Maya Civilisation Module Handbook Term II 2020-21 Year 2/3 Module Option, 0.5 Unit, 15 Credits

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

UCL Institute of Archaeology ARCL0053 Maya Civilisation Module Handbook Term II 2020-21 Year 2/3 module option, 0.5 Unit, 15 credits We try to be as accurate as possible with the information in this handbook. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, there may be changes during the course of the term. Just a reminder from wise old Ixchel and me, the Snake-on-Top, that things might change. Check for updates at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/students / The goddess Ix Chel From the Dresden Codex Prerequisite: ARCL0053 Archaeology of Mesoamerica Live stream: Friday 1-3pm Course co-ordinator: Prof. Elizabeth Graham with invaluable assistance from Panos Kratimenos Office hours: No set office hours – booking link is: https://outlook.office365.com/owa/calendar/[email protected]/bookings/ E-mail: [email protected] Refer to the IoA home page (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/current-students) for links to the IoA Student Handbook & IoA Study Skills Guide. See Section 2, below, for details. Moodle is the main software format for this course. Information will be regularly posted by Liz in the Announcements on Moodle (at the top), and you will receive an automatic email notification with her words of wisdom. You cannot reply to these emails via Moodle but you can e-mail Liz (or Panos) directly if you have a question. Zoom is used for live classes. 2020-21, ARCL0053, Maya Civilisation, Page 2 Module description This course builds on the archaeology of Mesoamerica and provides an examination in greater depth of Maya history, archaeology, ethnohistory, calendrics and epigraphy (the decipherment of hieroglyphic inscriptions). Aims This course is an introduction to the civilisation of the Precolumbian Maya. I expect that students will already have taken the course on the Archaeology of Mesoamerica, ARCL0031, and will be familiar with Mesoamerica as a culture area. If not, the encyclopedias or handbooks listed in Section No.3, below, are the best sources available online. The best text, also listed in Section No. 3, is only in print: Susan Toby Evans’ on Ancient Mexico and Central America of which there are three editions; any is fine. This book is different from the encyclopedia that Susan and her husband David Webster have published, which is probably also good, but is also only in print. My aim is to provide an overview of Maya culture, society, environment, food production, settlement patterns, architecture, calendrics, and aspects of material culture to increase awareness of the importance of Maya contributions to civilisation. I also hope to increase awareness of the rich cultural heritage of living Maya groups. Objectives On successful completion of the course, a student should have developed a basic knowledge of: 1) approaches to excavation and recovery in wet tropical environments, 2) human-environmental interaction in the humid tropics, 3) how data from archaeology, epigraphy, ethnohistory, and ethnography are integrated, 4) the nature of the colonial encounter, and 4) Maya culture history. Learning outcomes in terms of key skills On successful completion of the course, students should demonstrate: • Meticulous citation and referencing practices • Expository writing skills • A good level of research skills • Critical skills, particularly regarding source materials and their use, as well as authors’ claims. (Except mine which are always right.) Methods of assessment Two assignments. See below under No. 2, ASSESSMENT for details. Week-by-week summary (Lectures by E. Graham; P. Kratimenos and possibly guest lecturers will contribute.) Week Date Topic 1 15 January Introduction to the course 2 22 January Environment and resources of the Maya area 3 29January The earliest Maya and the rise of Maya civilisation 4 05 February Maya thought, beliefs & culture 5 12 February The social and political landscapes 6 15-19 February R E A D I N G W E E K 7 26 February The Early Classic and Teotihuacan 8 05 March Late Classic apogee of Maya civilisation 9 12 March The Terminal Classic & the Maya collapse, warfare 10 19 March The Postclassic – still lots of fighting 11 26 March The Conquest (or not?) of the Maya area 2020-21, ARCL0053, Maya Civilisation, Page 3 Weekly module plan Pre-recorded powerpoint lectures (via Lecturecast/Echo360) will be made available (asynchronous) for most weeks. These will be posted on Moodle by week and topic. No asynchronous lecture is posted for the first week and, depending on when assignments are due, there may be other weeks with no asynchronous lectures. Weekly live classes are given via Zoom, which can be accessed each week on the class Moodle page. If you find you need a password, use ajaw. You will also be expected to: • Complete weekly readings • Post questions in Hot Questions weekly • Attend the Friday live class from 1 to 3pm • Participate in discussion, both in class and in Breakout Rooms • Learn to dance (only kidding but not a bad idea) • . and if I get the software organised, you will be able to comment on the readings and some visual content. Workload This is a 15-credit course which equates to 150 hours of learning time including session preparation, background reading, and researching and writing assignments. • Weekly live-streamed class/seminar (questions, discussion) = 20 hrs. • Self-guided preparation (reviewing weekly pre-recorded lectures) = 30 hrs. • Weekly readings = 30 hrs. • Preparing discussion questions, short assignments, other online activities = 20 hrs. • Required essays = 50 hrs. TOTAL = 150 hrs. 2. ASSESSMENT Methods of assessment Given word Allowable Normally there are two essays worth 50% each, with each essay 2,500 words. count However, there are changes this term to reduced word counts, so we will discuss 5,000 4,750-5,250 this in class. See the following page for the First Assignment of 1,500 words. 4,500 4,275-4,725 Provisional due dates are: 4,000 3,800-4,200 First assignment: Friday 26th February 2021 3,500 3,325-3,675 Second essay: Friday 16th April 2021 3,000 2,850-3,150 In addition 2,500 2,375-2,625 You are required to post Hot Questions. I will keep track. I expect questions for a 2,000 1,900-2,100 minimum of 70% of lectures. If it falls below this, you will have 2% deducted from 1,500 1,425-1,575 your final mark. 1,000 950-1,050 Essay guidance as well as suggested questions for the Second essay are posted in Moodle in a separate document. You can also come up with your own essay question, but it must be approved by me (EG) first. More on this in class. 2020-21, ARCL0053, Maya Civilisation, Page 4 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ FIRST ASSIGNMENT, 1,500 WORDS, 40% OF FINAL MARK Choose one of the following: (Hint: headings, captions for pictures, in-text citations and references do not count in the word count. Also, I will not count the short Introduction as I’ve asked you to repeat the question there.) No. 1: How does the Maya calendar compare with other kinds of calendrical reckoning? Compare the Maya calendar with a calendar/number system of another civilisation which you have studied. (Could be what is used today.) What are the respective symbols used for counting? What are the cycles used to measure time? Days? Units longer than days? Do you know where the cycles come from? (e.g. planetary bodies? Human body cycles?) Do the numerical bases, or the base units, of the systems differ? By this I mean, are all systems counts of days or are other units of time used (e.g., what we call the ‘year’)? Include a short Introduction which informs the reader how you will lay out the essay. Structure the content with headings. At the end, summarise what you see as the same or different about the systems, and hazard a guess as to why differences may have emerged. Cite all sources with a list of References at the end. No. 2: How helpful—or not—is information on the web about the Maya? Why? • What kinds of web sites come up when you enter ‘Maya archaeology’ or ‘Maya civilization’? • How would you categorise the sites? (Just by broad categories is fine.) • You don’t have the time to do statistics, but what are the themes/topics/beliefs or statements about the Maya that come up most frequently? • What criteria can you use to assess the accuracy or truth of the statements? • What do your results tell us about popular conceptions of the Pre-Columbian Maya? • What are the implications of the accuracy and focus of these conceptions in terms of how we understand the Precolumbian past? Start with a short Introduction in which you tell the reader how you will address the topic—that is, the order of the parts of your essay. Structure the content with headings. For a conclusion or summary, address the final two criteria, above. Cite all sources with a list of References at the end. No. 3: What significance do particular kinds or classes of artefact have in Maya civilisation? • Select a particular kind or class of artefact such as (but not necessarily limited to, but clear your choice with us if it does not appear below): Censers (incensarios) Shell Polychrome plates/dishes plaque Polychrome cylinder vases from Tula Incised conch (Strombus sp.) shells (McVicker Jade pendants and Palka 2001) Spondylus (Thorny oyster) shells Chert (flint) eccentrics (sculptures) – (can include obsidian) Obsidian prismatic blades Stingray spines Animal or human bones (that are artefacts—that is, carved or incised) • Define the kind of artefact you have selected. For example, look up how a ‘censer’ or ‘pendant’ is defined.
Recommended publications
  • Ancient Maya Afterlife Iconography: Traveling Between Worlds

    Ancient Maya Afterlife Iconography: Traveling Between Worlds

    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2006 Ancient Maya Afterlife Iconography: Traveling Between Worlds Mosley Dianna Wilson University of Central Florida Part of the Anthropology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Wilson, Mosley Dianna, "Ancient Maya Afterlife Iconography: Traveling Between Worlds" (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 853. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/853 ANCIENT MAYA AFTERLIFE ICONOGRAPHY: TRAVELING BETWEEN WORLDS by DIANNA WILSON MOSLEY B.A. University of Central Florida, 2000 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Liberal Studies in the College of Graduate Studies at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2006 i ABSTRACT The ancient Maya afterlife is a rich and voluminous topic. Unfortunately, much of the material currently utilized for interpretations about the ancient Maya comes from publications written after contact by the Spanish or from artifacts with no context, likely looted items. Both sources of information can be problematic and can skew interpretations. Cosmological tales documented after the Spanish invasion show evidence of the religious conversion that was underway. Noncontextual artifacts are often altered in order to make them more marketable. An example of an iconographic theme that is incorporated into the surviving media of the ancient Maya, but that is not mentioned in ethnographically-recorded myths or represented in the iconography from most noncontextual objects, are the “travelers”: a group of gods, humans, and animals who occupy a unique niche in the ancient Maya cosmology.
  • With the Protection of the Gods: an Interpretation of the Protector Figure in Classic Maya Iconography

    With the Protection of the Gods: an Interpretation of the Protector Figure in Classic Maya Iconography

    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2012 With The Protection Of The Gods: An Interpretation Of The Protector Figure In Classic Maya Iconography Tiffany M. Lindley University of Central Florida Part of the Anthropology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Lindley, Tiffany M., "With The Protection Of The Gods: An Interpretation Of The Protector Figure In Classic Maya Iconography" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 2148. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2148 WITH THE PROTECTION OF THE GODS: AN INTERPRETATION OF THE PROTECTOR FIGURE IN CLASSIC MAYA ICONOGRAPHY by TIFFANY M. LINDLEY B.A. University of Alabama, 2009 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2012 © 2012 Tiffany M. Lindley ii ABSTRACT Iconography encapsulates the cultural knowledge of a civilization. The ancient Maya of Mesoamerica utilized iconography to express ideological beliefs, as well as political events and histories. An ideology heavily based on the presence of an Otherworld is visible in elaborate Maya iconography. Motifs and themes can be manipulated to convey different meanings based on context.
  • The Rulers of Palenque a Beginner’S Guide

    The Rulers of Palenque a Beginner’S Guide

    The Rulers of Palenque A Beginner’s Guide By Joel Skidmore With illustrations by Merle Greene Robertson Citation: 2008 The Rulers of Palenque: A Beginner’s Guide. Third edition. Mesoweb: www. mesoweb.com/palenque/resources/rulers/PalenqueRulers-03.pdf. Publication history: The first edition of this work, in html format, was published in 2000. The second was published in 2007, when the revised edition of Martin and Grube’s Chronicle of the Maya Kings and Queens was still in press, and this third conforms to the final publica- tion (Martin and Grube 2008). To check for a more recent edition, see: www.mesoweb.com/palenque/resources/rulers/rulers.html. Copyright notice: All drawings by Merle Greene Robertson unless otherwise noted. Mesoweb Publications The Rulers of Palenque INTRODUCTION The unsung pioneer in the study of Palenque’s dynastic history is Heinrich Berlin, who in three seminal studies (Berlin 1959, 1965, 1968) provided the essential outline of the dynasty and explicitly identified the name glyphs and likely accession dates of the major Early and Late Classic rulers (Stuart 2005:148-149). More prominent and well deserved credit has gone to Linda Schele and Peter Mathews (1974), who summarized the rulers of Palenque’s Late Classic and gave them working names in Ch’ol Mayan (Stuart 2005:149). The present work is partly based on the transcript by Phil Wanyerka of a hieroglyphic workshop presented by Schele and Mathews at the 1993 Maya Meet- ings at Texas (Schele and Mathews 1993). Essential recourse has also been made to the insights and decipherments of David Stuart, who made his first Palenque Round Table presentation in 1978 at the age of twelve (Stuart 1979) and has recently advanced our understanding of Palenque and its rulers immeasurably (Stuart 2005).
  • What Maya Collapse? Terminal Classic Variation in the Maya Lowlands

    What Maya Collapse? Terminal Classic Variation in the Maya Lowlands

    J Archaeol Res (2007) 15:329–377 DOI 10.1007/s10814-007-9015-x ORIGINAL PAPER What Maya Collapse? Terminal Classic Variation in the Maya Lowlands James J. Aimers Published online: 17 August 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 Abstract Interest in the lowland Maya collapse is stronger than ever, and there are now hundreds of studies that focus on the era from approximately A.D. 750 to A.D. 1050. In the past, scholars have tended to generalize explanations of the collapse from individual sites and regions to the lowlands as a whole. More recent approaches stress the great diversity of changes that occurred across the lowlands during the Terminal Classic and Early Postclassic periods. Thus, there is now a consensus that Maya civilization as a whole did not collapse, although many zones did experience profound change. Keywords Maya Á Collapse Á Terminal Classic–Early Postclassic Introduction ‘‘Much has been published in recent years about the collapse of Maya civilization and its causes. It might be wise to preface this chapter with a simple statement that in my belief no such thing happened’’ (Andrews IV 1973, p. 243). More than three decades after Andrews made this statement, interest in the lowland Maya collapse is more intense than ever. Of the more than 400 books, chapters, or articles of which I am aware, over half were published in the last ten years. As always, speculation about the collapse follows contemporary trends (Wilk 1985), and widespread concern over war and the physical environment have made the lowland Maya into a cautionary tale for many (Diamond 2005; Gibson 2006; J.
  • The Investigation of Classic Period Maya Warfare at Caracol, Belice

    The Investigation of Classic Period Maya Warfare at Caracol, Belice

    The Investigation of Classic Period Maya Warfare at Caracol, Belice ARLEN F. CHASE DIANE Z. CHASE University of Central Florida Prior to the 1950s the prevalent view of the like rulers who were concerned whith preserving ancient Maya was as a peaceful people. ln 1952, their histories in hieroglyphic texts on stone and Robert Rands completed his Ph. D. thesis on the stucco; investigations at the site have thus far evidences of warfare in Classic Maya art, following uncovered some 40 carved monuments (Beetz and up on the important work just completed by Tatia- Satterthwaite 1981; A. Chase and D. Chase na Proskouriakoff (1950). Since then, research has 1987b). Caracol is unusual, however, in having rapidly accumulated substantial documentation left us written records that it successfully waged that the Maya were in fact warlike (cf. Marcus warfare against two of its neighboring polities at 1974; Repetto Tio 1985). There is now evidence different times within the early part of the Late for the existence of wars between major political Classic Period. units in the Maya area and, importantly, Maya There are two wars documented in the hiero- kingship has also been shown to be inextricably glyphic texts: Caracol defeats Tikal in 9.6.8.4.2 or joined with concepts of war, captives, and sacrifice A. D. 562 (A. Chase and D. Chase 1987a:6, (Demarest 1978; Schele and Miller 1986; Freidel 1987b:33,60; S. Houston in press) and Naranjo in 1986). Warfare also has been utilized as a power- 9.9.18.16.3 or A. D. 631 (Sosa and Reents 1980).
  • The Mayan Gods: an Explanation from the Structures of Thought

    The Mayan Gods: an Explanation from the Structures of Thought

    Journal of Historical Archaeology & Anthropological Sciences Review Article Open Access The Mayan gods: an explanation from the structures of thought Abstract Volume 3 Issue 1 - 2018 This article explains the existence of the Classic and Post-classic Mayan gods through Laura Ibarra García the cognitive structure through which the Maya perceived and interpreted their world. Universidad de Guadalajara, Mexico This structure is none other than that built by every member of the human species during its early ontogenesis to interact with the outer world: the structure of action. Correspondence: Laura Ibarra García, Centro Universitario When this scheme is applied to the world’s interpretation, the phenomena in it and de Ciencias Sociales, Mexico, Tel 523336404456, the world as a whole appears as manifestations of a force that lies behind or within Email [email protected] all of them and which are perceived similarly to human subjects. This scheme, which finds application in the Mayan worldview, helps to understand the personality and Received: August 30, 2017 | Published: February 09, 2018 character of figures such as the solar god, the rain god, the sky god, the jaguar god and the gods of Venus. The application of the cognitive schema as driving logic also helps to understand the Maya established relationships between some animals, such as the jaguar and the rattlesnake and the highest deities. The study is part of the pioneering work that seeks to integrate the study of cognition development throughout history to the understanding of the historical and cultural manifestations of our country, especially of the Pre-Hispanic cultures.
  • Maya Medicine*

    Maya Medicine*

    MAYA MEDICINE* by FRANCISCO GUERRA THE traditional dependence of the European historian on cultural patterns developed by Mediterranean civilizations tends to disregard pre-Columbian achievements in the New World. Our main cultural stream had its source around the 3rd millennium B.C. in the Nile, Euphrates and Indus valleys, when the oldest civilizations developed an agriculture based on artificial irrigation. Egyptians and Hindus worked metals, used beasts of burden and the plough, and established a system of writing; the Sumerians added to all these technical achievements the principle of the wheel. New World Civilizations In that far-off age the American Indians were still migrating southwards and establishing themselves in territories where domestication of maize became possible. To the three great American civilizations-Maya, Aztec and Inca- the wheel, the plough, iron implements, and the use of beasts of burden remained unknown until the arrival of the Europeans, although the Inca made limited use of the llama. A true system of writing going beyond pictographic representation was attained only by the Maya, but the Aztec reached the greatest military and political power without any such advances. Despite these technical limitations the pre-Columbian Americans could claim in a few instances some intellectual superiority over the Old World. The Maya possessed a philosophical outlook on life, a sense of balance, of architectural perfection and an unquestioned mathematical accomplishment which made them, so to speak, the Greeks of the New World. In the same way, the political enterprises of the Aztecs may be compared with those of the Romans; and carrying the simile a step farther we could find a parallel of agressiveness between Incas and Carthaginians.
  • Ancient Maya Territorial Organisation of Central Belize: Confluence of Archaeological and Epigraphic Data

    Ancient Maya Territorial Organisation of Central Belize: Confluence of Archaeological and Epigraphic Data

    Contributions in New World Archaeology 4: 59–90 ANCIENT Maya Territorial Organisation OF CENTRAL BELIZE: CONFLUENCE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND EPIGRAPHIC Data CHRISTOPHE HELMKE1, JAIME AWE2 1 University of Copenhagen, Denmark 2 Institute of Archaeology, Belize Abstract The models proposed for ancient Maya territorial organization in central Belize differ significantly from one researcher to another. Due to the relative dearth of hieroglyphic data, most models have been formulated on the basis of archaeological data alone and are predominantly site-specific assessments. Investigations in central Belize over the past four decades have, however, brought to light several key pieces of epigraphic data, including Emblem Glyphs. When viewed in conjunction, the archaeological and epigraphic data provide a new vantage for determining the structure of the Classic-period socio-political landscape of the Belize Valley. Resumen Los modelos propuestos para la organización territorial de los mayas del Período Clásico en Belice Central difieren significativamente de un investigador a otro. Debido a la escasez de datos jeroglíficos, la mayoría de los modelos se han formulado teniendo en cuenta tan solo datos arqueológicos y se centran predominantemente sobre cada sitio investigado. Las exploraciones en Belice Central de las cuatro últimas décadas, sin embargo, han sacado a la luz numerosas piezas clave que aportan datos epigráficos, incluyendo Glifos Emblema. Vistos en conjunto, los datos arqueológicos y epigráficos proporcionan una posición más ventajosa en la determinación de la estructura del paisaje socio-político del Período Clásico del Valle de Belice. INTRODUCTION A variety of models of ancient Maya territorial organisation have been proposed for the Belize Valley over the past four decades.
  • Courtly Art of the Ancient Maya. A

    Courtly Art of the Ancient Maya. A

    those who commissioned the works. Many have inscribed dates calcu­ lated accord ing to the Long Count, a way of marki ng historical time that scholarsfirst identified in the 1960s. One carved limestone hiero­ glyphic inscription on a lintel from Yaxchilan includes a date that is equivalent to Feb. 11,526, when K'inich Tatb'u Skull II,a ruler of this northern Guatemalan city-state, ascended to the throne. The Long Count began on a specific day in the year 3114 B.C., when, the Maya believed, their gods extracted blood from themselves and mi xed it with cornmeal to make humans. K'inich Tatb'u Skull II and other lords had Long Co unt dates carved on public wo rks both to locate themselves within historical time and to place themselves amo ng the gods, heroes and supernatural entities who had initiated and contin­ ued to perpetuate humanity. The text of this inscription is meticulously carved in so-called "full­ figure" form s ofanimalsand human faces, rather than the more frag­ mented shorthand of most Maya hieroglyphics. It reveals the essen­ tially hybrid and multivalent nature of Maya writing, filled with Three eccentric fl ints, Centro Regional, Copan, Honduras, ca. 755 A.D., combinations of animate and inanimate elements that stand for (left to right) J2 '/" 13 '/, and 10%inches high. Institu te Hondureiio de Antropologia e His toria, Tegucigalpa. sound, word or symbol [see sidebarJ. Just as Maya inscriptions can be intricately visual, so can visual representations be calligraphic, as in a number of so-called "eccen­ competitive ly pressuring each other to attain ever higher levels of tric" flints on view.
  • Wayeb Notes No. 37

    Wayeb Notes No. 37

    f No. 37, 2011 WAYEB NOTES ISSN 1379-8286 A LOOK AT THE ENIGMATIC "GI TITLE" ASSOCIATED WITH THE MAYA WOMEN Boguchwała Tuszyńska Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland Many different titles used by the ancient Maya kings and nobles still remain poorly understood. Even if epigraphers are able to transliterate and transcribe some of them, their exact meaning and significance is not clear to us. It seems still more complicated in the case of titles that have not been fully deciphered, though at times it is possible to establish for what reason a specific title was held by a specific person. Such is the case with the so-called “vase title” (Proskouriakoff 1961). Even without an exact reading we know that this title was associated with Goddess O and was used by the Maya to designate married women, able to give birth (Colas 2004: xxiii). In the case of Maya women we have another enigmatic “godly title” found only in a few Classic period texts, known as the “GI title”. The title consists of three signs: 1) the undeciphered sign T217d, 2) the logogram T4 NAH and 3) the glyph representing the head of GI. The title is found in a few Early Classic texts (Boot 2001, Stuart 2005: 121) and Linda Schele considered it one of the name phrases of GI (Schele 1994). There are some glyphic variations of the title (Figure 1). The “hand” sign and the glyph NAH are sometimes accompanied only by the so-called “dotted” ajaw. In another example the “hand” sign and the logogram NAH are accompanied by the ajaw sign and the head of GI, and finally we have the “hand” sign attached to the logogram NAH and the head of GI.
  • Understanding the Archaeology of a Maya Capital City Diane Z

    Understanding the Archaeology of a Maya Capital City Diane Z

    Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology Volume 5 Archaeological Investigations in the Eastern Maya Lowlands: Papers of the 2007 Belize Archaeology Symposium Edited by John Morris, Sherilyne Jones, Jaime Awe and Christophe Helmke Institute of Archaeology National Institute of Culture and History Belmopan, Belize 2008 Editorial Board of the Institute of Archaeology, NICH John Morris, Sherilyne Jones, George Thompson, Jaime Awe and Christophe G.B. Helmke The Institute of Archaeology, Belmopan, Belize Jaime Awe, Director John Morris, Associate Director, Research and Education Brian Woodye, Associate Director, Parks Management George Thompson, Associate Director, Planning & Policy Management Sherilyne Jones, Research and Education Officer Cover design: Christophe Helmke Frontispiece: Postclassic Cao Modeled Diving God Figure from Santa Rita, Corozal Back cover: Postclassic Effigy Vessel from Lamanai (Photograph by Christophe Helmke). Layout and Graphic Design: Sherilyne Jones (Institute of Archaeology, Belize) George Thompson (Institute of Archaeology, Belize) Christophe G.B. Helmke (Københavns Universitet, Denmark) ISBN 978-976-8197-21-4 Copyright © 2008 Institute of Archaeology, National Institute of Culture and History, Belize. All rights reserved. Printed by Print Belize Limited. ii J. Morris et al. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to express our sincerest thanks to every individual who contributed to the success of our fifth symposium, and to the subsequent publication of the scientific contributions that are contained in the fifth volume of the Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology. A special thanks to Print Belize and the staff for their efforts to have the Symposium Volume printed on time despite receiving the documents on very short notice. We extend a special thank you to all our 2007 sponsors: Belize Communication Services Limited, The Protected Areas Conservation Trust (PACT), Galen University and Belize Electric Company Limited (BECOL) for their financial support.
  • Astronomy and the Iconography of Creation Among the Classic and Colonial Period Maya

    Astronomy and the Iconography of Creation Among the Classic and Colonial Period Maya

    Astronomy and the Iconography of Creation Among the Classic and Colonial Period Maya KHRISTAAN D. VILLELA and LINDA SCHELE University of Texas, Austin Westerners have been fascinated by the Period Maya. John Lloyd Stephens and others astronomical knowledge of the ancient Maya published accounts and views of the ruins of since travelers and scholars first reported ruined southern Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala, and cities in the Americas and Precolumbian manu- then British Honduras (Del Río and Cabrera scripts in European libraries. Beginning in the late 1822; Stephens 1841, 1843; Catherwood 1844; nineteenth century, students of the Maya speculat- Norman 1843; Charnay 1863, 1885; Maudslay ed on the astronomical identities of iconographic and Maudslay 1899). At the same time, academ- motifs and characters portrayed in the codices and ics and bibliophiles across the Atlantic discovered on monumental sculptures. In addition to identify- Precolumbian Maya codices and Colonial Spanish ing the signs for the sun, moon, and Venus, they accounts of the Maya. In Germany, Alexander von also produced tentative reconstructions of the Humboldt's account of travels in the New World Maya zodiac and other constellations. Alternate included the first publication of a Maya codex, interpretations of the nature of Maya astronomy five pages of the Dresden manuscript (Humboldt have appeared throughout this century. 1810:Plate 45). Humboldt's folio size work also Based on recent advances in our understand- first reproduced Maya art, a stucco relief from ing of the natural and astronomical foundations of Palenque (Humboldt 1810:Plate 11). In nearby Classic and Post-Classic Period Maya conceptions Paris, the Abbé Brasseur de Bourbourg published of Creation, we present another model of the so- the Quiché Maya Popol Vuh in 1861, and Diego called Maya zodiac.