Forward Looking Statement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Forward Looking Statement Forward Looking Statement This presentation contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans, strategies, anticipated events, trends and other matters that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events, achievements or results and are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances that might cause future events, achievements or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In particular, our business might be materially and adversely affected by uncertainties affecting real estate businesses generally as well as the following, among other factors: our substantial debt, stated value of preferred shares and our high leverage ratio; constraining leverage, interest and tangible net worth covenants under our 2013 Revolving Facility, our 2014 Term Loans and our 2015 Term Loan; potential losses on impairment of certain long-lived assets, such as real estate, or of intangible assets, such as goodwill, including such losses that we might be required to record in connection with any dispositions of assets; changes to our corporate management team and any resulting modifications to our business strategies; our ability to refinance our existing indebtedness when it matures, on favorable terms or at all; our ability to raise capital, including through the issuance of equity or equity-related securities if market conditions are favorable, through joint ventures or other partnerships, through sales of properties or interests in properties, or through other actions; our ability to identify and execute on suitable acquisition opportunities and to integrate acquired properties into our portfolio; our partnerships and joint ventures with third parties to acquire or develop properties; our short- and long-term liquidity position; current economic conditions and their effect on employment, consumer confidence and spending and the corresponding effects on tenant business performance, prospects, solvency and leasing decisions and on our cash flows, and the value and potential impairment of our properties; general economic, financial and political conditions, including credit market conditions, changes in interest rates or unemployment; changes in the retail industry, including consolidation and store closings, particularly among anchor tenants; the effects of online shopping and other uses of technology on our retail tenants; our ability to sell properties that we seek to dispose of or our ability to obtain estimated sale prices; our ability to maintain and increase property occupancy, sales and rental rates, in light of the relatively high number of leases that have expired or are expiring in the next two years; acts of violence at malls, including our properties, or at other similar spaces, and the potential effect on traffic and sales; increases in operating costs that cannot be passed on to tenants; risks relating to development and redevelopment activities which could be subject to delays or other risks and might not yield the returns we anticipate; concentration of our properties in the Mid-Atlantic region; changes in local market conditions, such as the supply of or demand for retail space, or other competitive factors; and potential dilution from any capital raising transactions. Additional factors that might cause future events, achievements or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements include those discussed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and in any subsequent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in the section entitled "Item 1A. Risk Factors." We do not intend to update or revise any forward- looking statements to reflect new information, future events or otherwise. 2 ITINERARY Management Presentation 8:30-11:00 AM Q&A 11:00 AM – noon Travel to Fashion Outlets of Philadelphia 12:30 – 1:15 PM On Site Fashion Outlets of Philadelphia Presentation 1:30 – 2:30 PM 3 Joseph F. Coradino CEO 4 BREAKING NEWS Non refundable deposit received for three mall package Non refundable deposit received for Palmer Park Mall 5 KEY CATALYSTS Our future is bright Move to QUALITY is pronounced and accelerating RESULTS achieved are demonstrable and sustainable Experiencing a dramatic increase in new retail DEMAND REDEVELOPMENT opportunities are realizable and impactful Balance sheet is STRONG and improving 6 SHAREHOLDER VALUE BACK TO THE FUTURE A LOOK BACK AND FORWARD 7 A VISION REALIZED A sustainable, growing platform In 2012 we outlined a strategy focused on 4 key objectives to drive NAV and shareholder value: Balance Sheet Operational Improvement Excellence Elevating Portfolio Positioning for Quality Growth We have created a sustainable, stable platform with a flexible balance sheet with realizable growth opportunities. 8 NEXT STAGE A sustainable, growing platform $500 psf in sales More than 50% of NOI generated from top 10 MSAs Sustained NOI growth greater than 3% Leverage below 48% 9 WHERE WE ARE Goals Per 2012 Investor Day Enhanced Portfolio Quality Strengthened the Balance Sheet12/31/15 Measure of Success 9/30/12 2015 Goal Estimate (1) Leverage 62% < 55% <50% Debt/EBITDA 8.8 < 7.5 8.0 Upper end of SS NOI Growth 1–2% > 3% guidance range of 2-2.7% Total Mall Occupancy 92.6% 95.0% 95.4% Occupancy Cost 11.4% 12.5% 12.7% Sales PSF $379 > $400 $428 (1) Sales figure is from 9/30/15 10 STRONG, FLEXIBLE BALANCE SHEET Ample Liquidity Laddered maturities Minimal exposure to floating rate debt Plan to reduce leverage below 47% by end of 2018 11 SALES OUTPACING OCCUPANCY COSTS Opportunity to drive rents to correlate with sales growth (1) (1) Excludes 6 malls currently marketed for sale, Fashion Outlets of Philadelphia and Springfield Town Center 12 IMPROVING RENEWAL RENT SPREADS Improved portfolio balances leverage with tenants 13 G&A AS % OF REVENUE Reduced and scalable G&A 14 SS NOI COMPOSITION Percentage of NOI from high productivity properties increasing 15 KEY TAKEAWAYS Our future is bright Our move to QUALITY is pronounced and accelerating RESULTS achieved demonstrate our success We are experiencing a dramatic increase in new retail DEMAND REDEVELOPMENT opportunities are realizable and impactful Our balance sheet is STRONG and improving 16 SELECT ANCHOR PROFILE Reduced exposure to select anchors # of locations # of locations Tenant # of locations 2012 post-disposition post-recapture 29 16 12 29 19 19 12 3 3 17 A UNIQUE PLATFORM Realizing a Transformed PREIT Well-positioned portfolio with high-quality assets Concentration in densely populated, high barrier-to-entry markets High quality assets in two Top 10 MSAs is attracting productive retailers Opportunities to improve asset quality through remerchandising & redevelopment Significantly reduced risk profile through dispositions Mitigated anchor exposure through asset sales & replacement initiative Scale allows for intensive focus by senior management on priority endeavors Improved portfolio has provided ability to attract and retain top talent 18 SHIFTING PEER GROUP Improving position TCO MAC SPG GGP PEI CBL WPG RSE Sales per square foot $805 $630 $616 $593 $424 $371 $352 $345 TTM sales growth 1.9% 7.0% 0.5% 3.7% 9.6% 4.2% 5.6% 7.1% SS NOI (2015E) 3.1% 5.8% 4.0% 4.0% 2.5% -0.6% -1.2% 3.3% Occupancy 91.7% 95.7% 95.9% 95.2% 91.9% 90.8% 90.2% 89.5% Occupancy cost ratio 13.8% 13.2% 12.1% 13.3% 12.7% 13.0% 12.7% 11.1% Releasing spreads 15% 15% 18% 10% 6% 7% 0% 7% Average HHI $68k $63k $64k $59k $57k $54k $56k $53k Source: Green Street Advisors, Mall Sector Update, November 11, 2015 (All operating data as of September 30, 2015) 19 SHIFTING PEER GROUP Improving position TCO MAC SPG GGP PEI CBL WPG RSE G&A/Asset value(bps) 36 33 14 50 60 53 60 105 Total leverage ratio 28% 28% 30% 39% 48% 56% 51% 62% Debt/EBITDA 7.7x 6.6x 6.1x 8.9x 7.8x 7.0x 6.8x 8.8x Floating rate exposure 25% 18% 10% 19% 11% 24% 25% 26% Credit Line Maturity 2020 2018 2019 2020 2020 2020 2019 2018 Net Asset Value/Share $116 $93 $227 $35 $33 $26 $18 $17 Source: Green Street Advisors, Mall Sector Update, November 11, 2015 (All operating data as of September 30, 2015) 20 20 IMPROVED LINEUP Bringing shoppers more of what they want # of locations # of locations Tenant 2012 2015 (1) 4 13 1 3 4 8 3 4 2 11 (1) Includes executed leases not yet open 21 NEW-TO-PORTFOLIO TENANCY Since 2012, PREIT has added x new tenants to the portfolio Marquee first-to-portfolio tenants Century 21 opened their first store outside of NY Metro in Philadelphia. Legoland Discovery Center will join Plymouth Meeting in 2017; one of only 9 in the US. 22 ELEVATING PORTFOLIO QUALITY Transformed tenancy driving sales & quality of earning stream INCREASING SHARE DECREASING SHARE OUT OF TOP 20 23 KEY TAKEAWAYS Our future is bright Our move to QUALITY is pronounced and accelerating RESULTS achieved demonstrate our success We are experiencing a dramatic increase in new retail DEMAND REDEVELOPMENT opportunities are realizable and impactful Our balance sheet is STRONG and improving 24 OUR TEAM Robert McCadden Bruce Goldman Mario Ventresca, Jr. Andrew Ioannou Executive Vice President & Executive Vice President Executive Vice President Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer General Counsel & Secretary Operations Finance & Acquisitions Joseph Aristone Daniel Herman Heather Crowell Senior Vice President Senior Vice President Vice President Leasing Redevelopment Investor Relations
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Anchor Tenant in Driving Traffic in a Shopping Mall: the Case of Nakumatt Exit from Three Shopping Malls in Nairobi
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE, TECHNOLOGY & ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN AFRICA Vol. 10 No. 1 MAY 2019 ________________________________________________________________________ THE ROLE OF ANCHOR TENANT IN DRIVING TRAFFIC IN A SHOPPING MALL: THE CASE OF NAKUMATT EXIT FROM THREE SHOPPING MALLS IN NAIROBI Peter N. Kiriri United States international University – Africa Email: [email protected] Abstract The current study investigates the role of an anchor tenant in driving traffic in a shopping mall. As the main tenant in a shopping mall, anchor tenants are expected to attract both human and vehicular traffic into a shopping mall. The traffic to the anchor tenant is expected to spill over to the non- anchor tenants and thus benefit them. This expectation is sometimes not met especially when an anchor tenant is posting sub-optimal performance or when they exit the mall. The background of this study was based on the malls in Nairobi who had Nakumatt Supermarkets chain as the anchor tenant. Nakumatt was the largest chain of supermarket with about 64 outlets in East Africa at its highest level at the beginning of 2017. However, due to a myriad of management challenges, the chain was forced to close most of its stores to a low of about 5 operational stores in mid-2018. As a result, and based on the findings, this affected the shopping malls as traffic reduced by almost 50% in some malls. The effects were felt in terms of reduced business activities in the mall, reduced occupancy levels, lower rental rates and general decline of mall financial performance. It is recommended that shopping malls should consider having more than one anchor tenant to mitigate against the effects of sub-optimal performance or exit of the anchor tenant.
    [Show full text]
  • Life After Death – Coping with the Aftermath of a Co-Tenancy Failure
    Life After Death – Coping with the Aftermath of a Co-Tenancy Failure Author: Sunita Mahant, Senior Director, Legal Affairs, Ivanhoé Cambridge Inc.1 Susan. D. Rosen, Partner, Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP Co-authors: Katherine Garretto and Daniel Minuk2 Today, we hear phases such as “retail apocalypse”, “the end of the mall”, “death of brick and mortar retail”. These are just a few of the phrases that have been used to describe the current state of the retail real estate market. There is no denying that the global commercial real estate market has undergone a significant seismic shift over the past few years, and the forces that have precipitated those changes, are ongoing and continuing to change the way in which commercial retail real estate is developed, renovated, repurposed, rejuvenated and effectively leased. The aforementioned seismic shift in the retail landscape is also having a significant impact on how existing co-tenancy clauses are being interpreted, the remedies that are practically available when these clauses are violated and the manner in which new co- tenancy clauses should be written in view of the e-commerce retail revolution. Historically, a tenant of a certain size and/or brand recognition (the “Benefitting Tenant”), would require a co-tenancy clause be inserted into its lease to ensure that it would have the benefit of being located in a shopping center that had existing leases with one or more large department stores, grocery stores, supermarkets and/or named brand retailers, all with the expectation that these types of anchor or major tenants would drive traffic to the shopping centre generally, and to the Benefitting Tenant specifically.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) New Jersey
    Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) for New Jersey By ORF 467 Transportation Systems Analysis, Fall 2004/05 Princeton University Prof. Alain L. Kornhauser Nkonye Okoh Mathe Y. Mosny Shawn Woodruff Rachel M. Blair Jeffery R Jones James H. Cong Jessica Blankshain Mike Daylamani Diana M. Zakem Darius A Craton Michael R Eber Matthew M Lauria Bradford Lyman M Martin-Easton Robert M Bauer Neset I Pirkul Megan L. Bernard Eugene Gokhvat Nike Lawrence Charles Wiggins Table of Contents: Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction to Personal Rapid Transit .......................................................................................... 3 New Jersey Coastline Summary .................................................................................................... 5 Burlington County (M. Mosney '06) ..............................................................................................6 Monmouth County (M. Bernard '06 & N. Pirkul '05) .....................................................................9 Hunterdon County (S. Woodruff GS .......................................................................................... 24 Mercer County (M. Martin-Easton '05) ........................................................................................31 Union County (B. Chu '05) ...........................................................................................................37 Cape May County (M. Eber '06) …...............................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Shopping Center Research: a Review and Analysis
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Finance Faculty Research and Publications Finance, Department of 1-1-1994 The volutE ion of Shopping Center Research: A Review and Analysis Mark Eppli Marquette University, [email protected] John D. Benjamin The American University Published version. Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Winter 1994): 5-32. Publisher Link. © 1994 American Real Estate Society. Used with permission. Mark J. Eppli was affiliated with The George Washington University at the time of publication. THE JOURNAL OF REAL ESTATE RESEARCH The Evolution of Shopping Mark J. Eppli* Center Research: John D. Benjamin** A Review and Analysis Abstract. Retail research has evolved over the past sixty years. Christaller's early work on central place theory, with its simplistic combination of range and threshold has been advanced to include complex consumer shopping patterns and retailer behavior in agglomerated retail centers. Hotelling's seminal research on competition in a spatial duopoly has been realized in the form of comparison shopping in regional shopping centers. The research that has followed Christaller and HotelIing has been as wide as it has been deep, including literature in geography, economics, finance, marketing, and real estate. In combination, the many extensions of central place theory and retail agglomeration economics have clearly enhanced the understanding of both retailer and consumer behavior. In addition to these two broad areas of shopping center research, two more narrowly focused areas of research have emerged. The most recent focus in the literature has been on the positive effects large anchor tenants have on smaller non-anchor tenant sales.
    [Show full text]
  • South Shore Park Comprehensive Plan for Strategic Place Activation Report Prepared As a Collaboration Between A.W
    South Shore Park Comprehensive Plan For Strategic Place Activation Report prepared as a collaboration between A.W. Perry, Place Strategists and Vanz Consulting. The material produced herein has been compiled at the exclusive request of A.W. Perry as a framework for the activation of their real estate holdings in Hingham & Rockland. Any conclusions presented reflect the research and opinions of A.W. Perry, Place Strategists and Vanz Consulting. These materials do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Towns of Hingham or Rockland. 15 November 2019 SOUTH SHORE PARK | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR STRATEGIC PLACE ACTIVATION 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR STRATEGIC PLACE ACTIVATION (CPSPA) FOR THE SOUTH SHORE PARK A Comprehensive Plan for Strategic Place Activation (CPSPA) for the South Shore Park The following report includes Step 1 | Deep Dive + Discovery, Step 2 | The Scientific (SSP), Hingham and Rockland, MA, is developed to meet the market demand and Research Plan, Steps 3 | Programmatic Plan, and Step 4 | Place Activation Guidelines. opportunities, providing the required spatial environments for a more seamless and Steps 1 and 2 focus on analyzing the existing site conditions, and the initial proposed resilient development phasing. conceptual master plan design. These steps aim to provide the analytical framework for Steps 3 and 4 that focus on proposing a programmatic development scheme for A bottom up approach is adopted to ensure the link between a large-scale the overall master plan and two sets of guidelines to be adopted by specialists along comprehensive framework and the human scale. The focus of the CPSPA is to the development process.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 5: Thinkfang
    Frank Edward Nora Thinkfang THINKFANG by Frank Edward Nora The First Edition was published in 2003 and was called Duskaway Parking . This Second Edition is being published on August 12, 2009 and was renamed Thinkfang . Published by Frank Edward Nora New Jersey, USA onsug.com • [email protected] Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ INTRODUCTION (FROM THE FIRST EDITION) Duskaway Parking is composed of 1,103 little numbered poems called “Superiors”. I wrote these over the course of 11 years, from late February 1992 to late February 2003. The Superiors originally appeared in my weekly ezine, “OsoaWeek”, which I published on my website. The Superiors began as poetry, but over time began to include other themes. Some of them are brief essays. Others are like diary entries. And some are like little science fiction stories. They are full of beauty and ugliness, focus and blur, just like life. The best of them still amaze me, and the worst make me cringe and shake my head. But all of them are here, in this book, in their original form. One aspect of Superior that has confused some people is all the made-up words and names and places. These are straight from my hyperactive creative mind, and in many instances I feel they convey ideas and images and atmospheres better than any real words. And keep in mind the science fiction aspect, with all sorts of mysterious characters, locales, and powers. And also keep in mind that there are references to real, but obscure, things as well, which does tend to muddle things a bit..
    [Show full text]
  • Store # Phone Number Store Shopping Center/Mall Address City ST Zip District Number 318 (907) 522-1254 Gamestop Dimond Center 80
    Store # Phone Number Store Shopping Center/Mall Address City ST Zip District Number 318 (907) 522-1254 GameStop Dimond Center 800 East Dimond Boulevard #3-118 Anchorage AK 99515 665 1703 (907) 272-7341 GameStop Anchorage 5th Ave. Mall 320 W. 5th Ave, Suite 172 Anchorage AK 99501 665 6139 (907) 332-0000 GameStop Tikahtnu Commons 11118 N. Muldoon Rd. ste. 165 Anchorage AK 99504 665 6803 (907) 868-1688 GameStop Elmendorf AFB 5800 Westover Dr. Elmendorf AK 99506 75 1833 (907) 474-4550 GameStop Bentley Mall 32 College Rd. Fairbanks AK 99701 665 3219 (907) 456-5700 GameStop & Movies, Too Fairbanks Center 419 Merhar Avenue Suite A Fairbanks AK 99701 665 6140 (907) 357-5775 GameStop Cottonwood Creek Place 1867 E. George Parks Hwy Wasilla AK 99654 665 5601 (205) 621-3131 GameStop Colonial Promenade Alabaster 300 Colonial Prom Pkwy, #3100 Alabaster AL 35007 701 3915 (256) 233-3167 GameStop French Farm Pavillions 229 French Farm Blvd. Unit M Athens AL 35611 705 2989 (256) 538-2397 GameStop Attalia Plaza 977 Gilbert Ferry Rd. SE Attalla AL 35954 705 4115 (334) 887-0333 GameStop Colonial University Village 1627-28a Opelika Rd Auburn AL 36830 707 3917 (205) 425-4985 GameStop Colonial Promenade Tannehill 4933 Promenade Parkway, Suite 147 Bessemer AL 35022 701 1595 (205) 661-6010 GameStop Trussville S/C 5964 Chalkville Mountain Rd Birmingham AL 35235 700 3431 (205) 836-4717 GameStop Roebuck Center 9256 Parkway East, Suite C Birmingham AL 35206 700 3534 (205) 788-4035 GameStop & Movies, Too Five Pointes West S/C 2239 Bessemer Rd., Suite 14 Birmingham AL 35208 700 3693 (205) 957-2600 GameStop The Shops at Eastwood 1632 Montclair Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Has the Retail Apocalypse Hit the DC Area?
    POLICY BRIEF Has the Retail Apocalypse Hit the DC Area? Leah Brooks, Urbashee Paul and Rachel Shank APRIL 2018 POLICY BRIEF APRIL 2018 | LEAH BROOKS, URBASHEE PAUL AND RACHEL SHANK1 In 1977, the White Flint Mall opened to great acclaim as Maryland’s premier mall, complete with glass elevators, glamorous anchor stores, and an exciting eatery. Now, more than four decades later, White Flint Mall is situated in a sea of empty parking lots. Except for anchor tenant Lord and Taylor, with which the mall owner is in protracted litigation, the mall sits empty. About a decade before White Flint launched, Northern Virginia’s Tysons Corner Center opened, also to acclaim. Tyson’s Corner has seen continued success,2 welcoming Apple’s flagship store in 2001,3 and Spanx’s first brick and mortar store in 2012.4 The promised increase in walkability ushered in by the Silver Line expansion has heralded opportunity for new residential and commercial development.5 To what extent is this divergence due to e-commerce? The Rise of E-commerce Indeed, there is substantial evidence that brick-and-mortar retail is suffering. CNN Money10 reports that 2017 marked E-commerce dates to 1994, when the New York Times the highest number of retail store closure announcements in reported that Philadelphia’s Phil Brandenberger used his history. Within the past year, once-prominent malls in computer to purchase a Sting album. In the following year, New Jersey and Pennsylvania have closed almost 200 Amazon sold its first book, and Pierre Omidyar founded stores. And the wave seems unlikely to be over: Toys R Us Ebay.6 has recently declared bankruptcy, while long-time anchor tenants Sears, Kmart, J.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust
    Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust Supplemental Financial and Operating Information Quarter Ended December 31, 2008 www.preit.com NYSE common shares (PEI) Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust Supplemental Financial and Operating Information December 31, 2008 Table of Contents Introduction Company Information 1 Press Release Announcements 2 Market Capitalization and Capital Resources 3 Operating Results Income Statement-Proportionate Consolidation Method - Three Months Ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 4 Income Statement-Proportionate Consolidation Method - Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 5 Net Operating Income - Three Months Ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 6 Net Operating Income - Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 7 Computation of Earnings per Share 8 Funds From Operations and Funds Available for Distribution 9 Operating Statistics Leasing Activity Summary 10 Summarized Rent Per Square Foot and Occupancy Percentages 11 Mall Sales and Rent Per Square Foot 12 Mall Occupancy - Owned GLA 13 Strip and Power Center Rent Per Square Foot and Occupancy Percentages 14 Top Twenty Tenants 15 Lease Expirations 16 Gross Leasable Area Summary 17 Property Information 18 Vacant Anchor Summary 21 Balance Sheet Balance Sheet - Proportionate Consolidation Method 22 Balance Sheet - Property Type 23 Investment in Real Estate 24 Property Redevelopment and Repositioning Summary 26 Development Property Summary 27 Capital Expenditures 28 Debt Analysis 29 Debt Schedule 30 Shareholder Information 31 Definitions 32 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Quarterly Supplemental Financial and Operating Information contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
    [Show full text]
  • Macarthur Center Tenant Design & Construction Criteria Property Specific Requirements Table of Contents
    MACARTHUR CENTER TENANT DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROPERTY SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROPERTY INTRODUCTION.......................................3 3.0 ARCHITECTURE AND FINISHES (CONTINUED)....21 1.1 Base Building Information 3.2 Food Court Tenant Requirements 1.2 Contact Information • Interiors 1.3 Vicinity Map •Ceiling Work 1.4 Site Plan • Floor Finishes 3.3 Interior Storefront Signage 2.0 ARCHITECTURAL LEASE PLANS..............................7 • Storefront Signage (Retail Tenants) 2.1 Lease Plan - Level 1 • Storefront Signage (Food Court Tenants) 2.2 Lease Plan - Level 2 3.4 Interior Blade Sign (Retail Tenants) 2.3 Lease Plan - Level 3 3.5 Exterior Storefront Signage, Canopy and Awnings 2.4 Food Court Location Plan 2.5 Food Court Plan 4.0 ENGINEERING GUIDELINES.......................................24 • East 4.1 HVAC Criteria (All Tenants) • West 4.2 HVAC Criteria (Food Court, Restaurant & Odor Tenants) 2.6 Blade Sign Justification Plan 4.3 Electrical Criteria • Level One 4.4 Plumbing Requirements • Level Two 4.5 Life Safety • Level Three 3.0 ARCHITECTURE AND FINISHES................................18 3.1 Interiors • Walls and Partitions • Toilet Room Requirements • Floor Finishes • Ceiling Work • Rubbish Storage Rooms • Exit/Access/Doors and Corridors • Floor Construction NOTE: • Design Loads This document is a supplement to Starwood Retail Partners Global Requirements Criteria and should be used in conjunction with that manual. MacArthur Center Tenant Design & Construction Criteria | 06.07.19 2 1.0 PROPERTY INTRODUCTION 1.0 PROPERTY INTRODUCTION 1.1 BASE BUILDING INFORMATION The 1,000,000-square-foot structure is adjacent to the General Douglas CONSTRUCTION TYPE: MacArthur Memorial. It is anchored by Nordstrom and Dillard’s department Existing Mall Building: Type 2C Fully Sprinkled stores, with space for a third major anchor Tenant.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust ®
    Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust ® Supplemental Financial and Operating Information Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 www.preit.com NYSE: PEI Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust Supplemental Financial and Operating Information March 31, 2011 Table of Contents Introduction Company Information 1 Press Release Announcements 2 Market Capitalization and Capital Resources 3 Operating Results Statement of Operations - Proportionate Consolidation Method - Quarters Ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 4 Net Operating Income - Quarters Ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 5 Computation of Earnings Per Share 6 Funds From Operations and Funds Available for Distribution - Quarters Ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 7 Operating Statistics Leasing Activity Summary 8 Summarized Rent Per Square Foot and Occupancy Percentages 9 Mall Sales and Rent Per Square Foot 10 Enclosed Mall Occupancy - Owned GLA 11 Strip and Power Center Rent Per Square Foot and Occupancy Percentages 12 Top Twenty Tenants 13 Lease Expirations 14 Gross Leasable Area Occupancy Summary 15 Property Information 16 Balance Sheet Balance Sheet - Proportionate Consolidation Method 19 Balance Sheet - Property Type 20 Investment in Real Estate 21 Capital Expenditures 23 Debt Analysis 24 Debt Schedule 25 Selected Debt Ratios 26 Shareholder Information 27 Definitions 28 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Quarterly Supplemental and Operating Information contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans, strategies, anticipated events, trends and other matters that are not historical facts.
    [Show full text]
  • Limerick Township, Pennsylvania
    LIMERICK TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA PROPERTY OVERVIEW PHILADELPHIA PREMIUM OUTLETS® LIMERICK TOWNSHIP, PA Easton MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREAS SELECT TENANTS Allentown Delaware 78 Water Gap Philadelphia: 35 miles southeast Neiman Marcus Last Call, adidas, Ann Taylor Factory Store, ASICS, Banana Republic Factory Store, Brooks Brothers Factory Store, Calvin Klein Company 183 Store, Coach Factory Store, Cole Haan Outlet, Diesel, DKNY Company Store, RETAIL Reading 476 Forever 21, Gap Outlet, GUESS Factory Store, J.Crew Factory, kate spade 422 GLA (sq. ft.) 549,000; 150 stores new york, Michael Kors Outlet, The North Face, Nike Factory Store, Polo 76 95 222 Sanatoga 276 Ralph Lauren Factory Store, Puma, Restoration Hardware, Sperry Top-Sider, Exit Theory Outlet, Tommy Hilfiger Company Store, True Religion, Under Armour, Lancaster OPENING DATE UGG®, Vera Bradley Philadelphia Opened November 2007 PA Expanded April 2008 TOURISM / TRAFFIC PHILADELPHIA PREMIUM OUTLETS NJ Philadelphia Premium Outlets is located 35 miles northwest of center LIMERICK, PA RADIUS POPULATION city Philadelphia on the border of Montgomery and Chester counties 15 miles: 655,546 offering easy access to all major arteries in the heart of the tri-county area. 30 miles: 4,365,973 Philadelphia is the second largest city on the East Coast and ranks fifth in the 45 miles: 7,534,240 nation with a metro population of 5.8 million. The Pennsylvania Convention Center is the second largest convention center in the Northeast with 1.3 million square feet of floor space. In 2014, Philadelphia International Airport AVERAGE HH INCOME processed over 30.7 million passengers. Limerick Township is a highly 30 miles: $83,437 populated area along the 422 Expressway and rapidly growing.
    [Show full text]