Ten Tunnels Deviation Modifications Review of Environmental Factors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ten Tunnels Deviation Modifications Review of Environmental Factors New Intercity Fleet Ten Tunnels Deviation Modifications Review of Environmental Factors February 2018 New Intercity Fleet - Ten Tunnels Deviation Modifications Review of Environmental Factors Ref–5889221 Ten Tunnels Deviation Modifications - Review of Environmental Factors – January 2018 1 Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 6 Definitions ..................................................................................................................... 8 Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 11 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 16 1.1 Overview of the Project ............................................................................. 16 1.2 Location of the Project .............................................................................. 17 1.3 History of the Ten Tunnels Deviation ........................................................ 19 1.4 Existing infrastructure and land uses ........................................................ 19 1.5 Purpose of this Review of Environmental Factors ..................................... 24 2 Need for the Project .............................................................................................. 25 2.1 Strategic justification ................................................................................. 25 2.2 Need for the Project .................................................................................. 25 2.3 Operational needs .................................................................................... 26 2.4 Project options .......................................................................................... 26 3 Description of the Project ...................................................................................... 28 3.1 The Project ............................................................................................... 28 3.2 Construction activities ............................................................................... 42 3.3 Property acquisition .................................................................................. 47 3.4 Operation management and maintenance ................................................ 47 4 Statutory considerations ........................................................................................ 51 4.1 Commonwealth legislation ........................................................................ 51 4.2 NSW legislation and regulations ............................................................... 51 4.3 State Environmental Planning Policies ...................................................... 53 4.4 Local environmental planning instrument and development controls ......... 55 4.5 NSW Government policies and strategies ................................................. 56 4.6 Ecologically sustainable development ....................................................... 57 5 Community and stakeholder consultation .............................................................. 59 5.1 Stakeholder consultation during concept design ....................................... 59 5.2 Consultation requirements under the Infrastructure SEPP ........................ 59 5.3 Consultation strategy ................................................................................ 60 5.4 Public display ............................................................................................ 60 5.5 Aboriginal community involvement ............................................................ 61 5.6 Ongoing consultation ................................................................................ 61 6 Environmental impact assessment ........................................................................ 62 6.1 Non-Indigenous heritage ........................................................................... 62 6.2 Noise and vibration ................................................................................... 73 6.3 Traffic and transport .................................................................................. 82 6.4 Urban design, landscape and visual amenity ............................................ 85 6.5 Socio-economic impacts ........................................................................... 88 6.6 Indigenous heritage .................................................................................. 89 6.7 Biodiversity ............................................................................................... 90 6.8 Soils and water ......................................................................................... 93 6.9 Air quality .................................................................................................. 96 6.10 Other impacts ........................................................................................... 97 6.11 Cumulative impacts .................................................................................. 98 6.12 Climate change and sustainability ........................................................... 100 Ten Tunnels Deviation Modifications - Review of Environmental Factors – January 2018 2 7 Environmental management ................................................................................ 102 7.1 Environmental management plans .......................................................... 102 7.2 Mitigation measures ................................................................................ 102 8 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 111 References ............................................................................................................... 112 Appendix A Consideration of matters of National Environmental Significance ........ 114 Appendix B Consideration of clause 228 ................................................................ 115 Appendix C Neutral or beneficial effect assessment ............................................... 118 Appendix D Landscape and visual impact assessment .......................................... 120 Appendix E Threatened communities, flora and fauna tables ................................. 122 Appendix F Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 Assessments of Significance........ 143 Figures Figure 1 Planning approval and consultation process for the Project ......................................14 Figure 2 Regional context of the Project site ...........................................................................18 Figure 3 Generic long section (or side profile) of Tunnels 1 to 8 and 10 .................................20 Figure 4 Generic cross section of Tunnels 1 to 8 and 10 ........................................................20 Figure 5 View of Tunnel 1 showing the interface between brick and concrete linings..............21 Figure 6 View of Sydney end portal of Tunnel 7 ......................................................................21 Figure 7 Existing toe notching at internal safety refuge on down track wall of Tunnel 2 ..........22 Figure 8 View of cable tray and existing notching at Sydney end portal of Tunnel 3 ...............22 Figure 9 Detail of overhead wiring structures at Tunnel 8 .......................................................23 Figure 10 View of gradient / radius / survey marker in Tunnel 10 ............................................23 Figure 11 Image from the 3D tunnel survey ............................................................................28 Figure 12 Typical tunnel cross section showing an infringement .............................................30 Figure 13 Proposed treatment overview for Tunnel 1 (prepared by GHD) ...............................32 Figure 14 Proposed treatment overview for Tunnel 2 (prepared by GHD) ...............................33 Figure 15 Proposed treatment overview for Tunnel 3 and Tunnel 4 (prepared by GHD) .........34 Figure 16 Proposed treatment overview for Tunnel 4 and Tunnel 5 (prepared by GHD) .........35 Figure 17 Proposed treatment overview for Tunnel 5 and Tunnel 6 (prepared by GHD) .........36 Figure 18 Proposed treatment overview for Tunnel 6 and Tunnel 7 (prepared by GHD) .........37 Figure 19 Proposed treatment overview for Tunnel 8 and Tunnel 9 (prepared by GHD) .........38 Figure 20 Proposed treatment overview for Tunnel 10 Sydney end (prepared by GHD) .........39 Figure 21 Proposed treatment overview for Tunnel 10 Lithgow end (prepared by GHD) .........40 Figure 22 Diagram of a rock bolt .............................................................................................41 Figure 23 Example excavator with cutting head ......................................................................44 Figure 24 Example elevated work platform with road rail / hi-rail vehicle attachments ............45 Ten Tunnels Deviation Modifications - Review of Environmental Factors – January 2018 3 Figure 25 Proposed construction compound – Tunnel 1 .........................................................48 Figure 26 Proposed construction Compound – Tunnels 2 / 3 ..................................................49 Figure 27 Proposed construction compound – Tunnels 9 / 10 ................................................50 Figure 28 Representative receiver locations in relation to the tunnel portals ...........................74
Recommended publications
  • Volume – 25 Number – 3 September to November 2018 Edition
    Volume – 25 Number – 3 September to November 2018 Edition Steam locomotive 3801 (4-6-2) was operated by the New South Wales Government Railways between 1943 and 1976. It is arguably Australia’s most famous steam locomotive, being the only one to have visited all main line states and territories. The 38 Class numbered 30. The first 5 units, with the streamlined design, were built by Clyde Engineering, Granville, New South Wales. The other 25 units were built, semi-streamlined, at the New South Wales Eveleigh (even numbers) and Cardiff (odd numbers) Locomotive Workshops. 3801 entered service on 22 January 1943 and worked the “Newcastle Flyer” for the first time on 23 February 1943 to express passengers to and from Sydney. 2018 celebrates the 75th anniversary of this iconic steam locomotive. See page 9 for a history and restoration update. Image – Wikipedia – 3801 leads the Newcastle Flyer on 1 October 2005 1 OFFICE BEARERS President: Daniel Cronin Secretary: David Patrick Treasurer: Geoff Crow Membership Officer: David Patrick Electrical Engineer: Ben Smith Way & Works Engineer: Ben Smith Mechanical Engineer: Warwick Brisbane Development Engineer: Peter Riggall Club Rooms: Old Parcels Office Auburn Railway Station Victoria Road Auburn Telephone: 0419 414 309 Friday evenings Web Address: www.mmrs.org.au Web Master: Mark Johnson Call Board Production: John Ford Meetings: Friday evenings at 7:30 pm Committee Meetings 2nd Tuesday of the month (Refer to our website for our calendar of events) Index Page: 3 AGM Meeting Notice Page: 4 President’s Report Page: 6 What’s Happening Page: 7 Naradhan Images: Caulfield August 2018 Page: 9 Feature Article: History of Steam Locomotive 3801 Page: 14 Calendars for September 2018 to November 2018 2 THE 53rd ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE MELBOURNE MODEL RAILWAY SOCIETY INC WILL BE HELD AT 8.00 PM ON FRIDAY OCTOBER 19th, 2018 AT THE MMRS CLUB ROOMS VICTORIA STREET, HAWTHORN (at the Auburn railway station) Business: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilevel Rail Car - Wikipedia
    Bilevel rail car - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilevel_rail_car Bilevel rail car The bilevel car (American English) or double-decker train (British English and Canadian English) is a type of rail car that has two levels of passenger accommodation, as opposed to one, increasing passenger capacity (in example cases of up to 57% per car).[1] In some countries such vehicles are commonly referred to as dostos, derived from the German Doppelstockwagen. The use of double-decker carriages, where feasible, can resolve capacity problems on a railway, avoiding other options which have an associated infrastructure cost such as longer trains (which require longer station Double-deck rail car operated by Agence métropolitaine de transport platforms), more trains per hour (which the signalling or safety in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The requirements may not allow) or adding extra tracks besides the existing Lucien-L'Allier station is in the back line. ground. Bilevel trains are claimed to be more energy efficient,[2] and may have a lower operating cost per passenger.[3] A bilevel car may carry about twice as many as a normal car, without requiring double the weight to pull or material to build. However, a bilevel train may take longer to exchange passengers at each station, since more people will enter and exit from each car. The increased dwell time makes them most popular on long-distance routes which make fewer stops (and may be popular with passengers for offering a better view).[1] Bilevel cars may not be usable in countries or older railway systems with Bombardier double-deck rail cars in low loading gauges.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Train Drivers from D to DR Light Rail 2019 North Tassie
    April 2019 TM Remember when: The irst train drivers From D to DR Light Rail 2019 North Tassie trampings South East Queensland standard gauge The Great South Paciic Express goes west New loops, signalling & platform in the Central West Published monthly by the Australian Railway Historical Society (NSW Division) Editor Bruce Belbin April 2019 • $10.00 TM Assistant Editor Shane O’Neil April 2019 National Affairs Lawrance Ryan Volume 57, Number 4 Editorial Assistant Darren Tulk International Ken Date Remember when: General Manager Paul Scells The irst train drivers Subscriptions: Ph: 02 9699 4595 Fax: 02 9699 1714 Editorial Office: Ph: 02 8394 9016 Fax: 02 9699 1714 ARHS Bookshop: Ph: 02 9699 4595 Fax: 02 9699 1714 Mail: 67 Renwick Street, Redfern NSW 2016 Publisher: Australian Railway Historical Society NSW Division, ACN 000 538 803 From D to DR Light Rail 2019 Print Post 100009942 North Tassie trampings South East Queensland standard gauge Publication No. The Great South Paciic Express goes west New loops, signalling & platform in the Central West Newsagent Ovato Retail Distribution Pty Ltd Published monthly by the Australian Railway Historical Society (NSW Division) Distribution Mailing & Distribution Ligare Pty Limited and Australia Post Printing Ligare Pty Limited Features Website www.railwaydigest.com.au Central West NSW: New loops, signalling and platform 30 Facebook www.facebook.com/railwaydigest In recent years a resurgence in intrastate freight business, especially Contributor Guidelines port-related container services and additional passenger services, has Articles and illustrations remain the copyright of the author and publisher. led to an increase in rail activity on the NSW Western Line.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Railway Heritage in Nsw
    FUTURE OF RAILWAY HERITAGE IN NSW Reece McDougall Director NSW Heritage Office Future of Rail Heritage in NSW 1 m1 Railway Heritage Estate CHARACTERISTICS • Covers a broad range of buildings, works, sites and movable heritage items • Has high community interest and support • Bulk of items are under the ownership and control of Government Future of Rail Heritage in NSW 2 NSW Heritage Office - Working together to preserve our heritage 1 Slide 2 m1 mcdougr, 6/09/2005 Statutory Listings – Railway items HO Database (HOD) • (LEP’s, S.170 + SHR) total 1702 Railway items • S.170 Railway listings 854 (Government owned) SHR • 272 items • 236 in Government ownership Future of Rail Heritage in NSW 3 Listing Consequences STATE HERITAGE REGISTER • Heritage Council Approval • Minimum Maintenance Standards SECTION 170 HERITAGE REGISTER • Ministerial Principles and Heritage Council Guidelines •HAMS • Register Finalised LEP HERITAGE SCHEDULE • Notification to local council Future of Rail Heritage in NSW 4 NSW Heritage Office - Working together to preserve our heritage 2 STATE HERITAGE REGISTER – Railway items • SHR was established 1996 • Announced through “NSW Government Heritage Policy” Minister Knowles • Included previous PCOs 1937 Rail Paybus. SHR 2003. RTM Thirlmere Future of Rail Heritage in NSW 5 Celebration ! eg Commissioners Carriages, SHR 2003 Albury Station. SHR 1999 Future of Rail Heritage in NSW 6 NSW Heritage Office - Working together to preserve our heritage 3 Celebration ! eg Commissioners Carriages, SHR 2003 Future of Rail Heritage in NSW
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release New Corporate Image
    PRESS RELEASE NEW CORPORATE IMAGE The famous Zig Zag Railway, in the Blue Mountains east of Lithgow, has just launched a new brand. The Railway enlisted the help of Digital Wisdom, a local media and design company in Lithgow to come up with a new brand. Digital Wisdom were also commissioned to design the new Zig Zag Railway website which has also been launched. The railway’s Chairman Rodney Redwin explained that previously we didn’t have one logo and one brand. As a result, much of our marketing was confused and people couldn’t quickly identify who we were from our many logos. “The railway has long been a supporter of local business and we are delighted with the job they have done. Digital Wisdom were able to identify some of the iconic features that make the Zig Zag Railway the experience that it is. We are happy that they managed to capture all of them in our new logo.” The new logo features a stylised steam train crossing the famous Zig Zag viaduct with the green hill representing the rolling green forested hills surrounding the railway. The railway’s General Manager Michael Forbes, added “Following a review of the railway’s corporate image, we have introduced a new logo and house style. We are very proud of it and hope that the website provides a great opportunity to show it off”. Michael then explained that the railway now has to start rebranding all its phamplets, buildings and carriages with the new brand. “It’s a big job, but we are looking forward to the challenge.” About the Zig Zag Railway: The Zig Zag Railway is a not-for profit Co-operative which operates steam trains for eight kilometres through rugged Blue Mountains scenery over the world-famous Zig Zag, opened in 1869.
    [Show full text]
  • Jones, Peter ORCID: 0000000295669393 and Comfort, Daphne (2019) Elm Trees Under Attack Again. Town And
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Gloucestershire Research Repository This is a peer-reviewed, final published version of the following document and is licensed under All Rights Reserved license: Jones, Peter ORCID: 0000-0002-9566-9393 and Comfort, Daphne (2019) Elm trees under attack again. Town and Country Planning. pp. 71-74. ISSN 0040-9960 Official URL: https://www.tcpa.org.uk/ EPrint URI: http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/6552 Disclaimer The University of Gloucestershire has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material. The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation or warranties of commercial utility, title, or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied in respect of any material deposited. The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation that the use of the materials will not infringe any patent, copyright, trademark or other property or proprietary rights. The University of Gloucestershire accepts no liability for any infringement of intellectual property rights in any material deposited but will remove such material from public view pending investigation in the event of an allegation of any such infringement. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR TEXT. elm trees under attack again Peter Jones and Daphne Comfort outline the potential environmental impact of a new threat to elms in Britain, and look at current control treatments English elms in Cuckmere Valley in East Sussex The ConservationThe Foundation From the late 1960s onwards, Dutch elm disease there is no evidence from Europe to date of even spread rapidly within southern Britain,1 devastating severely defoliated elms dying.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Survey Report
    BRIGHTON SUBDIVISION HISTORIC PROPERTIES SURVEY PHASE I CLG Grant CO-17-013 Cultural Resource Survey Report Prepared by Autobee & Autobee, LLC 6900 W. 26th Avenue Lakewood, CO 80214 June 18, 2018 Acknowledgements The activity that is the subject of this material has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Historic Preservation Act, administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior for History Colorado. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior or History Colorado, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or History Colorado. This program received Federal funds from the National Park Service. Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental Federally-assisted programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240. Brighton Subdivision Historic Properties Survey-Phase I 2 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eveleigh Carriagevorks
    EVELEIGH CARRIAGEWORKS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VOLUME I OTTO CSERHALMI + PARTNERS PL 2002 Table of Contents i 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 SECTION 2.0 INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 2.1 Aims of the Report ------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 2.2 Site and Ownership ------------------------------------------------------------------ 8 2.3 Scope of the Report ----------------------------------------------------------------- 10 2.4 Methodology and Structure -------------------------------------------------------- 10 2.5 Terminology and Abbreviations --------------------------------------------------- 11 2.6 Contributors and Acknowledgements -------------------------------------------- 17 2.7 Constraints and Limitations -------------------------------------------------------- 18 2.8 Further Research --------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 2.9 Other Reports ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 19 SECTION 3.0 HISTORICAL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------------ 21 3.1 History and Development of the Site --------------------------------------------- 23 3.1.1 Geology & Geography ------------------------------------------------------ 23 3.1.2 Aboriginal History ----------------------------------------------------------- 24 3.1.3 Early Development ----------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Section 10 Locomotive and Rolling Stock Data
    General Instruction Pages Train Operating Conditions Manual SECTION 10 LOCOMOTIVE AND ROLLING STOCK DATA Version: 3.0 Issued: January 2016 CRN TOC Section 10 V3.0 Locomotive & Rolling Stock Data.docx © JHR UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED SECTION 10 Version: 3.0 General Instruction Pages Locomotive and Rolling Stock Data Train Operating Conditions Manual Document control Revision Date of Issue Summary of change 1.0 18/10/11 For publication 1.1 25/11/11 Updated 25/11/11 1.2 10/1/12 Updated for current rolling stock 1.3 13/5/12 Updated for current rolling stock 1.4 14/8/12 Updated for current rolling stock 1.5 16/8/12 Corrections to El Zorro vehicles 1.6 25/8/12 T333 added to the Seymour Rail Heritage Centre Note covering NGXH / GGXH wagons operating on Class 2 1.7 13/9/12 track at 23 tonne axle load, deleted. 1.8 1/8/13 General update with currently approved vehicles 2.1 1/12/14 General update with currently approved vehicles 2.2 19/12/14 Amended as shown below 2.3 12/1/15 Amended as shown below 2.4 11/10/15 Amended as shown below 3.0 16/1/16 Amended as shown below Summary of significant changes from previous version Page Summary of change All pages General update to include approved vehicles for publishing and covered on TOC waivers: Speed of vehicles covered by Note R1 between Stockinbingal and Griffith, reduced from 4 70 km/h to 65 km/h for consistency with Note R20 (originally Note R18) 4 Note R1 Joppa Junction and Queanbeyan amended to Joppa Junction and Canberra Note R20 amended to absorb Notes R3 and R18 and wagons covered by R3 and R18
    [Show full text]
  • Section 10 Locomotive and Rolling Stock Data
    General Instruction Pages Locomotive and Rolling Stock Data SECTION 10 LOCOMOTIVE AND ROLLING STOCK DATA General Instruction Pages Locomotive and Rolling Stock Data SECTION 10 Contents 3801 Limited Eveleigh - Locomotives................................................................................................................3 3801 Limited Eveleigh - Passenger Rolling Stock...............................................................................................3 3801 Limited Eveleigh - Freight Rolling Stock ...................................................................................................3 Australian Traction Corporation - Locomotives ................................................................................................3 Australian Traction Corporation - Freight Rolling Stock....................................................................................3 Australian Railway Historical Society A.C.T. Division – Locomotives................................................................3 Australian Railway Historical Society A.C.T. Division – Rail Motors ..................................................................4 Australian Railway Historical Society A.C.T. Division – Passenger Rolling Stock...............................................4 Australian Railway Historical Society A.C.T. Division – Freight Rolling Stock....................................................4 Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd - Special Purpose Rolling Stock..............................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Railways As World Heritage Sites
    Occasional Papers for the World Heritage Convention RAILWAYS AS WORLD HERITAGE SITES Anthony Coulls with contributions by Colin Divall and Robert Lee International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) 1999 Notes • Anthony Coulls was employed at the Institute of Railway Studies, National Railway Museum, York YO26 4XJ, UK, to prepare this study. • ICOMOS is deeply grateful to the Government of Austria for the generous grant that made this study possible. Published by: ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites) 49-51 Rue de la Fédération F-75015 Paris France Telephone + 33 1 45 67 67 70 Fax + 33 1 45 66 06 22 e-mail [email protected] © ICOMOS 1999 Contents Railways – an historical introduction 1 Railways as World Heritage sites – some theoretical and practical considerations 5 The proposed criteria for internationally significant railways 8 The criteria in practice – some railways of note 12 Case 1: The Moscow Underground 12 Case 2: The Semmering Pass, Austria 13 Case 3: The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, United States of America 14 Case 4: The Great Zig Zag, Australia 15 Case 5: The Darjeeling Himalayan Railway, India 17 Case 6: The Liverpool & Manchester Railway, United Kingdom 19 Case 7: The Great Western Railway, United Kingdom 22 Case 8: The Shinkansen, Japan 23 Conclusion 24 Acknowledgements 25 Select bibliography 26 Appendix – Members of the Advisory Committee and Correspondents 29 Railways – an historical introduction he possibility of designating industrial places as World Heritage Sites has always been Timplicit in the World Heritage Convention but it is only recently that systematic attention has been given to the task of identifying worthy locations.
    [Show full text]
  • GIPAA D 2014 463007Final Data Sydney Rail Network Crime Incidents
    IAU 128028 - Released 30/1/2015 Total number of incidents of crime in Sydney Rail Network by by Incident Category, Incident Further Classification and Premise sub-type - 2013-2014 Event Reported Premises Sub-Type Financial Year Property Name Suburb COMPASS Category Incident Further Classification Incident Railway Station 2013-2014 Albion Park Rail Assault (Non-DV) on Public Transport Actual Bodily Harm 1 Railway 2013-2014 Albion Park Rail Drug Detection - Possess Possess Drug/Plant 1 Railway Station 2013-2014 Albion Park Rail Albion Park Rail Assault (Non-DV) on Public Transport Actual Bodily Harm 1 Railway Station 2013-2014 Albion Park Railway Station Albion Park Rail Malicious Damage on Public Transport Malicious Damage To Property 1 Railway 2013-2014 Albion Park Railway Station Albion Park Rail Stolen Vehicles Vehicle 1 Railway Station 2013-2014 Albion Park Railway Station Albion Park Rail Street Offences Offensive Language 1 Railway Station 2013-2014 Albion Park Rail Malicious Damage on Public Transport Malicious Damage To Property 1 Railway Station 2013-2014 Albion Park Rail Street Offences Other Street Offence 1 Railway Station 2013-2014 Green Square Railway Station Alexandria Steal From Person on Public Transport Steal From Person 1 Railway Station 2013-2014 Allawah Railway Station Allawah Malicious Damage on Public Transport Graffiti 1 Railway Station 2013-2014 Allawah Assault (Non-DV) on Public Transport Assault Common 1 Railway Station 2013-2014 Allawah Malicious Damage on Public Transport Graffiti 1 Railway Station 2013-2014
    [Show full text]