Final Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Thesis Old Problem, New Zealand: An Applied Analysis of the Maori Among Indigenous Peoples by Megan Elizabeth Rohn 2-color (and 4-color process) In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in International Relations Version 1 (“Logo Version”) of the College Mark Version, 2, “Seal Version” of the College Mark Single-color Version 1 (“Logo Version”) of the College Mark Version, 2, “Seal Version” of the College Mark Dark backgrounds (Reversed) POMONA COLLEGE Claremont, California The Twenty-Seventh of April, Two-Thousand and Eighteen Version, 2, “Seal Version” of the College Mark Embossed Version 1 (“Logo Version”) of the College Mark ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Megan would like to acknowledge her friends and new family (whanau) in New Zealand for helping her complete this thesis, especially Lyn Wilson, Maria Amo, Auntie, and Jan and Greg Presland. She would also like to thank Kate Cherrington, Paula Bold-Wilson, Tu Williams, and Matt McCarten for their interviews. An additional thanks to all of these interviewees for agreeing to have their real names in this thesis, since it is not being published at the moment. Furthermore, Megan is grateful to the Pomona College International Relations Department for funding her research, and to Professors Englebert, Gladney, and Marks for guiding her through the process. She is also thankful for the support of her parents and friends in America. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Literature Review 1.1 Introduction of Research Question … 1 1.2 Literature Review … 7 Frame 1: Maori with Respect to Pakeha … 12 A Brief History of Maori-Pakeha Relations … 14 Frame 2: Maori with Respect to Other Native Peoples … 16 A Brief History of Native American-European Relations … 18 Additional Contributing Literature … 20 Research Strategy … 23 Chapter 2: Interview Analysis Preface: Analyzing Two Self-Comparing Groups From An External Viewpoint … 26 2.1 Kate Cherrington … 28 2.2 Paula Bold-Wilson … 38 2.3 Lyn Wilson and Maria Amo … 40 2.4 Tu Williams … 51 2.5 Jan and Greg Presland … 57 2.6 Conclusion … 59 Chapter 3: Data Analysis 3.1 Maori and Native Americans vs. Nonindigenous Counterparts … 62 3.2 Maori and Native Americans vs. Global Indigenous Average … 63 3.3 Analysis … 66 Chapter 4: Policy Suggestions Comparative Historical Context … 69 4.1 Self-Governance of Reservations and Continued Land Returns … 72 4.2 Increased Language Nest Funding and Scope … 76 4.3 National Language Week and Further Cultural Integration … 79 4.4 More Effective Representation in Federal Government … 82 4.5 Conclusion … 86 Works Cited … 90 1 CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW 1.1 Introduction of Research Question In New Zealand, descendants of the native people are called Maori, and descendants of English colonialists are called Pakeha. When the colonists arrived in New Zealand in 1840, they signed a document known as the Treaty of Waitangi with the Maori people. The British were interested in the Treaty as a means of formalizing their claim over New Zealand so that other European colonial powers could not lay claim to it (Orange). Unlike Australian aboriginal peoples, the Maori of New Zealand spoke one language and were well-learned in musket warfare by the time the British arrived (Ministry for Culture and Heritage 2015). Thus, the colonists were forced to negotiate a treaty, as opposed to simply claiming the continent for themselves as they often did. The Maori chiefs, not all of whom signed the Treaty, wanted to maintain their rights over their land, and some believed that negotiating with the settlers would force tribes to stop fighting amongst each other. The Treaty gave the Crown sovereignty over New Zealand whilst ensuring that Maori retained their rights to own or sell their land and possessions (Orange). While this treaty sounded promising from the outset, the rights of the indigenous peoples were quickly ignored by the British, and soon the Maori were treated like second-class subjects (Allen, 61). Worse still, when citizens compared the Maori and English versions of the Treaty, they realized that the Maori version only promised government (kawanatanga) of New Zealand to the Crown, while the English version gave total sovereignty of New Zealand to Great Britain (Allen, 61). There was no equivalent word or concept for “sovereignty” in Maori, and as such the Maori people had no way to argue on their own behalf about the variation between the two 2 treaties. Colonists used this intentional mistranslation to claim unwarranted authority over the Maori people until New Zealand became self-governing in 1907. Even after 1907, Maori people remained oppressed until the 1980’s when the Treaty of Waitangi was revitalized during the “Maori Renaissance,” which I will address shortly. Subsequently, in the decades since the Renaissance, a popular consensus has developed that Maori are generally better off today than many other indigenous groups, such as the Aboriginal people of Australia, and the Native Americans (Albury 2015, Leahy 2017, Duff 2013, Minorities at Risk 2009). In both of these other groups, substance abuse is more prevalent than the white populations of their respective countries today, their economic wellbeing is significantly worse than that of their white counterparts, and both indigenous populations appear to be much more severely affected by racism than the Maori (Volkow 2014). In America specifically, Native Americans were driven off of their lands by the Indian Removal Act of 1830 and subjected to the “Trail of Tears,” wherein they were sanctioned off to live on reservations (Cherokee Nation 2017). Native Americans are no longer required to live on reservations, but 22 percent still live on these reservations today (US Census Bureau 2016). Although Native Americans are no longer “segregated” from the rest of the country in such an explicit manner, this historical segregation has had lasting impacts on their participation in American society, especially with regards to government. To date, there have only been five Native American senators, and 16 Native Americans in the House of Representatives (Stubben, 172). While this is not necessarily the direct result of past segregation, the historical oppression of Native Americans has certainly not helped them to gain representation in government (Stubben, 172). 3 In contrast, Maori people have had guaranteed representation in the New Zealand parliament since the signing of the Maori Representation Act of 1867 (New Zealand Government 2017). This Act split New Zealand into four major electorates and guaranteed a Maori Member of Parliament (MP) for each electorate. Over time, as population has increased, the country has been re-divided into seven electorates, but the quota system in Parliament still persists. While the government as a source may be self-congratulatory about this quota system, it nevertheless exists and is extremely beneficial to Maori political representation. Numerically speaking, Native Americans only account for roughly two percent of the United States population, whereas Maori people account for over 15 percent of New Zealanders (New Zealand Government 2013; US Census Bureau 2016). This is an extremely significant factor in the political leverage that Maori have in New Zealand, compared with the smaller political influence of the relatively lower percentage of Native Americans in the United States. Furthermore, the Maori have one language which is taught to some extent in a majority of schools, whereas Native Americans have over ten recognized languages, making it more difficult to feel a collective identity from language. One argument as to why Maori have undergone slightly less post-colonial trauma is their distribution and population on the islands of New Zealand, relative to that of America. In the United States, the Native Americans had been living and migrating across the continent for some 13,000 years, giving them time to break off into several distinct tribes and regions with their own languages (Basu 2015). Consequently, when the British colonialists arrived, they thought the Native Americans were all still “savages,” and did not respect any of their claims to the land (Davis 2008). Instead, the colonizers declared the land was theirs because they believed it did not belong to any other particular group, while in reality it belonged to several indigenous groups. 4 In New Zealand, however, the Maori people had only migrated from Samoa and other islands in the late 13th century, whereas Aboriginal people arrived in Australia approximately 50,000 years ago (New Zealand Government 2016; Tobler et. al., 2017). As such, they did not have time to grow apart into as many separate tribes. This meant that when the Dutch and English arrived during the 18th and 19th centuries, they had actual groups with whom they were forced to negotiate, unlike the Aboriginal people of Australia who were spread too thinly to band together and respond to the colonialists’ arrival (Leahy 2017). This is because New Zealand is much smaller than Australia, so the Maori stayed somewhat more concentrated in smaller areas. Additionally, prior to the arrival of the colonialists, the Maori had just undergone the Musket Wars, which helped them understand the use of the forthcoming British weaponry and develop military tactics that the English would not develop until decades later (Ministry for Culture and Heritage 2015). This made them more adept at combatting the British, as Ron Crosby explains in his book, The Musket Wars: A History of Inter-Iwi Conflict 1806-45. Subsequently, the Maori- Pakeha wars that followed were less detrimental to the Maori people than the colonization of America was to the Native Americans (Crosby 312). While Maori people often have lower salaries and higher unemployment than Pakeha, their culture appears to be much more respected, and much of this progress is recent. In the 1970s and 1980s, Maori people staged cultural protests known as the Maori Renaissance and demanded that the Treaty of Waitangi be given more respect (O’Sullivan 2007).
Recommended publications
  • A Short History of the Unite Union in New Zealand by Mike Treen Unite National Director April 29, 2014
    AA shortshort historyhistory ofof thethe UniteUnite UnionUnion inin NewNew ZealandZealand ByBy MikeMike TreenTreen ! A short history of the Unite Union in New Zealand By Mike Treen Unite National Director April 29, 2014 SkyCity Casino strike 2011 ! In the late 1980s and early 1990s, workers in New union law. When the Employment Contracts Act was Zealand suffered a massive setback in their levels made law on May Day 1990, every single worker of union and social organisation and their living covered by a collective agreement was put onto an standards. A neo-liberal, Labour Government elected individual employment agreement identical to the in 1984 began the assault and it was continued and terms of their previous collective. In order for the deepened by a National Party government elected in union to continue to negotiate on your behalf, you 1990. had to sign an individual authorisation. It was very difficult for some unions to manage that. Many The “free trade”policies adopted by both Labour were eliminated overnight. Voluntary unionism was and the National Party led to massive factory introduced and closed shops were outlawed. All of closures. The entire car industry was eliminated and the legal wage protections which stipulated breaks, textile industries were closed. Other industries with overtime rates, Sunday rates and so on, went. traditionally strong union organisation such as the Minimum legal conditions were now very limited - meat industry were restructured and thousands lost three weeks holiday and five days sick leave was their jobs. Official unemployment reached 11.2% in about the lot. Everything else had to be negotiated the early 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Activist #2, 2013
    Rail & Maritime Transport Union Volume 2013 # 2 Published Regularly - ISSN 1178-7392 (Print & Online) 22 February 2013 TRANSPORT WORKER – ISSUE 1 union in Dunedin, marking as it did the end (for now) of a Branch which has fought for The mag is done and off to the printers. workers at Hillside for generations. This issue is full of robust stories with a That said, the Otago Rail Branch is very strong emphasis on H&S issues within active and enjoys the support of the KiwiRail. We also have notes from 90% of membership and has some extremely the Union’s branches which are essential capable delegates and Officials. The Hillside for giving all areas of the membership a workers will be well supported and we look voice and platform to be heard from. forward to the day when the next Labour led 2ND ANNIVERSARY – Government honours its commitment to reinstate rail manufacturing at Hillside and CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKE the likely re-formation of a Hillside Branch! Today marks the second anniversary of the A sad event and all preventable if we had a February 22 earthquake and we all need to meaningful local content procurement policy reflect upon the difficulties that our like most other countries. Canterbury members have been working and living in since that fateful day. Some of LYTTELTON PORT COMPANY our members do not still have a working The hearing for the City Depot case toilet in their home. commences on Monday in the Employment We must not forget that 115 people lost Court in Christchurch. their lives in the CTV building alone and so Members will recall that the RMTU won a we must, as a society, ensure that all case in the Employment Relations Authority future buildings are fit for purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • The Media We Want by 2020
    MEDIANZ VOL 17 NO 1 • 2017 https://DOI.org/10.11157/medianz-vol17iss1id185 - ARTICLE - The Media We Want By 2020 Gavin Ellis Abstract A period as short as three years will not produce fundamental change to New Zealand’s news media landscape but there is scope for positive improvement within a version of the status quo. Media – and the workings of democracy – would be improved by market reform, greater co- operation in news-gathering, and comprehensive multimedia regulation that protects citizens’ rights. However, for mainstream media to fully serve their democratic function they must urgently institute measures to regain the public’s trust. Forecasting the future of journalism follows one of two paths: it is either an understandable desire to seek Jerusalem and William Blake’s Countenance Divine shining forth upon our clouded hills, or to deny Jerusalem and foresee the endless grinding of dark Satanic mills. Yet hovering over any prediction on the future of journalism is its susceptibility to sudden change. Even an attempt to steer a sober middle course between determinism and chaos is fraught with risk. There is an object lesson in Leo Bogart’s 1989 prognosis on the state of newspapers that ‘the worst appears to be over’ (Bogart 1989, 49). He had the misfortune to make his prediction in the year that Tim Berners-Lee introduced the world to his wide web and Rupert Murdoch launched Sky TV in the United Kingdom. The lesson: when divining media futures, be aware that you may be proven wrong by the passage of a relatively short space of time.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTORAL CHANGE, INERTIA and CAMPAIGNS in NEW ZEALAND the First Modern FPP Campaign in 1987 and the First MMP Campaign in 1996
    PARTY POLITICS VOL 9. No.5 pp. 601–618 Copyright © 2003 SAGE Publications London Thousand Oaks New Delhi www.sagepublications.com ELECTORAL CHANGE, INERTIA AND CAMPAIGNS IN NEW ZEALAND The First Modern FPP Campaign in 1987 and the First MMP Campaign in 1996 David Denemark ABSTRACT Electoral change creates important and competing incentives for political parties, parliamentary elites and candidates to transform their campaign techniques in order to maximize votes under the new realities – a process constrained by continued reliance on familiar techniques. In this article I examine two significant moments of electoral change in New Zealand – from partisan stability to dealignment in the late 1980s, and from an SMP/plurality system to Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) represen- tation in 1996 – as a way of exploring inertia and change in the trans- formation of campaigns at the constituency level. Drawing on findings from in-depth interviews conducted with individuals responsible for the parties’ campaigns in the 1987 and 1996 New Zealand general elections, I explore the extent to which political campaign elites, parliamentarians and candidates responded to incentives to adopt a fundamentally new election campaign logic – in these two cases, dictated by the new tactical centrality of marginal seats and geographically defined constituencies in the modern first-past-the-post (FPP) campaign, and then by the ascend- ancy in their place of the party list vote, issue constituencies and nation- wide campaigns under MMP. KEY WORDS campaigns constituency electoral change mixed member proportional New Zealand Introduction Election campaigns – their strategies, techniques and technologies – are the product of the electoral systems within which they are waged (Katz, 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • How Unite Took on Fast Food Companies Over
    HOWHOW UNITEUNITE TOOKTOOK ONON FASTFAST FOODFOOD COMPANIESCOMPANIES OVEROVER ZEROZERO HOURHOUR CONTRACTSCONTRACTS (AND(AND WON)WON) by Mike TreenTreen 1 2 Workers in the fast food industry in New Zealand scored a spectacular victory over what has been dubbed “zero hour contracts” during a collective agreement bargaining round over the course of March and April 2015. The campaign played out over the national media as well as on picket lines. The victory was seen by many observers as the product of a determined fight by a valiant group of workers and their union, Unite. It was a morale boost for all working people after what has seemed like a period of retreat for working class struggle in recent years. Unite Union’s National Director Mike Treen tells the inside story of how a union took on the fast food companies and won. Workers in the fast food industry have long identified “zero These zero-hour contracts are not a new phenomenon. hour contracts” as the central problem they face. These They became entrenched in the 1990s during the dark are contracts that don’t guarantee any hours per week, days of the Employment Contracts Act. They affect literally meanwhile workers are expected to work any shifts rostered hundreds of thousands of workers in fast food, cinemas, within the workers “availability”. Managers have power to hotels, home care, security, cleaning, hospitality, restaurants use and abuse the rostering system to reward and punish, and retail. without any real means of holding them to account. The fast food industry in New Zealand includes the foreign This year, all the collective agreements with the major owned McDonald’s, Burger King and Domino’s Pizza chains, fast food companies (McDonald’s, Burger King, Restaurant the locally-owned businesses that pay for the right to market Brands) expired on March 31.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition Traits That Affected New Zealand’S MMP Governments of 1996-2002
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Formation, Durability and Susceptibility Coalition Traits that Affected New Zealand’s MMP Governments of 1996-2002 A dissertation presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Policy Massey University Albany Campus, North Shore City, New Zealand Grant Marc Gillon 2007 Abstract This thesis explores the relevant impact of three influences - policy, personality and opportunity - on New Zealand governments since 1996. The Mixed Member Proportional electoral system (MMP) was adopted by New Zealand for the 1996 general election. The various coalition government arrangements since then have been analysed using a series of case studies of identified events during coalitions’ crucial pre-election, formation, duration and termination stages. The roles assumed by, or perceived of, small parties have been important as have the actions of the pivotal party in each government. My interest in this topic springs from my service as an Alliance MP. I was an Alliance party list Member of Parliament during the 45th and 46th Parliaments (1996-2002). Systems theory was relied upon as the methodology with which to study relevant political processes. Key informant interviews and participant observation were the main research methods. This research investigates the traits, apparent in the coalitions formed from 1996 until 2002, which contributed to each government’s continuation or termination. Each stage reflected the parties’ competing interests as argued by theorists such as Muller and Strøm.
    [Show full text]
  • NZJER, 2011, 36(2) Name Title Page Number NZJER Special Issue: the General Erling Rasmussen Election in New Zealand in 2011 1
    Contents Page: NZJER, 2011, 36(2) Name Title Page Number NZJER Special Issue: The General Erling Rasmussen Election in New Zealand in 2011 1 Time for a Change in Employment 2-8 Darien Fenton Relations Approach The Minor Parties: Policies and 9-22 Peter Skilling & Attitudes Julienne Molineaux A Commentary on Politics and 23-32 Nigel Haworth Employment Relations in New Zealand: 2008-2011 The Employment Relations Act 2000: 33-44 Alan Geare, Fiona a Brief Overview and Suggested Edgar & Kelly Honey Changes Legislation for Participation: an 45-60 Leigh-Ann Harris Overview of New Zealand’s Health and Safety Representative Employee Participation System. New Zealand Employer Attitudes and 61-76 Erling Rasmussen & Behaviours: What are the Implications Barry Foster for Lifting Productivity Growth? New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations 36(2): 1 NZJER Special Issue: The General Election in New Zealand in 2011 Editorial It has been a tradition that the New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations publishes a special issue on employment relations issues in the run up to a General Election. While this issue follows that tradition, there are two major changes. Under the Mixed Member Proportion (MMP) electoral system, minor parties and their policy positions have become more important. As there are at least five or six minor political parties which could have an influence on the formation of the next Government, a suitable coverage of each party’s policies could have been a rather extensive. Instead, the Journal editors took the decision to commission an overview article from two academics. The overview article by Peter Skilling and Julienne Molineaux covers six political parties and provides a brief insight into the employment relations position of each party.
    [Show full text]
  • Advertising and the Market Orientation of Political Parties Contesting the 1999 and 2002 New Zealand General Election Campaigns
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. ADVERTISING AND THE MARKET ORIENTATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES CONTESTING THE 1999 AND 2002 NEW ZEALAND GENERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS A THESIS PRESENTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICS AT MASSEY UNIVERSITY, PALMERSTON NORTH, NEW ZEALAND. CLAIRE ELIZABETH ROBINSON 2006 i ABSTRACT This thesis proposes an alternative way of establishing a link between market orientation and electoral success, by focusing on market orientation as a message instead of as a management function. Using interpretive textual analysis the thesis examines the advertising messages of the highest polling political parties for evidence of voter orientation and competitor orientation in the 1999 and 2002 New Zealand general election campaigns. Relating manifest market orientation to a number of statistical indicators of electoral success the thesis looks for plausible associations between the visual manifestation of market orientation in political advertisements and parties’ achievement of their party vote goals in the 1999 and 2002 elections. It offers party-focused explanations for electoral outcomes to complement existing voter-centric explanations, and adds another level of scholarly understanding of recent electoral outcomes in New Zealand. While the thesis finds little association between demonstration ofcompetitor orientation in political advertisements and electoral success, it finds a plausible relationship between parties that demonstrated a voter orientation in their political advertisements and goal achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism and Electoral Politics in New Zealand
    A POPULIST EXCEPTION? THE 2017 NEW ZEALAND GENERAL ELECTION A POPULIST EXCEPTION? THE 2017 NEW ZEALAND GENERAL ELECTION EDITED BY JACK VOWLES AND JENNIFER CURTIN Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463854 ISBN (online): 9781760463861 WorldCat (print): 1178915541 WorldCat (online): 1178915122 DOI: 10.22459/PE.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press Cover photograph: Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Green Party leader James Shaw standing in ‘unity’ at the stand up after the ‘Next steps in Government’s Plan for NZ’ speech at AUT, Auckland. © Stuff Limited. This edition © 2020 ANU Press CONTENTS List of Figures and Tables . vii Acknowledgements . xiii Jennifer Curtin and Jack Vowles The Populist Exception? The 2017 New Zealand General Election . 1 Jack Vowles, Jennifer Curtin and Fiona Barker 1 . Populism and Electoral Politics in New Zealand . 9 Fiona Barker and Jack Vowles 2 . Populism and the 2017 Election—The Background . 35 Jack Vowles 3 . Measuring Populism in New Zealand . 71 Lara Greaves and Jack Vowles 4 . Populism, Authoritarianism, Vote Choice and Democracy . 107 Jack Vowles 5 . Immigration and Populism in the New Zealand 2017 Election . 137 Kate McMillan and Matthew Gibbons 6 . Gender, Populism and Jacinda Ardern . 179 Jennifer Curtin and Lara Greaves 7 .
    [Show full text]
  • Can the Decline of the Labor Movement Be Stopped?
    however, Canadian unions have moved New Leadership, Democracy from representing 25 percent of the work and Solidarity Needed force to 32 percent while facing similar economic trends. And in fact, most of the Can the Decline of the Labor gains in terms of union membership in the last 20 years in the U.S. have been Movement Be Stopped? among workers in the service sector, pri­ marily women. Unions have declined in part because By SUZANNE FORSYTH DORAN the year 2000 five percent or less of the the right to organize and bargain collec­ private sector will be unionized, the low­ tively—won only after major union vic­ y now it is fast becoming old news est level since the labor movement began tories during the 1930s—has been sys­ that American labor is in worse in the late 19th century. tematically subverted. Workers face the B shape today than it was 60 years There has been a lot of speculation in prospect of being fired, harassed and ago. In 1932, three years before passage both the mainstream and left press that otherwise intimidated by virtually of the National Labor Relations Act le­ this decline is inevitable because changes unrestrained employers. At least one in galized the right of working people to or­ in the economy have eroded labor’s tradi­ 20 workers who wants to join a union is ganize unions and bargain collectively, tional base of membership—shrinking jobs fired. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), ostensibly created to protect workers’ rights, delays conducting elec­ olitics tions and certifying victories, and hasn’t P hit employers who violate labor laws with ndepcdent /I Continued on page 11 his C lex A INSIDE: SOUTH AFRICA PAGE 3 BEHIND THE BOSNIA- HERZEGOVINA CRISIS PAGE 6 FEATURE: ECONOMY AND HEALTH CARE PAGE 16 about 15 percent of the private sector work in basic industry while the service sector AN AMERICAN UNIONIST force belonged to unions.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Left? an Exploration of Social Movements, the Left And
    What’s Left? An exploration of social movements, the Left and activism in New Zealand Today. By Dylan Taylor A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Sociology Victoria University of Wellington View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchArchive at Victoria University of Wellington 2008 Abstract Surveys of the situation and prospects of the contemporary Left over the past three decades have frequently underscored themes of fragmentation, decline, even terminal demise. This thesis explores the question of the contemporary Left through interviews conducted with participants in New Zealand social movements. The general theoretical literature around the Left and social movements has consistently highlighted a number of social changes and challenges facing the Left today: the split between old and new Lefts following the rise of the new social movements; economic transformation (for instance, post-Fordism), and changes in class composition; the rise of neo-liberalism, and the dislocating effects of globalization; intellectual challenges, such as the demise of Marxism and the rise of post-modern philosophy; challenges to the state, and the arrival of a “post-political” condition. Analysis of the New Zealand literature around the Left and social movements shows congruent arguments and themes, as well as suggesting Antipodean specificities. To examine these contentions, a series of interviews were conducted with participants in “Left” social movements. These interviews suggest both congruence with some of the arguments in the literature and complexities that do not confirm these generalizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Park Tax’ Proposal
    TAX RATIONALITY, POLITICS, AND MEDIA SPIN: A CASE STUDY OF THE FAILED ‘CAR PARK TAX’ PROPOSAL WORKING PAPER SERIES Working Paper No. 102 May 2016 Jonathan Barrett & John Veal Correspondence to: Jonathan Barrett Email: [email protected] Centre for Accounting, Governance and Taxation Research School of Accounting and Commercial Law Victoria University of Wellington PO Box 600, Wellington, NEW ZEALAND Tel: + 64 4 463 5078 Fax: + 64 4 463 5076 Website: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/sacl/cagtr/ TAX RATIONALITY, POLITICS, AND MEDIA SPIN: A CASE STUDY OF THE FAILED ‘CAR PARK TAX’ PROPOSAL by Jonathan Barrett, School of Accounting and Commercial Law, Victoria University of Wellington John Veal, School of Business, Open Polytechnic 1 TAX RATIONALITY, POLITICS, AND MEDIA SPIN: A CASE STUDY OF THE FAILED ‘CAR PARK TAX’ PROPOSAL ABSTRACT The Generic Tax Policy Process (“GTPP”) is designed to ensure open and consultative development of tax policy and law in New Zealand. Despite complying with the GTPP, a proposal to extend fringe benefit tax to certain employer-funded car parking was withdrawn in the face of media criticism. This paper uses the failed ‘car park tax’ proposal as a case study to illustrate how a rational development process, such as GTPP, is insufficient in tax discourse. Government also needs to “out spin” its opponents. This paper outlines the GTPP and the progress of the “car park tax” proposal through that process. The paper then tells the story of the proposal’s failure using a timeline which focuses on print media reports. The proposal was flawed in certain regards; nevertheless this narrative demonstrates the ineffective “spinning” of the proposal to the media and public, and, in contrast, the effective opposition by an alliance of special interest groups.
    [Show full text]