4Th Quarter 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4Th Quarter 2019 Quarterly Supplemental 4th Quarter 2019 Aventura Shopping Center Brick Walk Aventura, FL Fairfield, CT Mellody Farm Broadway Market The Village at Riverstone Chicago, IL Seattle, WA Dallas, TX Investor Relations [email protected] One Independent Drive, Suite 114 Jacksonville, FL 32202 904 598 7000 RegencyCenters.com Table of Contents December 31, 2019 Disclosures ............................................................................................................................................... i Earnings Press Release ............................................................................................................................. iv Summary Information: Summary Financial Information .................................................................................................................1 Summary Real Estate Information ..............................................................................................................2 Financial Information: Consolidated Balance Sheets .....................................................................................................................3 Consolidated Statements of Operations ......................................................................................................4 Supplemental Details of Operations (Consolidated Only) ..............................................................................5 Supplemental Details of Assets and Liabilities (Real Estate Partnerships Only) ..............................................6 Supplemental Details of Operations (Real Estate Partnerships Only) .............................................................7 Supplemental Details of Same Property NOI (Pro-Rata) ...............................................................................8 Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Additional Disclosures .................................................9 Summary of Consolidated Debt ................................................................................................................ 11 Summary of Consolidated Debt Detail ...................................................................................................... 12 Summary of Unsecured Debt Covenants and Leverage Ratios .................................................................... 13 Summary of Unconsolidated Debt ............................................................................................................ 14 Unconsolidated Investments .................................................................................................................... 15 Investment Activity: Property Transactions ............................................................................................................................. 16 Summary of Developments and Redevelopments ..................................................................................... 17 Major Redevelopment Pipeline ................................................................................................................. 20 Real Estate Information: Leasing Statistics .................................................................................................................................... 21 Average Base Rent by CBSA .................................................................................................................... 22 Significant Tenant Rents .......................................................................................................................... 23 Tenant Lease Expirations......................................................................................................................... 24 Portfolio Summary Report by State .......................................................................................................... 25 Components of NAV and Forward-Looking Information: Components of NAV ................................................................................................................................ 34 Earnings Guidance .................................................................................................................................. 35 Reconciliation of Net Income to NAREIT FFO ............................................................................................ 36 Glossary of Terms ................................................................................................................................... 37 Disclosures December 31, 2019 Accounting and Disclosure Changes FASB Accounting Standards Codification – Topic 842 (Leases) (“Leases Standard”) Effective January 1, 2019, Regency adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 842, Leases, under the modified retrospective transition approach allowing for initial application at the date of adoption. The Company also elected to reclassify the prior period amounts to conform to the current year presentation. The financial statements have been impacted as follows: Consolidated Statements of Operations • All lease income earned pursuant to tenant leases in 2019, and as reclassified for 2018, which includes but is not limited to Base rent, Recoveries from tenants and Percentage rent, is reflected in Lease income. • Lease income is presented net of revenues deemed uncollectible for the current period. Prior period presentation of this line item was included in Operating expenses as Provision for doubtful accounts. • Real estate revenues earned not specific to tenant leases in 2019 have been reclassified from Recoveries from tenants and other income to Other property income. • Indirect internal leasing and legal costs associated with the execution of lease agreements that were previously capitalized are expensed in General and administrative in Operating expenses in the current period. Consolidated Balance Sheets • Addition of Lease liabilities and corresponding Right of use assets, net of or including the opening balance for straight line rent and above/below market intangibles, for its ground and office leases where Regency is the lessee. NAREIT Funds from Operations Regency prospectively adopted the NAREIT FFO White Paper – 2018 Restatement (“2018 FFO Whitepaper”), and elected the option of excluding gains on the sale and impairments of land from NAREIT FFO, which are considered incidental to the Company’s main business. Prior period amounts were not restated to conform to the current year presentation of NAREIT FFO, and therefore include gains on sales and impairments of land. Non-GAAP Disclosures We use certain non-GAAP performance measures, in addition to the required GAAP presentations, as we believe these measures improve the understanding of the Company's operational results. We provide pro- rata financial information because we believe it assists investors and analysts in estimating our economic interest in our consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships, when read in conjunction with the Company’s reported results under GAAP. We believe presenting our pro-rata share of assets, liabilities, and operating results, along with other non-GAAP measures, makes comparisons of other REITs' operating results to the Company's more meaningful. We continually evaluate the usefulness, relevance, limitations, and calculation of our reported non-GAAP performance measures to determine how best to provide relevant information to the public, and thus such reported measures could change. The pro-rata information provided is not, and is not intended to be, presented in accordance with GAAP. The pro-rata supplemental details of assets and liabilities and supplemental details of operations reflect our proportionate economic ownership of the assets, liabilities and operating results of the properties in our portfolio. i Disclosures December 31, 2019 • The items labeled as "Consolidated" are prepared on a basis consistent with the Company's consolidated financial statements as filed with the SEC on the most recent Form 10-Q or 10-K, as applicable. • The columns labeled "Share of JVs" represent our ownership interest in our unconsolidated (equity method) investments in real estate partnerships, and was derived on a partnership by partnership basis by applying to each financial statement line item our ownership percentage interest used to arrive at our share of investments in real estate partnerships and equity in income or loss of investments in real estate partnerships during the period when applying the equity method of accounting to each of our unconsolidated partnerships. • A similar calculation was performed for the amounts in columns labeled ''Noncontrolling Interests”, which represent the limited partners’ interests in consolidated partnerships attributable to each financial statement line item. We do not control the unconsolidated partnerships, and the presentations of the assets and liabilities and revenues and expenses do not necessarily represent our legal claim to such items. The partners are entitled to profit or loss allocations and distributions of cash flows according to the operating agreements, which generally provide for such allocations according to their invested capital. Our share of invested capital establishes the ownership interest we use to prepare our pro-rata share. The presentation of pro-rata financial information has limitations as an analytical tool. Some of these limitations include, but are not limited to the following: • The amounts shown on the individual line items were derived by applying our overall economic ownership
Recommended publications
  • Transit Information Rockridge Station Oakland
    B I R C H C T Transit N Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Claremont Middle Stops OAK GROVE AVE K Rockridge L School San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective May 26, 2018 A Transit (BART) rail service connects W 79 Drop-off Station the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices include a 50¢ sur- 51B Drop-off 79 Map Key Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. charge per trip for using magnetic E A quick reference guide to service hours from this stripe tickets. Riders using (Leave bus here to Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and T transfer to 51A) other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. Clipper® can avoid this surcharge. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and U Oakland Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from Rockridge Station From Rockridge to: N (stations listed in alphabetical order) 3-Minute Walk 500ft/150m Weekday Saturday Sunday I M I L E S A V E Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip Radius First Last First Last First Last Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 2.50 5.00 M H I G H W AY 2 4 511 Real-Time Departures Antioch 5:48a 12:49a 6:19a 12:49a 8:29a 12:49a 16th St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Anchor Tenant in Driving Traffic in a Shopping Mall: the Case of Nakumatt Exit from Three Shopping Malls in Nairobi
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE, TECHNOLOGY & ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN AFRICA Vol. 10 No. 1 MAY 2019 ________________________________________________________________________ THE ROLE OF ANCHOR TENANT IN DRIVING TRAFFIC IN A SHOPPING MALL: THE CASE OF NAKUMATT EXIT FROM THREE SHOPPING MALLS IN NAIROBI Peter N. Kiriri United States international University – Africa Email: [email protected] Abstract The current study investigates the role of an anchor tenant in driving traffic in a shopping mall. As the main tenant in a shopping mall, anchor tenants are expected to attract both human and vehicular traffic into a shopping mall. The traffic to the anchor tenant is expected to spill over to the non- anchor tenants and thus benefit them. This expectation is sometimes not met especially when an anchor tenant is posting sub-optimal performance or when they exit the mall. The background of this study was based on the malls in Nairobi who had Nakumatt Supermarkets chain as the anchor tenant. Nakumatt was the largest chain of supermarket with about 64 outlets in East Africa at its highest level at the beginning of 2017. However, due to a myriad of management challenges, the chain was forced to close most of its stores to a low of about 5 operational stores in mid-2018. As a result, and based on the findings, this affected the shopping malls as traffic reduced by almost 50% in some malls. The effects were felt in terms of reduced business activities in the mall, reduced occupancy levels, lower rental rates and general decline of mall financial performance. It is recommended that shopping malls should consider having more than one anchor tenant to mitigate against the effects of sub-optimal performance or exit of the anchor tenant.
    [Show full text]
  • Life After Death – Coping with the Aftermath of a Co-Tenancy Failure
    Life After Death – Coping with the Aftermath of a Co-Tenancy Failure Author: Sunita Mahant, Senior Director, Legal Affairs, Ivanhoé Cambridge Inc.1 Susan. D. Rosen, Partner, Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP Co-authors: Katherine Garretto and Daniel Minuk2 Today, we hear phases such as “retail apocalypse”, “the end of the mall”, “death of brick and mortar retail”. These are just a few of the phrases that have been used to describe the current state of the retail real estate market. There is no denying that the global commercial real estate market has undergone a significant seismic shift over the past few years, and the forces that have precipitated those changes, are ongoing and continuing to change the way in which commercial retail real estate is developed, renovated, repurposed, rejuvenated and effectively leased. The aforementioned seismic shift in the retail landscape is also having a significant impact on how existing co-tenancy clauses are being interpreted, the remedies that are practically available when these clauses are violated and the manner in which new co- tenancy clauses should be written in view of the e-commerce retail revolution. Historically, a tenant of a certain size and/or brand recognition (the “Benefitting Tenant”), would require a co-tenancy clause be inserted into its lease to ensure that it would have the benefit of being located in a shopping center that had existing leases with one or more large department stores, grocery stores, supermarkets and/or named brand retailers, all with the expectation that these types of anchor or major tenants would drive traffic to the shopping centre generally, and to the Benefitting Tenant specifically.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Shopping Center Research: a Review and Analysis
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Finance Faculty Research and Publications Finance, Department of 1-1-1994 The volutE ion of Shopping Center Research: A Review and Analysis Mark Eppli Marquette University, [email protected] John D. Benjamin The American University Published version. Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Winter 1994): 5-32. Publisher Link. © 1994 American Real Estate Society. Used with permission. Mark J. Eppli was affiliated with The George Washington University at the time of publication. THE JOURNAL OF REAL ESTATE RESEARCH The Evolution of Shopping Mark J. Eppli* Center Research: John D. Benjamin** A Review and Analysis Abstract. Retail research has evolved over the past sixty years. Christaller's early work on central place theory, with its simplistic combination of range and threshold has been advanced to include complex consumer shopping patterns and retailer behavior in agglomerated retail centers. Hotelling's seminal research on competition in a spatial duopoly has been realized in the form of comparison shopping in regional shopping centers. The research that has followed Christaller and HotelIing has been as wide as it has been deep, including literature in geography, economics, finance, marketing, and real estate. In combination, the many extensions of central place theory and retail agglomeration economics have clearly enhanced the understanding of both retailer and consumer behavior. In addition to these two broad areas of shopping center research, two more narrowly focused areas of research have emerged. The most recent focus in the literature has been on the positive effects large anchor tenants have on smaller non-anchor tenant sales.
    [Show full text]
  • South Shore Park Comprehensive Plan for Strategic Place Activation Report Prepared As a Collaboration Between A.W
    South Shore Park Comprehensive Plan For Strategic Place Activation Report prepared as a collaboration between A.W. Perry, Place Strategists and Vanz Consulting. The material produced herein has been compiled at the exclusive request of A.W. Perry as a framework for the activation of their real estate holdings in Hingham & Rockland. Any conclusions presented reflect the research and opinions of A.W. Perry, Place Strategists and Vanz Consulting. These materials do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Towns of Hingham or Rockland. 15 November 2019 SOUTH SHORE PARK | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR STRATEGIC PLACE ACTIVATION 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR STRATEGIC PLACE ACTIVATION (CPSPA) FOR THE SOUTH SHORE PARK A Comprehensive Plan for Strategic Place Activation (CPSPA) for the South Shore Park The following report includes Step 1 | Deep Dive + Discovery, Step 2 | The Scientific (SSP), Hingham and Rockland, MA, is developed to meet the market demand and Research Plan, Steps 3 | Programmatic Plan, and Step 4 | Place Activation Guidelines. opportunities, providing the required spatial environments for a more seamless and Steps 1 and 2 focus on analyzing the existing site conditions, and the initial proposed resilient development phasing. conceptual master plan design. These steps aim to provide the analytical framework for Steps 3 and 4 that focus on proposing a programmatic development scheme for A bottom up approach is adopted to ensure the link between a large-scale the overall master plan and two sets of guidelines to be adopted by specialists along comprehensive framework and the human scale. The focus of the CPSPA is to the development process.
    [Show full text]
  • Has the Retail Apocalypse Hit the DC Area?
    POLICY BRIEF Has the Retail Apocalypse Hit the DC Area? Leah Brooks, Urbashee Paul and Rachel Shank APRIL 2018 POLICY BRIEF APRIL 2018 | LEAH BROOKS, URBASHEE PAUL AND RACHEL SHANK1 In 1977, the White Flint Mall opened to great acclaim as Maryland’s premier mall, complete with glass elevators, glamorous anchor stores, and an exciting eatery. Now, more than four decades later, White Flint Mall is situated in a sea of empty parking lots. Except for anchor tenant Lord and Taylor, with which the mall owner is in protracted litigation, the mall sits empty. About a decade before White Flint launched, Northern Virginia’s Tysons Corner Center opened, also to acclaim. Tyson’s Corner has seen continued success,2 welcoming Apple’s flagship store in 2001,3 and Spanx’s first brick and mortar store in 2012.4 The promised increase in walkability ushered in by the Silver Line expansion has heralded opportunity for new residential and commercial development.5 To what extent is this divergence due to e-commerce? The Rise of E-commerce Indeed, there is substantial evidence that brick-and-mortar retail is suffering. CNN Money10 reports that 2017 marked E-commerce dates to 1994, when the New York Times the highest number of retail store closure announcements in reported that Philadelphia’s Phil Brandenberger used his history. Within the past year, once-prominent malls in computer to purchase a Sting album. In the following year, New Jersey and Pennsylvania have closed almost 200 Amazon sold its first book, and Pierre Omidyar founded stores. And the wave seems unlikely to be over: Toys R Us Ebay.6 has recently declared bankruptcy, while long-time anchor tenants Sears, Kmart, J.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Macarthur Center Tenant Design & Construction Criteria Property Specific Requirements Table of Contents
    MACARTHUR CENTER TENANT DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PROPERTY SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROPERTY INTRODUCTION.......................................3 3.0 ARCHITECTURE AND FINISHES (CONTINUED)....21 1.1 Base Building Information 3.2 Food Court Tenant Requirements 1.2 Contact Information • Interiors 1.3 Vicinity Map •Ceiling Work 1.4 Site Plan • Floor Finishes 3.3 Interior Storefront Signage 2.0 ARCHITECTURAL LEASE PLANS..............................7 • Storefront Signage (Retail Tenants) 2.1 Lease Plan - Level 1 • Storefront Signage (Food Court Tenants) 2.2 Lease Plan - Level 2 3.4 Interior Blade Sign (Retail Tenants) 2.3 Lease Plan - Level 3 3.5 Exterior Storefront Signage, Canopy and Awnings 2.4 Food Court Location Plan 2.5 Food Court Plan 4.0 ENGINEERING GUIDELINES.......................................24 • East 4.1 HVAC Criteria (All Tenants) • West 4.2 HVAC Criteria (Food Court, Restaurant & Odor Tenants) 2.6 Blade Sign Justification Plan 4.3 Electrical Criteria • Level One 4.4 Plumbing Requirements • Level Two 4.5 Life Safety • Level Three 3.0 ARCHITECTURE AND FINISHES................................18 3.1 Interiors • Walls and Partitions • Toilet Room Requirements • Floor Finishes • Ceiling Work • Rubbish Storage Rooms • Exit/Access/Doors and Corridors • Floor Construction NOTE: • Design Loads This document is a supplement to Starwood Retail Partners Global Requirements Criteria and should be used in conjunction with that manual. MacArthur Center Tenant Design & Construction Criteria | 06.07.19 2 1.0 PROPERTY INTRODUCTION 1.0 PROPERTY INTRODUCTION 1.1 BASE BUILDING INFORMATION The 1,000,000-square-foot structure is adjacent to the General Douglas CONSTRUCTION TYPE: MacArthur Memorial. It is anchored by Nordstrom and Dillard’s department Existing Mall Building: Type 2C Fully Sprinkled stores, with space for a third major anchor Tenant.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniquely Oakland San Francisco Business Times
    SPECIAL ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT SEPTEMBER 6, 2019 Uniquely OaklandOpportunities shine in California’s most inclusive and innovative city 2 ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT UNIQUELY OAKLAND SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES Welcome to Mandela Station MANDELA STATION @WEST OAKLAND BART A Culture-Rich Transit Oriented Development 7TH ST T2 T1 Located at the 5.5-acre West Oakland Bart Station Site T3 T4 5TH ST A Centrally Located 750 Residential Units Opportunity Zone Project (approx. 240 units below market-rate) 500,000 sq.ft. of Class A oce space Only 7 minutes from Downtown San Francisco (via BART) 75,000 sq.ft. of quality retail Over 400 parking stalls Only 4 minutes to Downtown PROJ. # 168-153 WO BART Oakland (via BART) DATE: April 30, 2019 SHEET: A Regional Community...Connected JRDV ARCHITECTS INC. COPYRIGHT C 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. We’re on the Edge - and taking transit oriented living to the next level. www.westoaklandstation.com #WOSTATION [email protected] 中国港湾工程有限 公司 Strategic Urban Development Alliance, LLC China Harbour Engineering Company Ltd. suda SEPTEMBER 6, 2019 UNIQUELY OAKLAND ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT 3 ‹ A LETTER FROM THE MAYOR OF OAKLAND › Uniquely Oakland Everyone belongs in the world’s best city for smart businesses, large or small elcome to Oakland, Calif., the best place ment dollars are pouring in, driving construction on the planet to pursue prosperity. on 240,000 square feet of new retail space and W If that seems like exaggeration, 945,000 square feet of new office space with consider this: Oakland is ideally located at the openings slated for 2019, 2020 and 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, Et Al
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. MOAC MALL HOLDINGS LLC, Appellant, No. 19 Civ. 09140 (CM) -against- TRANSFORM HOLDCO LLC and SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, et al. Appellees. DECISION ON APPEAL McMahon, C.J.: Sears (f/k/a Sears, Roebuck and Co., collectively with Sears Holdings Corporation and its affiliated debtors, the “Debtors”), the iconic American retailer, is once again bankrupt. The instant appeal is taken from an order issued by The Hon. Robert Drain, U.S.B.J., approving the assignment and assumption of Sears’ lease at the equally iconic (if considerably newer) Minneapolis shopping mall cum amusement and entertainment venue known as the Mall of America. The approved assignor is not a business establishment – not a retail store, not a restaurant, not a hotel, not an amusement venue, not a waterpark (reputed to be the latest addition to the Mall of America’s ever-lengthening list of very un-shopping-mall-like tenants). Rather, it is an entity known as Transform Leaseco LLC (“Transform Leaseco”), an affiliate and wholly owned 1 subsidiary of Transform Holdco LLC (collectively, “Transform”). Transform was formed and is headed by Sears’ final CEO, Eddie Lampert, and several other former Sears executives. Transform’s goal is to gain control of substantially all of Sears’ assets, including Sears’ many real estate holdings, through Sears’ bankruptcy proceedings. In this it has been largely successful; Transform provisionally acquired 660 Sears leases in a sale order entered by the Bankruptcy Court, 659 of which the court has approved for assignment to Transform.
    [Show full text]
  • Busroutes-Oakland.Pdf
    T.) S 59 H CAMRON- abcdeabcdeabcdeabcdeabcdeabcdeabcdeabcdeabcdeabcdeabcdeabcde abcde PARAMOUNT 0T SCOTTISH (2 19TH ST. BART 12TH ST. BART RITE STANFORD LAKE MERRITT BART THEATRE Y. HOUSE W TEMPLE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Y 11 12 15 51 11 12 19 40 40L 11 59 62 88 a RD. a LE RK BE REDWO . M OD Upper . L 19TH ST. 59 72 72R 43 51 63 72 72R T . AD BART ST San Leandro ISO TELEGRAPH A 72M N NL 72M 72M 82 82 19TH ST. BART 12TH ST. BART LAKE MERRITT BART 15 N Reservoir L RD. RD. 40 OAK 11 12 15 51 11 12 19 40 40 11 59 62 88 . 15 82L 88 N 15 b b T. W REDWOOD 40 S E 72 ALICE R B 59 SUPERIOR 59 72 72 43 51 63 72 72R L V. F S MAIN 15 . WILLIAMS ST H COURT R R T LIBRARY H D A E A COUNTY RT H 72 N R RR O T ADMIN. N 72M N NL 72M 72M 82 19 43 K 82 R L YWCA IS MALONGA JAC WEST DR.KAISER I . N T ON CASQUELOURD . CONV. CENTER FOR T EASTMONT TRANSIT CENTER COLISEUM BART . 72 KSON S CTR. 82L 88 N BROADWAY AC TRANSIT THE ARTS ST M HEADQUARTERS 14 c A A c 11 . 40 40L 43 50 45 50 56 98 H S 88 FRUITVALE BART 46 18TH ST 5T 13 62 ANTHONY CHABOT H 1 . OAKLAND 7T 11 SAN PABLO AV.1 12 MUSEUM 19 47 48 50 57 N NL NX3 PO FALLON ST PO T .
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Anchors Stores in the Perform of Shopping Centers
    The Impact of Anchors Stores in the Perform of Shopping Centers João Chang Junior ([email protected]) – Centro Universitário da FEI Claudia Aparecida Mattos – Centro Universitário da FEI Marcos Palaia Cassas – Centro Universitário da FEI Abstract This work determines the impact of anchor stores in the performance and results of eight Brazilian malls between 2007 and 2009 as well as its influence on the results of satellite stores, through panel data. The work demonstrates that satellite stores rental price is influenced by anchor stores rental price. Keywords: Shopping Centers’ Performance, Anchor Stores, Panel Data Introduction According to ABRASCE - Brazilian Association of Shopping Centers, are considered shopping centers the projects with a total area available for installation of stores, more than 5 thousand square meters. This area is called GLA - Gross leasable area. They consist of several business units, with single, centralized administration and practicing fixed and percentage rent on sales. These developments have anchor stores and parking spaces compatible with the laws of the region where it is installed. There are many definitions for anchor stores. According to ABRASCE are stores with more than 1,000 m² and attracting flow of people to the mall. Anchors are retail operations of the department stores, hypermarkets, electronics and more. It promotes, through the reputation of his name, buyers flow which are attracted to visit the site and therefore sales of other stores and the profits of the enterprise increase by their presence. Planned malls have one or more anchors and several specialty retail stores in each product category, called satellite stores.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 ECONOMIC IMPACT of SHOPPING CENTERS International Council of Shopping Centers 1 CONTENTS
    2013 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF SHOPPING CENTERS International Council of Shopping Centers 1 CONTENTS 3 ICSC Values 4 Marketplace Fairness 4 Did You Know? 4 Annual Performance 5 A History of Shopping Centers 6 National Impact 8 Non-Anchor Tenant Sales 8 Shopping Center Definitions 9 Geographic Distribution of GLA 10 U.S. Country Fact Sheet 2 ICSC VALUES EDUCATION RESEARCH Where we’ve been Where we’ve been Recent special classes at the University of Shopping Centers, web Member research resources span an online library, a database based programs and the John T. Riordan schools, have benefitted of more than 9,000 industry statistics, a rich offering of learning, members by looking at redevelopment and retrofitting existing leadership and issues videos, 11 industry-leading publications, properties and opportunities to maximize retail productivity. a global shopping center directory and a wide array of special Conferences, books, sessions and ICSC events around the world studies. offer potential to assimilate knowledge, and only ICSC offers global professional certifications: CSM, CMD, CLS, CDP. Where we’re going Strategic alliances with complementary associations and Where we’re going industry research providers will bring new range and depth to Conferences such as our NOI+ Conference will educate members on our information offerings, especially for new and timely industry asset management priorities and maximizing net operating income at benchmarks. their retail properties. We’re also working with like-minded shopping center councils and associations around the globe to encourage innovative thought leadership collaboration on best practices. EARN ADVOCACY NETWORKING Where we’ve been Where we’ve been Recent efforts to champion Marketplace Fairness RECon Las Vegas draws over 30,000 attendees annually.
    [Show full text]