DOCSLIB.ORG

Federally-Listed Species That May Be Present in the Great Plains Region (Current As of 1 March 2005)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federally-Listed Species That May Be Present in the Great Plains Region (Current As of 1 March 2005) Federally-listed Species That May Be Present In The Great Plains Region (current as of 1 March 2005) * indicates critical habitat has been designated Common Name Scientific Name Status Location MAMMALS Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Black-footed ferret Mustela nigripes E Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming Canada lynx Lynx canadensis T Colorado, Montana, Wyoming Gray bat Myotis grisescens E Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma Colorado (south of I-70), Gray wolf Canus lupus E Oklahoma and Texas (west of I Southwestern DPS 35) Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Eastern/western DPSs T Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming Grizzly bear Ursus arctos horribilis T Montana, Wyoming Herpailurus Gulf Coast jaguarundi E Texas yagouaroundi cacomitli Indiana bat Myotis sodalis E Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma Ursus americanus Louisiana black bear T Texas luteolus Mexican long-nosed Leptonycteris nivalis E Texas bat Ocelot Leopardus pardalis E Texas Preble’s meadow Zapus hudsonius preblei T Colorado, Wyoming jumping mouse* BIRDS Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Bald eagle Haliaeetus luecocephalus T Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, Wyoming Black-capped vireo Vireo atricapilla E Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas Brown pelican Pelecanus occidentalis E Texas Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Eskimo curlew Numenius borealis E Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas Golden-cheeked Dendroica chrysoparia E Texas warbler Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Interior least tern Sterna antillarum E Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas Mexican spotted owl* Strix occidentalis lucida T Colorado, Texas Northern aplomado Falco femoralis E Texas falcon septentrionalis Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Piping plover* Charadrius melodus T Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas Red-cockaded Picoides borealis E Oklahoma, Texas woodpecker Southwestern willow Empidonax traillii E Colorado, Texas flycatcher extimus Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Whooping crane* Grus americanus E Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, Wyoming FISH Arkansas River Notropis girardi T Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas shiner* Big Bend gambusia Gambusia gaigei E Texas Bonytail* Gila elegans E Colorado Bull trout Salvelinus confluentus T Montana Clear Creek gambusia Gambusia heterochir E Texas Colorado Ptychocheilus lucius T Colorado pikeminnow* Comanche Springs Cyprinodon elegans E Texas pupfish Devils River minnow Dionda diaboli T Texas Fountain darter* Etheostoma fonticola E Texas Greenback cutthroat Oncorhynchus clarki T Colorado trout stomias Humpback chub* Gila cypha E Colorado Leon Springs Cyprinodon bovinus E Texas pupfish* Leopard darter* Percina pantherina T Oklahoma Neosho madtom Noturus placidus T Kansas, Oklahoma Ozark cavefish Amblyopsis rosae T Oklahoma Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Pallid sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus E Dakota, South Dakota Pecos gambusia Gambusia nobilis E Texas Razorback sucker* Xyrauchen texanus E Colorado San Marcos Gambusia georgei E Texas gambusia* Topeka shiner* Notropis topeka E Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota REPTILES Concho water snake* Nerodia paucimaculata T Texas Green sea turtle* Chelonia mydas T Texas Hawksbill sea turtle* Eretmochelys imbricata E Texas Kemp’s ridley sea Lepidochelys kempii E Texas turtle Leatherback sea Dermochelys coriacea E Texas turtle* Loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta T Texas AMPHIBIANS Barton Springs Eurycea sosorum E Texas salamander Houston toad* Bufo houstonensis E Texas San Marcos Eurycea nana T Texas salamander* Texas blind Typhlomolge rathbuni E Texas salamander Wyoming toad Bufo baxteri E Wyoming INVERTEBRATES American burying Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Nicrophorus americanus E beetle South Dakota Bee Creek Cave Texella reddelli E Texas harvestman Bone Cave Texella reyesi E Texas harvestman Braken Bat Cave Cicurina venii E Texas meshweaver* Coffin Cave mold Batrisodes texanus E Texas beetle Cokendolpher Cave Texella cokendolpheri E Texas harvestman* Comal Springs Stygoparnus comalensis E Texas dryopid beetle Government Canyon Cicurina vespera E Texas Bat Cave meshweaver Government Canyon Neoleptoneta microps E Texas Bat Cave spider Helotes mold beetle* Batrisodes venyivi E Texas Higgins' eye pearly Lampsilis higginsii E Nebraska mussel Kretschmarr Cave Texamaurops reddelli E Texas mold beetle Madla's Cave Cicurina madla E Texas meshweaver* Ouachita rock Arkansia wheeleri E Oklahoma pocketbook Pawnee montane Hesperia leonardus T Colorado skipper montana Peck’s Cave Stygobromus pecki E Texas amphipod Robber Baron Cave Cicurina baronia E Texas meshweaver* Scaleshell Mussel Leptodea leptodon E Oklahoma, South Dakota Tooth Cave ground Rhadine persephone E Texas beetle Tooth Cave Tartarocreagris texana E Texas pseudoscorpion Tooth Cave spider Neoleptoneta myopica E Texas Uncompahgre Boloria acrocnema E Colorado fritillary butterfly Unnamed ground Rhadine exilis E Texas beetle* Unnamed ground Rhadine infernalis E Texas beetle* Winged mapleleaf Quadrula fragosa E Kansas? mussel PLANTS Ashy dogweed Thymophylla tephroleuca E Texas Echinocereus Black lace cactus reichenbachii var. E Texas albertii Blowout penstemon Penstemon haydenii E Nebraska, Wyoming Bunched cory cactus Coryphantha ramillosa T Texas Chisos Mountain Echinocereus chisoensis T Texas hedgehog cactus var. chisoensis Clay-loving wild Eriogonum pelinophilum E Colorado buckwheat* Colorado butterfly Gaura neomexicana T Colorado, Nebraska, Wyoming plant* coloradensis Echinocereus viridiflorus Davis’ green pitaya E Texas var. davisii Desert yellowhead* Yermo xanthocephalus T Wyoming Dudley Bluffs Lesquerella congesta T Colorado bladderpod Dudley Bluffs Physaria obcordata T Colorado twinpod Gypsum wild- Eriogonum gypsophilum T Texas buckwheat* Hinckley oak Quercus hinckleyi T Texas Johnston’s frankenia Frankenia johnstonii E Texas Knowlton cactus Pediocactus knowltonii E Colorado Large-fruited sand- Abronia macrocarpa E Texas verbana Little Aguja Potamogeton E Texas pondweed clystocarpus Lloyd’s mariposa Echinomastus T Texas cactus mariposensis Mancos milk-vetch Astragalus humillimus E Colorado Meads milkweed Asclepias meadii T Kansas Sclerocactus mesae Mesa Verde cactus T Colorado verdae Navasota ladies’- Spiranthes parksii E Texas tresses Nellie cory cactus Coryphantha minima E Texas North Park phacelia Phacelia formosula E Colorado Osterhout milk-vetch Astragalus osterhoutii E Colorado Pecos sunflower Helianthus paradoxus T Texas Penland alpine fen Eutrema penlandii T Colorado mustard Penland beardtongue Penstemon penlandii E Colorado Slender rush-pea Hoffmannseggia tenella E Texas Sneed pincushion Coryphantha sneedii var. E Texas cactus sneedii South Texas ambrosia Ambrosia cheiranthifolia E Texas Star cactus Astrophytum asterias E Texas Terlingua Creek cat’s- Cryptantha crassipes E Texas eye Texas ayenia Ayenia limitaris E Texas Texas poppy-mallow Callirhoe scabriuscula E Texas Texas prairie dawn- Hymenoxys texana E Texas flower Texas snowbells Styrax texanus E Texas Texas trailing phlox Phlox nivalis ssp. texensis E Texas Texas wild rice* Zizania texana E Texas Tobusch fishhook Ancistrocactus tobuschii E Texas cactus Uinta Basin hookless Sclerocactus glaucus T Colorado cactus Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, Ute ladies'-tresses Spiranthes diluvialis T Wyoming Walker’s manioc Manihot walkerae E Texas Water howellia Howellia aquatilis T Montana Western prairie Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, Platanthera praeclara T fringed orchid Oklahoma White bladderpod Lesquerella pallida E Texas Zapata bladderpod* Lesquerella thamnophila E Texas .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colorado History Chronology
    Colorado History Chronology 13,000 B.C. Big game hunters may have occupied area later known as Colorado. Evidence shows that they were here by at least 9200 B.C. A.D. 1 to 1299 A.D. Advent of great Prehistoric Cliff Dwelling Civilization in the Mesa Verde region. 1276 to 1299 A.D. A great drought and/or pressure from nomadic tribes forced the Cliff Dwellers to abandon their Mesa Verde homes. 1500 A.D. Ute Indians inhabit mountain areas of southern Rocky Mountains making these Native Americans the oldest continuous residents of Colorado. 1541 A.D. Coronado, famed Spanish explorer, may have crossed the southeastern corner of present Colorado on his return march to Mexico after vain hunt for the golden Seven Cities of Cibola. 1682 A.D. Explorer La Salle appropriates for France all of the area now known as Colorado east of the Rocky Mountains. 1765 A.D. Juan Maria Rivera leads Spanish expedition into San Juan and Sangre de Cristo Mountains in search of gold and silver. 1776 A.D. Friars Escalante and Dominguez seeking route from Santa Fe to California missions, traverse what is now western Colorado as far north as the White River in Rio Blanco County. 1803 A.D. Through the Louisiana Purchase, signed by President Thomas Jefferson, the United States acquires a vast area which included what is now most of eastern Colorado. While the United States lays claim to this vast territory, Native Americans have resided here for hundreds of years. 1806 A.D. Lieutenant Zebulon M. Pike and small party of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE APPORTIONMENT of CORPORATE INCOME (Formulas for Tax Year 2021 -- As of January 1, 2021)
    STATE APPORTIONMENT OF CORPORATE INCOME (Formulas for tax year 2021 -- as of January 1, 2021) ALABAMA * Double wtd Sales MONTANA * 3 Factor ALASKA* 3 Factor NEBRASKA Sales ARIZONA * Sales/Double wtd Sales NEVADA No State Income Tax ARKANSAS * Sales NEW HAMPSHIRE Double wtd Sales CALIFORNIA * Sales NEW JERSEY Sales COLORADO * Sales NEW MEXICO * 3 Factor/Sales CONNECTICUT Sales NEW YORK Sales DELAWARE Sales NORTH CAROLINA * Sales FLORIDA Double wtd Sales NORTH DAKOTA * 3 Factor/Sales GEORGIA Sales OHIO N/A (2) HAWAII * 3 Factor OKLAHOMA 3 Factor IDAHO * Double wtd Sales OREGON Sales ILLINOIS * Sales PENNSYLVANIA Sales INDIANA Sales RHODE ISLAND Sales IOWA Sales SOUTH CAROLINA Sales KANSAS * 3 Factor SOUTH DAKOTA No State Income Tax KENTUCKY * Sales TENNESSEE Triple wtd Sales LOUISIANA Sales TEXAS Sales MAINE * Sales UTAH Sales MARYLAND (3) 75.0% Sales, 12.5% Property VERMONT Double wtd Sales & Payroll VIRGINIA Double wtd Sales/Sales MASSACHUSETTS Sales/Double wtd Sales WASHINGTON No State Income Tax MICHIGAN Sales WEST VIRGINIA * Double wtd Sales MINNESOTA Sales WISCONSIN * Sales MISSISSIPPI Sales/Other (1) WYOMING No State Income Tax MISSOURI * Sales DIST. OF COLUMBIA Sales Source: Compiled by FTA from state sources. Notes: The formulas listed are for general manufacturing businesses. Some industries have a special formula different from the one shown. * State has adopted substantial portions of the UDITPA (Uniform Division of Income Tax Purposes Act). Slash (/) separating two formulas indicates taxpayer option or specified by state rules. 3 Factor = sales, property, and payroll equally weighted. Double wtd Sales = 3 factors with sales double-weighted Sales = single sales factor (1) Mississippi provides different apportionment formulas based on specific type of business.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwestern Rare and Endangered Plants
    Preliminary Report on the Reproductive Biology of the Threatened Chisos Mountain Hedgehog Cactus BONNIE B. AMOS and CHRISTOS VASSILIOU Angelo State University, Texas Abstract: The Chisos Mountain hedgehog cactus (Echinocereus chisoensis, Cactaceae) is a narrow endemic restricted to an approximately 100 square mile area in Big Bend National Park, Texas. It was listed as threatened in 1987 as Echinocereus chisoensis var. chisoensis. An investigation of the reproductive biology and pollination ecology conducted in 1999 and 2000 revealed the taxon to be homogamous, self-incompatible, xenogamous, and heavily dependent upon the cactus oligolectic bee, Diadasia rinconis (Anthophoridae) for pollination. Despite infrequent bee visitation, fruit set from open pollination is high and fruits produce large numbers of seeds. Predation in 2002, probably from rodents as a result of severe drought conditions, was severe on plants, flower buds, and fruits. The Chisos Mountain hedgehog cactus, or Chisos jillo (Opuntia leptocaulis DC.), ocotillo (Fouquieria pitaya (Echinocereus chisoensis W. Marshall), is 1 of splendens K. Kunth), leatherstem (Jatropha dioica V. 20 threatened or endangered cacti listed by the de Cervantes), lechuguilla (Agave lechuguilla J. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Region 2 (http: Torrey), and ceniza (Leucophyl1umf)zltescens (J. Ber- // ecos. fws.gov/ webpage/ webpage-lead.htrnl? landier) I. M. Johnston). An earlier study (Hender- lead_region=2&type=L&listings=l).In 1987 it was shott et al. 1992) did not show specific E. chisoen- added to the federal lists (53 FR 38453) of en- sis-nurse plant associations, but rather showed dangered and threatened wildlife and plants as associations as a consequence of soil conditions threatened because of its restricted distribution, that provide a hospitablL environment for a diver- low numbers, loss of viability in existing popula- sity of species or the exploitation by E.
    [Show full text]
  • South Dakota Vs. Minnesota Trust Law Desk Reference Guide
    South Dakota vs. Minnesota Trust Law Desk Reference Guide Advantage South Dakota Minnesota For over 30 years, SD has been Like many states, MN has one of the best places to locate attempted to catch up to SD by a trust. A unique and active implementing the Uniform legislative trust committee, Trust Code. However, the Trust Location (Situs) favorable Legislature and difference is still clear and governor support continues to distinct, and the state does not rank SD as a top tier trust have the stability or support jurisdiction state; as verified by that SD enjoys from the industry leaders. government. In addition to many other taxes, MN taxes its trusts. In 2018, the There is no state personal, Fielding v. Commissioner of corporate, or fiduciary income Revenue decision highlighted tax, as well as no state tax on this major difference, holding State Taxes capital gains, dividends, that a trust set up as a MN trust interest, intangibles, or any may not need to stay a resident other income. This equates to trust for tax purposes for the NO state taxes on trust income. entire length of the trust (depending on circumstances). A Dynasty Trust has unlimited possibilities because there is no Rule Against Perpetuities MN has a Rule Against The Dynasty Trust - Legacy (abolished in 1983). Dynasty Perpetuities. By statute, all Trusts avoid federal estate and non-vested interests must vest Planning for Generations income taxation on trust assets (pass) 21 years after death of an because there is no forced asset individual or 90 years after its distribution and the bonus of creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding the Missouri Valley the Politics of Dam Site Selection and Design
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for Summer 1997 Flooding The Missouri Valley The Politics Of Dam Site Selection And Design Robert Kelley Schneiders Texas Tech University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Schneiders, Robert Kelley, "Flooding The Missouri Valley The Politics Of Dam Site Selection And Design" (1997). Great Plains Quarterly. 1954. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/1954 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. FLOODING THE MISSOURI VALLEY THE POLITICS OF DAM SITE SELECTION AND DESIGN ROBERT KELLEY SCHNEIDERS In December 1944 the United States Con­ Dakota is 160 feet high and 10,700 feet long. gress passed a Rivers and Harbors Bill that The reservoir behind it stretches 140 miles authorized the construction of the Pick-Sloan north-northwest along the Missouri Valley. plan for Missouri River development. From Oahe Dam, near Pierre, South Dakota, sur­ 1946 to 1966, the United States Army Corps passes even Fort Randall Dam at 242 feet high of Engineers, with the assistance of private and 9300 feet long.! Oahe's reservoir stretches contractors, implemented much of that plan 250 miles upstream. The completion of Gar­ in the Missouri River Valley. In that twenty­ rison Dam in North Dakota, and Oahe, Big year period, five of the world's largest earthen Bend, Fort Randall, and Gavin's Point dams dams were built across the main-stem of the in South Dakota resulted in the innundation Missouri River in North and South Dakota.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disastrous Impacts of Trump's Border Wall on Wildlife
    a Wall in the Wild The Disastrous Impacts of Trump’s Border Wall on Wildlife Noah Greenwald, Brian Segee, Tierra Curry and Curt Bradley Center for Biological Diversity, May 2017 Saving Life on Earth Executive Summary rump’s border wall will be a deathblow to already endangered animals on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border. This report examines the impacts of construction of that wall on threatened and endangered species along the entirety of the nearly 2,000 miles of the border between the United States and Mexico. TThe wall and concurrent border-enforcement activities are a serious human-rights disaster, but the wall will also have severe impacts on wildlife and the environment, leading to direct and indirect habitat destruction. A wall will block movement of many wildlife species, precluding genetic exchange, population rescue and movement of species in response to climate change. This may very well lead to the extinction of the jaguar, ocelot, cactus ferruginous pygmy owl and other species in the United States. To assess the impacts of the wall on imperiled species, we identified all species protected as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act, or under consideration for such protection by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“candidates”), that have ranges near or crossing the border. We also determined whether any of these species have designated “critical habitat” on the border in the United States. Finally, we reviewed available literature on the impacts of the existing border wall. We found that the border wall will have disastrous impacts on our most vulnerable wildlife, including: 93 threatened, endangered and candidate species would potentially be affected by construction of a wall and related infrastructure spanning the entirety of the border, including jaguars, Mexican gray wolves and Quino checkerspot butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Unionid Mollusks of the Missouri River on the Nebraska Border
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of Defense 1983 UNIONID MOLLUSKS OF THE MISSOURI RIVER ON THE NEBRASKA BORDER Ellet Hoke Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyceomaha Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Hoke, Ellet, "UNIONID MOLLUSKS OF THE MISSOURI RIVER ON THE NEBRASKA BORDER" (1983). US Army Corps of Engineers. 105. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyceomaha/105 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Army Corps of Engineers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. .-- UNIONID MOLLUSKS OF THE MISSOURI RIVER ON THE NEBRASKA BORDER ELLET HOKE 3000 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, NO. 63 WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50265, U.S.A. ABSTRACT The Missouri River, bordering Nebraska, has previously been reported to be uninhabitable for unionid mollusks. Studies conducted in the Missouri River and its backwaters, primarily during 1981 and 1982. revealed the presence of thirteen species and subspecies of unionid mollusks. The apparent absence of any extensive prior unionid work in the Missouri River may explain the discrepancy between this and previous literature. little has been written on the unionid fauna of the general understanding of the species present. The area Missouri River in general, and almost nothing on that portion selected for the survey extends from Santee, Nebraska to the of the river bordering Nebraska. Collections were reported confluence of the Platte and Missouri Rivers below Omaha during the nineteenth century from the Great Falls of the (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • OCELOT CLUB Volume 18, Number 1454 Fleetwood Drive East January - February 1974 Mobile, Alabama 36605 OCELOT CLUB
    Contents: Yukon Lynx Man ....................... Page 3 Pacific Northwest Report. ............ Page 4 Bengals, Bottles & Bleed II...... ....Page 5 Endangered Species Act. .............. Page 7 Readers Write. .......................Page 9 Greater New York Report.. ............Page 10 President's Statement. ............... Page 11 "El Tigre ............................. Page 12 Cougar Country ....................... Page 13 Florida Report ....................... Page 15 I- I LONG ISLAND OCELOT CLUB volume 18, Number 1454 Fleetwood Drive East January - February 1974 Mobile, Alabama 36605 OCELOT CLUB SULTAN, with Dave Salisbury of Cocoa, Florida. Our main interest was to see if it was possible to take a big cat, raise it as a loving pet and train it to perform. We've spent 14 months training Sultan to perform in our own act. Sultan is now four years old and weighs 143 pounds. Dave uses only the reward system to train Sultan and says that with Sultan's love of beef you need only to convey to him what has to be done in order to obtain the reward. Sultan has appeared in Life Magazine and on What's My Line? television show. Look for Sultan in the June or July issue of Playboy where he appears attired in hi-s sleek black coat. His co-star Miss Helen Rooney appears in a necklace. Dave is past President of the Florida Chapter and received a Lotty in 1969 for his work in LIOC. Branch Representatives: A. C. E. C. - Mrs. Ginny Story, 2475 Las Palomas, La Habra Heights, California 90631 CANADA - Mrs. Janet Thomas R.R.1, Box 602, Manotick, Ontario, (613j 692-4095 692-3728 CANADA - WEST- Doug Fletcher, 11431 73rd Ave., Delta, B.C., Canada Coordinator - Evelyn Dyck, 4911 Union St., North Burnaby, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Omaha-Council Bluffs Area Nebraska-Iowa by ROBERT D
    Geology of the Omaha-Council Bluffs Area Nebraska-Iowa By ROBERT D. MILLER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 472 Prepared as a part of a program of the Department of the Interior for the development of the Missouri River basin UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director Miller, Robert David, 1922- Geology .of the Omaha-Council Bluffs area, Iowa. 'iV ashington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1964. iv, 70 p. illus., maps (3 col.) diagrs., tables. 30 em. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 472) Part of illustrative matter fold. in pocket. Prepared as a part of a program of the Dept. of the Interior for the development of the Missouri River basin. Bibliography: p. 67-70. (Continued on next card) Miller, Robert David, 1922- Geology of the 0maha-Council Bluffs area, Nebraska-Iowa. 1964. (Card 2) 1. Geology-Nebraska-Omaha region. 2. Geology-Iowa-Council Bluffs region. I. Title: Omaha-Council Bluffs area, Nebraska-Iowa. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract __________________________________________ _ 1 Stratigraphy--Continued Introduction ______________________________________ _ 2 Quaternary System-Continued Location ______________________________________ _ 2 Pleistocene Serie!Y-Continued Present investigation ___________________________ _ 2 Grand Island Formation ________________ _ 23 Acknowledgments ______________________________ _ 3 Sappa Formation __________
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Housing Market Analysis for Kansas City, Missouri
    The analysis presented in this report was completed prior to the COVID-19 outbreak in the United States and therefore the forecast estimates do not take into account the economic and housing market impacts of the actions taken to limit contagion of the virus. At this time, the duration and depth of the economic disruption are unclear, as are the extent and effectiveness of countermeasures. HUD will continue to monitor market conditions in the HMA and provide an updated report/addendum in the future. COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS Kansas City, Missouri-Kansas U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research As of January 1, 2020 Share on: Kansas City, Missouri-Kansas Comprehensive Housing Market Analysis as of January 1, 2020 Executive Summary 2 Executive Summary Housing Market Area Description The Kansas City Housing Market Area (HMA), coterminous with the Kansas City, MO-KS Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), encompasses 14 counties along the border between Missouri and Kansas. For this analysis, the HMA is divided into two submarkets: (1) the Missouri submarket, which consists of Bates, Caldwell, Cass, Clay, Clinton, Jackson, Lafayette, Platte, and Ray Counties; and (2) the Kansas submarket, which consists of Johnson, Linn, Miami, Leavenworth, and Wyandotte Counties. The city of Kansas City is known for its style of jazz. In 2018, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization designated Kansas City Tools and Resources as a “City of Music,” the only such city in the United States. Find interim updates for this metropolitan area, and select geographies nationally, at PD&R’s Market-at-a-Glance tool.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas V. Oklahoma: Restoring the Notion of Partnership Under the Clean Water Act Katheryn Kim Frierson [email protected]
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 1997 | Issue 1 Article 16 Arkansas v. Oklahoma: Restoring the Notion of Partnership under the Clean Water Act Katheryn Kim Frierson [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Recommended Citation Frierson, Katheryn Kim () "Arkansas v. Oklahoma: Restoring the Notion of Partnership under the Clean Water Act," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 1997: Iss. 1, Article 16. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1997/iss1/16 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Arkansas v Oklahoma: Restoring the Notion of Partnership Under the Clean Water Act Katheryn Kim Friersont The long history of interstate water pollution disputes traces the steady rise of federal regulatory power in the area of environ- mental policy, culminating in the passage of the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1972.1 Arkansas v Oklahoma2 is the third and latest Supreme Court decision involving interstate water pol- lution since the passage of the 1972 amendments. By all ac- counts, Arkansas is wholly consistent with the Court's prior decisions. In Milwaukee v Illinois3 and InternationalPaper Co. v Ouellette,4 the Court held that the Clean Water Act ("CWA") preempted all traditional common law and state law remedies. Consequently, states lost much of their traditional authority to direct water pollution policies. Despite the claim that the CWA intended "a regulatory 'partnership' between the Federal Govern- ment and the source State", Milwaukee and InternationalPaper placed states in a subordinate position to the federal govern- t B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • MONTANA BIRTH CERTIFICATE APPLICATION Cascade County Clerk & Recorder, 121 4Th St N Ste 1B1 Great Falls, MT 59401 406-454-6718 IDENTIFICATION IS REQUIRED Picture I.D
    INSTRUCTIONS FOR ORDERING A BIRTH RECORD 1. Print, Fill out completely, and Sign application. (see below for who can order) 2. Provide proof of Identity (see acceptable methods below) 3. Enclose cashier’s check or money order (see Fees below) 4. Enclose a stamped self-addressed return envelope. (enclose a pre-paid envelope from express mail/UPS/FEDEX etc. for expedited service. We do not track mail once it leaves our office - keep all tracking info) 5. Mail application, I.D., payment, and return envelope to Cascade County Clerk and Recorder, 121 4th St N, Suite 1B1 Great Falls, MT 59401 WHO CAN ORDER A CERTIFIED BIRTH CERTIFICATE? Only those authorized by 50-15-121 MCA, which includes the registrant (14 years old or older) the registrant’s spouse, children, parents or guardian or an authorized representative, may obtain a certified copy of a birth record. Proof of relationship, guardianship or authorization is required. Step-relatives, in-laws, grandparents, siblings, aunts, uncles, cousins, ex-spouses, and a natural parent of an adoptive child or others are NOT eligible to receive a certified copy of a birth certificate. Non-certified informational/genealogy copies are available to anyone if record is more than 30 years old. Montana birth certificates are full size paper with a raised seal. Wallet size cards are not available. IDENTIFICATION IS REQUIRED •The person signing the request must provide an enlarged legible photocopy of both sides of their valid driver’s license or other legal picture identification with a signature, or the requestor must have the application notarized.
    [Show full text]