Chapter 1 OVERVIEW of TRANSIT SYSTEM

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 1 OVERVIEW of TRANSIT SYSTEM 1 Chapter 1 which SP operated the service, but state and local OVERVIEW OF TRANSIT SYSTEM government agencies subsidized and adminis- tered it. Besides contract administration, Caltrans’ 1.1 BRIEF HISTORY responsibilities included planning, marketing, customer service, engineering and design, fare and Railroad service along the San Francisco Peninsula schedule setting, and performance monitoring. The has a long and storied history and has existed, in commuter service was renamed Caltrain. some form, since 1863. The railroad line, one of the oldest in California, was fi rst proposed in 1851 to connect the booming trade center of San Francis- co and the fi rst state capital of California, San Jose. Ground for the railroad was not broken until May 1861, when construction of the line began at San Francisquito Creek, on the Santa Clara-San Mateo county line. By October 1863, regular service be- gan between San Francisco and Mayfi eld (now the California Avenue station in Palo Alto). The con- struction of the line to San Jose was completed in January 1864, and two trains began operating daily between San Francisco and San Jose. Prior to Caltrain’s current ownership, passenger rail ridership on the Peninsula was at its peak in the In 1987, representatives of the City and County mid-1940s, when more than 9.54 million patrons of San Francisco, the San Mateo County Transit rode the train annually. However, as the cost of District (“District”) and the Santa Clara County operating the Peninsula commuter rail service in- Transit District, now the Santa Clara County Valley creased, and the number of riders began to decline, Transportation Authority (VTA), began the effort to the former Southern Pacifi c Railroad (SP) began to create the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board phase out its less patronized trains, and by the mid- (JPB) to transfer administrative responsibility for 1970s sought to discontinue passenger rail service. Caltrain from the state to the local level. In July After extended negotiations, SP, the California 1991, a Joint Powers Agreement, signed by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and the three parties, stipulated the JPB membership and three counties through which the Peninsula Com- powers, specifi ed fi nancial commitments for each mute Service operated (San Francisco, San Mateo, member agency, delegated the San Mateo County and Santa Clara counties) reached an agreement to Transit District as the managing agency, and de- preserve passenger rail service on the Peninsula. tailed other administrative procedures. Beginning in 1980, Caltrans Rail Management and The JPB purchased the 51.4-mile Caltrain right of Rail Operation branches administered a purchase- way from Southern Pacifi c in December 1991 for of-service agreement with Southern Pacifi c under a cost of $212 million. In July 1992, San Mateo CALTRAIN SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY2008 - FY2017 3 County Transit District personnel assumed the of Directors appointed by the Board representing management and administration of the JPB, and the the City of San Jose or the County of Santa Clara; JPB assumed ownership of Caltrain, contracting (2) a member of the VTA Board of Directors ap- with Amtrak as its operator. In 1992, the commute pointed by that Board representing the County of service from Gilroy also began. In the 16 years that Santa Clara or a city in Santa Clara County other the JPB has owned Caltrain, ridership has increased than the City of San Jose; and (3) the County’s rep- 60 percent. resentative to the MTC, or if this person declines to serve, then the MTC appointee of the Cities Selec- In 2002, Caltrain weekend service was suspended tion Committee, or if this person declines to serve, for two years to allow for construction of the CTX then a member of the VTA Board of Directors as project. With new rolling stock and upgraded infra- appointed by that Board. structure, Baby Bullet express service was initiated in June 2004. Ridership immediately began to JPB Directors do not have any terms as prescribed increase. However, within a year Caltrain was fac- by the JPB; they serve at the discretion of their ap- ing fi nancial diffi culties and decided to overhaul the pointing authority. entire schedule and offer more express service in order to attract additional riders, particularly those The current members of the JPB include: making longer trips. The re-invention of Caltrain • Jim Hartnett - Chair occurred in August 2005, with a decrease of local trains in the peak and a doubling of express ser- • Don Gage - Vice Chair vice to 22 Baby Bullet trains a day. Sustained and • José Cisneros signifi cant ridership increases continue as ridership • Nathaniel P. Ford Sr. levels have just recently surpassed the 2001 peak of Jerry Hill• Jerry Hill• 35,000 riders per weekday. • Arthur Lloyd 1.2 GOVERNANCE • Forrest Williams • Ken Yeager BOARD OF DIRECTORS Vacant• The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board in- cludes representatives from San Francisco, San ADVISORY COMMITTEES Mateo, and Santa Clara counties. The JPB consists There are four advisory committees offering Cal- of nine members, three from each county. train management input on a regular basis. These are as follows: The San Francisco representatives include an ap- • The Staff Coordinating Council (SCC) is com- pointee from the Mayor’s offi ce, an appointee from prised of staff from the three partner agencies. the San Francisco County Board of Supervisors, Responsibilities include review and coordina- and an appointee from the San Francisco Munici- tion of upcoming board agenda items. pal Transportation Agency. The three San Mateo • The Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) is County representatives are all members of the San comprised of nine representatives, three from Mateo County Transit District’s Board of Directors, each member county, appointed by the JPB. but three different appointing authorities designate The committee acts in an advisory capacity a representative from the Transit District’s Board, to the JPB. Responsibilities include provid- as follows: The Transit District Board; the San ing input on the needs of current and potential Mateo County Board of Supervisors; and the City’s transit users. Selection Committee of the Council of Mayors of San Mateo County. The Santa Clara County repre- • The Bicycle Advisory Committee is comprised sentatives include (1) a member of the VTA Board of Caltrain and Amtrak staff and representa- tives from the community with an interest in 4 CALTRAIN SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY2008 - FY2017 bicycle issues as they relate to Caltrain. Re- CONTRACT OPERATOR sponsibilities include reviewing and provid- Through an operating agreement with the JPB, ing input on policies and actions that relate to Amtrak provides services to manage and operate Caltrain’s bicycle guidelines and programs. Caltrain on the corridor between San Francisco and • The Accessibility Advisory Committee is com- Gilroy. Under contract with the JPB, Amtrak is re- prised of District staff, members of agencies sponsible for the maintenance, repair, and cleaning representing persons with disabilities, and Cal- of equipment and property directly related to train train customers with disabilities. Responsibili- operations. Amtrak also is responsible for checking ties include reviewing and providing input on tickets on Caltrain, selling tickets at staffed sta- access to train cars, stations and other Caltrain tions, and submitting various fi nancial and opera- services. tional reports to the JPB. Amtrak is also required to conduct ridership counts and passenger surveys, as needed. The operating contract is awarded on 1.3 THE ORGANIZATION a competitive bid basis. The current contract with Amtrak was extended for three years with two one- The JPB is a joint powers authority created by year optional years. The three-year extension of the agreement pursuant to Government Code Sec- base term under the contract with Amtrak will ex- tions 6500 et seq. The three member agencies of pire on June 30, 2009. The JPB Board of Directors this joint powers authority are the City and County recently exercised the fi rst-year option to further of San Francisco, the San Mateo County Transit extend the contract which will continue the man- District (“District”) and the Santa Clara Valley agement and operating arrangement with Amtrak Transportation Authority. The joint powers agree- from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010. Should ment creating this agency designates the District as the JPB exercise the second one-year option, the the Managing Agency of the JPB. The JPB has no term of the current contract with Amtrak could run direct employees. Rather employees of the District, through June 30, 2011. the Managing Agency, serve as staff to the JPB. Under this contractual arrangement, the General LABOR UNION REPRESENTATION Manager/CEO of the District, serves the JPB as The JPB utilizes fi ve full-time equivalent employ- its Executive Director. The Executive Director is ees from the SamTrans Unit Repair section to repair supported by fi ve chief offi cers that oversee Admin- and maintain Caltrain’s Ticket Vending Machines. istration, Communications, Development, Finance These workers are covered by the labor agreement and Operations. See Figure 1-1. between SamTrans and the Amalgamated Transit Union Local Division No. 1574 AFL-CIO-CLC. DISTRICT STAFF This agreement is in effect from October 11, 2005 District staff provides administrative management through June 30, 2008. for the Caltrain system. The Rail Transportation Department is responsible for the day-to-day opera- 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES AND tion of Caltrain and provides direct oversight of the contract operator, Amtrak. Other District depart- SERVICE AREA ments provide staff support in engineering, fi nance, capital project development, project monitoring, RAIL SERVICE planning, marketing, customer service, public and Caltrain serves 32 stations along the 77.2-mile route media relations, fare and schedule setting, perfor- between San Francisco and Gilroy, as illustrated mance monitoring, personnel recruitment, budget in the system map presented in Figure 1-2.
Recommended publications
  • Transit Information Rockridge Station Oakland
    B I R C H C T Transit N Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Claremont Middle Stops OAK GROVE AVE K Rockridge L School San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective May 26, 2018 A Transit (BART) rail service connects W 79 Drop-off Station the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices include a 50¢ sur- 51B Drop-off 79 Map Key Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. charge per trip for using magnetic E A quick reference guide to service hours from this stripe tickets. Riders using (Leave bus here to Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and T transfer to 51A) other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. Clipper® can avoid this surcharge. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and U Oakland Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from Rockridge Station From Rockridge to: N (stations listed in alphabetical order) 3-Minute Walk 500ft/150m Weekday Saturday Sunday I M I L E S A V E Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip Radius First Last First Last First Last Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 2.50 5.00 M H I G H W AY 2 4 511 Real-Time Departures Antioch 5:48a 12:49a 6:19a 12:49a 8:29a 12:49a 16th St.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Peninsula Rail Program Moves Forward Caltrain and the House Gas Emissions and California High Speed Rail Railroad Safety
    Caltrain Winter 2010 Connection Information for Customers Peninsula Rail Program Moves Forward Caltrain and the house gas emissions and California High Speed Rail railroad safety. Authority are on track with a The Peninsula Rail plan to modernize and elec- Program project team is trify the Caltrain corridor and developing a draft of high- to introduce high speed rail in speed train project alterna- California. tives for the Caltrain corridor, A number of community taking into account the public forums were held to outline comment and input received the issues and identify over the last year. opportunities that a The alternatives will combined Caltrain/high-speed consider whether the addition rail project can address, of two additional tracks for including train noise and high-speed can be accom- The future vision of Caltrain running electric multiple units vibrations, air quality, green- out of Millbrae station. continued on page 5 Caltrain Addresses Recent Delays Wheelchair lift won’t retract. too will be delayed. Also, if the train evaluation of both the locomotive and Signal is displaying red. Engine can’t get to its destination on time and passenger car fleet to identify areas “flip” to head in the opposite direc- of maintenance that should be en- won’t start. Trespasser steps in tion, those customers also will be late. hanced to not only provide increased path of train. The 90 weekday trains are operated reliability, but to provide the ride with only 20 train sets. That means quality and comfort level the No matter what the reason it has that one train set plays an integral role continued on page 3 the same result: delayed trains, in moving Caltrain’s resulting, more importantly, in delayed customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information South San Francisco Station
    BASE Schedules & Fares Horario y precios del tránsito 時刻表與車費 Transit Holy Cross N Cemetery Treasure Island Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E RVservice, Park please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Stops ISABELLE CIR South San San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective January 1, 2020 LAWNDALE BLVD Transit (BART) rail service connects Colma Creek Francisco the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices are for riders using M I S S I O N R D Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. Clipper®. There is a a 50¢ sur- Map Key Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and A quick reference guide to service hours from this charge per trip for using magnetic Station other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. stripe tickets. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from South San Francisco Station From South San Francisco to: (stations listed in alphabetical order) El Camino 5-Minute Walk 1000ft/305m Weekday Saturday Sunday Costco Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip First Last First Last First Last High School Radius Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 4.70 9.40 South San Antioch 5:18a 12:01a 6:14a 12:01a 8:24a 12:03aWinston16th St. Mission 4.05 8.10 Children 4 and under ride free.
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Governance
    Caltrain Governance JPB Special Meeting #3 on Governance June 25, 2021 Welcome to Special Meeting #3 2 • Review Meeting #3 Objectives and Special Meeting Governance Process Roadmap • Staff Presentations #3 Agenda • Approach to Regional and Non-Self Directed Relationships • Active and Emerging Discussions • Strategic Issues ~ Break ~ • Discussion • Next Steps 3 Special Meeting #3 Objectives and Process Roadmap 4 JPB Governance 2021 Roadmap Goals: Goals: - Exploration and education about the JPB’s range of structural - Discussion of selected option(s) and financial and legal analysis towards developing governance paths. the 2021 governance recommendation. - Selection of governance options and key issues to focus on in Phase 2. - Adoption of governance recommendation at December 2021 JPB meeting. 2021 January February March April May June July August September October November December Process Ad Process Ad Process Ad Process Ad Process Ad Process Ad Process Ad Process Ad Process Ad Process Ad Process Ad Hoc #1 Hoc #2 Hoc #3 Hoc #4 Hoc #5 Hoc #6 Hoc #7 Hoc #8 Hoc #9 Hoc #10 Hoc #11 Board Adoption Special Special Special Special Special of 2021 Meeting #1 Meeting #2 Meeting #3 Meeting #4 Meeting #5 Governance Recommendation We Are Here 5 JPB Governance 2021 Roadmap Goals: Goals: - Exploration and education about the JPB’s range of structural - Discussion of selected option(s) and financial and legal analysis towards developing governance paths. the 2021 governance recommendation. - Selection of governance options and key issues to focus on
    [Show full text]
  • Rider's Guide
    FAIRFIELD AND SUISUN TRANSIT RIDER’S GUIDE FAIRFIELD AND SUISUN TRANSIT CONTENTS Introduction................................................................. Want.to.Learn.How.to.Ride.the.Bus?......................... Planning.Your.Trip...................................................... Waiting.for.the.Bus.....................................................4 Boarding.the.Bus........................................................5 What.If.I.Use.a.Wheelchair,.Scooter,.or.Walker?.......6 Bicycles......................................................................8 Traveling.with.Children...............................................9 Paying.Your.Fare........................................................9 Clipper.Card............................................................. Transfers..................................................................2 Riding.the.Bus..........................................................2 Requesting.a.Stop....................................................4 What.If.I.Miss.My.Stop?............................................5 SolanoExpress.........................................................5 Transit.Training.........................................................6 Transit.Ambassador.Training...................................6 Solano.Mobility.Call.Center......................................7 For.document.translation,.please.call: English Para.traducción.de.documentos,. Spanish llame.al:. 對於文檔翻譯電話 Chinese Đối với tài liệu gọi dịch: Vietnamese Para.sa.mga.dokumento.tawag.sa. Filipino pagsasalin:
    [Show full text]
  • San Jose to Merced Project Section State's
    SUMMER 2019 SAN JOSE TO MERCED PROJECT SECTION STATE’S PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE OVERVIEW High-speed rail offers an unprecedented opportunity to modernize California’s transportation system and tie together the state’s economies. The San Jose to Merced Project Section will be the crucial connection between the Bay Area and the Central Valley. This fact sheet discusses the staff recommendation for the State’s Preferred Alternative to be considered by the California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) Board of Directors. WHAT IS A PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE? Since 2008, numerous alternatives have been considered Alternative. Authority staff is seeking feedback on this for the high-speed rail alignment traveling within and recommendation before it is presented to the Authority outside of the Bay Area. Ultimately, four alternatives Board of Directors in September 2019. are being analyzed for the Draft Environmental Impact Alternative 4 will be referred to as the staff-recommended Report/Statement (EIR/EIS). The alternative determined State’s Preferred Alternative until the Authority Board to best balance tradeoffs between environmental; of Directors concurs with the staff recommendation or community; and performance, operations, and cost factors requests that a different alternative be identified as the will be identified as the State’s Preferred Alternative. State’s Preferred Alternative. The identification of the Planning, design, and analysis of the four alternatives, State’s Preferred Alternative for the Draft EIR/EIS does collaboration with landowners and agencies, and input not express or imply approval or adoption of a preferred from the public and stakeholders has led Authority staff alternative for final design or construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Environmental Setting and Consequences
    CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND CONSEQUENCES CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND CONSEQUENCES This chapter presents information on the environmental setting in the project area as well as the environmental consequences of the No-Electrification and Electrification Program Alternatives. Environmental issue categories are organized in alphabetical order, consistent with the CEQA checklist presented in Appendix A. The project study area encompasses the geographic area potentially most affected by the project. For most issues involving physical effects this is the project “footprint,” or the area that would be disturbed for or replaced by the new project facilities. This area focuses on the Caltrain corridor from the San Francisco Fourth and King Station in the City and County of San Francisco to the Gilroy Station in downtown Gilroy in Santa Clara County and also includes the various locations proposed for traction power facilities and power connections. Air quality effects may be felt over a wider area. 3.1 AESTHETICS 3.1.1 VISUAL OR AESTHETIC SETTING The visual or aesthetic environment in the Caltrain corridor is described to establish the baseline against which to compare changes resulting from construction of project facilities and the demolition or alteration of existing structures. This discussion focuses on representative locations along the railroad corridor, including existing stations (both modern and historic), tunnel portals, railroad overpasses, locations of the proposed traction power facilities and other areas where the Electrification Program would physically change above-ground features, affecting the visual appearance of the area and views enjoyed by area residents and users. For purposes of this analysis, sensitive visual receptors are defined as corridor residents and business occupants, recreational users of parks and preserved natural areas, and students of schools in the vicinity of the proposed project.
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Business Plan
    Caltrain Business Plan JULY 2019 LPMG 6/27/2019 What Addresses the future potential of the railroad over the next 20-30 years. It will assess the benefits, impacts, and costs of different What is service visions, building the case for investment and a plan for the Caltrain implementation. Business Plan? Why Allows the community and stakeholders to engage in developing a more certain, achievable, financially feasible future for the railroad based on local, regional, and statewide needs. 2 What Will the Business Plan Cover? Technical Tracks Service Business Case Community Interface Organization • Number of trains • Value from • Benefits and impacts to • Organizational structure • Frequency of service investments (past, surrounding communities of Caltrain including • Number of people present, and future) • Corridor management governance and delivery riding the trains • Infrastructure and strategies and approaches • Infrastructure needs operating costs consensus building • Funding mechanisms to to support different • Potential sources of • Equity considerations support future service service levels revenue 3 Where Are We in the Process? Board Adoption Stanford Partnership and Board Adoption of Board Adoption of of Scope Technical Team Contracting 2040 Service Vision Final Business Plan Initial Scoping Technical Approach Part 1: Service Vision Development Part 2: Business Implementation and Stakeholder Refinement, Partnering, Plan Completion Outreach and Contracting We Are Here 4 Flexibility and Integration 5 What Service planning work to date has been focused on the development of detailed, Understanding illustrative growth scenarios for the Caltrain corridor. The following analysis generalizes the 2040 these detailed scenarios, emphasizing opportunities for both variation and larger “Growth regional integration within the service Scenarios” as frameworks that have been developed.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail! R ING
    High Speed Rail! Fast Facts At peak, about 100 trains per day through Gilroy About 25% would stop at new Gilroy station, remaining will pass through Gilroy at high speed Required Gilroy station parking structure would house 6,600-8,000 cars. The California High-Speed Rail project is a planned high-speed rail system in the state of 2010 California and headed byyg California High-Sppy()pjeed Rail Authority (CHSRA). The project was approved by California voters on November 4, 2008 with the passage of Proposition 1A authorizing US$9.95 billion in general obligation bonds for the project. The CHSRA is currently tasked with completing final planning, design, and environmental efforts. When built, high-speed trains capable of 220 mph (350 km/h) are anticipated to link San Francisco and Los Angeles in as little as two and a half hours. The planned system would also serve other major California cities, ING such as Sacramento, San Jose, Fresno, Bakersfield, and San Diego. The City of Gilroy is located R on the Merced to San Jose segment of the system . Plans are to have a station located in Gilroy , with approximately 25 percent of the trains stopping at the Gilroy station, and the other 75 percent going through the Gilroy area at high speed. Construction efforts are anticipated to begin by 2011. An implementation plan approved in August 2005 estimates that it would take eight to eleven SP years to "develop and begin operation of an initial segment of the California high-speed train.” Currently, intercity rail service does not directly serve the city of San Francisco (other than Caltrain, which connects San Francisco to various cities in San Mateo and Santa Clara counties, such as San Jose, Gilroy, Palo Alto, and Belmont).
    [Show full text]
  • Solanoexpress Bus Routes Transit Information Fairfield Transportation Center Fairfield
    Regional Transit Map Transit REGIONAL TRANSIT DIAGRAM To To Eureka Clearlake Information Mendocino Transit DOWNTOWN AREA TRANSIT CONNECTIONS Authority To Ukiah Lake Oakland Mendocino Transit 12th Street Oakland City Center BART: Greyhound BART, AC Transit FA FA 19th Street Oakland BART: FA BART, AC Transit Cloverdale San Francisco Yolobus To Davis Civic Center/UN Plaza BART: Winters Fairfi eld and Suisun Transit SolanoExpress is Solano SolanoExpress is Solano BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Fairfield 101 Embarcadero BART & Ferry Terminal: County’s intercity transit connection. County’s intercity transit connection. BART, Golden Gate Transit, Muni, SamTrans, (FAST) is the local transit system Baylink, Alameda/Oakland Ferry, Alameda Harbor Faireld and Healdsburg Bay Ferry, Blue & Gold Fleet, Amtrak CA Thruway Suisun Transit SolanoExpress routes connect cities SolanoExpress routes connect cities Transit To Sacramento for Fairfi eld and Suisun City and also Mongomery Street BART: Healdsburg BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Dixon within the county and provide service within the county and provide service Calistoga Readi- operates many of the SolanoExpress (Operated by FAST) (Operated by SolTrans) Handi Powell Street BART: Transportation Ride Van Calistoga BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans regional routes. Please visit www.fasttransit. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. San Francisco Caltrain at 4th & King: Dixon Windsor Deer Caltrain, Muni, Amtrak CA Thruway org or call 707-422-BUSS (707-422-2877) for For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or Park Transbay Temporary Terminal: Guerneville AC Transit, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans, 80 visit www.solanoexpress.com.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA 1:30 P.M., Tuesday, January 24, 2017 Solano Transportation Authority One Harbor Center, Suite 130 Suisun City, CA 94585
    Solano Transportation Authority Member Agencies: Benicia Dixon Fairfield Rio Vista Suisun City Vacaville Vallejo Solano County One Harbor Center, Ste. 130, Suisun City, CA 94585-2473 Phone (707) 424-6075 / Fax (707) 424-6074 Email: [email protected] Website: sta.ca.gov INTERCITY TRANSIT CONSORTIUM MEETING AGENDA 1:30 p.m., Tuesday, January 24, 2017 Solano Transportation Authority One Harbor Center, Suite 130 Suisun City, CA 94585 ITEM STAFF PERSON 1. CALL TO ORDER Nathaniel Atherstone, Chair 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT (1:30 –1:35 p.m.) 4. ELECT CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR FOR 2017 5. REPORTS FROM MTC, STA STAFF AND OTHER AGENCIES (1:35 – 1:50 p.m.) A. Discussion of STA Board Workshop – Transit Operator’s Daryl Halls Presentation B. Status of Non-Ambulatory Intercity Service Philip Kamhi 6. CONSENT CALENDAR Recommendation: Approve the following consent items in one motion. (1:45 – 1:50 p.m.) A. Minutes of the Consortium Meeting of November 29, 2016 Johanna Masiclat (No meeting in December) Recommendation: Approve the Consortium Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2016. Pg. 5 CONSORTIUM MEMBERS Janet Koster Nathan Atherstone Brandon Thomson Mona Babauta Brian McLean Rachel Ford Judy Leaks Liz Niedziela (Chair) (Vice Chair) Dixon Fairfield and Rio Vista Solano County Vacaville County of Solano SNCI STA Readi-Ride Suisun Transit Delta Breeze Transit City Coach Dept. of Health & (FAST) (SolTrans) Social Svcs. Philip Kamhi STA Staff The complete Consortium packet is ava1ilable on STA’s website: www.sta.ca.gov C. Revised Fiscal Year (FY) 2016-17 Transportation Development Act Philip Kamhi (TDA) Matrix – February 2017 for Intercity Taxi Scrip Program Recommendation: Forward a recommendation to the STA TAC and Board to approve the Revised FY 2016-17 Solano TDA Matrix as shown in Attachment B for STA’s FY 2016-17 TDA claim.
    [Show full text]