DOCSLIB.ORG

Tutorial on Oxidative Addition Jay A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tutorial on Oxidative Addition Jay A Tutorial pubs.acs.org/Organometallics Tutorial on Oxidative Addition Jay A. Labinger* Beckman Institute and Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91125, United States ABSTRACT: This tutorial introduces oxidative addition as a reactivity pattern and organizing principle for organometallic chemistry. The history, characteristics, and scope of oxidative addition are briefly surveyed, followed by a detailed examination of the variety of mechanisms found for the oxidative addition of alkyl halides and their relevance to practical applications. ■ INTRODUCTION comprehensive review but rather as an introduction to the The recognition of oxidative addition as a common pattern of topic, such as might be presented in a lecture, as part of a reactivity has played a central role in the development of course on organometallic chemistry. Accordingly, the tone is organometallic chemistry over the second half of the 20th rather informal, and citations have been limited to a moderate number of historically significant papers. Those interested in century. The starting point for modern organotransition-metal following up on any aspects can find more details and thorough chemistry is usually taken as the discovery and structural referencing elsewhere; Hartwig’s recent textbook5 is a good characterization of ferrocene in the early 1950s (of course, starting point. there were many important earlier contributions). That inspired a large amount of new chemistry during the next decade or ’ soso much, in fact, that it was not easy to codify it in any ■ VASKA S COMPOUND AND OXIDATIVE ADDITION rational manner. There was as yet no well-delineated set of The square-planar, d8, 16-electron Ir(I) complex trans-IrCl- ff fi reactivity patterns that had served so e ectively as organizing (CO)(PPh3)2 was rst synthesized rather serendipitously, principles over the preceding century of organic chemistry.1 apparently6by Vaska and DiLuzio in 1961.7 That report Notably, the two most popular organometallic chemistry included the reaction with HCl. A year later the same authors 8 textbooks of the 1960s were arranged according to periodic described analogous additions of Cl2 and, especially, H2. It group2 or ligand type.3 Either can be useful for categorizing soon became clear that Vaska’s compound, as it subsequently information, in its own way, but neither is particularly effective came to be universally known, is a highly versatile platform for in terms of explanatory power and pointing the way forward. the generalized reaction of eq 1. Examples of A−B, in addition The 1960s saw the beginnings of determined efforts toward to those already mentioned, include organic halides such as systematic, reactivity-based organization, well represented by MeI, metal halides such as SnCl4, metal hydrides such as R3SiH, Collman’s 1968 Accounts of Chemical Research article4 “Patterns etc.4 of Organometallic Reactions Related to Homogeneous I III Catalysis”, in which he identified electron count and Ir Cl(CO)(PPh32 )+−→ A B Ir ClAB(CO)(PPh32 ) (1) coordinative unsaturation as key concepts and described important reactivity patterns such as migratory insertion and, Since this reaction involves a net formal oxidation from Ir(I) especially, oxidative addition. This approach increasingly took to Ir(III) accompanied by increases in both coordination hold, culminating in the seminal 1980 text by Collman and number (4 to 6) and electron count (16 to 18), the term fi Hegedus,5 which clearly demonstrated its pedagogical oxidative addition seems obvious and logical; the rst person to 9 fi strengths. The great utility of reactivity- and mechanism- use it in this context though (so far as I have been able to nd) was not Vaska, but rather Collman, in a 1965 paper on the based thinking, which has been demonstrated in all aspects of 10 organotransition metal chemistryboth textbook and frontier related chemistry of Ru(CO)3(PPh3)2 (eq 2). Note that these sciencecan fairly be said to have all started with oxidative are not perfect analogues: while the formal oxidation state does addition. increase by 2 units, from Ru(0) to Ru(II), the starting This tutorial begins with the basic concept of oxidative compound is 5-coordinate, 18-electron, with one of the original addition and issues concerning its definition and scope. It then CO ligands being lost at some point. That raises the question even at this extremely early point in the historyof what a focuses on one particular class of oxidative addition, reactions “ ” of alkyl and aryl halides, emphasizing the mechanistic variety pattern really entails. Is stoichiometric similarity what matters, observed even for stoichiometrically similar transformations, and concludes with the relevance of mechanistic considerations Received: June 29, 2015 for some practical applications. It is not intended as a Published: October 26, 2015 © 2015 American Chemical Society 4784 DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.5b00565 Organometallics 2015, 34, 4784−4795 Organometallics Tutorial − ν and if so, how much variability should we allow? Or should O2 parameters the O O bond length and OO of the O2 ’ mechanistic similarity be the main criterion? To what extent adduct of Vaska s compound to those of free O2 and its anions. can we infer one from the other? These are important issues As Table 2 shows, the IrIII−peroxo picture looks by far the that will recur throughout the discussion. best.13 0 Ru (CO)332 (PPh )+− A B Table 2. Bond Parameters for Several O2 Species II →+Ru AB(CO)232 (PPh ) CO (2) ̂ ν −1 species rOO,A OO,cm ’ In retrospect, it is clear that Vaska s compound was the ideal dioxygen, O2 1.21 1556 − starting point for studying oxidative addition. We can change superoxide, O2 1.33 1145 2− ligands virtually at will: Cl to other X-type ligands, such as peroxide, O2 1.49 820 halides and pseudohalides, and PPh3 to other L-type ligands, IrCl(O2(CO)(PPh3)2 1.47 850 usually a tertiary phosphine or arsine.11 That flexibility provides ready access to examining electronic and steric effects on the kinetics and (in some cases) thermodynamics of the reaction. Monitoring kinetics is likewise convenient, using either visible As these are apparently “real” oxidations, at least by the ν or infrared spectroscopy. For the former, the starting material is criterion of CO, we can expect certain trends in thermody- yellow, while just about every oxidative adduct is colorless; the namic favorability, with the trends in kinetics quite possibly latter takes advantage of the fact that CO stretching bands in but not necessarilyrunning in parallel. These are mostly metal carbonyls are strong, sharp, and highly sensitive to the borne out in experience. For example, the equilibrium constants electronic environment at the metal center, reflecting the for formation of the H2 adduct of IrCl(CO)L2 follow the degree of back-bonding into the CO π* orbitals. fi sequence L = PPh3 <P(n-Bu)3 > P(cyclohexyl)3: the rst That last feature helps sheds light on an important question: inequality reflects the greater basicity/electron donating power are these reactions truly oxidative, or is this only in a formal of trialkyl- vs triarylphosphines, while the second reflects steric sense? (We do not normally think of H as an oxidizing agent, 2 crowding, which is more pronounced for the 6-coordinate but all one-electron ligands are conventionally treated as anions ff for the determination of formal oxidation state, including H−.) product than the 4-coordinate reactant. The e ect of varying Table 1 shows ν values for several examples of eq 1 the X ligand is generally less predictable, perhaps because the CO effects of electronegativity and π-donor ability can operate in Table 1. CO Stretching Frequencies for IrClAB(CO)(PPh ) opposing senses. 3 2 Comparing complexes of different metals, especially when − ν −1 A B CO,cm the differences extend across periodic groups and electronic none 1969 configurations, is complicated by effects of net charge, H2 1983 preference for 4- vs 5-coordination, etc. However, trends O2 2015 within more or less isostructural complexes from the same HCl 2045 periodic group are usually reliable. In particular, there is a CH3I 2047 general tendency for higher oxidation states to become Cl2 2075 increasingly favored on descending within a group of the periodic table (compare, for example, the M(VIII) species fi (including O2, which does not exactly t the model; we will FeO4, which is unknown, RuO4, a metastable, uncontrollably return to that shortly). Everything else being equal (which it powerful oxidant, and OsO4, a stable and useful reagent for ff strictly is not, since the geometries of the products di er: H2 organic oxidations), and that applies to oxidative additions: fi and O2 add in a cis con guration and the rest in trans), a higher thermodynamically for certain and often kinetically as well. For ν ff CO value indicates a higher e ective oxidation state. example, the H2 adducts of Rh complexes RhCl(CO)L2 are Note that the strong oxidant Cl2 gives the greatest increase in much less stable than those of Ir analogues; likewise, the rate of ν CO, while H2 appears to result in only a small (but real, and addition of RX is considerably slower for Rh than for Ir, an positive) change, as we might have expected. Actually the latter effect of which we will see in the very last section. − is somewhat misleading: metal hydrogen stretching vibrations This trend bears a good deal of responsibility for yet another − −1 fall in the same frequency range, typically 2000 2200 cm , generalization, that the best homogeneous catalysts are found and if symmetry permits, observed peaks represent mixed −1 among the second-row transition metals Ru, Rh and Pd in vibrations, so that the band at 1983 cm is not a pure CO particular.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oxidative Addition & Reductive Elimination
    3/1/2021 Oxidative Addition & Reductive Elimination Robert H. Crabtree: Pages 159 – 182 and 235 - 266 1 Oxidative Addition Change in Example Group configuration • Oxidative addition is a key step in many transition-metal catalyzed reactions 10 8 I III • Basic reaction: d d Cu Cu 11 X X Pd0 PdII 10 LnM + LnM Pt0 PtII 10 Y Y d8 d6 PdII PdIV 10 • The new M-X and M-Y bonds are formed using the electron pair of the X-Y PtII PtIV 10 bond and one metal-centered lone pair IrI IrIII 9 RhI RhIII 9 • The metal goes up in oxidation state (+2), X-Y formally gets reduced to X-, Y- d6 d4 ReI ReIII 7 • The ease of addition (or elimination) can be tuned by the electronic and 0 II steric properties of the ancillary ligands Mo Mo 6 • OA favored by strongly e-donating L d4 d2 MoII MoIV 6 • The most common applications involve: a) Late transition metals (platinum metals: Ru, Rh, Pd, Ir, Pt) - not d7 d6 2CoII 2CoIII 9 too sensitive to O2 and H2O; routinely used in organic synthesis b) C-Halogen, H-H or Si-H bonds d4 d3 2CrII 2CrIII 6 • Common for transition metals, rare for main-group metals but: Grignard reagents! 2 1 3/1/2021 Oxidative addition – concerted mechanism Concerted addition - mostly with non-polar X-Y bonds X X X LnM + LnM LnM Y Y Y A Cr(CO)5: • H2, silanes, alkanes, ... coordinatively Cr(PMe3)5: • Arene C-H bonds more reactive than alkane C-H bonds unsaturated, but metal- centered lone pairs not phosphines are better • H-H, C-H strong bond, but M-H and M-C bonds can be very available donors, weaker acceptors full oxidative
    [Show full text]
  • Oxidative Addition of Polar Reagents
    OXIDATIVE ADDITION OF POLAR REAGENTS Organometallic chemistry has vastly expanded the practicing organic chemist’s notion of what makes a good nucleophile or electrophile. Pre-cross-coupling, for example, using unactivated aryl halides as electrophiles was largely a pipe dream (or possible only under certain specific circumstances). Enter the oxidative addition of polarized bonds: all of a sudden, compounds like bromobenzene started looking a lot more attractive as starting materials. Cross-coupling reactionsinvolving sp2- and sp-hybridized C–X bonds beautifully complement the “classical” substitution reactions at sp3electrophilic carbons. Oxidative addition of the C–X bond is the step that kicks off the magic of these methods. In this post, we’ll explore the mechanisms and favorability trends of oxidative additions of polar reagents. The landscape of mechanistic possibilities for polarized bonds is much more rich than in the non-polar case—concerted, ionic, and radical mechanisms have all been observed. Concerted Mechanisms 2 Oxidative additions of aryl and alkenyl Csp –X bonds, where X is a halogen or sulfonate, proceed through concertedmechanisms analogous to oxidative additions of dihydrogen. Reactions of N–H and O–H bonds in amines, alcohols, and water also appear to be concerted. A π complex involving η2-coordination is an intermediate in the mechanism of insertion into aryl halides at least, and probably vinyl halides too. As two open coordination sites are necessary for concerted oxidative addition, loss of a ligand from a saturated metal complex commonly precedes the actual oxidative addition event. Concerted oxidative addition of aryl halides and sulfonates. Trends in the reactivity of alkyl and aryl (pseudo)halides toward oxidative addition are some of the most famous in organometallic chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • 18- Electron Rule. 18 Electron Rule Cont’D Recall That for MAIN GROUP Elements the Octet Rule Is Used to Predict the Formulae of Covalent Compounds
    18- Electron Rule. 18 Electron Rule cont’d Recall that for MAIN GROUP elements the octet rule is used to predict the formulae of covalent compounds. Example 1. This rule assumes that the central atom in a compound will make bonds such Oxidation state of Co? [Co(NH ) ]+3 that the total number of electrons around the central atom is 8. THIS IS THE 3 6 Electron configuration of Co? MAXIMUM CAPACITY OF THE s and p orbitals. Electrons from Ligands? Electrons from Co? This rule is only valid for Total electrons? Period 2 nonmetallic elements. Example 2. Oxidation state of Fe? The 18-electron Rule is based on a similar concept. Electron configuration of Fe? [Fe(CO) ] The central TM can accommodate electrons in the s, p, and d orbitals. 5 Electrons from Ligands? Electrons from Fe? s (2) , p (6) , and d (10) = maximum of 18 Total electrons? This means that a TM can add electrons from Lewis Bases (or ligands) in What can the EAN rule tell us about [Fe(CO)5]? addition to its valence electrons to a total of 18. It can’t occur…… 20-electron complex. This is also known Effective Atomic Number (EAN) Rule Note that it only applies to metals with low oxidation states. 1 2 Sandwich Compounds Obeying EAN EAN Summary 1. Works well only for d-block metals. It does not apply to f-block Let’s draw some structures and see some new ligands. metals. 2. Works best for compounds with TMs of low ox. state. Each of these ligands is π-bonded above and below the metal center.
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript J Am Chem Soc
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript J Am Chem Soc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 August 29. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2012 August 29; 134(34): 14232–14237. doi:10.1021/ja306323x. A Mild, Palladium-Catalyzed Method for the Dehydrohalogenation of Alkyl Bromides: Synthetic and Mechanistic Studies Alex C. Bissember†,‡, Anna Levina†, and Gregory C. Fu†,‡ †Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States ‡Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States Abstract We have exploited a typically undesired elementary step in cross-coupling reactions, β-hydride elimination, to accomplish palladium-catalyzed dehydrohalogenations of alkyl bromides to form terminal olefins. We have applied this method, which proceeds in excellent yield at room temperature in the presence of a variety of functional groups, to a formal total synthesis of (R)- mevalonolactone. Our mechanistic studies establish that the rate-determining step can vary with the structure of the alkyl bromide, and, most significantly, that L2PdHBr (L=phosphine), an often- invoked intermediate in palladium-catalyzed processes such as the Heck reaction, is not an intermediate in the active catalytic cycle. INTRODUCTION The elimination of HX to form an olefin is one of the most elementary transformations in organic chemistry (eq 1).1,2 However, harsh conditions, such as the use of a strong Brønsted acid/base or a high temperature (which can lead to poor functional-group compatibility and to olefin isomerization) are often necessary for this seemingly straightforward process.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruthenium Olefin Metathesis Catalysts
    Ruthenium Olefin Metathesis Catalysts: Tuning of the Ligand Environment Ruthenium olefine metathese katalysatoren: Optimalisatie van de ligandsfeer Nele Ledoux Promotor: Prof. Dr. F. Verpoort Proefschrift ingediend tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Wetenschappen: Scheikunde Vakgroep Anorganische en Fysische Chemie Vakgroepvoorzitter: Prof. Dr. S. Hoste Faculteit Wetenschappen 2007 ii Members of the Dissertation Committee: Prof. Dr. F. Verpoort Prof. Dr. Ir. C. Stevens Dr. V. Dragutan Dr. R. Drozdzak Dr. R. Winde Prof. Dr. Ir. D. Devos Prof. Dr. J. Van der Eycken Prof. Dr. P. Van Der Voort Prof. Dr. K. Strubbe This research was funded by the Fund for Scien- tific Research - Flanders (F.W.O.-Vlaanderen). Acknowledgments This dissertation is the final product of an educative and fascinating journey, which involved many contributors. First of all, I wish to express my gratitude to the people with whom I learned how to do research. There is my promotor Prof. Dr. Francis Verpoort who gave me the opportunity to join his ’Catalysis group’ and ensured the necessary funding. I’m especially grateful for his confidence and indulgence. In addition, I have been extremely lucky to work with several nice colleagues. Thank you, Thank you (= double thank you ♥) to Bart who helped me conquer many small and big difficulties, and by doing so, contributed a lot to the results reported here. Special thanks to Hans for many funny moments and support over the years. Of course, my acknowledgments also go to the other boys: Carl, Stijn, David, Jeroen, Prof. Dr. Pascal Van Der Voort and not to forget Siegfried, Steven, and Mike for the pleasant working atmosphere and supportive chats.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 2--2016
    Chem 462 Lecture 2--2016 z [MLnXm] Classification of Ligands Metal Oxidation States Electron Counting Overview of Transition Metal Complexes 1.The coordinate covalent or dative bond applies in L:M 2.Lewis bases are called LIGANDS—all serve as σ-donors some are π-donors as well, and some are π-acceptors 3. Specific coordination number and geometries depend on metal and number of d-electrons 4. HSAB theory useful z [MLnXm] a) Hard bases stabilize high oxidation states b) Soft bases stabilize low oxidation states Classification of Ligands: The L, X, Z Approach Malcolm Green : The CBC Method (or Covalent Bond Classification) used extensively in organometallic chemistry. L ligands are derived from charge-neutral precursors: NH3, amines, N-heterocycles such as pyridine, PR3, CO, alkenes etc. X ligands are derived from anionic precursors: halides, hydroxide, alkoxide alkyls—species that are one-electron neutral ligands, but two electron 4- donors as anionic ligands. EDTA is classified as an L2X4 ligand, features four anions and two neutral donor sites. C5H5 is classified an L2X ligand. Z ligands are RARE. They accept two electrons from the metal center. They donate none. The “ligand” is a Lewis Acid that accepts electrons rather than the Lewis Bases of the X and L ligands that donate electrons. Here, z = charge on the complex unit. z [MLnXm] octahedral Square pyramidal Trigonal bi- pyramidal Tetrahedral Range of Oxidation States in 3d Transition Metals Summary: Classification of Ligands, II: type of donor orbitals involved: σ; σ + π; σ + π*; π+ π* Ligands, Classification I, continued Electron Counting and the famous Sidgewick epiphany Two methods: 1) Neutral ligand (no ligand carries a charge—therefore X ligands are one electron donors, L ligands are 2 electron donors.) 2) Both L and X are 2-electron donor ligand (ionic method) Applying the Ionic or 2-electron donor method: Oxidative addition of H2 to chloro carbonyl bis triphenylphosphine Iridium(I) yields Chloro-dihydrido-carbonyl bis-triphenylphosphine Iridium(III).
    [Show full text]
  • Carbometallation Chemistry
    Carbometallation chemistry Edited by Ilan Marek Generated on 01 October 2021, 10:03 Imprint Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry www.bjoc.org ISSN 1860-5397 Email: [email protected] The Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry is published by the Beilstein-Institut zur Förderung der Chemischen Wissenschaften. This thematic issue, published in the Beilstein Beilstein-Institut zur Förderung der Journal of Organic Chemistry, is copyright the Chemischen Wissenschaften Beilstein-Institut zur Förderung der Chemischen Trakehner Straße 7–9 Wissenschaften. The copyright of the individual 60487 Frankfurt am Main articles in this document is the property of their Germany respective authors, subject to a Creative www.beilstein-institut.de Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license. Carbometallation chemistry Ilan Marek Editorial Open Access Address: Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 234–235. Schulich Faculty of Chemistry, Technion-Israel Institute of doi:10.3762/bjoc.9.27 Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel Received: 24 January 2013 Email: Accepted: 29 January 2013 Ilan Marek - [email protected] Published: 04 February 2013 This article is part of the Thematic Series "Carbometallation chemistry". Keywords: carbometallation Guest Editor: I. Marek © 2013 Marek; licensee Beilstein-Institut. License and terms: see end of document. Following the pioneering Ziegler addition of nucleophiles to in the 1,2-bisalkylation of nonactivated alkenes! In this nonactivated unsaturated carbon–carbon bonds, the controlled Thematic Series, you will find
    [Show full text]
  • Some Problems in the Oxidative Addition and Binding of an Ethylene to a Transition-Metal Center
    Organometallics 1986,5, 1841-1851 1841 Some Problems in the Oxidative Addition and Binding of an Ethylene to a Transition-Metal Center JBr8me Silvestre,laqbMaria Jos6 Calhorda,'a*CRoald Hoffmann, laPage 0. Stoutland,ld and Robert G. Bergmanld Department of Chemistry and MaterriaL Sciences Center, Cornel1 University, Zthaca. New York 14853, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, and Materials and Molecular Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratoty, Berkeley, California 94720 Received January 9, 1986 Molecular orbital calculations have been carried out on the potential energy surface of the system CpIrL(C2H4)(L = phosphine). The geometrical and electronic characteristics of the $-olefin and vinyl hydride complexes are examined in some detail. The olefin complex is found to have a slightly lower energy than the vinyl hydride, in agreement with experiment. Different routes are studied which lead to the oxidative addition product from the 16-electron fragment and an ethylene. It is found that an M-H-C linear approach is favored, coupled with a very specific orientation of the ethylenic T system. This results from both electronic and steric requirements. A relatively small barrier is computed for the process,-and the experimentally observed competition between vinyl hydride formation and direct ethylene addition is discussed. Calculations have been performed to ascertain the existence of a separate transition state taking the v2-bound olefin into the vinyl hydride. The computations suggest the existence of two distinct transition states. The influence of substituents and particularly steric effects is analyzed. It is shown how an increase in the size of the ligand affects the shape of the surface and more specifically narrows the energy channels governing conformational changes as well as product formation.
    [Show full text]
  • E Organometallic Rections 1: Reactions at the Metal
    E Organometallic Rections 1: Reactions at the Metal Three major classes of reactions: 1 Ligand Substitution . associative (cf. SN2) . dissociative (cf. SN1) . interchange (not dealt with in this course) 2 Oxidative-addition . concerted . step-wise (nucleophilic) . radical 3 Reductive-elimination . concerted cis-elimination . binuclear elimination 1 Ligand Substitution (especially in square planar complexes) Ligand directing effects: some ligands preferentially direct substitution to the site trans to themselves (trans effect). The trans effect of a ligand may be due to: a) destabilization of the trans M-L bond in the ground state (also called the trans influence) Fig. 7-2 text (middle, next page) - - - •strong-donors (H ,PR3,I,Me etc.) weaken the M-L bond trans to themselves • observable by IR (M-L), X-ray (M-L bond length) and NMR (reduced 1 JM-L values) From Organometallic Chemistry by Spessard and Miessler b) stabilization of the transition state (true trans effect) Fig 7-2 text (right) + . strong -acceptors (eg.CO,C2H4,NO etc.) remove electron density in the equatorial plane of 5-coordinate tbp transition states thus decreasing electrostatic repulsion Combining - and -effects gives the observed trans effect order: - - - - - - - - - - CO, CN ,C2H4 > PR3,H > Me > Ph >NO2 ,I,SCN >Br >Cl >py,NH3,OH,H2O + - Eg. trans-Pt(PEt3)2Cl(L) + py trans-Pt(PEt3)2(py)(L) + Cl Lk(M-1s-1) - H , PEt3 4 Ph- 10-2 Cl- 10-4 Associative (A) substitution . most common for sq. planar 16 e- species . usually proceeds with retention of configuration . rate law is 1st order in complex and incoming ligand Y NB: T is a stronger trans labilizing ligand than A or X .
    [Show full text]
  • Roles of Base in the Pd-Catalyzed Annulative Chlorophenylene Dimerization
    !"#$%&"'&()%$&*+&,-$&./01),)#23$/&4++5#),*6$& 1-#"7"8-$+2#$+$&9*:$7*3),*"+& Li-Ping Xu,a,b Brandon E. Haines,c Manjaly J. Ajitha,a Kei Murakami,d Kenichiro Itami,*,d and Djamaladdin G. Musaev*,a a Cherry L. Emerson Center for Scientific Computation, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA b School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255000, China c Westmont College, Department of Chemistry, Santa Barbara CA, 93108, USA d Institute of Transformative Bio-Molecules (WPI-ITbM) and Graduate School of Science, and JST-ERATO, Itami Molecular Nanocarbon Project, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464- 8602, Japan KEYWORDS: Palladium catalyst, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, C-H functionalization, DFT, base effect ABSTRACT By using computation, the detailed mechanism of the Pd-catalyzed annulative chlorophenylene dimerization has been elucidated and the roles of the base have been identified. It is shown that the initial steps of this reaction are the active catalyst formation and the first C–Cl bond activation proceeds via the “base-assisted oxidative addition” mechanism. Overall, these steps of the reaction proceed via 16.2 kcal/mol free energy barrier for the C–Cl bond activation and are highly exergonic. Importantly, the base directly participates in the C–Cl bond cleavage introduces a mechanistic switch of the Pd(0)/Pd(II) oxidation and makes the reaction more exergonic. The following steps of the reaction are palladacycle and Pd-aryne formations, among which the palladacycle formation is found to be favorable: it proceeds with a moderate C–H activation barrier and is slightly exergonic. Although the Pd-aryne formation requires a slightly lower energy barrier, it is highly endergonic: therefore, the participation of the Pd-aryne complex, or its derivatives, in the Pd- catalyzed annulative chlorophenylene dimerization in the presence of Cs2CO3 seems to be unlikely.
    [Show full text]
  • Metal Catalyzed Outer Sphere Alkylations of Unactivated Olefins and Alkynes
    Metal Catalyzed Outer Sphere Alkylations of Unactivated Olefins and Alkynes Stephen Goble Organic Super-Group Meeting Literature Presentation October 6, 2004 1 Outline I. Background • Introduction to Carbometallation • “Inner Sphere” vs. “Outer Sphere” • Review of Seminal Work II. Catalytic Palladium Systems III. Catalytic Platinum Systems IV. Catalytic Gold Systems 2 I. Background: Carbometallation is the formal addition of a metal and a carbon atom across a double bond. • Cis addition would involve olefin insertion in to an σ-alkyl-metal species. This is an “Inner Coordination Sphere” process. cis addition [M] [M] R olefin insertion R • The alkyl-metal species could arise from: 1. Oxidative addition of the metal to an electrophile. 2. Transmetallation of a nucleophile to the metal. 3. Direct nucleophilic attack on the palladium. • Trans addition would involve an “Outer Coordination Sphere” nucleophilic attack on the metal-olefin coordination complex. trans addition [M] [M] R- R 3 First Example: Carbopalladation of an Olefin Tsuji, J. and Takahashi, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965. 87(14), 3275-3276. [Pd] O O RO2C CO R PdCl2 RO OR 2 Na2CO3 [Pd] Cl • Amino and Oxo-palladations (i.e. Wacker Process) were previously known and have since been much more widely studied. • No distinction between cis and trans nucleophilic addition made. 4 Carbopalladation on Styrene: Different Modes of Attack Proposed different modes of attack based on different observed products with MeLi vs. Na-Malonate: Murahashi, S. et. al. J. Org. Chem. 1977. 42 (17), 2870-2874. Nucleophilic Attack on Pd Olefin Insertion B-Hydride Elimination CH3Li [Pd] [Pd] CH3 PdX2 CH3 [Pd]-H Inner Sphere Mechanism Palladium Coordination Nucleophilic Attack B-hydride elimination CO R CO2R 2 NaCH(CO2R) CO R [Pd] CO2R 2 PdX2 [Pd] [Pd]-H • Outer Sphere attack usually occurs at the more substituted carbon - more stabilization of + + charge (In intermolecular processes).
    [Show full text]
  • Catalytic Addition of C–
    Chem Soc Rev View Article Online REVIEW ARTICLE View Journal | View Issue Catalytic addition of C–H bonds across C–C unsaturated systems promoted by iridium(I) and Cite this: Chem. Soc. Rev., 2020, 49,7378 its group IX congeners a a ab David F. Ferna´ndez, † Jose´ L. Mascaren˜as * and Fernando Lo´pez * Transition metal-catalyzed hydrocarbonations of unsaturated substrates have emerged as powerful synthetic tools for increasing molecular complexity in an atom-economical manner. Although this field was traditionally dominated by low valent rhodium and ruthenium catalysts, in recent years, there have been many reports based on the use of iridium complexes. In many cases, these reactions have a different course from those of their rhodium homologs, and even allow performing otherwise inviable transformations. In this review we aim to provide an informative journey, from the early pioneering examples in the field, most of them based on other metals than iridium, to the most recent transformations catalyzed by designed Ir(I) complexes. The review is organized by the type of C–H bond Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. Received 20th May 2020 that is activated (with C sp2,sporsp3), as well as by the C–C unsaturated partner that is used as a DOI: 10.1039/d0cs00359j hydrocarbonation partner (alkyne, allene or alkene). Importantly, we discuss the mechanistic foundations of the methods highlighting the differences from those previously proposed for processes catalyzed by rsc.li/chem-soc-rev related metals, particularly those of the same group (Co and Rh). a Centro Singular de Investigacio´nenQuı´mica Biolo´xica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS) and Departamento de Quı´mica Orga´nica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
    [Show full text]