DOCSLIB.ORG

Malaga to Ellenbrook Rail Works

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Malaga to Ellenbrook Rail Works Malaga to Ellenbrook Rail Works Referral Supplementary Document December 2019 For more information contact Public Transport Authority Public Transport Centre, West Parade, Perth WA 6000 PO Box 8125, Perth Business Centre, Perth WA 6849 Telephone: (08) 9326 2000 Email: [email protected] www.pta.wa.gov.au Document Information Document Name Prepared by C Baxter Reviewed by M Ludlow Prepared for Environmental Protection Authority Version / Revision 1A Date 24/12/2019 Distribution List Name Position Organisation Anthony Sutton Executive Director EPA Services Hans Jacob Manager Infrastructure Assessment EPA Services Dehlia Goundrey Manager Strategic Assessment EPA Services Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 9 Proposal Title: Malaga to Ellenbrook Rail Works ........................................................................ 9 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 20 1.1. Purpose and scope ......................................................................................................... 20 1.2. Proponent ....................................................................................................................... 20 1.3. Environmental Impact Assessment Process ................................................................... 20 1.3.1. Environmental Protection Act 1986 .......................................................................... 20 1.3.2. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ............................. 20 1.3.3. Other approvals and legislation ............................................................................... 21 2. The Proposal ........................................................................................................................ 23 2.1. Background .................................................................................................................... 23 2.1.1. Land use planning and zoning ................................................................................. 23 2.1.2. Sustainability ........................................................................................................... 24 2.1.3. Project Alternatives .................................................................................................. 24 2.2. Proposal description ....................................................................................................... 30 2.2.1. Development Envelope ............................................................................................ 32 2.2.2. Railway tracks and infrastructure ............................................................................. 32 2.2.3. Stations ................................................................................................................... 32 2.2.4. Bridges and underpasses ........................................................................................ 33 2.2.5. Temporary construction areas ................................................................................. 33 2.2.6. Malaga Station Precinct ........................................................................................... 34 2.2.7. Future rail stabling facility ........................................................................................ 34 2.2.8. Stormwater Drainage Infrastructure ......................................................................... 34 2.2.9. Dewatering and groundwater abstraction requirements ........................................... 34 2.3. Local and regional context .............................................................................................. 39 2.3.1. Geology and soils .................................................................................................... 39 2.3.2. Hydrology ................................................................................................................ 39 3. Stakeholder consultation .................................................................................................... 41 3.1. Key stakeholders ............................................................................................................ 41 3.2. Stakeholder engagement process .................................................................................. 42 3.3. Stakeholder consultation................................................................................................. 42 4. Environmental principles .................................................................................................... 48 3 4.1. Environmental Factors .................................................................................................... 50 5. Flora and vegetation ............................................................................................................ 54 5.1. EPA objective ................................................................................................................. 54 5.2. Policy and guidance ........................................................................................................ 54 5.3. Receiving environment ................................................................................................... 54 5.3.1. Surveys and studies ................................................................................................ 54 5.3.2. Survey type and coverage ....................................................................................... 56 5.3.3. Interim Biogeographical Regionalisation of Australia ............................................... 58 5.3.4. Geology, landform and soils .................................................................................... 58 5.3.5. DBCA managed lands and reserves ........................................................................ 58 5.3.6. Bush Forever Sites .................................................................................................. 58 5.3.7. Wetlands ................................................................................................................. 59 5.3.8. Regional ecological linkages .................................................................................... 60 5.3.9. Vegetation associations ........................................................................................... 63 5.3.10. Heddle Vegetation complexes .............................................................................. 64 5.3.11. Vegetation types .................................................................................................. 65 5.3.12. Vegetation condition ............................................................................................. 69 5.3.13. Threatened and priority ecological communities ................................................... 76 5.3.14. Other conservation significant ecological communities ......................................... 76 5.3.15. Conservation significant flora ............................................................................... 76 5.3.16. Dieback ................................................................................................................ 83 5.3.17. Weeds .................................................................................................................. 83 5.4. Assessment of impacts to Flora and Vegetation ............................................................. 88 5.5. Further investigations ..................................................................................................... 91 5.6. Predicted outcome .......................................................................................................... 91 6. Terrestrial Fauna .................................................................................................................. 92 6.1. EPA objective ................................................................................................................. 92 6.2. Policy and guidance ........................................................................................................ 92 6.3. Receiving environment ................................................................................................... 92 6.3.1. Surveys and studies ................................................................................................ 92 6.3.2. Fauna habitat........................................................................................................... 97 6.3.3. Conservation significant fauna ............................................................................... 104 6.3.4. Subterranean fauna ............................................................................................... 113 6.3.5. Short-range endemics ........................................................................................... 113 6.3.6. Black Cockatoo Species ........................................................................................ 113 Public Transport Authority Malaga to Ellenbrook Rail Works 4 6.3.7. Migratory species .................................................................................................. 119 6.3.8. Mammals ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Offsets Paper: On-Ground Management Offset at Whiteman Park Malaga to Ellenbrook Rail Works Proposal September 2020
    Offsets Paper: On-ground management offset at Whiteman Park Malaga to Ellenbrook Rail Works Proposal September 2020 Document Information Version Prepared Description/Changes Reviewed Authorised Provided Version by made by for release to Date by A B. Lockley First Draft J. Morrell J. Morrell DWER Sept 2020 For more information contact Public Transport Authority Public Transport Centre, West Parade, Perth WA 6000 PO Box 8125, Perth Business Centre, Perth WA 6849 Telephone: (08) 9326 2000 Email: [email protected] www.pta.wa.gov.au Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1. Malaga to Ellenbrook Rail Works Proposal ....................................................................... 4 1.2. Regulatory context ............................................................................................................ 4 1.3. Regulator assessment of the Proposal ............................................................................. 4 1.4. Objective .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.5. Stakeholder Consultation .................................................................................................. 5 1.6. Assumptions and limitations ............................................................................................. 5 2. Significant Residual Environmental Impacts ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Review Document Part 6 (PDF, 355.54
    Significance Criteria Comment Result in an invasive species The Proposed Action is unlikely to result in the establishment of harmful that is harmful to the migratory invasive species. species becoming established Horse Swamp comprises Melaleuca rhaphiophylla over introduced in an area of important habitat pasture herbs and grasses. The wetland is already considered degraded. for the migratory species The Proposed Action will not result in further degradation of this wetland. Seriously disrupt the lifecycle (breeding, feeding, migration or resting behaviour) of an The Proposed Action is unlikely to disrupt the lifecycle of the Glossy Ibis. ecologically significant The Proposed Action is not within Glossy Ibis breeding habitat. proportion of the population of a migratory species. Conclusion The Proposed Action is considered unlikely to have a significant impact on the Glossy Ibis. Potential impacts to MNES The potential impacts on MNES are described in Table 99. Table 99: Potential impacts on MNES Proposed Impact Activities Potential Impacts Action Stage Type Construction Direct Clearing of native vegetation. Permanent loss of: · 10.05 ha of Banksia Woodland of the Swan Coastal Plain TEC. · 81.4 ha of Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo foraging habitat including 54.1 ha quality habitat. · 68.1 ha of Forest Red-tailed Black Cockatoo foraging habitat including 38.0 ha of quality habitat. · 81.4 ha of Baudin’s Black Cockatoo foraging habitat including 42.8 ha of quality habitat. · Removal of 423 Black Cockatoo potential breeding trees including 33 trees with hollows, none of which were assessed as suitable for Black Cockatoo nesting. · Injury/mortality of Black Cockatoos from vehicle strike.
    [Show full text]
  • FAST FACTS the Future Is Brabham
    Exciting new community The future is Brabham in an established area with existing schools, shops and restaurants on your We’re creating a connected community that will feel vibrant and fresh while doorstep. retaining the soul and character of the natural and cultural heritage of the area. Neighbourhoods that will encourage people to venture outside 1.5km to Swan Valley through intelligent street design and a network of connected walkways & 20km to Perth CBD. that facilitate the buzz of daily interaction. We are reimagining the notion of what a home can be for everyone. Drawing the best from the past and present to create a better future. Awarded a 6 star ‘Green Star’ Brabham is your chance to be part of a diverse, inclusive and forward- certification by the Green Building thinking community where you’ll always be close to everything you need. 6 FAST FACTS Council of Australia. SIZE AND LOCATION PARKS AND RESERVES SCHOOLS 220ha master-planned community Brabham will provide a range of public Two future primary schools and a Located 20km north-east of Perth CBD in open spaces and natural assets such highschool the City of Swan as St Leonard’s creek, with all parks Brabham Primary School opening in 2021, Within 1.5km of the Swan Valley wine region designed to be within a 400m walking just 250m from the estate Upon completion, Brabham will boast distance for all residents Hop and a skip to local schools approximately 3,300 dwellings delivering Brabham is also adjacent to Whiteman – 3km to Riverlands Montessori School an affordable and integrated
    [Show full text]
  • Perth–Darwin National Highway (Swan Valley Section)
    Final Public Environment Report Perth–Darwin National Highway (Swan Valley Section) FEBRUARY 2016 | PART A: DRAFT PUBLIC ENVIRONMENT REPORT Public Environmental Review Perth-Darwin National Highway (Swan Valley Section) SEPTEMBER 2015 | VOLUME I: MAIN TEXT This document is a Public Environmental Review under the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) and a draft Public Environment Report under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) proposes to construct a new section of the Perth–Darwin National Highway (hereafter referred to as ‘the proposal’) between Malaga and Muchea, Western Australia. The proposal is 38 km of new dual carriageway highway to the west of the Swan Valley and will connect the intersection of Tonkin Highway and Reid Highway in the south with Great Northern Highway and Brand Highway in the north. The proposal is the culmination of decades of planning for the southern terminus of the Perth–Darwin National Highway (PDNH), a key 4,000 km road transport route linking Perth with northern Western Australia and the Northern Territory. This document is a Public Environmental Review (PER) required under Western Australian environmental legislation and a Public Environment Report required under Commonwealth environmental legislation. It will be used by Western Australian and Commonwealth agencies as the basis for environmental assessment of the proposal. Background and Context The current PDNH alignment follows Great Northern Highway through the Swan Valley between Roe Highway and Muchea. However, urban growth and increased tourism between Midland and Bindoon has generated additional traffic on roads in and around the Swan Valley, including on Great Northern Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Henley Brook Local Structure Plan
    HENLEY BROOK LOCAL STRUCTURE PLAN VARIOUS LOTS ON STARFLOWER ROAD, PARK STREET, HENLEY STREET, BROOKLANDS DRIVE, DIANE PLACE, ANDREA DRIVE, PETRANA PLACE, LOSINO BOULEVARD AND ASTURIAN DRIVE, HENLEY BROOK CITY OF SWAN NOVEMBER 2020 Prepared for: Progress Developments (on behalf of Little Property (WA) Pty Ltd) Prepared by: Burgess Design Group A: 101 Edward Street, Perth WA 6000 P: PO Box 8779, Perth Business Centre, WA 6849 T: (08) 9328 6411 E: [email protected] Project planner Mark Szabo Job code PRO BRO File reference 201111RLGA_Henley Brook LSP v3 (TRACKED CHANGES) Revision: Date: Description: Author: Reviewer: 0 28/12/19 First issue Mitch Bisby Mark Szabo/Jon Burgess 1 07/02/19 LWMS updates Mitch Bisby Mark Szabo 2 26/07/19 Pre-lodgement updates Mitch Bisby Mark Szabo 3 11/11/20 WAPC modifications Mitch Bisby Mark Szabo ENDORSEMENT OF THE HENLEY BROOK LOCAL STRUCTURE PLAN This structure plan is prepared under the provisions of the City of Swan Local Planning Scheme No. 17. IT 15 CERTIFIED THAT THIS STRUCTURE PLAN WAS APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLANNING COMMISSION ON: 12 February 2021 Date Signed for and on behalfi,,' of4ptern Australian Planning Commission: srW ry=i-. An officer of the Commission duly authorised by the Commission pursuant to section '16 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 for that purpose, in the presence of: Witness 12 February 2021 Date 12 February 2031 Date of Expiry EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Structure Plan applies to land generally bound by Starflower Road to the west, Gnangara Road to the north, Morgan Fields Estate and the planned Henley Brook Avenue to the east, and Park Street to the south, being the land located within the inner edge of the line denoting the structure plan boundary on the Structure Plan Map.
    [Show full text]
  • Morley-Ellenbrook Line PROJECT DEFINITION PLAN JUNE 2020 Contents
    Morley-Ellenbrook Line PROJECT DEFINITION PLAN JUNE 2020 Contents FOREWORD 1 METRONET PROJECT SNAPSHOT 2 partner agencies Foreword EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Strategic Need 4 The Project 4 Project Objectives 6 The Morley-Ellenbrook Line has been talked about for decades – the Delivery Strategies 6 McGowan Government is getting on with the job and delivering this vital Precinct Delivery Strategy 6 piece of infrastructure. Timing 6 Department of Perth’s north-eastern suburbs are one of Australia’s fastest growing areas, 1 METRONET OVERVIEW 8 Transport with the population expected to almost double to more than 415,000 by 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW 10 2031, compared to 2006 levels. 2.1 Planning Context 11 By 2031, it is estimated the rail line will take more than 10,000 car trips off 2.2 Transport Context 12 roads in the north-eastern suburbs each day. 2.3 The Project 12 Public Transport Authority For passengers travelling direct from Ellenbrook to the CBD, the trip on the 2.4 Land Use Integration 13 Morley-Ellenbrook Line will take about 30 minutes - half the current travel 3 STRATEGIC JUSTIFICATION 16 time for local residents using public transport. 3.1 Supporting Economic, Metropolitan and Stations will be built at Ellenbrook, Whiteman Park, Malaga, Noranda and Regional Growth and Addressing Service Gaps 18 Morley, with a future station to be developed at Bennett Springs East, when 4 ROUTE CORRIDOR 20 planning in the area is finalised. 4.1 Route and Station Locations 20 More than 3000 local jobs will be created over the life of the project, as well 4.2 Environmental Considerations 20 as opportunities for local businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Site Investigation.Pdf
    Preliminary Site Investigation Part 2 M Eco Logical Australia METRONET Morley-Ellenbrook Line Preliminary Site Investigation Part 2: Malaga to Ellenbrook Section MEL-MNO-COFF-EN-RPT-0011 04 May 2020 This page has been left intentionally blank METRONET Morley-Ellenbrook Line Preliminary Site Investigation Part 2: Malaga to Ellenbrook Section Prepared for Eco Logical Australia Prepared by Coffey Services Australia Pty Ltd Level 1, Bishops See, 235 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 Australia t: +61 8 6218 2100 f: +61 8 6218 2222 ABN 55 139 460 521 04 May 2020 MEL-MNO-COFF-EN-RPT-0011 754-PEREN233882 Quality information Revision history Revision Description Date Originator Reviewer Approver Draft A Draft 07/02/2020 Geri Matthew Pethebridge/Nick Chenery Taylor Draft B Draft for client review 13/02/2020 Nick Taylor Matthew Matthew Chenery Chenery Draft C Draft for client review 17/02/2020 Nick Taylor Cameron Cameron Baldock Baldock Rev0 Issued for Use 20/04/2020 Nick Taylor Cameron Cameron Baldock Baldock Rev1 Issued for Use 04/05/2020 Nick Taylor Cameron Cameron Baldock Baldock Distribution Report Status No. of copies Format Distributed to Date Rev0 1 PDF METRONET and ELA 20/04/2020 Rev1 1 PDF METRONET and ELA 04/05/2020 Coffey Services Australia Pty Ltd i ABN 55 139 460 521 Executive Summary Coffey Services Pty Ltd (Coffey) were engaged by EcoLogical Australia (ELA) to undertake a Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) for contamination along the alignment Development Envelope (DE) of the Morley-Ellenbrook Line (MEL). The development of the MEL project is being led by the METRONET office, while the Public Transport Authority (PTA) of Western Australia is the projects formal proponent.
    [Show full text]
  • Northlink WA (UPDATED OCTOBER 2015)
    MAIN ROADS WESTERN AUSTRALIA PROJECT UPDATE APRIL 2015 NorthLink WA (UPDATED OCTOBER 2015) LONG TERM VISION FOR NORTHLINK WA FINALISED The long term vision for NorthLink WA Local access – community input has Tonkin Grade Separations will has now been nalised. It has been assisted the team in identifying local provide new interchanges on Tonkin designed to ensure exibility to cater area access issues and developing Highway at Collier Road and Morley for the trafc volumes associated with solutions. Drive, a yover at Benara Road, a future Perth population of 3.5 million, and the upgrading of this length of including a forecast large increase in Noise and visual amenity – this has Tonkin Highway. freight trafc. been a key area of interest for local residents. Extensive noise monitoring The long term vision will be used as the and modeling has been undertaken to basis for preparing the projects to be identify the impact of the projects. The constructed by 2019. options for mitigating noise and visual $1.12b NorthLink WA follows the route identied impacts are being considered and the This is the combined value in previous planning studies. Main Roads team will continue to involve community completed these planning studies, which reference groups in this important work. of NorthLink WA; funded included wide ranging consultation Road safety – the types of interchange by both the Australian with landowners, residents and other proposed will reduce the risk of serious ($894 million) and State stakeholders, in 2013. The current project crashes. The long term vision also development work has rened this route ($223 million) Governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Morley-Ellenbrook Line Industry Briefing Brochure
    Morley-Ellenbrook Line Industry Briefing December 2019 E R N V M E O N G T E O H F T Public Transport FUNDING PARTNERS: LEAD DELIVERY AGENCY: W Authority A E I S L T A E R R N A U S T The State Government and the METRONET office acknowledges the People of the Noongar Nation as the Traditional Custodians of the land and waters on which METRONET program of projects is located. We pay our respect to their Elders, both past and present METRONET and thank them for their continuing connection to country, culture partner agencies and community. E R N V M E O N G T E O H F T PublicDepartment Transpor of t W Authority A Transport E I S L T A E R R N A U S T E R N V M E O N G T E O H F T Public Transport W Authority A Contents E I S L T A E R R N A U S T INTRODUCTION 3 MORLEY-ELLENBROOK LINE 4 PROCUREMENT APPROACH 8 ENVIRONMENTAL, HERITAGE AND COMMUNITY CONSIDERATIONS 10 POLICIES AND STRATEGIES 12 Sustainability 12 Aboriginal Engagement 12 Public Art 13 Other State Government strategies 13 WHAT’S NEXT 14 Yanchep Yanchep Rail Extension 14.5km extension with stations at Alkimos, Eglinton and Yanchep Butler Claremont Station Upgrade Upgrades to service the Introduction Forrestfield-Airport Link Ashby Morley-Ellenbrook Line 21km line with stations at Morley, Noranda, Malaga, Whiteman Park Joondalup and Ellenbrook Ellenbrook Midland Station Project and Bellevue extension The new station, in a new location, to better integrate and connect the area Stirling Morley Level crossing removal on Armadale and Midland lines METRONET will create a world-class Removing up to eight of Perth’s 31 level crossings public transport system that will Perth transform Perth and drive job growth Forrestfield-Airport Link 8.5km line with stations at Redcliffe, throughout local industries.
    [Show full text]