DOCSLIB.ORG

Receipts Collected for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2017 (Application No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PFC Quarterly Report - Receipts Collected For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2017 (Application No. 2) Application #05-02-C-00-ANC $14,000,000.00 Application #05-02-C-01-ANC 71,000,000.00 Total Collection Authority $85,000,000.00 PFC Revenue Received Air Carriers Current Quarter Previous Quarters Cumulative Aer Lingus - $ 176.36 $ 176.36 Aeroflot - Russian Airline 106.93 875.12 982.05 Aerolane Lineas Aereas Nacionale - 112.71 112.71 AeroMexico 43.35 5,280.03 5,323.38 Aerovias De Mexico - 355.47 355.47 Air Canada 6,720.93 473,100.82 479,821.75 Air France 134.84 13,685.29 13,820.13 Air New Zealand 98.04 5,912.09 6,010.13 Air Pacific Limited DBA Fiji Airways - 1,442.11 1,442.11 Air Serbia, Inc. - 20.23 20.23 Air Tahiti - 31.79 31.79 Alaska Airlines Inc 937,678.57 33,136,748.82 34,074,427.39 Alitalia Airlines 5.78 338.13 343.91 Alitalia Societa Aerea Italiana S.P.A. - 8.67 8.67 Allegian Air, Inc. - 127.16 All Nippon Airways Co Ltd 121.38 3,005.85 3,127.23 Aloha Airlines - 86.37 86.37 America West Airlines - 180,410.15 180,410.15 American Airlines 26,083.37 1,617,806.07 1,643,889.44 American Trans Air - 459.07 459.07 Asiana Airlines 1,409.55 37,415.12 38,824.67 Austrian Airlines AG - 1,892.16 1,892.16 Aviacion Commercial Del America - 5.78 5.78 Avianca Inc 248.54 1,818.60 2,067.14 Big Sky Airlines - 20.23 20.23 British Airways 312.19 19,177.74 19,489.93 Brussels - 153.17 153.17 Cape Air - 40.46 40.46 Cape Smythe Air Service, Inc - 8.67 8.67 Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd 254.52 10,505.29 10,759.81 Champion Air - 367.03 367.03 China Airlines 901.68 155,641.95 156,543.63 Copa Airlines Inc 83.81 895.90 979.71 Condor Flugdienst GMBH 3,579.09 374,735.65 378,314.74 Continental Airlines - 1,645,749.29 1,645,749.29 Corvus Airlines Inc 2,627.01 65,656.09 68,283.10 Czech Airlines - 164.73 164.73 Delta Air Lines Inc 179,996.26 5,768,390.15 5,948,386.41 Elal Israel Airlines Ltd 17.34 265.88 283.22 Emirates 463.53 16,107.65 16,571.18 Etihad Airways - 2.89 2.89 Eva Airways Corporation 3,259.92 30,382.57 33,642.49 Fiji Airways Limited 89.59 471.07 560.66 Finnair 31.79 135.83 167.62 Frontier Airlines, Inc. - 422,970.53 422,970.53 Frontier Flying Service - 3,184.84 3,184.84 Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. - 283.22 283.22 Great Western Financial - 8.67 8.67 Hawaiia Island Air - 175.41 175.41 Hawaiian Airlines 399.51 142,632.37 143,031.88 Iberia Airlines of Spain - 231.20 231.20 Icelandair 5,579.69 105,403.90 110,983.59 Island Air Service - 149.59 149.59 Japan Airlines Co, Ltd 516.98 68,453.19 68,970.17 Jet Airways - 27.62 27.62 Jet Aviation - 8.67 8.67 JetBlue Airways Corporation 5,980.19 568,787.69 574,767.88 KLM Royal Dutch Airlines 94.49 6,919.99 7,014.48 Korean Air Lines Co Ltd 1,296.24 100,123.46 101,419.70 Kuwait Airlines - 14.45 14.45 Lan Argentina S.A. - 95.26 95.26 Lan Chile Airlines - 215.30 215.30 Lan Peru Airlines SA - 811.89 811.89 Latam Airlines Group SA 83.48 2,247.42 2,330.90 Lineas Aereas Costarricenses S.A. - 98.26 98.26 LOT Polish Airlines - 126.50 126.50 Lufthansa German Ailrines 242.65 28,453.98 28,696.63 Malaysia Airlines - 179.18 179.18 Mesa Airlines - 698.06 698.06 Mexicana Airlines - 968.04 968.04 Miami Air International - 5,771.33 5,771.33 Midwest Airlines - 4,751.13 4,751.13 MN Airlines, LLC dba Sun Country Airline 491.30 404,808.62 405,299.92 Monarch Airlines - 265.88 265.88 North American Airline - 780.30 780.30 Northwest Airlines, Inc. - 1,579,472.19 1,579,472.19 Omni Air International - 2,274.43 2,274.43 Peninsula Airways Inc 468.18 16,198.06 16,666.24 Polish Airlines - 57.80 57.80 Qantas Airways Ltd 68.59 6,922.86 6,991.45 Qatar Airways Corp 23.12 347.35 370.47 Republic Airways - 1,412.58 1,412.58 Saudi Arabian Airlines Corp. - 8.78 8.78 Scandinavian Airlines - 4,116.49 4,116.49 Seaport Airlines - 5.78 5.78 Silver Airways Corp 8.67 50.63 59.30 Singapore Airlines Cargo PTE Ltd 72.25 4,106.69 4,178.94 South African Airways - 378.59 378.59 Swiss International Air Lines 75.14 3,929.95 4,005.09 Swissport USA Inc. - 5.78 5.78 Taca International Airlines - 196.52 196.52 TAM Linhas Aereas SA 11.56 130.05 141.61 Tap Air Portugal - 60.69 60.69 Thompson Airways 248.54 849.66 1,098.20 Transportes Aereos Meridionais Tam Airlines 2.89 840.77 843.66 Turkish Airlines, Inc. 97.71 414.95 512.66 United Airlines, Inc 64,093.85 3,452,649.93 3,516,743.78 US Airways - 1,130,301.32 1,130,301.32 Uzbekistan Airways - 1,275.00 1,275.00 Varig Airlines - 11.56 11.56 Virgin America Inc. 26.01 26,251.28 26,277.29 Virgin Atlantic 199.08 785.20 984.28 Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd 28.90 381.48 410.38 Virgin Blue Air - 3,916.39 3,916.39 Vladivostok Air America, Inc - 1,537.48 1,537.48 WestJet Airlines Ltd 1,778.15 29,541.28 31,319.43 Yakutia 1,502.80 7,216.33 8,719.13 Total PFC Receipts Received From Air Carriers $ 1,247,657.98 $ 51,715,280.01 $ 52,962,937.99 Interest Earned 3,402.09 1,011,607.83 1,015,009.92 Adjustment 74,028.00 74,028.00 Excess Revenue from APP 99-01-C-00-ANC 1,182,614.63 1,182,614.63 Total PFC Revenue $ 1,251,060.07 $ 53,983,530.47 $ 55,234,590.54 PFC Quarterly Report - Project Expenditure Activity Public Agency: State of Alaska, DOT & PF Use Airport: Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (ANC) Quarter Ending: December 31, 2017 Projects Approved for Date for Charge Est Project Est Project Expenditures Expenditures Current Est. Authority to Impose and Use Use & Expiration Approved Implement Complete For Current For Previous Cumulative Amount of Costs To Be PFC Revenues Impose Date Level Date Date Quarter Quarters Expenditures Use Approval PFC Funded 1 . Terminal Redevelopment (PFC payments to debt service) 10/1/00 1/1/06 $ 3.00 8/1/98 10/26/11 $ - $ 21,043,173.00 $ 21,043,173.00 $ 21,043,173.00 $ 21,043,173.00 Total on Application 99-01-C-00-ANC $ - $ 21,043,173.00 $ 21,043,173.00 $ 21,043,173.00 $ 21,043,173.00 1 . Concourse A & B Retrofit (Pay as you go projects) 10/12/05 7/1/09 $ 3.00 6/1/05 6/30/09 $ - $ 13,509,088.51 $ 13,509,088.51 $ 14,000,000.00 $ 14,000,000.00 2 . Concourse A & B Retrofit (PFC payments to debt service) 7/1/09 12/1/26 $ 3.00 6/1/05 6/30/09 36,600,000.00 36,600,000.00 71,000,000.00 71,000,000.00 Total on Application 05-02-C-01-ANC $ - $ 50,109,088.51 $ 50,109,088.51 $ 85,000,000.00 $ 85,000,000.00 Total All Applications $ - $ 71,152,261.51 $ 71,152,261.51 $ 106,043,173.00 $ 106,043,173.00 PFC Quarterly Report - Revenue Receipts & Project Expenditure Summary Public Agency: State of Alaska, DOT & PF Use Airport: Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (ANC) Quarter ending: December 31, 2017 A. PFC COLLECTIONS & INTERESTS Prior Quarter Current Current Cumulative Authorizing Reported Quarter Quarter Collections Document (Cumulative) Revenue Earned Interest Earned to Date 99-01-C-00-ANC $ 21,043,173.00 $ - $ - $ 21,043,173.00 05-02-C-01-ANC 53,983,530.47 1,247,657.98 3,402.09 55,234,590.54 TOTAL $ 75,026,703.47 $ 1,247,657.98 $ 3,402.09 $ 76,277,763.54 B. AUTHORITY AND PROJECT EXPENDITURES SUMMARY Charge Authority Previous Cumulative Current Quarter Quarter-end Cumulative Unliquidated Authorizing Date for Expiration Approved Collections Expenditures Collections Expenditures Collections PFC Revenue Document Use & Impose Date Level Impose Use & Interest & Interest & Interest Expenditures Balance 99-01-C-00-ANC 10/1/2000 1/1/2006 $ 3.00 $ 22,000,000.00 $ 22,000,000.00 $ 21,043,173.00 $ 21,043,173.00 $ - $ - $ 21,043,173.00 $ 21,043,173.00 $ - 05-02-C-00-ANC 10/12/2005 7/1/2009 $ 3.00 14,000,000.00 14,000,000.00 13,509,088.51 13,509,088.51 - - 13,509,088.51 13,509,088.51 - 05-02-C-01-ANC 7/1/2009 12/1/2026 $ 3.00 71,000,000.00 71,000,000.00 40,474,441.96 36,600,000.00 1,251,060.07 - 41,725,502.03 36,600,000.00 5,125,502.03 TOTAL $ 107,000,000.00 $ 107,000,000.00 $ 75,026,703.47 $ 71,152,261.51 $ 1,251,060.07 $ - $ 76,277,763.54 $ 71,152,261.51 $ 5,125,502.03.
Recommended publications
  • Performance Monitoring Report 2018/19 Date of Issue: 31 July 2019

    Performance Monitoring Report 2018/19 Date of Issue: 31 July 2019

    Performance monitoring report 2018/19 Date of issue: 31 July 2019 Gatwick Airport Limited 1. Introduction This report provides an update on performance at Gatwick in the financial year 2018/19, ending 31 March 2019. Gatwick Airport is continuing to perform very well for passengers and airlines and has delivered consistently good service performance in nearly all areas, achieving 100% of its monthly Core Service Standards for the second year in a row. All of the data in this report have been made available to airline users during 2018/19. In publishing this report, Gatwick Airport welcomes feedback from airlines users, passenger representatives and the CAA. 1 2. Traffic Gatwick Airport served 46.4 million passengers in the financial year 2018/19. This was an increase of 1.6% over the previous year. Driving this growth was an increase in long haul routes, increasing by 1.1 million passengers or 14.3%, while short haul and domestic traffic passenger numbers were 0.4 million below prior year, mainly as a result of the loss of Monarch Airlines in October 2017, and the slow utilisation of Monarch’s previous slot allocation. Table 1: Traffic data 2017/18 2018/19 % change Passenger traffic (m) 45.7 46.4 1.6% Air Transport Movements - 280.8 281.7 0.3% flights (k) Seats per ATM 187.4 191.0 1.9% Load factor (%) 86.3% 86.8% 0.5ppt Passengers per ATM 162.7 164.8 1.3% Additional information on our traffic trends is available in our monthly traffic updates1. 1 http://www.gatwickairport.com/business-community/about-gatwick/our-performance/monthly-traffic-figures/ 2 3.
  • Paper 3: Investigating Business in a Competitive Environment

    Paper 3: Investigating Business in a Competitive Environment

    Please check the examination details below before entering your candidate information Candidate surname Other names Pearson Edexcel Centre Number Candidate Number Level 3 GCE Friday 7 June 2019 Morning (Time: 2 hours) Paper Reference 9BS0/03 Business Advanced Paper 3: Investigating business in a competitive environment You must have: Total Marks Insert (enclosed) Instructions • Use black ink or ball-point pen. • Fill in the boxes at the top of this page with your name, centre number and candidate number. • Answer all questions. • Answer the questions in the spaces provided – there may be more space than you need. Information • The total mark for this paper is 100. • The marks for each question are shown in brackets – use this as a guide as to how much time to spend on each question. • You may use a calculator. Advice • Read each question carefully before you start to answer it. • Try to answer every question. • Check your answers if you have time at the end. Turn over P56802A ©2019 Pearson Education Ltd. *P56802A0128* 1/1/1/1/1/1 Answer ALL questions. SECTION A Read the following extracts (A to D) before answering Question 1. Write your answers in the spaces provided. Extract A UK holiday trends for 2017 Research by the Association of British Travel Agents (ABTA) shows an increase in bookings for all-inclusive holidays. For consumers seeking value for money, ease of travel and a stress-free break, all-inclusive holidays provide the best solution. With the UK £ sterling exchange rate and its economy both remaining uncertain, all-inclusive holidays, to destinations such as Mexico and South Africa, are easier to budget for.
  • Monarch Airlines Collapsed and Entered Administration

    Monarch Airlines Collapsed and Entered Administration

    Find our latest analyses and trade ideas on bsic.it The Final Mayday Call: Monarch Airlines Collapsed and Entered Administration About Monarch Airlines Monarch Airlines was a British low-cost airline that mainly operated in the Mediterranean. It was the UK’s fifth largest airline and the largest ever to collapse. In 1967 two British businessmen, backed by the financing provided by the Italian-Swiss Mantegazza family, founded Monarch to promote air travels to ordinary families rather than being directed solely towards wealthier clients. Its activity reached the highest level in the early 2000s when the company managed to be the UK’s second greatest airline by number of passengers in many airports, the most important of which was Manchester. However, its potential did not materialize afterwards. In fact, in 2004, following the success of the low-costs carriers such as EasyJet, Monarch tried to adopt a low-cost model too, but that switch turned out to be destructive to the existent value. From a financial perspective, in 2009, after many years of profitably, Monarch reported a pre-tax loss of £32.3m. This event led to a cash injection of £45m from the Mantegazza family. The reason for this unexpected result was a change in the company focus. From being mainly a charter airline, its business model was turned into that of a scheduled flights airline, with a target of 80% of its business being scheduled, 4x higher compared to the 20% target determined in 2005. Other events aggravated the situation. Among those, we remember that in 2011 high jet fuel prices increased the airline’s annual fuel bill by £50m and caused a £45m pre-tax loss for the same year.
  • Monarch Airlines Claim Form

    Monarch Airlines Claim Form

    Monarch Airlines Claim Form Is Xerxes heaping or winnable after unfallen Aamir denigrates so matchlessly? Glutinous Juan paginate her cell so preciously that Ev abode very levelling. Ameliorating Judd reloads calculatingly. The dissolution of your money you wanted to monarch airlines ltd was cheaper make sure the convention, and strength that the bond is successful How does not store any new challenges as soon as an end result. Electric cars are now cheaper to insure than their petrol and diesel counterparts, accordi. Get the latest cabin crew recruitment news delivered to your inbox once a week. Sign up to promote the latest stories, news, reviews and money saving offers across energy, insurance, broadband, mobile and more. ATOL protected customers following the collapse of the airline. GRIM search of what remote Scottish loch for sale missing Huddersfield man begins next week. For airline did not guaranteed for flights are filing a claim is increased costs for a refund or get! Promotional discounts are not transferrable towards future bookings. As stuff, you drift even still post no claim to us in letter form serve the mail service straight with our postal address. Where do Scale Economies come from? As executive chef at idemniflight can claim! How do all customer service than three carriers most of cookies are now gone into your case. Not received goods or services? We are currently dealing with team many men delay claims and as expert. MAEL is unsustainable in its rigid form administrators KPMG said. Proposed pit made and underground resources. Large airlines must book passengers on people next direct flight operated by scorn or an airline industry which nuts have a low agreement.
  • 1 Monarch Airlines' Response to the CAA's Review on Gatwick

    1 Monarch Airlines' Response to the CAA's Review on Gatwick

    Monarch airlines’ response to the CAA’s review on Gatwick‘s commitment framework EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Monarch Airlines Ltd (Monarch) welcome the CAA review of the contract and commitments framework, to ensure that Gatwick Airport Ltd. (GAL), is delivering on its commitments under its economic licence in the interest of passengers. We support the scope of the review in principle, but wish to see greater analysis, to be assured that GAL are delivering within the scope of the licence. We feel that whilst the proposed review will provide for a “health check”, the scope does not go far enough to provide assurances that GAL is performing under its commitments. We would like to see a fourth area of scope included in the review, which would provide for analysis of each airlines cost base (with or without bi-lateral agreements), to understand and confirm that a fair competitive environment exists, in the interests of passengers. We strongly oppose any reduction in oversight by the CAA as is suggested in the Para 3.5 page 23 of the consultation document. We believe that this would allow the potential for GAL to apply its own interpretation of the framework, which may be detrimental to the interests of passengers. We would like to see a re-introduction of a financial penalty framework, for capital investment projects that are not delivered on schedule. We do not feel that we have yet seen any benefits under the new regulatory framework, and believe that GAL’s position is based on traffic volumes, and thus revenue, which we feel is contradictory to the overarching purpose and philosophy of serving the passengers interests.
  • Fiji Airways COVID-19 Liquidity Support Facility (Fiji)

    Fiji Airways COVID-19 Liquidity Support Facility (Fiji)

    Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors Project Number: 54311-001 December 2020 Proposed Loan and Administration of Loan Air Pacific Limited Fiji Airways COVID-19 Liquidity Support Facility (Fiji) This document contains information that is subject to exceptions to disclosure set forth in ADB's Access to Information Policy. Recipients should therefore not disclose its contents to third parties, except in connection with the performance of their official duties. Upon Board approval, ADB will make publicly available an abbreviated version of this document, which will exclude confidential business information and ADB’s assessment of project or transaction risk. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 1 December 2020) Currency unit – Fijian dollar/s (F$) F$1.00 = $0.4827 $1.00 = F$2.0716 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank COVID-19 – coronavirus disease DFC – United States International Development Finance Corporation EHS – environmental, health, and safety GDP – gross domestic product IATA – International Air Transport Association ICAO – International Civil Aviation Organization LEAP – Leading Asia’s Private Infrastructure Fund NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Fiji ends on 31 July. "FY" before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2021 ends on 31 July 2021. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. Vice-President Ashok Lavasa, Private Sector Operations and Public–Private Partnerships Director General Michael Barrow, Private Sector Operations Department (PSOD) Deputy Director General Christopher Thieme, PSOD Director Jackie B. Surtani, Infrastructure Finance Division 2 (PSIF2), PSOD Team leader Yeon Su Kim, Investment Specialist, PSIF2, PSOD Team members Genevieve Abel, Principal Transaction Support Specialist (Integrity), Private Sector Transaction Support Division (PSTS), PSOD Augustus Leo S.
  • Neil Cloughley, Managing Director, Faradair Aerospace

    Neil Cloughley, Managing Director, Faradair Aerospace

    Introduction to Faradair® Linking cities via Hybrid flight ® faradair Neil Cloughley Founder & Managing Director Faradair Aerospace Limited • In the next 15 years it is forecast that 60% of the Worlds population will ® live in cities • Land based transportation networks are already at capacity with rising prices • The next transportation revolution faradair will operate in the skies – it has to! However THREE problems MUST be solved to enable this market; • Noise • Cost of Operations • Emissions But don’t we have aircraft already? A2B Airways, AB Airlines, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen London Express, ACE Freighters, ACE Scotland, Air 2000, Air Anglia, Air Atlanta Europe, Air Belfast, Air Bridge Carriers, Air Bristol, Air Caledonian, Air Cavrel, Air Charter, Air Commerce, Air Commuter, Air Contractors, Air Condor, Air Contractors, Air Cordial, Air Couriers, Air Ecosse, Air Enterprises, Air Europe, Air Europe Express, Air Faisal, Air Ferry, Air Foyle HeavyLift, Air Freight, Air Gregory, Air International (airlines) Air Kent, Air Kilroe, Air Kruise, Air Links, Air Luton, Air Manchester, Air Safaris, Air Sarnia, Air Scandic, Air Scotland, Air Southwest, Air Sylhet, Air Transport Charter, AirUK, Air UK Leisure, Air Ulster, Air Wales, Aircraft Transport and Travel, Airflight, Airspan Travel, Airtours, Airfreight Express, Airways International, Airwork Limited, Airworld Alderney, Air Ferries, Alidair, All Cargo, All Leisure, Allied Airways, Alpha One Airways, Ambassador Airways, Amber Airways, Amberair, Anglo Cargo, Aquila Airways,
  • Commission Clears Joint Control of UK Air Traffic Control Provider NATS

    Commission Clears Joint Control of UK Air Traffic Control Provider NATS

    ,3 Brussels, 14 May 2001 &RPPLVVLRQ FOHDUV MRLQW FRQWURO RI 8. DLU WUDIILF FRQWUROSURYLGHU1$76 7KH(XURSHDQ&RPPLVVLRQKDVFOHDUHGWKHDFTXLVLWLRQRIMRLQWFRQWURORYHU WKH8.DLUWUDIILFFRQWUROSURYLGHU1$76E\DJURXSRIVHYHQDLUOLQHVDQGWKH 8. *RYHUQPHQW ,Q WKH DEVHQFH RI RYHUODSV WKH &RPPLVVLRQ H[DPLQHG FDUHIXOO\WKHH[WHQWWRZKLFKWKHLQYROYHPHQWRI%ULWLVK$LUZD\VDQGWKHRWKHU VL[ DLUOLQHV LQ WKH PDQDJHPHQW RI 1$76 FRXOG FUHDWH RU VWUHQJWKHQ DQ\ GRPLQDQWSRVLWLRQVEXWLWVLQYHVWLJDWLRQOHGWRWKHFRQFOXVLRQWKDWWKLVZRXOG QRWEHWKHUHVXOW NATS has two main activities. It provides “en route” air traffic services in UK airspace and over the Atlantic ocean and, as is usual in this sector, NATS has a statutory monopoly for that activity. NATS also provides “airport” air traffic services at UK airports. NATS is the UK’s main provider of such services. After a bidding process which began in July 1997, the UK Government announced on 27 March 2001 that a group of airlines -- The Airline Group -- had been chosen to be the Government’s strategic partner in NATS. The airlines are: Britannia Airways, British Airways, British Midland, Easyjet, Monarch Airlines, Virgin Atlantic and Airtours International Airways. They will jointly hold 46% stake in NATS. The UK Government will retain a 49% shareholding and the remaining 5% will be held by employees. The UK Government describes this arrangement as a public/private partnership (PPP) with the Airline Group being the strategic partner. One of the UK Government’s objectives for the NATS public private partnership is to “ensure the strategic partner takes responsibility for managing strategy, investment programme and new business development”. 1RKRUL]RQWDORYHUODSV The operation will not lead to any horizontal overlap between the activities of the parent companies of the Airline Group and NATS.
  • Punctuality League

    Punctuality League

    Published: January 2015 2014 Punctuality League On-time performance results for airlines and airports © 2015 OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited. All rights reserved OAG Punctuality League – Annual on-time performance results for airlines and airports Usage and attribution This information can be reproduced either in whole or in part, online or in print, for non-commercial purposes only but must include attribution to OAG and a link to www.oag.com. Disclaimer The intended recipient (“The Customer”) acknowledges that all data provided by or available through OAG is owned either by OAG Aviation Worldwide Ltd or by a third party provider (“The Owners”) and that the customer shall not acquire any ownership or interest in such data. OAG data is solely for the benefit and purposes of the intended recipient and may not be disclosed to, used by or copied by anyone other than the intended recipient. OAG Aviation Worldwide Ltd has used reasonable efforts in collecting and preparing data in the report but cannot and does not warrant that the information contained in this report is complete or accurate. OAG Aviation Worldwide Ltd hereby disclaims liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions in this report. 2 © 2015 OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited. All rights reserved Contents Foreword 5 Overview 6 Categories and Criteria 6 Airports: Small Category – <10m seats per annum 8 Airports: Medium Category – 10-20m seats per annum 10 Airports: Large Category – >20m seats per annum 12 Top Airlines: All 14 Top Airlines: Mainline Category
  • Royal Air Maroc to Join Oneworld®

    Royal Air Maroc to Join Oneworld®

    NEWS RELEASE Royal Air Maroc to Join oneworld® 12/5/2018 Leading global alliance signs Africa’s leading unaligned airline — oneworld’s rst full member from the continent and rst recruit globally for six years NEW YORK — Royal Air Maroc, one of Africa’s leading and fastest-growing airlines, will join oneworld®, the world’s premier airline alliance. Its election as a oneworld member-designate was announced when the chief executives of the alliance’s 13 current member airlines, including American, gathered in New York for their year-end Governing Board meeting. The announcement came just weeks before the alliance celebrates the 20th anniversary of its launch. Royal Air Maroc is expected to become part of oneworld in mid-2020 when it will start ying alongside some of the biggest and best brands in the airline business. Its regional subsidiary, Royal Air Maroc Express, will join as a oneworld aliate member at the same time. Royal Air Maroc As part of the alliance, Royal Air Maroc will oer the full range of oneworld customer services and benets; more than 1 million members of the airline’s Safar Flyer loyalty program will be able to earn and redeem rewards on all oneworld member airlines and with its top-tier members able to use the alliance’s more than 650 airport lounges worldwide. While Southern Africa’s Comair, which ies as a franchisee of British Airways, has been a oneworld aliate member since the alliance launched in February 1999, Royal Air Maroc will be oneworld’s rst full member from Africa — the only continent, apart from Antarctica, where the alliance hasn’t had a full member.
  • Introducing Oneworld Connect — a New Way for Airlines to Link to the World’S Premier Alliance

    Introducing Oneworld Connect — a New Way for Airlines to Link to the World’S Premier Alliance

    NEWS RELEASE Introducing oneworld connect — a New Way for Airlines to Link to the World’s Premier Alliance 6/3/2018 Fiji Airways to be rst oneworld connect partner; talks progressing with other carriers from around the world SYDNEY — oneworld is launching a new platform for linking up with the world’s premier airline alliance, enabling customers to enjoy more services and benets across an even more extensive global network. The rst airline to join in the new capacity as a oneworld connect partner will be Fiji Airways. A date will be announced at a later time for when Fiji Airways will start oering oneworld connect services and benets (see below). In the meantime, it is business as usual. oneworld connect is the rst new membership platform unveiled by oneworld since the alliance was originally announced 20 years ago. oneworld is in discussion with other carriers interested in participating in the program, from various parts of the world, including the Americas, Asia-Pacic and Europe. Each oneworld connect partner will need to have a minimum of three oneworld members as its sponsors to be initiated into the program. The initial oneworld sponsors of Fiji Airways will be all four of oneworld’s founding members – American Airlines, British Airways, Cathay Pacic and Qantas. The Australian carrier will additionally mentor Fiji Airways through its oneworld connect implementation process. American, Cathay Pacic and Qantas already codeshare and have frequent yer links with Fiji Airways. British 1 Airways and Fiji Airways are currently discussing areas for potential bilateral cooperation. WHAT ONEWORLD CONNECT MEANS FOR CUSTOMERS oneworld connect partners will provide select alliance benets to frequent yers from any oneworld member airline traveling on their ights, with a more extensive range of benets oered with their oneworld sponsors.
  • Parliament of the Republic of Fiji Parliamentary Debates Daily Hansard Thursday, 27Th May, 2021 [Corrected Copy]

    Parliament of the Republic of Fiji Parliamentary Debates Daily Hansard Thursday, 27Th May, 2021 [Corrected Copy]

    PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF FIJI PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DAILY HANSARD THURSDAY, 27TH MAY, 2021 [CORRECTED COPY] C O N T E N T S Pages Minutes … … … … … … … … … … … 1214 Communications from the Chair … … … … … … … 1214-1215 Presentation of Papers & Certain Documents … … … … … … 1215 Presentation of Reports of Committees … … … … … … 1215-1220 Review Report on the Investment Bill 2020 Government Guarantee – Fiji Airways … … … ... … … 1220-1257 Suspension of Standing Orders … … … … … … … … 1257 Review Report – FBC 2016 & 2017 Consolidated Annual Report … … … 1257-1274 Review of Audit Reports – Management of Duty Concession Scheme & Management of Prisoners, Employees & Assets Management Scheme … … 1275-1285 Questions … … … … … … … … … … 1285-1297 Oral Questions (1) Review of OMRS Policy (Q/No. 108/2021) (2) Maritime Travellers Rights (Q/No. 109/2021) (3) Confidentiality of Information – COVID-19 (Q/No. 110/2021) (4) Mushroom Production and Supply in Fiji (Q/No. 111/2021) (5) Navua Fire Station (Q/No. 112/2021) (6) Housing Authority’s Debt Relief Assistance Programme (Q/No. 113/2021) (7) Electricity Subsidy Scheme (Q/No. 114/2021) (8) Measures to Curb Road Accidents (Q/No. 115/2021) Written Questions (1) Gravel Extraction Licences (Q/No. 116/2021) (2) Transport Subsidy (Q/No. 117/2021) (3) School Dropout – 2018-2020 (Q/No. 118/2021) THURSDAY, 27TH MAY, 2021 The Parliament met at 9.47 a.m. pursuant to adjournment. HONOURABLE SPEAKER took the Chair and read the Prayer. PRESENT All Honourable Members were present, except the Honourable M. Bulanauca, the Honourable I. Kuridrani and the Honourable Ratu T. Navurelevu. MINUTES HON. LEADER OF THE GOVERNMENT IN PARLIAMENT.- Mr. Speaker, Sir, I move: That the Minutes of the sitting of Parliament held on Wednesday, 26th May, 2021, as previously circulated, be taken as read and be confirmed.