DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix H Needs Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix H Needs Assessment Appendix H Needs Assessment www.camsys.com ALAMEDA COUNTY GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN Task 3c – Identify Gaps, Needs, Issues and Deficiencies Technical Memorandum prepared for Alameda County Transportation Commission prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with AECOM Alameda County and MTC Regional Goods Movement Plans Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Opportunities for Alameda County ........................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Stakeholders Issues Identification Process ................................................................ 1-7 2.0 Goods Movement System on Local Streets and Roads Issues ................................... 2-1 2.1 Local Truck Routes Designation ................................................................................ 2-5 2.2 Truck Routes Connectivity ........................................................................................ 2-9 2.3 Local Truck Route Conflicts with Other Modes ....................................................... 2-20 2.4 Levels of Service (LOS) ........................................................................................... 2-23 2.5 Truck Routes Conflicts with Land Use ..................................................................... 2-29 2.6 Pavement and Bridge Conditions............................................................................ 2-30 2.7 Local Roads Safety ................................................................................................. 2-35 2.8 Truck Parking Issues ............................................................................................... 2-38 2.9 Local Roads Case Studies ....................................................................................... 2-42 3.0 Interregional and Intraregional Issues .................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Roadway Issues ........................................................................................................ 3-5 3.2 Rail Needs ............................................................................................................... 3-20 4.0 Global Gateway Issues .......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Port-Related Issues ................................................................................................... 4-4 4.2 Air Cargo Issues ...................................................................................................... 4-10 5.0 Crossing-Cutting Issues ......................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Air Quality and Public Health Impacts from Freight Pollution ................................... 5-4 5.2 Climate Change Effects .......................................................................................... 5-19 5.3 Industrial Land Shortage......................................................................................... 5-27 5.4 Truck Driver Shortage ............................................................................................. 5-28 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. i Alameda County and MTC Regional Goods Movement Plans List of Tables Table 1.1 Summary One-on-One Interest Group Outreach ................................................. 1-9 Table 2.1 Summary of Countywide Needs Assessment of Truck Route System on Local Streets and Roads ................................................................................................ 2-2 Table 2.2 Major Arterials with Poor LOS............................................................................ 2-24 Table 2.3 Minor Arterials with Poor LOS ........................................................................... 2-25 Table 2.4 Alameda County and Jurisdictions Truck Route Pavement Conditions and Maintenance Cost Comparison .......................................................................... 2-32 Table 2.5 Alameda County Total Number of Injury and Fatal Traffic Crashes on Local Roads – 2008 t0 2012 ...................................................................................................... 2-35 Table 3.1 Summary of Countywide Needs Assessment of Interregional and Intraregional Corridors .............................................................................................................. 3-2 Table 3.2 Top Truck Delay segments in Alameda County, AM Peak, 2010 ........................... 3-7 Table 3.3 Top Existing Truck Delay Segments in Alameda County, PM Peak, 2010 ............. 3-9 Table 3.4 Corridor-Level Reliability Results, AM Peak, 2014 .............................................. 3-12 Table 3.5 Corridor-Level Reliability Results, PM Peak. 2014 .............................................. 3-12 Table 3.6 Top Truck-Involved Crash Segments in Alameda County, 2008 to 2012 ............. 3-13 Table 3.7 Severity of Truck-Involved Crashes along the Three Top Truck Crash Corridors, 2008 to 2012 ...................................................................................................... 3-16 Table 3.8 Time-of-Day Distribution of Truck-Involved Crashes along the Three Top Truck Crash Corridors, 2008 to 2012 ............................................................................ 3-16 Table 3.9 Truck-Involved Crash Types along the Three Top Truck Crash Corridors, 2008 to 2012 ....................................................................................................................3-17 Table 3.10 Pavement Conditions of Major Freeways and State Routes, 2014 ...................... 3-18 Table 3.11 Practical Capacity of Rail Lines in Alameda County Area .................................... 3-25 Table 3.12 Average Daily Train Volumes in Alameda County and Bay Area ......................... 3-26 Table 3.13 Rail Lines Level of Service in Alameda County Area ........................................... 3-28 Table 3.14 Future Train Volumes in Alameda County Area .................................................. 3-30 Table 3.15 Rail Lines 2020 Forecast Level of Service in Alameda County Area .................... 3-33 Table 3.16 At-Grade Crossings Accidents on Mainline Routes ............................................. 3-40 Table 3.17 At-Grade Crossings on UP Oakland Subdivision ................................................. 3-43 Table 3.18 At-Grade Crossings on UP Coast Subdivision - Oakland to Newark .................... 3-44 Table 4.1 Summary of Countywide Needs for Global Gateways .......................................... 4-2 Table 5.1 Summary of Countywide Crossing Cutting Needs ................................................ 5-2 Table 5.2 Average Potential Cancer Risk (per million) in West Oakland by Source Areas in 2005, with Revisions Based on Truck Survey ...................................................... 5-12 Table 5.3 CARB Diesel Air Toxic Control Measures for Heavy-Duty Vehicles, Equipment and Ships .................................................................................................................. 5-14 Table 5.4 Emission Changes for Port of Oakland, 2005 to 2012 ......................................... 5-18 Table 5.5 SLR Risk Profile of Goods Movement Assets ...................................................... 5-21 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. iii Alameda County and MTC Regional Goods Movement Plans List of Figures Figure 2.1 Alameda County Truck Routes and Truck Restricted/Prohibited Routes, 2014 ..... 2-7 Figure 2.2 Alameda County Truck Routes and Truck Counts, 2012 ....................................... 2-8 Figure 2.3 Existing Truck Routes and Land Uses in Alameda County .................................. 2-15 Figure 2.4 Existing Land Uses around Truck Routes – East Alameda County ...................... 2-16 Figure 2.5 Existing Land Uses around Truck Routes – South Alameda County .................... 2-17 Figure 2.6 Existing Land Uses around Truck Routes – Central Alameda County .................. 2-18 Figure 2.7 Existing Land Uses around Truck Routes – North Alameda County .................... 2-19 Figure 2.8 Permitted Heavy Weight Corridor Routes (Green Zone) by Port of Oakland ...... 2-13 Figure 2.9 Existing Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit) Bus Routes and Planned BRT in Alameda County ................................................................. 2-22 Figure 2.10 LOS Conditions on Truck Routes, AM Peak ........................................................ 2-27 Figure 2.11 LOS Conditions on Truck Routes, PM Peak, 2014 ............................................... 2-28 Figure 2.12 Bridge Conditions on Tier 2 and Tier 3 Truck Routes .......................................... 2-34 Figure 2.13 Top Truck Crash Locations in Alameda County .................................................. 2-37 Figure 3.1 Top 10 Delay Locations, AM Peak Period, 2010 .................................................... 3-8 Figure 3.2 Top 10 Delay Locations, PM Peak Period, 2010 .................................................. 3-10 Figure 3.3 Number of Truck-Involved Crashes per Segment on Interregional and Intraregional Corridors in Alameda County ............................................................................. 3-15 Figure 3.4 Bridge Conditions on Tier 1 Truck Routes ........................................................... 3-19 Figure 3.5 Rail Subdivisions in Alameda County ................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor
    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor AltamontAltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor What is the Altamont Corridor Vision? The Altamont Corridor that connects the San Joaquin Valley to the Bay Area is one of the most heavily traveled, most congested, and fastest growing corridors in the Northern California megaregion. The Bay Area Council estimates that congestion will increase an additional 75% between 2016 and 2040. To achieve state and regional environmental and economic development goals, a robust alternative is needed to provide a sustainable / reliable travel choice and greater connectivity. The Altamont Corridor Vision is a long-term vision to establish a universal rail corridor connecting the San Joaquin Valley and the Tri-Valley to San Jose, Oakland, San Francisco and the Peninsula. This Vision complements other similar investments being planned for Caltrain, which is in the process of electrifying its corridor and rolling stock; Capitol Corridor, which is moving its operations to the Coast Subdivision as it improves its service frequency and separates freight from passenger service; a new Transbay Crossing, which would allow for passenger trains to flow from Oakland to San Francisco; the Dumbarton Rail Crossing, which is being studied to be brought back into service; and Valley Rail, which will connect Merced and Sacramento. The Vision also complements and connects with High- Speed Rail (HSR), and would enable a one-seat ride from the initial operating segment in the San Joaquin Valley throughout the Northern California Megaregion. One-Hour One-Seat One Shared Travel Time Ride Corridor Shared facilities, Oakland, Stockton, Express service, integrated Peninsula, Modesto modern rolling ticketing, San Jose stock timed connections • The limited stop (two intermediate stops) travel time between Stockton and San Jose is estimated to be 60 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 181/Wednesday, September 18
    Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 18, 2013 / Notices 57447 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and Tracy, California from July 22 to will address the ACEforward Program. If July 30, 2013. The program’s purpose the ultimate-build concept is to be Federal Railroad Administration and need and the description of implemented in the future, it would be alternatives under consideration for the the subject of a separate environmental Environmental Impact Statement for proposed action were presented at these review process. the ACEforward Program From meetings. Scoping materials and As of June 2013, the SJRRC is now Merced, Modesto and Stockton to San information concerning the scoping advancing the ACEforward Program. Jose, California meetings is available through the ACEforward is consistent with the Metropolitan Transportation AGENCY: Federal Railroad SJRRC’s Internet site: http:// Administration (FRA) U.S. Department www.acerail.com/About/Public- Commission Bay Area Regional Rail of Transportation (DOT). Projects/ACEforward. Plan, which identified the Altamont ADDRESSES: Written comments on the Corridor as a key future northern ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an California regional rail route. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). scope of the ACEforward Program EIR/ EIS, including the program’s purpose ACEforward will build upon the Bay SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to and need, the alternatives to be Area Regional Rail Plan and the prior advise other agencies and the public considered, the impacts to be evaluated planning for the ACRP. ACEforward is that FRA and the San Joaquin Regional and the methodologies to be used in the also consistent with the CHSRA 2012 Rail Commission (SJRRC) will jointly evaluations, should be provided to the Business Plan in relation to providing prepare an Environmental Impact FRA and/or SJRRC within thirty (30) an opportunity to connect existing Statement (EIS) and Environmental days of the publication of this notice.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Union Pacific Railroad Oakland
    PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Union Pacifi c Railroad Oakland Subdivision Corridor Improvement Study Executive Summary For the: Alameda County Public Works Agency Prepared by: Alta Planning + Design In Partnership with: HDR Engineering, Inc. and LSA Associates November 2009 Funded by: Alameda County Public Works Agency Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority City of San Leandro The Union Pacific Railroad Oakland Subdivision Corridor Improvement Study A Feasibility Study Analyzing the Potential for a Multi-Use Pathway Following the Oakland Subdivision Including On-Street, Rail-With-Trail and Rail-To-Trail Alternatives Alameda County Public Works Agency Prepared by: Alta Planning + Design, Inc. In Partnership with: HDR Engineering, Inc. LSA Associates November 2009 Acknowledgements Alameda County Board of Supervisors Scott Haggerty, District 1 Gail Steele, District 2 Alice Lai-Bitker, President, District 3 Nate Miley, Vice-President, District 4 Keith Carson, District 5 Director of Alameda County Public Works Agency Daniel Woldesenbet, Ph.D., P.E. Technical Advisory Committee Paul Keener, Alameda County Public Works Agency Rochelle Wheeler, Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority Keith Cooke, City of San Leandro Reh-Lin Chen, City of San Leandro Mark Evanoff, City of Union City Joan Malloy, City of Union City Don Frascinella, City of Hayward Jason Patton, City of Oakland David Ralston, City of Oakland Jay Musante, City of Oakland Tim Chan, BART Planning Sue Shaffer, BART Real Estate Thomas Tumola, BART Planning Jim Allison, Capital Corridor Joint Powers Authority Katherine Melcher, Urban Ecology Diane Stark, Alameda County Congestion Management Agency Supporting Agencies Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority Alameda County Congestion Management Agency East Bay Regional Park District Metropolitan Transportation Commission Alameda County Staff Paul J.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION This Agenda Shall Be Made Available Upon Request in Alternative Formats to Persons with A
    Chair, Bob Johnson, City of Lodi Commissioner, Bob Elliott, San Joaquin County Vice Chair, Steve Dresser, City of Lathrop Commissioner, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Debby Moorhead, City of Manteca Commissioner, Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Commissioner, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, John Marchand, City of Livermore Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12132) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code § 54954.2). Persons requesting a disability related modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting should contact San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission staff, at (209) 944-6220, during regular business hours, at least twenty-four hours prior to the time of the meeting. All proceedings before the Commission are conducted in English. The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission does not furnish interpreters and, if one is needed, it shall be the responsibility of the person needing one. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Director located at 949 East Channel Street, Stockton, California, 95202 during normal business hours or by calling (209) 944-6220. The Agenda is available on the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission website: www.acerail.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakland to San Jose and Sacramento to Auburn
    SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN for FRA Grant Applications 2010 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - CAPITOL CORRIDOR: Oakland to San Jose and Sacramento to Auburn Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority August 5, 2010 (this page left blank intentionally) 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Background – The Capitol Corridor Service .................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 3.1 Capitol Corridor’s Role in Regional Transportation/Land Use ................................................................... 14 3.2 The California State Rail Plan and CCJPA’s Vision Plan .............................................................................. 17 3.3 Sorting Through Choices and Making Sound Decisions ............................................................................. 19 3.4 Summary – the Complete Package ............................................................................................................ 22 4 Identification of Alternatives .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.17 Transportation and Traffic
    Environmental Impact Analysis Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority Transportation and Traffic 3.17 Transportation and Traffic 3.17.1 Introduction This section describes the regulatory setting and environmental setting for transportation and traffic in the vicinity of the Proposed Project (including all track variants, technology variants, and the Greenville and Mountain House initial operating segments [IOS]) and the alternatives analyzed at an equal level of detail (Southfront Road Station Alternative, Stone Cut Alignment Alternative, West Tracy Operation and Maintenance Facility [OMF] Alternative, Mountain House Station Alternative, and Downtown Tracy Station Parking Alternatives 1 and 2). It also describes the impacts on transportation and traffic that would result and mitigation measures that would reduce significant impacts, where feasible. There would be no differences in the physical impacts related to hydrology and water quality due to the diesel multiple unit (DMU), hybrid battery multiple unit (HBMU), battery-electric multiple unit (BEMU), or diesel locomotive haul (DLH) technology variants, so the discussion in this section does not discuss those variants. Potential impacts associated with implementation of the Proposed Project and the alternatives analyzed at an equal level of detail assume the larger environmental footprint at proposed and alternative stations associated with a potential IOS (i.e., Greenville IOS, Mountain House IOS, Southfront Road Station Alternative IOS, and Mountain House Alternative IOS) and/or the expanded parking in 2040. As such, the analysis of the Proposed Project and the alternatives analyzed at an equal level of detail below considers the potential impacts associated with a potential IOS and/or the expanded parking in 2040.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions
    CAPITOL CORRIDOR SOUTH BAY CONNECT Frequently Asked Questions DECEMBER 2020 PROJECT BACKGROUND WHY IS THIS PROJECT NEEDED? Shifting Capitol Corridor over to the Coast Subdivision will reduce rail congestion on the Niles and Centerville Line by eliminating 14 Capitol Corridor trains daily on those lines. It also provides riders with a faster, more direct trip between Oakland and San Jose and connects to existing transbay bus and shuttle services at the proposed Ardenwood Station. This passenger and freight rail operational improvement is one of several identified by State and Local agencies for phased implementation to improve our ability to connect and move people and goods within the Northern California Megaregion. As the only transit service that directly connects the Greater Sacramento region to the Bay Area and Silicon Valley, Capitol Corridor provides essential access and a travel alternative to driving on congested freeways in the area. WHICH STUDIES IDENTIFIED THE NEED FOR THIS PROJECT? South Bay Connect service route was listed within CCJPA’s 2014 Vision Plan Update and 2016 Vision Implementation Plan, as well as in the 2018 California State Rail Plan and Plan Bay Area 2040. The project’s rail improvements are also consistent with the Alameda CTC 2016 Goods Movement Plan, Countywide Transit Plan and 2018 Rail Safety Enhancement Program, the 2017 Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study, and Dumbarton Forward Design Alternatives Assessment. The collective plans establish a clear roadmap for Capitol Corridor that identifies service improvements to be implemented over time. PROJECT OVERVIEW WHAT IS THE SOUTH BAY CONNECT PROJECT? The South Bay Connect project proposes to relocate the Capitol Corridor passenger rail service between the Oakland Coliseum and Newark from the Union Pacific Railroad (UP) Niles Subdivision rail line to the Coast Subdivision rail line.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum 6.9
    Memorandum 6.9 DATE: April 20, 2017 SUBJECT: Introduction to Alameda CTC Rail Strategy Study RECOMMENDATION: Receive update on the Rail Strategy Study Summary This memo provides an introduction to the Alameda County Transportation Commission’s Rail Strategy Study. The Study will include a technical analysis of opportunities to improve the inter-regional rail access to and from the Port of Oakland, including understanding the needs of passenger rail services that share the railroad rights of way with freight, and propose a prioritization framework for advancing grade crossing improvements along key rail corridors. The Study is an outgrowth of recommendations contained in the Countywide Goods Movement Plan and the Countywide Transit Plan and will transition from high-level planning to a document with discrete, implementable improvements with defined cost, scope, and schedule. The Study is a one-year effort, and is expected to be complete in December 2017. This update focuses on preliminary information from the Existing Conditions analysis. The memo provides an overview of freight and passenger rail operations in the County, describes key features and conditions of the infrastructure, and identifies some of the major operational and infrastructure challenges for the rail system. Preliminary data on at-grade crossing issues is also provided. The memo concludes with a summary of next steps that will be undertaken to complete the Study. Background The rail system in Alameda County is a critical transportation link playing a unique role for both people and goods movement. Alameda County contains the core of the Bay Area/Northern California freight and passenger rail system.
    [Show full text]
  • MTCREGIONALGOODS MOVEMENTPLAN Draft Technical
    www.camsys.com MTC REGIONAL GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN Task 3C – Identify Gaps, Needs, Issues, and Opportunities Draft Technical Memorandum prepared for Metropolitan Transportation Commission prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with AECOM Transportation Analytics MTC Regional Goods Movement Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Summary of Needs and Issues in the Bay Area.................................................. 1-3 1.2 Opportunities for Bay Area ............................................................................ 1-24 1.3 Stakeholders Issues Identification Process ...................................................... 1-30 2.0 Goods Movement Corridors Assessment ......................................................... 2-1 2.1 The I-880 Corridor............................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 The I-80 Corridor ........................................................................................... 2-32 2.3 The I-580 Corridor .......................................................................................... 2-56 2.4 The U.S. 101 Corridor ..................................................................................... 2-78 2.5 The I-680 Corridor ........................................................................................ 2-103 2.6 The SR 12/SR 37 Corridors ............................................................................. 2-115
    [Show full text]
  • Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board San Carlos, California a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Among
    Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board San Carlos, California A Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement among: City and County of San Francisco San Mateo County Transit District Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD San Carlos, California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 Prepared by the Finance Division This Page Left Intentionally Blank Table of Contents Page I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal ........................................................................................................................... i Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Certificate of Achievement ............................. x Board of Directors ............................................................................................................................ xi Executive Management ................................................................................................................... xii Organization Chart ......................................................................................................................... xiii Map ................................................................................................................................................. xiv Table of Credits ............................................................................................................................... xv II. FINANCIAL SECTION
    [Show full text]
  • Plans and Programs Committee
    Commission Chair Alameda County Transportation Commission Mark Green, Mayor – Union City meeting as a committee of the whole as the Commission Vice Chair Scott Haggerty, Supervisor – District 1 PLANNING, POLICY AND LEGISLATION COMMITTEE AC Transit Greg Harper, Director MEETING NOTICE Alameda County Monday, May 9, 2011, 11:00 A.M. Supervisors 1333 Broadway, Suite 300, Oakland, California 94612 Nadia Lockyer – District 2 Wilma Chan – District 3 (see map on last page of agenda) Nate Miley – District 4 Keith Carson – District 5 Chair: Director Greg Harper Vice Chair: Councilmember Olden Henson BART Thomas Blalock, Director Members: Mayor Mark Green Supervisor Scott Haggerty Supervisor Keith Carson Mayor Jennefir Hosterman City of Alameda Mayor Marshall Kamena Councilmember Joyce Starosciak Rob Bonta, Vice Mayor Staff Liaisons: Beth Walukas Tess Lengyel City of Albany Executive Director: Arthur L. Dao Farid Javandel, Mayor Clerk of the Commission: Gladys V. Parmelee City of Berkeley Laurie Capitelli, Councilmember AGENDA City of Dublin Copies of Individual Agenda Items are Available on the: Tim Sbranti, Mayor Alameda CTC Website -- www.AlamedaCTC.org City of Emeryville Ruth Atkin, Councilmember 1 Pledge of Allegiance City of Fremont Suzanne Chan, Vice Mayor 2 Public Comment City of Hayward Members of the public may address the Committee during “Public Comment” on Olden Henson, Councilmember any item not on the agenda. Public comment on an agenda item will be heard City of Livermore when that item is before the Committee. Only matters within the Committee’s Marshall Kamena, Mayor jurisdictions may be addressed. Anyone wishing to comment should make their City of Newark desire known by filling out a speaker card and handling it to the Clerk of the Luis Freitas, Vice Mayor Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Union Pacific Railroad Oakland Subdivision Corridor Improvement Study
    PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Union Pacifi c Railroad Oakland Subdivision Corridor Improvement Study For the: Alameda County Public Works Agency Prepared by: Alta Planning + Design In Partnership with: HDR Engineering, Inc. and LSA Associates November 2009 Funded by: Alameda County Public Works Agency Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority City of San Leandro The Union Pacific Railroad Oakland Subdivision Corridor Improvement Study A Feasibility Study Analyzing the Potential for a Multi-Use Pathway Following the Oakland Subdivision Including On-Street, Rail-With-Trail and Rail-To-Trail Alternatives Alameda County Public Works Agency Prepared by: Alta Planning + Design, Inc. In Partnership with: HDR Engineering, Inc. LSA Associates November 2009 Acknowledgements Alameda County Board of Supervisors Scott Haggerty, District 1 Gail Steele, District 2 Alice Lai-Bitker, President, District 3 Nate Miley, Vice-President, District 4 Keith Carson, District 5 Director of Alameda County Public Works Agency Daniel Woldesenbet, Ph.D., P.E. Technical Advisory Committee Paul Keener, Alameda County Public Works Agency Rochelle Wheeler, Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority Keith Cooke, City of San Leandro Reh-Lin Chen, City of San Leandro Mark Evanoff, City of Union City Joan Malloy, City of Union City Don Frascinella, City of Hayward Jason Patton, City of Oakland David Ralston, City of Oakland Jay Musante, City of Oakland Tim Chan, BART Planning Sue Shaffer, BART Real Estate Thomas Tumola, BART Planning Jim Allison, Capital Corridor Joint Powers Authority Katherine Melcher, Urban Ecology Diane Stark, Alameda County Congestion Management Agency Supporting Agencies Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority Alameda County Congestion Management Agency East Bay Regional Park District Metropolitan Transportation Commission Alameda County Staff Paul J.
    [Show full text]