TAX RATIONALITY, POLITICS, AND MEDIA SPIN: A CASE STUDY OF THE FAILED ‘CAR PARK TAX’ PROPOSAL WORKING PAPER SERIES Working Paper No. 102 May 2016 Jonathan Barrett & John Veal Correspondence to: Jonathan Barrett Email:
[email protected] Centre for Accounting, Governance and Taxation Research School of Accounting and Commercial Law Victoria University of Wellington PO Box 600, Wellington, NEW ZEALAND Tel: + 64 4 463 5078 Fax: + 64 4 463 5076 Website: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/sacl/cagtr/ TAX RATIONALITY, POLITICS, AND MEDIA SPIN: A CASE STUDY OF THE FAILED ‘CAR PARK TAX’ PROPOSAL by Jonathan Barrett, School of Accounting and Commercial Law, Victoria University of Wellington John Veal, School of Business, Open Polytechnic 1 TAX RATIONALITY, POLITICS, AND MEDIA SPIN: A CASE STUDY OF THE FAILED ‘CAR PARK TAX’ PROPOSAL ABSTRACT The Generic Tax Policy Process (“GTPP”) is designed to ensure open and consultative development of tax policy and law in New Zealand. Despite complying with the GTPP, a proposal to extend fringe benefit tax to certain employer-funded car parking was withdrawn in the face of media criticism. This paper uses the failed ‘car park tax’ proposal as a case study to illustrate how a rational development process, such as GTPP, is insufficient in tax discourse. Government also needs to “out spin” its opponents. This paper outlines the GTPP and the progress of the “car park tax” proposal through that process. The paper then tells the story of the proposal’s failure using a timeline which focuses on print media reports. The proposal was flawed in certain regards; nevertheless this narrative demonstrates the ineffective “spinning” of the proposal to the media and public, and, in contrast, the effective opposition by an alliance of special interest groups.