Adult Emergence Order in a Community of Cavity-Nesting Bees and Wasps, And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/556456; this version posted February 21, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Adult emergence order in a community of cavity-nesting bees and wasps, and their parasites J Scott MacIvor Department of Biological Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M1C 1A4 email: [email protected] phone: +1-416-208-8191 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/556456; this version posted February 21, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Evaluating resource use and overlap through time and space among and within species having similar habitat requirements informs community-level conservation and coexistence, efforts to monitor species at-risk and biological invasions. Many species share common nesting requirements; one example are cavity-nest bees and wasps, which provision nests in dark and dry holes in wood, plant stems, or other plant-based materials that can be bundled together into ‘trap nests’. In this study, the adult emergence order of 47 species of solitary cavity-nesting bees and wasps, and their parasites (total N>8000 brood cells) were obtained from two hundred identical trap nests set up each year (over three years) to survey these populations across Toronto, Canada and the surrounding region. All brood cells collected were reared in a growth chamber under constant warming temperature and humidity to determine species identity, and adult emergence order. This order ranged from 0 to 38 days, with all mason bees (Osmia spp.) emerging within the first two days, and the invasive resin bee species, Megachile sculpturalis Smith significantly later than all others. Late emerging species i) exhibited significantly greater intraspecific variation in mean emergence day and ii) were significantly larger in body size, compared to early emerging species. Detailing natural history information at the species- and community-level, such as the adult emergence order of coexisting cavity-nesting bees and wasps and their parasites, can inform the timing of deployment of trap nests to support and monitor target species, and refine experimental design to study these easily-surveyed and essential insect communities. Keywords: Hymenoptera; Osmia; Megachile; nest box; trap nest; interspecific variation; niche partitioning; host-parasite interactions 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/556456; this version posted February 21, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Introduction Interspecific partitioning in the timing of similar, critical life-history stages is an evolutionary adaptation used to minimize resource overlap and competition among species (Richards 1927; Schoener 1974; Albrecht and Gotelli 2001; Martin et al. 2004; Taylor et al. 2014). For example, many nest provisioning solitary bee and wasp species share similar nesting location preferences, yet have evolved to partition these resources in order to coexist in time (Wcislo and Cane 1996; Hoehn et al. 2008) and space (Willmer and Corbet 1981; Tylianakis et al. 2005). Intraspecific variation at these critical life-history stages can also be important in determining fitness among individuals within the same species (Bolnick et al. 2011). Variation in emergence from nests as adults may be linked to evolutionary adaptations to local environmental conditions that optimize reproductive and foraging success. In temperate regions, solitary bees and wasps are active for short overlapping periods in a season, which are linked to the availability of preferred resources (Lindsey 1958; Minckley et al. 1994; Leong and Thorp 1999). The remainder of the year is spent as an immature in a nest constructed by the mother (with some exceptions). Considerable information is available from field and laboratory studies on the lifecycle, incubation period, and adult emergence order of specific solitary bee species managed for pollination in agriculture, such as Osmia lignaria Say (Bosch et al. 2000), Osmia cornifrons (Radoszkowski) (White et al. 2009), or Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) (Tepedino and Parker 1986). However, there are relatively little data on community-wide adult emergence order or knowledge of intraspecific variation in emergence order of most coexisting solitary bees, and especially wasps, many of which are important predators in biological communities (Budrienė et al. 2004; Forrest and Thomson 2011; Fründ et al. 2013). Many solitary bee and wasp species provision nests in cavities above ground (e.g. pithy or hollowed out plant stems, beetle-bored 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/556456; this version posted February 21, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. holes in wood), hereafter ‘cavity-nesting bees and wasps’ (Stephen and Osgood 1965; Bohart 1972; Williams et al. 2010). For many cavity-nesting species, artificial nests that represent the natural nesting conditions can be made by gathering ‘nesting tubes’ (e.g. drilled holes in wood, plant stems, or paper cardboard tubes) together, commonly referred to as ‘trap nests’ (Figure 1) (Krombein 1967). Trap nests are widely used to survey cavity-nesting bees and wasps, and their parasites, which include cleptoparasitic bees and wasps, as well as parasitoid wasps, flies, and beetles (Tscharntke et al. 1998; Praz et al. 2008; MacIvor 2017). Identifying nests occurring naturally in the landscape is time consuming and difficult to retrieve in sufficient numbers needed for experiments. On the other hand, rearing cavity-nesting bees and wasps, and their parasites to adulthood from individuals obtained from nesting tubes in trap nests is a useful way to identify species-level interactions and community-level patterns at a local or landscape scale (Staab et al. 2018). Many other studies utilize trap nests to evaluate relationships between species diversity and resource utilization, and in response to environmental change (Yocum et al. 2005; Sheffield et al. 2008; O’Neill et al. 2011; Fliszkiewicz et al. 2012; Fründ et al. 2013). There are applications as well; for example, to support species of concern, the addition of foraging plants (Sheffield et al. 2008) or accelerate the release of bees reared on mass to synchronize with target crops (Bosch et al. 2000). 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/556456; this version posted February 21, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Figure 1. A trap nest used to study cavity-nesting bees and wasps. The cardboard paper ‘nesting tubes’ are inserted into a piece of pink insulation board fitted into a white PVC pipe for support and protection from rain. In this study, the adult emergence order among and within 47 coexisting species of cavity-nesting bees and wasps, and their parasites were quantified from individuals obtained from trap nests and reared in a laboratory setting at constant temperature and humidity, to represent a spring warming period. The main objective was to map emergence order in this community of cavity-nesting bees and wasps, and their parasites to improve management of these important taxa, for example, to 1) support an abundance of target species, 2) aid in the detection of invasive species, or 3) monitor host-parasite interactions as environmental indicators. Using these data, I also evaluate two hypotheses. First, that intraspecific variation in 5 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/556456; this version posted February 21, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. emergence time will increase in late emerging species because they incubate longer than early emerging species, and fluctuations in the environment can affect development time (O’Neill et al. 2011). Second, although Bosch and Kemp (2002) noted no relationship between intraspecific body size and adult emergence in the European Orchard bee, Osmia cornuta, I predicted body size differences between species in the bee and wasp community would affect interspecific adult emergence order, with larger bodied species emerging significantly later than smaller bodied species, because body size is generally correlated with development time to adult (Garcia-Barros, 2000). Methods The cavity-nesting bees and wasps, and their parasites examined here were obtained from a survey of 200 trap nests set up each year (one per site) from May to October for three years (2011-2013) throughout the city of Toronto and surrounding region. The sites were a minimum 250m apart and spread over an area encompassing approximately 745km2. Trap nests were made of white PVC piping that was 10cm in diameter and 28cm in length, a circular faceplate made of insulation board into which 30 cardboard nesting tubes (Custom Paper Tubes, Cleveland, OH) were inserted (10 of each of three tube diameters; 3.4mm, 5.5mm, 7.6mm; all 15cm in length) at one end, and the opposite end was blocked with a PVC pipe cap (Figure 1).