DOCSLIB.ORG

Linaria Vulgaris ) Resulting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Linaria Vulgaris ) Resulting INVASIVENESS OF YELLOW TOADFLAX ( LINARIA VULGARIS ) RESULTING FROM DISTURBANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS by Erik Adam Lehnhoff A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology and Environmental Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April 2008 © COPYRIGHT by Erik Adam Lehnhoff 2008 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a dissertation submitted by Erik Adam Lehnhoff This dissertation has been read by each member of the dissertation committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citations, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the Division of Graduate Education. Dr. Lisa J. Rew Approved for the Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences Dr. Jon Wraith Approved for the Division of Graduate Education Dr. Carl A. Fox iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a doctoral degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. I further agree that copying of this dissertation is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for extensive copying or reproduction of this dissertation should be referred to ProQuest Information and Learning, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106, to whom I have granted “the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute my dissertation in and from microform along with the non- exclusive right to reproduce and distribute my abstract in any format in whole or in part.” Erik Adam Lehnhoff April 2008 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe endless gratitude to Dr. Lisa Rew for her support on all phases of this dissertation including project establishment, experimental design, data analysis, and editing and polishing the final document. Dr. Bruce Maxwell has been a source of inspiration, and from him I have learned to never stop asking questions about the systems in which we work and to seek new ways of understanding them through empirical models. I am also grateful for the support of Drs. Cliff Montagne, Cathy Zabinski and Steve Sutherland for their input on the research and this dissertation, and Dr. Mark Taper for assistance with statistical analysis and programming in R. I thank Susan Lamont and her crew from the Gallatin National Forest, Hebgen Lake Ranger District for assistance with locating suitable research sites and with burning select plots. I also thank Marie Jasieniuk and Charles Repath for the use of data from their prior experiment. Other data were collected with the help of numerous friends and colleagues, including Tim Seipel, Karin Neff, Brad Bauer, Tyler Brummer, Frank Dougher, Fred Pollnac, Brenda Sanchez, Jerad Corbin and Amanda Morrison. Additional gratitude is expressed to Tim for lending his expertise in plant identification and to Frank for solving all of my computer problems and providing GIS support. The Montana State University Big Sky Institute, the Center for Invasive Plant Management and the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory are gratefully acknowledged for providing funding. Finally, I would like to thank my family. I am forever indebted to my parents for instilling within me a deep appreciation of, and interest in, the natural world, and for supporting my academic pursuits. To my wife, Kris Evans, I owe eternal gratitude for the endless love and support she has provided throughout the past five years. v TABLE OF CONTENTS PROLOGUE: A SHIFT TOWARD ECOLOGICAL BASED MANAGEMENT OF NON-INDIGENOUS PLANT SPECIES ................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE ...............................................5 Introduction....................................................................................................................5 Plant Invasions...............................................................................................................7 Community Assembly Theory..............................................................................8 Niche Assembly Theory ..............................................................................9 Dispersal Assembly Theory.......................................................................10 Unified Neutral Theory..............................................................................10 Competition Theory...................................................................................11 Disturbance ................................................................................................12 Other Factors Shaping Plant Community ..................................................13 Plant Invasion Theory.........................................................................................13 Impacts of NIS ....................................................................................................17 Impact of Weed Management.............................................................................20 Linaria vulgaris ...........................................................................................................20 Origin and Distribution.......................................................................................21 Reason for Concern.............................................................................................22 Historical and Beneficial Uses............................................................................23 Habitat.................................................................................................................24 Morphology.........................................................................................................24 Comparison and Possible Hybridization with Linaria dalmatica ......................25 Floral Biology and Seed Production...................................................................26 Seed Dispersal.....................................................................................................26 Germination and Seedling Establishment...........................................................27 Vegetative Reproduction ....................................................................................27 Phenology ...........................................................................................................29 Invasive Potential................................................................................................30 Impacts................................................................................................................31 Ecological ..................................................................................................31 Economic ...................................................................................................31 Response to Disturbance.....................................................................................33 Fire .............................................................................................................33 Soil Disturbance.........................................................................................34 Grazing.......................................................................................................34 Management.................................................................................................................35 Biological...................................................................................................35 Chemical ....................................................................................................38 Physical/Mechanical/Cultural.............................................................................39 Fire .............................................................................................................41 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS – CONTINUED Grazing.......................................................................................................41 Integrated Management .............................................................................41 Primary Objectives of Research...................................................................................42 Objective 1: Effects of Size of Soil Disturbance and Propagule Pressure On L. vulgaris Colonization.......................................................................43 Objective 2: Population Dynamics and Invasiveness ........................................44 Objective 3: Effects of Disturbance and Habitat on L. vulgaris Population Invasiveness.............................................................................46 Objective 4: Impacts of Disturbance and L. vulgaris on Native Vegetation .....46 2. EFFECTS OF DISTURBANCE SIZE AND PROPAGULE PRESSURE ON LINARIA VULGARIS COLONIZATION SUCCESS..................................48 Introduction..................................................................................................................48 Materials and Methods.................................................................................................50 Site Descriptions .................................................................................................50 Clearcut Sites .............................................................................................51 Wildfire Site...............................................................................................52
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon City Nuisance Plant List
    Nuisance Plant List City of Oregon City 320 Warner Milne Road , P.O. Box 3040, Oregon City, OR 97045 Phone: (503) 657-0891, Fax: (503) 657-7892 Scientific Name Common Name Acer platanoides Norway Maple Acroptilon repens Russian knapweed Aegopodium podagraria and variegated varieties Goutweed Agropyron repens Quack grass Ailanthus altissima Tree-of-heaven Alliaria officinalis Garlic Mustard Alopecuris pratensis Meadow foxtail Anthoxanthum odoratum Sweet vernalgrass Arctium minus Common burdock Arrhenatherum elatius Tall oatgrass Bambusa sp. Bamboo Betula pendula lacinata Cutleaf birch Brachypodium sylvaticum False brome Bromus diandrus Ripgut Bromus hordeaceus Soft brome Bromus inermis Smooth brome-grasses Bromus japonicus Japanese brome-grass Bromus sterilis Poverty grass Bromus tectorum Cheatgrass Buddleia davidii (except cultivars and varieties) Butterfly bush Callitriche stagnalis Pond water starwort Cardaria draba Hoary cress Carduus acanthoides Plumeless thistle Carduus nutans Musk thistle Carduus pycnocephalus Italian thistle Carduus tenufolius Slender flowered thistle Centaurea biebersteinii Spotted knapweed Centaurea diffusa Diffuse knapweed Centaurea jacea Brown knapweed Centaurea pratensis Meadow knapweed Chelidonium majou Lesser Celandine Chicorum intybus Chicory Chondrilla juncea Rush skeletonweed Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle Cirsium vulgare Common Thistle Clematis ligusticifolia Western Clematis Clematis vitalba Traveler’s Joy Conium maculatum Poison-hemlock Convolvulus arvensis Field Morning-glory 1 Nuisance Plant List
    [Show full text]
  • Milk Thistle
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control BIOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF EXOTIC T RU E T HISTL E S RACHEL WINSTON , RICH HANSEN , MA R K SCH W A R ZLÄNDE R , ER IC COO M BS , CA R OL BELL RANDALL , AND RODNEY LY M FHTET-2007-05 U.S. Department Forest September 2008 of Agriculture Service FHTET he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 Tby the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ On the cover: Italian thistle. Photo: ©Saint Mary’s College of California. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for information only and does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FR Doc 2010-27740
    Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 213 / Thursday, November 4, 2010 / Proposed Rules 67925 TABLE 1—WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES—Continued Facility Address Waste description 5. Reopener Language—(A) If, anytime after disposal of the delisted waste, Owosso pos- sesses or is otherwise made aware of any data (including but not limited to leachate data or groundwater monitoring data) relevant to the delisted waste indicating that any con- stituent is at a concentration in the leachate higher than the specified delisting concentra- tion, or is in the groundwater at a concentration higher than the maximum allowable groundwater concentration in paragraph (1), then Owosso must report such data, in writing, to the Regional Administrator within 10 days of first possessing or being made aware of that data. (B) Based on the information described in paragraph (A) and any other informa- tion received from any source, the Regional Administrator will make a preliminary deter- mination as to whether the reported information requires Agency action to protect human health or the environment. Further action may include suspending, or revoking the exclu- sion, or other appropriate response necessary to protect human health and the environ- ment. (C) If the Regional Administrator determines that the reported information does re- quire Agency action, the Regional Administrator will notify Owosso in writing of the actions the Regional Administrator believes are necessary to protect human health and the envi- ronment. The notice shall include a statement of the proposed action and a statement pro- viding Owosso with an opportunity to present information as to why the proposed Agency action is not necessary or to suggest an alternative action.
    [Show full text]
  • 90-Day Finding on a Petition to Delist the Sacramento
    Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 5, 2006 / Proposed Rules 70479 part of the vehicle; these items are not amend the standards prior to the DATES: The finding in this document necessarily located in the rear cargo completion of this research would be was made on December 5, 2006. To be area. A ‘‘seat performance failure’’ premature. Additionally, other areas of considered in the 5-year review, includes seat hardware failure, seat concern identified by the petitioners comments and information should be deformed by intrusion or occupant would require substantial research to submitted to us (see ADDRESSES section) impact or other failure mechanism. We address. While the agency may in the on or before March 5, 2007. However, identified one case where an AIS 3+ future consider adding additional we will continue to accept new injury was reported from contact with dummies or unrestrained cargo to its information about any listed species at ‘‘interior loose objects’’ and there was a frontal crash test and/or other programs, any time. ‘‘seat performance failure.’’ We then it is not appropriate to consider ADDRESSES: Data, comments, manually reviewed the individual case rulemaking at this time. In accordance 5 information, or questions concerning file for accuracy in the reporting and with 49 CFR part 552, this completes this petition finding and 5-year review relevancy to the frontal crash test the agency’s review of the petition. should be submitted to the Field procedure proposed. After a careful Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115, Supervisor, New Mexico Ecological review of the relevant case file, it was 30117 and 30162; delegation of authority at Services Field Office, 2105 Osuna Road concluded that this was not an incident 49 CFR 1.50.
    [Show full text]
  • (Linaria Vulgaris) and Dalmatian Toadflax (Linaria
    DISSERTATION VIABILITY AND INVASIVE POTENTIAL OF HYBRIDS BETWEEN YELLOW TOADFLAX (LINARIA VULGARIS) AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX (LINARIA DALMATICA) Submitted by Marie F.S. Turner Department of Soil and Crop Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2012 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Sarah Ward Christopher Richards David Steingraeber George Beck Sharlene Sing Copyright by Marie Frances Sundem Turner 2012 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT VIABILITY AND INVASIVE POTENTIAL OF HYBRIDS BETWEEN YELLOW TOADFLAX (LINARIA VULGARIS) AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX (LINARIA DALMATICA) Although outcomes of hybridization are highly variable, it is now considered to play an important role in evolution, speciation, and invasion. Hybridization has recently been confirmed between populations of yellow (or common) toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) and Dalmatian toadflax (Linaria dalmatica) in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States. The presence of hybrid toadflax populations on public lands is of concern, as both parents are aggressive invaders already listed as noxious weeds in multiple western states. A common garden experiment was designed to measure differences in quantitative (shoot length, biomass, flowering stems, seed capsule production) phenological (time of emergence, first flowering and seed maturity) and ecophysiological (photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency (WUE)) traits for yellow and Dalmatian toadflax, F1 and BC1 hybrids, as well as natural field-collected hybrids from two sites. Genotypes were cloned to produce true replicates and the entire common garden was also replicated at two locations (Colorado and Montana); physiological data were collected only in Colorado. All genotypes grew larger and were more reproductively active in Colorado than in Montana, and hybrids outperformed parent taxa across vegetative and reproductive traits indicating heterosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution, Biogeography and Systematics of the Genus Cymbalaria Hill Evolució, Biogeografia I Sistemàtica Del Gènere Cymbalaria Hill Ph.D
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Evolution, biogeography and systematics of the genus Cymbalaria Hill Evolució, biogeografia i sistemàtica del gènere Cymbalaria Hill Ph.D. Thesis Pau Carnicero Campmany Unitat de Botànica Departament de Biologia Animal, Biolo- gia Vegetal i Ecologia Facultat de Biociències Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Evolution, biogeography and systematics of the genus Cymbalaria Hill Ph.D. Thesis Pau Carnicero Campmany Bellaterra, 2017 Programa de doctorat en Ecologia Terrestre Unitat de Botànica Departament de Biologia Animal, Biolo- gia Vegetal i Ecologia Facultat de Biociències Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Evolution, biogeography and systematics of the genus Cymbalaria Hill Memòria presentada per: Pau Carnicero Campmany per optar al grau de Doctor amb el vist-i-plau dels directors de tesi: Dra. Mercè Galbany Casals Dr. Llorenç Sáez Gonyalons (Directora i Tutora acadèmica) Unitat de Botànica Unitat de Botànica Departament de Biologia Departament de Biologia Animal, Vegetal i Ecologia Animal, Vegetal i Ecologia Facultat de Biociències Facultat de Biociències Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Dra. Núria Garcia Jacas Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB-CSIC-ICUB) Programa de doctorat en Ecologia Terrestre “When on board of H.
    [Show full text]
  • Micromorphological and Histochemical Attributes of Flowers and Floral Reward in Linaria Vulgaris (Plantaginaceae)
    Protoplasma https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-018-1269-2 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Micromorphological and histochemical attributes of flowers and floral reward in Linaria vulgaris (Plantaginaceae) Jacek Jachuła1 & Agata Konarska1 & Bożena Denisow1 Received: 21 February 2018 /Accepted: 23 May 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract The self-incompatible flowers of Linaria vulgaris have developed a range of mechanisms for attraction of insect visitors/ pollinators and deterrence of ineffective pollinators and herbivores. These adaptive traits include the flower size and symmetry, the presence of a spur as a Bsecondary nectar presenter,^ olfactory (secondary metabolites) and sensual (scent, flower color, nectar guide—contrasting palate) signals, and floral rewards, i.e. pollen and nectar. Histochemical tests revealed that the floral glandular trichomes produced essential oils and flavonoids, and pollen grains contained flavonoids, terpenoids, and steroids, which play a role of olfactory attractants/repellents. The nectary gland is disc-shaped and located at the base of the ovary. Nectar is secreted through numerous modified stomata. Nectar secretion began in the bud stage and lasted to the end of anthesis. The amount of produced nectar depended on the flower age and ranged from 0.21 to 3.95 mg/flower (mean = 1.51 mg). The concentration of sugars in the nectar reached up to 57.0%. Both the nectar amount and sugar concentration demonstrated a significant year and population effect. Pollen production was variable between the years of the study. On average, a single flower of L. vulgaris produced 0.31 mg of pollen. The spectrum of insect visitors in the flowers of L. vulgaris differed significantly between populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellow and Dalmatian Toadflax
    YELLOW AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX PNW135 PNW135 | Page 1 YELLOW AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX By Dale K. Whaley, Assistant Professor, Ag and Natural Resources, Washington State University Extension. Gary L. Piper, Emeritus Professor, Department of Entomology, Washington State University Abstract Yellow toadflax and Dalmatian toadflax are non-native plants that have become two of the most troublesome invasive weeds in North America. Infesting forests, range and grasslands, and other areas, these two weeds are very prevalent in the Pacific Northwest. This publication outlines the plants’ characteristics, variations, growth and reproduction, distribution and economic impact, as well as management strategies. Table of Contents Introduction 3 Identification 4 Variation 4 Growth and Reproduction 5 Distribution and Economic Impact 6 Management Strategies 7 Prevention, Early Detection, and Rapid Response 7 Cultural Control 8 Livestock Grazing for Control 8 Physical and Mechanical Control 9 Chemical Control 9 Biological Control 9 Maintenance 15 References 15 PNW135 | Page 2 PNW PUBLICATION | YELLOW AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX Yellow and Dalmatian Toadflax Introduction Dalmatian toadflax, Linaria dalmatica (L.) Mill. (Figure 1), and yellow toadflax, Linaria vulgaris Mill. (Figure 2), commonly referred to as “butter and eggs,” are two non-native plants that were introduced into North America as ornamentals from the Mediterranean region. Introduced by the 1800s, these two non-native plants have since escaped flower beds and have become two of the most troublesome invasive weeds infesting millions of acres across much of temperate North America. In the Pacific Northwest (defined here as Washington, Oregon, and Idaho) these plants can be found infesting forests, range and grassland, rights of way, lands put into conservation programs like the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), and other disturbed areas (Sing et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Evolution of Asterids!
    Diversity and Evolution of Asterids! . mints and snapdragons . ! *Boraginaceae - borage family! Widely distributed, large family of alternate leaved plants. Typically hairy. Typically possess helicoid or scorpiod cymes = compound monochasium. Many are poisonous or used medicinally. Mertensia virginica - Eastern bluebells *Boraginaceae - borage family! CA (5) CO (5) A 5 G (2) Gynobasic style; not terminal style which is usual in plants; this feature is shared with the mint family (Lamiaceae) which is not related Myosotis - forget me not 2 carpels each with 2 ovules are separated at maturity and each further separated into 1 ovuled compartments Fruit typically 4 nutlets *Boraginaceae - borage family! Echium vulgare Blueweed, viper’s bugloss adventive *Boraginaceae - borage family! Hackelia virginiana Beggar’s-lice Myosotis scorpioides Common forget-me-not *Boraginaceae - borage family! Lithospermum canescens Lithospermum incisium Hoary puccoon Fringed puccoon *Boraginaceae - borage family! pin thrum Lithospermum canescens • Lithospermum (puccoon) - classic Hoary puccoon dimorphic heterostyly *Boraginaceae - borage family! Mertensia virginica Eastern bluebells Botany 401 final field exam plant! *Boraginaceae - borage family! Leaves compound or lobed and “water-marked” Hydrophyllum virginianum - Common waterleaf Botany 401 final field exam plant! **Oleaceae - olive family! CA (4) CO (4) or 0 A 2 G (2) • Woody plants, opposite leaves • 4 merous actinomorphic or regular flowers Syringa vulgaris - Lilac cultivated **Oleaceae - olive family! CA (4)
    [Show full text]
  • GENETIC OBSERVATIONS on the GENUS LINARIA a Few Years Ago, I
    GENETIC OBSERVATIONS ON THE GENUS LINARIA E. M. EAST Harvard University, Bussey Institution, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts Received January 9, 1933 A few years ago, I obtained seeds from eighteen presumably different species of the genus Linaria-chiefly through the kindness of Professor Doctor E. BAURand of HAAGEund ScHMIm-in order to determine the value' of this group for genetical investigation. The list of species follows, together with some notes on their compatibility with each other. 1. L. bipartita Willd. Hab. northern Africa. Erect, branching, annual type. Fls. large, violet-purple, with orange palates above, becoming whitish toward the base. Spurs long and curved. Closely related to Nos. 7,9, 10, 14, and probably will cross with them and give fertile hybrids. No crosses were obtained when the plants were used as female with Nos. 3 (12 pol.) and 17 (16 pol.). 2. L. canadensis Dumont. Hab. New Brunswick, New England, and south to southwest. Slender, erect, annual. Lvs. linear. Fls. small, violet-blue to purple. Late flowering. No crosses tried because of this point. 3. L. Cymbalaria Mill. (Kenilworth ivy). Hab. Europe. Four types grown, received under the names vulgare (trailing), alba (trailing with white flowers), globosa (bushy), and compacta (bushy). A trailing, glabrous plant, with reniform-orbicular, 5-9 lobed leaves. Fls. small, axillary, of various shades of purple above and of yellow at the lip. Spurs short. No crosses Earlier, I have made similar surveys of other genera; but, as no especially interesting con- tributions to genetic knowledge resulted, the results were not putlished. I now believe that this decision was a mistake.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 BULL THISTLE (SPEAR THISTLE) PEST STATUS of WEED Nature Of
    In: Van Driesche, R., et al., 2002, Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States, USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04, 413 p. 19 BULL THISTLE (SPEAR THISTLE) L.-T. Kok1 and A. Gassmann2 1Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0319, USA; 2CABI Bioscience Centre Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland trast to those of Canada thistle. Leaves are covered PEST STATUS OF WEED with coarse hairs on the upper surface of the leaf Bull thistle, Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Tenore, is an in- blade, and are woolly below. Long spines extend from vasive thistle from Eurasia, found throughout the the leaf blade at the midrib and at each lobe. The leaf United States and in Canada from Newfoundland to bases extend downward on the stem forming long British Columbia. It is capable of invading fields, pas- wings. tures, wastelands and along roadsides, but will not Biology survive in cultivated fields. Bull thistle is a biennial species that reproduces by Nature of Damage seed. The root system consists of several primary Economic damage. Bull thistle occurs in overgrazed roots each with several smaller lateral roots. It does pastures, where heavy infestations can exclude live- not reproduce by vegetative means. Bull thistle is erect stock from infested areas. It also is common along and bushy in appearance, up to 2 m high, and has roadside and vacant fields. many spreading branches (Fig. 1). Stems are erect, Ecological damage. Although bull thistle is a stout, often branched, and hairy. Leaves are green on problem predominantly in disturbed areas, it also can the upper side, with woolly gray hairs on the under- be found in natural areas.
    [Show full text]