DOCSLIB.ORG

SOUTH NGURU MOUNTAINS: a Description of the Biophysical Landscape

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SOUTH NGURU MOUNTAINS: a Description of the Biophysical Landscape TANZANIA FOREST CONSERVATION GROUP TECHNICAL PAPER 11 SOUTH NGURU MOUNTAINS: a description of the biophysical landscape Nike Doggart and David Loserian (Ed.) 2007 Participatory Environmental Management Programme (PEMA) Suggested citation: Whole report Published by the Tanzania Forest Conservation Group © Tanzania Forest Conservation Group All rights reserved. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit the Tanzania Forest Conservation Group as the copyright owner. Doggart, N. and D. Loserian (eds.) (2007). South Nguru Mountains: A Description of the biophysical landscape. TFCG Technical Paper No 11. DSM Tz pp 1 – 71. Sections within the report: Kiure, J. & N. Doggart (2007). Birds of the South Nguru Mountains. In: Doggart, N. and D. Loserian (eds.) (2007). South Nguru Mountains: A Description of the biophysical landscape. TFCG Technical Paper No 11. DSM Tz pp 1 – 71. ISSN 0856-8618 ISBN 9987-8958-2-4 Key words: Biodiversity, endemic, South Nguru Mountains, Eastern Arc Mountains, Mvomero, Tanzania, Kanga Forest Reserve, Mkindo Forest Reserve. Front cover photographs (clockwise from top left): Callulina sp. nov. is one of the new species of amphibian recorded during the surveys. Photo by Michele Menegon, 2005. Charcoal harvested from woodland near Kanga. Photo by David Loserian 2005. Leopard caught on a camera trap in Kanga. View of the South Nguru landscape from Kanga F.R. Photo by Andrew Perkin. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................................ 6 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 ABOUT THE EASTERN ARC MOUNTAINS ....................................................................................................... 7 1.3 ABOUT THE SOUTH NGURU MOUNTAINS ...................................................................................................... 7 1.4 ABOUT THE PEMA PROGRAMME ................................................................................................................ 8 1.5 DEFINING KEY TERMS USED IN THE REPORT.................................................................................................. 8 2 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ................................................................................................................................ 10 2.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 10 2.2 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 RESULTS................................................................................................................................................. 10 2.4 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................ 10 3 HYDROLOGY................................................................................................................................................ 11 3.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 11 3.2 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................... 11 3.3 RESULTS................................................................................................................................................. 11 3.4 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................ 11 4 CLIMATE....................................................................................................................................................... 12 4.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 12 4.2 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................... 12 4.3 RESULTS................................................................................................................................................. 12 4.4 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................ 12 5 VEGETATION................................................................................................................................................ 13 5.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 13 5.2 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................... 13 5.3 SAMPLING INTENSITY ............................................................................................................................... 13 5.4 RESULTS................................................................................................................................................. 13 5.5 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................ 16 6 FAUNA .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 6.1 BIRDS ..................................................................................................................................................... 17 6.2 MAMMALS ............................................................................................................................................... 30 6.3 AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES .............................................................................................................................. 36 7 FOREST USE ................................................................................................................................................ 44 7.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 44 7.2 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................... 45 7.3 SAMPLING INTENSITY ............................................................................................................................... 46 7.4 RESULTS................................................................................................................................................. 47 7.5 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................ 51 8 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 52 9 RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................................................. 53 9.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL RESEARCH ....................................................................................... 53 9.2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS .............................................. 54 10 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................. 55 2 List of Tables Table 1. Summary of the species richness and endemism in the South Nguru Landscape. .................................... 4 Table 2. Overview of the forest reserves of the South Nguru Mountains. ................................................................ 7 Table 3. Bird survey sampling intensity and sites. ................................................................................................. 17 Table 4. Checklist of bird species recorded in the South Nguru landscape............................................................ 19 Table 5. Comparison of bird species richness between habitats in the South Nguru landscape............................ 27 Table 6. Number of overlapping bird species between forest and other habitats. .................................................. 27 Table 7. Eastern Arc endemic and near-endemic birds
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity Surveys in the Forest Reserves of the Uluguru Mountains
    Biodiversity surveys in the Forest Reserves of the Uluguru Mountains Part II: Descriptions of the biodiversity of individual Forest Reserves Nike Doggart Jon Lovett, Boniface Mhoro, Jacob Kiure and Neil Burgess Biodiversity surveys in the Forest Reserves of the Uluguru Mountains Part II: Descriptions of the biodiversity of individual Forest Reserves Nike Doggart Jon Lovett, Boniface Mhoro, Jacob Kiure and Neil Burgess Dar es Salaam 2004 A Report for: The Wildlife Conservation Society of Tanzania (WCST) The Uluguru Mountains Biodiversity Conservation Project in collaboration with the Uluguru Mountains Agricultural Development Project The Regional Natural Resources Office, and the Regional Catchment Forest Project With support from the Tanzania Forest Conservation Group TABLE OF CONTENTS PART II 1) Introduction to Part II ............................................................................................................... 4 2) Forest Reserve descriptions ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Bunduki I and III Catchment Forest Reserves .................................................................... 7 2.2 Kasanga Local Authority Forest Reserve ......................................................................... 14 2.3 Kimboza Catchment Forest Reserve ................................................................................ 23 2.4 Konga Local Authority Forest Reserve ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OIK-02296 Ferger, SW, Dulle, HI, Schleuning, M
    Oikos OIK-02296 Ferger, S. W., Dulle, H. I., Schleuning, M. and Böhning- Gaese, K: 2015. Frugivore diversity increases frugivory rates along a large elevational gradient. – Oikos doi: 10.1111/oik.02296 Appendix 1. Map of Mt Kilimanjaro showing the location of the 64 study plots in 13 different habitat types. Appendix 2. List of all 187 bird species that were observed, their average body mass and their feeding guild. Appendix 3. Effect of bird abundance/richness and fruit color on the proportion of pecked vs. unpecked artificial fruits without controlling for vertical vegetation heterogeneity and natural fruit abundance. Appendix 4. Effect of vertical vegetation heterogeneity, natural fruit abundance and fruit color on the proportion of pecked versus unpecked artificial fruits. 1 Appendix 1 Map of Mount Kilimanjaro showing the location of the 64 study plots in 13 different habitat types. The near-natural habitat types are savannah (sav), lower montane forest (flm), Ocotea forest (foc), Podocarpus forest (fpo), Erica forest (fer) and Helichrysum scrub (hel). The disturbed habitat types are maize field (mai), Chagga homegarden (hom), shaded coffee plantation (cof), unshaded coffee plantation (sun), grassland (gra), disturbed Ocotea forest (fod) and disturbed Podocarpus forest (fpd). Each habitat type is represented by five replicate plots, except for the unshaded coffee plantation, which is covered by four replicate plots. One of these five (respectively four) plots per habitat type is used as ‘focal plot’ (yellow squares) for especially labor-intensive studies like the artificial fruits experiment presented in this study. As background map, we used the National Geographic World Map developed by National Geographic and Esri (<http://goto.arcgisonline.com/maps/NatGeo_World_Map>).
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Cover and Change for the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests of Tanzania and Kenya Circa 2000 to Circa 2010
    Forest cover and change for the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests of Tanzania and Kenya circa 2000 to circa 2010 Final report Karyn Tabor, Japhet J. Kashaigili, Boniface Mbilinyi, and Timothy M. Wright Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Biodiversity Values of the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests ....................................... 2 1.2 The threats to the forests ............................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Trends in deforestation ................................................................................................................. 6 1.4 The importance of monitoring ...................................................................................................... 8 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 study area ............................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 Mapping methodology ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.3 Habitat change statistics ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Map validation
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Anchored Phylogenomics and Taxon Sampling on Phylogenetic Inference in Narrow-Mouthed Frogs (Anura, Microhylidae)
    Cladistics Cladistics (2015) 1–28 10.1111/cla.12118 The impact of anchored phylogenomics and taxon sampling on phylogenetic inference in narrow-mouthed frogs (Anura, Microhylidae) Pedro L.V. Pelosoa,b,*, Darrel R. Frosta, Stephen J. Richardsc, Miguel T. Rodriguesd, Stephen Donnellane, Masafumi Matsuif, Cristopher J. Raxworthya, S.D. Bijug, Emily Moriarty Lemmonh, Alan R. Lemmoni and Ward C. Wheelerj aDivision of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA; bRichard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA; cHerpetology Department, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; dDepartamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociencias,^ Universidade de Sao~ Paulo, Rua do Matao,~ Trav. 14, n 321, Cidade Universitaria, Caixa Postal 11461, CEP 05422-970, Sao~ Paulo, Sao~ Paulo, Brazil; eCentre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; fGraduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; gSystematics Lab, Department of Environmental Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India; hDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA; iDepartment of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, Dirac Science Library, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4120, USA; jDivision of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA Accepted 4 February 2015 Abstract Despite considerable progress in unravelling the phylogenetic relationships of microhylid frogs, relationships among subfami- lies remain largely unstable and many genera are not demonstrably monophyletic.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use
    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 6 IUCN - The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biologi- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna cal diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- of fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their vation of species or biological diversity. conservation, and for the management of other species of conservation con- cern. Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: sub-species and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintaining biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of bio- vulnerable species. logical diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conservation Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitoring 1. To participate in the further development, promotion and implementation the status of species and populations of conservation concern. of the World Conservation Strategy; to advise on the development of IUCN's Conservation Programme; to support the implementation of the • development and review of conservation action plans and priorities Programme' and to assist in the development, screening, and monitoring for species and their populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Evolution of Phytotelm- Jreeding Anurans
    * ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF PHYTOTELM- JREEDING ANURANS Richard M. Lehtinen Editor MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS I--- - MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 193 Ann Ahr, November, 2004 PUBLICATIONS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZQOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 192 J. B. BURCII,Editot* Ku1.1: SI.EFANOAND JANICEPAPPAS, Assistant Editoras The publications of the Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, consist primarily of two series-the Miscellaneous P~rhlicationsand the Occasional Papers. Both serics were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. Occasionally the Museum publishes contributions outside of thesc series; beginning in 1990 these are titled Special Publications and are numbered. All s~tbmitledmanuscripts to any of the Museum's publications receive external review. The Occasiontrl Papers, begun in 1913, sellie as a mcdium for original studies based prii~cipallyupon the collections in the Museum. They are issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. The Mi.scelluneous Puhlicutions, initiated in 1916, include monographic studies, papers on field and museum techniques, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, and are publislled separately. It is not intended that they bc grouped into volumes. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. A complete list of publications on Mammals, Birds, Reptiles and Amphibians, Fishes, Insects, Mollusks, and other topics is avail- able. Address inquiries to Publications, Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48 109-1079.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation
    Darwin Initiative Award 15/036: Monitoring and Managing Biodiversity Loss in South-East Africa's Montane Ecosystems MT MABU, MOZAMBIQUE: BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION November 2012 Jonathan Timberlake, Julian Bayliss, Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire, Colin Congdon, Bill Branch, Steve Collins, Michael Curran, Robert J. Dowsett, Lincoln Fishpool, Jorge Francisco, Tim Harris, Mirjam Kopp & Camila de Sousa ABRI african butterfly research in Forestry Research Institute of Malawi Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 2 Front cover: Main camp in lower forest area on Mt Mabu (JB). Frontispiece: View over Mabu forest to north (TT, top); Hermenegildo Matimele plant collecting (TT, middle L); view of Mt Mabu from abandoned tea estate (JT, middle R); butterflies (Lachnoptera ayresii) mating (JB, bottom L); Atheris mabuensis (JB, bottom R). Photo credits: JB – Julian Bayliss CS ‒ Camila de Sousa JT – Jonathan Timberlake TT – Tom Timberlake TH – Tim Harris Suggested citation: Timberlake, J.R., Bayliss, J., Dowsett-Lemaire, F., Congdon, C., Branch, W.R., Collins, S., Curran, M., Dowsett, R.J., Fishpool, L., Francisco, J., Harris, T., Kopp, M. & de Sousa, C. (2012). Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation. Report produced under the Darwin Initiative Award 15/036. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London. 94 pp. Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 3 LIST OF CONTENTS List of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Distribution of Faunal Diversity in Kafa Afromontane Coffee Forest
    Status and Distribution of Faunal Diversity in Kafa Afromontane Coffee Forest Leykun Abunie Berhan Submitted to PPP Project July 2008 Addis Ababa Contents Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................4 Introduction..................................................................................................................................6 Literature Review Related to Faunal Diversity and Management...............................................8 Macro Policies and Priorities......................................................................................................8 Environmental Protection Policy.................................................................................................8 Wildlife Development / Management Policy................................................................................9 Analysis of Wildlife Sector in Ethiopia ......................................................................................10 Physical and Ecological Description of the Study Area ............................................................14 Objective of the Present Study...................................................................................................16 Methodology ..............................................................................................................................17 General Approach......................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • NESTLING MOUTH Marklngs It '" "' of OLD WORLD FINCHES ESTLLU MIMICRY and COEVOLUTION of NESTING
    NESTLING MOUTH MARklNGS It '" "' OF OLD WORLD FINCHES ESTLLU MIMICRY AND COEVOLUTION OF NESTING r - .. ;.-; 5.i A&+.FINCHES .-. '4 AND THEIR VIDUA BROOD PARASITES - . , , . :.. - i ' -, ,' $*.$$>&.--: 7 -.: ',"L dt$=%>df;$..;,4;x.;b,?b;.:, ;.:. -, ! ,I Vt .., . k., . .,.-. , .is: 8, :. BY ERT B. PAYNE MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 194 Ann ntwi day, 2005 lSSN 0076-8405 PUBLICATIONS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 194 J. B. BLJR(.H,Editor JI.:NNIFERFBLMLEE, Assistcint Editor The publications of the Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, consist primarily of two series-the Mi.scel/aneous Pziblications and the Occa.siona1 Papers. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W.W. Newcomb. Occasionally thc Museum publishes contributions outside of these series; beginning in 1990 thcsc arc titled Special Publications and arc numbered. All submitted manuscripts to any of the Museum's publications receive external review. The Occasional Papers, begun in 1913, serve as a medium for original studies based principally upon the collections in the Museum. They arc issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. The Miscellaneotls Pt~hlication.~,initiated in 1916, include monographic studies, papers on field and museum techniques, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, and are published separately. It is not intended that they be grouped into volurnes. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Systematics and Diversity of Extant Amphibians
    Systematics and Diversity of 3 Extant Amphibians he three extant lissamphibian lineages (hereafter amples of classic systematics papers. We present widely referred to by the more common term amphibians) used common names of groups in addition to scientifi c Tare descendants of a common ancestor that lived names, noting also that herpetologists colloquially refer during (or soon after) the Late Carboniferous. Since the to most clades by their scientifi c name (e.g., ranids, am- three lineages diverged, each has evolved unique fea- bystomatids, typhlonectids). tures that defi ne the group; however, salamanders, frogs, A total of 7,303 species of amphibians are recognized and caecelians also share many traits that are evidence and new species—primarily tropical frogs and salaman- of their common ancestry. Two of the most defi nitive of ders—continue to be described. Frogs are far more di- these traits are: verse than salamanders and caecelians combined; more than 6,400 (~88%) of extant amphibian species are frogs, 1. Nearly all amphibians have complex life histories. almost 25% of which have been described in the past Most species undergo metamorphosis from an 15 years. Salamanders comprise more than 660 species, aquatic larva to a terrestrial adult, and even spe- and there are 200 species of caecilians. Amphibian diver- cies that lay terrestrial eggs require moist nest sity is not evenly distributed within families. For example, sites to prevent desiccation. Thus, regardless of more than 65% of extant salamanders are in the family the habitat of the adult, all species of amphibians Plethodontidae, and more than 50% of all frogs are in just are fundamentally tied to water.
    [Show full text]
  • Perception and Indicators of Climate Change, Its Impacts, Available Mitigation Strategies in Rice Growing Communities Adjoining Eastern Arc Mountains
    Universal Journal of Agricultural Research 5(5): 267-279, 2017 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujar.2017.050503 Perception and Indicators of Climate Change, Its Impacts, Available Mitigation Strategies in Rice Growing Communities Adjoining Eastern Arc Mountains Kashenge Sophia1,*, Makoninde Emmanuel2 1Agriculture Research Institute – Dakawa, Tanzania 2Kilimanjaro Agriculture Training Center (KATC), Tanzania *Corresponding Authors: [email protected], [email protected] Copyright©2017 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract Ongoing forest disturbances in the areas Tanzania. According to TFCG [19], Eastern Arc Mountains adjoining the Eastern Arc Mountains in Kilombero District originally encompass 23,700 sq. km and stretch in scattered associated with growing population and farm expansion led mountain blocks from the Taita Hills in southern Kenya to to increasing land degradation and fluctuations of the Udzungwa Mountains in southern Tanzania. The main hydrological supply downstream. This threatens not only mountains, from north to south, are: Taita Hills, North and biodiversity but also irrigated rice productivity. A structured South Pare, West and East Usambara, North and South Interview in conjunction with awareness creation was Nguru, Ukaguru, Uluguru, Rubeho, and Udzungwa. These carried out in seven villages (Chita, Mbingu, Kisegese, series of isolated mountains have been heavily covered by Namawala, Mpofu, Njage and Mofu) to determine level of forests and are recognized as one of 34 globally important understanding among rice growers on the potential of these "hot spots" for forest biodiversity according to Conservation mountains for sustainable water flow downstream and the International [7].
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Tanzania
    The wonderful Usambara Eagle Owl... our inevitable bird of the trip! (Pete Morris) REMOTE TANZANIA 27 SEPTEMBER / 1 – 16 / 24 OCTOBER 2016 LEADER: PETE MORRIS Our 2017 tour to ‘Remote Tanzania’ turned out to be a fantastic adventure that way-surpassed most of our expectations. And with the addition of a pre-tour Northern Tanzania endemics extension, and a post-tour Ud- zungwa Mountains extension, the tour really was converted to an ‘Ultimate Tanzania’. For most of the tour we were accompanied by our ever reliable, super friendly and effcient local driver and excellent local guide, and were blessed with largely good weather, most importantly when we were camping up in the mountains. With such a good set up and conditions, there were few excuses, so we effciently set about our task of hoovering up the endemics, whilst enjoying the other wonders that this great country has to offer. 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Remote Tanzania 2016 www.birdquest-tours.com The stunning Swynnerton’s Robin... a highlight of the Udzungwa Extension (Pete Morris) The pre-tour extension involved a whistle stop trek from Arusha to the Lariboro Plains and then down to Ndutu on the edge of the great Serengeti Plains and back via the amazing Ngorongoro Crater. Our task was to fnd the endemics: Grey-breasted Spurfowl, Yellow-collared and Fischer’s Lovebirds, Beesley’s Lark, Rufous-tailed Weaver and Ashy Starling all performed well alongside an excellent cast of other hoped-for birds and mam- mals. The main tour saw us travelling through arid plains and on to the South Pare Mountains, the East and West Usambaras, the attractive Pemba Island, the remote Uluguru and Ukaguru Mountains, the impressive Mikumi National Park and its surrounding miombo woodlands and the little explored Kilombero Plains.
    [Show full text]