Life-History Traits of Non-Native Freshwater Fish Invaders
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Rev Fish Biol Fisheries (2015) 25:165–178 DOI 10.1007/s11160-014-9375-5 REVIEWS Life-history traits of non-native freshwater fish invaders differentiate them from natives in the Central European bioregion Joanna Grabowska • Mirosław Przybylski Received: 8 January 2014 / Accepted: 3 November 2014 / Published online: 13 November 2014 Ó The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The most successful and widespread non- some form of parental care. These life-history traits, indigenous invasive fish species occurring in the along with broad diet breath and environmental Central European bioregion are heterogeneous with tolerance, appear to facilitate the invasion of fresh- respect to their origins, taxonomy, mode of arrival, water fish in the Central European bioregion. vectors and pathways of dispersal. We surveyed whether these non-native species have common life- Keywords Non-indigenous fishes Á Reproduction Á history that might facilitate their invasion and differ- Parental care Á Invasion entiate them from native species. Ten life-history traits of 59 freshwater fish species were examined: maxi- mum body length, longevity, age and length at maturation, maximum absolute fecundity, egg size, Introduction larval size at hatching, spawning duration and type, parental investment. Principal Component Analysis An important aspect of invasion biology is the study revealed that the traits that accounted for the first two and predictions of attributes that facilitate biological principle components (86.4 % of total variation) were invasions (e.g. Ehrlich 1989; Williamson 1996; Kolar maximum body length, age and size at maturation, and Lodge 2001, 2002; Olden et al. 2006; Garcia- longevity, fecundity, egg size and larval length at Berthou 2007; Ribeiro et al. 2007), with life-history hatching. Five groups of species were distinguished by traits being of particular interest. It is impossible to cluster analysis, those comprising native fish species identify a single universal model of life history that being characterized by medium-to-large size, elevated would guarantee invasive success, i.e. propagule longevity, late maturation, high fecundity, and no pressure, establishment, dispersal and population parental care. In contrast, groups of non-native growth in a newly colonized area, since it likely invasive fish species were characterized by small-to- depend on multiple factors (Williamson 1999; Kolar medium body length, short longevity, early matura- and Lodge 2001; Sakai et al. 2001). In addition, tion, relatively low fecundity, relatively large eggs, success or failure of an introduction event depends not multiple spawning, extended reproductive seasons and only on the biological attributes of the invader but also on the recipient habitat characteristics, including both biotic and abiotic factors (Brown 1989; Moyle and & J. Grabowska ( ) Á M. Przybylski Light 1996; Williamson 1996; Sakai et al. 2001). A Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland global literature review by Jeschke et al. (2012) e-mail: [email protected] revealed that among several hypotheses that 123 166 Rev Fish Biol Fisheries (2015) 25:165–178 considered interactions of exotic invaders with their invasion process (Ribeiro et al. 2007). The suitability new environment, three of these, i.e. invasional of a particular strategy of an invader may vary meltdown, novel weapons, and enemy release, are depending on the local environmental conditions better supported by empirical evidence than other (e.g. Villeneuve et al. 2005; Fox et al. 2007; Kova´cˇ hypotheses (biotic resistance, island susceptibility, et al. 2009;Za´horska´ and Kova´cˇ 2009). Similarly, life- tens rule). The novel weapons hypothesis assumes that history traits displayed by indigenous fish are a in the exotic habitat, invasive species can have a tradeoff between the evolutionary heritage of popula- competitive advantage against native species because tions and the constraints posed by the environment they possess a novel weapon, i.e. a trait that is new to (Reynolds et al. 2005; Blank et al. 2007). Thus, they the resident community of native species and, there- are likely to be divergent from traits of species that fore, affects them negatively (Callaway and Ridenour evolved in different parts of the world. 2004). Based on fish faunistic lists, seven main bioregions Many other historical and contemporary theories of were defined for European freshwater fish (Reyjol invasion success share the prediction that successful et al. 2007). One of them, the Central European invaders are different from native species in at least in bioregion, consists of drainages from the R. Elbe on one ecological aspect this is especially well docu- the west, through the Rivers Oder, Vistula, Neman to mented for plants (e.g. MacArthur and Wilson 1967; Narva on the east, as well as of Swedish and Finnish Deahler 2003; MacDougall et al. 2009). In such a Baltic river systems. This region is characterized by a situation, the non-native species takes advantage of a highly homogenous fauna, rather low species richness, so-called ‘fitness difference’ as defined by MacDou- and the lowest level of endemism when compared with gall et al. (2009), i.e. species attributes distinguishing other European bioregions (Reyjol et al. 2007), arising the invader from the natives occupying a similar niche from geomorphological alteration of the main river and driving its competitive dominance in the novel systems in the Pleistocene. As a result the freshwater ecosystem. Likewise, a revision of invasive fish fauna of this area is relatively young, finally forming characteristics implied that introduced species are about 12,000 years ago after the end of the last glacial often quite different from natives (Garcia-Berthou period. It is composed mainly of species that recolon- 2007). ised inland waters from the Ponto-Caspian refugium Freshwater fish faunas appear particularly suscep- (Ba˘na˘rescu 1990; Hewitt 2004). This refugium had tible to deliberate introductions (Casal 2006). Further, some importance for the formation of fish fauna in traits of many non-native fish species result from three other biogeographical regions grouped by Reyjol human choice of species with particular desirable et al. (2007) into ‘the Danubian Europe’ with this fish attributes (e.g. large body-size of commercial and fauna different from the so-called ‘Peri-Meditteranea’ game fish) and/or guarantee of successful introduction group of biogeographical regions. (e.g. high ecological tolerance of harsh environmental The comparisons of life-history traits of non-native conditions; Alcaraz et al. 2005). However, there is a versus native fish species occurring in European inland growing group of invasive fish species that have been waters have already been completed for Catalonian introduced unintentionally; hence their biological streams (Vila-Gispert et al. 2005), Iberian Peninsula attributes are not directly biased by human choice. (Ribeiro et al. 2007) and the River Danube (Eros} There are several difficulties in identifying the 2005). Teletchea et al. (2009) proposed a typology for biological attributes that can be used to predict the freshwater species living in Western Europe based on invasive potential of an introduced fish species. Fish the analysis of their reproductive traits, as a frame- are known to have high phenotypic plasticity (Wooton work for the future domestication of other fish species. 1990), with plasticity of their life-history traits more However, such an analysis and comparison of native important for invasion success than their genetic and invasive fish fauna life-history traits has never variation (Valiente et al. 2010). Life histories may be been conducted for the Central European biogeo- modified as the population passes through a series of graphical region, the second largest region identified stages of invasion (Bøhn et al. 2004; Fox et al. 2007; by Reyjol et al. (2007). Britton et al. 2008; Brandner et al. 2013b), with Taking into account the geographical position of different traits important during distinct stages of the Poland and its hydrological system, it offers a good 123 Rev Fish Biol Fisheries (2015) 25:165–178 167 model for the analysis of life-history traits of fish carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, bighead carp Hyp- species in the Central European biogeographical ophthalmichthys nobilis and acipenserids) (Grab- region sensu Reyjol et al. (2007). At present, 52 owska et al. 2010) except for two: rainbow trout autochthonous fish species and sub-species plus four Oncorhynus mykiss and common carp Cyprinus car- lampreys occur in Polish inland waters (Witkowski pio, which are the most often widely introduced and et al. 2004). Additionally, 26 exotic species were abundant commercial species. recorded as acclimatized, casual or naturalized in Ten life-history traits were considered: (1) maxi- Poland and 19 of them live permanently in the wild, mum body length (mm); (2) longevity, i.e. maximum constituting 24 % of the country’s freshwater fish age (in years); (3) age at maturation (in years); (4) total fauna (Grabowska et al. 2010; Witkowski and Grab- length at maturation (mm); (5) maximum absolute owska 2012). Some of these species depend on fecundity; (6) maximum egg diameter (of fully devel- stocking, while only 11 species have established oped ovaries; mm); (7) larval standard length at self-sustained populations in the wild and among hatching (mm); (8) duration