Pennsylvania Superior Court Ceremonial Sessions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pennsylvania Superior Court Ceremonial Sessions Pennsylvania Superior Court Ceremonial Sessions _____________________ Commissioned Judges One through Sixty-Seven Edited by The Honorable John T.Bender Copyright © 2008 by The Pennsylvania Superior Court All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission of the editor. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN: 978-1-59571-336-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008939715 Word Association Publishers 205 Fifth Avenue Tarentum, Pennsylvania 15084 www.wordassociation.com This book is dedicated to my past, present and future colleagues who have enjoyed and will enjoy the privilege of service on the Pennsylvania Superior Court. Table of Contents Foreword 13 The Honorable Charles Edmund Rice, P.J.E. Memorial Service 15 The Honorable James Addams Beaver Memorial Service 18 The Honorable George B. Orlady, P.J.E. Biography 22 The Honorable John J. Wickham Memorial Service 27 The Honorable Edward N. Willard Biography 32 The Honorable Howard J. Reeder Memorial Service 36 The Honorable Henry J. McCarthy Biography 42 The Honorable Peter P.Smith Biography 46 The Honorable William W. Porter Biography 50 The Honorable William D. Porter, P.J.E. Memorial Service 55 The Honorable Dimner Beeber Biography 57 The Honorable John I. Mitchell Biography 62 The Honorable Thomas A. Morrison Biography 69 The Honorable John J. Henderson Memorial Service 73 The Honorable John B. Head Biography 75 The Honorable John W. Kephart Biography 79 The Honorable Frank M.Trexler, P.J.E. Biography 86 The Honorable J. Henry Williams Biography 90 The Honorable William H. Keller, P.J.E. Minutes in Memoriam 94 The Honorable William B. Linn Biography 105 The Honorable Robert S. Gawthrop Biography 110 The Honorable Jesse E.B. Cunningham Biography 115 The Honorable Thomas J. Baldridge, P.J.E. Biography 117 The Honorable J. Frank Graff Biography 121 The Honorable John G. Whitmore Biography 131 The Honorable James B. Drew Biography 134 The Honorable Joseph Stadtfeld Biography 140 The Honorable William M. Parker Biography 144 The Honorable Arthur H. James Biography 148 The Honorable Chester H. Rhodes, P.J.E. Biography 153 The Honorable William E. Hirt Biography 157 The Honorable Charles E. Kenworthey Biography 161 The Honorable Claude T.Reno Biography 165 The Honorable F. Clair Ross Memorial Service 169 The Honorable W. Heber Dithrich Memorial Service 172 The Honorable John C. Arnold Biography 178 The Honorable John S. Fine Biography 183 The Honorable Blair F. Gunther Biography 188 The Honorable J. Colvin Wright, P.J.E. Biography 193 The Honorable Robert E. Woodside Biography 197 The Honorable Harold L. Ervin, P.J.E. Biography 204 The Honorable Philip O. Carr Biography 208 The Honorable G. Harold Watkins, P.J.E. President Judge Induction Ceremony 210 The Honorable Harry M. Montgomery Portrait Presentation 218 Resolution 229 The Honorable Gerald F. Flood Memorial Service 232 The Honorable Robert Lee Jacobs, P.J.E. President Judge Induction Ceremony 234 The Honorable J. Sydney Hoffman Portrait Presentation Ceremony 241 Memorial Service 265 The Honorable Theodore O. Spaulding Biography 278 The Honorable John B. Hannum Biography 283 The Honorable William F. Cercone, P.J.E. Induction Ceremony 288 President Judge Induction Ceremony 296 Unveiling of the Portrait Ceremony 317 The Honorable Israel Packel Temple Law Review Dedication 336 The Honorable Edmund B. Spaeth, Jr., P.J.E. President Judge Induction Ceremony 351 Portrait Presentation Ceremony 368 The Honorable Gwilym A. Price Memorial Service 374 The Honorable Robert Van der Voort Induction Ceremony 389 Resolution 395 The Honorable John P.Hester Biography 398 The Honorable James R. Cavanaugh Memorial Service 403 The Honorable Richard Wickersham Biography 408 The Honorable John G. Brosky Presentation of the Portrait 413 Supreme Courtroom Final Session 435 The Honorable Judges: Richard DiSalle, Justin M. Johnson, Frank J. Montemuro, Zoran Popovich, Perry J. Shertz, and Donald E. Wieand Installation Ceremony 440 The Honorable Donald E. Wieand Installation Ceremony 467 The Honorable Frank J. Montemuro Presentation of the Portrait Ceremony 496 The Honorable Stephen J. McEwen, Jr., P.J.E. Presentation of the Portrait Ceremony 512 The Honorable Phyllis W. Beck Installation Ceremony 528 The Honorable Vincent A. Cirillo President Judge Installation Ceremony 547 Memorial Ceremony 564 Listing of Superior Court Judges Since 1895 580 Listing of President Judges 583 Acknowledgements 584 Foreword This project began in 2002 when then President Judge Joseph A. Del Sole asked me, as chairman of the Archives Committee, to compile the induction ceremonies of the Judges of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. During the process of gathering the induction ceremonies, it became obvious that once collected, we would need a method to preserve and to present the ceremonies. As progress was made, the project expanded to include photographs, other ceremonies and, in some cases, biographies of some of our Judges. The publishing of the accumulated material in this volume completes the task for the first sixty-seven judges of our Court. In this volume we have included photographs, biographies and all known ceremonial sessions relevant to our first sixty-seven commissioned judges. While we have attempted to be all inclusive, we were unable to find ceremonies for all Judges. In cases where a ceremony could not be found, we have used other appropriate writings or a biography highlighting that particular Judge’s career. The Honorable John T. Bender 87th Commissioned Judge of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania June 2008 Installations and Other Ceremonial Sessions of the Pennsylvania Superior Court 15 THE HONORABLE CHARLES EDMUND RICE September 15, 1846 – May 16, 1919 Assumed Office Date: June 28, 1895 President Judge 1895-1915 County: Luzerne MEMORIAL SERVICE And now, to wit: July 17, 1919, it is ordered, that, this statement, expressive of our sense of loss and appreciation of the life and character of the late President Judge CHARLES E. RICE, be spread at length on the records of the court. BY THE COURT. HONORABLE CHARLES EDMUND RICE died at Wilkes- Barre, May 16, 1919. He was born at Fairfield, Herkimer County, New York, September 15, 1846. His early years were spent as a country boy interested in all of the things that make youth of such a boy; gifted with a healthy body and an alert, receptive mind, charmed with sports and school service, and giving promise of a useful career in the world of men. He matured early, was graduated from Hamilton College in 1867, from the Albany Law School in 1869, and was admitted to the bar of Luzerne County the same year; serving as its district attorney from 16 Installations and Other Ceremonial Sessions of the Pennsylvania Superior Court 1877 to January 1, 1880. From that date to 1895, he was president judge of the courts of that judicial district. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania was constituted by an Act of June 24, 1895, P.L. 212. Judge RICE was commissioned as its president judge by Governor Daniel H. Hastings, to serve from July 1, 1895, until the first Monday in January, 1896. He was elected for the full term and commissioned to serve for ten years from the first Monday of January, 1896. He was again elected in 1905, and commissioned to serve for a period of ten years from the first Monday of January, 1906. He declined re-election, which was tendered to him open-handed by all the political parties of the State, accompanied by the unanimous request of the profession. It is impossible to put into words his service to the profession. He was never engaged in or identified with any business undertaking. The law was his mistress, and to her he rendered assiduous and loyal service. Guided by the simplest and kindliest ideals, with an entire absence of pretence he combined with the highest standard of clean living, a thorough and accurate knowledge of the law, and the ability to use it effectively in dealing with all complicated, legal problems. Neither public clamor nor personal friendship ever swerved him from the straight, clear line of official duty. His courage and loyalty to service were always consistent. As a fair illustration: When he was district attorney of Luzerne County, at the conclusion of a trial he stated to the court, “There should be no conviction.” Despite his protest, a conviction was secured. He refused to move for sentence, and on review by the Supreme Court, he appeared at its bar and stated, “That he was obliged to say under his oath of office, that there should have been no conviction.” The judgment was reversed in a scathing opinion by PAXSON, C.J., in which he said: “There was no evidence to justify the jury in rendering a verdict of guilty or the court in sustaining it. The jury were not only erroneously instructed upon the law, but were palpably misled by the comments of the court upon the evidence.” The record of such abuse of judicial power, and the courage of a conscientious district attorney is preserved for the profession in Pauli v. Commonwealth, 89 Pa. 432. He was regarded by the profession not only as an able jurist and honest man, but a firm, fair, and courtly administrator of the law. He believed in and exemplified the highest standards of private and public rectitude, and all who were brought Installations and Other Ceremonial Sessions of the Pennsylvania Superior Court 17 within the zone of his influence measured him as foremost of all their associates. His written language was a transcript of his mind, and he was studious that all things should be done uprightly, deliberately and resolutely. The names of the parties, of counsel, the court from which the appeal was taken, were irrelevant and immaterial matters in forming his conclusion.
Recommended publications
  • 2006 Annual Report
    2006 Annual Report Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Table of Contents 1SFTJEFOU+VEHFBOE%JTUSJDU$PVSU"ENJOJTUSBUPS 'JGUI+VEJDJBM%JTUSJDUPG1FOOTZMWBOJB+VEHFTPGUIF $PVSUPG$PNNPO1MFBTCZ%JWJTJPOBOE1IPUPHSBQI 5BCMFPG0SHBOJ[BUJPO $PVSU"ENJOJTUSBUJPO $SJNJOBM%JWJTJPO "EVMU1SPCBUJPO 'BNJMZ%JWJTJPO "EVMU4FDUJPO $IJMESFOT$PVSU +VWFOJMF4FDUJPO $JWJM%JWJTJPO 0SQIBOT$PVSU%JWJTJPO %JTUSJDU+VTUJDF$PVSUT +VEJDJBM5SBOTJUJPOT To the Citizens of Allegheny County We are pleased to present to the citizens of Allegheny County our 2006 Annual Report of Court operations. Joseph M. James Raymond L. Billotte President Judge District Court Administrator In February 2006, the Allegheny County Court of Common McClain, Ph.D., to facilitate the second annual high school Pleas began using the statewide Common Pleas Case education project in the city schools. This program, Management System (CPCMS) to manage and disseminate developed to educate students about the role of the courts Criminal Court case information. Allegheny County became in our society and their responsibilities as citizens, further the 59th of 60 judicial districts in Pennsylvania to “go-live” encourages students to participate in jury service by on CPCMS. An integrated case management system registering to vote. Common Pleas Court Judges visited 11 initiated by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, CPCMS was city high schools during the month of March 2006, created to facilitate secure, complete, timely and accurate impressing upon students the positive aspects of civic criminal justice information sharing among criminal justice responsibility. entities throughout the state. This system will eventually allow for access to certain information by the public. In December 2006, the Pretrial Services Agency was created to improve the Court’s ability to more closely The Court sponsored its first Juror Appreciation Day in May monitor defendants released on bail and coordinate pretrial 2006 in conjunction with Governor Ed Rendell, the services among various programs.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Police Brutality in News Media
    1 An Investigation of Police Brutality in News Media Media Narratives and Narrative Icons as Argumentation and Communal Identity Douglas Phillips 2 Abstract This dissertation explores the ways in which narratives about decisive events coalesce in news media discourse, and how they function rhetorically. Specifically, this study examines how journalists frame stories about police brutality, how those frames construct versions of public narratives, and how those narrative versions can be used in discourse about issues of civic concern such as support for new community policing policies or opposition to Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law. I show how journalists’ choice of semantic frames (e.g., racism, police-community relations, or criminal justice) helps to shape readers’ understanding of the events and contributes to the formation of a narrative icon, a word, name, or short phrase that, absent narrative detail, indexes particular versions of a broader cultural narrative. This research is motivated by questions about the reciprocity between prior knowledge, audience expectations, and public discourse, and how those combine to shape or reinforce cultural values and communal identities. To explore these questions, I draw on scholarship in narrative theory, frame semantics, intertextual analysis, and argument. I analyze over 1,700 newspaper articles published in the Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles Sentinel, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, and New Pittsburgh Courier between 1991 and 2013 concerning incidents of police brutality, including Rodney King and Jonny Gammage, a Black man who died following a traffic stop in Pittsburgh, PA. My findings suggest three primary functions of narratives in news media discourse: as background information, as examples used to establish or illustrate a rule, or as points of comparison.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilian Conservation Corps at Camp SP-12, Fort Necessity, Farmington, PA
    TECHNICALINFORMATIONCENTE~ DENVERSERVICECENTER NATIONALPARKSERVICE - * FORT NECESSITY CIVILIAN CONSERVATIONCORPS CAMP SP-12 1935-1937 bY Larry N. Sypolt ~'November 15, 1988 Morgantown, WV I Preface This paper is meant to be an administrative history of the Civilian Conservation Corps at Camp SP-12, Fort Necessity, Farmington, PA. The CCC camp at Fort Necessity existed for only two and one-half years, from June 1935, through December 1937. This oral history project was conducted with people who served the CCC program at Fort Necessity during those years. I have gotten interviews from a camp advisor, camp military officer, local experienced man, work leader and enrollees, the purpose of which was to yet an idea of what this experience meant to people at all levels. The first section opens with a brief overview of the CCC program in general. No attempt was made here to tell its whole story, as many books have already been written on the subject. This overview is followed by the administrative history at Fort Necessity, with papers following that are of particular interest to the camp. The second section contains the edited transcripts of the interviews. It is followed by some written interviews sent by people some distance away or who were not available for an oral interview. A list of questions is contained with their answers. I would also like to take this time to thank all those who helped me with this~,"project. A special thanks to Bill Fink and his staff at -Fort Necessity National Battlefield for all of their ,,- help and cooperation. Last, but not least, a special thanks to my typist.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacies of the Nuremberg SS-Einsatzgruppen Trial After 70 Years
    Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Volume 39 Number 1 Special Edition: The Nuremberg Laws Article 7 and the Nuremberg Trials Winter 2017 Legacies of the Nuremberg SS-Einsatzgruppen Trial After 70 Years Hilary C. Earl Nipissing University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr Recommended Citation Hilary C. Earl, Legacies of the Nuremberg SS-Einsatzgruppen Trial After 70 Years, 39 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 95 (2017). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol39/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 07 EARL .DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 1/16/17 4:45 PM Legacies of the Nuremberg SS- Einsatzgruppen Trial after 70 Years HILARY EARL* I. INTRODUCTION War crimes trials are almost commonplace today as the normal course of events that follow modern-day wars and atrocities. In the North Atlantic, we use the liberal legal tradition to redress the harm caused to civilians by the state and its agents during periods of State and inter-State conflict. The truth is, war crimes trials are a recent invention. There were so-called war crimes trials after World War I, but they were not prosecuted with any real conviction or political will.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rights of the Press and the Closed Court Criminal Proceeding G
    Nebraska Law Review Volume 57 | Issue 2 Article 9 1978 The Rights of the Press and the Closed Court Criminal Proceeding G. Michael Fenner Creighton University School of Law, [email protected] James L. Koley Creighton University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Recommended Citation G. Michael Fenner and James L. Koley, The Rights of the Press and the Closed Court Criminal Proceeding, 57 Neb. L. Rev. 442 (1978) Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol57/iss2/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. By G. Michael Fenner* and James L. Koley** The Rights of the Press and the Closed Court Criminal Proceeding ARTICLE OUTLINE I. INTRODUCTION II. PROCEDURAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS A. The Application of Procedural Due Process Rights B. The Scope of the Right 1. "the private interest that will be affected by the official action" 2. "the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of addi- tional or substitute procedural safeguards" 3. "the government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail" C. Procedural Due Process: Conclusion III. SUBSTANTIVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS A. Closed Judicial Proceedings in Criminal Cases as Prior Restraints on News Reporting by the Media 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Taser Use: Report of the Use of Force Working Group of Allegheny County
    University of Pittsburgh School of Law Scholarship@PITT LAW Articles Faculty Publications 2010 Taser Use: Report of the Use of Force Working Group of Allegheny County David A. Harris University of Pittsburgh School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles Part of the Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, International Relations Commons, Law and Society Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation David A. Harris, Taser Use: Report of the Use of Force Working Group of Allegheny County, 71 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 719 (2010). Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/462 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship@PITT LAW. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@PITT LAW. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. REPORT TASER USE BY LAW ENFORCEMENT: REPORT OF THE USE OF FORCE WORKING GROUP OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA DavidA. Harris* PREFACE The Use of Force Working Group was convened at the request of Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala, Jr. The purpose of * Primary author: Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law. The Use of Force Working Group was convened in October of 2008, by Stephen A. Zappala, Jr., District Attorney of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, to study the use of TasersTm by law enforcement agencies in the county. Other members of the Working Group were John M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judge As Author / the Author As Judge, 40 Golden Gate U
    Golden Gate University Law Review Volume 40 | Issue 1 Article 3 January 2009 The udJ ge as Author / The Author sa Judge Ryan B. Witte Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev Part of the Judges Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Ryan B. Witte, The Judge as Author / The Author as Judge, 40 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. (2009). http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol40/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Golden Gate University Law Review by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Witte: The Judge as Author ARTICLE THE JUDGE AS AUTHOR I THE AUTHOR AS JUDGE RYAN BENJAMIN WI'lTE* INTRODUCTION For federal judges, a life tenure also comes with a lifelong publishing deal. Most judges remain faithful to the rigid framework of judicial opinion writing that dominates the shelves of law libraries throughout the country. But some judges utilize certain cases to summon their inner novelist or poet to add life and flavor to the pages of the case reporters. These judges are both authors and artists. The use of humor, poetry, and popular culture in judicial opinions has many benefits but is not without its critics. This Article analyzes the role of a judge as an author of judicial opinions and compares the costs and benefits of judges bringing their outside artistic skills and experience to bear on their judicial opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prosecutor and the Judge
    From Nuremberg and Tokyo Erasmus Prize 2009 to The Hague and Beyond ¶ verrijn stuart | simons Heikelina Verrijn Stuart and Marlise Simons benjamin ferencz, investigator of Nazi war crimes and prosecutor at Nuremberg. Author and lecturer. antonio cassese, first president of the Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and president of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. The Prosecutor The prestigious Praemium Erasmianum 2009 was awarded to Benjamin Ferencz and Antonio Cassese, who embody the history of international criminal law from and the Judge Nuremberg to The Hague. The Prosecutor and the Judge is a meeting with these two remarkable men through in depth interviews by Heikelina Verrijn Stuart and Marlise Simons about their judge and the e prosecutor ¶ work and ideas, about the war crimes trials, human cruelty, the self-interest of states; about remorse in the courtroom, about restitution and compensation for th victims and about the strength and the limitations of the international courts. Heikelina Verrijn Stuart is a lawyer and philosopher of law who has published extensively on international humanitarian and criminal law and on remorse, revenge and forgiveness. Since 1993 she has followed the international courts and tribunals for radio and television. Marlise Simons is a correspondent for The New York Times, who has written on conflicts and political murder, torture and disappearances from Latin America. For more than a decade, she has reported on international courts and tribunals in The Hague. Benjamin Ferencz and Antonio Cassese Interviews
    [Show full text]
  • The Eichmann Trial the Eichmann Trial
    The Eichmann Trial The Eichmann Trial EUROPEAN JEWRY BEFORE AND AFTER HITLER by SALO W. BARON A HISTORIAN, not an eyewitness or a jurist, I shall concern myself with the historical situation of the Jewish people before, during, and after the Nazi onslaught—the greatest catastrophe in Jewish history, which has known many catastrophes. A historian dealing with more or less contemporary problems con- fronts two major difficulties. The first is that historical perspective usu- ally can be attained only after the passage of time. The second is that much relevant material is hidden away in archives and private collec- tions, which are usually not open for inspection until several decades have passed. In this instance, however, the difficulties have been re- duced. The world has been moving so fast since the end of World War JJ, and the situation of 1961 so little resembles that of the 1930's, that one may consider the events of a quarter of a century ago as belonging almost to a bygone historic era, which the scholarly investigator can view with a modicum of detachment. In fact, a new generation has been growing up which "knew not Hitler." For its part, the older generation is often eager to forget the nightmare of the Nazi era. Hence that period has receded in the consciousness of man as if it had occurred long ago. This article is based on a memorandum that Professor Baron prepared for himself when he was invited to testify at the Eichmann trial, in April 1961, on the Jewish communities destroyed by the Nazis.
    [Show full text]
  • From Weimar to Nuremberg: a Historical Case Study of Twenty-Two Einsatzgruppen Officers
    FROM WEIMAR TO NUREMBERG: A HISTORICAL CASE STUDY OF TWENTY-TWO EINSATZGRUPPEN OFFICERS A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts James L. Taylor November 2006 This thesis entitled FROM WEIMAR TO NUREMBERG: A HISTORICAL CASE STUDY OF TWENTY-TWO EINSATZGRUPPEN OFFICERS by JAMES L. TAYLOR has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Norman J. W. Goda Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Abstract TAYLOR, JAMES L., M.A., November 2006, Modern European History FROM WEIMAR TO NUREMBERG: A HISTORICAL CASE STUDY OF TWENTY- TWO EINSATZGRUPPEN OFFICERS (134 pp.) Director of Thesis: Norman J. W. Goda This is an examination of the motives of twenty-two perpetrators of the Jewish Holocaust. Each served as an officer of the Einsatzgruppen, mobile killing units which beginning in June 1941, carried out mass executions of Jews in the German-occupied portion of the Soviet Union. Following World War II the subjects of this study were tried before a U.S. Military Tribunal as part of the thirteen Nuremberg Trials, and this study is based on the records of their trial, known as Case IX or more commonly as the Einsatzgruppen Trial. From these records the thesis concludes that the twenty-two men were shaped politically by their experiences during the Weimar Era (1919-1932), and that as perpetrators of the Holocaust their actions were informed primarily by the tenets of Nazism, particularly anti-Semitism.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania's Appellate Judges, 1969-1994
    Duquesne Law Review Volume 33 Number 3 Article 3 1995 Pennsylvania's Appellate Judges, 1969-1994 Jonathan P. Nase Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jonathan P. Nase, Pennsylvania's Appellate Judges, 1969-1994, 33 Duq. L. Rev. 377 (1995). Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol33/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Duquesne Law Review by an authorized editor of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. Duquesne Law Review Volume 33, Spring 1995, Number 3 Pennsylvania's Appellate Judges, 1969-1994 Jonathan P. Nase* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .............................. 378 H. Chronology of Judges ....................... 379 A. Supreme Court ........................ 380 1. Members of the Court ................ 380 2. Chief Justices ...................... 388 B. Superior Court ......................... 389 1. Members of the Court ................ 389 2. President Judges ................... 397 C. Commonwealth Court ................... 399 1. Members of the Court ................ 400 2. President Judges ................... 407 III. Statistical Miscellany ....................... 409 A. Methodology ........................... 410 B. All Appellate Judges Serving Between January 1, 1969 and August 1, 1994 ........ 411 1. Party Affiliation .................... 412 2. Race and Gender ................... 415 3. County and Region .................. 418 4. Reason for Leaving the Bench ......... 422 * B.A. American University; J.D. Duke University; Counsel, Legislative Bud- get and Finance Committee, Pennsylvania General Assembly. The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent the opinions of the Com- mittee, its individual members, or its staff. The author would like to thank Mr. Thomas B.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Sill Clark Papers
    Collection 1958 Joseph Sill Clark Papers 1947-1968 319 boxes, 224 lin. feet Contact: The Historical Society of Pennsylvania 1300 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107 Phone: (215) 732-6200 FAX: (215) 732-2680 http://www.hsp.org Inventoried by: Katerina Chruma Completed: December 2007 Restrictions: None © 2007 The Historical Society of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved Joseph Sill Clark Papers Collection 1958 Joseph Sill Clark Papers, 1947-1968 Collection 1958 319 boxes, 224 linear feet Creator: Clark, Joseph Sill, 1901-1990 Abstract Joseph Sill Clark was a Democratic reform politician from Philadelphia. Early in his career he served as campaign manager for Richardson Dilworth's mayoral campaign, 1947, and as Philadelphia city controller, 1950-1951. He served as mayor of Philadelphia, 1951-1956, and from 1957 to 1968 he was a United States senator from Pennsylvania. This collection is a partial record of Clark career. It consists primarily of material gathered by staff, reports, memoranda, clippings, news releases, articles, with some correspondence, all on issues and events with which Clark was involved. A small portion of the papers are concerned with Clark's early activities as campaign manager for Richardson Dilworth's mayoral campaign, 1947, and as Philadelphia city controller, 1950-1951, for which there are campaign and office files. Clark's records as mayor of Philadelphia, 1951-1956, include campaign papers, some general office files, and transcripts of speeches. The bulk of material covers Clark's years as United States senator from Pennsylvania, 1957-1968. There are papers for his three senatorial campaigns, 1956, 1962, and especially 1968. His Washington office general file reflects his interest in disarmament, the United Nations, Vietnam, and other matters before and after his appointment to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1965.
    [Show full text]