DOCSLIB.ORG

Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs January 4, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30588 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Summary The United States and its partner countries are gradually reducing military involvement in Afghanistan as the Afghan government and security forces assume ever greater responsibility in preparation for the end of international mission in Afghanistan by the end of 2014. Afghan forces are to assume much of the security lead nationwide by mid-2013. The number of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, which peaked at about 100,000 in June 2011, has been reduced to a “pre-surge” level of 66,000 as of September 20, 2012, and will likely continue to draw down as the transition proceeds. No U.S. decision has been announced on the rate of that drawdown, or on the size of the U.S. force that will remain in Afghanistan after 2014. U.S. military recommendations for the post-2014 force reportedly range from 6,000 to 20,000, mostly advisors and trainers but including some forces that will continue to combat Taliban forces. The drawdown and post-2014 size decisions will likely hinge on assessments of the performance of the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF), insurgent strength, and the progress of reconciliation talks with Taliban figures, resiliency. The post-2014 U.S. presence is dependent on finalization of a bilateral security agreement, currently under negotiation with the Afghan government, pursuant to a May 1, 2012, U.S.-Afghan Strategic Partnership Agreement. In keeping with that agreement, on July 7, 2012 (one day in advance of a major donors’ conference on Afghanistan in Tokyo), the United States named Afghanistan a “Major Non-NATO Ally,” further assuring Afghanistan of long-term U.S. support. The Administration view is that, no matter the U.S. and allied drawdown schedule, Afghan stability after the 2014 transition is at risk from weak and corrupt Afghan governance and insurgent safe haven in Pakistan. Among other efforts to promote effective and transparent Afghan governance, U.S. officials are pushing for substantial election reform to ensure that the next presidential election, scheduled for April 2014, will be not experience the fraud of the elections in 2009 and 2010. A potential contributor to stability would be a negotiated settlement to the conflict. Negotiations have proceeded sporadically since early 2010, but, by the end of 2012, began to evolve into a discussion of specific proposals to settle the conflict. Afghanistan’s minorities and women’s groups worry about a potential settlement, fearing it might produce compromises with the Taliban that erode human rights and ethnic power-sharing. To promote long-term growth and prevent a severe economic downturn as international donors scale back their involvement in Afghanistan, U.S. officials also hope to draw on Afghanistan’s vast mineral and agricultural resources. Several major privately funded mining, agricultural, and even energy development programs have begun or are beginning. U.S. officials also seek greater Afghanistan integration into regional trade and investment patterns. Persuading Afghanistan’s neighbors to support Afghanistan’s stability instead of their own particular interests has been a focus of U.S. policy since 2009, but with mixed success. Even if these economic efforts succeed, Afghanistan will likely remain dependent on foreign aid indefinitely. Through the end of FY2012, the United States has provided nearly $83 billion in assistance to Afghanistan since the fall of the Taliban, of which about $51 billion has been to equip and train Afghan forces. During FY2001-FY2012, the Afghan intervention has cost about $557 billion, including all costs. About $9.7 billion in economic aid and $82 billion in additional U.S. military costs are requested for FY2013. As announced in the context of the July 8, 2012, Tokyo donors’ conference, Administration economic aid requests for Afghanistan are likely to continue at current levels through at least FY2017. See CRS Report RS21922, Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance, by Kenneth Katzman. Congressional Research Service Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Contents Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 From Early History to the 19th Century ..................................................................................... 1 Early 20th Century and Cold War Era ........................................................................................ 1 Soviet Invasion and Occupation Period ..................................................................................... 2 The Seven Major “Mujahedin” Parties and Their Activities ............................................... 3 Geneva Accords (1988) and Soviet Withdrawal ........................................................................ 3 The Mujahedin Government and Rise of the Taliban ................................................................ 4 Taliban Rule (September 1996-November 2001) ...................................................................... 5 U.S. Policy Toward the Taliban During Its Rule/Bin Laden Presence ................................ 5 The “Northern Alliance” Congeals...................................................................................... 6 Policy Pre-September 11, 2001 ................................................................................................. 7 September 11 Attacks and Operation Enduring Freedom ................................................... 8 Post-Taliban Governance-Building Efforts ............................................................................... 9 U.S. and International Civilian Policy Structure ............................................................... 11 Security Policy, 2011-2014 “Transition, and Beyond” .................................................................. 13 Who Is “The Enemy”? Taliban, Haqqani, Al Qaeda, and Others ............................................ 13 Groups: The Taliban/“Quetta Shura Taliban”(QST) ......................................................... 13 Al Qaeda/Bin Laden .......................................................................................................... 14 Hikmatyar Faction ............................................................................................................. 15 Haqqani Faction ................................................................................................................ 15 Pakistani Groups ............................................................................................................... 17 Insurgent Tactics ................................................................................................................ 17 Insurgent Financing: Narcotics Trafficking and Other Methods ....................................... 18 The U.S.-Led Military Effort: 2001-2008 ............................................................................... 19 Perception of “Victory,” Followed by Setback and Deterioration..................................... 20 Obama Administration Surge .................................................................................................. 21 McChrystal Assessment and December 1, 2009, Surge Announcement ........................... 21 Progress of the Transition and Drawdown .............................................................................. 23 Tranches of Territory in Transition: ................................................................................... 23 Unwinding of the Surge Announced June 22, 2011 .......................................................... 24 Surge Implementation and Results/Current Security Assessments ................................... 24 Beyond 2014: Size of Residual Force, Strategic Partnership Agreement, and Bilateral Security Agreement .............................................................................................................. 27 Likely Size and Structure of Post-2014 Force ................................................................... 27 Strategic Partnership Agreement/Legal Status of Post-2014 Force ................................... 29 Transition Pillar: Building Afghan Forces and Establishing Rule of Law .............................. 32 Current and Post-2014 Size of the Force........................................................................... 33 Training Overview ............................................................................................................ 35 The Afghan National Army (ANA) ................................................................................... 35 Afghan Air Force ............................................................................................................... 36 Afghan National Police (ANP) ......................................................................................... 37 Rule of Law/Criminal Justice Sector................................................................................. 40 Policy Component: Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) ................................................ 41 Cooperation With Allies/Managing the 2014 Exit..................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Youth Perspectives on Peace and Security: Afghanistan • 3 Growing Emphasis on Education
    Report April 2018 Youth perspectives on peace AfghanistanLogo using and security: multiply on layers Logo drawn as seperate elements with overlaps coloured seperately Contents 1. Youth, peace and security in Afghanistan 3 1.1 Political and security context 3 1.2 Youth and politics in Afghanistan 3 1.3 Youth and the peace process in Afghanistan today 4 2. The focus group discussions 4 2.1 Context and challenges 4 2.2 Regional differences between respondents 5 3. Findings from the focus group discussions 5 3.1 Views on the current political context 5 Insecurity and local Instability 5 3.2 A lack of rule of law 6 3.3 Corruption 6 3.4 The international community and other actors 6 3.5 Challenges for youth in Afghanistan 7 A lack of political voice 7 3.6 Manipulation by local leaders 8 3.7 Challenges for female youth 8 3.8 Reflections on the peace process 9 Challenges defining peace 9 3.9 Views on peace process 9 3.10 Role of religious leaders in the peace process 9 3.11 Potential role of youth in peace process 10 4. Conclusions 10 References cited 11 This report was authored by Noah Coburn, with research support from Mohammad Munir Salamzai. Cover image: Women seeking a brighter future. © Dan Love 2 • Conciliation Resources resources and international development 1. Youth, peace and funds and contracts from the US military to security in Afghanistan enrich themselves.3 In the meantime, with fewer international troops, Afghan troops have 1.1 Political and security context struggled to hold territory against the Taliban, leading to a state of low-level but continued The past forty years of Afghan history have been violence, with no prospect on the horizon for an marked by near constant upheaval and war.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Drago Cinese E L'aquila Americana Sullo Scacchiere Asiatico
    Il drago cinese e l’aquila americana sullo scacchiere asiatico – Asia Maior 2013 Maior Asia – asiatico scacchiere sullo americana l’aquila e cinese drago Il di) cura (a Mocci N. e Torri M. Nel corso del 2013, lo scacchiere asiatico è apparso dominato a livello geopolitico da una sorta di duello a distanza fra il drago Asia Maior cinese e l’aquila americana. Il drago cinese ha continuato a raorzare Osservatorio italiano sull’Asia la propria posizione con un uso sempre più incisivo del proprio soft power. Dall’altro lato, l’aquila americana ha portato avanti la 2013 costruzione di una rete di alleanze destinata ad unire in funzione anticinese i paesi dell’Asia-Pacico. Il quadro è stato ulteriormente complicato dalla rinnovata capacità dell’Iran, sotto la leadership del neo presidente Rouhani, di reinserirsi nel gioco internazionale. Dal punto di vista economico, invece, i paesi asiatici hanno continuato a confrontarsi con le conseguenze della crisi mondiale. Da una parte vi è stata la scelta, in particolare quella della Cina, a favore di politiche Il drago cinese e economiche neoliberiste; dall’altra vi è stata la decisione in senso opposto del Giappone, che ha inaugurato una politica economica espansiva, basata su massicce iniezioni di liquidità monetaria l’aquila americana sullo nel sistema economico. Un caso a parte, inne, è rappresentato dal terzo gigante asiatico, l’India, dove alle politiche economiche neoliberiste si è aancato il varo di una politica redistributiva di dimensioni gigantesche: la legge sulla sicurezza alimentare. scacchiere asiatico Il volume, prendendo le mosse da tale quadro generale, analizza l’Asia Maior dal punto di vista sia dei rapporti inter nazionali sia delle dinamiche interne di diciannove paesi asiatici: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Cambogia, Cina (Taiwan inclusa), Corea del sud, Corea del nord, Fi lippine, Giappone, India, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, Myanmar, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, ailandia, Turkmenistan, Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Background and U.S. Policy
    Afghanistan: Background and U.S. Policy July 18, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45818 SUMMARY R45818 Afghanistan: Background and U.S. Policy July 18, 2019 Afghanistan has been a significant U.S. foreign policy concern since 2001, when the United States, in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, led a military Clayton Thomas campaign against Al Qaeda and the Taliban government that harbored and supported it. Analyst in Middle Eastern In the intervening 18 years, the United States has suffered approximately 2,400 military Affairs fatalities in Afghanistan, with the cost of military operations reaching nearly $750 billion. Congress has appropriated approximately $133 billion for reconstruction. In that time, an elected Afghan government has replaced the Taliban, and most measures of human development have improved, although Afghanistan’s future prospects remain mixed in light of the country’s ongoing violent conflict and political contention. Topics covered in this report include: Security dynamics. U.S. and Afghan forces, along with international partners, combat a Taliban insurgency that is, by many measures, in a stronger military position now than at any point since 2001. Many observers assess that a full-scale U.S. withdrawal would lead to the collapse of the Afghan government and perhaps even the reestablishment of Taliban control over most of the country. Taliban insurgents operate alongside, and in periodic competition with, an array of other armed groups, including regional affiliates of Al Qaeda (a longtime Taliban ally) and the Islamic State (a Taliban foe and increasing focus of U.S. policy). U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamid Karzai
    AFGHANISTAN Head of state and government: Hamid Karzai Thousands of civilians continued to suffer from targeted and indiscriminate attacks by armed opposition groups, with international and national security forces also responsible for civilian deaths and injuries. The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) reported more than 2,700 civilians killed and 4,805 injured, the vast majority – 81% – by armed groups. Torture and other ill-treatment were common in detention facilities across the country, despite some government efforts to reduce incidence. Violence and discrimination against women and girls remained rife both institutionally and within wider society. The government sought to introduce tougher controls on the media, prompting an outcry among media workers, who continued to be threatened and detained by the authorities and armed groups. Persistent armed conflict prompted more families to flee their homes, with 459,200 people still displaced within Afghanistan by the conflict. Many lived in informal settlements with inadequate shelter, access to water, health care, and education. Some 2.7 million refugees remained outside the country. Background In January the Taliban agreed to open a political office in Qatar allowing for direct peace negotiations; efforts faltered in March over requested exchanges of prisoners. In early November, negotiations between Pakistan and Afghanistan’s High Peace Council resulted in Pakistan releasing several detained Taliban leaders. On 17 November, the head of the High Peace Council, Salahuddin Rabbani, stated that Taliban officials who joined the peace process would receive immunity from prosecution despite the fact that some of the detained Taliban were suspected of war crimes. Women members of the High Peace Council remained sidelined from the main peace consultations.
    [Show full text]
  • Embassy of the United States of America Research Unit Difusión
    Embassy of the United States of America Research Unit Difusión selectiva de documentos electrónicos sobre seguridad y defensa en Estados Unidos 11 de abril de 2016 U.S. Statement at the Geneva Conference on Preventing Violent Extremism: The Way Forward Remarks by Sarah Sewall, Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights April 8, 2016 “Ten years ago, when UN Member States endorsed the first-ever Global Counter- Terrorism Strategy, they envisioned the need to both combat existing terrorist threats around the world and prevent those threats from emerging in the first place. Elements of both combating and preventing terrorism marble the Strategy throughout, but there is no question that until now, the UN has yet to fully balance and integrate both of these essential components.” Efforts To Combat Daesh Remarks by Secretary of State Kerry and U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Jones U.S. Department of State April 8, 2016 “So I – if we cannot defeat Daesh in all of the places we need to defeat it, if we don’t defeat it in each place individually, and that means we have to destroy it in Iraq in order to be successful in Syria, and we have to destroy it in Syria in order to be successful in Libya and in Yemen and in the various places where it has converted people to its cause. The principal reason for that conversion, folks, is success.” Joint Statement on the Third Meeting of the U.S.-Afghanistan Bilateral Commission Kabul - April 2016 U.S. Department of State April 9, 2016 On April 9 in Kabul, Afghan Foreign Minister Salahuddin Rabbani and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan-Pakistan Media Affairs Challenges and Opportunities
    Afghanistan-Pakistan Media Affairs Challenges and Opportunities Rahimullah Yusufzai December 2018 The media in Afghanistan and Pakistan has never been so large, vibrant and independent. It has attained unimaginable power and become a key player in politics and other walks of life. Media is the fourth pillar of the state and democracy in both Afghanistan and Pakistan in the true sense of the word. Earlier, it was the mainstream print and electronic media that was dominant and had assumed unprecedented importance. Now the social media is making an impact in these two neighbouring countries and often taking the lead in breaking news even if it has lesser credi- bility than the mainstream media. The media has tended to be overly patriotic and at times even aggres- sive in context of the perceived national interests of Afghanistan and Pakistan. The poor relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan affect the work of journalists. There is generally lack of awareness about each other due to the virtual absence of Afghan media in Pakistan and Pakistani media in Afghanistan. Table of Contents List of Acronyms i Foreword iii Rise in Media Power 1 Fallout on Media of Poor Afghanistan-Pakistan Relations 3 Status of Afghan Media in Pakistan 4 Status of Pakistani Media in Afghanistan 7 Reasons of Information Vacuum Between Neighbours 8 Creating Culture of Engagement – Establishing Institutional Relations 9 Between Media Stakeholders Impact of Regional Dynamics on Afghanistan-Pakistan Media 11 Relations – What Went Wrong Recommendations for States, Media
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report No
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 444 | MARCH 2019 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org How Peace Was Made: An Inside Account of Talks between the Afghan Government and Hezb-e Islami By Qaseem Ludin Contents Background ...................................3 Talks Begin ................................... 5 Internal Consensus and Divisions .................................7 Components of the Peace Deal ....................................8 Sealing the Deal ......................... 12 Implementation of the Agreement ............................ 13 Lessons for Negotiations with the Taliban ........................... 14 Gulbuddin Hekmatyar addresses supporters in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, in March 2018. (Photo by Ghulamullah Habibi/EPA-EFE/ Shutterstock) Summary • For more than four decades, Afghan- • Peacemaking is a difficult process, the challenges and divisions that istan has been in a state of war and but often the most difficult part is had to be overcome in order to violent conflict that has destroyed how to start peace talks. Thus, the make the September 2016 peace much of the country’s physical and experience of negotiating peace agreement possible. social infrastructure and prevent- between the Afghan government • After the peace accord with ed the formation of a state stable and the Hezb-e Islami insurgent Hezb-e Islami, Afghans have an- enough to establish law and order. group offers unique insights on other historic chance to bring an • Although several internal and exter- peacemaking in the modern era. end to years of conflict with the nal factors contributed to the conflict • This report, based on the author’s Taliban. The Afghan government’s and its current political and security experience working as a negoti- negotiations with Hezb-e Islami environment, a key factor has been ator during talks between the Af- provide important lessons that can weak Afghan leadership, exacerbat- ghan government and Hezb-e Isla- be applied to future peace negoti- ed by political frictions among elites.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Security Cooperation in The
    This publicaion has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publicaion are the sole responsibility of ATR Consuling and can in no way be taken to relect the views of the European Union. CONTENTs Execuive Summary 1 Acronyms 2 Acknowledgements 5 Background and 6 Context Concept and 7 Background of the Heart of Asia Building r Commitment 8 States to the Heart of Asia Process Among Membe Map 1: 9 Heart of Asia Member States Exising Studies 10 on the Heart of Asia Process Approach and 11 Methodology Approach 11 Research Quesions 11 Methodology 12 Findings 13 Security Cooperaion’ Looking Beyond the Tradiional Deiniion of ‘ 13 Security Threats 14 in the Region Security Cooperaion 17 Mechanisms in the Region Obstacles to 22 Efecive Security Cooperaion in the Region Opportuniies for 23 Intensiied Security Cooperaion Incenives for 25 Intensiied Security Cooperaion Policy Opions 26 for the Heart of Asia Conclusion 29 Appendix I: 31 Afghanistan Most Relevant 32 Security Threats to Afghanistan Exising Security 32 Cooperaion Mechanisms Obstacles to 35 Efecive Security Cooperaion Opportuniies aion and 38 Incenives for Intensiied Security Cooper Promising Policy 40 Opions for the Heart of Asia Process Map 2: 40 Proposed Route of TAPI Gas Pipeline Project Appendix II: 42 Azerbaijan Most Relevant 43 Security Threats Exising Security 44 Cooperaion Mechanisms Obstacles to Efecive Security Cooperaion 45 Opportuniies and Incenives for Intensiied Security Cooperaion 46 Promising Policy Opions for the Heart of Asia Process
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S
    Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs December 21, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30588 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Summary Stated U.S. policy is to ensure that Afghanistan will not again become a base for terrorist attacks against the United States. Following policy reviews in 2009, the Obama Administration asserted that it was pursuing a well-resourced and integrated military-civilian strategy intended to pave the way for a gradual transition to Afghan leadership from July 2011 until the end of 2014. To carry out U.S. policy, a total of 51,000 additional U.S. forces were authorized by the two 2009 reviews, which brought U.S. troop numbers to a high of about 99,000, with partner forces adding about 42,000. On June 22, 2011, President Obama announced that the policy had accomplished most major U.S. goals and that a drawdown of 33,000 U.S. troops would take place by September 2012. The first 10,000 of these are to be withdrawn by the end of 2011 and the remainder of that number by September 2012. The transition to Afghan leadership began, as planned, in July 2011 in the first set of areas, four cities and three full provinces; a second and larger tranche of areas to be transitioned was announced on November 27, 2011. The U.S. official view is that security gains achieved by the surge could be at risk from weak Afghan governance and insurgent safe haven in Pakistan, and that Afghanistan will still need direct security assistance after 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortschrittsbericht Afghanistan Zur Unterrichtung Des Deutschen Bundestags
    [Geben Sie Text ein] Fortschrittsbericht Afghanistan zur Unterrichtung des Deutschen Bundestags Januar 2014 Fortschrittsbericht Afghanistan Januar 2014 Impressum Herausgeber Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung 11044 Berlin Stand Januar 2014 Weitere Informationen im Internet unter www.bundesregierung.de/afghanistan www.auswaertiges-amt.de/afghanistan www.bmvg.de/afghanistan www.bmz.de/afghanistan www.bmi.bund.de/afghanistan Seite | 2 Fortschrittsbericht Afghanistan Januar 2014 Inhaltsverzeichnis EINLEITUNG UND ZUSAMMENFASSUNG 4 I. SICHERHEIT 8 1. Sicherheitslage und Transition 8 2. Leistungsfähigkeit und Finanzierung der Sicherheitskräfte 12 3. Von ISAF zur Resolute Support Mission 16 4. Ortskräfte bei deutschen Stellen in Afghanistan 17 II. STAATSWESEN UND REGIERUNGSFÜHRUNG 18 5. Regierungsführung und Institutionen 18 6. Wahlen 24 7. Zivilgesellschaft und Menschenrechte 27 8. Versöhnung und Reintegration 31 III. WIEDERAUFBAU UND ENTWICKLUNG 33 9. Ausblick auf den Tokio-Prozess 34 10. Wirtschaftliche Entwicklung und Einkommen 35 11. Entwicklung der einzelnen Sektoren 37 ANHANG 43 GLOSSAR 45 Fortschrittsbericht Afghanistan Januar 2014 Einleitung und Zusammenfassung Die Fortschrittsberichte der Bundesregierung zur Lage in Afghanistan dienen der Unter- richtung des Deutschen Bundestages. Die in Afghanistan engagierten Ressorts – vor allem Auswärtiges Amt (AA), Bundesministerium des Innern (BMI), Bundesministerium der Vertei- digung (BMVg) und Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ) – erstellen
    [Show full text]
  • Pajhwok Afghan News (PAN) Weekly Election Coverage Newsletter, May 21-27
    Pajhwok Afghan News (PAN) Weekly Election Coverage Newsletter, May 21-27 Plots being hatched to divide Afghans: Abdullah Massoud pledges support to Ahmadzai By Muhammad Hassan Khetab May 21, 2014 - 19:09 By Azizullah Hamdard May 22, 2014 - 11:18 KABUL (Pajhwok): Frontrunner Dr. Abdullah Abdullah KABUL (Pajhwok): Former vice-president Ahmad Zia on Wednesday warned many plots were being hatched to Massoud on Thursday formally announced support to create differences among the Afghans on ethnic lines, presidential contender Dr. Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai in the saying such attempts would not be allowed to succeed. second round of the ballot. Addressing a gathering, where the Afghanistan Youth Zia Massoud pledged support to Ahmadzai at a meeting Solidarity Party’s head Jamil Karzai joined his camp, attended by the two leaders and members of the electoral Abdullah said those trying to fuel ethnic divisions among team at the Loya Jirga tent in Kabul. the Afghans would not be able to achieve their goals. A brother of assassinated jihadi hero Ahmad Shah “Many plots are underway; those who want to fuel Massoud, Zia Massoud has been the running mate of regional, tribal and ethnic differences should know that ex-foreign minister Dr. Zalmai Rassoul in the April 5 polls. such efforts will not come to fruition in Afghanistan,” the With the process heading to the second round, a number of former foreign minister added. political figures and first- round runners are joining forces He said strong-willed people, who discharged their with the two leading contenders. responsibility by thronging polling stations on April 5, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • US DEPARTMENT of STATE Office of the Spokesperson
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE Office of the Spokesperson ________________________________________________________________________________ For Immediate Release March 22, 2017 MEDIA NOTE LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Meeting of the Ministers of the Global Coalition – Working to Defeat ISIS U.S. Department of State Wednesday, March 22, 2017 AFGHANISTAN His Excellency Salahuddin Rabbani Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan ALBANIA His Excellency Ditmir Bushati Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Albania ARAB LEAGUE His Excellency Hossam Zaki Assistant Secretary General of the League of Arab States AUSTRALIA The Honorable Julie Bishop, M.P. Minister for Foreign Affairs of Australia AUSTRIA His Excellency Sebastian Kurz Federal Minister for Europe, Integration, and Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Austria BAHRAIN His Excellency Shaikh Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Bahrain BELGIUM His Excellency Dirk Wouters Ambassador of the Kingdom of Belgium to the United States BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA His Excellency Igor Crnadak Minister of Foreign Affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina BULGARIA His Excellency Tihomir Anguelov Stoytchev Ambassador of the Republic of Bulgaria to the United States CANADA The Honorable Chrystia Freeland Minister for Foreign Affairs of Canada CROATIA The Honorable Davor Ivor Stier Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of the Republic of Croatia CYPRUS His Excellency Ioannis Kasoulides Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic
    [Show full text]