From Nuremberg and Tokyo Erasmus Prize 2009 to The Hague and Beyond ¶ verrijn stuart | simons Heikelina Verrijn Stuart and Marlise Simons benjamin ferencz, investigator of Nazi war crimes and prosecutor at Nuremberg. Author and lecturer. antonio cassese, first president of the Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and president of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. The Prosecutor The prestigious Praemium Erasmianum 2009 was awarded to Benjamin Ferencz and Antonio Cassese, who embody the history of international criminal law from and the Judge Nuremberg to The Hague. The Prosecutor and the Judge is a meeting with these two remarkable men through in depth interviews by Heikelina Verrijn Stuart and Marlise Simons about their judge and the e prosecutor ¶ work and ideas, about the war crimes trials, human cruelty, the self-interest of states; about remorse in the courtroom, about restitution and compensation for th victims and about the strength and the limitations of the international courts. Heikelina Verrijn Stuart is a lawyer and philosopher of law who has published extensively on international humanitarian and criminal law and on remorse, revenge and forgiveness. Since 1993 she has followed the international courts and tribunals for radio and television. Marlise Simons is a correspondent for The New York Times, who has written on conflicts and political murder, torture and disappearances from Latin America. For more than a decade, she has reported on international courts and tribunals in The Hague. Benjamin Ferencz and Antonio Cassese Interviews and Writings isbn 978 90 8555 023 5 www.aup.nl Verrijn Stuart & Simons DEF.indd 1 21-10-2009 21:36:30 The Prosecutor and the Judge VerrijnStuart DEF.indd 1 19-10-2009 22:14:23 VerrijnStuart DEF.indd 2 19-10-2009 22:14:23 The Prosecutor and the Judge benjamin ferencz and antonio cassese interviews and writings ¶ Heikelina Verrijn Stuart Marlise Simons VerrijnStuart DEF.indd 3 19-10-2009 22:14:25 Cover design and layout: Maedium, Utrecht isbn 978 90 8555 023 5 e-isbn 978 90 4851 133 4 nur 828 © Heikelina Verrijn Stuart & Marlise Simons / Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2009 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopy- ing, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. VerrijnStuart DEF.indd 4 19-10-2009 22:14:25 Contents Preface, meeting Benjamin Ferencz and Antonio Cassese [7] Heikelina Verrijn Stuart The Prosecutor: Interview with Benjamin Ferencz [13] Heikelina Verrijn Stuart and Marlise Simons The Judge: Interview with Antonio Cassese [47] Heikelina Verrijn Stuart and Marlise Simons ¶ benjamin ferencz Removing the Lock from the Courthouse Door Reconciling Legitimate Concerns [93] Compensating Victims of the Crimes of War [101] Seeking Redress for Hitler’s Victims (1948-1956) [117] ¶ antonio cassese Soliloqui My Early Years: Hesitating between Law and Humanities [143] Reflections on the Current Prospects of International Criminal Justice [171] Is the Bell Tolling for International Universality? A Plea for a Sensible Notion of Universal Jurisdiction [179] Index [189] VerrijnStuart DEF.indd 5 19-10-2009 22:14:25 VerrijnStuart DEF.indd 6 19-10-2009 22:14:25 Preface Meeting Benjamin Ferencz and Antonio Cassese Anyone who has met Benjamin Ferencz and Antonio Cassese knows that here are two men totally committed to the defense of human rights and human dignity. They are, by the strength of their personalities guides and tutors. They offer inspiration and an irresistible remedy against cynicism. Both men have many stories to tell about the power politics and self-interest of states and their leaders and about the excessive violence and cruelty indi- viduals can commit when they have the opportunity. But they also teach us that one need not be a blind optimist to go in search of direction and progress through law. For them to believe this is of itself no small achievement, since their work has confronted them with human behavior at its worst. This book is published to celebrate the Praemium Erasmianum awarded in November 2009 to Benjamin Ferencz, the former Nuremberg prosecu- tor, and Antonio Cassese, the first president of the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (icty) and current president of the Special Tribu- nal for Lebanon. The prosecutor and the judge together embody the history of international criminal law from Nuremberg to The Hague. The choice to interview the laureates was based first and foremost on the wish to introduce these two remarkable personalities, well-known among their colleagues in the lively international legal community, to a wider audience. The idea for this book is rooted in a book Antonio Cassese published in 1993. At the end of the 1970s, Cassese interviewed in depth the great Dutch international lawyer, B.V.A. Röling, who had been a judge at the Tokyo tri- bunal, the post Second World War International Military Tribunal for the Far East. For several reasons, the book was published much later, in the watershed year of 1993. In that year, the Tribunal for the former Yugosla- via was established by the un Security Council to try the war crimes being committed in the heart of Europe. To this day The Tokyo Trial and Beyond remains a treasure trove of observations and wisdom: many of the issues Cassese and Röling covered in their conversations have lost none of their VerrijnStuart DEF.indd 7 19-10-2009 22:14:25 8 | heikelina verrijn stuart urgency. Cassese’s connection with Röling was forged in scholarship and a clear-headed critical approach of international criminal law. By no coinci- dence, Ben Ferencz and Bert Röling also met in the course of their advocacy to have “aggression” properly defined by the United Nations. Both fiercely independent, they were deeply aware that every war brings about unspeak- able horrors and grief and should be prevented by all available means. The very first time I saw Ben Ferencz in action was in Rome in 1998. Within the span of five weeks the treaty for the International Criminal Court had to be hammered out. There was a strong sense of momentum, of now-or-never. Debates raged day and night, in the great conference rooms, in the back chambers and in the corridors. In the middle of it all Ferencz could be found, tirelessly canvassing unwilling or uninformed delegations. I saw government representatives, ngo members and journalists bestow their respect on this former Nuremberg prosecutor. And, Ferencz, who is not the most patient of men, showed an immense patience in his expla- nations of the complicated legal and political subjects at stake. The icc founding treaty came to pass. The crime of aggression made it to the final text only at the very last stage of the negotiations. But the crucial issue of the court’s jurisdiction over this crime was postponed. It may have been a blow for its champion, but Ben Ferencz saw it as another step forward, and he continued to explain, to lobby and to travel the world. It was hard to catch him in one place. With the review conference of the icc looming in 2010, he moved from meeting to lecture to conference, from New York to Saint Petersburg to Salzburg, always on the same mission, delivering his mantra: stop war. And, most immediately, he urges his audience: make it possible for the icc to prosecute crimes of aggression. At times during the interviews, when we expressed our concerns about legal and human shortcomings in the burgeoning icc, Ferencz plainly told us that we had our noses too close to the ground. We should take our distance. What may seem stagnation at the time can be seen as part of an important development with hindsight. Antonio Cassese came from international humanitarian law and human rights law to the new field of international criminal law. At one point in the interview he told us: “The body of international law is made up of a set of rules that gradually emerge, and as a result the common conscience of man- kind is found in customary international law.’’ Cassese pairs his conviction that the law of humanity is anything but a stagnant, unmovable system with his own deep awareness that the dignity of humanity is not safe in the hands of the state. At the same time he has an open mind for the many efforts by VerrijnStuart DEF.indd 8 19-10-2009 22:14:25 preface | 9 individuals representing the state to do what is right. He has a keen eye for the beauty and the power of the language of criminal law, with its precise definitions and qualifications. In his fourth report as president of the icty to the General Assembly of the un in 1997, Antonio Cassese quoted from Benjamin Ferencz’s statement given on 29 September 1947 in the Einsatzgruppen trial in Nuremberg: ‘If these men be immune, then law has lost its meaning, and man must live in fear.’ The judge sided with the prosecutor. After some years in Florence, Cassese was once again drawn to the epi- centre of international criminal law, the Dutch city of The Hague, this time as president of the Lebanon tribunal. His life often shifts among his many roles from being a judge on the bench to leading the un Commission of Enquiry on Darfur and then again to periods with a different perspective as scholar, teacher, editor, commentator and writer of innumerable articles and books. But never do these changes bring about disconnection.