NZFSS Newsletter 53 (2014)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NZFSS Newsletter 53 (2014) NUMBER 53 • SEptEMBER 2014 NEW ZEALAND Freshwater Sciences Society NEWSLETTER www.freshwater.science.org.nz MAIN COVER pHOtO: Māori Lakes – Ō tū Wharekai (Ashburton Lakes). Photo © Dave Kelly COVER LOWER pHOtOS: LEFt: World Fish Migration Day fun. See article on page 9. Photo © Sjaan Bowie 2nd FROM LEF t: Critter of the Year. See article on page 17. Photo © Shelley McMurtrie 2nd FROM RIGH t: Investigating fish values in the lower Wairarapa Valley. See article on page 39. Photo © Shyam Morar RIGHt: Working Waters trustproject with Canterbury mudfish. See article on page 66. Photo © Lan Pham New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society accepts no liability with respect to this publication’s content or use. this publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society and/or Organisation/Individual credited. All photographs within this publication are copyright of the Organisation/photographer credited, and may not be used without written permission. © 2014, New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society ISSN 1177–2026 (print) ISSN 1178–6906 (online) Design & layout EOS Ecology, www.eosecology.co.nz Number 53 • September 2014 CONtENtS INtRODUCtION tO tHE SOCIEtY 2 EDItORIAL 4 President’S piecE 5 HE Maimai Aroha – Farewells 6 INVIted ARticles & OpinioN pieces 8 Working towards Improved Fish passage Management in New Zealand 9 First Identification Keys to Freshwater Invertebrates of Campbell Island 10 Freshwater Conservation Under a Changing Climate: preliminary Messages from the 2013 Climate Change Workshop 12 EIANZ: Ecological Impact Assessment Guidelines for Use in New Zealand 14 Land Air Water Aotearoa 15 StUDENt NEWS 16 CRItter OF tHE YEAR 2014 17 Research NEWS 18 Universities 19 Government Organisations & Crown Research Institutes 26 Non-Governmental Organisations 33 Councils & Unitary Authorities 36 Research & Consultancy Companies 46 Iwi Organisations 65 Non-profit Organisations 66 USEFUL LINKS 68 Recent pUBLICAtions 69 ConferenceS 74 Awards 74 NEW ZEALAND Freshwater Sciences SocIEtY MEDAL RecIpient 2013 77 BUDGEt FOR tHE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2013 79 MINUtes OF tHE 46tH Annual General MEEtING OF tHE NEW ZEALAND Limnological SocIEtY INC. 86 ABOUt tHE NEW ZEALAND Freshwater Sciences SocIEtY 90 MEMBERSHIp APPLICAtION 93 1 New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society • NEWSLETTER Cleaned gravel in the Avon River. See article on page 54. Photo © Shelley McMurtrie IN tRODUCtION tO tHE SOCIEtY 2 Number 53 • September 2014 t he New Zealand Limnological Society was formed at a meeting in Christchurch in January 1968. It was renamed the New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society (NZFSS) in 2005 to reflect the broad interests of the membership. Its fundamental aims since inception have been to promote a common meeting ground for freshwater workers in New Zealand and to encourage and promote the exchange of news and views among them. In particular, a newsletter and a list of research workers and their interests is compiled and circulated at least once a year and an annual conference is held. the 2014 subscription is $55.00 per annum; or $15 for students, the unwaged, or retired persons. Committee members for the 2013–2014 period were: President Community Outreach 1984–88 Ms S.F. Davis 1988–92 Dr J.C. Ward p rofessor David Hamilton p osition vacant 1992–96 Dr p. Ryan University of Waikato 1997–00 Dr I.K. Boothroyd private Bag 3105, Hamilton Advocacy & Submissions 2001–02 Dr J.S. Harding [email protected] Kate McArthur 2003–06 Mr N.A. Deans [email protected] Secretary-Treasurer 2006–10 Dr K.J. Collier Janine Wech Media Monitor Previous Secretary- c/- NIWA Mike patrick Treasurers pO Box 8602, Christchurch [email protected] 1968–73 Mr A.M.R Burnet [email protected] 1973–76 Dr C.W. Burns SIL Trust Awards Committee Newsletter Editor 1976–78 Ms L.H. tierney Natasha Grainger Ms S.F. Davis Katharina (Kati) Doehring [email protected] 1978–80 Dr B.t. Coffey Cawthron Institute Mary deWinton 1980–82 Dr J.A. Robb [email protected] [email protected] 1982–84 Dr D. Forsyth 1984–86 Mr B. Biggs Assistant Newsletter Editor Honorary Membership 1986–89 Dr I.W. Lineham Natasha petrove 1990–92 Dr D. Rowe Brian Sorrell [email protected] 1992–94 Dr J. Jasperse Mr A.M.R. Burnet 1994–96 Dr I. Boothroyd prof. C.W. Burns Elected Committee Members 1996–98 Dr. K.J. Collier Dr V. Cassie Cooper 1999–00 Dr J.S. Harding Dr Susie Wood Dr M.A. Chapman 2000–12 Dr B. Sorrell [email protected] Dr G.R. Fish Dr phil Jellyman Dr E.A. Flint Previous Editors [email protected] Dr D.J. Forsyth Dr R.M. McDowall 1968–70 Dr M.A. Chapman Māori Representative Dr D. Scott 1970–72 Dr S.F. Mitchell 1972–75 Dr M.J. Winterbourn Hannah Rainforth Dr V.M. Stout 1975–80 Dr t.K. Crosby [email protected] Dr E. White prof. Emeritus M.J. Winterbourn 1980–82 Dr M.F. Beardsell Mahuru Robb Dr Maureen Lewis 1982–85 Dr J.A. Robb [email protected] 1986–88 Dr J.C. Ward Student Representative Past Presidents 1988–89 Dr J.D. Stark 1989–02 Ms J. talbot 1968–73 Dr V.M. Stout Simon Stewart 2002–04 Dr R. Young 1973–75 Dr M.A. Chapman [email protected] 2004–06 Dr M.J. Winterbourn 1975–76 Dr J.M.A. Brown 2007–09 Dr N. philips Website Manager 1976–78 Dr C.W. Burns 2010–12 Ms H.J. Rainforth 1978–80 Dr M.J. Winterbourn Dr Jeremy ‘Jay’ piggott 1980–84 Dr B.t. Coffey [email protected] 3 New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society • NEWSLETTER EDI tORIAL N pS-FM, RMA, NEMS, NEMAR, this time-lag of impact and restoration always strikes EMAR, NES, SOE, ERB, pCE, me, because what it means is that my children might still not MFE, LAWA …pHEW! be able to swim in some of our rivers when they are grown- the list of governmental ups. this puts some kind of ‘reality-check’ on the work we initiatives and developments do, reminding me why we have to be persistent and patient, that were launched over the keeping up the research, enthusiasm and energy. last year goes on and on and I have to say, it is difficult- at this year’s newsletter is full of stories that give me that times – to keep track of which initiative serves which purpose ‘reality check’ of why we do what we do and I hope you’ll and not just because of the letter puzzle. No doubt the topic enjoy reading it as much as I do. thanks to Natasha petrove freshwater is ‘sexier’ than ever and what surprises me is this (co-editor) and Bronwyn Gay, EOS Ecology (layout) for helping isn’t just a flash in the pan, but freshwater related discussions take this year’s newsletter to yet another level! seem to last for a while, indicating that there must be a real Nga mihi nui, issue. What does that mean for us scientists, policy makers and managers? Well – firstly, we won’t run out of work…, but Kati Doehring more importantly, it means that our knowledge of freshwater N t EWSLEt ER EDItOR systems is more valued than ever. We have reached a phase, where government have finally started to consult on the ‘real deal’, asking for advice to assist them in decision-making processes. this doesn’t automatically mean that everything we say is listened to, included and implemented, but we all know that ‘good things take time’, so if we take one little step after another we’ll get there in the end. After all, our rivers and lakes didn’t get to the state they are in now overnight. 4 Photo © Organisation, Name Number 53 • September 2014 As the sun sets over Lake Rotorua (Kaikōura), the final samples from a mesocosm experiment are collected. Photo © Susie Wood EDItORIAL President’S pIECE I am sure, like me, you hardly go a day, let alone a week, without consensus amongst the various presidents of the societies that hearing another bad news story in the media about the declining science was not being used effectively to guide improvements in state of freshwater resources in New Zealand. As the 2014 freshwater management across the globe. A discussion ensued on election approaches, freshwater is certain to be a major political the United Nations Open Working Group (OWG) for Sustainable issue, and the political parties will seek to either defend their Development Goals. The OWG arose from the United Nations record on freshwater management or propose when lakes Conference on Sustainable Development, held in Rio de Janeiro and rivers will supposedly be ‘cleaned up’. Science has much in 2012 (Rio+20). The focus of the OWG has primarily been on to contribute to this issue in terms of assessing the state of human health, water supply and sanitation and health. However, systems, how long they will take to restore, and what scale of recently it has proposed adding the following: action is necessary to overcome major legacy effects. As scientists 6.3: by 2030, improve water quality by reducing pollution, we need to ask whether science is being adequately engaged eliminating dumping and minimizing release of in this process. This involves not only questioning whether, hazardous chemicals and materials, halving the for example, government, local politicians and councillors are proportion of untreated wastewater, and increasing engaging with, and listening to scientists, but also whether as recycling and safe reuse by x% [to be defined] globally; scientists we are fully aware of major pieces of environmental legislation, their implications and how they may indeed shape 6.6: by 2020 protect and restore water-related ecosystems, the future direction of research and of our organisation.
Recommended publications
  • Critical Habitat for Canterbury Freshwater Fish, Kōura/Kēkēwai and Kākahi
    CRITICAL HABITAT FOR CANTERBURY FRESHWATER FISH, KŌURA/KĒKĒWAI AND KĀKAHI REPORT PREPARED FOR CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL BY RICHARD ALLIBONE WATERWAYS CONSULTING REPORT NUMBER: 55-2018 AND DUNCAN GRAY CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL DATE: DECEMBER 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aquatic habitat in Canterbury supports a range of native freshwater fish and the mega macroinvertebrates kōura/kēkēwai (crayfish) and kākahi (mussel). Loss of habitat, barriers to fish passage, water quality and water quantity issues present management challenges when we seek to protect this freshwater fauna while providing for human use. Water plans in Canterbury are intended to set rules for the use of water, the quality of water in aquatic systems and activities that occur within and adjacent to aquatic areas. To inform the planning and resource consent processes, information on the distribution of species and their critical habitat requirements can be used to provide for their protection. This report assesses the conservation status and distributions of indigenous freshwater fish, kēkēwai and kākahi in the Canterbury region. The report identifies the geographic distribution of these species and provides information on the critical habitat requirements of these species and/or populations. Water Ways Consulting Ltd Critical habitats for Canterbury aquatic fauna Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Methods ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes
    diversity Article A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes Rachel A. Paterson 1,*, Gustavo P. Viozzi 2, Carlos A. Rauque 2, Verónica R. Flores 2 and Robert Poulin 3 1 The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685, Torgarden, 7485 Trondheim, Norway 2 Laboratorio de Parasitología, INIBIOMA, CONICET—Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Argentina; [email protected] (G.P.V.); [email protected] (C.A.R.); veronicaroxanafl[email protected] (V.R.F.) 3 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-481-37-867 Abstract: Free-living species often receive greater conservation attention than the parasites they support, with parasite conservation often being hindered by a lack of parasite biodiversity knowl- edge. This study aimed to determine the current state of knowledge regarding parasites of the Southern Hemisphere freshwater fish family Galaxiidae, in order to identify knowledge gaps to focus future research attention. Specifically, we assessed how galaxiid–parasite knowledge differs among geographic regions in relation to research effort (i.e., number of studies or fish individuals examined, extent of tissue examination, taxonomic resolution), in addition to ecological traits known to influ- ence parasite richness. To date, ~50% of galaxiid species have been examined for parasites, though the majority of studies have focused on single parasite taxa rather than assessing the full diversity of macro- and microparasites. The highest number of parasites were observed from Argentinean galaxiids, and studies in all geographic regions were biased towards the highly abundant and most widely distributed galaxiid species, Galaxias maculatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Genomics of a Plastic Life History Trait: Galaxias Maculatus Amphidromous and Resident Populations
    EVOLUTIONARY GENOMICS OF A PLASTIC LIFE HISTORY TRAIT: GALAXIAS MACULATUS AMPHIDROMOUS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS by María Lisette Delgado Aquije Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2021 Dalhousie University is located in Mi'kma'ki, the ancestral and unceded territory of the Mi'kmaq. We are all Treaty people. © Copyright by María Lisette Delgado Aquije, 2021 I dedicate this work to my parents, María and José, my brothers JR and Eduardo for their unconditional love and support and for always encouraging me to pursue my dreams, and to my grandparents Victoria, Estela, Jesús, and Pepe whose example of perseverance and hard work allowed me to reach this point. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... ix ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... xii LIST OF ABBREVIATION USED ................................................................................ xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ xv CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Galaxias maculatus ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention
    Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: the role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity edited by A. J. Hails Ramsar Convention Bureau Ministry of Environment and Forest, India 1996 [1997] Published by the Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, with the support of: • the General Directorate of Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of the Walloon Region, Belgium • the Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark • the National Forest and Nature Agency, Ministry of the Environment and Energy, Denmark • the Ministry of Environment and Forests, India • the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Sweden Copyright © Ramsar Convention Bureau, 1997. Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior perinission from the copyright holder, providing that full acknowledgement is given. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The views of the authors expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of the Ramsar Convention Bureau or of the Ministry of the Environment of India. Note: the designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Ranasar Convention Bureau concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Citation: Halls, A.J. (ed.), 1997. Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: The Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish Spawning and Migration Periods
    Freshwater Fish Spawning and Migration Periods Prepared for Ministry for Primary Industries November 2014 Prepared by: Josh Smith For any information regarding this report please contact: Josh Smith Freshwater Fish Technician Freshwater & Estuaries Phone +64 07 8567026 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd Gate 10 Silverdale Road Hillcrest, Hamilton 3216 PO Box 11115, Hillcrest Hamilton 3251 New Zealand Phone +64 07 8567026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2014-101 Report date: November 2014 NIWA Project: MPI15202 ISBN 978-0-473-32827-6 © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canterbury Mudfish 11
    NEW ZEALAND MUDFISHES A GUIDE Nicholas Ling NEW ZEALAND MUDFISHES A GUIDE Nicholas Ling New Zealand mudfishes: a guide First published 2001 Acknowledgements: This publication originated from Department of Conservation, Science & Research Division contract 2485, and was published with financial assistance from the J.S.Watson Trust, Forest and Bird Society of New Zealand. Photographs © Nicholas Ling, Barry O’Brien and Tony Eldon. Drawings © Catherine Beard ISBN 0-478-22175-4 Published by Department of Conservation University of Waikato P O Box 10-420 Private Bag 3105 Wellington Hamilton CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 WHAT ARE MUDFISHES 2 MUDFISH HABITATS AND ECOLOGY 3 AESTIVATION – A FISH OUT OF WATER 7 BLACK MUDFISH 8 NORTHLAND MUDFISH 9 BROWN MUDFISH 10 CANTERBURY MUDFISH 11 STUDYING MUDFISHES 12 KEEPING MUDFISHES 13 MUDFISH IDENTIFICATION 14 MUDFISH CONSERVATION 16 GLOSSARY 19 FURTHER READING 20 Introduction n New Zealand’s mudfishes are unusual fish by any standards. When their wetland habitats dry out in summer, they burrow into the soil and remain there, motionless, breathing air, until the first decent flood of autumn refills the wetland and washes them from their refuge. Few fish species worldwide have such ability to survive for extended periods out of water. Early settlers in New Zealand were surprised to find live fish when digging vegetables from the earth. This ability to survive prolonged periods of drought allows them to colonise habitats that would be unsuitable for conventional fishes, which cannot survive out of water. These cryptic, nocturnal fish were probably once the most abundant freshwater fish in New Zealand. However, the loss of more than 90% of our wetlands over the past two centuries has confined them to a few refuge habitats still threatened by development of adjacent land.
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovering the Species in Community-Wide Predictive Modeling
    Ecological Applications, 16(4), 2006, pp. 1449–1460 Ó 2006 by the the Ecological Society of America REDISCOVERING THE SPECIES IN COMMUNITY-WIDE PREDICTIVE MODELING 1,3 2 2 JULIAN D. OLDEN, MICHAEL K. JOY, AND RUSSELL G. DEATH 1Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 680 N. Park Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 USA 2Institute of Natural Resources–Ecology, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand Abstract. Broadening the scope of conservation efforts to protect entire communities provides several advantages over the current species-specific focus, yet ecologists have been hampered by the fact that predictive modeling of multiple species is not directly amenable to traditional statistical approaches. Perhaps the greatest hurdle in community-wide modeling is that communities are composed of both co-occurring groups of species and species arranged independently along environmental gradients. Therefore, commonly used ‘‘short-cut’’ methods such as the modeling of so-called ‘‘assemblage types’’ are problematic. Our study demonstrates the utility of a multiresponse artificial neural network (MANN) to model entire community membership in an integrative yet species-specific manner. We compare MANN to two traditional approaches used to predict community composition: (1) a species-by-species approach using logistic regression analysis (LOG) and (2) a ‘‘classification-then-modeling’’ approach in which sites are classified into assemblage ‘‘types’’ (here we used two-way indicator species analysis and multiple discriminant analysis [MDA]). For freshwater fish assemblages of the North Island, New Zealand, we found that the MANN outperformed all other methods for predicting community composition based on multiscaled descriptors of the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Using Community Group Monitoring Data to Measure The
    25 Using Community Group Monitoring Data To Measure The Effectiveness Of Restoration Actions For Australia's Woodland Birds Michelle Gibson1, Jessica Walsh1,2, Nicki Taws5, Martine Maron1 1Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, 4072, Queensland, Australia, 2School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, 3800, Victoria, Australia, 3Greening Australia, Aranda, Canberra, 2614 Australian Capital Territory, Australia, 4BirdLife Australia, Carlton, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia, 5Greening Australia, PO Box 538 Jamison Centre, Macquarie, Australian Capital Territory 2614, Australia Before conservation actions are implemented, they should be evaluated for their effectiveness to ensure the best possible outcomes. However, many conservation actions are not implemented under an experimental framework, making it difficult to measure their effectiveness. Ecological monitoring datasets provide useful opportunities for measuring the effect of conservation actions and a baseline upon which adaptive management can be built. We measure the effect of conservation actions on Australian woodland ecosystems using two community group-led bird monitoring datasets. Australia’s temperate woodlands have been largely cleared for agricultural production and their bird communities are in decline. To reverse these declines, a suite of conservation actions has been implemented by government and non- government agencies, and private landholders. We analysed the response of total woodland bird abundance, species richness, and community condition, to two widely-used actions — grazing exclusion and replanting. We recorded 139 species from 134 sites and 1,389 surveys over a 20-year period. Grazing exclusion and replanting combined had strong positive effects on all three bird community metrics over time relative to control sites, where no actions had occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Mudfish, Neochanna (Teleostei: Galaxiidae), from Northern New Zealand
    © Journal of The Royal Society of New Zealand Volume 31 Number 2 June 2001 pp 385-392 A new species of mudfish, Neochanna (Teleostei: Galaxiidae), from northern New Zealand Nicholas Ling* and Dianne M. Gleeson" A new species of mudfish, Neochanna, is described from Northland Neochanna heleios n sp is known from only three ephemeral wetland sites on the Kenken volcanic plateau and is abundant only at the type locality The new species has a head resembling that of the brown mudfish, Neochanna apoda, and a caudal region resembling that of the black mudfish, Neochanna diversus It can be distinguished from all Neochanna species in having a reduced number of pnncipal caudal fin rays (13 or less) Morphometnc and menstic comparisons with N apoda and N diversus are provided Keywords Neochanna Neochanna heleios mudfish new species, Northland, New Zealand INTRODUCTION The genus Neochanna Gunther (1867) comprises a group of galaxnd fishes from Australia and New Zealand commonly known as mudfishes (McDowall 1997) They are scale-less, elongate, tubular bodied fishes with blunt heads and small eyes, and are characterised by reduced or absent pelvic fins and few or absent endopterygoid teeth All New Zealand species are non-diadromous and usually occupy ephemeral habitats that dry out over summer- autumn months, where these fish aestivate in damp refugia such as mud or moss, or under tree roots and logs Neochanna apoda Gunther (1867), the brown mudfish, is considered the most specialised of the group with distinctly anguilliform characters It lacks pelvic
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish Taxonomic Workshop Focussing on New Zealand Non- Migratory Galaxias Taxonomic Issues
    Freshwater fish taxonomic workshop Focussing on New Zealand non- migratory galaxias taxonomic issues Proceedings compiled by: Sjaan Bowie, Lan Pham, Nicholas Dunn, Richard Allibone, and Shannan Crow How to cite this document: Bowie, S. Pham, L, Dunn, N, Allibone, R, & Crow, S. (Eds) 2014: Freshwater fish taxonomic workshop focussing on New Zealand non-migratory galaxias taxonomic issues. Proceedings of a workshop, Dunedin 14th May 2013. Unpublished DOC publication. Christchurch. © Copyright May 2014, New Zealand Department of Conservation DOCDM-1205404 In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4 2. Overview of genetic and morphological data used for current non- migratory galaxias groupings .................................................................................... 5 2.1 Background ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Workshop group conclusion ................................................................................. 7 2.3 Non-migratory galaxias data management ........................................................... 7 3. Groupings of non-migratory Galaxias ....................................................................... 8 3.1 Background ........................................................................................................... 8 3.2 New Zealand
    [Show full text]
  • Lethal Turbidity Levels for Common Fish and Invertebrates in Auckland
    Lethal Turbidity Levels for Common Fish and Invertebrates in Auckland Streams June 2002 TP337 Auckland Regional Council Technical Publication No. 337, 2002 ISSN 1175-205X" ISBN -13 : 978-1-877416-78-1 ISBN -10 : 1877416-78-9 Printed on recycled paper Lethal turbidity levels for common freshwater fish and invertebrates in Auckland streams D. K. Rowe A. M. Suren M. Martin J. P. Smith B. Smith E. Williams Prepared for Auckland Regional Council Information contained within this report should not be used without the prior consent of the client NIWA Client Report: ARC02283 June 2002 National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd Gate 10, Silverdale Road, Hamilton P O Box 11115, Hamilton, New Zealand Phone +64-7-856 7026, Fax +64-7-856 0151 www.niwa.co.nz Acknowledgements We would like to thank John Maxted (and his staff) for supplying the clay used for testing, as well as for his guidance on invertebrate selection and important aspects of the study’s design. Recommended Citation: Rowe, D.K., et. al. (2002). Lethal turbidity levels for common freshwater fish and invertebrates in Auckland streams. Auckland Regional Council Technical Publication Number 337. 37 p. CONTENTS 1.1.1. Executive Summary 111 2.2.2. Introduction 222 3.3.3. Sediment Characterisation 444 4.4.4. Effects Of Turbidity On Fish 666 4.1 Fish selection, collection and acclimation 6 4.2 Experimental methods 6 4.3 Data analysis 9 4.4 Results 10 4.5 Discussion 19 5.5.5. Effects of Turbidity on InvInvertebratesertebrates 222222 5.1 Choice of invertebrate species 22 5.2 Experimental methods 23 5.3 Results 26 5.4 Discussion 28 666 Conclusions 313131 777 Recommendations 323232 888 References 333333 Reviewed by: Approved for release by: Mike Scarsbrook Jody Richardson TP 337 - Lethal Turbidity Levels For Common Freshwater Fish and Invertebrates in Auckland Streams 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Phylogeny, Biogeography and Taxonomy of Galaxioid Fishes
    Aspects of the phylogeny, biogeography and taxonomy of galaxioid fishes Jonathan Michael Waters, BSc. (Hons.) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, / 2- Oo ( 01 f University of Tasmania (August, 1996) Paragalaxias dissim1/is (Regan); illustrated by David Crook Statements I declare that this thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no material previously published o:r written by another person, except where due reference is made in the text. This thesis is not to be made available for loan or copying for two years following the date this statement is signed. Following that time the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Signed Summary This study used two distinct methods to infer phylogenetic relationships of members of the Galaxioidea. The first approach involved direct sequencing of mitochondrial DNA to produce a molecular phylogeny. Secondly, a thorough osteological study of the galaxiines was the basis of a cladistic analysis to produce a morphological phylogeny. Phylogenetic analysis of 303 base pairs of mitochondrial cytochrome b _supported the monophyly of Neochanna, Paragalaxias and Galaxiella. This gene also reinforced recognised groups such as Galaxias truttaceus-G. auratus and G. fasciatus-G. argenteus. In a previously unrecognised grouping, Galaxias olidus and G. parvus were united as a sister clade to Paragalaxias. In addition, Nesogalaxias neocaledonicus and G. paucispondylus were included in a clade containing G.
    [Show full text]