DOCSLIB.ORG

Iron County Land & Water Resource Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iron County Land & Water Resource Management Plan IRON COUNTY LAND & WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN March, 2020 Iron County Land & Water Conservation Department 607 3rd Ave North Hurley, WI 54534 Iron County Land and Water Resource Management Plan MARCH 2020 Acknowledgements Iron County Land Conservation Committee Chairman……………………………………….Vacant Vice Chairman…………………………………William Thomas County Board Chairman……………………...Joseph Pinardi Member…………………………………………Kenneth Saari Jr. Member…………………………………………Larry Youngs Farm Service Agency Representative……….Dale Wehmas Iron County Land and Water Conservation Department County Conservationist………………………Heather Palmquist Conservation Specialist...…………………..…Zach Wilson Other Cooperating Agencies Iron County Forestry and Parks Department Iron County Health Department Iron County Land Information Committee Iron County Land and Zoning Department Iron County University of Wisconsin-Madison Extension Natural Resource Conservation Service Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Local Advisory Committee Members Meta Brandt – Lake Association Member Joan Elias – Concerned Citizen Zach Lawson - WDNR Fisheries Biologist Jenna Malinowski – WDNR Wildlife Biologist Diane O’Krongly – Hurley Science Teacher Eric Peterson – Iron County Forestry Administrator Erika Roeder – Iron County Zoning Administrator Kenneth Saari Jr. – Land Conservation Committee Member Michael Shouldice – Lake Association Member Catherine Techtmann – University of Wisconsin–Madison Extension William Thomas – Land Conservation Committee Vice Chair Dale Wehmas – Land Conservation Committee Member/FSA Representative Plan Development Northwest Regional Planning Commission Cover Photograph Iron County Land and Water Conservation Department i Table of Contents IRON COUNTY LAND AND WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN .......................................... VI INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................VI PLAN ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................................................VI PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ......................................................................................................................................... VII Local Advisory Committee ................................................................................................................................. vii RESOURCE ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................................................ VII General Description ............................................................................................................................................ vii Groundwater ...................................................................................................................................................... vii Surface Water ..................................................................................................................................................... vii Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................................ viii Population and Housing ................................................................................................................................... viii Woodlands ......................................................................................................................................................... viii Recreation ............................................................................................................................................................ ix Agriculture .......................................................................................................................................................... ix SOIL AND WATER RESOURCE REGULATIONS .......................................................................................................... X GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................................................... X Summary of the Work Plan .................................................................................................................................. x Plan Goals ............................................................................................................................................................ x PLAN IMPLEMENTATION .......................................................................................................................................... X Land and Water Quality Initiatives Implementation ........................................................................................... x Performance Standards and Prohibitions Implementation................................................................................... x Priority Areas ...................................................................................................................................................... xi Partner Strategy .................................................................................................................................................. xi Education Strategy .............................................................................................................................................. xi Water Quality Monitoring .................................................................................................................................. xi Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................................... xi BUDGET AND FUNDING ........................................................................................................................................... XI CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................................... XII CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Local Advisory Committee ................................................................................................................................... 1 PLAN REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 2 CHAPTER 2. RESOURCE ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................... 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................................... 3 CLIMATE ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 TOPOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 BEDROCK GEOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................. 4 METALLIC AND NONMETALLIC MINERALS ............................................................................................................ 4 GLACIAL GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................................................................................................... 4 SOIL EROSION ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 GROUNDWATER ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 SURFACE WATER .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Nonpoint Source Pollution ................................................................................................................................. 10 WATERSHEDS ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 Watershed Basin Characteristics ........................................................................................................................ 10 LAKE SUPERIOR ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 COASTAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Coastal Erosion ..................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National List of Beaches 2008
    National List of Beaches September 2008 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-08-004 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama........................................................................................................................................... 3 Alaska .............................................................................................................................................. 5 California.......................................................................................................................................... 6 Connecticut .................................................................................................................................... 15 Delaware........................................................................................................................................ 17 Florida ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Georgia .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Hawaii ............................................................................................................................................ 33 Illinois ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of the SPAWNING and NURSERY AREAS of GREAT LAKES FISHES Volume II - Lake Superior
    Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-82/52 SEPTEMBER 1982 ATLAS OF THE SPAWNING AND NURSERY AREAS OF GREAT LAKES FISHES Volume II - Lake Superior Great Lake - St. Lawrence Seaway Navigation Season Extension Program Fish and Wildlife Service Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of the Army The Biological Services Program was established within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to supply scientific information and methodologies on key environmental issues that Impact fish and wildlife resources and their supporting ecosystems. The mission of the program is as follows: o To strengthen the Fish and Wildlife Service in its role as a primary source of information on national fish and wild- life resources, particularly in respect to environmental impact assessment. o To gather, analyze, and present information that will aid decisionmakers in the identification and resolution of problems associated with major changes in land and water use. o To provide better ecological information and evaluation for Department of the Interior development programs, such as those relatfng to energy development. Information developed by the Biological Services Program is intended for use in the planning and decisionmaking process to prevent or minimize the impact of development on fish and wildlife. Research activities and technlcal assistance services are based on an analysis of the issues, a determination of the decisionmakers involved and their informatlon needs, and an evaluation of the state of the art to identify information gaps and to determine priorities. This is a strategy that will ensure that the products produced and disseminated are timely and useful.
    [Show full text]
  • AR 1904 Part 1
    REPORT PART I. THE PREORDOVICIAN OF THE BY STATE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A. C. LANE AND A. E. SEAMAN OF MICHIGAN REVISED AND ENLARGED FROM AN ARTICLE IN THE JOURNAL FOR THE YEAR 1908 OF GEOLOGY, VOL. XV, NO. 7, OCT.-NOV., 1907. GEOLOGY INTRODUCTION. ALFRED C. LANE STATE GEOLOGIST It is not as easy to summarize the section of Michigan as, for instance, a compact state like Iowa. For one MAY 18, 1910 thing the state is so spread out that, turned around by its southeast corner on the map, it would reach beyond BY AUTHORITY New York into the Atlantic Ocean, and turned around by LANSING, MICHIGAN its northwest corner, would extend to Hudson's Bay and WYNKOOP HALLENBECK CRAWFORD CO., STATE PRINTERS into the Dakotas. Again it includes within its borders 1909 representatives of probably the oldest land masses, NOTES which have been frequently, if not continuously, above ON THE sea level ever since they were first elevated. The GEOLOGICAL SECTION geological succession may therefore be expected to be interspersed with beds laid down on land and in lakes OF MICHIGAN fresh and salt, and seas like the Caspian and Black, by FOR stream and wind, as well as wave. GEOLOGISTS, TEACHERS AND DRILLERS Part I includes the pre-Trenton rocks which even the drill has not reached in the Lower Peninsula. Contents In preparing these notes the state geologist had assistance from Professor Seaman of the College of PART I. THE PREORDOVICIAN..................................... 1 Mines as to the older rocks to such an extent that it may PART II.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents ARTICLE I
    Table of Contents ARTICLE I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 9.1.1 AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE ........................................................................................... 1 SECTION 9.1.2 MUNICIPALITIES AND STATE AGENCIES REGULATED. ................................................. 1 SECTION 9.1.3 ABROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS. ............................................................... 1 SECTION 9.1.4 FORCE AND EFFECT ..................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 9.1.5 INTERPRETATION. ........................................................................................................ 2 SECTION 9.1.6 DEFINITIONS. ............................................................................................................... 2 ARTICLE II. ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................ 7 SECTION 9.2.1 COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. ............................................................................. 7 SECTION 9.2.2 LAND USE PERMITS. .................................................................................................... 7 SECTION 9.2.3 VIOLATIONS. ................................................................................................................ 8 ARTICLE III. ZONING DISTRICTS .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Beaches
    Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Alaska .............................................................................................................................................. 5 California .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Connecticut .................................................................................................................................... 16 Delaware ........................................................................................................................................ 18 Florida ............................................................................................................................................ 19 Georgia .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Hawaii ............................................................................................................................................ 33 Illinois ............................................................................................................................................. 41 Indiana ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OF by Donald R. Winter
    WATER QUALITY AND TROPHIC CONDITION OF LAKE SUPERIOR (WISCONSIN WATERS) Department of Natural By Resources Donald R. Winter Madison, Wis. 1971 AGkNOWLED6MENTS I first wish to thank the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for making this study possible. Those vi thin the Depart­ ment to whcm I owe my gratitude include Mr. Lloyd A. Lueschov, Chief, Laboratory Services Section, Division of Environmental Protection, for his suggestions in this stuay; Mr . Orville Weberg, Conservation Warden, who navigated the research vessel in open waters; Mr. Dan Ryan , District Water Pollution Biologist, who assisted me vith the field work; and to the Department chemists who performed many of the chemical analyses. I especially wish to thank Professor J. Magnuson or the University of Wisconsin Department of Zoology and Dr . H. F. Henderson formerly of the University of Wisconsin Department of Zoology , for their guidance in this research project and their thoughtfulness during the course of my graduate studies. The author vas a Water Pollution Biologist in the Bureau of Standard.e and Surveys , Madison, and is nov Administrative Assistant in the Bureau of Air Pollution and Solid Waste Disposal. Edited by Ruth L. Hine GONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION 3 DESIGN AND METHODS 4 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CONDITIONS 4 Dissolved Oxygen 4 Nutrients 8 Transparency 10 Bottom Sediments 10 BIOTIC CONDITIONS 10 Benthos 10 Seston 12 Cladophora 12 Fish Net Slimes 14 POTENTIAL POLLUTION SOURCES 14 Superior Fiber Products, Inc. 14 E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company 14 American Can Company 15 Reserve Mining Company 18 CONCLUSIONS 19 APPENDIX 26 REFERENCES INTRODUGTION Lake Superior is a great The surface area is 82,360 square in Table 1 with their respective asset to northern Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Explore Northern Iron County Backyard Adventure Month.Pdf
    EXPLORE NORTHERN IRON COUNTY BACKYARD ADVENTURE MONTH SEPTEMBER, 2020 15 NATURAL AND HISTORICAL LOCATIONS—COOL PRIZES—FAMILY FRIENDLY FUN Download and print your booklet at: www.nicer715.com or www.iron.extension.wisc.edu Or call 715-561-2695 to request one. EXPLORE NORTHERN IRON COUNTY BACKYARD ADVENTURE MONTH Northern Iron County is filled with many unique natural and historical locations that you can visit, right in our own back yards! Whether you are a local or someone visiting our area, we invite you to check out the 15 locations listed in this booklet throughout the whole month of September for your chance to win some really cool prizes! Each location, listed in full detail on the following pages, is ranked by a point system. This point system is based on the travel and trail difficulty of each location. • Travel difficulty: determined by considering miles to destination, condition of road, parking. • Trail difficulty: determined by considering the length and condition of trail. Use the check list on the back page to keep track of your adventures throughout the month of September. We’ve added an extra adventure points section, just for fun! In order to qualify for prizes, participants are required to submit completed checklists and photos from each destination, online at https://tinyurl.com/ironcountybackyardadventure or via email at [email protected]. Deadline to submit: SEPTEMBER 30th! Before participating, please read the disclaimer and photo release on the back page. PRIZES 1st and 2nd prize payouts are awarded to participants who submit checklists with the most points and one photo from each destination (15 total).
    [Show full text]
  • FERC Pre-Application Document
    Preliminary Application Document Superior Falls Project FERC Project No. 2587 Saxon Falls Project FERC Project No. 2610 Montreal River, Iron County, Wisconsin and Gogebic County, Michigan Submitted by Northern States Power Company Eau Claire, Wisconsin Report prepared by www.meadhunt.com This page is intentionally left blank Preliminary Application Document FERC Project Nos. 2610 and 2587 Saxon Falls and Superior Falls Hydroelectric Projects Iron County, WI and Gogebic County, MI Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Authorized Agents (18 CFR § 5.6(d)(2)(i)) ................................................................... 3 1.2 PAD Content ................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 References ................................................................................................................... 3 2. Process Plan and Schedule (18 CFR § 5.6(d)(1)).................................................................. 4 2.1 Process Plan and Schedule Through Filing of License Application ............................. 4 2.2 Proposed Communications Protocols .......................................................................... 7 2.2.1 General Communications ................................................................................ 7 2.2.2 Meetings .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nonesuch Formation, Western Lake Superior Region, Midcontin
    PETROGRAPHY AND SEDIMENTATION OF THE MIDDLE PROTEROZOIC (KEWEENAWAN) NONESUCH FORMATION, WESTERN LAKE SUPERIOR REGION, MIDCONTINENT RIFT SYSTEM A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY THOMAS JOHN SUSZEK IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE JUNE, 1991 DEDICATED TO MY WIFE THERESE, AND MY DAUGHTERS ANDREA AND STEPHANIE ... THEY MADE IT ALL WORTHWHILE ABSTRACT Detailed sedimentological descriptions and petrographic analysis of the upper Keweenawan Nonesuch Formation was accomplished for selected Bear Creek drill cores (drilled in 1958, 1959 and 1960) from Ashland, Bayfield, and Douglas Counties, Wisconsin. These data, coupled with the information from outcrops in northwest Wisconsin and upper Michigan, provide evidence on source rocks, environment of deposition, and the tectonic framework of the Nonesuch Formation in the Midcontinent Rift System. Lower Keweenawan felsic, intermediate and mafic volcanic units were the major contributors of detritus to the formation. Middle Keweenawan volcanic and granitic intrusive rocks were minor sources. Detritus from Early Proterozoic and Archean crystalline rocks increases in abundance upsection as older source rocks outside the rift were unroofed. Sedimentary structures and stratigraphic facies relationships suggest that deltaic processes, sheetfloods, density and turbidity currents, and suspension settling were the primary mechanisms of deposition in a thermally stratified perennial lake. Rapid fluctuations in water levels were brought on by changes in tectonism and/or climate. The gradational contacts of the Nonesuch Formation with the underlying Copper Harbor Formation and the i overlying Freda Formation, along with outcrop and drill core facies data, suggest that the site of Nonesuch deposition was adjacent to, and sometimes upon, a prograding alluvial fan complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisions of Stratigraphic Nomenclature Within the Keweenawan Supergroup of Northern Michigan
    Revisions of Stratigraphic Nomenclature within the Keweenawan Supergroup of Northern Michigan Geochemistry, Petrography, and Volcanology of Rhyolites of the Portage Lake Volcanics, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1970-A,B AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in th current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geologic^ Survey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publication that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Pric and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updatei monthly, which is for sale in microfiche from U.S. Geological Survey Book and Open-File Report Sales, Box 25425, Denver, C( 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over th( Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications counter at the following U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 14-Bad-Montreal Regional Plan
    Lake Superior Biodiversity Conservation Strategy: Final Regional Plans, September 2015 14. Bad-Montreal Bad - Montreal The Bad-Montreal region extends along the shore east This is one of twenty of Ashland, Wisconsin, to the Regional Plans that mouth of the Montreal support implementation River, and encompasses the of the Lake Superior state boundary line between Biodiversity Conservation Wisconsin and Michigan. Strategy (Strategy). The Most of the reservation of Strategy, prepared and the Bad River Band of Lake overseen by the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Superior Partnership, Indians is located in this regional unit. The 25-mile Penokee-Gogebic Range is found in this area. The Penokee Range has extensive forests contains information and and unusual features, including high-gradient soft headwater streams 62 sub-strategies to and glades of open bedrock, and holds a substantial undeveloped ore provide guidance to deposit. Natural cover in the coastal zone of the Bad-Montreal restoring and protecting regional unit is over 96%, primarily as forest, with some agricultural biodiversity lands. (www.natureconservancy .ca/superiorbca). Over 45% of the coastal zone in this region is in coastal wetlands. Of Regional Plans are particular interest is the Kakagon and Bad River Sloughs, a Ramsar intended to be adaptive Wetland of International Importance. This area is the largest documents which freshwater estuary remaining on Lake Superior and is an important support and respond to spawning region; it provides exceptional habitat for a variety of local conservation efforts aquatic and wetland species and contains the largest wild rice bed on and contribute to Lake Superior. At least 145 species and communities of conservation concern have been documented in this regional unit, including Piping lakewide biodiversity 1,2 goals.
    [Show full text]