dayton, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/rel_fac_pub Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Other Religion Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons eCommons Citation Kallenberg, Brad, "Rethinking Fideism through the Lens of Wittgenstein’s Engineering Outlook" (2012). Religious Studies Faculty Publications. 82. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/rel_fac_pub/82 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Religious Studies at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religious Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Note: This is the accepted manuscript for the following article: Kallenberg, Brad J. “Rethinking Fideism through the Lens of Wittgenstein’s Engineering Outlook.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71, no. 1 (2012): 55-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9327-0 Rethinking Fideism through the Lens of Wittgenstein’s Engineering Outlook Brad J. Kallenberg University of Dayton, 2011 In an otherwise superbly edited compilation of student notes from Wittgenstein’s 1939 Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cora Diamond makes an false step that reveals to us our own tendencies to misread Wittgenstein. The student notes she collated attributed the following remark to a student named Watson: “The point is that these [data] tables do not by themselves determine that one builds the bridge in this way: only the tables together with certain scientific theory determine that.”1 But Diamond thinks this a mistake, presuming instead to change the manuscript and put these words into the mouth of Wittgenstein.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of One-Handed Piano Compositions
    CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE Evolution of One-Handed Piano Compositions Ignat Drozdov, BS, Mark Kidd, PhD, Irvin M. Modlin, MD, PhD Electronic searches were performed to investigate the evolution of one-handed piano com- positions and one-handed music techniques, and to identify individuals responsible for the development of music meant for playing with one hand. Particularly, composers such as Liszt, Ravel, Scriabin, and Prokofiev established a new model in music by writing works to meet the demands of a variety of pianist-amputees that included Count Géza Zichy (1849– 1924), Paul Wittgenstein (1887–1961), and Siegfried Rapp (b. 1915). Zichy was the first to amplify the scope of the repertoire to improve the variety of one-handed music; Wittgenstein developed and adapted specific and novel performance techniques to accommodate one- handedness; and Rapp sought to promote the stature of one-handed pianists among a musically sophisticated public able to appreciate the nuances of such maestros. (J Hand Surg 2008;33A:780–786. Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.) Key words Amputation, hand, history of surgery, music, piano. UCH HAS BEEN WRITTEN ABOUT the creativity of EVOLUTION OF THE PIANO: OF FINGERS AND composers and the skills of musicians, and KEYS Mspecial emphases have been placed on the Pianists are graced with a rich and remarkable history of mind and the vagaries of neurosis and even madness in their instrument, which encompasses more than 850 the process of composition. Little consideration has years of development and evolution.1 From the keyed been given to physical defects and their influence on monochord in 1157, to the clavichord (late Medieval), both music and its interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Not Beyond Language: Wittgenstein and Lindbeck on the Problem of Speaking about God Khay Tham Nehemiah Lim Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2019 Declaration I, Khay Tham Nehemiah Lim, declare that this thesis has been composed solely by myself and that it has not been submitted, in whole or in part, in any previous application for a degree. Except where stated otherwise by reference or acknowledgment, the work presented is entirely my own. Signature: ________________________ Date: ___________________ iii To Jenise whose faith in me has been unswerving and whose encouragement has helped me stay the course. My debt of gratitude to her is beyond language. iv Abstract The problem of speaking about God arises from the claim that God is utterly transcendent and is ‘wholly other’ from human or this-worldly existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Nothing Left Behind Presentation Brenna Green
    Nothing Left Behind: Pedagogical Benefits of Studying Piano Repertoire for the Left Hand Brenna R. Green – Jordan College of the Arts – Butler University The surprisingly vast and stylistically diverse repertoire for left-hand piano provides more pedagogical insight than what is seen on the surface. Because the right hand frequently commands the melodic line, students tend to be less mindful of their left hand, especially in lyrical situations. Consistent integration of intermediate to advanced piano repertoire for the left hand alone is vital to developing a student’s awareness of left-hand technique and melodic projection within highly-controlled parameters. Analysis and discussion follow of the four main categories of left-hand repertoire – anatomy and injury, showmanship, compositional challenge, and technical development, as well as an outline of significant left-hand resources and collections for teachers to create their own approach. Anatomy and Injury Often as a result of a melodic/pianistic focus on the right hand, the left hand unfortunately goes on autopilot; however, the left hand actually lends itself well to melodic and harmonic roles in left-hand writing. In these parameters, the smaller fingers are mostly relegated to harmonic accompaniment, while the pointer finger and the thumb are assigned melodic lines. The composer and virtuoso pianist Leopold Godowsky (1870-1938), often dubbed “the Apostle of the Left Hand,” strongly advocated the possibilities of the left hand: In its application to piano playing the left hand has many advantages over the right hand ... it is a fallacy to deem the left hand less adaptable to training than the right hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Claims Resolution Tribunal
    Much of the information in this case is drawn from sources that rest in the public domain. Any such information is not redacted. CLAIMS RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL In re Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation Case No. CV96-4849 Certified Denial to the Trust established for the benefit of [REDACTED 1],1 also acting on behalf of [REDACTED 2], [REDACTED 3], [REDACTED 4], [REDACTED 5], the Estate of [REDACTED 6], [REDACTED 7], [REDACTED 8], [REDACTED 9], [REDACTED 10], and [REDACTED 11] to Claimant [REDACTED 12], also acting on behalf of [REDACTED 13], [REDACTED 14], [REDACTED 15], [REDACTED 16], [REDACTED 17], [REDACTED 18], [REDACTED 19], [REDACTED 20], [REDACTED 21], [REDACTED 22], [REDACTED 23], and the Estates of [REDACTED 24], [REDACTED 25], [REDACTED 26], and [REDACTED 27], and to Claimant [REDACTED 28], all represented by Stephen M. Harnik in re Accounts of Paul Wittgenstein, Hermine Wittgenstein, Helene Salzer, Wistag AG and Wistag Partnership Claim Numbers: 224600/MC; 222470/MC; 222473/MC; 222474/MC; 222475/MC; 501790/MC 1 On 3 August 2001, Stephen M. Harnik filed claims to the published accounts of Paul and Hermine Wittgenstein in the name of [REDACTED 1] (Paul Wittgenstein’s son). Mr. Harnik did not submit a power of attorney authorizing him to act on behalf of [REDACTED 1]. The CRT therefore contacted [REDACTED 1], who, in letters dated 5 February 2002 and 29 March 2002, stated that he had not authorized the filing of these claims and did not wish to pursue them because he considered them to be without merit. In a letter to the CRT dated 26 April 2002, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • John Henry Newman and Ludwig Wittgenstein: on Certainty and Faith
    John Henry Newman and Ludwig Wittgenstein: On Certainty and Faith Ann Guinee, B.A. Thesis submitted to Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick For the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy Supervisor: Dr. Catherine Kavanagh Submitted to Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick, January, 2013 Abstract The roles of certainty and faith have been very much divided in modern times by the positions allocated them under an all-consuming positivistic account of human processes. It is ironic that this view, which stems from the Enlightenment period, a time of appreciation of the wonderful capacities and potential of the human being, has come to neglect so much of the reality of life as it is daily lived out by the person. John Henry Newman and Ludwig Wittgenstein, working from a humanist core, give a view of certainty and faith which goes a long way toward restoring the harmony of these processes by drawing our attention back to the unified starting point of all our enquiries, to what is always already there and functioning in our lived lives. What emerges from this side by side reading of Newman’s An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent and Wittgenstein’s On Certainty is firstly an organic and holistic account of how what we come to reflect on as our beliefs are formed. Secondly, similarities in their ways of seeing support Newman as a philosopher with a significant contribution to make to contemporary philosophy. Lastly, the parallel reading foregrounds the wide and often humanist scope of the religious mind-set which has the capacity to bring philosophical analysis back to a grounding in the ontological, ethical and existential concerns which give it dimension and purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Archives
    Nordic Wittgenstein Review 3 (No. 2) 2014 FROM THE ARCHIVES Alfred Schmidt [email protected] Wittgenstein and World War I: some additional online sources On January 20, 1913 Ludwig Wittgenstein’s father Karl died in Vienna, leaving his wife Leopoldine and his six living children (Hermine, Kurt, Margarethe, Helene, Paul and Ludwig) an enormous fortune. In 1910, the Austrian Finance Minister Robert Mayer created an interesting document: a confidential list of the richest inhabitants of Vienna and Lower Austria, including all persons with an annual income of more than 100,000 crowns (Sandgruber 2013). For comparison, a college professor at the time earned about 10,000 crowns a year, a school teacher about 3,000, and a servant around 300. The name of Ludwig Wittgenstein, profession “technician”, appears on this list of in all 929 people in the 254th place, with a taxed annual income of 237,308 crowns. His father Karl is ranked 38th with 807,209 crowns yearly and Ludwig’s brother Paul with 251,522 crowns is found in the 220th place. Immediately after his return from war captivity in August 1919 Ludwig gave away his paternal inheritance to his siblings Hermine, Helene and Paul, but in the six years from 1913 to 1919 he was probably one of the richest men in Austria. His donation of 100,000 crowns, distributed via Ludwig von Ficker to needy artists just before the outbreak of WW1 in 1914, is well known in the Wittgenstein literature. In her Familienerinnerungen 181 Alfred Schmidt BY-NC-SA Hermine Wittgenstein accounts for a donation by Ludwig of one million crowns for the construction of a 30 cm mortar, a donation which, however, never reached its aim (McGuinness 1988: 207; Monk 1990: 106f).
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAM NOTES Maurice Ravel
    PROGRAM NOTES Maurice Ravel - Piano Concerto for the Left Hand Composition History Ravel composed this concerto between 1929 and 1930. Paul Wittgenstein was the soloist for the first performance, on January 17, 1933, in Paris. The orchestra consists of three flutes and piccolo, two oboes and english horn, two clarinets, E-flat clarinet and bass clarinet, two bassoons and contrabassoon, four horns, three trumpets, three trombones and tuba, timpani, triangle, side drum, cymbals, bass drum, woodblock, tam-tam, harp, and strings. Performance time is approximately nineteen minutes. Performance History The Chicago Symphony Orchestra’s first subscription concert performances of Ravel’s Piano Concerto for the Left Hand were given at Orchestra Hall on February 15 and 16, 1945, with Robert Casadesus as soloist and Désiré Defauw conducting. Our most recent subscription concert performances were given on October 1, 2, and 5, 2004, with Jean-Yves Thibaudet as soloist and Charles Dutoit conducting. The Orchestra first performed this concerto at the Ravinia Festival on August 4, 1960, with John Browning as soloist and William Steinberg conducting, and most recently on July 10, 1998, with Leon Fleisher as soloist and Christoph Eschenbach conducting. Maurice Ravel Born March 7, 1875, Ciboure, France. Died December 28, 1937, Paris, France. Piano Concerto for the Left Hand Had Paul Wittgenstein’s career as a concert pianist gone according to plan, this and several other works for piano and orchestra wouldn’t exist. He was born into one of Vienna’s most remarkable families; his father, Karl, a steel, banking, and arms magnate, and his mother, Leopoldine, brought nine children into the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The House of Wittgenstein: a Family at War Free
    FREE THE HOUSE OF WITTGENSTEIN: A FAMILY AT WAR PDF Alexander Waugh | 384 pages | 30 Dec 2009 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9780747596738 | English | London, United Kingdom The House of Wittgenstein : A Family at War - - His youngest child, the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein, once asked a pupil if he had ever had any tragedies in his life. Ludwig often thought of doing so, as did his surviving brother, Paul. There were three sisters: Gretl, Helene, and Hermine. Helene was highly neurotic, and had a husband who suffered from dementia. Gretl was regarded as irritating by most people, including her unpleasant husband, who committed suicide, as did his father and one of his aunts. Bad temper and extreme nervous tension were endemic in the family. All of this was before the Nazis got to work. The Wittgenstein children were brought up as Christians, but they counted as full Jews under the Nuremberg racial laws because three of their grandparents had been born Jewish and did not convert to Christianity until they reached adulthood. The fourth, their maternal grandmother, had no Jewish ancestry. After Germany annexed Austria, inthe family money bought the lives of the three sisters—Paul had escaped, and Ludwig The House of Wittgenstein: A Family At War safe in England—but at the cost of estranging several of the surviving siblings from one another. A few days before the invasion of Poland, inHitler found the time to issue an order granting half-breed status to the Wittgenstein children, on the pretext that their paternal grandfather had been the bastard son of a German prince.
    [Show full text]
  • Shapreau Report, Austrian Marshall Plan Foundation 2014
    UC Berkeley Other Recent Work Title The Vienna Archives: Musical Expropriations During the Nazi Era and 21st Century Ramifications Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0q71b0p2 Author Shapreau, Carla Publication Date 2014-06-05 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRUZ INSTITUTE OF EUROPEAN STUDIES Dr. Carla J. Shapreau 207 MOSES HALL, MC 2316 Research associate, Institute of European Studies BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94720-2316 Lecturer, School of Law Dept. Tele: +1.510.643-5777 Tele: +1.510.849.0777 | Fax: +1.510.849.0177 URL: http://ies.berkeley.edu Email: [email protected] http://ies.berkeley.edu/contact/visitingscholars/cshapreau.html Austrian Marshall Plan Foundation Report, 2014 The Vienna Archives: Musical Expropriations During the Nazi Era and 21st Century Ramifications by Carla J. Shapreau Carved wooden violin case, German mid-18th century, initials “H.V.L.” Confiscated from Oscar Bondy, 1939, Vienna, restituted in 1948,1 and currently in the Metropolitan Museum of Fine Art Collection, New York2 1 After the 1939 confiscation of this violin case from Oscar Bondy, it was transferred to the Museum Carolino Augusteum, (the Salzburg Museum). The confiscation property card for this case states that it was returned: “übergeben 10.342/1948.” 2 Metropolitan Museum online entry: http://www.metmuseum.org/collections/search-the-collections/505302. © 2014 Carla Shapreau Table of Contents I. Introduction……………………………………………..…………...……..………...Page 3 II. The Anschluss……………………………………………...……...….……………………3 III. Jewish Asset Registrations………………………………………………...........…………5 IV. Emigration and Musical Material Culture………………..………..………………........…9 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Wittgenstein's Transcriptions for Left Hand
    PAUL WITTGENSTEIN'S TRANSCRIPTIONS FOR LEFT HAND: PIANISTIC TECHNIQUES AND PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS, A LECTURE RECITAL, TOGETHER WITH THREE RECITALS OF SELECTED WORKS OF R. SCHUMANN, S. PROKOFIEV, F. LISZT, M. RAVEL, AND F. CHOPIN Won-Young Kong, B.Mus., M.M. APPROVED: Major Professor Minor Professor Commi ember Dean o e Co ge f Music Dean of the Robert B.'Toulouse School of Graduate Studies 377 PAUL WITTGENSTEIN'S TRANSCRIPTIONS FOR LEFT HAND: PIANISTIC TECHNIQUES AND PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS, A LECTURE RECITAL, TOGETHER WITH THREE RECITALS OF SELECTED WORKS OF R. SCHUMANN, S. PROKOFIEV, F. LISZT, M. RAVEL, AND F. CHOPIN DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the University of North Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF MUSICAL ARTS By Won-Young Kong, B.Mus., M.M. Denton, Texas August, 1999 Kong, Won-Young, Paul Wittgenstein's transcriptions for left hand: pianistic techniques and performance problems, a lecture recital, together with three recitals of selected works of R. Schumann, S. Prokofiev, F. Liszt, M. Ravel, and F. Chopin. Doctor of Musical Arts (Performance), August, 1999, 85 pp, 3 tables, 76 examples, bibliography, 56 titles. Paul Wittgenstein (1887-1961) made significant contributions to the piano literature for the left hand through numerous commissioned works as well as his own transcriptions. In the transcriptions, Wittgenstein preserved the texture of two-hand music, aiming for the simulation of the original works. This requires special techniques in the performance by the left hand alone. This dissertation investigates technical means and performance problems associated with the transcriptions as well as Wittgenstein's own recordings of selections from his works.
    [Show full text]
  • A World Without Time: the Forgotten Legacy of Godel and Einstein Palle Yourgrau 2005 It Is a Widely Known but Little Appreciated
    A World Without Time: The Forgotten Legacy of Godel and Einstein Palle Yourgrau 2005 It is a widely known but little appreciated fact that Albert Einstein, the twentieth century's greatest physicist, and Kurt Godel, its greatest logician, were best friends for the last decade and a half of Einstein's life. They walked home together from Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study every day; they shared ideas about physics, philosophy, politics, and the lost world of German-Austrian science in which they had grown up. What is not widely known is the discovery that grew out of this friendship. In 1949 Godel published a paper proving that there exist possible worlds described by the theory of relativity in which time, as we ordinarily understand it, does not exist. He went further: if it is absent from those theoretical universes, he showed, time does not exist in our world either. Einstein's great work has not explained time, as most physicists and philosophers think, but explained it completely away. Einstein recognized Godel's paper as "an important contribution to the general theory of relativity." Physicists since then have tried without success to find an error in Godel's physics or a missing element in relativity itself that would rule out world models like Godel's. Stephen Hawking went so far as to propose an ad hoc modification of the laws of natureóa "chronology protection conjecture"óspecifically to negate Godel's contribution to relativity. Philosophers have been largely silentóand their silence, says Yourgrau, is one of the intellectual scandals of the past century.
    [Show full text]