sign in sign up
<<
Home , Acrosorus, Acystopteris, Arthropteris, Callistopteris, Christensenia (plant), Cochlidium

A JOURNAL ON TAXONOMIC , SOCIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY REINWARDTIA

A JOURNAL ON TAXONOMIC BOTANY, PLANT SOCIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY

Vol. 13(4): 317 —389, December 20, 2012

Chief Editor Kartini Kramadibrata (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia)

Editors Dedy Darnaedi (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia) Tukirin Partomihardjo (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia) Joeni Setijo Rahajoe (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia) Teguh Triono (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia) Marlina Ardiyani (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia) Eizi Suzuki (Kagoshima University, Japan) Jun Wen (Smithsonian Natural History Museum, USA)

Managing editor Himmah Rustiami (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia)

Secretary Endang Tri Utami

Lay out editor Deden Sumirat Hidayat

Illustrators Subari Wahyudi Santoso Anne Kusumawaty

Reviewers Ed de Vogel (Netherlands), Henk van der Werff (USA), Irawati (Indonesia), Jan F. Veldkamp (Netherlands), Jens G. Rohwer (Denmark), Lauren M. Gardiner (UK), Masahiro Kato (Japan), Marshall D. Sunberg (USA), Martin Callmander (USA), Rugayah (Indonesia), Paul Forster (Australia), Peter Hovenkamp (Netherlands), Ulrich Meve (Germany).

Correspondence on editorial matters and subscriptions for Reinwardtia should be addressed to: HERBARIUM BOGORIENSE, BOTANY DIVISION, RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY-LIPI, CIBINONG 16911, INDONESIA E-mail: [email protected] REINWARDTIA Vol 13, No 4, pp: 367 - 377

THE NEW PTERIDOPHYTE CLASSIFICATION AND SEQUENCE EM- PLOYED IN THE HERBARIUM BOGORIENSE (BO) FOR MALESIAN

Received July 19, 2012; accepted September 11, 2012

WITA WARDANI, ARIEF HIDAYAT, DEDY DARNAEDI Herbarium Bogoriense, Botany Division, Research Center for Biology-LIPI, Cibinong Science Center, Jl. Raya Jakarta -Bogor Km. 46, Cibinong 16911, Indonesia. E-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT. WARD AM, W., HIDAYAT, A. & DARNAEDI D. 2012. The new pteridophyte classification and sequence employed in the Herbarium Bogoriense (BO) for Malesian ferns. Reinwardtia 13(4): 367-377. — BO followed sequences written in the first Flora Malesiana series II for Malesian specimen arrangement and flora listing, which then updated as revision for pteridophyte families done successively. However, the sequence in this incomplete flora to some extent is problematic. Recent advancement in pteridophyte classification is available and expected to stabilize delimitation of families and genera. The paper reviews the two sequences and presents a consensus for specimen arrangement and flora listing of Malesian fern.

Key Words: Pteridophyte classification, sequence, Malesian fern.

ABSTRAK WARD AM, W., HIDAYAT, A. & DARNAEDI D. 2012. The new pteridophyte classification and sequence employed in The Herbarium Bogoriense (BO) for Malesian ferns. Reinwardtia 13(4): 367-377 . — Penataan spesimen dan pen- catatan flora paku-pakuan dari wilayah Malesia di Herbarium Bogoriense mengikuti klasifikasi yang termuat dalam edisi pertama Flora Malesiana II. Urutan penggolongan ini terus diperbaharui sejalan dengan kemajuan revisi flora ter- sebut. Namun penggolongan dalam flora yang belum tuntas tersebut tidak jarang menimbulkan banyak pertanyaan. Perkembangan terbaru dalam klasifikasi paku-pakuan telah diterbitkan dan diharapkan cukup stabil untuk diaplikasikan. Tulisan ini meninjau klasifikasi dalam Flora Malesiana dan klasifikasi paku-pakuan terbaru tersebut, serta menghadir- kan suatu urutan konsensus dari keduanya yang dapat diterapkan pada penataan spesimen dan pencatatan flora paku- pakuan dari wilayah Malesia

Kata kunci: Klasifikasi, paku-pakuan, urutan, paku Malesia.

INTRODUCTION Herbarium Bogor (BO) has been adopted sequence presented in the first volume of Flora There are major changes in the classification Malesiana series II, written by Holttum, for Malesi- of through the publication of APG I- an ferns and fern allies collection, that sorted in al- III and the lycophyte and fern linear sequence. The- phabetical . As he mentioned in his introduc- se two attempt to present a convenience sequence to tory note (1959), the groupings might changed in be applied in specimens arrangement, listing in flo- the final re-assessment at the conclusion of the ra, books, indices, etc., which is claimed to be more treatment. After three volumes, there are significant natural and reflecting evolutionary relationship departures in the families or genera groupings. The (Christenhusz et al, 2011a; Haston et al, 2009). revision has covered 15 families and groups until Both classification are much appreciated as sort of 1998. The remaining taxa mostly are the large or solution to the present classification, generated difficult ones that in total occupy considerable using the most recent research result, mainly by space in the herbarium. means of molecular approach. Nevertheless, contro- As the national herbarium, BO is referred for versies are still to remain. It is often the result of the correct plant identification in botanical research molecular studies is rather discordance with con- and works of, especially, university students in the ventional or morphological observations. Some re- country. This service is also considered as an effec- lationships are sound impossible or rather not con- tive way for disseminating updates of related re- vincing because of inadequate sampling. Hence, searches. BO consistently follows Flora Malesiana there are suggestions to consider appropriate adjust- as the most practical way to carry the service. How- ment in the application (Hawthorne & Hughes, ever, the flora is problematic to some extent. Mean- 2008; Sheperd, 2008; Stace, 2010). while, the expected better and new fern classifica-

367 368 REINWARDTIA [VOL.13 tion in Christenhusz et al. (2011a), with its subse- groups of taxa. It is quite unusual to group the quent papers, is somewhat different to the overall Grammitids with other , or having flora sequence. There has been no attempt found to enlarged with Adiantoids and Vittarids. synchronize Flora Malesiana with the new classifi- However, the inclusion of Ctenitis and Lastreopsis cation of fern and lycophyte. This paper reviews the to is a lot more sensible than to two sequences and proposes the best alternative for lump them in Group. Some switching of the alignment of families and genera of Malesian taxa is already predicted but some newly recognized fern in BO. families are fairly atypical. In the first volume of Flora Malesiana (1959), Contrasting Flora Malesiana sequence to the Holttum begun the indecisive fashion of delimiting New Classification fern , ended up with groups of genera. Most part of the first and second volume of revision covered by the same person which causes such de- Stace (2010) mentioned that adopt new dif- limitation quite common. The label "group" often ferent classification often halted predominantly for confused students that further oblige explanation. the reason of unfamiliarity. To our observation, the However, the revision is very functional in identify most recent classification of fern and lycophyte Malesian fern specimens. Problems occur whenever (Christenhusz et al, 2011a, 2011b, 2011c) which is one deals with untreated genera that excluded from largely based on the works published in Smith et al. its initial group. (2006), later is partly refined by Rothfels et al, Table 1 is presented as an attempt to decipher (2012), is obviously different from the previously the discrepancies between the two sequences. The adopted in BO but clarifies relationship in some second and third columns are conjointly sorted al-

No of Initial group in FMII Classification in FM revisions Notes Row 1956 Christenhusz et al. (2011a, c) Adiantum Group (Not yet revised) All of the member in- Adiantum cluded in Pteridaceae Anogramma See row 28 Ceratopteris Cerosora Cheilanthes Doryopteris 1 Hemionitis Notholaena Onychium Pellaea Pityrogramma Syngramma Schizolepton Taenitis Asplenium Group (Not yet revised) Diplora, Loxocaphe = Asplenium Asplenium Asplenium 2 Diplora Hymenasplenium Loxoscaphe Athyrium Group (Not yet revised) Callipteris = Anisocampium Anisocampium Athyrium Athyrium Gymnocarpium is includ- Callipteris Cornopteris ed in Dryopteris Group in Cornopteris Deparia FM II classification. Cystopteris Diplazium 3 Diplazium Acystopteris Dryoathyrium Cystopteris Gymnocarpium Diplaziopsis 2012] WARDANI et al.: The new pteridophyte classification in the Herbarium Bogoriense (BO) 369

Classification in No of Initial group in FMII FM revisions Christenhusz et al. Notes Row 1956 (2011a, c) Azollaceae The is moved to see row 29 4 Azolla Salviniaceae Blechnum Group (Revision published Doodia = Blechnum Blechnum soon) Blechnum Brainea Brainea Stenochlaena is member 5 Doodia Woodwardia of Pteris Group in FM II Woodwardia Stenochlaena classification.

Ch eiropleuriaceae In the FM II classifica- Cheiropleuria Cheiropleuria tion, Dipteris is initially Dipteris placed in Polypodiaceae but then not included in the revision.

Cyatheaceae Different from FM II Cyathea Alsophila revision, Cyatheaceae Dicksonia Cyathea consist of four genera of Cystodium Gymnosphaera the scaly one, while other Cibotium Sphaeropteris tree fern merit their own Culcita Dicksoniaceae family. Dicksonia 7 Cibotiaceae Cibotium Cystodiaceae Cystodium Culcitaceae Culcita

Davalliaceae Davalliaceae Unlike the FM II revi- Davallodes Davallodes sion, is Leucostegia placed in Hypodema- Davallia tiaceae, together with two Leucostegia genera, which in FM II classification is included 8 in Dryopteris Group and Tectaria group respec- tively (but then not in- cluded in the revision).

Dennstaedtia Group (Revision partly pub- Orthiopteris is placed in Dennstaedtia lished soon) Dennstaedtia Saccolomataceae. Sacco- Histiopteris Histiopteris loma is not recognized in Hypolepis Hypolepis FM II classification. Microlepia Microlepia Monachosorum Monachosorum 9 Orthiopteris Paesia Paesia Pteridium Pteridium Saccolomataceae Orthiopteris Saccoloma 370 REINWARDTIA [VOL.13

No of Initial group in FM II Classification in FM revisions Notes Row 1956 Christenhusz et al. (2011a, c) Dryopteris Group (Not yet revised) Dryopteridaceae Peranema = Dryopteris Acrophorus Acrophorus Currania Arachnoides Currania = Gymnocarpi- Diacalpe Diacalpe um, which is included in Didymochlaena Dryopsis Cystopteridaceae, see Dryopteris Dryopteris row 3 Gymnocarpium Polystichum Peranema Polystichopsis Didymochlaena is includ- Polystichum Stenolepia ed in Hypodematiaceae, Polystichopsis Dryopolistichum see row 8 Stenolepia Ctenitis Dryopolistichum in FM II Lastreopsis clasification is intially included in Tectaria Teratophyllum Group but then not in- 10 Lomagramma cluded in the revision Elaphoglossum Ctenitis and Lastreopsis Arthrobotrya are member of Tectaria Rumohra group in FM II revision.

The last four genera are member of Lomariopsis Group in the FM II revi- sion, in which the fifth is treated as a synonym. Rumohra is not recog- nized either in initial FM II classification.

Equisetaceae Equisetaceae Equisetum Equisetum Gleicheniaceae Different from FM II Dicranopteris Glei- Dicranopteris revision, Diplopterygium chenia Diplopterygium and Sticherus is recog- 12 Gleichenia nized as distinct Sticherus apart from Gleichenia.

Grammitidaceae (Not yet revised) All member of this Acrosorus group are included in Calymodon Polypodiaceae Ctenopteris See row 26 13 Nematopteris Oreogrammitis Prosaptia Scleroglossum (Not yet revised) Hymenophyllaceae Hymenophyllum Callistopteris Cephalomanes 14 Didymoglossum Hymenophyllum Trichomanes Vandenboschia Isoetaceae Isoetaceae 15 Isoetes Isoetes 2012] WARDANI et al.: The new pteridophyte classification in the Herbarium Bogoriense (BO) 371

Classification in No of Initial group in FM II FM revisions Christenhusz et al. Notes Row 1956 (2011a, c) Lindsaea Group In the FM II revision, Sphenomeris Sphenomeris = Sphenom- Tapeinidum Tapeinidum eris. Xyropteris Xyropteris 16 Lindsaea Lindsaea Odontosoria

Lomariopsis Group Unlike in FM II revision, Lomariopsis Lomariopsis four genera are included Thysanosoria Thysanosoria in Dryopteridaceae, see Teratophyllum Cyclopeltis row 10 Lomagramma 17 Elaphoglossum Cyclopeltis is member of Bolbitis Tectaria Group in the FM II revision.

Lycopodiaceae (Not yet revised) Lycopodiaceae Lycopodium Lycopodium 18 Lycopodiella Huperzia

Marattiaceae (Not yet revised) Macroglossom = Angiop- Angiopteris Angiopteris teris Christensenia Christensenia Macroglossum Ptisana Ptisana is a nomen 19 Marattia novum for Marattia of the old world

Matoniaceae Matoniaceae Matonia 20 Phanerosorus Phanerosorus

Marsileaceae (Not yet revised) Marsileaceae 21 Marsilea Marsilea Group (Revision published Nephrolepidaceae is included Arthropteris soon) Nephrolepis in , see row Nephrolepis 32 22 Oleandraceae Oleandra

Oph ioglossaceae (Not yet revised) Oph ioglossaceae Botrychium Botrychium 23 Helmintostachys Helmintostachys Ophioglossum Ophioglossum

Osmundaceae (Not yet revised) Osmundaceae Leptopteris Leptopteris 24 Osmunda Osmunda

Plagiogyriaceae Plagiogyriaceae 25 Plagiogyria Plagiogyria 372 REINWARDTIA [VOL.13

No of Initial group in FM II Classification in FM revisions Notes Row 1956 Christenhusz et al. (2011a, c) Polypodiaceae Polypodiaceae Belvisia = Aglaomorpha Arthromeris Arthromeris Loxogramme is not in- Belvisia Christiopteris cluded in the FM II revi- Christiopteris Drynaria sion Drynaria Goniophlebium Lecanopteris The second section of the Lecanopteris Lemmaphyllum column is member of Lepisorus Lepisorus Grammitidaceae in FM II Leptochilus Leptochilus classification Lemmaphyllum Loxogramme Microsorum Microsorum Xiphopteris = Cochlidi- Paraselliguea Paraselliguea um; Platycerium Platycerium Ctenopteris = Prosaptia; Podosorus Podosorus Nematopteris = Sclero- Polypodiopteris Polypodiopteris glossum Pyrrosia Pyrrosia 26 Selliguea Selliguea Underlined genera is not Thylacopteris Thylacopteris recognized in initial FM II classification. Acrosorus Calymodon Chrysosrammitis Cochlidium Ctenopterella Dasygrammitis Grammitis Micropolypodium Oreogrammitis Prosaptia Radiogrammitis Scleroglossum Themelium Xiphopterella

Psilotaceae In FM II classification, 27 Psilotuceue (Not yet revised) Psilotum Tmesipteris is placed in Psilotum Tmesipteris its own family. 2012] WARDANI et al.: The new pteridophyte classification in the Herbarium Bogoriense (BO) 373

Classification in No of Initial group in FMII FM revisions Christenhusz et al. Notes Row 1956 (2011a, c) Pteris Group Not yet revised Pteridaceae Hemipteris & Schizoste- Acrostichum Acrostichum ge = Pteris Hemipteris Adiantum Lepidocaulon Anogramma Lepidocaulon = Histi- Pteris Aspleniopsis opteris, Dennstaedtiace- Schizostege Austrogramme ae, see row 9 Stenochlaena Ceratopteris Cerosora Stenochlaena moved to Cheilanthes Blechnaceae see row 5 Coniogramme Doryopteris All the member of Adi- Haplopteris antum and Vittaria 28 Hemionitis Group included here Notholaena Schizolepton = Taenitis Onychium Pellaea Vaginularia Pityrogramma = Monogramma Pteris Syngramma Taenitis Antrophyum Haplopteris Monogramme Rheopteris Vittaria Salviniaceae Revised only for Az- Salviniaceae In the revisionAzolla TO Azolla olla Azolla form its own family, Salvinia Salvinia Azollaceae

Selaginellaceae Not yet revised Selaginellaceae 30 Selaginella Selaginella

Schizaeaceae Schizaeaceae Lygodium moved to its Schizaea Schizaea own family 31 Lygodium Lygodiaceae Lygodium Tectaria Group Tectariaceae Tectaridium, Pteridrys Chlamydogramme, Pleocnemia Pleocnemia Heterogonium = Tectar- Ctenitis Tectaria ia Tectaria Aenigmopteris Ctenitis, Lastreopsis Tectaridium Psomiocarpa moved to Dryopterida- 32 Chlamydogramme Arthropteris ceae, see row 10 Heterogonium Aenigmopteris Cyclopeltis moved to Psomiocarpa Lomariopsidaceae, see Cyclopeltis Lastreopsis row 17 374 REINWARDTIA [VOL.13

Classification in No of Initial group in FMII FM revisions Christenhusz et al. Notes Row 1956 (2011a, c) Th elypteridaceae Th elypteridaceae Ampelopteris Cyclosorus The genus Dictyocline = Amphineuron Macrothelypteris Cyclosorus, is recognized Chingia Metathelypteris in the initial FM II classi- Christella fication but then was not Coryphopteris Pseudophegopteris included in the revision. Cyclogramma Cyclosorus Coryphopteris, Nan- Macrothelypteris nothelypteris, Mesophlebion Parathelypteris = Metathelypteris Thelypteris 33 Nannothelypteris Parathelypteris The rest of the genera in Phegopteris FM II revision are syno- Plesioneuron nyms for Cyclosorus. Pneumatopteris Pronephrium Pseudocyclosorus Pseudophegopteris Sphaerostephanos Stegnogramma Thelypteris Trigonospora Tmesipteridaceae (Not yet revised) This genus is included in Tmesipteris Psilotaceae, see row 27 Vittaria Group (Not yet revised) All member of this Antrophyum group now included in 35 Monogramma Pteridaceae Vaginularia See row 26 Vittaria phabetically as applied in specimen arrangement in its subsequent papers) is based on fairly large data BO. Later in the table, these two are referred as FM set of the most recent studies which then confident- II classification. The explanation in column "Notes" ly expected to perform a good classification. How- refers to genera listed in the fourth column ever, applying new sequence must consider careful- ("Classification in Christenhusz et al. (2011a, c)") ly the cost of shifting. First, possibility of signifi- contrasted to the FM II classification. Some genera cant change to the classification is always present in are underlined; refer to those that not included in the future. Second, rearranging hundreds of pigeon- the particular family or group in the FM II classifi- holes would demand a lot of time and resources cation. The genus/genera written before the equal which is fairly limited. Third, BO has priority of sign "=" is coming from the FM II classification, work, i.e. contribute in finishing the Flora Malesi- considered as the synonyms of the genus written ana revision, rather than to deal with undone new afterward in the Christenhusz' classification. The combination caused by splitting or lumping genera. table is confined to families and genera occurred in It is here, proposed BO to adopt these following Malesian region. actions for the Malesian fern collection arrangement and flora listing: 1. For genera in the indecisive groupings after FM Preferred option for BO II revision, their placement in the family could follow linear sequence in Christenhusz et al. Good classification should reflect systematic (2011a, c) and the subsequent papers. This relationship among the taxa, thus provides high lev- would dismiss the confusion over the term el of predictivity which then will endure for the "group" and provide the right niche for genera foreseeable future (Stuessy, 2009; Stace, 2010). The excluded from the flora revision. For example, new classification (Christenhusz et al., 2011a and in the Tectaria group of FM II revision, some 2012] WARDANI et al.: The new pteridophyte classification in the Herbarium Bogoriense (BO) 375

of the genera included are more often consid- Loxogramme and grammitids fern shall be ar- ered closer to dryopterids. Hence, this grouping ranged as in the recent linear sequence. leads to the confusion over delimiting the later. Moreover, Hypodematium, was initially In summary, the Malesian fern collection in included in the Tectaria group, after the revi- BO would be arranged according to the following sion were left alienated. However, it must be sequence (in alphabetical order): anticipated that changing arrangement in this two groups according to the more recent linear Aspleniaceae sequence will result in considerable space is- Asplenium Hymenasplenium sue, and proposing over than 20 new combina- Athyriaceae tions is in necessity. This is partly because Anisocampium some members of the Lomariopsis group and Athyrium Lindsaea group in FM II revision are involved. Cornopteris Nevertheless, it is recommended not to discern Deparia Diplazium the new combinations. Other than change the Azollaceae placement of genera in families, it is preferable Azolla to entrust them as revised in the flora. Blechnaceae For genera in families after revision, the Blechnum placing shall be kept as in revision instead of Brainea Stenochlaena following the more recent linear sequence. The Woodwardia later option will caused the necessity to create Cheiropleuriaceae many new combinations or to do nomenclatural Cheiropleuria corrections, as happen earlier in the ferns of Cyatheaceae Cibotium Thailand (Lindsay & Middleton, 2009). The Culcita most noticeable example is Cyatheaceae and Cyathea . The splitting of Cyathea to Cystodium four genera and lumping 22 genera in Dicksonia Thelypteridaceae to six will generate nomen- Cystopteridaceae Cystopteris clatural problems. Instead of creating new Gymnocarpium names and doing more changes in specimen DavaHiaceae order, since BO sort specimen alphabetically, it Davallodes is best to leave them as the current arrangement Davallia based on the flora. Leucostegia Dennstaedtiaceae 3. For genera that are not yet revised, they should Dennstaedtia be treated the same as treating the indecisive Histiopteris Hypolepis groups. However, whenever the flora updated Microlepia and the sequence is somewhat different to the Monachosorum new classification, it is preferable to priorities Paesia the Flora. There will be none or minor changes Pteridium to specimen arrangement in families with simi- Diplaziopsidaceae Diplaziopsis lar member of genera. Initial group with slight- Dipteridaceae ly mixed genera would have to split, such as Dipteris Athyria group to three families (see Rothfels et Dryopteridaceae al., 2012 for Diplaziopsidaceae), or Dennstaed- Acrophorus tia group to two families. This alteration in- Arachnoides Arthrobotrya volves only few species that would not generate Bolbitis space problem. However, families with medi- Ctenitis um to voluminous combination of genera such Diacalpe as Dryopteridaceae with additional member Dryopolistichum coming from Tectaria group and Lomariopsis Dryopsis Dryopteris group; Pteridaceae with the adiantoids and vit- Elaphoglossum tarids appended; also Polypodiaceae enlarged Lastreopsis with grammitids, will require extra rooms. The Lomagramma revised genera of Polypodiaceae shall be sorted Polystichum as in the flora while the untreated one such as Polystichopsis Rumohra 376 REINWARDTIA [VOL.13

Stenolepia Grammitis Teratophyllum Lecanopteris Equisetaceae Lemmaphyllum Equisetum Lepisorus Gleicheniaceae Leptochilus Dicranopteris Loxogramme Gleichenia Micropolypodium Hymenophyllaceae Microsorum Callistopteris Oreogrammitis Cephalomanes Paraselliguea Didymoglossum Platycerium Hymenophyllum Podosorus Trichomanes Polypodiopteris Prosaptia Vandenboschia Pyrrosia Hypodematiaceae Radiogrammitis Didymochlaena Scleroglossum Hypodematium Selliguea Isoetaceae Themelium Isoetes Thylacopteris Lindsaeaceae Xiphopterella Lindsaea Psilotaceae Odontosoria Psilotum Sphenomeris Tmesipteris Tapeinidum Pteridaceae Xyropteris Acrostichum Lomariopsidaceae Adiantum Cyclopeltis Anogramma Lomariopsis Antrophyum Thysanosoria Aspleniopsis Lycopodiaceae Austrogramme Huperzia Ceratopteris Lycopodium Cerosora Lycopodiella Cheilanthes Marattiaceae Coniogramme Angiopteris Doryopteris Christensenia Haplopteris Ptisana Hemionitis Matoniaceae Monogramma Matonia Notholaena Phanerosorus Onychium Marsileaceae Pellaea Marsilea Pityrogramma Nephrolepidaceae Pteris Nephrolepis Syngramma Oleandraceae Taenitis Oleandra Vittaria Ophioglossaceae Saccolomataceae Botrychium Orthiopteris Helmintostachys Saccoloma Ophioglossum Salviniaceae Osmundaceae Salvinia Leptopteris Schizaeaceae Osmunda Lygodium Plagiogyriaceae Schizaea Plagiogyria Selaginellaceae Polypodiaceae Selaginella Acrosorus Tectariaceae Aglaomorpha Aenigmopteris Arthromeris Arthropteris Calymodon Pteridrys Christiopteris Pleocnemia Chrysogrammitis Psomiocarpa Cochlidium Tectaria Ctenopterella Thelypteridaceae Dasygrammitis Ampelopteris Drynaria Amphineuron Goniophlebium Chingia 2012] WARDANI et al.: The new pteridophyte classification in the Herbarium Bogoriense (BO) 377

Christella phytes, ferns, gymnosperms and angiosperms". Phy- Coryphopteris totaxa 19: 4-6. Cyclogramma CHRISTENHUSZ, M. J. M. & SCHNEIDER, H. 2011c. Cyclosorus Corrections to Phytotaxa 19: Linear sequence of ly- Macrothelypteris cophytes and ferns. Phytotaxa 28: 50-52. Mesophlebion Metathelypteris HASTON, E., RICHARDSON, J. E., STEVENS, P. F., Nannothelypteris CHASE, M. W. & HARRIS, D. J. 2009. The Linear Parathelypteris Angiosperm, Phytogeny Group (LAPG) III: a linear Phegopteris sequence of the families in APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Plesioneuron Soc. 161:128-131. Pneumatopteris HAWTHORNE, W. D. & HUGHES, C. E. 2008. Opti- Pronephrium mising linear taxon sequences derived from phyloge- Pseudocyclosorus netic trees - a reply to Hasten & al. Taxon 57 (3): Pseudophegopteris 698-704. Sphaerostephanos Stegnogramma LINDSAY, S. & MIDDLETON, D. J. 2009. New combi- Thelypteris nations in the ferns of Thailand. Edinburgh J. Bot. 6 Trigonospora (2): 355-361. ROTHFELS, C.J ., SUNDUE, M. A., KUO, L., LARS- SON, A., KATO, M, SCHUETTPELZ, E. & PRY- ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ER, K. M. 2012. A Revised family-level classifica- tion for eupolypod II ferns (Polypodiidae: Polypo- The corresponding author would like to thank Dr. diales). Taxon 61(3): 515-533. Peter Hovenkamp for his valuable information in fern SHEPHERD, K.A. 2008. Consensus or complacency? A specimen arrangement at L and progression in the Flora discussion of the proposed new collection sequence Malesiana Series II revision. at the WA Herbarium. Newsl.Aust.Syst.Bot.Soc. 135: 5-8. REFERENCES SMITH, A. R., PRYER, K. M, SCHUETTPELZ, E., KORALL, P., SCHNEIDER, H. & WOLF, P. G. CHRISTENHUSZ, M. J. M, ZHANG, X. & SCHNEI- 2006. A classification for extant Ferns. Taxon 55 (3): DER, H. 2011a. A linear sequence of extant families 705-731. and genera of lycophytes and ferns. Phytotaxa 19: 7- STACE, C. A. 2010. Classification by molecules: What's 54. in it for field botanist? Watsonia 28: 103-122. CHRISTENHUSZ, M. J. M, CHASE, M.W. & FAY, M. STUESSY, T. F. 2009. Plant . The Systematic F. 2011b. Preface to "Linear sequence, classification, Evaluation of Comparative Data. ed. 2. New York: synonymy and bibliography of vascular : Lyco- Columbia University Press. INSTRUCTION TO AUTHORS Taxonomic identification key should be prepared using the aligned couplet type. Reinwardtia is a scientific irregular journal on Strict adherence to the International Code of plant taxonomy, plant ecology, and ethnobotany. Botanical Nomenclature is observed, so that Manuscript intended for a publication should be taxonomic and nomenclatural novelties should be written in English represent an article which has not clearly shown. English description for new taxon been published in any other journal or proceedings. proposed should be provided and the herbaria where Every manuscript will be sent to two blind the type specimens area deposited should be reviewers. presented. Name of taxon in taxonomic treatment should be presented in the long form that is name of Two printed copies (on A4 paper) of the taxon, author's name, year of publication, manuscript of not more than 200 pages together abbreviated journal or book title, volume, number with an electronic copy prepared on Word and page. Processor computer program using Time New Romance letter type and saved in Rich Text File Map, line drawing illustration, or photograph must be submitted. preferably should be prepared in landscape presentation to occupy two columns. Illustration For the style of presentation, authors should must be submitted as original art accompanying, but follow the latest issue of Reinwardtia very closely. separated from the manuscript. On electronic copy, Title of the article should be followed by author's the illustration should be saved in jpg or gif format name and mailing address in one-paragraphed at least 350 pixels. Legends or illustration must be English abstract of not more than 250 words. submitted separately at the end of the manuscript. Keywords should be given below each abstract. On a separated paper, author(s) should send the Bibliography, list of literature cited or references preferred running title of the article submitted. follow the Harvard system. REINWARDTIA Vol. 13. No. 4. 2012 CONTENTS Page

SRI ENDARTI RAHAYU, TATIK CHIKMAWATI, KUSWATA KARTAWINATA & ALEX HARTANA. Morphology vs. taxonomy in the family Pandanaceae: a case study in the Javanese species 317

SRI RAHAYU. Hoya (Apocynaceae: Asclepiadoideae) diversity in Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park, West Java, Indonesia 331

DEBY ARIFIANI, ADI BASUKRIADI & TATIK CHIKMAWATI. Newly described species of Endiandra (Lauraceae) from New Guinea 341

ALEX SUMADIJAYA. Six years experience on plant identification services: case study in Herbarium Bogoriense 347

BAYU ADJIE, AGUNG KURNIAWAN, NORIO SAHASHI & YASUYUKI WATANO. Dicksonia timorense (Diksoniaceae), a hemi-epiphytic new species of tree fern endemic on Timor Island, Indonesia ... 3 5 7

IAN M. TURNER. Nomenclatural notes relevant to the flora of Indonesia 363

WITA WARDANI, ARIEF HIDAYAT & DEDY DARNAEDI. The new pteridophyte classification and se- quence employed in The Herbarium Bogoriense (BO) for Malesian ferns 367

DIAH SULISTIARTNI. The orchids genus Dilochia in Indonesia 379

DEDY DARNAEDI. Book review 389

Reinwardtia is a LIPI acredited Journal (258/AU 1/P2MBI/05/2010)

Herbarium Bogoriense Botany Division Research Center for Biology - LIPI Cibinong, Indonesia