PAK: Power Transmission Enhancement Investment Program

Resettlement Plan

Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan for D.G. Khan Document Stage: Final Project Number: 37192 November 2007

PAK: Power Transmission Enhancement Investment Program – Tranche 2

Prepared by National Transmission and Despatch Company

The land acquisition and resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

Pakistan - Power Transmission Enhancement Program MFF Tranche 2

Subproject No. 5 New D.G. Khan 500kV Sub-Station and Transmission Line

Short Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan

National Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC) GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

November 30, 2007 Power Transmission Enhancement Program

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AbbreviationsH ...... ivH

DefinitionH of Terms ...... vH

ExecutiveH Summary...... viH

1.H INTRODUCTION ...... 1H

1.1H Background ...... 1H

1.2H Description of the Subproject ...... 1H

2.H PROJECT COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION FRAMEWORK...... 4H

2.1H Pakistan’s Law and Regulations on Land Acquisition and Resettlement ...... 4H

2.2H ADB’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy ...... 5H

2.3H Comparison of Pakistan Land Acquisition Act and ADB Resettlement Policy 5H

2.4H Remedial Measures to Bridge the Gap ...... 6H

2.5H Legislation Relevant to Land Classification ...... 6H

2.6H Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements for the Project ...... 6H

2.7H Eligibility...... 8H

2.8H Compensation Entitlements...... 8H

2.9H Assessment of Compensation Unit Values ...... 10H

3.H IMPACTS ASSESSMENT...... 12H

3.1H Minimization of Impacts...... 12H

3.2H Resettlement Surveys...... 12H

3.3H Impacts of Substation...... 12H

3.4H Impacts of Transmission Line...... 13H

3.5H Affected Households...... 18H

3.6H Impacts on Public Land and Infrastructure ...... 19H

4.H SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF AFFECTED PEOPLE...... 21H

4.1H Census of Affected Households ...... 21H

4.2H Data on Heads of Affected Households ...... 22H

4.3H Data on Affected Households and Population...... 22H

5.H INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ...... 25H

5.1H National Transmission and Dispatch Company...... 25H

5.2H District Government...... 26H

5.3H Other Agencies and Institutions...... 27H

5.4H Responsibility for Internal and External Monitoring ...... 28H

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page i Power Transmission Enhancement Program

6.H CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSURE...... 29H

6.1H Consultation Undertaken for the LARP ...... 29H

6.2H Compensation Options Discussed ...... 30H

6.3H LARP Disclosure...... 31H

7.H GRIEVANCE REDRESS PROCESS ...... 32H

8.H BUDGET FOR LAND AND ASSET ACQUISITION ...... 33H

8.1H Basis for Compensation ...... 33H

8.2H Determining the Rate of Land for Sub-Station...... 33H

8.3H Determining the Rates for Compensation ...... 33H

8.4H Budget for Land and Asset Acquisition...... 36H

9.H IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ...... 38H

10.H MONITORING AND EVALUATION ...... 40H

10.1H Internal Monitoring...... 40H

10.2H External Monitoring...... 41H

10.3H Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation ...... 41H

10.4H Resettlement Databank...... 41H

10.5H Reporting Requirements...... 42H

APPENDICESH

AppendixH 1: Working Tables...... 44H

AppendixH 2: List of Participants in Consultation Sessions...... 51

AppendixH 3: Draft Public Information Brochure ...... 52H

AppendixH 4: Terms of Reference for External Monitoring (Consultant/NGO)...... 59H

FIGURES

FigureH 1.1: Aerial View of Location of D.G. Khan 500kV Sub-Station ...... 2H Figure 3.1 Photograph Showing Clearance Under 500kV Tower...... 13 Figure 5.1: LAR Organogram and Actions...... 26

FigureH 5.2: Organization of District Land Acquisition Collector Office ...... 26H

FigureH 5.3: Organization of Land Acquisition Steering Committee ...... 27H

FigureH 5.4: Organization of Land Acquisition Coordination Committee ...... 28H

TABLES

TableH 2.1: Pakistan and ADB Land Acquisition Policies...... 5H

TableH 2.2: Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements Matrix...... 7H

TableH 3.1: Types of Land Traversed Over by Transmission Line...... 13

TableH 3.2: Resettlement Impacts of Towers on Private Farmlands...... 15H

TableH 3.3: Distribution of TL Corridor* by Type of Land ...... 16H

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page ii Power Transmission Enhancement Program

TableH 3.4: Resettlement Impacts of TL Corridor* Private Farmlands ...... 16H

TableH 3.5: Area of Land Temporarily Affected Type of Line and Village ...... 16H

TableH 3.6: Total Area of Affected Crops by Type of Land ...... 17H

TableH 3.7: Affected Fruit and Wood Trees by Type of Line ...... 17

TableH 3.8: Percentage of Crop Loss by Affected Households...... 18

TableH 3.9: Affected Households by Towers and TL Corridor...... 18H

TableH 3.10: Location and Number of Affected Households...... 19H

TableH 3.11: Public Land & Infrastructure Traversed by 500 kV Transmission Line...... 20H

TableH 4.1: Affected Households and Population by Affected Village...... 21H

TableH 4.2: Average Size Affected Households...... 22H

TableH 4.3: Gender Composition of Affected Households ...... 22H

TableH 4.4: Age and Gender Composition of AHs ...... 23H

TableH 4.5: Farm Size of Affected Households...... 23H

TableH 4.6: Involvement of AHs by Gender in Income Sectors...... 23H

TableH 4.7: Sector-Wise Average Incomes by Gender of Affected Households ...... 24H

TableH 4.8: Monthly per Capita Income of Affected Households ...... 24H

TableH 4.9: Literacy Rate of AHs by Gender of Persons...... 24H

TableH 6.1: Participants in Group Discussions and Consultations ...... 29H

TableH 7.1: Grievance Resolution Process ...... 32H

TableH 8.1: Average Crop Income in D. G. Khan Subproject Area ...... 34H

TableH 8.2: Compensation for Trees Affected ...... 35

TableH 8.3: Estimated Resettlement Cost ...... 37H

TableH 9.1: Implementation Schedule...... 39H

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page iii Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank AH Affected household AP Affected Person CBC Citizen Community Board CBO Community Based Organization RFS Resettlement Field Surveys D.G. Khan Dera Ghazi Khan (a south-western district of Punjab Province in Pakistan) DOR District Officer Revenues EHV Extra-High Voltage (Division of NTDC) EMA External Monitoring Agency GRC Grievance Redress Committee GSC Grid System Construction (department of EHV/NTDC) GSO Sub-Station Operation (department of EHV/NTDC) IMO Independent monitoring organization IPDF Indigenous Peoples Development Framework IPDP Indigenous Peoples Development Plan kanal unit of land measurement: 1 kanal = 20 marlas (8 kanal = 1 acre) kV kilo-Volt LAA Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (amended) LAC Land Acquisition Collector LARF Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan LARU Land Acquisition and Resettlement Unit (NTDC) marla smallest unit of land measurement: 1 marla = 272.25 ft2 (= 25.31 m2) MOWP Ministry of Power and Water MRM Management Review Meeting NGO Non-governmental organization NTDC National Transmission and Dispatch Company PMU Project Management Unit PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance RFS Resettlement filed survey ROW Right-of-Way Rs. Pakistani rupees (currency): Rs. 60.90 = US$1.00 TOR Terms of Reference WAPDA Water and Power Development Authority (Pakistan)

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page iv Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Definition of Terms Affected Persons (APs) mean all the people affected by the project through land acquisition, relocation, or loss of incomes and includes any person, household (sometimes referred to as project affected family or affected household [AH]), firms, or public or private institutions. AHs/APs therefore include; i) persons affected directly by the safety corridor, right-of-way, tower or pole foundations or construction work area; (ii) persons whose agricultural land or other productive assets such as trees or crops are affected; (iii) persons whose businesses are affected and who might experience loss of income due to the project impact; (iv) persons who lose work/employment as a result of project impact; and (v) people who lose access to community resources/property as a result of the project. Compensation means payment in cash or kind for an asset to be acquired or affected by a project at replacement cost at current market value. Cut-off-date means the date after which people will NOT be considered eligible for compensation i.e. they are not included in the list of AHs as defined by the census. Normally, the cut-off date is the date of the resettlement surveys. Encroachers mean those people who move into the project area after the cut-off date and are therefore not eligible for compensation or other rehabilitation measures provided by the project. Entitlement means the range of measures comprising cash or kind compensation, relocation cost, income rehabilitation assistance, transfer assistance, income substitution, and relocation which are due to /business restoration which are due to AHs, depending on the type and degree nature of their losses, to restore their social and economic base. Land acquisition means the process whereby a person is compelled by a public agency to alienate all or part of the land s/he owns or possesses, to the ownership and possession of that agency, for public purposes, in return for fair compensation. The land acquisition and resettlement plan is known as LARP. Non-titled means those who have no recognizable rights or claims to the land that they are occupying and includes people using private or state land without permission, permit or grant i.e. those people without legal title to land and/or structures occupied or used by them. ADB’s policy explicitly states that such people cannot be denied compensation. Poor means those falling below the official national poverty line (equivalent to 2,350 calories per day) of Rs 848.79 per person per month (2004). Replacement cost means the method of valuing assets to replace the loss at current market value, or its nearest equivalent, and is the amount of cash or kind needed to replace an asset in its existing condition, without deduction of transaction costs or for any material salvaged. Resettlement Field Surveys means the detailed inventory of losses that is completed after detailed design and marking of project boundaries on the ground and includes socioeconomic data on the affected households/families, and stakeholder consultations. Sharecropper means the same as tenant cultivator or tenant farmer, and is a person who cultivates land they do not own for an agreed proportion of the crop or harvest. Significant impact means 200 people or more will experience major impacts, which are defined as; (i) being physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing ten per cent or more of their productive assets (income generating). Vulnerable people means any people who might suffer disproportionately or face the risk of being marginalized from the effects of resettlement and includes; (i) female-headed households with dependents; (ii) disabled household heads; (iii) poor households (within the meaning given previously); (iv) landless; (v) elderly households with no means of support; (vi) households without security of tenure; (vii) ethnic minorities; and (viii) marginal farmers (with landholdings of five acres or less).

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page v Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Executive Summary 1. The Subproject. The Dera Ghazi Khan subproject to be implemented under Tranche 2 of the Power Transmission Enhancement Program includes the construction of a new 500 kV Sub-Station in Dera Ghazi Khan District (Punjab) and 21.4 km of 500 kV transmission line (TL) passing through the Aaliwala, Paigan and Gadai villages in the D.G. Khan district. The Sub- Station will be constructed on a part of an unused provincial government land located 11 km from Dera Ghazi Khan town on Sakhi Sarwar Road. No impacts will occur on this component. The TL component will involve the construction of 67 towers, of which 60 will be located on private land, and 7 on government land; no permanent land acquisition will be necessary for this component as the impacts will be limited to the loss of crops and trees. The resettlement survey undertaken on the proposed 50m wide corridor of the TL identified a total of 64 affected households (AHs) with a total population of 805 persons (AHs) who will experience the loss of agricultural crops (wheat in winter and/or cotton in summer) and some 542 trees (122 fruit and 420 wood trees). In accordance with these impacts i.e. minor magnitude only, a Short Land Acquisition & Resettlement Plan (LARP) has been prepared for this subproject. Compensation and rehabilitation for the subproject impacts will be provided in accordance to the following Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements Matrix. Table 1: Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements Matrix

Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged Squatters crops/trees as per item below Land for land compensation with plots of equal value and productivity to the plots lost; or cash for affected land at replacement cost based on market Farmer/Titleholder value a plus 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge and free of taxes, registration, and transfer costs Renewal of lease in plots of equal value/productivity of plots lost, or Cash equivalent All adverse effects Leaseholder to market value of gross yield of affected land for on land use (registered or not) Arable Land the remaining lease years (up to a maximum of 3 independent of years). severity of impact Cash compensation equal to market value of lost Sharecroppers harvest share once (temporary impact) or twice (registered or not) (permanent impact) Agricultural Cash indemnity equal to salary (including portions workers in kind) for remaining part of agricultural year. 1 rehabilitation allowance equal to market value of Squatters 1 gross harvest (additional to crop compensation) for land use loss.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page vi Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Asset Specification Affected People Compensation Entitlements 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value Farmer/Titleholder of gross harvest of affected land for 1 year Leaseholder (inclusive of winter and summer crop and additional to standard crop compensation) Additional for Sharecroppers 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value Arable Land severe impacts (registered or not) of harvest share (additional to standard crop (>10% of land loss) compensation) 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross harvest of the affected land for 1 year Squatters (inclusive of winter and summer crop and additional to standard crop compensation) Land x land through provision of plots comparable in value/location to plot lost; or cash for affected Titleholder land at full replacement cost free of taxes, Residential/ registration, transfer costs plus 15% compulsory Commercial acquisition surcharge. Land Renter/Leaseholder 1-3 months allowance Accommodation in a government resettlement Squatters area or a self-relocation allowance All relevant APs Cash compensation at replacement rate for (including affected structure/other fixed assets free of Houses and squatters) salvaged materials, depreciation or transaction Structures costs. For partial impacts full cash assistance to restore remaining structure. All APs (also Crop compensation in cash at full market rate for squatters) one harvest (either winter or summer) by default for impacts caused by tower bases and perimeter, Crops Crops affected stringing and access. All other crop losses will be compensated at market rates based on actual losses. All APs also Cash compensation shall reflect income Trees Trees affected squatters) replacement All APs (including Business owner: (i) Cash compensation equal to 1 squatters) year income, if loss permanent; (ii) cash compensation for the period of business Business Loss of business or interruption, if loss is temporary. Employment employment Worker/employee: lost wages indemnity for the business interruption period up to a 3 months maximum. Transport, All APs so affected Provision of sufficient allowance to cover transport Relocation transition costs expenses and livelihood expenses for one month. Rehabilitation/substitution of affected Community structures/utilities (i.e. mosques, roads, schools etc. AP below poverty Vulnerable AP Employment priority in project-related jobs. line

2. Significance of Impact. As there is no restriction on access to, or use of, land, there will be no permanent loss of land. No houses or shops nor any community structures will be affected. Therefore there are no AHs that will experience significant impacts. 3. Indigenous People Issues. All AHs are Muslim and ethnically Siraiki. There are neither tribal nor minority people amongst the 64 AHs. The ADB’s Policy on Indigenous People, as specified in the Indigenous Peoples Development Framework (IPDF) prepared for the program is not triggered, and therefore neither an IPDP nor special action is required for this subproject.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page vii Power Transmission Enhancement Program

4. Participatory Land Acquisition Process. The program’s LARF has been translated into Urdu and disclosed according to ADB’s public communications policy, it has also been uploaded to ADB’s website. For the preparation of this LARP, consultation has been undertaken, on behalf of NTDC, through a series of meetings with local government agencies, AHs, as well as wider community group meetings of both men and women. There was a participatory process, with the head of household assisting in the identification and calculation of losses. Further consultation will be required during the implementation of the LARP. 5. Grievance Mechanism. There is also a process established to deal with any issues or concerns raised on any aspect of the LARP or compensation process. The verbal or written grievances of AHs will be heard by the district level Land Acquisition Coordinating Committees (LACCs), which will be established to assist NTDC implement the LARP. 6. Cost of Plan. The budget has been established using the rates derived through consultation. The costs for compensation for the 64 AHs and external monitoring (including the administration charge of 10 per cent and a contingency of 10 per cent) are Rs. 80.31 million (US$ 1.32 million). This is inclusive of the cost of 41 ha of land to be purchased for the Sub-Station from the Forest Department, Government of Punjab.

Table 2: Cost of D. G. Khan LARP

No. Resettlement Activity No. Unit Rs./Unit Total Rs. A. Asset Compensation - - - 64,716,290 A.1 Land Purchase from Government (for Grid Stn.): 41 ha 50,642,175 A.2 Compensation for Affected Trees: 542 tree - 3,189,750 A.3 Compensation for Affected Crops: 948,207 m2 - 10,884,365 B. Other Resettlement Related Activities: - - - 1,818,901 B.1 Rehabilitation of Affected Lands/Structures 864,835 m2 0.60 518,901 B.2 Resettlement Specialist (impl.) 3.00 pers/mo 300,000 900,000 B.3 External monitoring 1.00 pers/mo 300,000 300,000 B.4 Training of NTDC staff (incl. materials) 1.00 lumpsum 100,000 100,000 C. Administration Costs (10% of Compensations) 0.10 lumpsum 64,716,290 6,471,629 D. Contingency (10%) 0.10 lumpsum 73,006,820 7,300,682 Total Amount (Pak. Rupees): - - - 80,307,502 Total Amount (US Dollars*): - - - 1,318,678 * US$ 1.00 = Rs. 60.90.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page viii Power Transmission Enhancement Program

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background 1. The Government of Pakistan (the Government) has requested (since approved and loan agreement signed in January 2007) financing from Asian Development Bank (ADB) for implementing the Power Transmission Enhancement Investment Program (the program) to be executed through a Multi-tranche Financial Facility (MFF) divided into four tranches and with the Ministry of Water and Power and the National Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC) as the Executing Agency (EA) and the Implementing Agency (IA) respectively. Each tranche will constitute a project which, in turn, will be divided into several subprojects involving the construction/upgrading of transmission lines and construction of sub-stations where required. 2. This Short Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) for New D. G. Khan 500kV Sub-Station and Transmission Lines Subproject (the Subproject), one of the subprojects under tranche 2 of the MFF program, has been prepared by NTDC to comply with the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework (LARF) prepared for the program as a whole. As such the Subproject will have to fit the following LAR- related implementation conditions: • Signing of contracts awards for the Subproject’s civil works will be contingent 1 to the preparation of a LARP fitting the LARF and ADB relevant polices F ; • ADB issuance of notice to proceed for the implementation of the subproject’s civil works will be contingent to the full implementation of the compensation and rehabilitation programs detailed in this LARP. 3. This LARP is based on final line alignments/tower positions and fully fits the provisions of the LARF already prepared. As required by the LAR-related conditionalities for the program the LARF has been reviewed but it was not modified as the subprojects under tranche 2 require the same LAR approach as the projects under tranche 1. 4. As noted in the LARF and based on OM section F2/OP & BP (2003) when impacts are considered significant i.e. >200 AHs resettled or suffering >10% income losses, a subproject is classified as category “A” and a full LARP is to be prepared. Conversely, when losses are minor or no significant [<200 AH resettled or suffering <10% income losses], a subproject is classified as category “B” and only a short LARP is to be prepared. Due to the number of people affected (64 AHs/805 AHs) and impact magnitude (minor only), this document has been prepared following the short LARP format. 1.2 Description of the Subproject 5. The subproject will be located 11 km from D. G. Khan town on Sakhi Sarwar Road, as shown on Figure 1.1. The subproject will involve the installation of one 500kV outdoor substation that will be known as “New D. G. Khan 500 kV Substation”. The new sub station will include 2 x 600MVa 500/220 kV power transformers, 2 x 250 MVA 220/132 kV power transformers, and allied equipment. The sub station will be interconnected by means of a 21.4 km 500 kV line to the existing 500 kV Guddu to Multan TL, including 18 km of double circuit section and two single circuit sections to connect to the proposed substation and to the existing 500 kV transmission line.

1 ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (1995) and Operations Manual (OM) Section F2/OP & BP (2003).

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 1

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Figure 1.1: Aerial View of Location of D.G. Khan 500kV Sub-Station

6. Dera Ghazi Khan and its neighboring towns form a load centre with rapidly growing demand for electrical energy. This area lies between Muzafergarh and northern Loralai and Barkhan Districts of Baluchistan province, with its electricity supply is managed by Multan Electric Power Company (MEPCO) whose average annual load growth is about 8%. The electricity load from Dera Ghazi Khan and neighboring area is supplied through a 132 kV sub-transmission network. 7. The load flow studies and technical analysis show that without the construction of the proposed 500 kV sub-station and associated TL, the stability of the Baluchistan system cannot be ensured , the proposed 220 kV TL from the new 500 kV D. G. Khan will provide alternative supply to northern Baluchistan and averts the possibility of voltage collapse. Therefore the proposed subproject will ensure the stability of the Baluchistan system and also provide support to the 220/132 kV network of MEPCO. 8. The new 500kV substation will be constructed on 41 ha of unused land currently owned by the provincial government of Punjab. The site is located 11 km from D. G. Khan town towards the west on Sakhi Sarwar Road, leading to Quetta via Fort Monroe. At the start of the new TL, there will be two single circuit lines of a total

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 2

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

length of 3.37 km to connecting in and out of the parent 500kV Guddu – Multan line passing by Aaliwala village towards south of D. G. Khan town. There will also be a 21.4 km double and single circuit transmission line to connect to the New D. G. Khan 500 kV Sub-Station. These lines will be supported by a total 67 towers. The TLs traverse an entirely agro-rural area and will not require any permanent land acquisition, instead farmers will be compensated for lost crops and trees caused by the construction of towers and stringing of the TL. 9. The estimated total cost of the planned works under the Subproject is Rs. 3.804 billion or $62.46 million. The total land acquisition and resettlement cost of this subproject is estimated at Rs. 80.31 million or US$1.32 million (2.1% of the total Subproject cost).

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 3

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

2. PROJECT COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION FRAMEWORK 10. This section compares the Pakistani laws and regulations on land acquisition and resettlement with the requirements of the ADB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement and summarizes the main components of the policy framework prepared specifically for the Project to ensure that ADB’s policy on involuntary resettlement is complied with (refer to Section 2.4). 2.1 Pakistan’s Law and Regulations on Land Acquisition and Resettlement 11. The 1894 Land Acquisition Act (LAA) with its successive amendments is the main law regulating land acquisition for public purpose. The LAA has been variously interpreted by local governments, and some province has augmented the LAA by issuing provincial legislations. The LAA and its Implementation Rules require that following an impacts assessment/valuation effort, land and crops are compensated in cash at market rate to titled landowners and registered land tenants/users, respectively. The LAA mandates that land valuation is to be based on the latest 5-3 years average registered land sale rates, though, in several recent cases the median rate over the past year, or even the current rates, have been applied. Due to widespread land under-valuation by the Revenue Department, current market rates are now frequently used with an added 15 per cent Compulsory Acquisition Surcharge as provided in the LAA. 12. Based on the LAA, only legal owners and tenants registered with the Land Revenue Department or possessing formal lease agreements, are eligible for compensation or livelihood support. The rights of the non-titled, are however addressed under the 1986 Punjab Jinnah Abadis for Non-proprietors in Rural Areas Act which recognize to squatters the right to receive rehabilitation in form of a replacement plot. It is to be noted that this right has been sometimes extended in practice to include some form of rehabilitation in cash or in forms different from land. Projects such as Chotiari Dam, Ghazi Barotha Hydropower, and National Highways Improvement, have awarded compensation and assistance to unregistered tenants and other forms of AHs (sharecroppers/squatters). 13. It is also noted that the LAA does not automatically mandate for specific rehabilitation/assistance provisions benefiting the poor, vulnerable groups, or severely affected AHs, nor it automatically provides for rehabilitation of income/livelihood losses or resettlement costs. This however it is often done in many projects in form of ad hoc arrangements based on negotiations between a specific EA and the AHs. 14. As noted above, exceptions to the rule are intrinsic to the fact that the law is elastic and is broadly interpreted at provincial level depending on operational requirements, local needs, and socio-economic circumstances. Recourse is often taken to ad hoc arrangements, agreements and understandings for resettlement in difficult situations. The above is also influenced by the fact that an amendment of the LAA has been considered necessary by the Ministry of Environment. Accordingly, a National Resettlement Policy (NRP) and a Resettlement Ordinance have been drafted to broaden LAA provisions and current practices so as to widen the scope of eligibility and tightening up loopholes (i.e. regarding definitions of malpractices, cut- off dates, political influence on routing, etc.). But both these documents are still awaiting government’s approval for implementation.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 4

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

2.2 ADB’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy 15. The ADB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement is based on the following principles: • Involuntary resettlement is to be avoided or at least minimized. • Compensation must ensure maintenance of AHs’ pre-project living standards. • Compensation is required for any AH who as a result of a project has their access to, or use of, land restricted. • AHs should be fully informed and consulted on LAR compensation options. • AHs’ socio-cultural institutions will be supported/used as much as possible. • Compensation will be carried out with equal consideration of gender. • Lack of formal legal land title should not be a hindrance to rehabilitation. • Particular attention should be paid to households headed by women and other vulnerable groups, such as indigenous people and ethnic minorities, and appropriate assistance will be provided to help them improve their status. • LAR should be conceived and executed as a part of the project, and the full costs of compensation should be included in project costs and benefits. • Compensation/rehabilitation assistance will be paid prior to ground leveling and demolition of the affected structures. 2.3 Comparison of Pakistan Land Acquisition Act and ADB Resettlement Policy 16. The following Table 2.1 outlines differences between the Pakistani Law and ADB Resettlement Policy: Table 2.1: Pakistan and ADB Land Acquisition Policies

Pakistan’s Land Acquisition Act ADB Involuntary Resettlement Policy Land compensation only for titled landowners or Lack of title should not be a bar to compensation and/or holders of customary rights. rehabilitation. Non-title-holders are to be rehabilitated. Crop losses compensation provided only to registered Crop compensation are provided to landowners and landowners and lease/sharecrop tenants (Non- sharecrop/lease tenants according to their shares registered are often deprived). whether they are registered or not Tree losses are compensated o the basis of officially Tree losses are compensated according to actual worth fixed rates by the Forest and Horticulture of affected trees based on market rates. departments Land valuation based on the median registered land Land valuation is to be based on current replacement transfer rate over the previous 3 years. (market) value. Structures valuation based on official rates, with Valuation of structures based on current market depreciation deducted from the gross value. value/cost of new construction of the structure Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) is the only pre- Complaints and grievances are resolved informally litigation final authority to decide disputes and through community participation in the Grievance address complaints regarding Redress Committees (GRC), local governments, NGO quantification/compensation for the affected lands and/or local-level community based organizations and other assets.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 5

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

2.4 Remedial Measures to Bridge the Gap 17. In principle, the Pakistani LAA and ADB Policy adhere not only to the objective of AH compensation, but also to the objective of rehabilitation. However, the LAA is unclear on how rehabilitation is to be achieved and in practice the provision of rehabilitation is left to ad hoc arrangements taken by local governments and specific project proponents. To clarify these issues and reconcile eventual gaps between Pakistan Law and ADB Policy, the NTDC had prepared the Land Acquisition and 2 Resettlement Framework (LARF) in 2006 under tranche 1 of this program F , to ensure compensation at replacement cost of all items, the rehabilitation of informal settlers, and provision of subsidies or allowances for AHs that may be relocated, suffer business losses, or may be severely affected. Since tranche 2 is the continuation of the same Power Transmission Enhancement Program and NTDC’s approach to land acquisition and resettlement activities remains the same, the LARF prepared by NTDC for Tranche 1 is valid and applicable to the subprojects included in tranche 2. 2.5 Legislation Relevant to Land Classification 18. In terms of application of the LARF prepared for the program, identifying the type of land affected is an important step in determining eligibility for compensation for land. Jurisdiction rather than use classifies land. Rural land includes irrigated land and un-irrigated land and is governed by the Land Revenue Act (1967) which must be read in conjunction with the LAA and other legislation that may also apply, including for example the Punjab Alienation of Land Act (1900), Colonization of Government Lands Act (1912) and the various Land Reform Regulations. Rural land falls under the jurisdiction of revenue districts. 19. Land, other than rural land, is urban and including all permutations there-under such as residential, commercial, built upon and build able, and is governed by various regulations and ordinances including the People’s Local Government Ordinance (1972) for each province, Cantonments Act (1924), and Land Control Act (1952). Urban land falls under the jurisdiction of municipal and local government authorities. 20. While there are broad definitions of rural and urban land in the People’s Local Government Ordinances, such classifications are not immutable and have been, and are, changed by the Collector of Revenues and provincial governments over time. In general it is either the People’s Local Government Ordinances or the Land Revenue Act that determines the classification of land, however there are some cases where both applies and other cases where different legislation altogether can dictate jurisdiction and classification over land. Hence there is neither a universal classification nor legislation pertaining to the land that will be potentially affected under the program.

2.6 Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements for the Project 21. Land acquisition and asset (crops, trees, etc.) compensation tasks under the program, and for this D. G. Khan subproject, will be implemented according to a compensation eligibility and entitlements framework in line with Pakistan’s law/regulation and ADB Policy. In case of a difference, the ADB Policy will prevail. 22. A summary eligibility and entitlements matrix is provided in Table 2.2.

2 The program’s LARF was prepared by NTDC and endorsed and uploaded on ADB’s website in October 2006.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 6

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table 2.2: Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements Matrix

Asset Specification Affected People Compensation Entitlements No Land compensation provided that land is rehabilitated/restored to former quality following Farmer/Titleholder completion of works. Compensation, in cash, for all damaged crops and trees as per item below No Land compensation provided that the land is Access is not rehabilitated/restored to former quality following restricted and Leaseholder completion of works. Compensation, in cash, Arable Land existing or current (registered or not) for all damaged crops and trees as per item land use will below remain unchanged Sharecroppers Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged (registered or not) crops/trees as per item below Agricultural workers Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees as per item below Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged Squatters crops/trees as per item below Land for land compensation with plots of equal value and productivity to the plots lost; or cash for affected land at replacement cost based on Farmer/Titleholder market value a plus 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge and free of taxes, registration, and transfer costs Renewal of lease in plots of equal value/productivity of plots lost, or Cash Leaseholder All adverse effects equivalent to market value of gross yield of (registered or not) on land use affected land for the remaining lease years (up Arable Land independent of to a maximum of 3 years). severity of impact Cash compensation equal to market value of Sharecroppers lost harvest share once (temporary impact) or (registered or not) twice (permanent impact) Cash indemnity equal to salary (including Agricultural workers portions in kind) for remaining part of agricultural year. 1 rehabilitation allowance equal to market value Squatters of 1 gross harvest (additional to crop compensation) for land use loss. 1 severe impact allowance equal to market Farmer/Titleholder value of gross harvest of affected land for 1 Leaseholder year (inclusive of winter and summer crop and additional to standard crop compensation) Additional for Sharecroppers 1 severe impact allowance equal to market Arable Land severe impacts (registered or not) value of harvest share (additional to standard (>10% of land loss) crop compensation) 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross harvest of the affected land for 1 Squatters year (inclusive of winter and summer crop and additional to standard crop compensation) Land x land through provision of plots comparable in value/location to plot lost; or Titleholder cash for affected land at full replacement cost Residential/ free of taxes, registration, transfer costs plus Commercial 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge. Land Renter/Leaseholder 1-3 months allowance Accommodation in a government resettlement Squatters area or a self-relocation allowance Cash compensation at replacement rate for affected structure/other fixed assets free of Houses and All relevant APs salvaged materials, depreciation or transaction Structures (including squatters) costs. For partial impacts full cash assistance to restore remaining structure.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 7

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Asset Specification Affected People Compensation Entitlements Crop compensation in cash at full market rate for one harvest (either winter or summer) by default for impacts caused by tower bases and Crops Crops affected All APs (also squatters) perimeter, stringing and access. All other crop losses will be compensated at market rates based on actual losses. Cash compensation shall reflect income Trees Trees affected All APs also squatters) replacement Business owner: (i) Cash compensation equal to 1 year income, if loss permanent; (ii) cash compensation for the period of business Business Loss of business or All APs (including interruption, if loss is temporary. Employment employment squatters) Worker/employee: lost wages indemnity for the business interruption period up to a 3 months maximum. Provision of sufficient allowance to cover Transport, All APs so affected Relocation transport expenses and livelihood expenses for transition costs one month. Rehabilitation/substitution of affected Community structures/utilities (i.e. mosques, roads, schools etc. Vulnerable AP AP below poverty line Employment priority in project-related jobs.

2.7 Eligibility 23. AHs will be entitled to compensation or rehabilitation provisions under the program as follows: • All AHs affected by restricted access to, or use of, land whether they have legal title/traditional land rights or not; • Tenants and sharecroppers whether registered or not; • Owners of buildings, crops, plants, or other objects attached to land; and • AHs losing business, incomes and/or salaries.

24. Cut-off Date: Compensation eligibility will be limited by a cut-off date fixed at the 24th May 2007 for this Subproject, which was the last day of the AH inventory of losses (IOL) census and impact assessment fieldwork. Any AHs who settle in the affected areas and/or make changes in the land use patterns after this cut-off date will not be eligible for compensation. They will, however, be given sufficient advance notice requesting them to clear crops, vacate premises/corridor and dismantle affected structures/establishments (if any) prior to project implementation. They will be allowed to reuse their salvaged material for free and they will not be asked to pay any fine. Forced eviction will only be considered after all other efforts have been exhausted. 2.8 Strategy for the Compensation of Land Affected by Towers 25. Besides the amended LAA, the NTDC has adopted the Telegraph Act (1885) (as amended) for the construction and maintenance of power transmission lines. The latter Act was originally framed for the construction of telegraphic poles during the British Era and later inherited by Pakistan upon independence. This Act was subsequently adopted by WAPDA for electric poles and supply lines, and eventually passed to NTDC. However, telegraphic or electric poles cover a much smaller area of land

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 8

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

compared with transmission towers which have the potential to affect crops and grazing shrubs. The NTDC makes utmost efforts to minimize resettlement impacts, alternatively NTDC compensates affected farmers for their crop losses. 26. Thus, based on current Pakistani Law and NTDC’s practice, the land under the towers is not acquired permanently and therefore compensation is not required for land. For this Program, however, it was agreed between NTDC and ADB that the land under the tower will be acquired but would only require compensation in the case where (i) in rural areas, the tower hinders access to the land under the tower for cultivation; and/or, (ii) in urban/residential areas, the tower restricts use of the land for housing development. Based on this principle it was established that the strategy for compensation of land affected by tower construction will be different for urban/residential land (and its potential for housing development) and agricultural land. In the case of urban/residential areas, the land under towers will be considered as being permanently affected and therefore it will be acquired and compensated in full. In the case of rural areas and agricultural land, as long as the towers provide sufficient clearance to allow the continuation of crop cultivation, the land will be considered to be temporarily affected (for the duration of tower installation and stringing of the lines) and therefore will not be acquired nor compensated. However, for towers that have low- bars which would restrict the farmer’s access for cultivation activities, the land will be acquired permanently and compensated for as such. 27. The construction of towers on agricultural land however will still require the provision of compensation for crops and loss of trees, for the area under the tower plus a small perimeter surrounding it (an access and working area). The area included in the perimeter has been assessed as 900 m2 for 220 kV towers and 2,500 m2 for 500 kV towers. Furthermore, as the construction of towers involves a 3-tier process, namely: (i) preparation of the foundation; (ii) erection of the tower; and, (iii) stringing of the power cables, and this process has the potential to affect three crops, and thus, compensation for three crops will be paid to the affected farmers. 2.9 Compensation Entitlements 28. Entitlement provisions for AHs losing crops or trees i.e. not affected by restricted access to, or use of, land, will receive compensation as per the entitlement matrix. For those AHs that will have restricted access to, or use of, land, and income losses entitlement provisions will include compensation for such land losses, house and buildings losses, crops and trees losses, a relocation subsidy, and a business losses allowance based on tax declarations and/or lump sums. The entitlements are detailed below: • Agricultural land impacts will be compensated based on whether an AH’s access to or use of land is restricted. For those whose access to, and use of agricultural land is not restricted i.e. they can continue to cultivate the land, compensation will be for removed or damaged crops and trees. For AHs whose access to, and use of, agricultural land is restricted i.e. they cannot continue to cultivate the land, compensation will be at replacement value of land in: (i) cash at current market rates plus a 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge, or (ii) through replacement land equal in value/productivity to the plot lost. When >10% of an AH income or agricultural land is affected, AH (owners, leaseholders and sharecroppers) will get an additional allowance for severe impacts equal to the market value of a year’s gross yield of the land lost (inclusive of both winter and summer harvests). Eventual transaction taxes/fees will be paid by NTDC or waived off by local governments. Market rates will be assessed through a survey of prevalent land prices or income from the lost crops and tree in the subproject areas.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 9

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

• Residential/commercial land will be compensated at replacement value either (i) in the form of land for land or, (ii) cash at current market rates free of deductions for transaction costs. Renters/leaseholders will receive an allowance corresponding to a 3 months rent. • Houses, buildings, structures will be compensated in cash at replacement cost free of depreciation, salvaged materials, and transaction costs deductions. The compensation will also include the cost of lost water and electricity connections. • Crops: Cash compensation at current market rates for net harvest actually lost during one or both cropping seasons. Crop compensation will be paid both to landowners and tenants based on their lease or sharecropping agreements, • Trees: Cash compensation shall reflect income replacement (see below). • Businesses: compensation for permanent business losses will be in cash for a one-year income based on tax declaration or, if unavailable, based on the official minimum salary; compensation for temporary business will be in cash covering the income of the interruption period based on tax declaration or, unavailable, official minimum salary. • Business workers and employees: Indemnity for lost wages for the period of business interruption up to a maximum of 3 months. • Agricultural land leaseholders, sharecroppers, and workers: Where the access to, or use of, the land is restricted; affected leaseholders will receive either a renewal of the lease in other plots or cash corresponding to the yearly yield of land lost for the remaining years of the lease up to a maximum of 3 years. Sharecroppers will receive their share of harvest at market rates (if impact is temporary) plus 1 additional crop compensation (if the land is lost permanently). Agricultural workers, with contracts to be interrupted, will get an indemnity in cash corresponding to their salary in cash and kind for the remaining part of the agricultural year (inclusive of both winter and summer crop). • Relocation subsidy: AHs forced to relocate will receive a relocation subsidy sufficient to cover transport costs and living expenses for 1 month. • House renters: House renters who have leased a house for residential purposes will be provided with a cash grant of 3 months’ rent at the prevailing market rate in the area and will be assisted in identifying alternative accommodation. • Community structures and public utilities: Will be fully replaced or rehabilitated so as to satisfy their pre-project functions. • Vulnerable people livelihood: Vulnerable people (AHs below the poverty line) will be given priority in employment in project-related jobs. 2.10 Assessment of Compensation Unit Values 29. The methodology for assessing unit compensation values of different affected items is as follows: • Land shall be valued at current replacement cost based on a land sales survey in the year before the impact survey. No deductions for taxes/transaction costs will be applied.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 10

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

• Houses/buildings will be valued at replacement value based on cost of materials, type of construction, labor, transport and other construction costs. No deductions will be applied for depreciation, salvaged materials and transaction costs. • Annual crops will be valued at net market rates at the farm gate for the first year crop. In the eventuality that more than one-year compensation is due to the AHs the crops after the first will be compensated at gross market value. • Fruit trees will be valued based on age category (a. seedling; b. not yet productive; c. productive). Productive trees will be valued at gross market value of 1 year income x the number of years needed to grow a new tree with the productive potential of the lost tree.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 11

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

3. IMPACTS ASSESSMENT

3.1 Introduction 3.1.1 Minimization of Impacts 30. The NTDC attempts to take all possible steps to reduce land acquisition and minimize the likely adverse impacts on the local communities in the design and implementation of its power transmission enhancement subprojects. Accordingly, the following measures were taken to avoid and minimize the likely resettlement impacts of this Subproject: • To avoid impacts of land acquisition on the local farming community, NTDC has located the new 500 kV sub-station on state owned land. The selected site (41 ha) is part of a large area of rangeland with poor vegetation (coarse grasses and other drought resistant shrubs), there are no trees on the site. As such, this land is not used by the local communities for any economic purposes such as grazing or firewood collection; • The alignments of the transmission lines were modified at a number of locations to avoid compact housing areas and scattered farm-houses, three fruit orchards, two brick kilns, three poultry farms, and three schools; and • The design of Tower No. D-21 was modified to provide a safer distance and vertical clearance for a single farm-house with a tube-well. 31. As a result, no buildings or farming enterprises (i.e. poultry farms, crops, fruit orchards) or related structures (i.e. tube-wells, farm-houses) are affected by the substation. The transmission lines will, however, traverse agricultural land (including some un-productive or abandoned land), where crops and trees within the 50 m wide safety corridor will be affected. In summary the Subproject (sub-station and transmissions lines) will not affect any structures. 3.1.2 Resettlement Field Survey 32. The resettlement survey team, comprising one resettlement specialist, two male and one female field surveyors, along with the technical surveyor conducted the fieldwork in D. G. Khan 500 kV Subproject area from 16th to 24th May 2007. Thus, the NTDC has fixed 24th May, 2007 as the cut-off-date for this Subproject. No subsequent changes in land use pattern or construction of any structure will be entertained for any compensation or assistance under this Subproject. As a general strategy, the layout of the site and a technical drawings showing line profile with identification of tower sites were provided as pre-requisites for carrying out the resettlement field survey (RFS). The field work involved impact assessment by quantifying and costing the affected lands and other assets (crops, trees, etc.) through a participatory inventory of losses, collection of socio-economic data on AHs, and consultation with the men and women of AHs and the affected 3 communities. F 3.2 Impacts of Substation 33. The selected site for the new D. G. Khan 500 kV substation is situated about 11 km from D. G. Khan town on Sakhi Sarwar Road, and is part of a barren land. The site of 41 ha (820m x 500m) represents a small portion (5%) of an 800 ha area

3 Socio-economic survey findings are presented in Section 4 and Section 6 - Consultations and Disclosure.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 12

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

designated as rangeland and formally administered by Punjab Forest Department. Most uncultivated land, with or without forest cover, in the Punjab Province is formally administered by the Forest Department on behalf of the Provincial Government. NTDC has already initiated the process of purchase and transfer of this piece of land from the Provincial Government. 34. The selected site has poor and scanty vegetation, primarily being coarse grasses and wild shrubs, there are no trees. As such, this land not is used by the local communities for grazing, firewood collection, and/or any other economic purposes. This has been confirmed by the RFS team through consultation with the local communities as well as the Divisional Forest Officer (Rangelands). Further, it is unlikely the area could be developed for forestry or plantation as there are no water resources in proximity to the rangeland. Thus, partly as a result of protection by Forest Department and partly due to poor vegetation and lack of water, the community has not developed the land for any productive purposes such as grazing, growing crops or firewood collection. As the local community, including any non- titled people, is not using the land, there will be no adverse impacts as a result of sub-station construction. 3.3 Impacts of Transmission Line 3.3.1 General Description 35. As specified in Section 2, the strategy for the compensation of land affected by tower construction will be different for urban/residential land and rural (agricultural) land. In the case of urban or residential land the land under the tower will be considered as being permanently affected and therefore it will be acquired and compensated in full. In the case of agricultural land, as long as towers provide sufficient clearance to allow crop cultivation, the land will be considered as temporarily affected and therefore will not be acquired nor compensated. The construction of towers on agricultural land will require compensation for crops lost from the area under the tower and also in a small perimeter surrounding it. The area included in this perimeter has been assessed to be 2,500 m2 for a 500 kV tower. Finally, transmission line construction will also permanently affect all houses/structures and trees higher than 6 m both under and between towers within a 30 m corridor as this corridor needs to be cleared for safety reasons. Such houses, structures, and trees will be compensated. Crop cultivation within the corridor can continue after the stringing of lines has taken place. During stringing operations it is expected that one harvest will be lost. 36. The new D. G. Khan 500kV will be connected to the existing 500kV Guddu – Multan TL, passing by Aaliwala village adjacent to Indus Highway, by means of a 20.8 km long new line. It will traverse intensively irrigated private farmlands (91%) and across a short section of Government owned uncultivated lands (9%), as shown in Table 3.1, overleaf. No land will be acquired permanently for the TL, nevertheless, its construction and installation works will temporarily affect seasonal crops and all trees will be removed permanently (see Appendix 1: Working Tables). 37. The transmission line for this Subproject will consist of the following sections: • Line A - incoming single circuit line (1.7 km; 6 towers) to be connected to existing line. • Line B - outgoing single circuit line (1.7 km; 6 towers) to be connected to existing line. • Line D - double circuit line (17.4 km; 55 towers) to be connected to the new sub-station.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 13

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table 3.1: Types of Land Traversed by Transmission Line Length of Line (m)

Transmission Line Private Land Govt Land Total Length Percentage (Cultivated) (Uncultivated) (A) Incoming Single 1,717 10 1,727 8.3 (B) Outgoing Single 1,690 6 1,696 8.1 (D) Double Circuit 15,557 1,852 17,409 83.6 Totals: 18,964 1,868 20,832 100.0 Percentages: 91.0 9.0 100.0 --

38. Major crops grown in the area are wheat in the Rabi season (winter-spring) and cotton in the Kharif season (summer-autumn). This dominant cropping pattern of wheat-cotton rotation covers 96% of the farmlands, while sugarcane, maize/fodder and vegetables are grown on the remaining lands (4%). Thus, the Subproject’s impact assessment has been made on the basis of wheat and cotton crop loss. 39. In addition, there are three large fruit orchards, which were avoided successfully in the technical design. However, scattered trees are found along some farm boundaries, including fruit trees (date palm and mango) and wood tree species, Shisham (sisso) and Sirin or Saras (albizea lebbek) being the most common, followed by Toot (mulberry) and Kikar (acasia nicolta).. NTDC made modifications ot the TL alignment to avoid as many trees as possible. As a result, only 542 trees will need to be removed from the 50m wide corridor of the transmission line.

3.3.2 Impacts of Towers 40. The new 500kV TL will require the construction of a total 67 towers. No private or public land will be acquired permanently, as none of the towers will be constructed in an established urban or a developing housing area, and access under the tower will be maintained as the towers provide sufficient clearance for unhindered access by tractors (Figure 3.1), and thus, will allow continued and unencumbered cultivation of AHs’ lands. The farmlands under and around towers will, however, be temporarily affected by the loss of crops and trees during a 3-tier process of tower construction, namely: (i) construction of foundations, (ii) erection of towers, and (iii) stringing of power cables. The whole process is usually completed in a period of 12 to 18 months, thereby causing crop losses for up to three cropping seasons. Accordingly, cash compensation will be paid to the affected farmers for the loss of agricultural crops for three seasons.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 14

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Figure 3.1: Photograph Showing Clearance under a 500kV Tower

41. Of the total 67 towers, 60 towers will be located on private farmlands, while the remaining 7 towers will be located on uncultivated government land, near the substation site. For compensation purposes, the land affected by tower installation, includes the area under the tower and also a small perimeter surrounding the tower (for access, working and storage areas), the total area is assessed to be an average size of 2,500 m2 (0.25 ha) per tower. Thus, the 67 towers will temporarily require a total area of 167,500 m2 (16.75 ha), of which 60 towers will affect 150,000 m2 (15 ha) of private farmlands, and 7 towers will be constructed on 17,500 m2 of uncultivated government land near the sub-station site. Some 39 AHs will be affected by the construction of the 60 towers (Table 3.2). Table 3.2: Resettlement Impacts of Towers on Private Farmland

No. of Affected Area Transmission Line No. of AHs Towers m2 ha

(A) Incoming Single Circuit 5* 6 15,000 1.5 (B) Outgoing Single Circuit 5 6 15,000 1.5 (D) Double Circuit Line 29* 48** 120,000 12.0 Totals: 39 60 150,000 15.0 * One AH is affected by two towers (last tower of Line A and first tower of Line D). ** Does not include 7 towers on uncultivated government land.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 15

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

3.3.3 Impacts of Lines 42. The TL corridor will cause loss of crops during the stringing of the cables. This final activity is usually carried out quickly, one stretch at a time, and completed within one season, therefore one-crop compensation will be paid to affected farmers. No crop compensation will be paid for TL sections passing over uncultivated land. Cash compensation will also be paid for the loss or removal of their trees falling within 50m wide corridor. No built-up structures (including private houses, farm-houses, shops, and community buildings, graveyards, etc.) are affected, and thus, no compensation and/or financial assistance is required for these purposes. 43. Tables 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 show the total length of TL corridor (excluding the land under the towers) is 17.48 km, with a total affected area of 87.41 ha. Of the total TL corridor, over 91% of the length will traverse private farmlands and 9% over uncultivated government land. As a result, some 25 AH (39.1%) of the total 64 AH will be affected temporarily by the TL corridor during the stringing activity,

Table 3.3: Distribution of TL Corridor* by Type of Land

Length of TL Corridor (m) Affected Area (m2) Transmission Line Private Uncultivated Private Uncultivated Farmland Govt Land Farmland Govt Land (A) Incoming Single 1,417 10 70,850 500 (B) Outgoing Single 1,390 6 69,500 300 (D) Double Circuit 13.157 1,502 657,850 75,100 Total 15,964 1,518 798,200 75,900 * The land falling in-between the towers (excluding the 2,500m2 plots under each tower).

Table 3.4: Resettlement Impacts of TL Corridor* Private Farmlands Total Number of Affected Area Transmission Line (m)Length Ahs 2 (m) m ha (A) Incoming Single Circuit 12 1,417 70,850 7.09 (B) Outgoing Single Circuit 7 1,390 69,500 6.95 (D) Double Circuit Line 45 13,157 657,850 65.78 Total: 64 15,964 798,200 79.82 * The 50m wide strip of land under the power cable falling in-between the towers.

Table 3.5: Area of Crop Temporarily Affected by Village

Area of crop (ha) Transmission Line Aaliwala Paigan Gadai Total

Line A (Incoming Single: 6 towers) 8.83 - - 8.83 Line B (Outgoing Single: 6 towers) 8.45 - - 8.45 Line D (Double Circuit: 48 towers) 9.37 33.41 34.76 77.54 Total Area: 26.65 33.41 34.76 94.82 Percentage: 28.1 35.2 36.7 100.0

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 16

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

3.3.4 Other Impacts and Summary 44. Overall, 64 AHs will be affected by the construction of the TL, of whom 39 AHs will be affected by both towers and TL corridor, while 25 AHs will be affected only by the TL corridor only during the stringing activity (Table 3.6). The 39 AHs will be paid compensation for three crops (two for crops being affected due to construction and erection of the towers, and the third for crop damage/loss by the stringing activity). The 25 AHs who will experience crop damage or loss due to the stringing activity in the TL corridor will be paid compensation for one crop.

Table 3.6: Total Area of Affected Crops

Affected Crops

Private Farmlands (ha) Government Land (ha) Transmission Line Total Tower Corridor Total Tower Corridor

(A) Incoming Single 8.58 1.50 7.08 0.0 0.0 0.0 (B) Outgoing Single 8.45 1.50 6.95 0.0 0.0 0.0 (D) Double Circuit 77.79 12.00 65.79 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total: 94.82 15.00 78.82 0.0 0.0 0.0

45. In addition to crop loss, trees will be affected and removed from the 50m wide corridor of the TL. As shown in Table 3.7, some 48 AHs (73% of total 64 AHs) will lose 542 trees (122 fruit trees and 420 wood trees). Most are trees located individually or in clusters, mostly on field boundaries. There are no plantations or fruit orchards affected. Of the 542 trees, 458 trees will be affected by the TL corridor, while the remaining 84 trees will be affected by tower construction.

Table 3.7: Total Number of Affected Fruit and Wood Trees (D. G. Khan)

Affected Tree Number of Affected Trees by Type of Line (No.) Type Species Line A Line B Line D Total

Fruit Mango 0 3 9 12 Date Palm 24 16 70 110 Sub-Total (a): Fruit Trees 24 19 79 122 Shisham/Sisso 25 14 121 160 Sirin/Saras 14 12 87 113 Wood* Kikar/Acasia 9 11 37 57 Trees Toot/Mulberry 6 4 52 62 Poplar/Eucalypt 4 8 16 28 Sub-Total (b): Wood Trees 58 49 313 420 Total Affected Trees (a+b): 82 68 392 542

* Botanical Names: Shisham = Sisso; Sirin = Albizia Lebbek; Kikar = Acacia Nicolta; Toot = Mulberry. 46. Compensation for affected trees is based on their total removal. Compensation for fruit trees is based on the current market price of fruit production for the number of years required for a tree to mature sufficiently to produce fruit, as shown in Table 3.8. For affected wood trees, compensation is based on current market rate of the wood, which is assessed on the basis of tree size (height and girth) as shown in Table 3.9.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 17

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table 3.8: Categorization and Income Replacement Values of Affected Fruit Trees

Categorization No. of Fruit Potential for Fruiting Income Affected Fruit Tree Maturity Age Harvests Period Annual Replacement Level (Years) Per Year (Years) Income (Rs) Value (Rs.) Date Palm Immature up to 10 0 15 1,000 15,000 Mature-1 10 - 20 1 10 1,000 10,000 Mature-2 above 20 1 5 700 3,500 Mango Immature up to 08 0 12 1,700 20,400 Mature-1 08 - 16 1 8 1,700 13,600 Mature-2 above 16 1 4 1,200 4,800

Table 3.9: Relative Sizes of Affected Wood Trees by Height and Girth

Small Medium Large Wood Tree Height (m) Girth (m) Height (m) Girth (m) Height (m) Girth (m) Shisham < 3.8 < 0.5 3.9 - 7.6 0.5 - 0.9 >7.7 >1.0 Eucalyptus < 4.6 < 0.3 4.6 - 9.1 0.4 - 0.5 >9.1 >0.5 Kikar < 3.0 < 0.5 3.1 - 6.1 0.5 - 0.9 >6.1 >1.0 Mulberry < 3.0 < 0.5 3.1 - 6.1 0.5 - 0.9 >6.1 >1.0 Sirin/Saras < 3.8 < 0.5 3.9 - 7.6 0.5 - 0.9 >7.7 >1.0

47. As noted previously, the impacts of the Subproject include the loss of crops and trees. There are no houses or other structures affected, there are no community property resources nor any business activities affected by the Subproject.

3.4 Census of Affected Households 3.4.1 AHs Affected by Towers and Transmission Line 48. The construction of 20.8 km long 500kV TL will traverse irrigated farmlands in three villages; Aaliwala, Paigan and Gadai, as shown in Tables 3.10 and 3.11 Table 3.10: Households Affected by Towers and TL Corridor Total Total No. Number of AHs Transmission Line Length of Towers (km) Towers + TL TL Corridor Total (A) Incoming Single 1.7 6 5 7 12 (B) Outgoing Single 1.7 6 5 2 7 (D) Double Circuit 17.4 48* 29 16 45 Total: 20.8 60 39 25 64 Percentage: - - 60.9 39.1 100.0 * Excluding towers located on uncultivated government land.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 18

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table 3.11: Affected Households by Village

AHs by Village Household Affected by Aaliwala Paigan Gadai Total

Line A (Incoming Single: 6 towers) 12 - - 12 Line B (Outgoing Single: 6 towers) 7 - - 7 Line D (Double Circuit: 48 towers) 3 19 23 45 Total (60 Towers): 22 19 23 64

3.4.2 Significance of Impacts 49. The impact of loss of crops will be minor (non-significant) for each of the 64 AHs, as they have relatively large farms with highly fertile lands. The impacts equate to less than 10% of the total productive land of each individual farmer (Table 3.10). The 50m wide strip of land will be acquired temporarily as a working corridor for installation of the new towers and stringing of the power lines.

Table 3.10: Percentage of Crop Lost by Affected Households

Crop Loss (%) TL No. of AHs Minimum Maximum Average

Line A 12 3.31 8.94 5.65 Line B 07 2.40 7.95 5.92 Line D 45 2.11 8.35 5.56 Total 64 2.11 8.94 5.62

50. The transmission line and towers will affect only agricultural crops, no AHs will be experience restricted access to, or use of, their farmlands. Cotton and/or wheat crops will be affected on 94.82 ha of private land, overall the impact of crop loss is insignificant (average of 5.6%) and ranges from 2.1% to 8.9%. 51. As explained in Section 4, none of the 64 AHs are vulnerable (or include individually vulnerable people), as their incomes are such that they are above the national 4 poverty line F , and they live predominantly in a joint/extended family system which serves as a safety net against external economic shocks. None of the 64 AHs were found to be headed by a widow or unmarried woman, nor any disabled person as such persons (if any) are supported by their relatives living in the same households. Finally, the overall community impact (i.e. village level) will be negligible to just minor. 3.5 Impacts on Public Land and Infrastructure 52. In addition to the 41 ha uncultivated government land to be purchased for the new 500kV sub-station, the TL corridor will traverse government land and infrastructure.

4 See Table A-6 (Per Capita Incomes), In Appendix 1: Working Tables, for details on Incomes of all the affected households.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 19

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

53. The TL corridor will cross over N-55 - Indus Highway, a railway track, and three irrigation canals. Thus, a total four No-Objection Certificates (NOCs) will be required from the following agencies: (a) Federal Agencies: (i) National Highway Authority (NHA); and, (ii) Pakistan Railways (PR); (b) Provincial Departments: (iii) Punjab Forest Department (PFD); and, (iv) Punjab Irrigation Department (PID). 54. No special action, other than advance notice, will be required for crossing over minor infrastructure, i.e., smaller rural access roads or watercourses. For crossing major infrastructure NTDC will be required to continue consultation, obtain formal permission through a NOC from each concerned federal and provincial departments/agencies, and provide advance notice of commencement of works. NTDC will not be required to pay a fee or compensation. 5 55 Table 3.12 provides further details on impacts on public infrastructure. F

Table 3.12: Infrastructure Traversed by Transmission Line Corridor

Tower Nos. Length Agency Infrastructure From To (m) Level Agency

D 07 D 08 Indus Highway (N-55) 64 Federal NHA D 10 D 11 Ishoria Branch Canal 20 Provincial PID D 14 D 15 Railway Track (Paighan) 16 Federal PR D 17 D 18 Minor Canal + Rural Road 32 Provincial PID D 19 D 20 Minor Canal + Drain 24 Provincial PID D 29 D 30 Main Drain 18 Provincial PID D 38 D 39 Minor Canal 15 Provincial PID D 41 D 42 Canal Distributary 30 Provincial PID D 47 D 48 Twin Canals: D. G. Canal & Kachhi Canal 121 Provincial PID

5 Smaller rural access roads, watercourses, etc. (minor infrastructure) are not included here; for full details, please refer to Appendix 1 (Working Table A-01).

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 20

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

4. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF AFFECTED PEOPLE

4.1 Census of Affected Households 4.1.1 Methodology 56. After obtaining the pre-requisite location maps, field layout and profile drawings, revenue records and in-field assistance of a technical surveyor, intensive fieldwork was carried out for preparing this Short LARP. The RFS was conducted between May 16th and 24th 2007. 57. The RFS involved taking field measurements, quantification and costing of the affected assets with active community participation. The enumeration of AHs (100%) included questions about their socio-economic characteristics in order to obtain necessary socio-economic information. 58. Community consultations were held at a number of villages all along the TL with small groups of men and women, separately, belonging mostly to the affected households (see Section 6 for details and Appendix 2 for the full list of participants). 59. The field surveys were undertaken by a Resettlement Specialist, assisted by a team of three Resettlement Surveyors; two male and one female. Most of the respondents to the resettlement census survey were the heads of their household. 4.1.2 General Information on Affected Households 60. As stated in Section 3, a total 64 households will be affected (with a total population of 805 persons) who will experience a temporary and non-significant impacts on agricultural crops and trees (Table 4.1). The description provided in this section includes information about AHs as well as individuals (APs). 61. All of the 64 AHs are Muslim, ethnically Siraiki, and speak Siraiki language (the language spoken in the entire southern districts of the Punjab province). 62. In terms of social group, while most AHs (86%) can trace their bloodlines to Baloch tribes (especially Leghari sub-tribe) some can are linked with various Punjabi caste social groups (14%). Table 4.1: Affected Households and Population by Village

Village No. of AHs Affected Population

Aaliwala 22 277 Paigan 19 277 Gadai 23 251 Total 64 805

4.1.3 Indigenous People 63. None of the AHs are tribal or minority members and all affected land is held in private ownership (i.e. no tribal or communal ownership). Similarly, none of the 64 AHs were found to be vulnerable. The field work did identify five widows, three disabled persons, and twenty-two aged persons among the AH group enumerated in the survey. These people are not considered as vulnerable because they are well- protected socio-economically by their joint and extended family structures, and hence, they are not individually vulnerable, or pose a risk of increased vulnerability on their families, to any adverse impacts to be caused by this Subproject.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 21

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

64. Therefore the standard provisions of the LARF and this LARP are sufficient to ensure an effective compensation process and the requirements of ADB Policy on Indigenous People are complied with. The ADB’s policy, as specified in the Indigenous Peoples Development Framework (IPDF) prepared for this project is not triggered, and therefore neither an IPDP nor special action is required for this Subproject. 4.2 Data on Heads of Affected Households 65. All heads of household are male, and are married, in all cases the spouse lives in the same household (i.e. none are separated). Over three-quarters of household heads (79%) are between 41 and 60 years old, some 16% are aged between 61 and 75 years old, while a small proportion (five per cent) are young, aged between 36 and 40 years. 62. As noted above, there are twenty–two elderly AHs (i.e. older than 70 years). 66. In terms of literacy and education, 57 per cent of household heads stated they are literate (can read and write in Urdu). A third of household heads have no formal education, a quarter of household heads have a primary education and 23 per cent have a secondary education. Some six per cent have attained higher education (including vocational, business/teacher training). 4.3 Data on Affected Households and Population 4.3.1 Households 67. The AHs in the subproject area are large, with an average size of 12.5 persons, indicating a dominant trend towards an extended family system. The smallest household is made up of five persons and the largest household consists of 29 people. Tables 4.2 to 4.4 provide details on household size, and their age and gender compositions. Table 4.4 shows that people aged between 26 and older account for 60 per cent of AHs, suggesting a low dependency ratio as these people are largely responsible for taking care of the household economy. Children and youth account for the remaining 40 per cent who are the major consumers of the household incomes, especially for education and health. Table 4.2: Average Size of Affected Households

Household Size (Number of Persons) Line No. of AHs Minimum Maximum Average

Line A 12 9 14 11.33 Line B 7 9 17 12.71 Line D 45 5 29 12.89 Total 64 5 29 12.58

Table 4.3: Gender Composition of Affected Households

Total Number of Persons Line No. AHs Male Female Total

Line A 12 67 69 136 Line B 7 43 46 89 Line D 45 291 289 580 Total 64 401 404 805

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 22

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table 4.4: Age and Gender Composition of AHs

Total Number of Persons Age in Years Age Group Male Female Total No. Percentage

Children < 15 87 92 179 22.3 Youth 16 – 25 69 72 141 17.5 Adults 26 – 70 241 234 475 59.0 Elderly Above 70 4 6 10 1.2 Total All Ages 401 404 805 100.0

4.3.2 Housing 68. None of the AHs live in simple dwellings (constructed of thatch, sack, bamboo, clay or earth). All respondents stated that they live in houses constructed of brick and concrete. This was also confirmed by observations made during the field surveys. This indicates that in general AHs appear to be economically well-off. 4.3.3 Livelihood and Incomes 69. All AHs are agriculturists, and more specifically, landowner farmers. Table 4.5 shows that overall farm size of AHs is relatively large with an average of 25.8 ha, and a range from 5.06 ha to 101.21 ha. This also indicates that AHs are socio- economically stable compared with the standard size of small farms in the Punjab province which is < 5.06 ha (or 12.5 acres). Table 4.5: Farm Size of Affected Households

Farm Size (ha) Line No. AHs Minimum Maximum Average

Line A 12 5.06 20.24 12.55 Line B 7 10.12 38.87 18.57 Line D 45 5.06 101.21 30.58 Total 64 5.06 101.21 25.89

70. As shown in Table 4.6, 63% of male APs and 37% of female APs are engaged in work for income. Most APs working for income are engaged in agriculture with 67% overall (64% male and 28% female), and 21% are in paid employment with just over half of APs being employed (55%) being female. The remaining proportion of APs (12%) working for income are engaged in business, and accounts for more men (58%) than women. Table 4.6: Involvement of AHs by Gender in Income Sectors

Income Number of APs Sector as % of Sector Male Female Total total

Agriculture 64 28 92 66.67 Business 10 07 17 12.32 Employment 13 16 29 21.01 Total (Sectors): 87 51 138 100.00 Percentage: 63.04 36.96 100.00 --

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 23

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

71. As shown in Table 4.7 agriculture contributes 88% of the total income of AHs followed by wages from employment (8%) and finally from business (4%). Also as shown in that table, the total average income of males is higher than that of females, even in the waged employment sector in which there are more active females than males. Table 4.7: Average Income by Sector & Gender

Income Average Income by Gender (Rs.) Sector as % of Sector Male Female Total total

Agriculture 192,793.75 5,718.75 198,512.50 88.62 Business 6,750.00 1,828.13 8,578.13 3.83 Employment 9,421.88 7,500.00 16,921.88 7.55 Total: 208,965.63 15,046.88 224,012.51 100.00 Percentage: 93.28 6.72 100.00 ---

4.3.4 Poverty Level 72. In Pakistan, the poverty line is fixed at a monthly per capita income Rs. 849.00. Based on the survey data none of the 64 AHs fall on or below this poverty line, and even the minimum monthly per capita income is higher than the poverty line (average Rs 958). As shown in Table 4.8, the average per capita monthly incomes in AHs is relatively high with Rs. 1,461.00, and a range from Rs. 1,164 to Rs. 1,488. Table 4.8: Monthly per Capita Income of Affected Households

Monthly Per Capita Income (Rs.) Line No. AHs Minimum Maximum Average Line A 12 997.00 1,400.00 1,164.20 Line B 07 958.00 1,500.00 1,158.00 Line D 45 978.00 2,188.00 1,488.00 Total 64 958.00 2,188.00 1,461.00

4.3.5 Literacy 73. Table 4.9 shows an overall AP literacy rate of 56%. The literacy rate of male APs is higher than that of female APs (59% compared with 40%). The literacy rate of the children (up to 15 years of age) is found to be the highest at 76 per cent, with boys rated at 86 per cent and the girls rated at 66 per cent. Table 4.9: Literacy Rate of APs by Gender

APs Male Female Total

Total Number of APs 401 404 805 Literate APs (Number) 269 180 449 AP Literacy Rate (%) 59.9 40.1 55.8

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 24

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

5. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 74. The compensation and rehabilitation program described in this LARP involves a number of agencies including; NTDC as the implementing agency, the Punjab Board of Revenue, the Ministry of Environment, NGOs, Provincial Government of Punjab, and the Dera Ghazi Khan district government, as described in Figure 5.1 and discussed below. Figure 5.1 - LAR Organogram and Actions

Environmental Protection Ag.

LAR STEERING COMMITTEE LOCAL GOVERNMENT

PROVINCE

Board of revenue Other Departments PMU Land compensation District Nazim

District Coordination Office (DCO) District Departments PIU - Land Acquisition Collector(LAC)

Thesil Nazim

LAR CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE Other Compensation Union Councils

Complaints and Grievances

Administrative Function

AP Co-ordination function

Finance Direction

5.1 National Transmission and Dispatch Company 75. NTDC has overall responsibility for the preparation, implementation and financing of all tasks set out in this LARP as well as inter-agency coordination. NTDC will exercise its functions through a centrally based Project Management Unit (PMU) which will be responsible for general project execution, and at subproject level through Project Implementation Units (PIUs) which will be tasked with day-to-day project activities. 76. Within the PMU, LARP tasks will be managed by a specific group; the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Unit (LARU), which will update this LARP (including surveys, asset valuation, community consultation, and approvals), and internally monitor LARP implementation.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 25

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

77. In the implementation of these tasks the LARU will receive specific technical assistance from: • Resettlement Specialist under the Design and Supervision Consultant team, who will assist in LARU in land acquisition planning, LARP implementation, internal monitoring, and imparting training to the NTDC and district governments on impact assessment and entitlements, and ADB policy/LARF requirements; • An impact assessment/valuation team hired as required to assist in on-site preparation of surveys, base-line information gathering and AP consultation; and • An external monitoring agency (EMA) to be hired to conduct periodic monitoring and third party validation of LARP implementation (see Section 5.4). 5.2 District Government 78. District governments have jurisdiction for land administration, valuation and acquisition. At the provincial level these functions rest with the Board of Revenue while at district level they rest with the District Collector Office (DCO) and the Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) within the DCO. A number of minor agents, most notably the Patwari, (the keeper of land records), carry out specific roles such as titles identification and verification (see Figure 5.2). Functions pertaining to compensation of assets different from land (i.e buildings, crops and trees) or income rehabilitation also fall on the local governments, more specifically on the relevant District Department.

Figure 5.2: Organization of District Land Acquisition Collector Office EDO-R / LAC Executive District Officer (Revenue) (Land Acquisition Collector)

Tesildar / Naib Tehsildar Land Acquisition Officers (LAO) [Tehsil (Sub-District) Land Records Officer]

Girdawar / Qanungo Land Surveyor (In-Charge, Land Records)

Patwari Assistant Land Surveyor (Land Records Clerks)

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 26

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

5.3 Other Agencies and Institutions 79. As various agencies will need to be carefully coordinated so as to obtain effective, smooth and timely LARP implementation, a land acquisition steering committee (LASC) will be directly assigned to NTDC-PMU by the Punjab Board of Revenue and district level coordination committees. The LASC will be established at provincial level and will include NTDC’s General Manager; Provincial Chairman of Planning & Development Department, or Additional Chief Secretary; Chairman Punjab Board of Revenue; Director General Punjab-EPA; and, Project Director (PD) NTDC-PMU (Figure 5.3). 80. The LASC will meet periodically to ensure proper and timely formation of the district level coordination committees to facilitate the LARP approval and implementation processes.

Figure 5.3: Organization of Land Acquisition Steering Committee

Project Director PMU, NTDC

(Chief Coordinator)

Provincial Chairman, P&DD / Chairman, Provincial Project Director, Additional Chief Provincial Board of PMU, Director General, Secretary Revenue EPA NTDC (Principle Member)

81. A Land Acquisition Coordination Committee (LACC) will be formed in D. G. Khan Town to assist with the updating and implementation of the LARP (in particular execution of surveys, valuation of assets, AH consultation, and local approval of LARP provisions). The committee formation will be initiated by the NTDC-PMU, including representatives of PIU, LARU, Tehsildars of the concerned districts and Union Council Nazims representing the AHs (Figure 5.4). 82. One of the LCC functions will be to offer AHs a communications channel and support group for addressing complaints and grievances. In this function the LCC will hear the complaint, and if found justified will support its lodging at the PMU (this process is further described in Section 7). 83. This LARP will require review and clearance by the Punjab Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of Government’s Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) approval procedures, as well as approval by RSES, ADB (the division that assesses compliance with the safeguard policies at ADB Headquarters in Manila, Philippines).

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 27

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Figure 5.4: Organization of Land Acquisition Coordination Committee

District Coordination Officer (DCO) / Executive District Officer (Revenue) (Chairman)

District Officer Tehsildar Union Council Deputy Director, (Revenue) (Revenue Officer) Nazim/s PIU, NTDC (Principle Member) (Member) (Member/s) (Member-Secretary)

5.4 Responsibility for Monitoring 84. Land acquisition tasks under the project will be subjected to both internal and external monitoring. Internal monitoring will be conducted by NTDC-PMU, assisted by the design and supervision consultant. External monitoring responsibilities will be assigned to an EMA (either a consultant or NGO) to be engaged by NTDC 6 according to the Terms of Reference (TOR) approved by ADB. F This aspect of the LARP implementation is further elaborated in Section 10 (Monitoring and Evaluation).

6 Terms of Reference for External Monitoring are provided in Appendix 4.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 28

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

6. CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSURE

6.1 Consultation Undertaken for the LARP 85. The consultative process undertaken for the preparation of the LARP has included AHs, representatives of local governments in the Subproject area, and members of local people’s organizations (e.g., CBCs, women’s organizations, peasant worker’s organizations). Special attention was paid to identify if there were vulnerable groups amongst AHs (such as the poor, women, and elderly) and if so, their needs, to ensure that the views of both AHs and their communities have been considered in the formulation of the LARP. 86. Consultation with stakeholders at the different stages of the subproject is required by ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement and the project’s LARF. To start with, consultations with the AHs were conducted as part of the DMS and census.. The communities’ and especially the AHs’ responses to the proposed subproject were found to be positive. 87. Along with the participatory DMS, semi-structured discussions aiming at community awareness and regarding the project’s likely impacts were also held with the small groups of men and women. Groups were formed of between 5 and 12 persons (averaging 9 men and 7 women) from villages in the Subproject area. 88. The participants were selected on the basis of their crop and trees losses, knowledge of and interest in this Subproject, and finally their availability and willingness to participate in discussions. A total of eight group consultation meetings were held (5 groups of men and 3 groups of women) in the three union councils and their associated villages. The total number of participants was 68, including 46 men 7 and 22 women (refer to Table 6.1). F Table 6.1: Participants in Group Discussions and Consultations

No. of Groups No. of Participants Village Men Women Total Men Women Total

Aaliwala 2 1 3 21 5 26 Paigan 2 1 3 16 7 23 Gadai 1 1 2 9 10 19 Total 5 3 8 46 22 68

89. The concerns raised during the consultation sessions, namely, the adequacy and timeliness of the compensation payments, and incorporation of safety measures, have been addressed by NTDC by making payment of crop and tree compensations to all the 64 AHs at least one month (30 days) prior to the temporary use of their farmlands (before starting the civil works), and instructing the Contractor/s to take all possible safety measures during the entire the Subproject execution period, especially during the construction and stringing activities.

7 Appendix 2 provides a complete listing of the participants by Gender and Villages.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 29

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

90. The local communities’ responses (awareness, perceptions and preferences) to the D. G. Khan subproject and resettlement related matters are summarized as follows: • Impacts and resettlement – the subproject’s overall impacts were considered minimal by the participants of the meetings. Thus, they supported the Subproject for ensuring an adequate and non-interrupted supply of power to their communities in particular, and to the country in general; • The subproject is necessary under local conditions - all of people at the meetings provided their support for the project stating that the current load- shedding and overloaded transmission lines require proper upgrading and enhancement so that the transmission network is safe and has the capacity to meet the needs of the communities; • Project awareness – the majority (82 per cent) of the participants are somewhat aware of the upcoming subproject, but none of them knew of its exact resettlement effects, the LARF nor entitlements for various types of loss. However, on the basis their prior experience, almost all the participants requested permission from NTDC for unrestricted use of their affected farmlands after the completion of the project works; and • Clearance of structure/assets from the subproject corridors - as there are no structures whether residential, commercial or cultural buildings affected and therefore no questions were asked about this matter. Fruit orchards and brick kilns have been avoided by minor alterations in the transmission line route alignment and by using angular towers to ensure higher clearance of transmission line above the fruit trees. For the affected “wood” trees that would be falling within 50m wide strip of land under the TL, all participants requested compensation based on the current open market values (and as provided in the compensation rates survey reported in Section 8). 6.2 Compensation Options Discussed 91. In addition to the focus group discussions and consultative meetings described above, the RFS Census Survey included several questions regarding AHs’ preferences for compensation and rehabilitation options. This information has been and will be used to assist in determining the support measures required by AHs. 92. The first compensation priority of all AHs is for cash, rather than land or a combination of cash and land. When asked why they preferred cash compensation, half of all AHs stated the reason was to assist with daily living expenses, while only three households stated it would compensate for their lost crops and/or trees. No AHs stated they would use compensation monies for establishing a business or agricultural activity or purchasing land. Some 20% of AHs stated they would use the compensation money to pay a debt. 93. AHs were also asked if they had a general knowledge of either the provisions of the LAA, no AHs stated they were aware of the LAA or its general provisions. This emphasizes the importance of provision of clear and timely information to AHs. 94. Some 58% of AHs stated that people should not be asked to voluntarily give up their land for public projects WITHOUT receiving compensation. For those that stated that people could be asked to give up their land without receiving compensation, only two reasons were given; if the people have other land or if the people being asked to relinquish land would not be materially affected by the loss then voluntary contributions are acceptable (i.e. if the losses to be suffered were small).

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 30

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

95. In summary, the compensation and resettlement options discussed and agreed upon during the consultation meetings included: • Relocation - not applicable; • Assistance - not applicable; • Compensation – the majority of AH representatives look forward to receiving a “fair” and “timely” compensation for their lost/affected crops and trees. By “fair”, they meant the application of prevalent open market rates, or “replacement value” for their crop production and wood trees. By “timely”, they meant prior to the temporary use of their lands and sustaining any damage to or removal of their crops and trees, as provided for in the LARF; and • Job opportunities - the more disadvantaged people in the villages requested that NTDC assist them with job opportunities with the contractors, on a priority basis, during project implementation. 6.3 LARP Disclosure 96. An English version of the program’s LARF has already been uploaded to ADB’s website and an Urdu version has been made available through NTDC’s headquarters and PIUs in Subproject areas (second tranche). 97. In line with ADB’s public communications policy, this LARP in English will also be posted on the ADB website, while its translation in Urdu will be disclosed to the AHs at the Dera Ghazi Khan PIU office and posted on the ADB website. 98. In addition, a public information booklet in Urdu, summarizing compensation provisions will be sent to all AHs (a draft booklet in English has been prepared as provided in Appendix 3).

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 31

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

7. GRIEVANCE REDRESS PROCESS 99. A grievance mechanism will be available to allow an AH appealing any disagreeable decision, practice or activity arising from land or other assets compensation. AHs will be fully informed of their rights and of the procedures for addressing complaints whether verbally or in writing during consultation, survey, and time of compensation. 100. Care will always be taken to prevent grievances rather than going through a redress process. This can be obtained through careful LAR design and implementation, by ensuring full participation and consultation with the AHs, and by establishing extensive communication and coordination between the community, the PMU, the LAC and local governments in general. 101. As finances will move differently for (i) land (for land use or access impacts) and (ii) other items compensation or rehabilitation (in the first case funds will move from NTDC through the District Collector Office to the AHs, while in the second funds will go directly from NTDC to the AHs. The complaint and grievances will be addressed through two different processes as described in Table 7.1.

Table 7.1: Grievance Resolution Process

Land & Crop Compensation Issues Other Compensation or Project Issues 1. First, complaints resolution will be attempted at 1. First, complaints resolution will be attempted at village level through the involvement of the LARU, village level through the involvement of the LARU, NGO NGO and informal mediators. and informal mediators.

2. If still unsettled, a grievance can then be lodged 2. If still unsettled, a grievance can be lodged to the to the LAC who has 30 days to decide on the case. PIU/LARU, which will have 30 days to respond.

3. If no solution was reached a grievance can be 3. If no solution was reached a grievance can be lodged lodged with support of the LCC to the PMU. The with support of the LCC to the PMU. The AH must lodge AH must lodge the complaint within 1 month of the complaint within 1 month of lodging the original lodging the original complaint with the LAC and complaint with the LAC and must produce documents must produce documents supporting his/her claim. supporting his/her claim. The PMU will provide the The PMU will provide the decision within 21 days of decision within 21 days of registering the complaint. registering the complaint. The PMU decision must The PMU decision must be in compliance with this be in compliance with this LARF provisions. LARF provisions.

4. Should the grievance redress system fail to 4. Should the grievance redress system fail to satisfy satisfy the AH, they can further submit their case to the AH, they can further submit their case to the the appropriate court of law as per the process set appropriate court of law as per the process set out in out in Sections 18 to 22 of the LAA (1894). Sections 18 to 22 of the LAA (1894).

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 32

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

8. BUDGET FOR LAND AND ASSET ACQUISITION

8.1 Basis for Compensation 102. Compensation for projects requiring land acquisition can often differ between the borrower and ADB (and other providers of official development assistance). To comply with ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement, rates used to compensate for lost crops and trees must be replacement cost at current market value, in order to meet the policy objective of “at least” restoring people’s livelihoods and ensuring that people affected by a project are not left worse off. 103. According to the project’s LARF, replacement cost is the amount of cash or kind needed to replace an asset in its existing or better condition, and is the value determined as compensation for the current market price without depreciation or deduction of the costs of any transaction or for any material salvaged. The processes for establishing the rates used for this Subproject followed the methodology set out in the project’s LARF. 8.2 Determining the Rate of Land for Substation 104. During the process of field surveys, an appraisal of crop and tree values and incomes was carried out in villages affected by the TL corridor. Actual current market prices of the crops (wheat and cotton), fruits (dates and mango) and wood, were collected from the eight groups during the consultation meetings, verified in the market of D. G. Khan, and then an average was computed for both the seasonal crops (wheat and cotton) and all the types of fruit and wood trees affected by the Subproject. 8.3 Determining the Rates for Compensation 105. The average prices and incomes were inflated by 10% to accommodate price fluctuations in the market between preparation of the LARP and the actual implementation of this LARP, which may be a period of one to two years. Based on the foregoing requirements and the LARF provisions, the methodology for assessing unit compensation values of the different items is described as follows: • Basic annual crop compensation was valued at net farm-gate market rates. If additional crops compensation is due it will be calculated at market value minus inputs. As noted earlier, compensation for crops affected by tower bases and perimeters is three-crop and for stringing of the lines is for one- crop; and • Fruit trees were valued based on age and productivity category (a. seedling; b. not yet productive; c. productive). Productive fruit trees were valued at gross market value of one year’s income multiplied by 10 years, the number of years needed to grow a new tree with the productive potential of the lost tree. Wood trees were valued based on wood’s market price by type, size, and age (dimensions rather than productivity). AHs are entitled to keep the wood (as salvaged material) without any deductions from the amount of compensation. 106. The valuation survey registered recent current crop and tree sales at markets and was based on AH and community consultation (including relevant local government agencies). The conclusion of the survey is that in most cases the actual transaction values are higher than the values officially documented and registered. The results of the survey are provided in the tables below (Tables 8.1 to 8.5).

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 33

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table 8.1: Average Crop Income in Subproject Area

Affected Crop Net Crop Income (Rs.) No. Crop Per Acre Per Ha Per m2 1 Cotton (Kharif Season) 42,800.00 105,716.00 10.57 2 Wheat (Rabi Season) 28,400.00 70,148.00 7.01 3 Maize/Fodder (Both) 34,700.00 85,709.00 8.57 Sum Total: 105,900.00 261,573.00 26.16 Average: 35,300.00 87,191.00 8.72

Table 8.2: Categorization and Income Replacement Values of Affected Fruit Trees

Name of Categorization No. of Fruit Potential for Fruiting Income Affected Maturity Age Harvests Period Annual Replacement No. Fruit Tree Level (Years) Per Year (Years) Income (Rs) Value (Rs.) 1 Date Palm Immature < 10 0 15 1,000 15,000 Mature-1 10 - 20 1 10 1,000 10,000 Mature-2 > 20 1 5 700 3,500 2 Mango Immature < 08 0 12 1,700 20,400 Mature-1 08 - 16 1 8 1,700 13,600 Mature-2 >16 1 4 1,200 4,800

Table 8.3: Number and Compensation of Affected Fruit Trees by Productivity

Name of Affected Fruit Trees (No.) Compensation Total Price No. Fruit Tree Category LineA LineB LineD Total Rate (Rs.) (Rs.) 1 Date Palm Immature 11 3 21 35 15,000 525,000 Mature-1 8 6 29 43 10,000 430,000 Mature-2 5 7 20 32 3,500 112,000 Sub-total (a): Date-Palm 24 16 70 110 - 1,067,000 2 Mango Immature 0 0 1 1 20,400 20,400 Mature-1 0 2 5 7 13,600 95,200 Mature-2 0 1 3 4 4,800 19,200 Sub-total (b): Mango 0 3 9 12 - 134,800 TOTAL: 24 19 79 122 - 1,201,800

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 34

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table 8.4: Relative Sizes of Affected Wood Trees by Size

Name of Small Medium Large Wood Tree Height (m) Girth (m) Height (m) Girth (m) Height (m) Girth (m) Shisham <3.8 <0.5 3.9 - 7.6 0.5 - 0.9 >7.7 >1.0 Eucalyptus <4.6 <0.3 4.6 - 9.1 0.4 - 0.5 >9.1 >0.5 Kikar <3.0 <0.5 3.1 - 6.1 0.5 - 0.9 >6.1 >1.0 Mulberry <3.0 <0.5 3.1 - 6.1 0.5 - 0.9 >6.1 >1.0 Sirin/Saras <3.8 <0.5 3.9 - 7.6 0.5 - 0.9 >7.7 >1.0

Table 8.5: Number and Compensation of Affected Wood Trees by Size No. Name of Relative Affected Wood Tree (No.) Market Rate Total Price Wood Tree Size Line A Line B Line D Total (Rs.) (Rs.) 1 Shisham Small 8 5 34 47 4,500 211,500 Medium 10 6 72 88 6,000 528,000 Large 7 3 15 25 8,000 200,000 Sub-total (a): Shisham 25 14 121 160 - 939,500 2 Eucalyptus Small 1 4 3 8 3,000 24,000 Medium 3 2 11 16 4,000 64,000 Large 0 2 2 4 6,000 24,000 Sub-total (b): Eucalyptus 4 8 16 28 - 112,000 3 Kikar (Acasia) Small 4 3 14 21 3,000 63,000 Medium 3 7 19 29 5,000 145,000 Large 2 1 4 7 7,000 49,000 Sub-total (c): Kikar (acasia) 9 11 37 57 - 257,000 4 Mulberry Small 2 0 17 19 2,500 47,500 Medium 1 3 32 36 4,000 144,000 Large 3 1 3 7 6,000 42,000 Sub-total (d): Mulberry 6 4 52 62 - 233,500 5 Sirin/Saras Small 6 5 32 43 2,500 107,500 Medium 5 5 43 53 4,500 238,500 Large 3 2 12 17 6,000 102,000 Sub-total (e): Sirin/Saras 14 12 87 113 - 448,000 TOTAL: 44 37 226 420 - 1,990,000

107. Crop compensation will be split into categories; (i) crops affected up to three times by construction of towers (i.e. preparation of foundations, erection of towers and stringing of power cables) will require compensation to the value of three crops to be paid to 39 AHs; and, (ii) crops affected by stringing of power cables in the TL corridor will require compensation for one crop compensation. Compensation for fruit trees has been assessed on the basis of current market value of the fruit multiplied by 10 years, and the compensation for wood trees is assessed on the basis of current market value of the wood.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 35

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

8.4 Budget for Land and Asset Acquisition 104. The following discussion and budget is inclusive of the land to be acquired from the Provincial Government for the Sub-Station. The price for the 41 ha will be negotiated following the constitution of a Land Valuation Committee to be established for this purpose, under the Chairmanship of the Executive District Officer (Revenue), D. G. Khan District. However, based on prevalent market prices of lands in the adjacent rural areas of D. G. Khan district, especially the villages to be affected by the transmission line, a total cost has been estimated for the planning purposes at Pak. Rs. 50.64 million (US$ 830,000). 105. This LARP addresses the resettlement cost estimate of the TL component of the Subproject and includes the cost of compensation for affected crops and trees, rehabilitation of lands and watercourses which may get partially damaged during the field operations, and other restoration/assistance entitlements of the 64 AHs only, and other associated costs. The cost estimates have been based on the rates derived through consultation and surveys as described in Section 8.2. The rates for compensation and cash entitlements for rehabilitation as well as allowances payable to AHs may be adjusted, based on actual annual inflation rate by LARU and NTDC. 106. The total compensation for crops and trees is Rs. 14.03 million (US$ 230,315), while Rs. 1.82 million are allocated to other activities, i.e., rehabilitation of lands and watercourses, technical assistance, and training. 107. The administrative charges have been estimated as 10% of the total compensation (Rs. 9.7 million or US$ 159,404). These charges are to cover the costs of implementing the plan (producing and distributing the PIB, holding individual and group consultations and public meetings as required, verifying the , revising the LARP if required (to reflect any minor changes), organizing and arranging for the compensation payments through the LACs), and internal monitoring of the plan and its implementation. Further, a contingency of 10% has been included in the cost estimate, which is Rs. 970,775 (US$ 15,940). 108. Funds for compensation and implementation of the LARP will be from the Government (counterpart funds) via NTDC, budgetary requirements for economic restoration, as part of resettlement budget will also come from the counterpart funds and shall be identified as allowances. The EMA will be financed as a project loan cost as a component of the project support fund from ADB. 109. To sum up, as shown in Table 8.6, the total cost of LARP implementation, including the cost of the government land to be purchased for the Sub-Station, is estimated at Rs. 77.22 million or US$ 1.27 million.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 36

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table 8.6: Estimated Cost of D. G. Khan LARP

No. Resettlement Activity No. Unit Rs./Unit Total Rs. A. Asset Compensation - - - 64,718,340 A.1 Land Purchase for Substation: 41 ha 50,642,175 Land Price (based on Rs. 465,182 per Acre) 41 ha 1,149,000 47,109,000 Taxes and Stamp Papers, etc. (@7.5%) 0.075 - - 3,533,175 A.2 Trees: 542 tree - 3,191,800 A.2.1 Fruit Trees: 122 tree - 1,201,800 Date Palm 110 tree 9,700 1,067,000 Mango 12 tree 11,233 134,800 A.2.2 Wood Trees: 420 tree - 1,990,000 Shisham (sisso) 160 tree 5,872 939,500 Sirin (albezia lebek) 113 tree 3,965 448,000 Kikar (acasia nicolta) 57 tree 4,509 257,000 Toot (mulberry) 62 tree 3,766 233,500 Poplar/Eucalypts 28 tree 4,000 112,000 A.3 Crops: - - - 10,884,365 Cotton/Wheat - Towers (x 3 Crops) 150,000 m2 8.72 3,924,000 Cotton/Wheat - TL Corridor (1 Crop) 798,207 m2 8.72 6,960,365 B. Other Activities - - - 1,818,901 B.1 Rehabilitation of Affected Lands/Structures 864,835 m2 0.60 518,901 B.2 Resettlement Specialist (impl.) 3.00 pers/mo 300,000 900,000 B.3 External monitoring 1.00 pers/mo 300,000 300,000 B.4 Training of NTDC staff (incl. materials) 1.00 lumpsum 100,000 100,000 C. Administration Costs (15% of A: Compensation) 0.15 lumpsum 64,718,340 9,707,751 D. Subtotal (A+B+C) - - - 76,244,992 E. Contingency (10% of C: Administration) 0.10 lumpsum 9,707,751 970,775 Total Amount (Pak. Rupees): - - - 77,215,767 Total Amount (US Dollars*): - - - 1,267,911 * US$ 1.00 = Rs. 60.90.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 37

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

9. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 110. The overall program will be planned and implemented in a three year period with Tranche 2 subprojects scheduled to commence upon loan approval. Implementation of resettlement related activities will take place after the project supervision consultant has mobilized, who will work closely with and assist NTDC-PMU in all the resettlement related activities, as described in Table 9.1. 111. No civil/installation works Contracts will be awarded until this Short LARP has been approved by both EPA and ADB. Civil works contractors will not be issued a notice of possession of site for any section of construction works unless NTDC has satisfactorily completed, in accordance with the approved LARP, and compensation payments have been made and the area required is free of all encumbrances. Moreover, NOCs from concerned agencies will also be obtained prior to start of installation works. 112. The LARP implementation schedule, shown below, envisages the following sequence of activities; some of these steps will overlap in their timing and some will be repeated throughout the project schedule.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 38

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table 9.1: Implementation Schedule for D. G. Khan Subproject

Responsibility 2007 2008 (Qrtrs) 2009 (Qrtrs) LARP Activity/Task Primary Secondary Prep I II III IV I II III IV LARF Revision (if necessary) NTDC-PMU LARU/RS LARF Disclosure - Brochure in Urdu NTDC-PMU LARU/RS LARF Brochure (English) on ADB Website NTDC-PMU ADB Prepare Short LARP for Subproject NTDC-PMU LARU/RS Request to Forest Department for NOC NTDC-PMU LARU/RS

Preparation Request to DRO for Land Transfer NTDC-PMU LARU/RS Land Price Negotiations with EDO-R/PRB NTDC-PMU LARU/RS Request to Other Agencies for NOCs DRO/LAC LARU/RS Site Demarcation of Affected Lands NTDC-PMU LARU/RS Mobilize project's supervision consultant NTDC/PMU ADB Adjust compensation for inflation (if any) NTDC-PMU LARU/RS LARP Revision (if necessary) NTDC-PMU LARU/RS Information dissemination on compensation NTDC-PMU LARU/RS Submit revised LARP to EPA/ADB. NTDC-PMU LARU/RS LARP approval prior to Award of Contracts EPA/ADB NTDC Transfer of Funds to PRB for Land Transfer NTDC-PMU LARU EDO-R / PRB Transfers Land to NTDC EDO-R/PRB PMU

Implementation Implementation Pay Compensation to Affected Households LARU/GSC PMU Compensation to AHs prior to Start of Work NTDC-PMU RS/ADB Possession of land for starting works DRO/LAC PMU Removal of affected trees LARU/GSC Contractor Grievance Redress Process (if necessary) GRC/LACC LARU/RS Pay re-adjusted Compensations (if any) LARU/GSC PMU Hire External Monitor (Consultant/NGO) NTDC ADB LARP Monitoring - Internal & Baseline NTDC-PMU LARU/RS LARP Monitoring - External Monitoring EMA LARU/RS Contractor mobilized, work started NTDC-PMU Contractor Pay final adjusted crop/tree compensations NTDC-PMU LARU/RS Construction Construction Rehabilitate damaged land/infrastructure Contractor LARU/RS LARP monitoring; post-evaluation report EMA/LARU NTDC/ADB

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 39

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

10. MONITORING AND EVALUATION

113. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) are critical activities in involuntary resettlement caused by various infrastructure development projects, like this power transmission enhancement project. Monitoring involves periodic checking to ascertain whether activities are progressing as per schedule while evaluation is essentially a summing up, at the end of the project, assessment of actual achievement in comparison to those aimed at during the implementation. RP implementation will be monitored both internally as well as externally. 114. The NTDC-PMU through LARU will be responsible for the internal monitoring through PIU or field office. The Resettlement Specialist will provide necessary technical assistance in implementing and monitoring the resettlement activities. In addition, a part-time Consultant will be responsible for independent external monitoring and evaluation of the resettlement activities. 10.1 Internal Monitoring 115. This Short LARP includes indicators and benchmarks for achievement of the objectives under the resettlement program, which can be categorized as follows: • Process indicators, which include project inputs, expenditures, staff deployment; • Output indicators are results in terms of numbers of affected persons compensated for their affected assets (land, crops and/or trees), and, • Impact indicators related to the long-term effect of the project on people’s lives in the project-affected area. 116. The first two types of indicators, related to process and immediate outputs and results, will be monitored internally by LARU. This information will be collected from the project site and assimilated in the form of a monthly progress report to assess the progress and results of LARP implementation, and adjust the work program, where necessary, in case of any delays or problems. 117. Specific activities under LARP implementation to be monitored are the following: • Information campaign and consultation with AHs on a continued basis; • Status of land acquisition/purchase and payments of crop and tree compensations; • Status of restoration of damaged community infrastructure (water pipelines, irrigation channels / watercourses, drains, roads, streets, etc.) • Grievances redress activities 118. The LARU will be responsible for monitoring the day-to-day resettlement activities of the subproject. The socio-economic census and land acquisition data will provide the necessary benchmark for field level monitoring, to be carried out through: • Review of IOL/Census information for all AHs; • Consultation and informal interviews with AHs; • In-depth case studies; • Informal sample survey of AHs; • Key informant interviews; and

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 40

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

• Community public meetings. 119. A performance data sheet will be developed to monitor the project at the field level. Quarterly reports will be received from the field offices and LAC/GSC will be responsible for overall project level monitoring. 10.2 External Monitoring 120. As stated in Section 5 (Institutional Arrangements), an individual consultant, consulting firm, or NGO will be engaged on a part-time basis to carry out independent monitoring and evaluation of the LARP implementation (see TOR in Appendix 4). Independent evaluation will be undertaken during and after the LARP implementation and upon completion of the Subproject. The EMA will be selected by NTDC/PMU with advice and concurrence of ADB. The NTDC is to complete the hiring process and commence EMA services during the third quarter of the next year (July-September 2008). 121. The EMA will review the status of the resettlement implementation in light of the targets, budget and duration that has been laid down in this short LARP. The key tasks during external monitoring include: • Review and verify internal monitoring reports prepared by LARU; • Identification and selection of impact indicators; • Impact assessment through formal & informal surveys with the affected persons; • Consultations with AHs, officials, community leaders for review report; and • Assessment of the resettlement efficiency, impact and sustainability, and drawing lessons for future resettlement policy formulation and planning. 10.3 Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation 122. The following will be considered as the basis for indicators in monitoring and evaluation of the subproject’s LARP: • Socio-economic conditions of the AHs in the post-resettlement period; • Communications and reactions from AHs on entitlements, compensation, options, alternative developments and relocation timetables etc.; • Changes in housing and income levels; • Valuation of property; • Grievance procedures; • Disbursement of compensation; and • Level of satisfaction of AHs in the post resettlement period. 10.4 Resettlement Database 123. All information concerning resettlement issues related to land acquisition, socio- economic information of the acquired land; inventory of crop and tree losses by individual AHs, compensation and entitlements and payments will be collected by LARU and the consultants through their concerned field offices and computerized by the LARU. This database will form the basis of information for implementation, monitoring and reporting purposes and facilitate efficient resettlement management.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 41

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

10.5 Reporting Requirements 124. The LARU responsible for supervision and implementation of LARP will prepare monthly progress reports on resettlement activities and submit them to the ADB for review. The Resettlement Specialist will also monitor LARP implementation independently and submit quarterly reports to PMU, NTDC and ADB. These quarterly reports will also highlight the bottlenecks and recommend ways and means to improve such problematic situations. 125. The external Consultant will submit bi-annual review reports directly to ADB and determine whether or not resettlement goals have been achieved, more importantly whether livelihoods and living standards have been restored/enhanced and suggest suitable recommendations for improvement. S/he will also provide a copy of the same report to NTDC Headquarters for information and successive action.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 42

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Working Tables Appendix 2 – List of People Consulted for LARP Appendix 3 – Draft Public Information Brochure Appendix 4 – Terms of Reference for External Monitoring Consultant/NGO

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 43

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Appendix 1 – Working Tables

Table A-1: Land Affected by Construction of 500kV Transmission Lines under D.G. Khan Subproject

Working Table A-1: Land Affected by Construction of 500kV Transmission Lines under D.G. Khan Subproject Affected Private Land (Crop Compensation: Towers: 3 Crops; TL Corridor: 1 Crop) Affected Government Land (No Compensation) Land Under TowersTower Nos. Distance TL Corridor (50m wide) Total Land (Public Infrastructure: Length x 50m Width)) Tower No. Land (m2) (From-To) (Meters) Length (m) Area (m2) Sq. Meters Hectares Description Length Area (m2) Area (ha) A: Incoming Single Circuit New Transmission Line (From 500kV Guddu-Multan Transmission Line): A-1 2,500 A 1-2 254.05 229.05 11,453 13,953 1.40 -- - - A-2 2,500 A 2-3 320.00 260.00 13,000 15,500 1.55 Rajanpur Road 10.00 500 0.05 A-3 2,500 A 3-4 288.00 238.00 11,900 14,400 1.44 -- - - A-4 2,500 A 4-5 280.00 230.00 11,500 14,000 1.40 -- - - A-5 2,500 A 5-6 280.00 230.00 11,500 14,000 1.40 -- - - A-6 2,500 A 6 - D 01 279.52 229.52 11,476 13,976 1.40 -- - - A-1 - A-6 15,000 sub-total (a): 1,701.57 1,416.57 70,828.50 85,829 8.58 - 10.00 500 0.05 B: Outgoing Single Circuit Line (To 500kV Guddu-Multan Transmission Line): B-1 2,500 D 01 - B 1 277.73 227.73 11,387 13,887 1.39 -- - - B-2 2,500 B 1 - 2 300.00 250.00 12,500 15,000 1.50 -- - - B-3 2,500 B 2 - 3 270.31 214.31 10,716 13,216 1.32 Village Road 6.00 300 0.03 B-4 2,500 B 3 - 4 340.00 290.00 14,500 17,000 1.70 -- - - B-5 2,500 B 4 - 5 280.00 230.00 11,500 14,000 1.40 -- - - B-6 2,500 B 5 - 6 203.08 178.08 8,904 11,404 1.14 -- - - B-1 - B-6 15,000 sub-total (b): 1,671.12 1,390.12 69,506.00 84,506 8.45 - 6.00 300 0.03 D: Double Circuit (Incoming & Outgoing Lines to Grid Station): D 01 2,500 D 01 - 02 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 02 2,500 D 02 - 03 350.00 292.00 14,600 17,100 1.71 Aaliwala Road 8.00 400 0.04 D 03 2,500 D 03 - 04 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 04 2,500 D 04 - 05 351.04 301.04 15,052 17,552 1.76 -- - - D 05 2,500 D 05 - 06 300.00 244.00 12,200 14,700 1.47 Village Road 6.00 300 0.03 D 06 2,500 D 06 - 07 300.00 250.00 12,500 15,000 1.50 -- - - D 07 2,500 D 07 - 08 350.00 236.00 11,800 14,300 1.43 Indus Highway (N-55) 64.00 3,200 0.32 D 08 2,500 D 08 - 09 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 09 2,500 D 09 - 10 380.00 330.00 16,500 19,000 1.90 -- - - D 10 2,500 D 10 - 11 350.00 280.00 14,000 16,500 1.65 Ishoria Canal 20.00 1,000 0.10 D 11 2,500 D 11 - 12 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 12 2,500 D 12 - 13 360.00 310.00 15,500 18,000 1.80 -- - - D 13 2,500 D 13 - 14 377.57 327.57 16,379 18,879 1.89 -- - - D 14 2,500 D 14 - 15 350.00 284.00 14,200 16,700 1.67 Raliway Track 16.00 800 0.08 D 15 2,500 D 15 - 16 300.00 250.00 12,500 15,000 1.50 -- - - D 16 2,500 D 16 - 17 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 17 2,500 D 17 - 18 300.00 218.00 10,900 13,400 1.34 Village Road + Canal 32.00 1,600 0.16 D 18 2,500 D 18 - 19 260.00 210.00 10,500 13,000 1.30 -- - - D 19 2,500 D 19 - 20 350.00 276.00 13,800 16,300 1.63 Drain + Minor Canal 24.00 1,200 0.12 D 20 2,500 D 20 - 21 340.00 290.00 14,500 17,000 1.70 -- - - D 21 2,500 D 21 - 22 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 22 2,500 D 22 - 23 356.22 306.22 15,311 17,811 1.78 -- - - D 23 2,500 D 23 - 24 350.00 292.00 14,600 17,100 1.71 Choti Road 8.00 400 0.04 D 24 2,500 D 24 - 25 330.00 280.00 14,000 16,500 1.65 -- - - D 25 2,500 D 25 - 26 350.00 288.00 14,400 16,900 1.69 Minor Canal 12.00 600 0.06 D 26 2,500 D 26 - 27 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 27 2,500 D 27 - 28 270.00 208.00 10,400 12,900 1.29 Minor Canal 12.00 600 0.06 D 28 2,500 D 28 - 29 318.41 268.41 13,421 15,921 1.59 -- - - D 29 2,500 D 29 - 30 350.00 282.00 14,100 16,600 1.66 Drain 18.00 900 0.09 D 30 2,500 D 30 - 31 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 31 2,500 D 31 - 32 340.00 290.00 14,500 17,000 1.70 -- - - D 32 2,500 D 32 - 33 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 33 2,500 D 33 - 34 300.00 250.00 12,500 15,000 1.50 -- - - D 34 2,500 D 34 - 35 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 35 2,500 D 35 - 36 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 36 2,500 D 36 - 37 330.00 280.00 14,000 16,500 1.65 -- - - D 37 2,500 D 37 - 38 308.49 258.49 12,925 15,425 1.54 -- - - D 38 2,500 D 38 - 39 350.00 285.00 14,250 16,750 1.68 Minor Canal 15.00 750 0.08 D 39 2,500 D 39 - 40 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 40 2,500 D 40 - 41 350.00 288.00 14,400 16,900 1.69 Rural Access Road 12.00 600 0.06 D 41 2,500 D 41 - 42 360.00 280.00 14,000 16,500 1.65 Canal Distributary 30.00 1,500 0.15 D 42 2,500 D 42 - 43 360.00 310.00 15,500 18,000 1.80 -- - - D 43 2,500 D 43 - 44 360.00 310.00 15,500 18,000 1.80 -- - - D 44 2,500 D 44 - 45 346.72 296.72 14,836 17,336 1.73 -- - - D 45 2,500 D 45 - 46 280.00 230.00 11,500 14,000 1.40 -- - - D 46 2,500 D 46 - 47 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 47 2,500 D 47 - 48 290.00 119.00 5,950 8,450 0.85 D.G.& Kachhi Canals 121.00 6,050 0.61 D 48 2,500 D 48 - 49 290.00 37.00 1,850 4,350 0.44 Govt. Rangeland 203.00 10,150 1.02 D 49 - D 49 - 50 287.44 - - - - Govt. Rangeland 237.44 11,872 1.19 D 50 - D 50 - 51 260.00 - - - - Govt. Rangeland 210.00 10,500 1.05 D 51 - D 51 - 52 273.55 - - - - Govt. Rangeland 223.55 11,178 1.12 D 52 - D 52 - 55 270.00 - - - - Govt. Rangeland 220.00 11,000 1.10 D 55 - D 55 - End 60.00 - - - - Govt. Rangeland 10.00 500 0.05 D 01-55 120,000 sub-total (c): 17,309.44 13,157.45 657,873 777,873 77.79 - 1,502 75,100 7.51 A 1-D 55 150,000 TOTAL 20,682 15,964 798,207 948,207 94.82 - 1,518 75,900 7.59 Total Affected Land (Towers+Line): 1,098,207 109.82

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 44

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table A-2: List of Affected Farmers by New Towers and Transmission Line for 500kV Sub-Station at D. G. Khan

Name of Parent Tower (50mx50m) T. Line (50m Wide) Total Affected Area No. Name of Affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet VillageTower No. Number Area (m2) Length (m) Area (m2) Sq. Meters Hectares (A) Incoming Single Circuit Transmission Line (Existing 500kV Transmission Line to First Double Circuit Tower): 1 Ghulam Farid s/o Muma Khan Qureshiwala Aaliwala A-1 1 2,500 209.05 10,453 12,953 1.30 2 Abdul Aziz s/o Khan Mohd Qureshiwala Aaliwala A-2 1 2,500 157.00 7,850 10,350 1.04 3 Jamal Mohamad s/o Deen M. Samundriwala Aaliwala A-2 - A-3 0 - 96.00 4,800 4,800 0.48 4 Allah Wasaya s/o Gul Mohd Samundriwala Aaliwala A-2 - A-3 0 - 67.00 3,350 3,350 0.34 5 Ghulam Mohd s/o Mawa Khan Samundriwala Aaliwala A-2 - A-3 0 - 87.00 4,350 4,350 0.44 6 Fateh Karim s/o Allah Wasaya Shahwala Aaliwala A-2 - A-3 0 - 65.00 3,250 3,250 0.33 7 Nazir Ahmad s/o Fateh Deen Shahwala Aaliwala A-3 1 2,500 131.00 6,550 9,050 0.91 8 Abdul Karim s/o Khair Mohd Shahwala Aaliwala A-3 - A-4 0 - 124.00 6,200 6,200 0.62 9 Ghaus Bux s/o Mohd Eisa Shahwala Aaliwala A-4 1 2,500 163.00 8,150 10,650 1.07 10 Ahmad Khan s/o Faiz Mohd Aliwala Aaliwala A-4 - A-5 0 - 74.00 3,700 3,700 0.37 11 Saifullah Khan s/o Faiz Mohd Madanwal Aaliwala A-5 + A-6 2 5,000 216.52 10,826 15,826 1.58 12 Haji M. Sharif s/o Gh. Haider Madanwal Aaliwala A-6 - D-01 1 2,500 27.00 1,350 3,850 0.39 Sub-Total (a): Incoming Line: A-1 - D-01 7 17,500 1,416.57 70,829 88,329 8.83 (B) Outgoing Single Circuit Transmission Line (First Double Circuit Tower to Existing 500kV Transmission Line): 13 Javed s/o Ghulam Qadir Madanwal Aaliwala D 01 - B-1 0 - 48.50 2,425 2,425 0.24 14 Ismail Khan s/o Mohd Khan Madanwal Aaliwala D 01 - B-1 0 - 96.00 4,800 4,800 0.48 15 Ishaq Khan s/o Jamal Khan Madanwal Aaliwala B-1 1 2,500 86.62 4,331 6,831 0.68 16 Abdul Rahim s/o Gh. Hasan Kot Chhota Aaliwala B-2 1 2,500 272.00 13,600 16,100 1.61 17 Mian Zaman s/o Mian Tufail Kot Chhota Aaliwala B-3 + B-4 2 5,000 512.00 25,600 30,600 3.06 18 Mohd Ajmal s/o Ahmad Bux Sherwala Aaliwala B-5 1 2,500 197.00 9,850 12,350 1.24 19 Khuda Bux s/o Ahmad Bux Sherwala Aaliwala B-6 1 2,500 178.00 8,900 11,400 1.14 Sub-Total (b): Outgoing Line: D 01 - B-6 6 15,000 1,390.12 69,506 84,506 8.45 (D) New Double Circuit Transmission Line (Incoming/Outgoing Transmission Line to New 500kV Grid Station): 20 Elahi Bux s/o Allah Bux Madanwala Aaliwala D 02 1 2,500 267.00 13,350 15,850 1.59 21 Allah Devia s/o Elahi Bux Gabulwala Aaliwala D 03 1 2,500 324.04 16,202 18,702 1.87 22 Rahmat Khosa s/o Khurshid Gabulwala Aaliwala D 04 - D 07 4 10,000 982.00 49,100 59,100 5.91 23 Altaf Muhasjir s/o Mubarik Ali Banglewala Paigan D 08 1 2,500 137.00 6,850 9,350 0.94 24 Ghluam Haider s/o Gh. Rasool Banglewala Paigan D 08 - D 09 0 - 83.00 4,150 4,150 0.42 25 Ghulam Akbar s/o Gh Rasool Banglewala Paigan D 08 - D 09 0 - 62.00 3,100 3,100 0.31 26 Jind Wada s/o Jamal Banglewala Paigan D 08 - D 09 0 - 68.00 3,400 3,400 0.34 27 Amanullah s/o Ghulam Mohd Banglewala Paigan D 09 1 2,500 127.00 6,350 8,850 0.89 28 Iqbal Khan s/o Gamar Khan Banglewala Paigan D 09 - D 10 0 - 272.00 13,600 13,600 1.36 29 Mohd Yaar s/o Gai Khan Banglewala Paigan D 10 1 2,500 260.00 13,000 15,500 1.55 30 Ghulam Haider s/o Jind Wada Banglewala Paigan D 11 - D 12 2 5,000 528.00 26,400 31,400 3.14 31 Naseer s/o Imam Bux Banglewala Paigan D 13 1 2,500 321.50 16,075 18,575 1.86 32 Ghulam Ali s/o Haji Hasan Paigan Paigan D 14 1 2,500 324.07 16,204 18,704 1.87 33 Rahim Bux s/o Haji Hasan Paigan Paigan D 15 1 2,500 112.00 5,600 8,100 0.81 34 Nasar Khan s/o Haji Hasan Paigan Paigan D 15 - D 16 0 - 64.00 3,200 3,200 0.32 35 Amanullah s/o Ramzan Paigan Paigan D 15 - D 16 0 - 123.00 6,150 6,150 0.62 36 Farooq s/o Hamid Khan Paigan Paigan D 16 1 2,500 276.00 13,800 16,300 1.63 37 Wazir s/o Yaar Mohammad Paigan Paigan D 16 - D 17 0 - 221.00 11,050 11,050 1.11 38 Bilal Akbar s/o Ghulam Qasim Paigan Paigan D 17 - D 19 3 7,500 584.00 29,200 36,700 3.67 39 Jan Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim Paigan Paigan D 20 - D 22 3 7,500 692.22 34,611 42,111 4.21 40 Aoun Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim Paigan Paigan D 23 - D 28 6 15,000 1,039.41 51,971 66,971 6.70 41 Zulqarnain s/o Ghulam Qasim Paigan Paigan D 29 1 2,500 288.00 14,400 16,900 1.69 42 Mohammad Ali s/o Ahmad Khan Godhpur Gadai D 30 1 2,500 310.00 15,500 18,000 1.80 43 Kaurha s/o Hayat Sushani Godhpur Gadai D 30 - D 31 0 - 176.00 8,800 8,800 0.88 44 Ghulam Husain s/o Musa Khan Chit Sarkani Gadai D 31 1 2,500 206.00 10,300 12,800 1.28 45 Abdul Karim s/o Musa Khan Chit Sarkani Gadai D 31 - D 32 0 - 194.00 9,700 9,700 0.97 46 Ghulam Shabir s/o Mohd Bux Chit Sarkani Gadai D 31 - D 32 0 - 137.00 6,850 6,850 0.69 47 Raheem Sarkani s/o Abdullah Chit Sarkani Gadai D 32 1 2,500 278.00 13,900 16,400 1.64 48 Manzoor Sarkani s/o Mohd Bux Chit Sarkani Gadai D 32 - D 33 0 - 270.00 13,500 13,500 1.35 49 Mohd Husain s/o Elahi Bux Chit Sarkani Gadai D 33 1 2,500 187.00 9,350 11,850 1.19 50 Abbas Khan s/o Gumman Khan Chit Sarkani Gadai D 33 - D 34 0 - 302.00 15,100 15,100 1.51 51 Ibrahim Aliani s/o Sulaiman Chit Sarkani Gadai D 34 1 2,500 295.00 14,750 17,250 1.73 52 Mohd Husain s/o Wali Mohd Chit Sarkani Gadai D 34 - D 35 0 - 284.00 14,200 14,200 1.42 53 Mohd Kamal s/o Miru Khan Chit Sarkani Gadai D 35 - D 37 3 7,500 562.49 28,125 35,625 3.56 54 Hazara Khan s/o Miru Khan Chit Sarkani Gadai D 38 1 2,500 306.00 15,300 17,800 1.78 55 Kasmia Khan s/o Sangar Khan Chit Sarkani Gadai D 39 - D 40 2 5,000 416.00 20,800 25,800 2.58 56 Jan Mohammad s/o Sher Khan Chit Sarkani Gadai D 40 - D 41 0 - 102.00 5,100 5,100 0.51 57 Elahi Bux s/o Janan Khan Chit Sarkani Gadai D 40 - D 41 0 - 147.00 7,350 7,350 0.74 58 Allah Wasaya s/o Sarang Khan Chit Sarkani Gadai D 40 - D 41 0 - 152.00 7,600 7,600 0.76 59 Jalal Khan s/o Miran Khan Chit Dagar Gadai D 41 1 2,500 305.00 15,250 17,750 1.78 60 Chandi Khan s/o Lal Deen Chit Dagar Gadai D 42 1 2,500 308.00 15,400 17,900 1.79 61 Ghulam Haider s/o Sumbal Khan Chit Dagar Gadai D 43 - D 44 2 5,000 426.72 21,336 26,336 2.63 62 Mohd Eisa s/o Sumbal Khan Chit Dagar Gadai D 45 1 2,500 213.00 10,650 13,150 1.32 63 Allah Dad Sarkani Chit Dagar Gadai D 46 1 2,500 263.00 13,150 15,650 1.57 64 Abdul Aziz s/o Allah Ditta Chit Dagar Gadai D 47 - D 48 2 5,000 162.00 8,100 13,100 1.31 Sub-Total (c): Double Circuit Line: D 02 - D 48 47 117,500 13,157.45 657,873 775,373 77.54 TOTAL: (A+B+D) 60 150,000 15,964 798,207 948,207 94.82

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 45

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table A-3: Percentage Affected Land by New Transmission Line for D. G. Khan Working Table A-3: Percentage Affected Land by New Transmission Line for D. G. Khan Subproject Name of Total Farmland Affected Land No. Name of Affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Acres Hectares Hectares Percentage (A) Incoming Single Circuit Transmission Line: 1 Ghulam Farid s/o Muma Khan Qureshiwala 50.0 20.24 1.30 6.40 2 Abdul Aziz s/o Khan Mohd Qureshiwala 42.5 17.21 1.04 6.02 3 Jamal Mohamad s/o Deen M. Samundriwala 25.0 10.12 0.48 4.74 4 Allah Wasaya s/o Gul Mohd Samundriwala 25.0 10.12 0.34 3.31 5 Ghulam Mohd s/o Mawa Khan Samundriwala 25.0 10.12 0.44 4.30 6 Fateh Karim s/o Allah Wasaya Shahwala 12.5 5.06 0.33 6.42 7 Nazir Ahmad s/o Fateh Deen Shahwala 25.0 10.12 0.91 8.94 8 Abdul Karim s/o Khair Mohd Shahwala 25.0 10.12 0.62 6.13 9 Ghaus Bux s/o Mohd Eisa Shahwala 42.0 17.00 1.07 6.26 10 Ahmad Khan s/o Faiz Mohd Aliwala 25.0 10.12 0.37 3.66 11 Saifullah Khan s/o Faiz Mohd Madanwal 50.0 20.24 1.58 7.82 12 Haji M. Sharif s/o Gh. Haider Madanwal 25.0 10.12 0.39 3.80 Sub-Total (a): Incoming Line: 372.00 150.61 8.83 67.79 Average Per Affected Farmer (N=12): 31.00 12.55 0.74 5.65 (B) Outgoing Single Circuit Transmission Line: 13 Javed s/o Ghulam Qadir Madanwal 25.0 10.12 0.24 2.40 14 Ismail Khan s/o Mohd Khan Madanwal 25.0 10.12 0.48 4.74 15 Ishaq Khan s/o Jamal Khan Madanwal 25.0 10.12 0.68 6.75 16 Abdul Rahim s/o Gh. Hasan Kot Chhota 50.0 20.24 1.61 7.95 17 Mian Zaman s/o Mian Tufail Kot Chhota 96.0 38.87 3.06 7.87 18 Mohd Ajmal s/o Ahmad Bux Sherwala 50.0 20.24 1.24 6.10 19 Khuda Bux s/o Ahmad Bux Sherwala 50.0 20.24 1.14 5.63 Sub-Total (b): Outgoing Line: 321.0 130.0 8.45 41.4 Average Per Affected Farmer (N=07): 45.86 18.57 1.21 5.92 (D) Double Circuit Transmission Line: 20 Elahi Bux s/o Allah Bux Madanwala 75.0 30.36 1.59 5.22 21 Allah Devia s/o Elahi Bux Gabulwala 75.0 30.36 1.87 6.16 22 Rahmat Khosa s/o Khurshid Gabulwala 250.0 101.21 5.91 5.84 23 Altaf Muhasjir s/o Mubarik Ali Banglewala 50.0 20.24 0.94 4.62 24 Ghluam Haider s/o Gh. Rasool Banglewala 25.0 10.12 0.42 4.10 25 Ghulam Akbar s/o Gh Rasool Banglewala 12.5 5.06 0.31 6.13 26 Jind Wada s/o Jamal Banglewala 12.5 5.06 0.34 6.72 27 Amanullah s/o Ghulam Mohd Banglewala 37.5 15.18 0.89 5.83 28 Iqbal Khan s/o Gamar Khan Banglewala 45.0 18.21 1.36 7.47 29 Mohd Yaar s/o Gai Khan Banglewala 72.0 29.15 1.55 5.32 30 Ghulam Haider s/o Jind Wada Banglewala 112.5 45.55 3.14 6.89 31 Naseer s/o Imam Bux Banglewala 82.0 33.20 1.86 5.60 32 Ghulam Ali s/o Haji Hasan Paigan 120.0 48.58 1.87 3.85 33 Rahim Bux s/o Haji Hasan Paigan 37.5 15.18 0.81 5.34 34 Nasar Khan s/o Haji Hasan Paigan 32.5 13.16 0.32 2.43 35 Amanullah s/o Ramzan Paigan 72.0 29.15 0.62 2.11 36 Farooq s/o Hamid Khan Paigan 62.5 25.30 1.63 6.44 37 Wazir s/o Yaar Mohammad Paigan 92.5 37.45 1.11 2.95 38 Bilal Akbar s/o Ghulam Qasim Paigan 145.0 58.70 3.67 6.25 39 Jan Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim Paigan 150.0 60.73 4.21 6.93 40 Aoun Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim Paigan 250.0 101.21 6.70 6.62 41 Zulqarnain s/o Ghulam Qasim Paigan 50.0 20.24 1.69 8.35 42 Mohammad Ali s/o Ahmad Khan Godhpur 50.0 20.24 1.80 8.89 43 Kaurha s/o Hayat Sushani Godhpur 37.5 15.18 0.88 5.80 44 Ghulam Husain s/o Musa Khan Chit Sarkani 50.0 20.24 1.28 6.32 45 Abdul Karim s/o Musa Khan Chit Sarkani 45.0 18.21 0.97 5.33 46 Ghulam Shabir s/o Mohd Bux Chit Sarkani 50.0 20.24 0.69 3.38 47 Raheem Sarkani s/o Abdullah Chit Sarkani 50.0 20.24 1.64 8.10 48 Manzoor Sarkani s/o Mohd Bux Chit Sarkani 62.5 25.30 1.35 5.34 49 Mohd Husain s/o Elahi Bux Chit Sarkani 45.0 18.21 1.19 6.51 50 Abbas Khan s/o Gumman Khan Chit Sarkani 72.0 29.15 1.51 5.18 51 Ibrahim Aliani s/o Sulaiman Chit Sarkani 60.0 24.29 1.73 7.10 52 Mohd Husain s/o Wali Mohd Chit Sarkani 64.0 25.91 1.42 5.48 53 Mohd Kamal s/o Miru Khan Chit Sarkani 125.0 50.61 3.56 7.04 54 Hazara Khan s/o Miru Khan Chit Sarkani 75.0 30.36 1.78 5.86 55 Kasmia Khan s/o Sangar Khan Chit Sarkani 150.0 60.73 2.58 4.25 56 Jan Mohammad s/o Sher Khan Chit Sarkani 50.0 20.24 0.51 2.52 57 Elahi Bux s/o Janan Khan Chit Sarkani 40.0 16.19 0.74 4.54 58 Allah Wasaya s/o Sarang Khan Chit Sarkani 50.0 20.24 0.76 3.75 59 Jalal Khan s/o Miran Khan Chit Dagar 75.0 30.36 1.78 5.85 60 Chandi Khan s/o Lal Deen Chit Dagar 62.5 25.30 1.79 7.07 61 Ghulam Haider s/o Sumbal KhanChit Dagar 125.0 50.61 2.63 5.20 62 Mohd Eisa s/o Sumbal Khan Chit Dagar 62.5 25.30 1.32 5.20 63 Allah Dad Sarkani Chit Dagar 75.0 30.36 1.57 5.15 64 Abdul Aziz s/o Allah Ditta Chit Dagar 62.5 25.30 1.31 5.18 Sub-Total (c): Double Circuit Line: 3,399.4 1,376.3 77.54 250.20 Average Per Affected Farmer (N=45): 75.54 30.58 1.72 5.56 SUM TOTAL (a+b+c): 4,092.42 1,656.85 94.82 359.44 Average Per Affected Farmer (N=64): 63.94 25.89 1.48 5.62

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 46

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Working Table A-4: Type and Table A4: Number of Affected Trees in 500kV DG Khan Subproject

Working Table A-4: Type and Number of Affected Trees in 500kV DG Khan Subproject (Within 30m Wide Corridor - Righ of Way) Tower Nos. Fruit Trees Wood Trees* (From-To) Dates Mango Shisham Sirin Kikar Toot Poplar Total No. A: Incoming Single Circuit Line (From 500kV Guddu-Multan Transmission Line): A 1-2 1 - - - 2 1 - 4 A 2-3 6 - 7 2 5 - - 20 A 3-4 9 - 13 5 - - - 27 A 4-5 3 - 3 2 2 - 4 14 A 5-6 2 - - 2 - 2 - 6 A 6 - D 01 3 - 2 3 - 3 - 11 sub-total (a): 24 0 25 14 9 6 4 82 B: Outgoing Single Circuit Line (To 500kV Guddu-Multan Transmission Line): D 01 - B 1 4 - 2 3 3 - - 12 B 1 - 2 3 - 4 1 2 - - 10 B 2 - 3 4 - 2 2 - 3 - 11 B 3 - 4 - - 4 4 2 - - 10 B 4 - 5- - - 231 5 11 B 5 - 6 5 3 2 - 1 - 3 14 sub-total (b): 16 3 14 12 11 4 8 68 D: Double Circuit (Incoming & Outgoing Lines to Grid Station): D 01 - 02 4 - 1 5 2 1 - 13 D 02 - 03 8 - 2 5 3 2 - 20 D 03 - 04 3 - 3 4 2 - 2 14 D 04 - 05 - - 1 1 - - - 2 D 05 - 06 - - 1 - 1 1 - 3 D 06 - 07 - - 3 2 - - - 5 D 07 - 08 1 - 3 - 2 - - 6 D 08 - 09 3 - 3 2 - 2 - 10 D 09 - 10 - - 3 1 1 - - 5 D 10 - 11 4 - 5 - 4 3 - 16 D 11 - 12 4 6 3 2 - - - 15 D 12 - 13 3 - 9 1 - - - 13 D 13 - 14 1 - 1 2 6 - - 10 D 14 - 15 1 - 3 2 - - - 6 D 15 - 16 1 - 1 1 - - - 3 D 16 - 17 1 - 2 2 - - - 5 D 17 - 18 - - 3 - 3 1 - 7 D 18 - 19 4 - 3 2 - - 2 11 D 19 - 20 1 - 2 - 1 - 3 7 D 20 - 21 2 - 4 - 2 1 - 9 D 21 - 22 - - 5 1 - - 2 8 D 22 - 23 2 - 3 - 1 1 - 7 D 23 - 24 1 - 1 2 1 - - 5 D 24 - 25 3 - 1 3 - 1 - 8 D 25 - 26 - - 3 - - - - 3 D 26 - 27 - - 2 - 1 2 - 5 D 27 - 28 - - 5 - - 1 - 6 D 28 - 29 - - 2 - - 3 - 5 D 29 - 30 1 - 1 3 - 2 - 7 D 30 - 31 3 - - 2 - 1 - 6 D 31 - 32 - - 4 - - 4 - 8 D 32 - 33 2 - 3 3 2 1 - 11 D 33 - 34 - - 7 - - - - 7 D 34 - 35 - - 2 6 - 2 - 10 D 35 - 36 4 - - 3 - 1 - 8 D 36 - 37 2 - 7 - - 2 - 11 D 37 - 38 3 2 - 5 - 3 - 13 D 38 - 39 - - 2 3 - 2 2 9 D 39 - 40 - - 5 1 - 2 1 9 D 40 - 41 - - 2 5 - 3 - 10 D 41 - 42 3 - - 4 3 1 - 11 D 42 - 43 2 1 1 3 - 1 - 8 D 43 - 44 - - 2 2 - 2 1 7 D 44 - 45 - - 5 1 - 2 2 10 D 45 - 46 - - 1 5 - 1 - 7 D 46 - 47 1 - - 2 1 - 1 5 D 47 - 48 2 - - 1 - 2 - 5 D 48 - 49** - - 1 - 1 1 - 3 D 49 - 50** ------0 D 50 - 51** ------0 D 51 - 52** ------0 D 52 - 55** ------0 D 55 - End** ------0 sub-total (c): 70 9 121 87 37 52 16 392 TOTAL (a+b+c): 110 12 160 113 57 62 28 542 * Botanical Names: Shisham = Sisso ; Sirin = Albizia Lebbek ; Kikar = Acacia Nicolta ; Toot = Mulberry . ** 120m from Tower 48 to End is the Govt. Range Land with 25-30% covered by shrub species; No Trees.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 47

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table A-5: Sector-Wise Income of Affected Households 500kV Transmission Line at D. G. Khan Sub-Station Working Table A-5: Sector-Wise Income of Affected Households 500kV Transmission Line at D. G. Khan Grid Station Affected Person (AP) Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000") AP EmploymentSmall Business Agriculture (Net) Total Income (Rs. "000") No.Name of Household Head Men Women Men Wmn Men Wmn Men Wmn Overall (A) Incoming Single Circuit Transmission Line: 1 Ghulam Farid s/o Muma Khan - - 36.0 - 107.5 - 143.5 - 143.5 2 Abdul Aziz s/o Khan Mohd 36.0 30.0 - - 84.0 36.0 120.0 66.0 186.0 3 Jamal Mohamad s/o Deen M. - - - - 84.0 42.0 84.0 72.0 156.0 4 Allah Wasaya s/o Gul Mohd - - - 24.0 84.0 - 84.0 24.0 108.0 5 Ghulam Mohd s/o Mawa Khan - - 72.0 - 126.0 - 198.0 - 198.0 6 Fateh Karim s/o Allah Wasaya 66.0 36.0 - 12.0 42.0 48.0 108.0 96.0 204.0 7 Nazir Ahmad s/o Fateh Deen - - - - 107.5 - 107.5 - 107.5 8 Abdul Karim s/o Khair Mohd - 24.0 - 36.0 107.5 - 107.5 60.0 167.5 9 Ghaus Bux s/o Mohd Eisa - - - - 126.0 - 126.0 - 126.0 10 Ahmad Khan s/o Faiz Mohd - 30.0 66.0 - 84.0 - 150.0 30.0 180.0 11 Saifullah Khan s/o Faiz Mohd 48.0 - - - 107.5 - 155.5 - 155.5 12 Haji M. Sharif s/o Gh. Haider 42.0 - - - 126.0 - 168.0 - 168.0 Sub-Total (a): Incoming Line: 192.0 120.0 138.0 72.0 1,186.2 126.0 1,408.7 348.0 1,756.7 Sector-Wise Percentage (Men:Wmn): 61.5 38.5 65.7 34.3 90.4 9.6 80.2 19.8 100.0 (B) Outgoing Single Circuit Transmission Line: 13 Javed s/o Ghulam Qadir 45.0 24.0 54.0 - 42.0 24.0 141.0 48.0 189.0 14 Ismail Khan s/o Mohd Khan - 36.0 36.0 - 50.4 - 86.4 36.0 122.4 15 Ishaq Khan s/o Jamal Khan - - 36.0 - 84.0 18.0 120.0 18.0 138.0 16 Abdul Rahim s/o Gh. Hasan 42.0 - - - 141.1 - 183.1 - 183.1 17 Mian Zaman s/o Mian Tufail - 36.0 - - 252.0 - 252.0 36.0 288.0 18 Mohd Ajmal s/o Ahmad Bux - - - - 107.5 - 107.5 - 107.5 19 Khuda Bux s/o Ahmad Bux - - 30.0 - 168.0 30.0 198.0 30.0 228.0 Sub-Total (b): Outgoing Line: 87.0 96.0 156.0 - 845.1 72.0 1,088.1 168.0 1,256.1 Sector-Wise Percentage (Men:Wmn): 47.5 52.5 100.0 - 92.1 7.9 86.6 13.4 100.0 (D) Double Circuit Transmission Line: 20 Elahi Bux s/o Allah Bux 42.0 - - - 161.3 - 203.3 - 203.3 21 Allah Devia s/o Elahi Bux - 30.0 - - 168.0 - 168.0 30.0 198.0 22 Rahmat Khosa s/o Khurshid - - - - 504.0 - 504.0 - 504.0 23 Altaf Muhasjir s/o Mubarik Ali - - 60.0 15.0 126.0 - 186.0 24.0 210.0 24 Ghluam Haider s/o Gh. Rasool - - - - 75.6 30.0 75.6 30.0 105.6 25 Ghulam Akbar s/o Gh Rasool 30.0 - - - 42.0 42.0 72.0 42.0 114.0 26 Jind Wada s/o Jamal - - - 6.0 42.0 36.0 42.0 42.0 84.0 27 Amanullah s/o Ghulam Mohd - 42.0 - - 126.0 - 126.0 42.0 168.0 28 Iqbal Khan s/o Gamar Khan - - - - 151.1 - 151.1 - 151.1 29 Mohd Yaar s/o Gai Khan - - - - 241.9 - 241.9 - 241.9 30 Ghulam Haider s/o Jind Wada - - - - 378.0 - 378.0 - 378.0 31 Naseer s/o Imam Bux 72.0 - - - 275.5 - 347.5 - 347.5 32 Ghulam Ali s/o Haji Hasan - - - - 403.2 - 403.2 - 403.2 33 Rahim Bux s/o Haji Hasan - 30.0 - - 126.0 - 126.0 30.0 156.0 34 Nasar Khan s/o Haji Hasan - - - - 109.2 - 109.2 - 109.2 35 Amanullah s/o Ramzan - - - - 241.9 - 241.9 - 241.9 36 Farooq s/o Hamid Khan - - - - 210.0 - 210.0 - 210.0 37 Wazir s/o Yaar Mohammad - 36.0 - - 310.8 - 310.8 36.0 346.8 38 Bilal Akbar s/o Ghulam Qasim 66.0 - - - 487.2 - 553.2 - 553.2 39 Jan Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim - - - - 504.0 - 504.0 - 504.0 40 Aoun Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim - - - - 840.1 - 840.1 - 840.1 41 Zulqarnain s/o Ghulam Qasim - - 54.0 - 151.2 - 205.2 - 205.2 42 Mohammad Ali s/o Ahmad Khan - - - - 161.3 12.0 161.3 12.0 173.3 43 Kaurha s/o Hayat Sushani - 15.0 - - 126.0 - 126.0 42.0 168.0 44 Ghulam Husain s/o Musa Khan - 30.0 - - 168.0 - 168.0 30.0 198.0 45 Abdul Karim s/o Musa Khan - - - - 151.1 18.0 151.1 18.0 169.1 46 Ghulam Shabir s/o Mohd Bux - - - - 168.0 - 168.0 - 168.0 47 Raheem Sarkani s/o Abdullah - - - - 168.0 - 168.0 - 168.0 48 Manzoor Sarkani s/o Mohd Bux - - - - 210.0 - 210.0 - 210.0 49 Mohd Husain s/o Elahi Bux - - 24.0 12.0 151.1 - 175.1 36.0 211.1 50 Abbas Khan s/o Gumman Khan - - - - 241.9 - 241.9 - 241.9 51 Ibrahim Aliani s/o Sulaiman - - - - 201.6 - 201.6 - 201.6 52 Mohd Husain s/o Wali Mohd - - - - 215.1 - 215.1 - 215.1 53 Mohd Kamal s/o Miru Khan 42.0 15.0 - - 378.0 - 420.0 24.0 444.0 54 Hazara Khan s/o Miru Khan - - - - 208.3 - 208.3 - 208.3 55 Kasmia Khan s/o Sangar Khan - - - - 462.0 - 462.0 - 462.0 56 Jan Mohammad s/o Sher Khan - - - - 126.0 - 126.0 - 126.0 57 Elahi Bux s/o Janan Khan - - - - 134.4 - 134.4 - 134.4 58 Allah Wasaya s/o Sarang Khan - - - - 168.0 - 168.0 - 168.0 59 Jalal Khan s/o Miran Khan - 42.0 - - 210.0 - 210.0 60.0 270.0 60 Chandi Khan s/o Lal Deen - - - - 218.4 - 218.4 - 218.4 61 Gh. Haider s/o Sumbal Khan 36.0 - - - 310.8 - 346.8 - 346.8 62 Mohd Eisa s/o Sumbal Khan - - - - 201.6 - 201.6 - 201.6 63 Allah Dad Sarkani - - - 12.0 168.0 - 168.0 12.0 180.0 64 Abdul Aziz s/o Allah Ditta 36.0 24.0 - - 84.0 30.0 120.0 54.0 174.0 Sub-Total (c): Double Circuit Line: 324.0 264.0 138.0 45.0 10,307.5 168.0 10,769.5 564.0 11,333.5 Sector-Wise Percentage (Men:Wmn): 55.1 44.9 75.4 24.6 98.4 1.6 95.0 5.0 100.0 OVERALL TOTAL: 603.0 480.0 432.0 117.0 12,338.8 366.0 13,373.8 963.0 14,336.8 Sector-Wise Percentage (Men:Wmn): 55.7 44.3 78.7 21.3 97.1 2.9 93.3 6.7 100.0 Sector Totals / Averages : 1,083.0 16.92 549.0 8.58 12,704.8 198.5 14,336.8 224.0 Sector Percentages: 7.55 3.83 88.62 100.00

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 48

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table A-6: Per Capita Income of Affected Farmers by New 500kV Transmission Line for D. G. Khan

Working Table A-6: Per Capita Income of Affected Farmers by New 500kV Transmission Line for D. G. Kha HH Size Total Income Per Capita Income (Rs./Person) No. Name of Affected Farmer (HHH) (Persons) (Rs./HH/Year) Annual Monthly Daily (A) Incoming Single Circuit Transmission Line: 1 Ghulam Farid s/o Muma Khan 11 143,530 13,048 1,087 35.75 2 Abdul Aziz s/o Khan Mohd 12 186,008 15,501 1,292 42.47 3 Jamal Mohamad s/o Deen M. 13 156,008 12,001 1,000 32.88 4 Allah Wasaya s/o Gul Mohd 9 108,008 12,001 1,000 32.88 5 Ghulam Mohd s/o Mawa Khan 14 198,012 14,144 1,179 38.75 6 Fateh Karim s/o Allah Wasaya 12 204,004 17,000 1,417 46.58 7 Nazir Ahmad s/o Fateh Deen 8 107,530 13,441 1,120 36.83 8 Abdul Karim s/o Khair Mohd 14 167,530 11,966 997 32.78 9 Ghaus Bux s/o Mohd Eisa 10 126,012 12,601 1,050 34.52 10 Ahmad Khan s/o Faiz Mohd 12 180,008 15,001 1,250 41.10 11 Saifullah Khan s/o Faiz Mohd 11 155,530 14,139 1,178 38.74 12 Haji M. Sharif s/o Gh. Haider 10 168,012 16,801 1,400 46.03 Sum Total (a): 136 1,900,194 167,644 13,970 459.30 Average (a): 11.33 158,350 13,970 1,164.20 38.27 (B) Outgoing Single Circuit Transmission Line: 13 Javed s/o Ghulam Qadir 12 188,998 15,750 1,312 43.15 14 Ismail Khan s/o Mohd Khan 9 122,405 13,601 1,133 37.26 15 Ishaq Khan s/o Jamal Khan 12 138,008 11,501 958 31.51 16 Abdul Rahim s/o Gh. Hasan 14 183,134 13,081 1,090 35.84 17 Mian Zaman s/o Mian Tufail 16 288,024 18,002 1,500 49.32 18 Mohd Ajmal s/o Ahmad Bux 9 107,530 11,948 996 32.73 19 Khuda Bux s/o Ahmad Bux 17 228,016 13,413 1,118 36.75 Sum Total (b): 89 1,256,115 97,294 8,108 266.56 Average (b): 12.71 179,445 13,899 1,158 38.08 (D) New Double Circuit Transmission Line: 20 Elahi Bux s/o Allah Bux 12 203,296 16,941 1,412 46.41 21 Allah Devia s/o Elahi Bux 11 198,016 18,001 1,500 49.32 22 Rahmat Khosa s/o Khurshid 29 504,049 17,381 1,448 47.62 23 Altaf Muhasjir s/o Mubarik Ali 11 209,994 19,090 1,591 52.30 24 Ghluam Haider s/o Gh. Rasool 9 105,613 11,735 978 32.15 25 Ghulam Akbar s/o Gh Rasool 8 114,004 14,251 1,188 39.04 26 Jind Wada s/o Jamal 5 83,998 16,800 1,400 46.03 27 Amanullah s/o Ghulam Mohd 11 168,012 15,274 1,273 41.85 28 Iqbal Khan s/o Gamar Khan 10 151,143 15,114 1,260 41.41 29 Mohd Yaar s/o Gai Khan 14 241,943 17,282 1,440 47.35 30 Ghulam Haider s/o Jind Wada 19 378,036 19,897 1,658 54.51 31 Naseer s/o Imam Bux 16 347,547 21,722 1,810 59.51 32 Ghulam Ali s/o Haji Hasan 21 403,239 19,202 1,600 52.61 33 Rahim Bux s/o Haji Hasan 11 156,012 14,183 1,182 38.86 34 Nasar Khan s/o Haji Hasan 8 109,211 13,651 1,138 37.40 35 Amanullah s/o Ramzan 13 241,943 18,611 1,551 50.99 36 Farooq s/o Hamid Khan 10 210,020 21,002 1,750 57.54 37 Wazir s/o Yaar Mohammad 18 346,830 19,268 1,606 52.79 38 Bilal Akbar s/o Ghulam Qasim 27 553,247 20,491 1,708 56.14 39 Jan Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim 20 504,049 25,202 2,100 69.05 40 Aoun Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim 32 840,081 26,253 2,188 71.92 41 Zulqarnain s/o Ghulam Qasim 14 205,215 14,658 1,222 40.16 42 Mohammad Ali s/o Ahmad Khan 10 173,296 17,330 1,444 47.48 43 Kaurha s/o Hayat Sushani 7 167,994 23,999 2,000 65.75 44 Ghulam Husain s/o Musa Khan 9 198,016 22,002 1,833 60.28 45 Abdul Karim s/o Musa Khan 10 169,143 16,914 1,410 46.34 46 Ghulam Shabir s/o Mohd Bux 9 168,016 18,668 1,556 51.15 47 Raheem Sarkani s/o Abdullah 7 168,016 24,002 2,000 65.76 48 Manzoor Sarkani s/o Mohd Bux 10 210,020 21,002 1,750 57.54 49 Mohd Husain s/o Elahi Bux 13 211,143 16,242 1,353 44.50 50 Abbas Khan s/o Gumman Khan 12 241,943 20,162 1,680 55.24 51 Ibrahim Aliani s/o Sulaiman 10 201,619 20,162 1,680 55.24 52 Mohd Husain s/o Wali Mohd 12 215,061 17,922 1,493 49.10 53 Mohd Kamal s/o Miru Khan 18 444,036 24,669 2,056 67.59 54 Hazara Khan s/o Miru Khan 10 208,340 20,834 1,736 57.08 55 Kasmia Khan s/o Sangar Khan 21 462,045 22,002 1,834 60.28 56 Jan Mohammad s/o Sher Khan 6 125,994 20,999 1,750 57.53 57 Elahi Bux s/o Janan Khan 8 134,413 16,802 1,400 46.03 58 Allah Wasaya s/o Sarang Khan 9 167,992 18,666 1,555 51.14 59 Jalal Khan s/o Miran Khan 12 270,020 22,502 1,875 61.65 60 Chandi Khan s/o Lal Deen 10 218,421 21,842 1,820 59.84 61 Ghulam Haider s/o Sumbal Khan 16 346,830 21,677 1,806 59.39 62 Mohd Eisa s/o Sumbal Khan 11 201,619 18,329 1,527 50.22 63 Allah Dad Sarkani 12 180,016 15,001 1,250 41.10 64 Abdul Aziz s/o Allah Ditta 9 174,008 19,334 1,611 52.97 Sum Total (c): 580 11,333,500 857,070 71,422 2,348 Average (c ): 12.89 236,115 17,856 1,488 48.92 Overall Total: 805 14,489,810 1,122,008 93,501 3,074 Overall Average: 12.58 226,403 17,531 1,461 48.03

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 49

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table A-01: Land Affected by Construction of 500kV Transmission Lines under D.G. Khan Subproject Affected Private Land (Crop Compensation: Towers: 3 Crops; TL Corridor: 1 Crop) Affected Government Land (No Compensation) Land Under TowersTower Nos. Distance TL Corridor (50m wide) Total Land (Public Infrastructure: Length x 50m Width)) Tower No. Land (m2) (From-To) (Meters) Length (m) Area (m2) Sq. Meters Hectares Description Length Area (m2) Area (ha) A: Incoming Single Circuit New Transmission Line (From 500kV Guddu-Multan Transmission Line): A-1 2,500 A 1-2 254.05 229.05 11,453 13,953 1.40 -- - - A-2 2,500 A 2-3 320.00 260.00 13,000 15,500 1.55 Rajanpur Road 10.00 500 0.05 A-3 2,500 A 3-4 288.00 238.00 11,900 14,400 1.44 -- - - A-4 2,500 A 4-5 280.00 230.00 11,500 14,000 1.40 -- - - A-5 2,500 A 5-6 280.00 230.00 11,500 14,000 1.40 -- - - A-6 2,500 A 6 - D 01 279.52 229.52 11,476 13,976 1.40 -- - - A-1 - A-6 15,000 sub-total (a): 1,701.57 1,416.57 70,828.50 85,829 8.58 - 10.00 500 0.05 B: Outgoing Single Circuit Line (To 500kV Guddu-Multan Transmission Line): B-1 2,500 D 01 - B 1 277.73 227.73 11,387 13,887 1.39 -- - - B-2 2,500 B 1 - 2 300.00 250.00 12,500 15,000 1.50 -- - - B-3 2,500 B 2 - 3 270.31 214.31 10,716 13,216 1.32 Village Road 6.00 300 0.03 B-4 2,500 B 3 - 4 340.00 290.00 14,500 17,000 1.70 -- - - B-5 2,500 B 4 - 5 280.00 230.00 11,500 14,000 1.40 -- - - B-6 2,500 B 5 - 6 203.08 178.08 8,904 11,404 1.14 -- - - B-1 - B-6 15,000 sub-total (b): 1,671.12 1,390.12 69,506.00 84,506 8.45 - 6.00 300 0.03 D: Double Circuit (Incoming & Outgoing Lines to Grid Station): D 01 2,500 D 01 - 02 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 02 2,500 D 02 - 03 350.00 292.00 14,600 17,100 1.71 Aaliwala Road 8.00 400 0.04 D 03 2,500 D 03 - 04 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 04 2,500 D 04 - 05 351.04 301.04 15,052 17,552 1.76 -- - - D 05 2,500 D 05 - 06 300.00 244.00 12,200 14,700 1.47 Village Road 6.00 300 0.03 D 06 2,500 D 06 - 07 300.00 250.00 12,500 15,000 1.50 -- - - D 07 2,500 D 07 - 08 350.00 236.00 11,800 14,300 1.43 Indus Highway (N-55) 64.00 3,200 0.32 D 08 2,500 D 08 - 09 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 09 2,500 D 09 - 10 380.00 330.00 16,500 19,000 1.90 -- - - D 10 2,500 D 10 - 11 350.00 280.00 14,000 16,500 1.65 Ishoria Canal 20.00 1,000 0.10 D 11 2,500 D 11 - 12 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 12 2,500 D 12 - 13 360.00 310.00 15,500 18,000 1.80 -- - - D 13 2,500 D 13 - 14 377.57 327.57 16,379 18,879 1.89 -- - - D 14 2,500 D 14 - 15 350.00 284.00 14,200 16,700 1.67 Raliway Track 16.00 800 0.08 D 15 2,500 D 15 - 16 300.00 250.00 12,500 15,000 1.50 -- - - D 16 2,500 D 16 - 17 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 17 2,500 D 17 - 18 300.00 218.00 10,900 13,400 1.34 Village Road + Canal 32.00 1,600 0.16 D 18 2,500 D 18 - 19 260.00 210.00 10,500 13,000 1.30 -- - - D 19 2,500 D 19 - 20 350.00 276.00 13,800 16,300 1.63 Drain + Minor Canal 24.00 1,200 0.12 D 20 2,500 D 20 - 21 340.00 290.00 14,500 17,000 1.70 -- - - D 21 2,500 D 21 - 22 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 22 2,500 D 22 - 23 356.22 306.22 15,311 17,811 1.78 -- - - D 23 2,500 D 23 - 24 350.00 292.00 14,600 17,100 1.71 Choti Road 8.00 400 0.04 D 24 2,500 D 24 - 25 330.00 280.00 14,000 16,500 1.65 -- - - D 25 2,500 D 25 - 26 350.00 288.00 14,400 16,900 1.69 Minor Canal 12.00 600 0.06 D 26 2,500 D 26 - 27 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 27 2,500 D 27 - 28 270.00 208.00 10,400 12,900 1.29 Minor Canal 12.00 600 0.06 D 28 2,500 D 28 - 29 318.41 268.41 13,421 15,921 1.59 -- - - D 29 2,500 D 29 - 30 350.00 282.00 14,100 16,600 1.66 Drain 18.00 900 0.09 D 30 2,500 D 30 - 31 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 31 2,500 D 31 - 32 340.00 290.00 14,500 17,000 1.70 -- - - D 32 2,500 D 32 - 33 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 33 2,500 D 33 - 34 300.00 250.00 12,500 15,000 1.50 -- - - D 34 2,500 D 34 - 35 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 35 2,500 D 35 - 36 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 36 2,500 D 36 - 37 330.00 280.00 14,000 16,500 1.65 -- - - D 37 2,500 D 37 - 38 308.49 258.49 12,925 15,425 1.54 -- - - D 38 2,500 D 38 - 39 350.00 285.00 14,250 16,750 1.68 Minor Canal 15.00 750 0.08 D 39 2,500 D 39 - 40 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 40 2,500 D 40 - 41 350.00 288.00 14,400 16,900 1.69 Rural Access Road 12.00 600 0.06 D 41 2,500 D 41 - 42 360.00 280.00 14,000 16,500 1.65 Canal Distributary 30.00 1,500 0.15 D 42 2,500 D 42 - 43 360.00 310.00 15,500 18,000 1.80 -- - - D 43 2,500 D 43 - 44 360.00 310.00 15,500 18,000 1.80 -- - - D 44 2,500 D 44 - 45 346.72 296.72 14,836 17,336 1.73 -- - - D 45 2,500 D 45 - 46 280.00 230.00 11,500 14,000 1.40 -- - - D 46 2,500 D 46 - 47 350.00 300.00 15,000 17,500 1.75 -- - - D 47 2,500 D 47 - 48 290.00 119.00 5,950 8,450 0.85 D.G.& Kachhi Canals 121.00 6,050 0.61 D 48 2,500 D 48 - 49 290.00 37.00 1,850 4,350 0.44 Govt. Rangeland 203.00 10,150 1.02 D 49 - D 49 - 50 287.44 - - - - Govt. Rangeland 237.44 11,872 1.19 D 50 - D 50 - 51 260.00 - - - - Govt. Rangeland 210.00 10,500 1.05 D 51 - D 51 - 52 273.55 - - - - Govt. Rangeland 223.55 11,178 1.12 D 52 - D 52 - 55 270.00 - - - - Govt. Rangeland 220.00 11,000 1.10 D 55 - D 55 - End 60.00 - - - - Govt. Rangeland 10.00 500 0.05 D 01-55 120,000 sub-total (c): 17,309.44 13,157.45 657,873 777,873 77.79 - 1,502 75,100 7.51 A 1-D 55 150,000 TOTAL 20,682 15,964 798,207 948,207 94.82 - 1,518 75,900 7.59 Total Affected Land (Towers+Line): 1,098,207 109.82

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 50

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Appendix 2: List of Participants in Consultation Sessions (LARP - D.G.Khan) No. Name of Participant Status No. Name of Participant Status Men's Groups Women's Groups Group M-1: Samundriwala, Aaliwala (16 May 07) Group W-1: Aaliwala Village (16 May 07) 1 Ghulam Mohd s/o Mawa Khan Landowner-AP 1 Huda Bibi Housewife-AH 2 Fazal Karim s/o Allah Wasaya Landowner-Other 2 Amina Begum Housewife-AH 3 Abdul Aziz s/o Khan Mohd Landowner-AP 3 Khalida Parveen Housewife-AH 4 Fateh Karim s/o Allah Wasaya Landowner-AP 4 Shakira Hafiz School Teacher 5 Abdul Karim s/o Khair Mohd Landowner-AP 5 Umamah Ambrin Housewife-AH 6 Jamal Mohammad s/o Deen M. Landowner-AP -- - 7 Allah Wasaya s/o Gul Mohd Landowner-AP -- - 8 Ghulam Farid s/o Muma Khan Landowner-AP -- - 9 Ghaus Bux s/o Mohd Eisa Landowner-AP -- - 10 Nazir Ahmad s/o Fateh Deen Landowner-AP -- - Group M-2: Kot Chhutta Bazar (19 May 07) -- - 11 Mian Zaman s/o Mian Tufail Landowner-AP -- - 12 Khuda Bux s/o Ahmad Bux Landowner-AP -- - 13 Allah Devia s/o Elahi Bux Landowner-AP -- - 14 Haji M. Sharif s/o Gh. Haider Landowner-AP -- - 15 Saifullah Khan s/o Faiz Mohd Landowner-AP -- - 16 Hammad Khan s/o Hamid Khan School Teacher -- - 17 Rahmat Khosa s/o Khurshid Landowner-AP -- - 18 Ismail Khan s/o Mohd Khan Landowner-AP -- - 19 Ishaq Khan s/o Jamal Khan Landowner-AP -- - 20 Abdul Rahim s/o Gh. Hasan Landowner-AP -- - 21 Mohd Akmal s/o Ahmad Bux Landowner-Other -- - Group M-3: Banglewala, Paigan (21 May 07) Group W-2: Paigan Village (21 May 07) 22 Iqbal Khan s/o Gamar Khan Landowner-AP 6 Sabahat Jabeen School Teacher 23 Altaf Muhasjir s/o Mubarik Ali Landowner-AP 7 Hamida Begum Housewife-AH 24 Jind Wada s/o Jamal Landowner-AP 8 Wajahat Bibi Housewife-AH 25 Ghulam Akbar s/o Gh Rasool Landowner-AP 9 Ishrat Fatima Mid-Wife 26 Ameer Bux s/o Jalal Din Landowner-Other 10 Abida Parveen Housewife-AH 27 Amanullah s/o Ghulam Mohd Landowner-AP 11 Nasima Jan Housewife-AH 28 Ghluam Haider s/o Gh. Rasool Landowner-AP 12 Hurmat Bibi Housewife-AH Group M-4: Paigan Village: 22 May 07 (Tuesday) -- - 29 Wazir s/o Yaar Mohammad Landowner-AP -- - 30 Aoun Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim Landowner-AP -- - 31 Ghulam Ali s/o Haji Hasan Landowner-AP -- - 32 Jan Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim Landowner-AP -- - 33 Nasar Khan s/o Haji Hasan Landowner-AP -- - 34 Amanullah s/o Ramzan Landowner-AP -- - 35 Farooq s/o Hamid Khan Landowner-AP -- - 36 Rahim Bux s/o Haji Hasan Landowner-AP -- - 37 Bilal Akbar s/o Ghulam Qasim Landowner-AP -- - Group M-5: Chit Sarkani, Gadai (23 May 07) Group W-3: Chit Sarkani, Gadai (23 May 07) 38 Manzoor Sarkani s/o Mohd Bux Paigan 13 Naheed Akhtar Housewife-AH 39 Ghulam Shabir s/o Mohd Bux Godhpur 14 Shabnam Ara Housewife-AH 40 Kaurha s/o Hayat Sushani Godhpur 15 Muhktaran Bibi Housewife-AH 41 Ghulam Husain s/o Musa Khan Chit Sarkani 16 Firdaus Begum School Teacher 42 Abdul Karim s/o Musa Khan Chit Sarkani 17 Nasim Akhtar Housewife-AH 43 Kasmia Khan s/o Sangar Khan Chit Sarkani 18 Parveen Akhtar Housewife-AH 44 Jan Mohammad s/o Sher Khan Chit Sarkani 19 Shehla Ayaz College Student 45 Chandi Khan s/o Lal Deen Chit Sarkani 20 Rubina Yasmeen High School Student 46 Mohd Husain s/o Elahi Bux Chit Sarkani 21 Wahdat Nisa Housewife-AH -- -22 Zahida Khatoon Housewife-AH

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 51

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Appendix 3 – Draft Public Information Brochure

Power Transmission Enhancement Program New D. G. Khan 500 kV Sub-Station & Transmission Line

National Transmission and Dispatch Company Government of Pakistan

November 2007

Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts Compensation/Rehabilitation: Information Booklet

A General 1. The National Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC), with assistance from Asian Development Bank (ADB), is intending to implement the Power Transmission Enhancement Program (PTEP) which will upgrade and extend the transmission network to expand the capacity and coverage of the network. The PTEP will be implemented over five to six years, and will include a number of tranches or groups of subprojects. 2. The first tranche included some 21 subprojects including three new Sub-Stations, expansion of existing Sub-Stations, and installation of associated transmission lines; 18 of the subprojects will not cause any resettlement impacts as they entail transformers being installed within an existing Sub-Station site and no works beyond the existing Sub- Station site boundaries. There are three subprojects (including D. G. Khan subproject) that required transmission lines and the installation of the towers for these will require land acquisition, and the stringing of their lines will mean that crops and trees will be damaged. 3. These subprojects include also the D. G. Khan Sub-Station and 500kV Transmission Line Subproject which will provide additional capacity for the area. The substation will be constructed on state owned barren land to be acquired from the government. There will be approximately 21.4km of 500 kV dual circuit transmission lines to connect to the existing 500 kV Guddu Multan 500 kV transmission line. 4. The subproject will be implemented in the area where you live starting later in 2007 and will affect crops and trees in your communities. To compensate and/or rehabilitate these losses the provisions of relevant Pakistan laws and of the ADB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement will be adopted. This has included the preparation of a Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework (LARF) setting out the basic compensation/rehabilitation provisions for the PTEP and a Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) providing data on impacts and affected families and indicating in detail how the impacts will be

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 52

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

compensated or rehabilitated has been prepared for each subproject that requires temporary disturbance to land and subsequent compensation for crops and trees. 5. Both the LARF and the LARP in Urdu language will be available for perusal to anyone interested at the Project Implementation Unit in D. G. Khan district. This booklet summarizing the provisions of the LARF and the LARP for the D. G. Khan Subproject is given to all the families whose land, trees and crops and incomes are affected by this subproject. The objective of this booklet is to inform them of the essential compensation and rehabilitation policy for the D. G. Khan Subproject and of a number of basic issues relative to the implementation of the compensation and rehabilitation program.

B. Principles For Compensation and/or Rehabilitation of Affected Families Principles for the compensation/rehabilitation of affected people (AHs) by the D. G. Khan Sub-Station and Transmission Line subproject are: • Land acquisition will be avoided and acquisition will only occur where access to, or use of, an AP’s land is affected; • Compensation will guarantee the maintenance of the AHs pre-project living standards; • AHs will be fully informed/consulted on compensation options; • AHs’ socio-cultural institutions will be supported and used; • Land acquisition provisions will equally apply to women and men; • Lack of formal title will not impede rehabilitation of families losing land; • Particular attention will be paid to women-headed households and vulnerable groups; • Land acquisition budgets will be included in project costs; and • Compensation will be fully provided prior to ground leveling and demolition.

C. Compensation and Rehabilitation eligibility and entitlements All families residing in affected areas and holding affected assets or incomes before the eligibility cut-off date for the project 24th May 2007 (the date of the end of the impact survey) will be entitled to compensation and/or rehabilitation for their losses. This provision includes legal owners, sharecroppers and leaseholders and squatters as detailed in Table 1.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 53

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table A-1: Eligibility and Entitlements Matrix Asset Specification Affected People Compensation Entitlements No Land compensation provided that land is rehabilitated/restored to former quality following completion Farmer/Titleholder of works. Compensation, in cash, for all damaged crops and trees as per item below No Land compensation provided that the land is Access is not Leaseholder rehabilitated/restored to former quality following completion restricted and existing (registered or not) of works. Compensation, in cash, for all damaged crops and Arable Land or current land use will trees as per item below remain unchanged Sharecroppers Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees (registered or not) as per item below Agricultural workers Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees as per item below Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees Squatters as per item below Land for land compensation with plots of equal value and productivity to the plots lost; or cash for affected land at Farmer/Titleholder replacement cost based on market value a plus 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge and free of taxes, registration, and transfer costs Renewal of lease in plots of equal value/productivity of plots All adverse effects on Leaseholder lost, or Cash equivalent to market value of gross yield of Arable Land land use independent (registered or not) affected land for the remaining lease years (up to a of severity of impact maximum of 3 years). Sharecroppers Cash compensation equal to market value of lost harvest (registered or not) share once (temporary impact) or twice (permanent impact) Agricultural Cash indemnity equal to salary (including portions in kind) workers for remaining part of agricultural year. 1 rehabilitation allowance equal to market value of 1 gross Squatters harvest (additional to crop compensation) for land use loss. 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross Farmer/Titleholder harvest of affected land for 1 year (inclusive of winter and Leaseholder summer crop and additional to standard crop compensation) Additional for severe Sharecroppers 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of harvest Arable Land impacts (registered or not) share (additional to standard crop compensation) (>10% of land loss) 1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross harvest of the affected land for 1 year (inclusive of winter Squatters and summer crop and additional to standard crop compensation) Land x land through provision of plots comparable in value/location to plot lost; or cash for affected land at full Titleholder Residential/ replacement cost free of taxes, registration, transfer costs Commercial plus 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge. Land Renter/Leaseholder 1-3 months allowance Accommodation in a government resettlement area or a Squatters self-relocation allowance All relevant APs Cash compensation at replacement rate for affected Houses and (including structure/other fixed assets free of salvaged materials,

Structures squatters) depreciation or transaction costs. For partial impacts full cash assistance to restore remaining structure. All APs (also Crop compensation in cash at full market rate for one squatters) harvest (either winter or summer) by default for impacts Crops Crops affected caused by tower bases and perimeter, stringing and access. All other crop losses will be compensated at market rates based on actual losses.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 54

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Asset Specification Affected People Compensation Entitlements All APs also Trees Trees affected Cash compensation shall reflect income replacement squatters) All APs (including Business owner: (i) Cash compensation equal to 1 year squatters) income, if loss permanent; (ii) cash compensation for the Business Loss of business or period of business interruption, if loss is temporary. Employment employment Worker/employee: lost wages indemnity for the business interruption period up to a 3 months maximum. Transport, transition All APs so affected Provision of sufficient allowance to cover transport expenses Relocation costs and livelihood expenses for one month. Rehabilitation/substitution of affected structures/utilities (i.e. Community mosques, roads, schools etc. AP below poverty Vulnerable AP Employment priority in project-related jobs. line

D. Compensation Assessment for Affected Crops and Trees The following five tables (Tables A-2 to A-6) provide the bases for assessment of compensations for the affected agricultural crops and fruit and wood trees under this D. G. Khan Subproject.

Table A-2: Average Crop Income in Subproject Area

Table A-3: Categorization and Income Replacement Values of Affected Fruit Trees

Name of Categorization No. of Fruit Potential for Fruiting Income Affected Maturity Age Harvests Period Annual Replacement No. Fruit Tree Level (Years) Per Year (Years) Income (Rs) Value (Rs.) 1 Date Palm Immature up to 10 0 15 1,000 15,000 Mature-1 10 - 20 1 10 1,000 10,000 Mature-2 above 20 1 5 700 3,500 2 Mango Immature up to 08 0 12 1,700 20,400 Mature-1 08 - 16 1 8 1,700 13,600 Mature-2 above 16 1 4 1,200 4,800

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 55

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Table A-4: Relative Sizes of Affected Wood Trees by Size Name of Small Medium Large Wood Tree Height (m) Girth (m) Height (m) Girth (m) Height (m) Girth (m) Shisham >3.8 >0.5 3.9 - 7.6 0.5 - 0.9 >7.7 >1.0 Eucalyptus >4.6 >0.3 4.6 - 9.1 0.4 - 0.5 >9.1 >0.5 Kikar >3.0 >0.5 3.1 - 6.1 0.5 - 0.9 >6.1 >1.0 Mulberry >3.0 >0.5 3.1 - 6.1 0.5 - 0.9 >6.1 >1.0 Sirin/Saras >3.8 >0.5 3.9 - 7.6 0.5 - 0.9 >7.7 >1.0

Table A-6: Number and Compensation of Affected Wood Trees by Size (D. G. Khan) No. Name of Relative Affected Wood Tree (No.) Market Rate Total Price Wood Tree Size Line A Line B Line D Total (Rs.) (Rs.) 1 Shisham Small 8 5 34 47 4,500 211,500 Medium 10 6 72 88 6,000 528,000 Large 7 3 15 25 8,000 200,000 Sub-total (a): Shisham 25 14 121 160 - 939,500 2 Eucalyptus Small 1 4 3 8 3,000 24,000 Medium 3 2 11 16 4,000 64,000 Large 0 2 2 4 6,000 24,000 Sub-total (b): Eucalyptus 4 8 16 28 - 112,000 3 Kikar (Acasia) Small 4 3 14 21 3,000 63,000 Medium 3 7 19 29 5,000 145,000 Large 2 1 4 7 7,000 49,000 Sub-total (c): Kikar (acasia) 9 11 37 57 - 257,000 4 Mulberry Small 2 0 17 19 2,500 47,500 Medium 1 3 32 36 4,000 144,000 Large 3 1 3 7 6,000 42,000 Sub-total (d): Mulberry 6 4 52 62 - 233,500 5 Sirin/Saras Small 6 5 32 43 2,500 107,500 Medium 5 5 43 53 4,500 238,500 Large 3 2 12 17 6,000 102,000 Sub-total (e): Sirin/Saras 14 12 87 113 - 448,000 TOTAL: 44 37 226 420 - 1,990,000

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 56

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

E. Some basic QUESTIONS related to the impacts compensation AND rehabilitation program for the project

Question A - Do we need to have a land title in order to be compensated or rehabilitated? Answer: No. Lack of formal legal rights (title) to land does not prevent AHs from receiving at least rehabilitation assistance. All AHs who were occupying or using the affected land at the time of the cut-off date (see above) will be entitled to compensation or at least rehabilitation under the project. Users of land with title or traditional rights (or who can prove they are legally using the land) who are affected by restricted access to, or use if, the land will be entitled to compensation for land and any assets on the land affected. Users of land who do not have title or traditional rights to land will be provided full compensation for any structures, crops or trees on land affected by the project and if their access to, or use of, the land is affected, will receive rehabilitation for land losses either in form of replacement land (if available) or in form of a cash allowance for land- use loss.

Question B - Does compensation apply to my house or structures? Answer: Yes. Houses and any other structures (small shops, animal sheds, etc) that will be affected by the project shall be compensated at replacement cost so that owners can build another structure of the same size and standard.

Question C - What about my crops and trees? Answer: Your affected crops and trees will also be compensated at current market value. Compensation for crops will be based on the anticipated harvest at market value, while compensation for trees will be based on the type, age and productivity of each tree affected.

Question D – Does the above mean that anybody in your community can claim compensation or rehabilitation? Answer: No. The entitled affected families are only those who where residing in project affected areas and had affected assets at the time the impacts assessment and the affected people census was carried out. The cut-off-date for eligibility for this subproject is 14th January 2007 when the impact survey and the affected people census was completed. Anybody who encroaches into the area after the cut-off-date will not be entitled to compensation or any other form of resettlement assistance.

Question E - Do we need to vacate and clear the affected properties immediately after they have been identified as needed by the project? Answer: No. Clearing the affected areas will only take place AFTER the compensation or rehabilitation for affected land or other lost assets and the appropriate subsidies have

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 57

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

been provided to you. After the day in which compensation and rehabilitation was delivered to you, you will then have 1 month to clear the land. If you have not done so after a month the project will be allowed to enter your ex-property and clear the land for you.

Question F - If there is any disagreement regarding the way the compensation policy set up in the LARP has been implemented or any other issue relative to the compensation and rehabilitation program for the project do we have the right to complain, and if so how and where? Answer: Yes. Any AP may file a complaint or grievance. AHs will first lodge a complaint with the land acquisition collector and the project implementation unit in D. G. Khan district. If unanswered within 15 days, the complaint can then be lodged to NTDC’s project management unit in Lahore. Finally if the grievance is still not settled within 1 month, the AP can seek redress at the appropriate court. The village administrations and the Land Acquisition Coordination Committee (LACC) composed by senior members of the AP communities and by their elected representatives will assist the AP in these cases. The concerned land acquisition coordination committees will properly document all complaints and resolutions. AHs will be exempted from all taxes, administrative and legal fees associated with resolving the dispute.

Question G - Who can we contact for more information about the project? Answer: For further information about the project as a whole, the LARP for the D. G. Khan Subproject, or if you would like to receive a full copy of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework for the project, please contact as follows:

NATIONAL TRANSMISSION AND DISPATCH COMPANY Address: Room No. 140, WAPDA House, Lahore Phone Number: +92-42-9202414 Contact person: M. Tahir Khan (Manager MTP)

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 58

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

Appendix 4 – Terms of Reference for External Monitoring Consultant/NGO

The part time consultant will be responsible for the external evaluation of the implementation of the resettlement plan. S/he has the following general tasks: I. To review and verify the progress in resettlement implementation as outlined in the Resettlement Plan/s specific for the project components. II. To assess resettlement efficiency, effectiveness, impacts and sustainability, drawing both on policies and practices and to suggest any corrective measures, if necessary.

A. Specific Tasks 1. Design an appropriate set of indicators for gathering and analyzing information on resettlement impacts; the indicators shall include the following issues: • Budget and timeframe regarding land acquisition and crop/tree compensations, • Delivery of entitlement packages in a timely and efficient manner, • Satisfaction of affected people on entitlements, compensation, • Satisfaction of AHs with grievance procedures and outcomes, • Socio-economic conditions of the AHs in the post-resettlement period, • Level of satisfaction of AHs in the post resettlement period. 2 Review results of internal monitoring and verify claims through random checking at the field level to assess whether resettlement objectives have been generally met. Involve the AHs and community groups in assessing the impact of resettlement for monitoring and evaluation purposes. 3 Conduct both individual and community level impact analysis through the use of formal and informal surveys, key informant interviews, focus group discussions and community public meeting to assess the impact of resettlement. 4 Identify the strengths and weaknesses of basic resettlement objectives and approaches, implementation strategies, including institutional issues, and provides suggestions for improvements in future resettlement policy making and planning. Directly feedback the results and recommendations to NTDC/PMU, LAC/GSC and ADB.

B. Qualifications A local expert can conduct this independent evaluation. The consultant must have at least 5 years experience in project monitoring work and a MA in Social Science. The consultant should have experience in resettlement management and monitoring work in ADB-financed projects.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 59

Power Transmission Enhancement Program

C. Implementation Schedule and Inputs The expert will be hired for a total period of 30 days for one-time or intermittent input. The expert is expected to conduct one monitoring mission upon completion of the RP implementation and submit a post-completion monitoring and evaluation report to PMU/NTDC and ADB.

D. Reporting Requirements The monitoring expert will review the status of the RP implementation in light of the targets, budget and duration as outlined in the Resettlement Plan for the hydropower project site. The expert will submit reports to the ADB and PMU after each monitoring mission and determine the implementation status and quality of resettlement operations and also assess whether resettlement goals have been achieved. He will suggest suitable recommendations for improvement. The external monitoring expert will prepare a Final Report on the subproject’s LARP monitoring work at the end of the contract period indicating the project performance and lessons learned for future projects of this kind.

LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007 Page 60