DOCSLIB.ORG

Forest for All Forever

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FSC National Risk Assessment For Japan DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V 3-0 Version V 1-0 Code FSC-NRA-JP V1-0 (XX – standing for country code) National approval National decision body: FSC Japan Board Date: June 20, 2017 International approval FSC International Center: Policy and Standards Unit Date: XX MONTH 201X International contact Name: Chisato Mishiba Email address: [email protected] Period of validity Date of approval: XX MONTH 201X Valid until: (date of approval + 5 years) Body responsible for NRA FSC Japan maintenance FSC-NRA-JP V1-0 DRAFT NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR JAPAN 2017 – 1 of 145 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Japan .......................................................... 4 Background information .............................................................................................................. 6 List of experts involved in the risk assessment and their contact details ................................... 10 National Risk Assessment maintenance ................................................................................... 13 Complaints and disputes regarding the approved National Risk Assessment ........................... 13 List of key stakeholders for consultation ................................................................................... 14 Risk assessments ..................................................................................................................... 15 Controlled wood category 1: Illegally harvested wood エラー! ブックマークが定義されていませ ん。 Overview ...................................................... エラー! ブックマークが定義されていません。 Sources of legal timber in Japan .................. エラー! ブックマークが定義されていません。 Risk assessment .......................................... エラー! ブックマークが定義されていません。 Control measures ............................................................................................................. 42 Controlled wood category 2: Wood harvested in violation of traditional and human rights ........ 15 Risk assessment ........................................ エラー! ブックマークが定義されていません。 Control measures ........................................ エラー! ブックマークが定義されていません。 Detailed analysis ............................................................................................................... 44 Controlled wood category 3: Wood from forests in which high conservation values are threatened by management activities ....................................................................................... 43 Overview ......................................................................................................................... 106 Experts consulted ........................................................................................................... 110 Risk assessment ............................................................................................................. 111 HCV Occurrence Data Assessment: ............................................................................... 111 Threats & Safeguards Data Assessment ..... エラー! ブックマークが定義されていません。 Recommended control measures ................................................................................... 127 Information sources ........................................................................................................ 128 Controlled wood category 4: Wood from forests being converted to plantations or non-forest use ............................................................................................................................................... 132 Risk assessment ............................................................................................................. 132 Control measures ........................................................................................................... 135 Controlled wood category 5: Wood from forests in which genetically modified trees are planted ............................................................................................................................................... 136 Risk assessment ............................................................................................................. 136 Control measures ........................................................................................................... 138 Annex C1 List of information sources ..................................................................................... 139 Annex C2 Identification of applicable legislation ................................................................. 140 FSC-NRA-JP V1-0 DRAFT NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR JAPAN 2017 – 2 of 145 – FSC-NRA-JP V1-0 DRAFT NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR JAPAN 2017 – 3 of 145 – Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Japan Indicator Risk designation (including functional scale when relevant) Controlled wood category 1: Illegally harvested wood 1.1 Low risk 1.2 N/A 1.3 Low risk 1.4 Low risk 1.5 Low risk 1.6 Low risk 1.7 Low risk 1.8 Low risk 1.9 Low risk 1.10 Low risk 1.11 Low risk 1.12 Low risk 1.13 Low risk 1.14 Low risk 1.15 Specified risk: Hokkaido Low risk: Other areas 1.16 Low risk 1.17 Low risk 1.18 Low risk 1.19 Low risk 1.20 Low risk 1.21 Low risk Controlled wood category 2: Wood harvested in violation of traditional and human rights 2.1 Low risk 2.2 Low risk 2.3 Specified risk: Hokkaido Low risk: Other areas Controlled wood category 3: Wood from forests where high conservation values are threatened by management activities 3.0 Low risk 3.1 Low risk 3.2 Low risk 3.3 Low risk 3.4 Low risk 3.5 Low risk 3.6 Low risk Controlled wood category 4: Wood from forests being converted to plantations or non-forest use 4.1 Specified risk FSC-NRA-JP V1-0 DRAFT NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR JAPAN 2017 – 4 of 145 – Controlled wood category 5: Wood from forests in which genetically modified trees are planted 5.1 Low risk FSC-NRA-JP V1-0 DRAFT NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR JAPAN 2017 – 5 of 145 – Background information Timeline Overview Time Main activities (Month, Year) Approval of CNRA Category 1, 2 & 5 Jan 2016 Development of draft CNRA category 4 by CNRA consultants Apr 2016 Development of draft CNRA category 3 Mar - Jun 2016 NRA 1st draft development Jul 2016 - May 2017 Approval by FSC Japan Board of Directors Jun 2017 First draft submission to FSC International Jun 2017 Review of the first draft by the PSU Jul 2017 Public consultation on 1st draft Sep - Nov 2017 (Expected) NRA final draft development Dec 2017 - Feb 2018 (Expected) Final draft approval by WG and FSC Japan Board Early Mar 2018 (Expected) Final draft submission to FSC Early Mar 2018 (Expected) Review by PSU Mid-Mar-Apr 2018 (Expected) Implementation of required amendments May 2018 (Expected) Approval of the NRA by FSC International Board June 2018 (Expected) In August 2014, the NRA for Japan developed according to the procedure FSC-PRO-60-002 V2-0 was approved. The NRA had unspecified risk for Hokkaido with regards to the rights of Ainu Peoples for Category 2, and unspecified risk for Nansei Islands south of Amami Islands. Except for these areas and categories, the risk was considered low. Prior to the development of this new NRA according to FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0, a Centralized National Risk Assessment was developed in collaboration with international consultants appointed by the FSC International and national technical experts. For Category 1 and 5, two Japanese consultants recommended by FSC Japan developed the first draft together with the international consultant from NEPCon appointed by the FSC International in 2014. For Category 2, an international consultant, Leo van der Vlist, made the initial draft in fall 2014, and FSC Japan provided feedback, which was later incorporated into the draft 1. The CNRA Categories 1, 2, 5 were then published for public consultation from March 3, 2015 to April 2, 2015. The CNRA category 1, 2, and 5 were approved without change from the original draft in January 2016. For Category 3, the CNRA was developed by Japanese consultants recommended by FSC Japan, together with a CNRA consultant, NEPCon in June 2016. For category 4, a simple review of legal framework was conducted by a CNRA consultant in 2016. The NRA working group was organized in the summer of 2016, consisting of three members in the three chambers: environmental, economic, and social, chaired by Shuhei Tomimura. Since August 2016, the NRA working group gathered several times to discuss the NRA, using the CNRAs as a starting point of the discussion. Due to health problems, the chairperson of the NRA working group was later replaced by Toru Katsura, who had been a member of the NRA working group in the economic chamber. A member FSC-NRA-JP V1-0 DRAFT NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR JAPAN 2017 – 6 of 145 – in the environmental chamber was also replaced due to his availability. The members of the working group and their qualification are provided in the table below. Based on the CNRA and discussion in the NRA working group, the new NRA draft 1 was developed. The draft was approved by the working group in May 2017 with the support from all three chambers, and then by the Board of FSC Japan in June 2017. In June 2017, the first NRA draft was completed and was submitted to the FSC International. After the review and approval from the FSC International Policy and Standards Unit, the consultation for the NRA is expected to start in September 2017. The comments received during the consultation will be discussed in the working group, and reflected in
Recommended publications
  • Nature Conservation Bureau, Ministry of the Environment

    Nature Conservation Bureau, Ministry of the Environment

    ⑮ Fuji-Hakone-Izu National Park ⑨ Bandai-Asahi National Park SOYA STRAIT ① Rishiri-Rebun-Sarobetsu National Park REBUN Is. T Designation: 1936/02/01 Designation: 1950/09/05 T SOYA B. Designation: 1974/09/20 This is the northernmost national park in Japan. Mt. Fuji, a World Cultural Heritage site inscribed in This park is composed of many mountains. Mt. RISHIRI Is. STRAI UN STRAI B Mt.Rishiri June 2013, rises high in a vast stretch of forests Dewa-Sanzan is famous for mountain worship, Mt. IRI Mt. Rishiri soars majestically above the sea. National Parks of Japan ⑧ Sanriku Fukko National Park RE H Rebun Island has many alpine plants such as and several lakes. The Hakone area features Asahi, Mt. Iide and Mt. Bandai are also located (Sanriku Reconstruction National Park) RIS 1721 Mt.Horoshiri Rebunsou (Oxytropis megalantha). Sarobetsu several volcanoes, volcanic vents and lakes. Izu within the park boundaries. The view of Urabandai Designation: 1955/05/02 ①RISHIRI-REBUN- Peninsula offers scenic mountains, seashores, and Lake Inawashiro is beautiful. This park is sur- Plain, abundant in marsh plants, and Nature Conservation Bureau, Ministry of the Environment and a chain of characteristic islands in the ocean, rounded by mountains, forests and a lot of lakes. This park extends for 250 km from Kabushima in SAROBETSU N.P.427 Tonbatsu Riv. Wakasakanai' s dunes contribute to the exciting Aomori prefecture to Oshika Peninsula in Miyagi landscape. Izu-shichito. Antelopes and black bears live in this park. Teshio Riv. prefecture. Its northern part is a coastline composed of uninterrupted dynamic cliffs, while ⑯ Chubusangaku National Park ⑩ Nikko National Park its southern part forms a delicately-rugged (Chubu Mountains National Park) Designation: 1934/12/04 coastline.
  • Petrology and Geochemistry of Boninite Series Volcanic Rocks, Chichi-Jima, Bonin Islands, Japan

    Petrology and Geochemistry of Boninite Series Volcanic Rocks, Chichi-Jima, Bonin Islands, Japan

    PETROLOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY OF BONINITE SERIES VOLCANIC ROCKS, CHICHI-JIMA, BONIN ISLANDS, JAPAN P.F. Dobson Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720 S. Maruyama Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan J.G. Blank Center for the Study of Life in the Universe, SETI Institute, 515 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View, California 94043 J.G. Liou Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 Abstract An Eocene submarine boninite series volcanic center is exposed on the island of Chichi-jima, Bonin Islands, Japan. Five rock types, boninite, bronzite andesite, dacite, quartz dacite, and rhyolite, were distinguished within the boninite volcanic sequence on the basis of petrographic and geochemical observations. Boninite lavas contain high magnesium, nickel, and chromium contents indicative of primitive melts, but have high silica contents relative to other mantle- derived magmas. All boninite series lavas contain very low incompatible element concentrations, and concentrations of high-field strength elements in primitive boninite lavas are less than half of those found in depleted mid-ocean ridge basalts. Abundances of large-ion lithophile elements are relatively high in boninite series lavas, similar to the enrichments observed in many island arc lavas. Trends for both major and trace element data suggest that the more evolved lavas of the boninite magma series were derived primarily through high-level fractional crystallization of boninite. Textural features, such as resorption and glomeroporphyrocrysts, and reverse chemical zonations suggest that magma mixing contributed to the development of the quartz dacite lavas. Introduction A well exposed sequence of Eocene boninite series volcanic rocks are found on Chichi-jima (Figure 1), the type locality for boninites (Peterson, 1891).
  • Natural Park System in Japan

    Natural Park System in Japan

    Natural Park Systems in Japan CONTENTS 1. Natural Park Systems --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.1 Purposes of Natural Parks ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 1.2 History of Natural Parks --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.3 Characteristics of Natural Parks ----------------------------------------------------------- 2 1.4 Park Plans --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1.5 Controls / Regulation of Activities --------------------------------------------------------- 3 2. Present State of Natural Parks in Japan ---------------------------------------------------- 4 2.1 Designation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 2.2 Distribution of National Parks -------------------------------------------------------------- 5 2.3 Distribution of Marine Parks ---------------------------------------------------------------- 6 2.4 Visitors and Utilization ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 3. Conservation and Management -------------------------------------------------------------- 7 3.1 Measures for Conservation ----------------------------------------------------------------- 7 3.1.1 Landscape Protection Agreement ----------------------------------------------------- 7 3.1.2 Beautification Activities------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 3.1.3 Green Worker Program
  • Ogasawara Islands Japan

    Ogasawara Islands Japan

    OGASAWARA ISLANDS JAPAN The Ogasawara Islands are located in the North-Western Pacific Ocean roughly 1,000 km south of the main Japanese Archipelago. The serial property is comprised of five components within an extension of about 400 km from north to south and includes more than 30 islands, clustered within three island groups of the Ogasawara Archipelago: Mukojima, Chichijima and Hahajima, plus an additional three individual islands: Kita-iwoto and Minami-iwoto of the Kazan group and the isolated Nishinoshima Island. These islands rest along the Izu-Ogasawara Arc Trench System. The property totals 7,939 ha comprising a terrestrial area of 6,358 ha and a marine area of 1,581 ha. Today only two of the islands within the property are inhabited, Chichijima and Hahajima. The landscape is dominated by subtropical forest types and sclerophyllous shrublands surrounded by steep cliffs. There are more than 440 species of native vascular plants with exceptionally concentrated rates of endemism as high as 70% in woody plants. The islands are the habitat for more than 100 recorded native land snail species, over 90% of which are endemic to the islands. The islands serve as an outstanding example of the ongoing evolutionary processes in oceanic island ecosystems, as evidenced by the high levels of endemism; speciation through adaptive radiation; evolution of marine species into terrestrial species; and their importance for the scientific study of such processes. COUNTRY Japan NAME Ogasawara Islands NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SERIAL SITE 2011: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under natural criterion (ix). STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE The UNESCO World Heritage Committee issued the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value at the time of inscription: Brief Synthesis The Ogasawara Islands are located in the North-Western Pacific Ocean roughly 1,000 km south of the main Japanese Archipelago.
  • List of National Parks in Japan

    List of National Parks in Japan

    S. No Name Location Category 1 Abashiri Quasi-National Park Hokkaido Quasi-National Parks 2 Aichi Kogen Quasi-National Park Chubu Quasi-National Park 3 Akan National Park Hokkaido National Parks 4 Akiyoshidai Quasi-National Park Chugoku and Shikoku Quasi-National Park 5 Amami Gunto Quasi-National Park Kyushu Quasi-National Park 6 Ashizuri-Uwakai National Park Chugoku and Shikoku National Park 7 Aso-Kuju National Park Kyushu National Park 8 Bandai-Asahi National Park Tohoku National Park 9 Biwako Quasi-National Park Kansai Quasi-National Park 10 Chichibu-Tama-Kai National Park Kanto National Park 11 Chokai Quasi-National Park Tohoku Quasi-National Parks 12 Chubu-Sangaku National Park Chubu National Park 13 Daisen-Oki National Park Chugoku and Shikoku National Park 14 Daisetsuzan National Park Hokkaido National Parks 15 Echigo Sanzan-Tadami Quasi-National Park Chubu Quasi-National Park 16 Echizen-Kaga Kaigan Quasi-National Park Chubu Quasi-National Park 17 Fuji-Hakone-Izu National Park Kanto National Park 18 Genkai Quasi-National Park Kyushu Quasi-National Park 19 Hakusan National Park Chubu National Park 20 Hayachine Quasi-National Park Tohoku Quasi-National Parks 21 Hiba-Dogo-Taishaku Quasi-National Park Chugoku and Shikoku Quasi-National Park 22 Hidaka-sanmyaku Erimo Quasi-National Park Hokkaido Quasi-National Parks 23 Hida-Kisogawa Quasi-National Park Chubu Quasi-National Park 24 Hyonosen-Ushiroyama-Nagisan Quasi-National Park Chugoku and Shikoku Quasi-National Park 25 Ibi-Sekigahara-Yoro Quasi-National Park Chubu Quasi-National Park

  • Ogasawara Islands

    ASIA / PACIFIC OGASAWARA ISLANDS JAPAN Japan – Ogasawara Islands WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION – IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION OGASAWARA ISLANDS (JAPAN) – ID No. 1362 IUCN RECOMMENDATION TO 35th SESSION: To inscribe the property under natural criteria Key paragraphs of Operational Guidelines: 77 Property meets one or more natural criteria. 78 Property meets conditions of integrity and has an adequate protection and management system. 114 Property meets management requirements for serial properties. 1. DOCUMENTATION Ogasawara Islands: Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation Bureau (MoE); Forestry Agency; Cultural a) Date nomination received by IUCN: 15 March Heritage Agency; Tokyo Metropolitan Government 2010. (TMG); and Ogasawara Village, and the Scientific Council. Numerous discussions were held with members b) Additional information officially requested from of local NGOs and two special sessions were organised and provided by the State Party: Following the to meet with community representatives on Chichijima technical evaluation mission the State Party was and Hahajima Islands. requested to provide supplementary information on 14 September 2010. The information was received on 12 e) Field Visit: Peter Shadie and Naomi Doak, July 2010. November 2010. f) Date of IUCN approval of this report: 29 April 2011. c) Additional Literature Consulted: Chaloupka, M., Bjorndal, K., Balazs, G. H., Bolten, A. B., Ehrhart, L. M., Limpus, C. J., Suganuma, H., Troeng, S. and 2. SUMMARY OF NATURAL VALUES Yamaguchi, M. (2007): Encouraging outlook for recovery of a once severely exploited marine mega- The Ogasawara Islands are located in the western herbivore. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Dingwall, P., Pacific Ocean, to the north of the Tropic of Cancer and Weighell, T. and Badman, T.

  • Seabirds As Adhesive Seed Dispersers of Alien and Native Plants in the Oceanic Ogasawara Islands, Japan

    Biodivers Conserv (2012) 21:2787–2801 DOI 10.1007/s10531-012-0336-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Seabirds as adhesive seed dispersers of alien and native plants in the oceanic Ogasawara Islands, Japan Yukiko Aoyama • Kazuto Kawakami • Satoshi Chiba Received: 23 January 2012 / Accepted: 12 July 2012 / Published online: 25 July 2012 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract Previous studies have shown that the dispersal of plant seeds to oceanic islands is largely attributable to birds. However, few studies have assessed the role of adhesive dispersal by birds even though this mechanism has long been recognized as a major vector of seed transport. Some data point to the possibility that adhesive transport by seabirds transfers alien plant seeds in island ecosystems. In the present study, we examined the seed-dispersing ability of seabirds among islands in the oceanic Ogasawara Islands, Japan. We used capture surveys to examine the frequency of seeds adhering to seabirds and tested the salt tolerances of the seeds. The distributions of the plant species were examined and the relationships between plant and seabird distributions were analyzed using generalized linear models. Seeds of nine plant species, including aliens, were detected on 16–32 % of captured seabirds. Seeds included those generally considered to be dispersed by wind or internally transported by birds in their guts. Seeds exposed to NaCl solution isotonic with seawater for up to 8 h suffered little or no loss of viability. Analyses of plant distributions demonstrated positive relationships between the distributions of some plants and seabirds. These results show that seabirds effectively disperse seeds of both native and introduced plant species.
  • ”Satoyama-Satoumi” Regional Management

    ”Satoyama-Satoumi” Regional Management

    ”Satoyama-Satoumi” regional management : a universal cognition and practice for green economy, ecosystem health Title and sustainable society in indigenous communities of the world Author(s) Dublin, Devon Ronald Citation 北海道大学. 博士(環境科学) 甲第11785号 Issue Date 2015-03-25 DOI 10.14943/doctoral.k11785 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/59329 Type theses (doctoral) File Information Devon_Dublin.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP SATOYAMA-SATOUMI REGIONAL MANAGEMENT: A UNIVERSAL COGNITION AND PRACTICE FOR GREEN ECONOMY, ECOSYSTEM HEALTH AND SUSTAINABLE SOCIETIES IN INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES OF THE WORLD （”里山里海”地域管理：世界の先住民族のグリーン経済、エコシステムヘルス、 持続的社会に資する実践と普遍的な認識） By Devon Ronald Dublin A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Environmental Science Development HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY 2015 ©2015 Devon R. Dublin This page was intentionally left blank. Abstract Satoyama concept has been advocated for an ideal model for traditional landscape, where nature and human are in harmony and sustainable. In 2010, the International Partnership for Satoyama Initiative (IPSI) was launched to revitalize the concept of Satoyama in Japan and promote it internationally but no mechanism exists in which it can be thoroughly evaluated. Because of a combination of factors, the existence of indigenous peoples can no longer be based on a hunter-gatherer tradition and requires agriculture to guarantee their food supply and livelihood. The Satoyamas of Noto were recognized as a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System (GIAHS) thus highlighting the inherent connection between Satoyama and agriculture but there exists a research gap on the social aspects of Satoyama with a bias towards the ecological sphere and no research has been done to ascertain the possibility of a Satoyama type approach for the introduction of new and improved agricultural techniques into indigenous communities.
  • Forest for All Forever

    Forest for All Forever

    FSC National Risk Assessment For Japan DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0 Version V1-0 Code FSC-NRA-JP V1-0 National approval National decision body: FSC Japan Board Date: 30 November 2017 International approval FSC International Center: Performance and Standards Unit Date: 27 June 2018 International contact Name: Chisato Mishiba Email address: [email protected] Period of validity Date of approval: 27 June 2018 Valid until: (date of approval + 5 years) Body responsible for NRA FSC Japan maintenance FSC-NRA-JP V1-0 NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR JAPAN 2018 – 1 of 175 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Japan .......................................................... 3 Background information .............................................................................................................. 4 List of experts involved in the risk assessment and their contact details ..................................... 8 National Risk Assessment maintenance ................................................................................... 11 Complaints and disputes regarding the approved National Risk Assessment ........................... 11 List of key stakeholders for consultation ................................................................................... 11 Risk assessments ..................................................................................................................... 14 Controlled wood category 1: Illegally harvested wood .............................................................

  • Reviving Nature's Legacy: a Guide to Nature Restoration "Yomigaere Shizen"

    Preface The rehabilitation and restoration of many ecosystems, including forests, farmland, rivers, wetlands and tidal flats, have been implemented under the Law for the Promotion of Nature Restoration, enacted in 2003. At present, eighteen nature restoration projects have been conducted by a Committee established under this Law. On the other hand, once a Committee has been launched, we have heard many calls for help at the working-level regarding how to formulate an Overall Plan and Implementation Plan. In an attempt to answer these questions, this guide has been compiled by consultants who have actually been involved with project implementation to present an overall framework of nature restoration projects to local governments, NGOs and consultants who are interested in planning or implementing them. Part 1 discusses the philosophy and concept of nature restoration and describes the necessity for nature restoration projects as measures to achieve the goals of the Convention on Biological Diversity adopted at the Earth Summit and the New National Biodiversity Strategy of Japan and realize a society in harmony with nature. Then, the principles for implementing projects in line with Law for the Promotion of Nature Restoration are provided along with an image of the direction that projects should be headed. The structure of the Committee, the decision-making body for nature restoration projects, and important notes regarding its establishment are also explained. Part 2 focuses on the technical aspects of implementing a nature restoration project. The entire project process beginning with drafting the Overall Plan and formulating the Implementation Plan, through design, construction and maintenance is explained from a viewpoint different from conventional construction works.
  • Kuniyasu Mokudai Malcolm Cooper · Mahito Watanabe Shamik Chakraborty Editors

    Kuniyasu Mokudai Malcolm Cooper · Mahito Watanabe Shamik Chakraborty Editors

    Geoheritage, Geoparks and Geotourism Abhik Chakraborty · Kuniyasu Mokudai Malcolm Cooper · Mahito Watanabe Shamik Chakraborty Editors Natural Heritage of Japan Geological, Geomorphological, and Ecological Aspects Geoheritage, Geoparks and Geotourism Conservation and Management Series Series editors Wolfgang Eder, Munich, Germany Peter T. Bobrowsky, Burnaby, BC, Canada Jesu´s Martı´nez-Frı´as, Madrid, Spain Spectacular geo-morphological landscapes and regions with special geological features or mining sites are becoming increasingly recognized as critical areas to protect and conserve for the unique geoscientific aspects they represent and as places to enjoy and learn about the science and history of our planet. More and more national and international stakeholders are engaged in projects related to “Geoheritage”, “Geo-conservation”, “Geoparks” and “Geotourism”; and are positively influencing the general perception of modern Earth Sciences. Most notably, “Geoparks” have proven to be excellent tools to educate the public about Earth Sciences; and they are also important areas for recreation and significant sustain- able economic development through geotourism. In order to develop further the understanding of Earth Sciences in general and to elucidate the importance of Earth Sciences for Society, the “Geoheritage, Geoparks and Geotourism Conservation and Management Series” has been launched together with its sister “GeoGuides” series. Projects developed in partnership with UNESCO, World Heritage and Global Geoparks Networks, IUGS and IGU, as well as with the ‘Earth Science Matters’ Foundation will be considered for publication. This series aims to provide a place for in-depth presentations of developmental and management issues related to Geoheritage and Geotourism in existing and potential Geoparks. Individually authored monographs as well as edited volumes and conference proceedings are welcome; and this book series is considered to be complementary to the Springer-Journal “Geoheritage”.
  • First-Day Scenic and Swordguard Cancellations on National Park Issues

    First-Day Scenic and Swordguard Cancellations on National Park Issues

    232 August 2016 JAPANESE PHILATELY, VOL. 71 : NO. 4 _______________________________________________________________________________ First-Day Scenic and Swordguard Cancellations on National Park Issues This article incorporates some updated information identified subsequent to the publication of the August 2016 issue. by Anker Nielsen Introduction These days, new stamp issues, such as Commemorative and Special issues and Greetings issues, which have a more “national” character, have special pictorial first-day cancels that are used at officially designated post offices. For the more localized Prefectural issues there is no special pictorial cancel authorized, but instead the designated first-day post office(s) uses its scenic datestamp as a first-day pictorial datestamp. This latter practice of using scenic datestamps was also employed in the now discontinued National Park issues. It is easy to find covers with first-day cancellations from the National Park issues. Many covers were never sent through the post (i.e., purposely unaddressed) and have only a scenic datestamp(s) cancelling the stamps. If sent within Japan it should also have a domestic comb cancel, and if sent to a foreign country it should also have a roman-letter cancellation. For those National Park stamps issued from April 1952 this roman-letter cancellation will be a swordguard. The most interesting first-day covers to collect are those sent overseas from a designated post office within the park. A number of these are rather small and many started using a scenic datestamp only from the first day that its relevant national park stamp(s) was issued. Sometimes the post office got its swordguard canceller especially for that day.