DOCSLIB.ORG

A DICTIONARY of CLICHÉS Other Partridge Titles Published by Routledge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A DICTIONARY of CLICHÉS Other Partridge Titles Published by Routledge A DICTIONARY OF CLICHÉS Other Partridge titles published by Routledge: A CONCISE DICTIONARY OF SLANG AND UNCONVENTIONAL ENGLISH edited by Paul Beale A DICTIONARY OF CATCH PHRASES A DICTIONARY OF SLANG AND UNCONVENTIONAL ENGLISH edited by Paul Beale ORIGINS: AN ETYMOLOGICAL DICTIONARY OF MODERN ENGLISH THE ROUTLEDGE DICTIONARY OF HISTORICAL SLANG edited by Jacqueline Simpson SHORTER SLANG DICTIONARY by Eric Partridge and Paul Beale; edited by Rosalind Fergusson SHAKESPEARE’S BAWDY foreword by Stanley Wells YOU HAVE A POINT THERE: A GUIDE TO PUNCTUATION AND ITS ALLIES A DICTIONARY OF CLICHÉS WITH AN INTRODUCTORY ESSAY By ERIC PARTRIDGE Occidit miseros crambe repetita scriptores Juvenal emendatus. London and New York First published in Great Britain September 1940 2nd Edition January 1941 3rd Edition (Revised) January 1947 4th Edition January 1950 5th Edition and first published as a paperback in 1978 Published in the USA by Routledge . 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk”. © Eric Partridge 1940 , 1941 , 1947 , 1950 , 1978 No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission from the publishers, except for the quotation of brief passages in criticism. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Partridge, Eric A dictionary of clichés.—5th ed. 1. English Language—Terms and Phrases I. Title 423 ’. 1 PE1689 78–40557 ISBN 0-203-37996-9 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-38613-2 (Adobe e-Reader Format) ISBN 0-415-06555-0 (Print Edition) TO THE MEMORY OF THE LATE A.W.STEWART PROFESSOR OF CHEMISTRY WRITER OF THRILLERS LOVER OF GOOD ENGLISH GRATEFULLY FROM THE AUTHOR WHOM HE CONSIDERABLY HELPED IN THAT EXCELLENT BLOOD SPORT: CLICHÉ-HUNTING CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE TO THE 5TH EDITION ix PREFACE x INTRODUCTION xi A DICTIONARY OF CLICHÉS 1 PREFACE TO THE 5TH EDITION SINCE the latest edition of this book appeared a few years ago, the situation seems to have become worse. As we advance scientifically and technologically, and as standards of living improve, we tend to become lazier and slacker in our attitude towards speech and writing: instead of being more alert and adventurous, we resort more and more to ‘the good old cliché’. Not only in the Press, radio, TV, but also—and not only as a result of their insidious influence—in everyday life, we remain faithful to all the old clichés and adopt the new, foisted on us by politicians and publicists. Only those of us who are concerned to keep the language fresh and vigorous regard, with dismay, the persistence of these well-worn substitutes for thinking and the mindless adoption of new ones. The danger is seen at its clearest when we listen to public figures of undoubted ability and read the works of wellknown writers of every sort—and suddenly we realize how often they bore us by employing a cliché when they could so easily have delighted us with something vivid or, at the least, precise. Among the newer clichés, two stand out from among the ‘things better left unsaid’: in this day and age, which, originally possessing sonority and dignity, now implies mental decrepitude and marks a man for the rest of his life; and its mentally retarded offspring, at this point in time: ‘at present’, or ‘nowadays’ or, usually, the simple ‘now’ would suffice. Notably, the new edition is available as a paperback. And so, besides the general intelligent public, teachers and, our torch-bearers, students will find it much more accessible. PREFACE THAT some such book as this is needed has been indicated, shown, proved to me in several ways and on many occasions: the most important occasion could not be made public without a gross breach of good faith and a sad lack of tact. (A pity; for it was so startling as to be almost indecently convincing.) Having formerly been a graceless sinner in this matter of clichés, I know how useful a dictionary of clichés could be to others. To the clichés I have subjoined a synonym or an explanation only where necessary; but I have in many instances established the etymological or semantic origin, determined the status, and named the author (or work) in whom (or which) the phrase first occurred; to quotation-clichés I have added the context and, sometimes, amplified the quotation. By the extremely border-line cases, I have done my best. A note of authentic (and authenticated) omissions will be gratefully received; to collect clichés is not an easy job—after the first three or four hundred. I gladly thank Professor A.W. Stewart, Mr Wilson Benington, and Mr Allen Walker Read (American clichés) for their assistance in accumulating clichés, but they are not to be held responsible for anything, either in the Introduction or in the Dictionary itself. London. February 28, 1940. INTRODUCTION CLICHÉS* IN an address delivered in December 1938 to the Institute of Journalists, Mr Frank Whitaker remarked, ‘As to clichés, I daresay we are all in agreement’. But are we? If you ask the averagely well educated person, ‘What is a cliché?’, he will look at you in pity and say ‘Oh, well! you know what a cliché is’, and hesitate, and stumble, and become incoherent. In November 1939, there met in conference a body of learned and able men: someone brought up the subject of clichés: everyone’s opinion was different: what one included, another excluded; what one excluded, another included. In short, it is a vexed question (cliché). In 1902, Edmund Gosse scathingly said that ‘All but the most obvious motives tend to express themselves no longer as thoughts but as clichés’; in 1910, O.Henry in Whirligigs invented a story based on the widespread use of clichés, and in it he wrote, ‘It was wonderful… And most wonderful of all are words, and how they make friends one with another, being oft associated, until not even obituary notices do them part’ (‘until death do them part’: cliché); and in 1932, that acute dialectician and admirable prose-writer, Mr Frank Binder, went so far as to say (cliché) that ‘There is no bigger peril either to thinking or to education than the popular phrase’, in which he included both catch-phrase and cliché. What, therefore, is a cliché? Perhaps intellectual and intelligent opinion has not yet been so far crystallized as to justify a definition. The Oxford English Dictionary says that it is ‘a stereotyped expression, a commonplace phrase’. I * An abridged version (seven-thirteenths the length of this) appeared in John o’ London’s Weekly in March, 1940. should (ex cathedra ignorantiœ, as Mr Humbert Wolfe once said wittily of someone else) like to enlarge on that definition and render it more practical, more comprehensive. The origin of the term may help, for, as Littré shows, cliché is the substantivized participle of clicher, a variant of cliquer, ‘to click’; clicher is a die-sinkers’ term for ‘to strike melted lead in order to obtain a cast’; hence, a cliché is a stereotyped expression—a phrase ‘on tap’ as it were—and this derivative sense, which has been current in France since the early ’eighties, came to England ca. 1890. Revenons à nos moutons (cliché). A cliché is an outworn commonplace; a phrase, or short sentence, that has become so hackneyed that careful speakers and scrupulous writers shrink from it because they feel that its use is an insult to the intelligence of their audience or public: ‘a coin so battered by use as to be defaced’ (George Baker). Clichés range from fly-blown phrases (‘much of a muchness’; ‘to all intents and purposes’), metaphors that are now pointless (‘lock, stock and barrel’), formulas that have become mere counters (‘far be it from me to…’)—through sobriquets that have lost all their freshness and most of their significance (‘the Iron Duke’)—to quotations that are nauseating (‘cups that cheer but not inebriate’), and foreign phrases that are tags (‘longo intervallo’, ‘bête noire’). Why are clichés so extensively used? Their ubiquity is remarkable and rather frightening. ‘Haste encourages them, but more often they spring from mental laziness’ (Frank Whitaker); then, too, they are a convenience, of which more anon (cliché). A half-education—that snare of the half-baked and the ready-made—accounts for many: an uncultured, little-reading person sees a stock phrase and thinks it apt and smart; he forgets that its aptness should put him on guard. The love of display often manifests itself in the adoption of foreign phrases (especially French) and Classical tags (Latin, not Greek). The use of clichés approximates to the use of proverbs, and certain proverbial phrases lie on the Tom Tiddler’s Ground or No Man’s Land between the forces of Style and Conscience entrenched on the one side and those of Lack of Style and Consciencelessness on the other: but proverbs are instances of racial wisdom, whereas clichés are instances of racial inanition. It is perhaps not irrelevant to note that with the rapidly decreasing popularity of proverbs among the middle and upper classes, clichés are, there, becoming increasingly popular. But are not clichés sometimes justifiable? To say ‘Never’ would be going too far. In the address from which I have already quoted twice, an address reprinted in The Journal of the Institute of Journalists, January 1939, Mr Whitaker says that he has ‘heard their use in [Association] football reports defended on the ground that the public expects them and would feel lost without them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rational Wishful Thinking
    Rational self-deception Eli Spiegelman a Jan 31, 2018 a CEREN, EA 7477, Burgundy School of Business - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 29 rue Sambin, Dijon 21000, France. [email protected] Keywords: Wishful thinking; self-deception; beliefs; choice theory; experiment; regret theory; ambiguity JEL D8, D9 Funding This research benefitted from funding from LESSAC, Burgundy School of Business. Abstract This note presents a model of wishful thinking as manipulation of prior beliefs, and a novel experimental test. The theoretical context is a three-period model, in which the agent is faced with a state-contingent optimal action, in which one state yields a higher payoff. In period 0 she observes the objective prior probability that each state will occur, but may alter her beliefs about these probabilities (self-deceive). The beliefs she chooses in period 0 determine her action in period 1 as a standard maximization procedure. In period 2, a signal yields information about the state of the world. A key assumption is that this signal may not be perfectly revealing. It is shown that the objective prior is optimal if and only if the signal in period 2 is perfectly revealing. Predictions of the theory are tested in a bet-choice experiment. I then present an experimental test designed to investigate the model’s predictions. Subjects choose to play a bet or pass it up for another, and the experimental control varies whether learn about the second bet upon taking the first. The results of the experiment are also compared to the literature on regret theory and ambiguity aversion.
    [Show full text]
  • Polygamy As a Red Herring in the Same-Sex Marriage Debate
    012306 09_KHALSA.DOC 2/6/2006 10:22 AM Note POLYGAMY AS A RED HERRING IN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DEBATE RUTH K. KHALSA INTRODUCTION Critics of same -sex marriage have argued that if same-sex marriage is legalized, then eventually polygamy and other currently prohibited sexual relationships, such as bestiality and incest, will be legalized as well. The polygamy issue received increased attention during the 1996 congressional hearings1 on the Defense of Marriage Act.2 Representative Bob Inglis of South Carolina asked, “If a person had an ‘insatiable desire’ to marry more than one wife . what argument did gay activists have to deny him a legal, polygamous marriage?”3 That same year, the Supreme Court decided Romer v. Evans,4 holding unconstitutional a Colorado state amendment that would have repealed existing city ordinances prohibiting Copyright © 2005 by Ruth K. Khalsa. 1. Professor Hadley Arkes stated that: [I]f marriage . could mean just anything the positive law proclaimed it to mean, then the positive law could define just about anything as a marriage. [W]hy shouldn’t it be possible to permit a mature woman, past child bearing, to marry her grown son? In fact, why would it not be possible to permit a man, much taken with himself, to marry himself? . [Although] I am not predicting that, if gay marriage were allowed, we would be engulfed by incest and polygamy[,] . [w]hat is being posed here is a question of principle: [w]hat is the ground on which the law would turn back these challenges? Defense of Marriage Act: Hearings on H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Thinking Clearly
    For Sabine The Art of Thinking Clearly Rolf Dobelli www.sceptrebooks.co.uk First published in Great Britain in 2013 by Sceptre An imprint of Hodder & Stoughton An Hachette UK company 1 Copyright © Rolf Dobelli 2013 The right of Rolf Dobelli to be identified as the Author of the Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the publisher, nor be otherwise circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. A CIP catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library. eBook ISBN 978 1 444 75955 6 Hardback ISBN 978 1 444 75954 9 Hodder & Stoughton Ltd 338 Euston Road London NW1 3BH www.sceptrebooks.co.uk CONTENTS Introduction 1 WHY YOU SHOULD VISIT CEMETERIES: Survivorship Bias 2 DOES HARVARD MAKE YOU SMARTER?: Swimmer’s Body Illusion 3 WHY YOU SEE SHAPES IN THE CLOUDS: Clustering Illusion 4 IF 50 MILLION PEOPLE SAY SOMETHING FOOLISH, IT IS STILL FOOLISH: Social Proof 5 WHY YOU SHOULD FORGET THE PAST: Sunk Cost Fallacy 6 DON’T ACCEPT FREE DRINKS: Reciprocity 7 BEWARE THE ‘SPECIAL CASE’: Confirmation Bias (Part 1) 8 MURDER YOUR DARLINGS: Confirmation Bias (Part 2) 9 DON’T BOW TO AUTHORITY: Authority Bias 10 LEAVE YOUR SUPERMODEL FRIENDS AT HOME: Contrast Effect 11 WHY WE PREFER A WRONG MAP TO NO
    [Show full text]
  • Griffis V. Luban: a Red Herring in the High Seas of Personal Jurisdiction Laura S
    William Mitchell Law Review Volume 29 | Issue 2 Article 15 2002 Griffis v. Luban: A Red Herring in the High Seas of Personal Jurisdiction Laura S. Ferster Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr Recommended Citation Ferster, Laura S. (2002) "Griffis v. Luban: A Red Herring in the High Seas of Personal Jurisdiction," William Mitchell Law Review: Vol. 29: Iss. 2, Article 15. Available at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr/vol29/iss2/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in William Mitchell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Ferster: Griffis v. Luban: A Red Herring in the High Seas of Personal Juri FINAL FERSTER GRIFFIS.DOC 10/28/2002 10:47 PM GRIFFIS V. LUBAN: A RED HERRING IN THE HIGH SEAS OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION Laura S. Ferster† I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................343 II. GRIFFIS:FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY..............................345 A. Facts ............................................................................345 B. Griffis in the Minnesota Court of Appeals........................346 C. Griffis in the Minnesota Supreme Court ..........................347 III. ANALYSIS OF THE GRIFFIS HOLDING......................................348 A. “Sound Bites” of Fair Play and Substantial
    [Show full text]
  • L-Fil-Let/14 Critica Letteraria E Letterature Comparate
    DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN STUDI UMANISTICI – TRADIZIONE E CONTEMPORANEITÀ CICLO XXX S.S.D.: L-FIL-LET/14 CRITICA LETTERARIA E LETTERATURE COMPARATE IL MITO CLASSICO NELLA DRAMMATURGIA DI LINGUA PORTOGHESE: I CICLI ARGONAUTICO, TEBANO E TROIANO Coordinatore: Chiar.ma Prof.ssa Cinzia Bearzot Tutor: Chiar.ma Prof.ssa Maria Pia Pattoni Tesi di Dottorato di Corrado Cuccoro Matricola: 4411568 Anno Accademico 2016/2017 1 Ai miei cari assenti 2 INTRODUZIONE La drammaturgia lusofona che a vario titolo si pone in rapporto dialettico con il retaggio culturale greco-latino costituisce un campo di esperienze sorprendentemente vasto e variegato, che solo nel corrente secolo ha attratto l’attenzione degli studiosi – portoghesi, primi tra tutti1 –, ausiliati dalle nuove risorse informatiche, in una prospettiva comparatistica sistematica e virtualmente ricettiva di ogni istanza intertestuale, in senso diacronico e sincronico, intralinguistico2 e interlinguistico (afferente cioè alle fonti greche e latine come alla produzione estera omologa3). Che il quadro teoretico di tale prospettiva rimanga d’altro canto non del tutto risolto anche per aspetti fondamentali (come si vedrà qui e nelle Considerazioni finali) si deve, almeno in parte, alla fase espansiva – verrebbe da dire “eruttiva” – della ricerca e alla parcellizzazione degli approcci disciplinari concomitanti, e talvolta concorrenti, nella galassia comparatistica: si pensi agli ormai imponenti Classical Reception Studies, Traductological Studies, Post-colonial Studies4, Gender Studies. Tanto in Portogallo quanto in Brasile, inoltre, gli studi tendono a concentrarsi sulla fortuna di singole figure mitiche o di determinati motivi greco-latini entro i rispettivi confini nazionali, magari sullo sfondo dei contesti geopolitici di appartenenza (l’Europa dell’Unione, l’America latina), laddove la storia e la lingua comuni dell’ex impero consentirebbero ricognizioni impregiudicate e più ambiziose5.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Disparate Impact Liability Does Not Induce Hiring Quotas
    The Q-Word as Red Herring: Why Disparate Impact Liability Does Not Induce Hiring Quotas Ian Ayres* and Peter Siegelman** I. Introduction The debates over the passage of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act' were marked by passionate disagreement: conservatives objected to the legislation as an unwarranted interference with employers' freedom of contract, while liberal supporters considered it a first step toward racial justice. While disagreement about what employment discrimination law should do has continued-in much the same form-to this day,3 there has been surprising consensus about the mechanism by which Title VII actually works:4 whether it is thought of as inadequate or excessive, Title VII is * William K. Townsend Professor of Law, Yale Law School. ** Research Fellow, American Bar Foundation and Olin Law and Economics Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School. Henry Hansmann made helpful comments, as did Keith Hylton on a much earlier version of some of the ideas. We also gratefully acknowledge many constructive discussions with members of the Symposium on The Changing Workplace. Dawn Jeglum-Bartusch, Franklin Parlamis, and Cathy Sharkey provided excellent research assistance. 1. 42 U.S.C. § 2000a (1994). 2. See ALFRED W. BLUMROSEN, MODERN LAW: THE LAW TRANSMISSION SYSrEM AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 43 (1993) ("The common ground between [southern Democrats and conservative Republicans in the U.S. Senate] was the desire to minimize federal regulation. Conservative Republicans did not want business hobbled by extensive regulation, and the southern Democrats had the same conviction about the southern way of life [i.e., segregation]."); Michael E. Gold, Griggs' Folly: An Essay on the Theory, Problems, and Origin of the Adverse Impact Definition of Employment Discriminationand a Recommendation for Reform, 7 INDUS.
    [Show full text]
  • Inductions, Red Herrings, and the Best Explanation for the Mixed Record of Science
    University at Albany, State University of New York Scholars Archive Philosophy Faculty Scholarship Philosophy 6-2010 Inductions, red herrings, and the best explanation for the mixed record of science P.D. Magnus University at Albany, State University of New York, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cas_philosophy_scholar Part of the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Magnus, P.D., "Inductions, red herrings, and the best explanation for the mixed record of science" (2010). Philosophy Faculty Scholarship. 49. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cas_philosophy_scholar/49 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at Scholars Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholars Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Inductions, red herrings, and the best explanation for the mixed record of science P.D. Magnus∗ December 22, 2009 This is the author's final draft of a paper forthcoming The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. e-mail: pmagnus(at)fecundity.com web: http://www.fecundity.com/job Abstract Kyle Stanford has recently claimed to offer a new challenge to sci- entific realism. Taking his inspiration from the familiar Pessimistic In- duction (PI), Stanford proposes a New Induction (NI). Contra Anjan Chakravartty's suggestion that the NI is a \red herring", I argue that it reveals something deep and important about science. The Problem of Unconceived Alternatives, which lies at the heart of the NI, yields a richer anti-realism than the PI. It explains why science falls short when it falls short, and so it might figure in the most coherent account of scientific practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Anticipatory Anxiety and Wishful Thinking
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Engelmann, Jan; Lebreton, Maël; Schwardmann, Peter; van der Weele, Joël J.; Chang, Li-Ang Working Paper Anticipatory Anxiety and Wishful Thinking Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. TI 2019-042/I Provided in Cooperation with: Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam and Rotterdam Suggested Citation: Engelmann, Jan; Lebreton, Maël; Schwardmann, Peter; van der Weele, Joël J.; Chang, Li-Ang (2019) : Anticipatory Anxiety and Wishful Thinking, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. TI 2019-042/I, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam and Rotterdam This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/205332 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Study of Tense, Aspect, and Modality in Diglossic Speech in Cairene Arabic
    CORPUS STUDY OF TENSE, ASPECT, AND MODALITY IN DIGLOSSIC SPEECH IN CAIRENE ARABIC BY OLA AHMED MOSHREF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2012 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Elabbas Benmamoun, Chair Professor Eyamba Bokamba Professor Rakesh M. Bhatt Assistant Professor Marina Terkourafi ABSTRACT Morpho-syntactic features of Modern Standard Arabic mix intricately with those of Egyptian Colloquial Arabic in ordinary speech. I study the lexical, phonological and syntactic features of verb phrase morphemes and constituents in different tenses, aspects, moods. A corpus of over 3000 phrases was collected from religious, political/economic and sports interviews on four Egyptian satellite TV channels. The computational analysis of the data shows that systematic and content morphemes from both varieties of Arabic combine in principled ways. Syntactic considerations play a critical role with regard to the frequency and direction of code-switching between the negative marker, subject, or complement on one hand and the verb on the other. Morph-syntactic constraints regulate different types of discourse but more formal topics may exhibit more mixing between Colloquial aspect or future markers and Standard verbs. ii To the One Arab Dream that will come true inshaa’ Allah! عربية أنا.. أميت دمها خري الدماء.. كما يقول أيب الشاعر العراقي: بدر شاكر السياب Arab I am.. My nation’s blood is the finest.. As my father says Iraqi Poet: Badr Shaker Elsayyab iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I’m sincerely thankful to my advisor Prof. Elabbas Benmamoun, who during the six years of my study at UIUC was always kind, caring and supportive on the personal and academic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • First-Person Participation in Dante's Commedia Katherine Lucy
    First-Person Participation in Dante’s Commedia Katherine Lucy Powlesland Pembroke College August 2018 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. i Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ iii Abbreviations, Editions, and Translations ............................................................................................. iv Preface ................................................................................................................................................... vi Chapter 1: Reading Interactively ............................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Narratological approaches to the Commedia .............................................................................. 12 1.2 Bernard’s interaction manquée ................................................................................................... 17 1.3 Focal view switching .................................................................................................................. 22 1.4 Bernard’s object .......................................................................................................................... 27 1.5 Bernard’s double frame violation ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wishful Thinking Final
    A Framework for Understanding Wishful Thinking Daniel J. Hicks Science and Technology Policy Fellowships American Association for the Advancement of Science [email protected] Kevin C. Elliott Department of Philosophy Michigan State University [email protected] Abstract While the science and values literature has seen recurrent concerns about wishful thinking, there have been few efforts to characterize this phenomenon. Based on a review of varieties of wishful thinking involved in climate skepticism, we argue that instances of wishful thinking can be fruitfully characterized in terms of the mechanisms that generate them and the problems associated with them. We highlight the array of mechanisms associated with wishful thinking, as well as the fact that it can be evaluated both from epistemic and ethical perspectives. We argue that it is doubtful that a single unified definition of wishful thinking can be developed. Moreover, the concept of wishful thinking can problematically focus excessive attention on individual and epistemic problems in science, to the exclusion of social and ethical problems. A Framework for Understanding Wishful Thinking 1. Introduction In the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, a generation of feminist philosophers of science and epistemologists produced a series of critiques of the ideal of value-free science — the view that non-epistemic values have no legitimate role to play in evaluating scientific hypotheses. In the 1990s, a number of critics put forward countercharges, defenses of the value-free ideal. Wishful thinking and cognate concepts were prominent in these countercharges. As Elisabeth Lloyd noted at the time, "There are several interrelated pronouncements that materialize with mystifying but strict regularity whenever 'feminism' and 'science' are used in the same breath.
    [Show full text]
  • 35. Logic: Common Fallacies Steve Miller Kennesaw State University, [email protected]
    Kennesaw State University DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University Sexy Technical Communications Open Educational Resources 3-1-2016 35. Logic: Common Fallacies Steve Miller Kennesaw State University, [email protected] Cherie Miller Kennesaw State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/oertechcomm Part of the Technical and Professional Writing Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Steve and Miller, Cherie, "35. Logic: Common Fallacies" (2016). Sexy Technical Communications. 35. http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/oertechcomm/35 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources at DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sexy Technical Communications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Logic: Common Fallacies Steve and Cherie Miller Sexy Technical Communication Home Logic and Logical Fallacies Taken with kind permission from the book Why Brilliant People Believe Nonsense by J. Steve Miller and Cherie K. Miller Brilliant People Believe Nonsense [because]... They Fall for Common Fallacies The dull mind, once arriving at an inference that flatters the desire, is rarely able to retain the impression that the notion from which the inference started was purely problematic. ― George Eliot, in Silas Marner In the last chapter we discussed passages where bright individuals with PhDs violated common fallacies. Even the brightest among us fall for them. As a result, we should be ever vigilant to keep our critical guard up, looking for fallacious reasoning in lectures, reading, viewing, and especially in our own writing. None of us are immune to falling for fallacies.
    [Show full text]