DOCSLIB.ORG

Status, Trends and Future Dynamics of Biodiversity and Ecosystems Underpinning Nature’S Contributions to People 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Status, Trends and Future Dynamics of Biodiversity and Ecosystems Underpinning Nature’S Contributions to People 1 CHAPTER 3 . STATUS, TRENDS AND FUTURE DYNAMICS OF BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEMS UNDERPINNING NATURE’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO PEOPLE 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 STATUS, TRENDS AND CHAPTER FUTURE DYNAMICS OF BIODIVERSITY AND 3 ECOSYSTEMS UNDERPINNING NATURE’S CONTRIBUTIONS CHAPTER TO PEOPLE 4 Coordinating Lead Authors Review Editors: Marie-Christine Cormier-Salem (France), Jonas Ngouhouo-Poufoun (Cameroon) Amy E. Dunham (United States of America), Christopher Gordon (Ghana) This chapter should be cited as: CHAPTER Cormier-Salem, M-C., Dunham, A. E., Lead Authors Gordon, C., Belhabib, D., Bennas, N., Dyhia Belhabib (Canada), Nard Bennas Duminil, J., Egoh, B. N., Mohamed- (Morocco), Jérôme Duminil (France), Elahamer, A. E., Moise, B. F. E., Gillson, L., 5 Benis N. Egoh (Cameroon), Aisha Elfaki Haddane, B., Mensah, A., Mourad, A., Mohamed Elahamer (Sudan), Bakwo Fils Randrianasolo, H., Razafindratsima, O. H., 3Eric Moise (Cameroon), Lindsey Gillson Taleb, M. S., Shemdoe, R., Dowo, G., (United Kingdom), Brahim Haddane Amekugbe, M., Burgess, N., Foden, W., (Morocco), Adelina Mensah (Ghana), Ahmim Niskanen, L., Mentzel, C., Njabo, K. Y., CHAPTER Mourad (Algeria), Harison Randrianasolo Maoela, M. A., Marchant, R., Walters, M., (Madagascar), Onja H. Razafindratsima and Yao, A. C. Chapter 3: Status, trends (Madagascar), Mohammed Sghir Taleb and future dynamics of biodiversity (Morocco), Riziki Shemdoe (Tanzania) and ecosystems underpinning nature’s 6 contributions to people. In IPBES (2018): Fellow: The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Gregory Dowo (Zimbabwe) Africa. Archer, E., Dziba, L., Mulongoy, K. J., Maoela, M. A., and Walters, M. (eds.). CHAPTER Contributing Authors: Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Millicent Amekugbe (Ghana), Neil Burgess Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity (United Kingdom), Wendy Foden (South and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany, Africa), Leo Niskanen (Finland), Christine pp. 131–206. Mentzel (South Africa), Kevin Y Njabo (Cameroon), Anicia Malebajoa Maoela (Lesotho), Robert Marchant (United Kingdom), Michele Walters (South Africa), Adou Constant Yao (Cote-d’Ivoire) 131 THE REGIONAL ASSESSMENT REPORT ON BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FOR AFRICA TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 134 3 .1 INTRODUCTION . .135 3 .2 METHODS AND INFORMATION SOURCES . 136 3 .3 OVERVIEW OF STATUS AND TRENDS OF BIODIVERSITY IN THE AFRICAN REGION . 137 3 .3 .1 Status of species diversity ..........................................137 3 .3 .1 .1 Threat status ..............................................139 3 .3 .2 Status of ecosystem components ....................................141 3 .3 .2 .1 Protected area status .......................................142 3 .3 .3 Broad temporal trends in biodiversity and ecosystem components. .143 3 .3 .3 .1 Protected area trends .......................................144 3 .3 .3 .2 Environmental health trends ..................................144 3 .3 .3 .3 Urbanisation, agriculture and biodiversity in Africa ..................145 3 .4 SUBREGIONAL ANALYSIS . 146 3 .4 .1 North Africa .....................................................146 3 .4 .1 .1 Terrestrial .................................................146 3.4.1.1.1 Mediterranean Forest ................................146 3.4.1.1.2 High mountain habitats ...............................148 3.4.1.1.3 Savannah and grassland .............................149 3.4.1.1.4 Dryland and desert ..................................150 3.4.1.1.5 Cultivated lands ....................................152 3 .4 .1 .2 Aquatic (Freshwater, Marine and Coastal) ........................152 3.4.1.2.1 Wetlands .........................................152 3.4.1.2.2 Inland surface waters and water bodies/freshwater .........153 3.4.1.2.3 Shelf ecosystem ....................................153 3.4.1.2.4 Open Ocean .......................................154 3.4.1.2.5 Deep sea .........................................154 3 .4 .2 Central Africa ....................................................155 3 .4 .2 .1 Terrestrial .................................................155 3.4.2.1.1 Tropical and subtropical dry and humid forest ..............155 3.4.2.1.2 High mountain habitats ...............................155 3.4.2.1.3 Savannah and grassland .............................157 3.4.2.1.4 Dryland and desert ..................................157 3.4.2.1.5 Urban/Semi-urban ..................................157 3.4.2.1.6 Cultivated lands ....................................157 3 .4 .2 .2 Aquatic (Freshwater, Marine and Coastal) ........................158 3.4.2.2.1 Wetlands .........................................158 3.4.2.2.2 Inland surface waters and water bodies/freshwater .........158 3.4.2.2.3 Shelf ecosystem ....................................159 3.4.2.2.4 Open Ocean .......................................159 3.4.2.2.5 Deep-sea .........................................160 3 .4 .3 East Africa and adjacent islands ......................................160 3 .4 .3 .1 Terrestrial .................................................160 3.4.3.1.1 Tropical and subtropical dry and humid forest ..............160 3.4.3.1.2 High mountain habitats ...............................161 3.4.3.1.3 Tropical and subtropical savannah and grasslands ..........163 3.4.3.1.4 Dryland and desert ..................................164 3.4.3.1.5 Cultivated lands ....................................164 132 3 .4 .3 .2 Aquatic (Freshwater, Marine and Coastal) ........................166 3.4.3.2.1 Wetlands and mangroves .............................166 3.4.3.2.2 Inland surface waters and water bodies/freshwater .........166 3.4.3.2.3 Shelf ecosystem ....................................167 3.4.3.2.4 Open Ocean .......................................167 3.4.3.2.5 Deep sea .........................................167 3 .4 .4 West Africa ......................................................168 3 .4 .4 .1 Terrestrial .................................................168 3.4.4.1.1 Tropical and subtropical dry and humid forest ..............168 3.4.4.1.2 High mountain habitats ...............................169 3.4.4.1.3 Savannah and grassland .............................171 3.4.4.1.4 Dryland and desert .................................171 3.4.4.1.5 Cultivated lands ....................................171 3 .4 .4 .2 Aquatic (Freshwater, Marine and Coastal) ........................174 3.4.4.2.1 Wetlands .........................................174 3.4.4.2.2 Inland surface waters and water bodies/freshwater .........174 3.4.4.2.3 Shelf-ecosystem ....................................174 3.4.4.2.4 Open Ocean .......................................175 3.4.4.2.5 Deep sea .........................................176 3 .4 .5 Southern Africa ..................................................176 3 .4 .5 .1 Terrestrial .................................................176 3.4.5.1.1 Tropical and subtropical dry and humid forest ..............176 3.4.5.1.2 High mountain habitats and Grassland ...................178 3.4.5.1.3 Savannah and grassland .............................179 3.4.5.1.4 Dryland and desert ..................................179 3.4.5.1.5 Urban/Semi-urban ..................................180 3.4.5.1.6 Cultivated lands ....................................180 3 .4 .5 .2 Aquatic (Freshwater, Coastal and Marine) ........................180 3.4.5.2.1 Freshwater ........................................180 3.4.5.2.2 Shelf-ecosystem ....................................182 3.4.5.2.3 Open Ocean .......................................183 3.4.5.2.4 Deep sea .........................................183 3 .5 IMPACT OF BIODIVERSITY CHANGES ON NATURE’S CONTRIBUTION TO PEOPLE . .184 3 .6 DATA GAPS . .185 3 .7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . 186 REFERENCES ...........................................................187 THE REGIONAL ASSESSMENT REPORT ON BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FOR AFRICA CHAPTER 3 STATUS, TRENDS AND FUTURE DYNAMICS OF BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEMS UNDERPINNING NATURE’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO PEOPLE access to forest products such as medicinal plants and wild EXECUTIVE SUMMARY fruits {3.4.1.1, 3.4.2.1, 3.4.3.1, 3.4.4.1, 3.4.5.1}. Africa has rich and varied biological resources Freshwater biodiversity in Africa is currently under forming the continent’s natural wealth on which severe threat with an estimated 10% decline expected its social and economic systems are based (well by 2050 (established but incomplete). The inland waters established). Africa is home to almost one-quarter of the of Africa support a high diversity of aquatic life. Highest world’s mammal species with their 1,160 species, including levels of biodiversity are found in the Rift Valley Great 194 species of primate and 91 species of antelope. It also Lakes (Lake Malawi, Lake Tanganyika, and Lake Victoria) has more than 2,500 species of birds–one-fourth of the and in the rivers of the Congo. Among 4,989 freshwater world’s total–and at least 5,445 species of fish, as well species assessed (fish, crabs, mollusc, dragonflies, as 2,121 reptile species. The African mainland harbours aquatic plants), 21% are threatened within Africa and 91% between 52,000 and 73,000 plant species and about endemic. The majority of threatened species are found 150,000 known species of insects are known for sub- in areas with high levels of development and demand on Saharan Africa. Nine of the world’s 35 biodiversity hotspots water resources, mainly along the Mediterranean and are in Africa {3.3.1, 3.4.1, 3.4.2, 3.4.3,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download?Doi=10.1.1.446.8608Andrep=Rep1andtype=Pdf Du Sol Du Burkina Faso
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 22 April 2021 doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.632624 Assessment of Livestock Water Productivity in Seno and Yatenga Provinces of Burkina Faso Tunde Adegoke Amole 1*, Adetayo Adekeye 1 and Augustine Abioye Ayantunde 2 1 International Livestock Research Institute, Ibadan, Nigeria, 2 International Livestock Research Institute, Dakar, Senegal The expected increase in livestock production to meet its increasing demand could lead to increased water depletion through feeds production. This study aimed at estimating the amount of water depletion through feeds and its corresponding productivity in livestock within the three dominant livestock management systems namely sedentary-intensive, sedentary-extensive, and transhumance in Yatenga and Seno provinces in the Sahelian zone of Burkina Faso. Using a participatory rapid appraisal and individual interview, beneficial animal products, and services were estimated, and consequently, livestock water productivity (LWP) as the ratio of livestock products and services to the amount of water depleted. Our results showed feed resources are mainly natural pasture and crop residues are common in all the management Edited by: Yaosheng Wang, systems though the proportion of each feed type in the feed basket and seasonal Chinese Academy of Agricultural preferences varied. Consequently, water depleted for feed production was similar across Sciences, China the systems in both provinces and ranged from 2,500 to 3,200 m−3 ha−1 yr−1. Values Reviewed by: Katrien Descheemaeker, for milk (40 US$US$/household) and flock offtake (313 US$/household) derived from Wageningen University and the transhumant system were higher (P < 0.05) than those from other systems in the Research, Netherlands Seno province.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecology of Afromontane Rainforests with Wild Coffea Arabica L
    Feyera Senbeta Wakjira (Autor) Biodiversity and ecology of Afromontane rainforests with wild Coffea arabica L. populations in Ethiopia https://cuvillier.de/de/shop/publications/2260 Copyright: Cuvillier Verlag, Inhaberin Annette Jentzsch-Cuvillier, Nonnenstieg 8, 37075 Göttingen, Germany Telefon: +49 (0)551 54724-0, E-Mail: [email protected], Website: https://cuvillier.de General introduction 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The term biodiversity is used to convey the total number, variety and variability of living organisms and the ecological complexes in which they occur (Wilson 1988; CBD 1992; Rosenzweig 1995). The concept of biological diversity can be applied to a wide range of spatial and organization scales, including genetics, species, community, and landscape scales (Noss 1990; Austin et al. 1996; Tuomisto et al. 2003). It is becoming increasingly apparent that knowledge of the role of patterns and processes that determine diversity at different scales is at the very heart of an understanding of variation in biodiversity. Processes influencing diversity operate at different spatial and temporal scales (Rosenzweig 1995; Gaston 2000). A variety of environmental events and processes, including past evolutionary development, biogeographic processes, extinctions, and current influences govern the biodiversity of a particular site (Brown and Lomolino 1998; Gaston 2000; Ricklefs and Miller 2000). Biodiversity is valued and has been studied largely because it is used, and could be used better, to sustain and improve human well-being (WWF 1993; WCMC 1994). However, there has been a rapid decline in the biodiversity of the world during the past two to three decades (Wilson 1988; Whitmore and Sayer 1992; Lugo et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Tulbagh Renosterveld Project Report
    BP TULBAGH RENOSTERVELD PROJECT Introduction The Cape Floristic Region (CFR) is the smallest and richest floral kingdom of the world. In an area of approximately 90 000km² there are over 9 000 plant species found (Goldblatt & Manning 2000). The CFR is recognized as one of the 33 global biodiversity hotspots (Myers, 1990) and has recently received World Heritage Status. In 2002 the Cape Action Plan for the Environment (CAPE) programme identified the lowlands of the CFR as 100% irreplaceable, meaning that to achieve conservation targets all lowland fragments would have to be conserved and no further loss of habitat should be allowed. Renosterveld , an asteraceous shrubland that predominantly occurs in the lowland areas of the CFR, is the most threatened vegetation type in South Africa . Only five percent of this highly fragmented vegetation type still remains (Von Hase et al 2003). Most of these Renosterveld fragments occur on privately owned land making it the least represented vegetation type in the South African Protected Areas network. More importantly, because of the fragmented nature of Renosterveld it has a high proportion of plants that are threatened with extinction. The Custodians of Rare and Endangered Wildflowers (CREW) project, which works with civil society groups in the CFR to update information on threatened plants, has identified the Tulbagh valley as a high priority for conservation action. This is due to the relatively large amount of Renosterveld that remains in the valley and the high amount of plant endemism. The CAPE program has also identified areas in need of fine scale plans and the Tulbagh area falls within one of these: The Upper Breede River planning domain.
    [Show full text]
  • BEARDED VULTURE POPULATION and HABITAT VIABILITY ASSESSMENT (Gypaetus Barbatus Meridionalis)
    BEARDED VULTURE POPULATION AND HABITAT VIABILITY ASSESSMENT (Gypaetus barbatus meridionalis) Sterkfontein Dam, Harrismith, Free State Province, South Africa 6 - 10 March 2006 BEARDED VULTURE (Gypaetus barbatus meridionalis) POPULATION AND HABITAT VIABILITY ASSESSMENT IN SOUTHERN AFRICA 6 - 10 March 2006 WORKSHOP REPORT Convened by: CONSERVATION BREEDING SPECIALIST GROUP SOUTHERN AFRICA ENDANGERED WILDLIFE TRUST EZEMVELO KWAZULU-NATAL WILDLIFE Sponsored by: Maloti Drakensberg Transfrontier Project In collaboration with THE CONSERVATION BREEDING SPECIALIST GROUP (CBSG) OF THE IUCN SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION Population and Habitat Viability Assessment: Bearded Vulture (Gypaetus barbatus meridionalis) 1 © Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (CBSG-SSC / IUCN) and the Endangered Wildlife Trust. The copyright of the report serves to protect the Conservation Breeding Specialist Group workshop process from any unauthorised use. Krüger, S., Piper, S., Rushworth, I., Botha, A., Daly, B., Allan, D., Jenkins, A., Burden, D. and Friedmann, Y. (editors). 2006. Bearded Vulture (Gypaetus barbatus meridionalis) Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Workshop Report. Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (SSC / IUCN) / CBSG Southern Africa. Endangered Wildlife Trust, Johannesburg. The CBSG, SSC and IUCN encourage workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believe that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and recommendations expressed in this report
    [Show full text]
  • Sanderson Et Al., the Human Footprint and the Last of the Wild
    Articles The Human Footprint and the Last of the Wild ERICW. SANDERSON,MALANDING JAITEH, MARC A. LEVY,KENT H. REDFORD, ANTOINETTEV. WANNEBO,AND GILLIANWOOLMER n Genesis,God blesses humanbeings and bids us to take dominion over the fish in the sea,the birdsin the air, THE HUMANFOOTPRINT IS A GLOBAL and other We are entreatedto be fruitful every living thing. MAPOF HUMANINFLUENCE ON THE and multiply,to fill the earth,and subdueit (Gen. 1:28).The bad news, and the good news, is that we have almost suc- LANDSURFACE, WHICH SUGGESTSTHAT ceeded. Thereis little debatein scientificcircles about the impor- HUMANBEINGS ARE STEWARDS OF tance of human influenceon ecosystems.According to sci- WE LIKEIT OR NOT entists'reports, we appropriateover 40%of the net primary NATURE,WHETHER productivity(the greenmaterial) produced on Eartheach year (Vitouseket al. 1986,Rojstaczer et al.2001). We consume 35% thislack of appreciationmay be dueto scientists'propensity of the productivityof the oceanicshelf (Pauly and Christensen to expressthemselves in termslike "appropriation of net pri- 1995), and we use 60% of freshwaterrun-off (Postel et al. maryproductivity" or "exponentialpopulation growth," ab- 1996). The unprecedentedescalation in both human popu- stractionsthat require some training to understand.It may lation and consumption in the 20th centuryhas resultedin be dueto historicalassumptions about and habits inherited environmentalcrises never before encountered in the history fromtimes when human beings, as a group,had dramatically of humankindand the world (McNeill2000). E. O. Wilson less influenceon the biosphere.Now the individualdeci- (2002) claims it would now take four Earthsto meet the consumptiondemands of the currenthuman population,if Eric Sanderson(e-mail: [email protected])is associatedirector, and every human consumed at the level of the averageUS in- W.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Gas Exchange and Biomass Production in West African Sahelian and Sudanian Ecological Zones
    Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3789–3812, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3789-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Modeling gas exchange and biomass production in West African Sahelian and Sudanian ecological zones Jaber Rahimi1, Expedit Evariste Ago2,3, Augustine Ayantunde4, Sina Berger1,5, Jan Bogaert3, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl1,6, Bernard Cappelaere7, Jean-Martial Cohard8, Jérôme Demarty7, Abdoul Aziz Diouf9, Ulrike Falk10, Edwin Haas1, Pierre Hiernaux11,12, David Kraus1, Olivier Roupsard13,14,15, Clemens Scheer1, Amit Kumar Srivastava16, Torbern Tagesson17,18, and Rüdiger Grote1 1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany 2Laboratoire d’Ecologie Appliquée, Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques, Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin 3Biodiversity and Landscape Unit, Université de Liège Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Gembloux, Belgium 4International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso 5Regional Climate and Hydrology Research Group, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany 6International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya 7HydroSciences Montpellier, Université Montpellier, IRD, CNRS, Montpellier, France 8IRD, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France 9Centre de Suivi Ecologique (CSE), Dakar, Senegal 10Satellite-based Climate Monitoring, Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD), Offenbach, Germany 11Géosciences Environnement Toulouse
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Diversity in Shimba Hills National Reserve, Kenya: a Comprehensive List of Specimens and Species
    Journal of East African Natural History 106(1): 19–46 (2017) AMPHIBIAN DIVERSITY IN SHIMBA HILLS NATIONAL RESERVE, KENYA: A COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF SPECIMENS AND SPECIES Beryl A. Bwong Biogeography Research Group, Department of Environmental Sciences University of Basel, 4056 Basel , Switzerland & Herpetology Section, Zoology Department, National Museums of Kenya P.O Box 40658, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya [email protected] Joash O. Nyamache, Patrick K. Malonza, Domnick V. Wasonga, Jacob M. Ngwava Herpetology Section, Zoology Department, National Museums of Kenya P.O Box 40658, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected], [email protected] Christopher D. Barratt, Peter Nagel Biogeography Research Group, Department of Environmental Sciences University of Basel, 4056 Basel , Switzerland [email protected]; [email protected] Simon P. Loader Biogeography Research Group, Department of Environmental Sciences University of Basel, 4056 Basel , Switzerland & Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK [email protected] ABSTRACT We present the first annotated amphibian checklist of Shimba Hills National Reserve (SHNR). The list comprises of 30 currently known amphibians (28 anurans and two caecilians), which includes 11 families and 15 genera. In addition, individual records per species, distribution in the reserve and brief remarks about the species are presented. The checklist is based on information from museum collections, field guides, unpublished reports and newly collected field data. We are able to confirm the presence of two Eastern Afromontane species in the SHNR: Scolecomorphus cf. vittatus and Callulina cf. kreffti. The latter has not been recorded since the original collection of a single specimen over 50 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioseries12-Amphibians-Taita-English
    0c m 12 Symbol key 3456 habitat pond puddle river stream 78 underground day / night day 9101112131415161718 night altitude high low vegetation types shamba forest plantation prelim pages ENGLISH.indd ii 2009/10/22 02:03:47 PM SANBI Biodiversity Series Amphibians of the Taita Hills by G.J. Measey, P.K. Malonza and V. Muchai 2009 prelim pages ENGLISH.indd Sec1:i 2009/10/27 07:51:49 AM SANBI Biodiversity Series The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) was established on 1 September 2004 through the signing into force of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) No. 10 of 2004 by President Thabo Mbeki. The Act expands the mandate of the former National Botanical Institute to include responsibilities relating to the full diversity of South Africa’s fauna and ora, and builds on the internationally respected programmes in conservation, research, education and visitor services developed by the National Botanical Institute and its predecessors over the past century. The vision of SANBI: Biodiversity richness for all South Africans. SANBI’s mission is to champion the exploration, conservation, sustainable use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. SANBI Biodiversity Series publishes occasional reports on projects, technologies, workshops, symposia and other activities initiated by or executed in partnership with SANBI. Technical editor: Gerrit Germishuizen Design & layout: Elizma Fouché Cover design: Elizma Fouché How to cite this publication MEASEY, G.J., MALONZA, P.K. & MUCHAI, V. 2009. Amphibians of the Taita Hills / Am bia wa milima ya Taita. SANBI Biodiversity Series 12. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Forcing of Tree Growth in Dry Afromontane Forest Fragments of Northern Ethiopia: Evidence from Multi-Species Responses Zenebe Girmay Siyum1,2* , J
    Siyum et al. Forest Ecosystems (2019) 6:15 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0178-y RESEARCH Open Access Climate forcing of tree growth in dry Afromontane forest fragments of Northern Ethiopia: evidence from multi-species responses Zenebe Girmay Siyum1,2* , J. O. Ayoade3, M. A. Onilude4 and Motuma Tolera Feyissa2 Abstract Background: Climate-induced challenge remains a growing concern in the dry tropics, threatening carbon sink potential of tropical dry forests. Hence, understanding their responses to the changing climate is of high priority to facilitate sustainable management of the remnant dry forests. In this study, we examined the long-term climate- growth relations of main tree species in the remnant dry Afromontane forests in northern Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to assess the dendrochronological potential of selected dry Afromontane tree species and to study the influence of climatic variables (temperature and rainfall) on radial growth. It was hypothesized that there are potential tree species with discernible annual growth rings owing to the uni-modality of rainfall in the region. Ring width measurements were based on increment core samples and stem discs collected from a total of 106 trees belonging to three tree species (Juniperus procera, Olea europaea subsp. cuspidate and Podocarpus falcatus). The collected samples were prepared, crossdated, and analyzed using standard dendrochronological methods. The formation of annual growth rings of the study species was verified based on successful crossdatability and by correlating tree-ring widths with rainfall. Results: The results showed that all the sampled tree species form distinct growth boundaries though differences in the distinctiveness were observed among the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Stewardship to Protect and Sustain Wilderness Values
    Using Biodiversity Stewardship as a Means to Secure the Natural Wild Values on Communal Land in South Africa Kevin McCann, Dr Roelie Kloppers, and Dr Andrew Venter Abstract—South Africa is one of the most biodiversity-rich coun- These voluntary Biodiversity Stewardship agreements are charac- tries in the world, with much valuable biodiversity situated on a terised by innovative, pro-poor green enterprise-based approaches to range of different land tenure types, including state, private and sustainable development and the conservation of biodiversity. They communal land. Despite this, these wild lands are being lost at an aim to create a green economy where the conservation of ecosystems unprecedented rate, with the resultant loss of natural areas and and biodiversity is the foundation of sustainable development and associated ecosystem services. The challenge lies in the need to where a closer alignment of environmental and economic systems protect the unique biodiversity, by integrating the development is imperative, ensuring direct community benefit through improved needs of poverty-stricken communities with the need to secure the natural resource management. remaining natural wild places, and thereby secure the very areas on which these communities rely for their daily requirements (water, firewood, medicinal plants). Biodiversity Stewardship is increasingly becoming the principal strategy to secure land, in favour of more traditional methods such Introduction ______________________ as land acquisition. This mechanism recognises landowners as cus- As a developing country that needs to reduce poverty lev- todians of their land, and promotes and supports the wise use and els and ensure sustainable livelihoods for its people, South management of natural resources and biodiversity, through the form Africa faces critical challenges relating to the need to protect of voluntary legal agreements, thereby making rural landowners biodiversity and at the same time implement programmes effective “stewards” of their land.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK November 2000 Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 ISSUES TO CONSIDER....................................................................................................................................1 3.0 WHAT IS BIODIVERSITY?..............................................................................................................................2 4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................3 5.0 CURRENT WORLD HERITAGE SITES............................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Status, Trends and Future Dynamics of Biodiversity and Ecosystems Underpinning Nature’S Contributions to People 1
    CHAPTER 3 . STATUS, TRENDS AND FUTURE DYNAMICS OF BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEMS UNDERPINNING NATURE’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO PEOPLE 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 STATUS, TRENDS AND FUTURE DYNAMICS CHAPTER OF BIODIVERSITY AND 3 ECOSYSTEMS UNDERPINNING NATURE’S CONTRIBUTIONS CHAPTER TO PEOPLE 4 Coordinating Lead Authors Review Editors: Marie-Christine Cormier-Salem (France), Jonas Ngouhouo-Poufoun (Cameroon) Amy E. Dunham (United States of America), Christopher Gordon (Ghana) 3 CHAPTER This chapter should be cited as: Cormier-Salem, M-C., Dunham, A. E., Lead Authors Gordon, C., Belhabib, D., Bennas, N., Dyhia Belhabib (Canada), Nard Bennas Duminil, J., Egoh, B. N., Mohamed- (Morocco), Jérôme Duminil (France), Elahamer, A. E., Moise, B. F. E., Gillson, L., 5 Benis N. Egoh (Cameroon), Aisha Elfaki Haddane, B., Mensah, A., Mourad, A., Mohamed Elahamer (Sudan), Bakwo Fils Randrianasolo, H., Razaindratsima, O. H., Eric Moise (Cameroon), Lindsey Gillson Taleb, M. S., Shemdoe, R., Dowo, G., (United Kingdom), Brahim Haddane Amekugbe, M., Burgess, N., Foden, W., (Morocco), Adelina Mensah (Ghana), Ahmim Niskanen, L., Mentzel, C., Njabo, K. Y., CHAPTER Mourad (Algeria), Harison Randrianasolo Maoela, M. A., Marchant, R., Walters, M., (Madagascar), Onja H. Razaindratsima and Yao, A. C. Chapter 3: Status, trends (Madagascar), Mohammed Sghir Taleb and future dynamics of biodiversity (Morocco), Riziki Shemdoe (Tanzania) and ecosystems underpinning nature’s 6 contributions to people. In IPBES (2018): Fellow: The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Gregory Dowo (Zimbabwe) Africa. Archer, E., Dziba, L., Mulongoy, K. J., Maoela, M. A., and Walters, M. (eds.). CHAPTER Contributing Authors: Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Millicent Amekugbe (Ghana), Neil Burgess Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity (United Kingdom), Wendy Foden (South and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany, Africa), Leo Niskanen (Finland), Christine pp.
    [Show full text]