Grass Strip Corridors in Agricultural Landscapes Enhance Nest-Site

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grass Strip Corridors in Agricultural Landscapes Enhance Nest-Site Grass Strip Corridors in Agricultural Landscapes Enhance Nest-Site Colonization by Solitary Wasps Author(s): Andrea Holzschuh, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter and Teja Tscharntke Source: Ecological Applications, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Jan., 2009), pp. 123-132 Published by: Ecological Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27645953 Accessed: 25-05-2015 10:41 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27645953?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecological Applications. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 130.92.9.58 on Mon, 25 May 2015 10:41:50 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Ecological Applications, 19(1), 2009, pp. 123-132 ? 2009 by theEcological Society of America Grass corridors in enhance strip agricultural landscapes nest-site colonization by solitary wasps Andrea Holzschuh,1,3 Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter,2 and Teja Tscharntke1 xAgroecology, Georg-August University, Waldweg 26, D-37073 G?ttingen, Germany 2Animal Ecology I, University of Bayreuth, Universit?tsstr. 30, D-95447 Bayreuth, Germany Abstract. Corridors that connect otherwise isolated habitats have often been proposed as a to management strategy mitigate negative effects of habitat fragmentation. Non-crop corridors may have the potential to enhance the connectivity for arthropod predators in cropland landscapes, especially for species that require multiple habitats, such as cavity use nesting wasps which wooded habitat for nesting and grassland habitat for foraging. However, the effects of corridors in nonexperimental landscapes have been rarely examined. We studied the species richness and abundance of cavity-nesting wasps and their parasitoids in standardized trap nests located in three habitat types (forest edge, hedge, grass strip) and in three grass-strip types (connected to a forest edge, slightly isolated, highly isolated from a forest edge). Species richness and the abundance of wasps (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae, Eumenidae, Pompilidae) were highest at forest edges, which provide natural nesting sites, and lowest in grass strips, with few natural nesting sites. Wasp abundance in grass strips connected to forest edges was 270% higher than in slightly isolated grass strips and 600% higher than in highly isolated grass strips. The abundance of caterpillar-hunting eumenid wasps was 600% higher in connected grass strips than in slightly and highly isolated grass strips. Species richness of wasps was enhanced by 180% in connected grass strips compared to highly isolated grass strips. Parasitism rates were not directly influenced by habitat or grass-strip type, but increased was with increasing parasitoid diversity that higher at forest edges than in grass strips. We conclude that grass-strip corridors enhance the colonization of nesting sites, presumably by facilitating wasp movements. In agricultural landscapes, where nesting sites are limited and food availability changes frequently, rapid colonization of nests may enhance population viability. Higher wasp abundance in connected nesting sites may be directly linked to higher biocontrol of pest caterpillars within the foraging range around nests. Although grass strips can reduce the negative effects of habitat fragmentation, non-crop habitats such as forest habitats and hedges providing nesting sites are required within the home range of wasps to allow reproduction in agricultural landscapes. Key words: cereal fields; connectivity; dispersal; fallow strips; field margins; forest edges; habitat fragmentation; hedges; natural enemies; parasitoids; predators; trap nests. Introduction strip corridors that connect remnant non-crop habitats in a crop field matrix may help to conserve insect Habitat loss and fragmentation are considered as the diversity and associated ecosystem functions in inten main threats to biodiversity (Saunders et al. 1991, sively used agricultural landscapes. Fahrig 2003). Corridors consisting of small habitat Traditionally, agricultural landscapes consisted of a strips connecting otherwise isolated habitat patches have small-scale patchwork of crop fields, non-crop habitats, been proposed as a management strategy to mitigate and connecting non-crop strips such as hedges and grass negative effectsof habitat fragmentation (Simberloffet strips. Many of these non-crop habitats were lost during al. 1992, Rosenberg et al. 1997, Beier and Noss 1998). the last 50 years, when agricultural production was They are expected to facilitate movements between intensified and the area of crop fields expanded in many habitats, to increase population sizes in habitat patches, regions (Tilman et al. 2001, Benton et al. 2003). The loss and to extinction of small The prevent populations. of non-crop area in agricultural landscapes and the of this was to purpose landscape-scale study quantify resulting decline of species diversity have been well corridor effects on nest colonization of cavity-nesting documented (Kremen et al. 2002, Steffan-Dewenter wasps and their interactions with parasitoids. Grass 2003, Clough et al. 2005, Gabriel et al. 2005, Hendrickx et al. 2007, Holzschuh et al. 2007, ?ckinger and Smith 2007, Kohler et al. 2008). Even small non-crop strips, Manuscript received 22 February 2008; revised 22 May 2008; such as field that are established accepted 29 May 2008. Corresponding Editor: J. A. Powell. margin strips easily 3 E-mail: [email protected] along the borders of crop fields, have been shown to be 123 This content downloaded from 130.92.9.58 on Mon, 25 May 2015 10:41:50 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions ANDREA124 HOLZSCHUH ET AL. Ecological Applications Vol. 19,No. 1 important habitats for many species (e.g., Pywell et al. quently affected by local population extinctions (Kruess 2005, Marshall et al. 2006, Holzschuh et al. 2008). and Tscharntke 1994, Holt 2002). Furthermore, para However, there are few studies focusing on whether sitoids may have more restrictive dispersal abilities and grass strips are effective in reducing isolation for insects often perceive isolation at smaller scales than their hosts in agricultural landscapes (but see Joyce et al. 1999, (van Nouhuys and Hanski 2002). Thus, corridors may alter in of the Collinge et al. 2000, Berggren et al. 2002, Baum et al. trophic interactions favor parasitoids. 2004, S?derstr?m and Hedblom 2007). The only Further knowledge about corridor effects on trophic use interactions be critical for corridors replicated study assessing the of grass strips by may implementing no as successful conservation that aim to flying insects in agricultural landscapes found strategies promote corridor effects for butterflies (?ckinger and Smith one specific trophic level such as wasps as predators of insects. 2008). Most corridor studies on species of open habitats pest a in real were performed in modified landscapes consisting of Using large-scale approach agricultural we established standardized nests to cleared land surrounded by forest (reviewed in Beier and landscapes, trap Noss 1998, Debinski and Holt 2000, ?ckinger and study how habitat type (forest edge, hedge, grass strip) Smith 2008). However, these results cannot be trans and grass-strip type (connected, slightlyisolated, highly a influenced the colonization of these ferred to agricultural landscapes that consist of isolated) nesting patchwork of habitats differing in habitat quality and sites. First, we hypothesized that species richness and disturbance level. abundances of wasps in trap nests should increase with are a of natural sites and Organisms in agricultural landscapes adapted to increasing availability nesting thereforeshould be in than in highly variable environment and are often characterized higher hedges grass strips use. and at forest than in by high mobility and multi-habitat Cavity-nesting higher edges hedges. Second, richness and abundances of in nests in wasps depend on tunnel nests in tree trunks and species wasps trap should be most similar to forest when branches in non-crop habitats. Additionally, they visit grass strips edges a corridor connects nests and forest We multiple non-crop habitats and crop fields for provi trap edge. and of sioning theirbrood with arthropod prey and for feeding hypothesized that species richness abundance should be in connected than in on floral nectar (Klein et al. 2004, Tylianakis et al. 2005). wasps higher grass strips isolated with no connection to a For multi-habitat users, movements do not only allow slightly grass strips forest in 200 m and lowest in colonization of new habitat patches and exchanges edge distance, highly isolated without forest in the between populations, but are required for daily foraging grass strips edge vicinity we that nest colonization in patches separated from the nesting habitat. In this (>600 m). Third, expected trap of way,
Recommended publications
  • Read the Decision
    Decision Date 5 February 2021 Application number APP203875 Application type To import for release and/or release from containment any new organism under section 34 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 Applicant Tasman District Council Date of hearing/consideration 17 December 2020 Date Application received 14 September 2020 Considered by A decision-making committee of the Environmental Protection Authority (the Committee)1 Dr Nick Roskruge (Chair) Dr John Taylor Mr Peter Cressey Purpose of the application To import and release two parasitoids, Metoecus paradoxus and Volucella inanis as biological control agents for the invasive German and common wasps (Vespula germanica and V. vulgaris). New organism approved Metoecus paradoxus Linnaeus 1761 Volucella inanis Linnaeus 1758 1 The Committee referred to in this decision is the subcommittee that has made the decision on this application under delegated authority in accordance with section 18A of the Act. Decision APP203875 Summary of decision 1. Application APP203875 to import and release two parasitoids, Metoecus paradoxus and Volucella inanis, as biological control agents (BCAs) for the invasive German and common wasps (Vespula germanica and V. vulgaris), in New Zealand, was lodged under section 34 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 (the Act). 2. The application was considered in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act and of the HSNO (Methodology) Order 1998 (the Methodology). 3. The Committee has approved the application in accordance with section 38(1)(a) of the Act. Application and consideration process 4. The application was formally received on 14 September 2020. 5. The applicant, Tasman District Council, applied to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to import and release two parasitoids, Metoecus paradoxus and Volucella inanis, as BCAs for the invasive German and common wasps (Vespula germanica and V.
    [Show full text]
  • Bees and Wasps of the East Sussex South Downs
    A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 Abstract For six years between 2003 and 2008, over 100 site visits were made to fifteen chalk grassland and chalk heath sites within the South Downs of Vice-county 14 (East Sussex). This produced a list of 227 bee and wasp species and revealed the comparative frequency of different species, the comparative richness of different sites and provided a basic insight into how many of the species interact with the South Downs at a site and landscape level. The study revealed that, in addition to the character of the semi-natural grasslands present, the bee and wasp fauna is also influenced by the more intensively-managed agricultural landscapes of the Downs, with many species taking advantage of blossoming hedge shrubs, flowery fallow fields, flowery arable field margins, flowering crops such as Rape, plus plants such as buttercups, thistles and dandelions within relatively improved pasture. Some very rare species were encountered, notably the bee Halictus eurygnathus Blüthgen which had not been seen in Britain since 1946. This was eventually recorded at seven sites and was associated with an abundance of Greater Knapweed. The very rare bees Anthophora retusa (Linnaeus) and Andrena niveata Friese were also observed foraging on several dates during their flight periods, providing a better insight into their ecology and conservation requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hymenoptera: Vespoidea: Eumenidae) in New Zealand
    New Zealand Entomologist, 1994, Vol. 17 29 REFERENCES Baylis, G.T.S., 1948: Vegetation of Great Island, Three Kings group. Records ofthe Auckland Institute and Museum 3: 239-252. , 1951: Incipient forest regeneration on Great Island, Three Kings group. Records ofthe Auckland Institute and Museum 4: 103-109. , 1958: A botanical survey of the small islands of the Three Kings group. Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum 5: 1-12. Brook, F.J. ; Laurenson, C.M., 1992: Ecology and morphological variation in Placostylus bollonsi (Gastropoda: Bulimulidae) at Three Kings Islands, New Zealand. Records ofthe Auckland Institute and Museum 29: 135-166. Cranwell, L.M., 1962: Endemism and isolation in the Three Kings Islands, New Zealand- with notes on pollen and spore types of the endemics. Records ofthe Auckland Institute andMuseum 5: 215-232. Hayward. B.W. ; Moore, P.R., 1987: Geology of the Three Kings Islands, northern New Zealand. Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum 24: 215-232. Ramsay, G.W., 1971: The D.S.I.R. Entomology Division 1970 expedition to the Three Kings Islands. New Zealand Entomologist 5: 13-17. Taylor, R.W., 1962: The ants of the Three Kings Islands. Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum 5: 251-254. Biology of Ancistrocerus gazella (Hymenoptera: Vespoidea: Eumenidae) in New Zealand A.C. HARRIS Otago Museum, P.O. Box 6202, Great King Street, Dunedin, New Zealand ABSTRACT Ancistrocerus gazella (Panzer, 1798) is common in Central Otago, New Zealand. Details are provided of its typically tubular, generally multicelled nests in hollow stems, artificial trap nests, abandoned wood-boring insect galleries, cracks and holes in stone walls and old nail and bolt holes in cement, concrete and wood.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination, Biological Control, and Nature Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes
    Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Pollination, Biological Control, and Nature Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes Gorm Shackelford Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Biology September 2014 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own, except where work which has formed part of jointly-authored publications has been included. The contribution of the candidate and the other authors to this work has been explicitly indicated below. The candidate confirms that appropriate credit has been given within the thesis where reference has been made to the work of others. Chapter 2 is based on a jointly-authored publication [Shackelford G., Steward, P. R., Benton, T. G., Kunin, W. E., Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Sait, S. M. (2013). Comparison of pollinators and natural enemies: a meta-analysis of landscape and local effects on abundance and richness in crops. Biological Reviews 88(4):1002–1021]. The candidate designed the research, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote and revised the manuscript for this publication. Peter Steward contributed to data collection. The other authors supervised the research and gave feedback on the manuscript. A plural pronoun (“we”) is used in parts of this thesis, and this is not meant to suggest that the candidate (“I”) is not the author, but it is meant to acknowledge the feedback that others have given, or to prepare these parts of the thesis for jointly-authored submissions to scientific journals. All of Chapter 2 was written only by the candidate. Chapter 3 is based on a jointly-authored manuscript [Shackelford G.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Communities in a Modified Isolated Raised Bog Compared to an Intact Raised Bog in New Zealand
    Invertebrate communities in a modified isolated raised bog compared to an intact raised bog in New Zealand C.H. Watts1, B.R. Clarkson1, V.M. Cave2, D. Thornburrow1, S. Thorpe3 1 Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton, New Zealand 2 AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 3115, Hamilton, New Zealand 3 Independent researcher, Auckland, New Zealand _______________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY The effect of modifying New Zealand’s threatened peat bogs on invertebrate communities is poorly known, despite their susceptibility to disturbance and their ecological significance. Using Malaise traps, we surveyed and compared terrestrial invertebrates in a remnant modified bog (Moanatuatua) isolated in an agricultural landscape and a community in an intact large bog (Kopuatai) in New Zealand. On average, more invertebrates were caught in the modified bog than in the intact bog. In addition, observed mean abundances for Diptera were higher at the modified bog. In contrast, total and geometric mean abundance of Coleoptera was significantly lower in the modified bog compared to the intact bog. We found no evidence of differences in species richness of Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera between the two bogs. Introduced species were more common in the modified bog. Ordination results indicated a difference in invertebrate community composition between the two bogs, and in addition the modified bog plots separated according to their distance from the wetland edge. Our results indicate that, within a modified isolated bog, native invertebrates can survive, and that some specialised and threatened species can thrive. However, the lower proportion of native Diptera and Lepidoptera taxa abundance in the modified bog is reason for concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Pollinators Along the Area 9 Road Network
    Inspiring change for Important Invertebrate Areas in the UK 11th September 2014 Susan Thompson - Grants & Trusts Officer Saving the small things that run the planet Steven Falk March 2017 1 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction and background .................................................................................................... 4 Site selection ............................................................................................................................. 4 Methods .................................................................................................................................. 10 Results ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Total number of pollinators recorded ............................................................................ 16 Most frequent pollinators .............................................................................................. 17 Most abundant pollinators ............................................................................................. 18 Total flowers recorded ................................................................................................... 18 Most frequent flowers ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Solitary Bees in the UK
    Promoting pollination with bee houses Besides the familiar bumble bees and honey bees, which live in colonies, there are approximately 220 species of solitary bees in the UK. They are called 'solitary' because each bee builds individual nests for their larvae, although some may do so communally. Most solitary species nest in tunnels or holes in the ground. Other bees, and some wasps as well, build their nests in naturally occurring cavities, from cracks in stones to hollow stems of dead plants or holes in wood made by wood-boring insects. These cavity-nesting bees and wasps readily occupy artificial nests made of drilled wooden blocks, paper tubes, or bundles of reed or bamboo stems. Once a bee or wasp occupies a cavity, it begins constructing a series of compartments (brood cells), each provisioned with pollen and nectar (in the case of bees) or paralyzed insects (wasps) as food for its offspring (Figure 1). When the cells are finished, the nest entrance is sealed with a plug made of mud or leaves, depending on the species (Figure 2). The eggs soon hatch and the larvae develop by eating the pollen and nectar mixture (bees) or prey (wasps). The larvae then pupate, and after a period of dormancy, which may extend to the following year for some species, adults emerge to start the cycle over again. Figure 1. Three brooding cells from a red mason bee nest. Each cell contains pollen-nectar provisions and an egg. Male bees emerge first, therefore their eggs are laid last, closer to the nest entrance.
    [Show full text]
  • Wasps of the Family Vespidae (Hymenoptera) of the Crimean Peninsula 193-233 Entomofauna 39/1 Heft 10: 193-233 Ansfelden, 2
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomofauna Jahr/Year: 2018 Band/Volume: 0039 Autor(en)/Author(s): Fateryga Alexander Artikel/Article: Wasps of the family Vespidae (Hymenoptera) of the Crimean Peninsula 193-233 Entomofauna 39/1 Heft 10: 193-233 Ansfelden, 2. Januar 2018 Wasps of the family Vespidae (Hymenoptera) of the Crimean Peninsula Alexander V. FATERYGA Abstract The review of 89 species in 31 genera is given based on 10,500 examined collection specimens of vespid wasps. Main literature reports from Crimea, examined material, and description of general distribution are given for each species. Lectotypes of Lionotus nigricornis MORAWITZ, 1885 and Microdynerus bifidus MORAWITZ, 1885 are designated. A male of Paragymnomerus signaticollis tauricus KOSTYLEV, 1940 is described. Taxonomic status of Eumenes crimensis BLÜTHGEN, 1938 and Katamenes tauricus DE SAUSSURE, 1855 is considered to be doubtful. Key words: potter wasps, mason wasps, social wasps, fauna, Crimea, Russia, Eastern Europe. Zusammenfassung Basierend auf der Untersuchung von 10.500 Exemplaren aus verschiedenen wissenschaftlichen Sammlungen umfasst die Fauna der Faltenwespen (Vespidae) der Krim 89 Arten aus 31 Gattungen. Für jede Art werden die relevanten Literaturangaben zum Vorkommen auf der Krim, das untersuchte Material und eine Beschreibung der Gesamtverbreitung angegeben. Lektotypen von Lionotus nigricornis MORAWITZ, 1885 und von Microdynerus bifidus MORAWITZ, 1885 werden designiert. Das Männchen von Paragymnomerus signaticollis tauricus KOSTYLEV, 1940 wird beschrieben. Der taxonomische Status von Eumenes crimensis BLÜTHGEN, 1938 und Katamenes tauricus DE SAUSSURE, 1855 ist unklar. Резюме На основании 10 500 изученных коллекционных экземпляров дан обзор 89 видов из 31 рода семейства Vespidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Fragments' Contribution to the Natural Biological Control
    755 Vol.54, n. 4: pp. 755-760, July-August 2011 BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF ISSN 1516-8913 Printed in Brazil BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Forest Fragments’ Contribution to the Natural Biological Control of Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Maize Eduardo Henrique Santana Sousa, Michela Costa Batista Matos, Ruanno Silva Almeida and Adenir Vieira Teodoro *1,2 1Universidade Estadual do Maranhão; Campus Universitário Paulo VI, s/n; 65054-970; São Luís - MA - Brasil. 2Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros; Av. Beira Mar, 3250, 49025-040; Aracaju - SE - Brasil ABSTRACT The present work evaluated the influence of forest distance on predatory solitary wasps ’ abundance and richness and its relation to the natural biological control of the fall armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda Smith – Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in maize. The study consisted of two parallel lines of six experimental maize plots located at an increasing distance from a forest edge. Four trap-nests were placed in the vertices of each plot of the first line to evaluate the abundance and species richness of predatory solitary wasps. The larvae of the fall armyworm were sampled weekly by inspecting ten randomly chosen plants per plot. Predatory solitary wasp abundance (but not species richness ) decreased whilst the fall armyworm abundance increased with the distance from the forest. Moreover, population densities of predatory solitary wasps and the fall armyworm were negatively correlated. Results suggested that the crop plantations located near forest fragments might benefit from the reduced pest problems as a result of increased natural biological control. Key words : predatory solitary wasps, fall armyworm, ecosystem services, natural biological control INTRODUCTION causing loss of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Sphecos: a Forum for Aculeate Wasp Researchers
    SPHECOS A FORUM FOR ACULEATE WASP RESEARCHERS ARNOLD S. 1\i'ENKE. Editor Terry Nuhn, Editorial Assistant Systematic Entomology Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA c/o U. S. National Museum of Natural History Washington DC 20560 (202) ~82 1803 NUMBER 15, JULY, 1987 Editorial Stuff Sphecos 15 wraps up our double issue. Included here are some lengthy scientific notes. collecting reports and recent literature. I'd like once more to thank Rebecca Friedman Stanger and Ludmila Kassianoff for making some translations (French and Russian respectively). The figure that I used on the masthead is from an interesting paper by H. Biirgis (see recent literature). The wasp is the embolemid Ampulicomorpha confusa Ashmead. If any of you would like to submit drawings for use on the masthead of future issues of Sphecos send them to me. Keep in mind that they should be simple, clear line drawings, and it would be very helpful if they were in the appropriate size to fit although I can reduce large figures. Scientific Notes ZETA ARGILLACEUM ON THE MOVE -- by Lionel Stange (Florida State Dept. of Agriculture. Gainesville. Fla. 32601) . Menke & Stange (1986, Fla. Ent. 69:697) give the first records of Zeta argillaceum (Linnaeus) for Florida (Dade Co.). The earliest record was from Miami, July, 1975. A recent collecting trip to the Florida Keys made by Charles Porter and I tumed up three new records. One male Zeta was taken at Tavemier, Key Largo, on January 8, 1987. Another male was taken in the Lower Keys at the Botanical Garden on Stock Island. Four males and three females were taken on Key West behind the airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Sphecos: a Forum for Aculeate Wasp Researchers
    SPHECOS Number 6 - November 1982 A Newsletter for Aculeate Wasp Researchers Arnold S. Menke, editor Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA, ARS c/o U. S. National Museum of Natural History Washington DC 20560 Notes from the Editor This issue contains a lot of research news, quite a few travel reports, two obituaries, information on the Oxford Museum Collection, and a variety of other material. Please keep sending me reports of your activities for inclusion in the next issue or else Sphecos will gradually diminish in size. There will be a gathering of hymenopterists from all over North America at the Annual Meeting of the Entomological Society of America at Toronto, Canada, this December. The purpose of this meeting is to establish a society and journal for hymenopterists. Your editor will attend; a summary of the meeting will appear in the next issue of Sphecos. In the last issue I listed the names of approximately 100 people who had not returned the Sphecos questionnaire, noting that they had been dropped from the active mailing list as a result. The response to this list was underwhelming - only a handful of people listed sent in the questionnaire - so my task of putting issues in envelopes and afixing mailing labels has been reduced by quite a bit. I would like to thank Vivian Spriggs for typing most of this issue of Sphecos. Research News/Help Needed 0. W. Richards (89 ST. Stephen's Road, Ealing, London Wl3 8JA), has four papers in preparation dealing with the following: vespid larvae, Arabian Masaridae, Arabian Vespidae, and corrections and additions to his "Social Wasps of the Americas".
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Diversity in a Nutshell: Testing for Small-Scale Effects on Trap Nesting Wild Bees and Wasps 1 1 1 1,2 1,3 YVONNE FABIAN, NADINE SANDAU, ODILE T
    Plant diversity in a nutshell: testing for small-scale effects on trap nesting wild bees and wasps 1 1 1 1,2 1,3 YVONNE FABIAN, NADINE SANDAU, ODILE T. BRUGGISSER, ALEXANDRE AEBI, PATRIK KEHRLI, 1,4 1 1, RUDOLF P. R OHR, RUSSELL E. NAISBIT, AND LOUIS-FE´ LIX BERSIER 1University of Fribourg, Unit of Ecology & Evolution, Chemin du Muse´e 10, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland 2University of Neuchaˆtel, Laboratory of Soil Biology, Emile-Argand 11, 2000 Neuchaˆtel, Switzerland 3Station de recherche Agroscope Changins-Wa¨denswil ACW, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland 4Integrative Ecology Group, Estacion Biologica de Don˜ana, EBD-CSIC, 41092 Sevilla, Spain Citation: Fabian, Y., N. Sandau, O. T. Bruggisser, A. Aebi, P. Kehrli, R. P. Rohr, R. E. Naisbit, and L.-F. Bersier. 2014. Plant diversity in a nutshell: testing for small-scale effects on trap nesting wild bees and wasps. Ecosphere 5(2):18. http://dx. doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00375.1 Abstract. Declining plant species richness in agro-ecosystems and thus reduced habitat quality can have cascading effects on ecosystem functioning, leading to reduced pollination and biological control. Here we test if plant diversity can affect arthropod diversity and abundance on a very small scale, manipulating plant species richness (2, 6, 12 and 20 sown species) in small adjacent subplots (6 3 9 m) in 10 wildflower strips in an agricultural landscape. We simultaneously analyzed the effect of plant species richness, vegetation structure, and plant composition on the species richness and abundance of cavity-nesting wild bees, wasps, their prey and natural enemies, and on the structure of their food webs.
    [Show full text]