DOCSLIB.ORG

Oakland to San Jose and Sacramento to Auburn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oakland to San Jose and Sacramento to Auburn SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN for FRA Grant Applications 2010 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - CAPITOL CORRIDOR: Oakland to San Jose and Sacramento to Auburn Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority August 5, 2010 (this page left blank intentionally) 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Background – The Capitol Corridor Service .................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 3.1 Capitol Corridor’s Role in Regional Transportation/Land Use ................................................................... 14 3.2 The California State Rail Plan and CCJPA’s Vision Plan .............................................................................. 17 3.3 Sorting Through Choices and Making Sound Decisions ............................................................................. 19 3.4 Summary – the Complete Package ............................................................................................................ 22 4 Identification of Alternatives .............................................................................................................................. 22 4.1 No-Action Alternative ................................................................................................................................ 22 4.2 Other Modes as Alternatives ..................................................................................................................... 23 4.3 Alternatives Summary ................................................................................................................................ 23 5 Planning Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 23 6 Demand and Revenue Forecasts ........................................................................................................................ 26 6.1 Demand Forecasts ...................................................................................................................................... 27 6.1.1 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 27 6.1.2 Study Area Definition ............................................................................................................................. 27 6.1.3 Data Sources .......................................................................................................................................... 27 6.1.4 Travel Model .......................................................................................................................................... 29 6.1.5 Model Forecasts – Explanation .............................................................................................................. 34 6.2 Revenue Forecasts ..................................................................................................................................... 35 6.2.1 Ticket Revenue Forecasts ...................................................................................................................... 35 6.2.2 Auxiliary Revenue Forecasts .................................................................................................................. 36 7 Operations Modeling .......................................................................................................................................... 36 7.1 Modeling Methodologies ........................................................................................................................... 36 CCJPA 2010 CCSEP – Service Development Program Page 4 7.2 Operating Timetables ................................................................................................................................. 40 7.3 Equipment Consists .................................................................................................................................... 41 7.4 Rail Infrastructure Characteristics .............................................................................................................. 43 7.5 Outputs ...................................................................................................................................................... 43 7.6 Equipment and Train Crew Scheduling ...................................................................................................... 48 7.6.1 SDP1 and SDP2 Trainset and Crew Turns ................................................................................................ 48 8 Station and Access Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 50 8.1 Existing Stations ......................................................................................................................................... 50 8.2 New or Expanded Stations in the SDP ........................................................................................................ 51 8.3 Stations and Intermodal Connectivity ........................................................................................................ 51 8.4 Station Access ............................................................................................................................................ 52 9 Conceptual Engineering and Capital ................................................................................................................... 52 9.1 Project Identification .................................................................................................................................. 53 9.1.1 Project 1 – Reno Rail yard to Sacramento Double Track PROJECT (Included in SDP1) ........................... 55 9.1.2 Project 3 – Hayward Double Track (Elmhurst to Industrial Parkway) (Not part of FY 2010 Application) 58 9.1.3 Project 4 – Newark-Albrae Siding Connection Including South Switching Lead Extension for Newark Yard (Included in SDP2) ....................................................................................................................................... 58 9.1.4 Project 5 – CP Coast-Rte 237 (Gold Street) Double Track Project (Not part of FY 2010 Application) ... 58 9.1.5 Project 6 – Change of Route Alignment from the UPRR Niles Subdivision to the UPRR Oakland Subdivision (Industrial Parkway to Shinn) (Not part of FY 2010 Application) ..................................................... 58 9.1.6 Project 7 – Union City Station and Track Work Improvements on the UPRR Oakland Subdivision (Not part of FY 2010 Application) ............................................................................................................................... 58 9.1.7 Project 8 – Fremont Track two Full Platform Extension (Included in SDP2) .......................................... 59 9.1.8 Project 9: Alternative A and Alternative B (Not part of FY 2010 Application) ....................................... 59 9.1.9 Project 10 – San Jose Diridon Station Track and Platform Upgrade (Fully funded with FY 2009 HSIPR funds – a required project for achieving 11 RTs) ................................................................................................ 60 9.1.10 Project 11 – Fourth Track Project (Not part of FY 2010 Application) ................................................ 61 CCJPA 2010 CCSEP – Service Development Program Page 5 9.2 Project Cost Estimates ............................................................................................................................... 61 9.3 Program Schedule and Prioritization ......................................................................................................... 61 9.3.1 Project Prioritization .............................................................................................................................. 63 9.4 Conceptual Engineering Design Documentation ....................................................................................... 63 10 Operating and Maintenance Costs and Capital Replacement Forecast .............................................................. 63 10.1 Costing Methodology and Assumptions .................................................................................................... 65 10.1.1 Maintenance of Way ......................................................................................................................... 65 10.1.2 Maintenance of Equipment ............................................................................................................... 65 10.1.3 Transportation ................................................................................................................................... 65 10.1.4 Marketing and Information ............................................................................................................... 65 10.1.5 Call Center/Customer Information ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consequences-Of-Rail
    Consequences of Rail Vulnerability Explore the assets, sectors and vulnerabili5es within the county most likely to impact economic ac5vity and goods movement, and consider if local solu5ons can reduce both local and regional consequences. Creeks Infrastructure Marine Oil Terminal Refinery Rail Lines ¸ Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rlwy Union Pacific RR 0 1 2 Miles Copyright: ©2013 Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ 6. Increased congestion impacts transit dependent commuters, GHG emissions and air quality 2. Goods movement affected (Society & Equity + Environmental (Economic Consequences) Consequences) 5. Increased truck traffic 3. Impacts on co-located assets and congestion 1. Railroad (Varied Consequences) (Economic + Society & Vulnerabilities Equity Consequences) 4. Disruption of seaport 7. Interstate operations at Port of Vulnerabilities Richmond and Oakland (Economic + Society & Equity Consequences) 1 Railroad Vulnerabilities Fourteen miles of rail line in the project area is within or passes over the current 100-year floodplain. Seven more miles (or a total of twenty-one miles) may be exposed to a 100-year coastal storm with as little as 6 inches of sea level rise, and a total of forty- one miles may be exposed to a 100-year coastal storm with 30 inches of sea level rise. Lack of information • There is insufficient information available on the UP and BNSF rail lines in the project area to thoroughly evaluate the vulnerability of the rail infrastructure. Governance challenges • Some segments of rail located on the shoreline serve as the first line of defense against flooding, while some are protected by lands owned by others or levees paid for by the public. Not built to withstand flooding • Rail lines are not constructed or maintained to withstand flooding, storm events, wave action or rising groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • ACE Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    ACE train time schedule & line map San Jose View In Website Mode The ACE train line (San Jose) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) San Jose: 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM (2) Stockton: 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest ACE train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next ACE train arriving. Direction: San Jose ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops San Jose Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Stockton Station 949 Channel St, Stockton Tuesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Lathrop/Manteca Station Wednesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Tracy Station Thursday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Friday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Vasco Road Station South Vasco Road, Livermore Saturday Not Operational Livermore Station Pleasanton Station 403 Old Bernal Av, Pleasanton ACE train Info Direction: San Jose Fremont Station Stops: 10 37275 Fremont Bl, Fremont Trip Duration: 132 min Line Summary: Stockton Station, Lathrop/Manteca Great America Station Station, Tracy Station, Vasco Road Station, West Tasman Drive, Santa Clara Livermore Station, Pleasanton Station, Fremont Station, Great America Station, Santa Clara Station, Santa Clara Station San Jose Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara San Jose Station Direction: Stockton ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops Stockton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM San Jose Station Tuesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Santa Clara Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara Wednesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Great America Station Thursday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM
    [Show full text]
  • Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor
    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor AltamontAltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor What is the Altamont Corridor Vision? The Altamont Corridor that connects the San Joaquin Valley to the Bay Area is one of the most heavily traveled, most congested, and fastest growing corridors in the Northern California megaregion. The Bay Area Council estimates that congestion will increase an additional 75% between 2016 and 2040. To achieve state and regional environmental and economic development goals, a robust alternative is needed to provide a sustainable / reliable travel choice and greater connectivity. The Altamont Corridor Vision is a long-term vision to establish a universal rail corridor connecting the San Joaquin Valley and the Tri-Valley to San Jose, Oakland, San Francisco and the Peninsula. This Vision complements other similar investments being planned for Caltrain, which is in the process of electrifying its corridor and rolling stock; Capitol Corridor, which is moving its operations to the Coast Subdivision as it improves its service frequency and separates freight from passenger service; a new Transbay Crossing, which would allow for passenger trains to flow from Oakland to San Francisco; the Dumbarton Rail Crossing, which is being studied to be brought back into service; and Valley Rail, which will connect Merced and Sacramento. The Vision also complements and connects with High- Speed Rail (HSR), and would enable a one-seat ride from the initial operating segment in the San Joaquin Valley throughout the Northern California Megaregion. One-Hour One-Seat One Shared Travel Time Ride Corridor Shared facilities, Oakland, Stockton, Express service, integrated Peninsula, Modesto modern rolling ticketing, San Jose stock timed connections • The limited stop (two intermediate stops) travel time between Stockton and San Jose is estimated to be 60 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Perseverance & Progress Work Program and Budget
    2020/2021 Work Program and Budget Perseverance & Progress Built on solid ground, SJRRC will continue through this unprecedented crisis with vision and momentum. ® Table of Contents ® Executive Summary............................3 SJJPA..............................................11 ® Planning.............................................4 Organizational Chart.........................13 Operations.........................................6 Capital Budget.................................14 Stockton Diamond..............................8 ACE Operating Budget.....................15 Capital Projects..................................9 SJJPA Operating Budget .................16 The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board of Directors Christina Fugazi Debby Moorhead Scott Haggerty Chair, City of Stockton Commissioner, City of Manteca Commissioner, Alameda County Leo Zuber Nancy Young John Marchand Vice Chair, City of Ripon Commissioner, City of Tracy Commissioner, City of Livermore Bob Elliott Doug Kuehne Commissioner, San Joaquin County Commissioner, City of Lodi Stacey Mortensen Executive Director 2020/2021 Work Program and Budget 2 Executive Summary The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission is built on a ing forward and provides much needed jobs for many private solid foundation of political leadership, staff commitment planners, engineers, architects, and construction contractors. and adaptability. The difficult years of the 1998 ACE start- The Valley Rail Program will continue to press forward in the up, the 2003 dot.com implosion, and the 2009 full recession coming year with multiple environmental processes to keep have prepared the agency to deal with the unknowns of the the entire Program on-track and set to deliver transforma- coming year. Staff is prepared to work with less, cover extra tional service expansion for both ACE and the San Joaquins. workload and find ways to leverage and share resources with Also, included in the Capital Program are key passenger other partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information South San Francisco Station
    BASE Schedules & Fares Horario y precios del tránsito 時刻表與車費 Transit Holy Cross N Cemetery Treasure Island Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E RVservice, Park please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Stops ISABELLE CIR South San San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective January 1, 2020 LAWNDALE BLVD Transit (BART) rail service connects Colma Creek Francisco the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices are for riders using M I S S I O N R D Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. Clipper®. There is a a 50¢ sur- Map Key Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and A quick reference guide to service hours from this charge per trip for using magnetic Station other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. stripe tickets. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from South San Francisco Station From South San Francisco to: (stations listed in alphabetical order) El Camino 5-Minute Walk 1000ft/305m Weekday Saturday Sunday Costco Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip First Last First Last First Last High School Radius Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 4.70 9.40 South San Antioch 5:18a 12:01a 6:14a 12:01a 8:24a 12:03aWinston16th St. Mission 4.05 8.10 Children 4 and under ride free.
    [Show full text]
  • About Plumas County
    ABOUT PLUMAS COUNTY The area we presently call Plumas County (and lands adjoining it) was originally the home of the Maidu Indian tribe. The region’s abundant supply of game, fish, berries and seeds provided subsistence for these indigenous residents for several thousand years prior to the western migration of settlers. In 1821 Spanish explorer Luis Arguello arrived along the lower portion of the region’s main watershed (probably near it’s confluence with the Sacramento River). Arguello is credited with naming the river El Rio de las Plumas (The Feather River) after seeing what he thought were feathers floating in the water. Historians believe, however, that Arguello did not ever set foot in what is now Plumas County. In the 1850’s rumors of a fabled “Gold Lake” in the northeastern Sierras began circulating among the miners who had poured into California following the discovery of gold at Sutter’s mill. The upper reaches of the Feather River watershed were soon swarmed over by gold seekers who quickly displaced native Maidu residents in their quest for riches. Along with the miners came other settlers including a large Chinese population that remained in the region until the early 1900s. One of the early gold seekers, James Beckwourth, discovered the lowest pass through the Sierras (north of Reno, Nevada) at a point that now bears the name, Beckwourth Pass. The pass was opened to wagon travel via a toll road in 1851. More hospitable (due to its lower elevation) than the infamous Donner Pass, it made westward travel for new settlers safer and easier.
    [Show full text]
  • February 1994
    21 L Cg VOL. 52, NO 2 0 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL UNION NO. 3 ALAMEDA, CA FEBRUARY 1994 A .Il D . 1. I -«rr " u % - 4 4/ 1 4 4 * 4 0 4 t - to by Steve Moler 2 February 1994/ Engineers News Unions plan aggressive drive 14~6 11 Good LY on Clinton's health proposal Labor will bring to bear every available re- Security Act offered by President Clinton and source, doing"whatever it takes" to help enact the single-payer proposal of Rep. Jim McDer- H 4,m Welfare comprehensive health care reform, AFL-CIO mott (D-Wash.) and Sen. Paul Wellstone (D- President Lane Kirkland declared in a recent Minn.)-meet those criteria, Kirkland said. t -- , ,. AFL-CIO News report. The federation and its affiliates have under- ..1 %1.... >... It would be "a crime and a shame" to allow taken a massive education campaign complete other "phony bills" masquerading as reform to with field briefings, written materials and A couple of months ago in this column, I concluded undermine Clinton's proposal, he said. videos to help trade unionists understand the my thoughts on the NAFTA battle by saying:"Some- Kirkland pledged that workers and their stakes, the issues and the reasons for support- day we'll look Clinton in the eye and say, 'I told you unions would be "aggressive" in advancing a ing the Health Security Act. so.' Meanwhile, we've got other work to do." program that really deserves the name of The Health Care Reform Project, inaugurat- The "other work" I referred to was, of course, the Health Security Act." ed by Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Contra Costa County Department Of
    CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT 651 Pine Street, North Wing - 4th Floor Martinez, CA 94553-1229 Telephone: (925) 335-1201 Fax: (925) 335-1300 TO: Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee (Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, Chair; Supervisor Mary N. Piepho) FROM: John Greitzer, Transportation Planning Section DATE: September 29, 2008 SUBJECT: Potential reactivation of Mococo freight railroad line RECOMMENDATION: Review this report, discuss with Union Pacific officials at the Committee meeting, and consider providing a report to the full Board or other action as appropriate ATTACHMENTS: • Maps (2) provided by Union Pacific Railroad • Contra Costa Times article, August 18, 2008 • County maps (2) showing street crossings and schools along Union Pacific line The Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee has asked staff to provide a report on the potential reactivation of the “Mococo” freight railroad line in eastern Contra Costa County, as reported in recent newspaper articles, and the possible impacts of this action on communities along the route. This report responds to that request. Union Pacific Railroad staff will attend the meeting to discuss the issue with the Committee. Railroad representatives also are meeting with officials in the cities along the Mococo line. Background The Mococo line is the portion of the Union Pacific Railroad (UP) system between Martinez and Tracy in San Joaquin County. The name Mococo is short for Mountain Copper Company, a long- gone smelting operation just east of Martinez that used the railroad line in the early 1900s. From Martinez heading east, the tracks go through the Concord Naval Weapons Station, Bay Point, Pittsburg, Antioch, Oakley, Brentwood, and Byron, and continue southeast along Byron Highway to Tracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Solanoexpress Bus Routes Transit Information Fairfield Transportation Center Fairfield
    Regional Transit Map Transit REGIONAL TRANSIT DIAGRAM To To Eureka Clearlake Information Mendocino Transit DOWNTOWN AREA TRANSIT CONNECTIONS Authority To Ukiah Lake Oakland Mendocino Transit 12th Street Oakland City Center BART: Greyhound BART, AC Transit FA FA 19th Street Oakland BART: FA BART, AC Transit Cloverdale San Francisco Yolobus To Davis Civic Center/UN Plaza BART: Winters Fairfi eld and Suisun Transit SolanoExpress is Solano SolanoExpress is Solano BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Fairfield 101 Embarcadero BART & Ferry Terminal: County’s intercity transit connection. County’s intercity transit connection. BART, Golden Gate Transit, Muni, SamTrans, (FAST) is the local transit system Baylink, Alameda/Oakland Ferry, Alameda Harbor Faireld and Healdsburg Bay Ferry, Blue & Gold Fleet, Amtrak CA Thruway Suisun Transit SolanoExpress routes connect cities SolanoExpress routes connect cities Transit To Sacramento for Fairfi eld and Suisun City and also Mongomery Street BART: Healdsburg BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Dixon within the county and provide service within the county and provide service Calistoga Readi- operates many of the SolanoExpress (Operated by FAST) (Operated by SolTrans) Handi Powell Street BART: Transportation Ride Van Calistoga BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans regional routes. Please visit www.fasttransit. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. San Francisco Caltrain at 4th & King: Dixon Windsor Deer Caltrain, Muni, Amtrak CA Thruway org or call 707-422-BUSS (707-422-2877) for For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or Park Transbay Temporary Terminal: Guerneville AC Transit, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans, 80 visit www.solanoexpress.com.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA 1:30 P.M., Tuesday, January 24, 2017 Solano Transportation Authority One Harbor Center, Suite 130 Suisun City, CA 94585
    Solano Transportation Authority Member Agencies: Benicia Dixon Fairfield Rio Vista Suisun City Vacaville Vallejo Solano County One Harbor Center, Ste. 130, Suisun City, CA 94585-2473 Phone (707) 424-6075 / Fax (707) 424-6074 Email: [email protected] Website: sta.ca.gov INTERCITY TRANSIT CONSORTIUM MEETING AGENDA 1:30 p.m., Tuesday, January 24, 2017 Solano Transportation Authority One Harbor Center, Suite 130 Suisun City, CA 94585 ITEM STAFF PERSON 1. CALL TO ORDER Nathaniel Atherstone, Chair 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT (1:30 –1:35 p.m.) 4. ELECT CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR FOR 2017 5. REPORTS FROM MTC, STA STAFF AND OTHER AGENCIES (1:35 – 1:50 p.m.) A. Discussion of STA Board Workshop – Transit Operator’s Daryl Halls Presentation B. Status of Non-Ambulatory Intercity Service Philip Kamhi 6. CONSENT CALENDAR Recommendation: Approve the following consent items in one motion. (1:45 – 1:50 p.m.) A. Minutes of the Consortium Meeting of November 29, 2016 Johanna Masiclat (No meeting in December) Recommendation: Approve the Consortium Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2016. Pg. 5 CONSORTIUM MEMBERS Janet Koster Nathan Atherstone Brandon Thomson Mona Babauta Brian McLean Rachel Ford Judy Leaks Liz Niedziela (Chair) (Vice Chair) Dixon Fairfield and Rio Vista Solano County Vacaville County of Solano SNCI STA Readi-Ride Suisun Transit Delta Breeze Transit City Coach Dept. of Health & (FAST) (SolTrans) Social Svcs. Philip Kamhi STA Staff The complete Consortium packet is ava1ilable on STA’s website: www.sta.ca.gov C. Revised Fiscal Year (FY) 2016-17 Transportation Development Act Philip Kamhi (TDA) Matrix – February 2017 for Intercity Taxi Scrip Program Recommendation: Forward a recommendation to the STA TAC and Board to approve the Revised FY 2016-17 Solano TDA Matrix as shown in Attachment B for STA’s FY 2016-17 TDA claim.
    [Show full text]
  • ESCI Report Template Version C
    Pinole Fire Department Pinole, California REGIONAL FIRE SERVICE DELIVERY STUDY ADDENDUM March 2020 Regional Fire Service Delivery Study Addendum City of Pinole Fire Department TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................ iii Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... iv SECTION I: EVALUATION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS ...................................................................... 1 Current Conditions ............................................................................................................................ 2 Organizational Overview ............................................................................................................................ 2 Service Area & Infrastructure ...................................................................................................................... 5 Staffing Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Emergency Management ........................................................................................................................... 7 Fire Prevention ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Training ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]