DOCSLIB.ORG

Anura:Microhylidae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE PHYLOGENY OF THE PAPUAN SUBFAIÏILY ASTEROPHRYINAE (ANURA: MICROHYLIDAE) by THO¡1IAS CHARLES BURTON, 8.4., B.Sc. (Hons)MeIb. Department of Zoology University of Adelaide A thesis submitted to the UniVersity of Adelaide for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhY JT'NE 1.9 8 3 To ChwLø SUMMARY THE PHYLOGENY OF THE PAPUAN SUBFAMILY ASTEROPHRYINAE (nruunR : MI cRoHyt-rrRE) The Asterophryinae is a subfamily of terrestrial and fossorial microhylid frogs restricted to the Papuan Sub- Region. It comprises 43 named species and subspecies in seven genera. A second microhylid subfamily, the Sphenophryninae, also occurs in the Papuan Sub-Region, and its relationship to the Asterophryinae is contentious- In this study I undertake a phylogenetic analysis of the Asterophryinae based on the results of an examination of the myology, osteology and external morphology of members of all of the genera, and also of members of the Sphenophryninae, other microhylid. subfamilies and the Ranoidea, which serve as out-groups at different levels of analysis. The Asterophryinae and Sphenophryninae form a monophyletic group (sensu Hennig, 19661 supported by two autapomorphies: (a) direct embryonic development within the egg capsule; and (b) fusion and enlargement of the palatine and prevomer. The monophyly of the Asterophryinae is supported by three autapomorphies: (a) posterior adherence of the tongue and its division into anterior and posterior sections; (b) fusion of elements of the mandible and displacement of the mentomeckelians from the anterior margin of the mandible; and (c) loss of a dorsal el-ement J-aa of the M. intermandíbuLaris. The monophyly of the Sphenophryninae is supported by only one character of dubious value: procoely of the vertebral column. The polarities of characters observed to vary among the asterophryines are assessed and a cladogram is constructed on the basis of shared and derived character states. This cladogram is converted to a Proposed classification in the format of the Annotated Linnean Hierarchy of Wiley lL979l. A number of taxonomic actions are shown to be necessary: (1) Resurrection of Mantophryne Boulenger 1897 to accommodate'three species of Phrynomantis with closer affinities to .4 sterophnys, HyLophorbus and' Phetohapsis than to other Phrynomantís species. (21 Transfer of Xenorhina doniae Lo Phrynomantís. (3) Erection of four tribes to accommodate monophyletic groups of genera: Asterophryini (Astenophrys, HALophot'bus, Møntophv,Ane and Phez'ohapsisl ¡ Barygenyini (BarygenA sl ¡ phrynomantini (Phngnomantisli and Xenorhinini lXenobatrachus anð. Xenorhína). (4) Redefinition of all genera in the light of newly described taxonomic characters. A number of morphological characters described for the first time in the course of this study appear to have potential for use in wider phylogenetic studies of the microhylid.s. Though a biogeographical synthesis is considered premature, a number of hypotheses are brought forward to iv explain aspects of the patterns of d.istribution of the Asterophryinae. v l I I 1 I I DECLARATION : l This thesis contains no material accepted I for the award of anY other degree or diploma in this or any other uníversity' To the best of my knowtedge this thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person, except when due reference is made in the text' vi ACKNOVJLEDGEMENTS Many individuals and institutions aided me at various stages during the completion of this project. My thanks are expressed to all of them. l4ike Tyler suggested and supervised this project and provided access to.specimens so that I could get it under way. Mike was an unfailing source of support and encouragement throughout the project. He read. closely and critically the drafts of the manuscript. Margaret Davies helped me greatly with my setting myself up for drawings, and. aided me by instruction and encouragement in that art and in the divers arts of osteology. Philippa Horton ted me back to the long-forgotten realms of histology, and helped me with proof-reading. These three bore much of the brunt of my tatest theories, mY successes (real and imagined) and failures, and for their support in times of triumph and despondency I am very thankful. other post- graduate students in the Department of Zoology, notably Jenny Gardner, Graeme Browning and Alice Wells lent their ears and gave useful advice and ideas when I needed them' Linda Trueb, in a five-minute conversation and. demonstration, showed me how to bring my chicken-scratchings to a publishable standard. Terry Schwaner lent me several books, gave some useful advice, and introduced me to the ideas of Wiley' Rev. Br. John Marks, headmaster of Rostrevor college, gave me time off to complete this project with generous conditions, and some of my colleagues, particularly Mary Meredith and Peter Taylor, bore ad'ded' burdens as a result of vaa my absence. Mary often acted as a sounding-board for my ideas. Department of science and Industry supported my field- trip to Papua New Guinea and the Department of Biology, UPNG, supported my visa application. In PNG I was very fortunate to be acconìmodated, helped in the field and in other ways, and befriended by Dennis and Krista Black, Roy and Margaret Mackay, Rupert Stocks and AII-en Allison' Specimens were provided by the following institutions: American Museum of Natural History (R.G. Zweifel); Australian Museum (H.G. Cogger); Museum of comparative Zoology (J. Rosad.o) ; Rijksmuseum van_Na_tuurlijke Historie, Leiden $6.6fla Avslral,an l4useom (il'Ty/e") ; (M. Hoogmoed) r/ University of- eÑG (r,. HiII, D. B1ack). Keith IvlcDonald provÍded líve specimens from Queensland' Ross McDonald. took radiographs of specimens deemed too precious to dissect. The Australian Museum supported my work with a student grant, and I was supported also by a research grant from the UniversitY of Ad'elaide- This project could not have begun without the pioneering work of Dr. R.G. Zweifel, who placed, the taxonomy of the Asterophryinae on a f irm basis. He \^las prompt and generous in the provision of specimens, transparencies, advice and encouragement. That he went out of his way to aid me in a reworking of his major study is a mark of his humility and scientific honestY. It was my wife, cherie, who suggested that I take time off work to finish this project. cherie bore the diminution viii of our income, mY strange time-table, my bizarre preoccupations, and her increased parental burden with loving tolerance. She was always ready to discuss my work and its meaning and her opinions were valued highly. Jonathan, our son, who regards crePuscularity and an interest in frogs normative for adult males, rarely caused distraction and anxiety sufficient to disrupt my work hours, and he gave me much joy between times. ax TABLE OF CONTENTS Page VOLUIT{E 1 SUMMARY .Irr DECLARATION vi ACKNOWLEDGE}'IENTS vii CHAPTER 1- - INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The Microhylids of the Papuan Zoogeogtaphic Subregion 1 7.2 HistorY 2 1. 3 The lr{yology and osteology of the New Guinea MicrohYlids Ll_ L.4 Aims of this Stud'Y 15 CHAPTER 2 - MATERIALS AND METHODS t7 2.L Materials Available T7 2.2 Materials Examined' 18 2.3 Ivlethods: Morphology 19 2.4 Methods: Field StudY 22 2.5 , Method.s: PhYIogenY 22 2.6 BiogeograPhY 30 2.6.1 Origin of the New Guinea microhylids 30 2.6.2 Biogeography within New Guinea 35 CHAPTER 3 - RESULTS: THE MUSCULATURE OF PHRYNOMANTTS STICTOGASTER 38 3. 1 lvluscles of the Head 3B 3.2 Muscles of the. Trunk 45 3.3 lr{uscles of the Pectoral Girdle and Forelimb 48 3.4 l"luscles of the Pelvic Girdle and Hindlinb 63 x Page CHAPTER 4 - RESULTS: VARIATION IN MUSCLE CHARACTERS 82 4.L AsteroPhrYinae 82 4.1.1 Muscles of the head 84 4.L.2 l"luscles of the trunk 95 4.I.3 Muscles of the pectoral girdle and forelimb 98 4.1.4 Muscles of the petvic gird'le and hindlímb 100 4.2 SphenoPhrYninae 106 4.2.1 Muscles of the head 107 4.2.2 Muscles of the trunk 113 4.2.3 lvluscles of the pectoral girdle and' forelimb l_ 14 4.2.4 Muscles of the pelvic girdle and' hindlimb 116 4.3 Other MicrohYlids 119 4. 3. 1 l4uscles of the head 119 4.3.2 Muscles of the trunk L23 4.3.3 Muscles of the pectoral girdle and forelimb t24 4.3.4 Muscles of the pelvic girdle and híndlimb L25 VOLUME 2 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS: THE OSTEOLOGY OF PHRYNOMANTTS ST TCTOGASTER L2B 5.1 Cranium L2B 5.2 The Mandible 1,32 5.3 Hyoid and LarYnx 133 5.4 Pectoral Girdle 133 xl_ Page 5.5 Forelimb and Manus l_34 5.6 Vertebral Column 135 5.7 Pelvic Girdle 1_36 5.8 Hindlimb and, Pes 137 CHAPTER 6 - RESULTS: VARIATION IN SKELETAT, CHARÀCTERS 138 6.1, AsteroPhrYinae 138 6.1.1 Cranium 138 6.1.2 Mandible 145 6.1.3 Hyoid and larYnx I46 6.L.4 Pectoral girdle L46 6.1.5 Forelimb and manus r46 6.1.6 Vertebral column r47 6.1.7 Pelvic girdle L47 6. 1.8 Hind.limb and Pes 148 6.2 Sphenophryninae ]-49 6.2.1 Cranium r49 6.2.2 Mandible 153 6.2.3 Hyoid and. IarYnx t_5 3 6.2.4 Pectoral girdle 153 6.2.5 Forelimb and manus r_54 6.2.6 Vertebral column L54 6.2.7 Pelvic girdle 155 6.2.8 Hindlimb and Pes 155 6.3 Other Microhylids 155 6.3.1 Cranium 156 6.3.2 Mandible r_59 6.3.3 Hyoid and larYnx 159 6.3.4 Pectoral girdle 159 6. 3.5 Forelimb and manus 160 6.3.6 Vertebral column 160 6.3.7 Pelvic girdle 161 6.3.8 Hindlimb and, pes 161 CHAPTER 7 - RESULTS: SUPERFICIAI MORPHOLOGY L62 xLr Page CHAPTER 8 .
Recommended publications
  • Fauna of Australia 2A

    Fauna of Australia 2A

    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 9. FAMILY MICROHYLIDAE Thomas C. Burton 1 9. FAMILY MICROHYLIDAE Pl 1.3. Cophixalus ornatus (Microhylidae): usually found in leaf litter, this tiny frog is endemic to the wet tropics of northern Queensland. [H. Cogger] 2 9. FAMILY MICROHYLIDAE DEFINITION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Microhylidae is a family of firmisternal frogs, which have broad sacral diapophyses, one or more transverse folds on the surface of the roof of the mouth, and a unique slip to the abdominal musculature, the m. rectus abdominis pars anteroflecta (Burton 1980). All but one of the Australian microhylids are small (snout to vent length less than 35 mm), and all have procoelous vertebrae, are toothless and smooth-bodied, with transverse grooves on the tips of their variously expanded digits. The terminal phalanges of fingers and toes of all Australian microhylids are T-shaped or Y-shaped (Pl. 1.3) with transverse grooves. The Microhylidae consists of eight subfamilies, of which two, the Asterophryinae and Genyophryninae, occur in the Australopapuan region. Only the Genyophryninae occurs in Australia, represented by Cophixalus (11 species) and Sphenophryne (five species). Two newly discovered species of Cophixalus await description (Tyler 1989a). As both genera are also represented in New Guinea, information available from New Guinean species is included in this chapter to remedy deficiencies in knowledge of the Australian fauna. HISTORY OF DISCOVERY The Australian microhylids generally are small, cryptic and tropical, and so it was not until 100 years after European settlement that the first species, Cophixalus ornatus, was collected, in 1888 (Fry 1912). As the microhylids are much more prominent and diverse in New Guinea than in Australia, Australian specimens have been referred to New Guinean species from the time of the early descriptions by Fry (1915), whilst revisions by Parker (1934) and Loveridge (1935) minimised the extent of endemism in Australia.
  • The Impact of Anchored Phylogenomics and Taxon Sampling on Phylogenetic Inference in Narrow-Mouthed Frogs (Anura, Microhylidae)

    The Impact of Anchored Phylogenomics and Taxon Sampling on Phylogenetic Inference in Narrow-Mouthed Frogs (Anura, Microhylidae)

    Cladistics Cladistics (2015) 1–28 10.1111/cla.12118 The impact of anchored phylogenomics and taxon sampling on phylogenetic inference in narrow-mouthed frogs (Anura, Microhylidae) Pedro L.V. Pelosoa,b,*, Darrel R. Frosta, Stephen J. Richardsc, Miguel T. Rodriguesd, Stephen Donnellane, Masafumi Matsuif, Cristopher J. Raxworthya, S.D. Bijug, Emily Moriarty Lemmonh, Alan R. Lemmoni and Ward C. Wheelerj aDivision of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA; bRichard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA; cHerpetology Department, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; dDepartamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociencias,^ Universidade de Sao~ Paulo, Rua do Matao,~ Trav. 14, n 321, Cidade Universitaria, Caixa Postal 11461, CEP 05422-970, Sao~ Paulo, Sao~ Paulo, Brazil; eCentre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; fGraduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; gSystematics Lab, Department of Environmental Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India; hDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA; iDepartment of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, Dirac Science Library, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4120, USA; jDivision of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA Accepted 4 February 2015 Abstract Despite considerable progress in unravelling the phylogenetic relationships of microhylid frogs, relationships among subfami- lies remain largely unstable and many genera are not demonstrably monophyletic.
  • View Preprint

    View Preprint

    A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 30 March 2017. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/3077), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. Oliver PM, Iannella A, Richards SJ, Lee MSY. 2017. Mountain colonisation, miniaturisation and ecological evolution in a radiation of direct-developing New Guinea Frogs (Choerophryne, Microhylidae) PeerJ 5:e3077 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3077 Mountain colonisation, miniaturisation and ecological evolution in a radiation of direct developing New Guinea Frogs (Choerophryne, Microhylidae) Paul M Oliver Corresp., 1 , Amy Iannella 2 , Stephen J Richards 3 , Michael S.Y Lee 3, 4 1 Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology & Centre for Biodiversity Analysis, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia 2 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia 3 South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia 4 School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Corresponding Author: Paul M Oliver Email address: [email protected] Aims. Mountain ranges in the tropics are characterised by high levels of localised endemism, often-aberrant evolutionary trajectories, and some of the world’s most diverse regional biotas. Here we investigate the evolution of montane endemism, ecology and body size in a clade of direct-developing frogs (Choerophryne, Microhylidae) from New Guinea. Methods. Phylogenetic relationships were estimated from a mitochondrial molecular dataset using Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches. Ancestral state reconstruction was used to infer the evolution of elevational distribution, ecology (indexed by male calling height), and body size, and phylogenetically corrected regression was employed to examine the relationships between these three traits.
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments

    About the Book the Format Acknowledgments

    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
  • 3Systematics and Diversity of Extant Amphibians

    3Systematics and Diversity of Extant Amphibians

    Systematics and Diversity of 3 Extant Amphibians he three extant lissamphibian lineages (hereafter amples of classic systematics papers. We present widely referred to by the more common term amphibians) used common names of groups in addition to scientifi c Tare descendants of a common ancestor that lived names, noting also that herpetologists colloquially refer during (or soon after) the Late Carboniferous. Since the to most clades by their scientifi c name (e.g., ranids, am- three lineages diverged, each has evolved unique fea- bystomatids, typhlonectids). tures that defi ne the group; however, salamanders, frogs, A total of 7,303 species of amphibians are recognized and caecelians also share many traits that are evidence and new species—primarily tropical frogs and salaman- of their common ancestry. Two of the most defi nitive of ders—continue to be described. Frogs are far more di- these traits are: verse than salamanders and caecelians combined; more than 6,400 (~88%) of extant amphibian species are frogs, 1. Nearly all amphibians have complex life histories. almost 25% of which have been described in the past Most species undergo metamorphosis from an 15 years. Salamanders comprise more than 660 species, aquatic larva to a terrestrial adult, and even spe- and there are 200 species of caecilians. Amphibian diver- cies that lay terrestrial eggs require moist nest sity is not evenly distributed within families. For example, sites to prevent desiccation. Thus, regardless of more than 65% of extant salamanders are in the family the habitat of the adult, all species of amphibians Plethodontidae, and more than 50% of all frogs are in just are fundamentally tied to water.
  • Global Diversity of Amphibians (Amphibia) in Freshwater

    Global Diversity of Amphibians (Amphibia) in Freshwater

    Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:569–580 DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-9032-2 FRESHWATER ANIMAL DIVERSITY ASSESSMENT Global diversity of amphibians (Amphibia) in freshwater Miguel Vences Æ Jo¨rn Ko¨hler Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract This article present a review of species amphibians is very high, with only six out of 348 numbers, biogeographic patterns and evolutionary aquatic genera occurring in more than one of the major trends of amphibians in freshwater. Although most biogeographic divisions used herein. Global declines amphibians live in freshwater in at least their larval threatening amphibians are known to be triggered by phase, many species have evolved different degrees of an emerging infectious fungal disease and possibly by independence from water including direct terrestrial climate change, emphasizing the need of concerted development and viviparity. Of a total of 5,828 conservation efforts, and of more research, focused on amphibian species considered here, 4,117 are aquatic both their terrestrial and aquatic stages. in that they live in the water during at least one life- history stage, and a further 177 species are water- Keywords Amphibia Á Anura Á Urodela Á dependent. These numbers are tentative and provide a Gymnophiona Á Species diversity Á Evolutionary conservative estimate, because (1) the biology of many trends Á Aquatic species Á Biogeography Á Threats species is unknown, (2) more direct-developing spe- cies e.g. in the Brachycephalidae, probably depend directly on moisture near water bodies and (3) the Introduction accelerating rate of species discoveries and descrip- tions in amphibians indicates the existence of many Amphibians are a textbook example of organisms more, yet undescribed species, most of which are living at the interface between terrestrial and aquatic likely to have aquatic larvae.
  • La Collezione Erpetologica Del Museo Civico Di Storia Naturale “G. Doria” Di Genova the Herpetological Collection of the Museo Civico Di Storia Naturale “G

    La Collezione Erpetologica Del Museo Civico Di Storia Naturale “G. Doria” Di Genova the Herpetological Collection of the Museo Civico Di Storia Naturale “G

    MUSEOLOGIA SCIENTIFICA MEMORIE • N. 5/2010 • 62-68 Le collezioni erpetologiche dei Musei italiani The herpetological collections of italian museums Stefano Mazzotti (ed.) La collezione erpetologica del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale “G. Doria” di Genova The herpetological collection of the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale “G. Doria” of Genoa Giuliano Doria Museo Civico di Storia Naturale “G. Doria”, Via Brigata Liguria 9. I-16121 Genova. E-mail: [email protected] RIASSUNTO Il primo nucleo della collezione erpetologica del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale “Giacomo Doria” di Genova è costituito dalle raccolte effettuate da Giacomo Doria, fondatore del Museo, nella zona di La Spezia, in Persia (oggi Iran) e in Borneo (insieme a Odoardo Beccari) negli anni 1862-1868. Successivamente la collezione viene incrementata col materiale di numerose spedizioni condotte in tutti i conti - nenti; i risultati di tali raccolte sono stati spesso pubblicati sugli “Annali” del Museo. Nella collezione sono pre - senti 593 specie di Anfibi e 1.456 di Rettili; 171 taxa, attualmente validi, sono rappresentati da tipi. Parole chiave: Anfibi, Rettili, Museo di Genova, annali, tipi. ABSTRACT The first nucleus of the herpetological collection of the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale “Giacomo Doria” (Italy, Genoa) was made up of the specimens collected in the years 1862-1868 near La Spezia (Italy, Liguria), in Persia (now Iran) and in Borneo (with Odoardo Beccari) by its founder, Giacomo Doria. Later, it was increased with thousands of specimens collected during several expeditions throughout all the continents. Many important studies about this rich material have been published in “Annali”, the museum’s journal.
  • Final Frontier: Newly Discovered Species of New Guinea

    Final Frontier: Newly Discovered Species of New Guinea

    REPORT 2011 Conservation Climate Change Sustainability Final Frontier: Newly discovered species of New Guinea (1998 - 2008) WWF Western Melanesia Programme Office Author: Christian Thompson (the green room) www.greenroomenvironmental.com, with contributions from Neil Stronach, Eric Verheij, Ted Mamu (WWF Western Melanesia), Susanne Schmitt and Mark Wright (WWF-UK), Design: Torva Thompson (the green room) Front cover photo: Varanus macraei © Lutz Obelgonner. This page: The low water in a river exposes the dry basin, at the end of the dry season in East Sepik province, Papua New Guinea. © Text 2011 WWF WWF is one of the world’s largest and most experienced independent conservation organisations, with over 5 million supporters and a global Network active in more than 100 countries. WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by conserving the world’s biological diversity, ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable, and promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. © Brent Stirton / Getty images / WWF-UK © Brent Stirton / Getty Images / WWF-UK Closed-canopy rainforest in New Guinea. New Guinea is home to one of the world’s last unspoilt rainforests. This report FOREWORD: shows, it’s a place where remarkable new species are still being discovered today. As well as wildlife, New Guinea’s forests support the livelihoods of several hundred A VITAL YEAR indigenous cultures, and are vital to the country’s development. But they’re under FOR FORESTS threat. This year has been designated the International Year of Forests, and WWF is redoubling its efforts to protect forests for generations to come – in New Guinea, and all over the world.
  • Eleutherodactylus Ridens (Pygmy Rainfrog) Predation Tobias Eisenberg

    Eleutherodactylus Ridens (Pygmy Rainfrog) Predation Tobias Eisenberg

    Sacred Heart University DigitalCommons@SHU Biology Faculty Publications Biology 9-2007 Eleutherodactylus ridens (Pygmy Rainfrog) Predation Tobias Eisenberg Twan Leenders Sacred Heart University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/bio_fac Part of the Population Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Eisenberg, T. & Leenders, T. (2007). Eleutherodactylus ridens (Pygmy Rainfrog) predation. Herpetological Review, 38(3), 323. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at DigitalCommons@SHU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SHU. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. SSAR Officers (2007) HERPETOLOGICAL REVIEW President The Quarterly News-Journal of the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles ROY MCDIARMID USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Editor Managing Editor National Museum of Natural History ROBERT W. HANSEN THOMAS F. TYNING Washington, DC 20560, USA 16333 Deer Path Lane Berkshire Community College Clovis, California 93619-9735, USA 1350 West Street President-elect [email protected] Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201, USA BRIAN CROTHER [email protected] Department of Biological Sciences Southeastern Louisiana University Associate Editors Hammond, Louisiana 70402, USA ROBERT E. ESPINOZA CHRISTOPHER A. PHILLIPS DEANNA H. OLSON California State University, Northridge Illinois Natural History Survey USDA Forestry Science Lab Secretary MARION R. PREEST ROBERT N. REED MICHAEL S. GRACE R. BRENT THOMAS Joint Science Department USGS Fort Collins Science Center Florida Institute of Technology Emporia State University The Claremont Colleges Claremont, California 91711, USA EMILY N. TAYLOR GUNTHER KÖHLER MEREDITH J. MAHONEY California Polytechnic State University Forschungsinstitut und Illinois State Museum Naturmuseum Senckenberg Treasurer KIRSTEN E.
  • 1704632114.Full.Pdf

    1704632114.Full.Pdf

    Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous PNAS PLUS diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary Yan-Jie Fenga, David C. Blackburnb, Dan Lianga, David M. Hillisc, David B. Waked,1, David C. Cannatellac,1, and Peng Zhanga,1 aState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, College of Ecology and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China; bDepartment of Natural History, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; cDepartment of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Collections, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712; and dMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Contributed by David B. Wake, June 2, 2017 (sent for review March 22, 2017; reviewed by S. Blair Hedges and Jonathan B. Losos) Frogs (Anura) are one of the most diverse groups of vertebrates The poor resolution for many nodes in anuran phylogeny is and comprise nearly 90% of living amphibian species. Their world- likely a result of the small number of molecular markers tra- wide distribution and diverse biology make them well-suited for ditionally used for these analyses. Previous large-scale studies assessing fundamental questions in evolution, ecology, and conser- used 6 genes (∼4,700 nt) (4), 5 genes (∼3,800 nt) (5), 12 genes vation. However, despite their scientific importance, the evolutionary (6) with ∼12,000 nt of GenBank data (but with ∼80% missing history and tempo of frog diversification remain poorly understood. data), and whole mitochondrial genomes (∼11,000 nt) (7). In By using a molecular dataset of unprecedented size, including 88-kb the larger datasets (e.g., ref.
  • Systematics of the Carlia “Fusca” Lizards (Squamata: Scincidae) of New Guinea and Nearby Islands

    Systematics of the Carlia “Fusca” Lizards (Squamata: Scincidae) of New Guinea and Nearby Islands

    Systematics of the Carlia “fusca” Lizards (Squamata: Scincidae) of New Guinea and Nearby Islands George R. Zug Bishop Museum Bulletin in Zoology 5 Bishop Museum Press Honolulu, 2004 Cover: Published by Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA Copyright ©2004 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 0893-312X Zug — Carlia “fusca” Lizards from New Guinea and Nearby Islands v TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................... vii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ viii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Carlia: An Analysis for Species Relationships ........................................................................... 1 Characters and Taxa .................................................................................................................. 2 Phylogenetic Analysis................................................................................................................ 8 New Guinea Carlia “fusca” ....................................................................................................... 9 Materials and Methods.................................................................................................................
  • (Amphibia: Anura) on New Guinea: a Mitochondrial Phylogeny Reveals Parallel Evolution of Morph

    (Amphibia: Anura) on New Guinea: a Mitochondrial Phylogeny Reveals Parallel Evolution of Morph

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47 (2008) 353–365 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev The radiation of microhylid frogs (Amphibia: Anura) on New Guinea: A mitochondrial phylogeny reveals parallel evolution of morphological and life history traits and disproves the current morphology-based classification Frank Ko¨hler *, Rainer Gu¨nther Museum fu¨r Naturkunde, Humboldt-Universita¨t, Invalidenstr. 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany Received 17 August 2007; revised 24 October 2007; accepted 22 November 2007 Available online 14 January 2008 Abstract Microhylidae account for the majority of frog species on New Guinea and have evolved an extraordinarily wide range of ecological, behavioural, and morphological traits. Several species are known for their unique paternal care behaviour, which includes guarding of clutches in some and additional froglet transport in other species. We sampled 48 out of 215 New Guinean microhylid species and all but two (Mantophryne and Pherohapsis) of 18 New Guinean genera and analysed a concatenated data set of partial sequences of the mito- chondrial genes 12S and 16S, which comprises 1220 aligned nucleotide positions, in order to infer the phylogenetic relationships within this diverse group of frogs. The trees do provide resolution at shallow, but not at deep branches. Monophyly is rejected for the genera Callulops, Liophryne, Austrochaperina, Copiula, and Cophixalus as currently recognized. Six clades are well supported: (1) Hylophorbus and Callulops cf. robustus, (2) its sister taxon comprising Xenorhina, Asterophrys turpicola, and Callulops except for C. cf. robustus, (3) Liophryne rhododactyla, L. dentata, Oxydactyla crassa, and Sphenophryne cornuta, (4) Copiula and Austrochaperina, (5) Barygenys exsul, Cophixalus spp., and Oreophryne, (6) Cophixalus sphagnicola, Albericus laurini, and Choerophryne.