DOCSLIB.ORG

Terminal Evaluation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terminal Evaluation Report Terminal Evaluation Report UNDP-GEF Project: Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity-compatible livelihoods in and around PAs GEF Project ID: 4584 UNDP Project ID: 4855 Country: Kazakhstan Region: Europe and Central Asia Focal Areas (GEF-5): Biodiversity Land Degradation GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Executing Agencies: Forestry and Wildlife Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture Date Version 31 July 2018 01 First draft 30 September 02 Final Terminal Evaluation Report 2018 Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity-compatible livelihoods in and around PAs UNDP PIMS ID: 4855; GEF Project ID: 4584 Opening Page PROJECT DETAILS: Project Name: Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity- compatible livelihoods in and around PAs Project ID: GEF Project ID: 4584 UNDP PIMS ID: 4855 Country: Kazakhstan Region: Europe and Central Asia Focal Area: Biodiversity Funding Source: GEF Trust Fund Strategic Programs: GEF-5 Biodiversity Strategy, Objective 1: Improve Sustainability of Protected Area Systems GEF-5 Land Degradation Strategy, Objective 3: Integrated Landscapes: Reduce Pressures on natural resources from competing land uses in wider landscape GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme Implementation Modality: National Implementation Modality (NIM) Executing Agency: Forestry and Wildlife Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture Responsible Partners: N/A FINANCIALS AT PROJECT APPROVAL: Project Preparation Grant: USD 120,500 GEF Project Grant: USD 4,364,000 Cofinancing Total: USD 19,179,293 GEF Agency Fees: USD 436,400 Total Cost: USD 26,663,793 PROJECT TIMELINE: Received by GEF: 05 August 2011 Preparation Grant Approved: 27 October 2011 Concept Approved: 01 November 2011 Project Approved for 08 July 2013 Implementation: State Date: 3 September 2013 Project Closed (planned): 31 August 2018 TERMINAL EVALUATION DETAILS: TE Timeframe: May-July 2018 Evaluator: James Lenoci, International Consultant Reporting Language: English The TE evaluator would like to acknowledge the feedback provided by the interviewed stakeholders, including the National Project Director, Project Coordinator, the project management team, the UNDP country office staff, local partners and beneficiaries, and other governmental and non-governmental stakeholders. PIMS 4855 TE report_20180930_final Terminal Evaluation Report 2018 Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity-compatible livelihoods in and around PAs UNDP PIMS ID: 4855; GEF Project ID: 4584 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................. i Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................ ix 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Evaluation ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Evaluation Scope and Methodology ................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Structure of the Evaluation Report ................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Ethics ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.5 Evaluation Ratings............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Audit Trail.......................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.7 Limitations ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 2 Project Description and Development Context ......................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Project start and duration ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Problems that the project sought to address ................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Immediate and development objectives of the project ................................................................................... 5 2.4 Baseline indicators established ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.5 Main stakeholders ............................................................................................................................................ 7 2.6 Project theory of change .................................................................................................................................. 9 3 Assessment of Project Design .................................................................................................................................. 12 3.1 Analysis of project results framework ............................................................................................................ 12 3.2 Assumptions and risks .................................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Lessons learned and linkages with other projects .......................................................................................... 17 3.4 Planned stakeholder participation .................................................................................................................. 18 3.5 Replication approach ...................................................................................................................................... 18 3.6 UNDP comparative advantage ........................................................................................................................ 19 3.7 Management arrangements ........................................................................................................................... 19 4 Assessment of Project Results ................................................................................................................................. 20 4.1 Outputs ........................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.2 Outcomes ........................................................................................................................................................ 29 4.2.1 Effectiveness ............................................................................................................................................... 29 4.2.2 Relevance ................................................................................................................................................... 37 4.2.3 Efficiency .................................................................................................................................................... 38 4.3 Sustainability ................................................................................................................................................... 40 4.4 Progress towards impact ................................................................................................................................ 42 5 Assessment of Monitoring & Evaluation Systems ................................................................................................... 44 5.1 M&E Design .................................................................................................................................................... 44 5.2 M&E implementation ..................................................................................................................................... 45 6 Assessment of Implementation and Execution ....................................................................................................... 47 6.1 Quality of implementation .............................................................................................................................. 47 6.2 Quality of execution ........................................................................................................................................ 48 7 Other Assessments .................................................................................................................................................. 48 7.1 Need for follow-up .......................................................................................................................................... 48 7.2 Materialization of cofinancing ........................................................................................................................ 48 7.3 Environmental and social safeguards ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PIMS 4855 TE REPORT.Pdf
    Terminal Evaluation Report UNDP-GEF Project: Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity-compatible livelihoods in and around PAs GEF Project ID: 4584 UNDP Project ID: 4855 Country: Kazakhstan Region: Europe and Central Asia Focal Areas (GEF-5): Biodiversity Land Degradation GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Executing Agencies: Forestry and Wildlife Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture Date Version 31 July 2018 01 First draft 30 September 02 Final Terminal Evaluation Report 2018 Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity-compatible livelihoods in and around PAs UNDP PIMS ID: 4855; GEF Project ID: 4584 Opening Page PROJECT DETAILS: Project Name: Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity- compatible livelihoods in and around PAs Project ID: GEF Project ID: 4584 UNDP PIMS ID: 4855 Country: Kazakhstan Region: Europe and Central Asia Focal Area: Biodiversity Funding Source: GEF Trust Fund Strategic Programs: GEF-5 Biodiversity Strategy, Objective 1: Improve Sustainability of Protected Area Systems GEF-5 Land Degradation Strategy, Objective 3: Integrated Landscapes: Reduce Pressures on natural resources from competing land uses in wider landscape GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme Implementation Modality: National Implementation Modality (NIM) Executing Agency: Forestry and Wildlife Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture Responsible Partners:
    [Show full text]
  • 43439-033: CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Sections
    Social Monitoring Report Project Number: 43439-033 July 2020 KAZ: CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Section) Investment Program – Tranche 2 Prepared by the "SNS-2017" LLP for the Ministry of Industry and Infrastructure Development, Republic of Kazakhstan and the Asian Development Bank. This bi-annual social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status or any territory or area. 5th BIANNUAL REPORT ON SOCIAL SAFEGUARD MEASURES Internal Monitoring Loan: 2967-KAZ Project of reconstruction of the highway "Zhetybay–Zhanaozen– Kenderli–Turkmenistan Border" (to Turkmenbashy) section km 0–73 Report on Social Safeguard Measures. Internal Monitoring. Project of Reconstruction of the highway "Zhetybay–Zhanaozen–Kenderli–Turkmenistan Border" (to Turkmenbashy) section km 0–73. 5th Bi-annual Report. Prepared by: Consultant for Supervision Construction "SNS-2017" LLP (Kazakhstan) For: - Committee for Roads, Ministry of Industry and Infrastructure Development of RK - Asian Development Bank; - Project Management Consultant: “Renardet S.A.” Report period: January-June 2020 1 Report on Social Safeguard Measures. Internal Monitoring. Project of Reconstruction of the highway "Zhetybay–Zhanaozen–Kenderli–Turkmenistan Border" (to Turkmenbashy) section km 0–73.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Economic Zone «Seaport Aktau »
    SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE «SEAPORT AKTAU » THE AREA OF YOUR SUCCESS SEZ Advantageous geographical location SEAPORT AKTAU RUSSIAN FEDERATION Type of government Presidental Republic BELARUS Head of State KAZAKHSTANI MONGOLIA President Nazarbayev N.A. Population TURKEY China 18.376 million people IRAN Total area PAKISTAN 2,724,900 sq km. INDIA Capital: Astana Official languages kazakh, russian Why Kazakhstan? A business Bridge between Europe and Asia Availability of rich natural resources and minerals Single customs area with Russian Federation, the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Armenia and the Kyrgyz Republic The protection of investors' rights are ensured by political, economic and social stability in the country. Mangystau region SEZ SEAPORT AKTAU Located in the south-western part of Kazakhstan, on the east cost of Caspian sea. One of the leading regions of Kazakhstan, that makes a significant contribution to the socio-economic development and modernization of the country. ATYRAU REGION Opornyy Karazhanbas Kalamkas AKTOBE REGION Turush Bautino. Tushikudyk Kyzan Beyneu FORT-SHEVCHENKO Akzhigit Tigen Taushyq Shetpe Sai-Utes Mangystau (Mangyshlak) AKTAU (Shevchenko) Ushtagan Omirzak Zhetybay Munaishy Kyzylsai (Uzen) Zhanaozen REPUBLIC UZBEKISTAN Kuryk (Eraliev) Tenge Senek 1 Beineu district 2 Tupkaragan district Mangystau district Caspian Aksu 3 4 Karakiya district sea 4 Regional center 4 District center 4 City, village REPUBLIC 4 Railway TURKMENISTAN 5 Highway 4 Villages TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS POTENTIAL SEZ OF THE REGION SEAPORT
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Opportunities of the Mangystau Region in Achieving
    Expanding the opportunities of the Mangystau region in achieving sustainable development and socio-economic modernization MPTF OFFICE ANNUAL PROGRAMME NARRATIVE PROGRESS REPORT REPORTING PERIOD: 1 JANUARY – 31 DECEMBER 2015 Country, Locality(s), Priority Area(s) / Strategic Programme Title & Project Number Results • Programme Title: “Expanding the opportunities Kazakhstan, Mangystau region of the Mangystau region in achieving sustainable Priority area/ strategic results development and socio-economic • Reduction of inequities and disparities in social modernization” well-being for the vulnerable populations, • Programme Number: increase of employment, improving key health • MPTF Office Project Reference Number: indicators • Enhancement of the capacities of local government to plan for diversified and balanced local economic growth and expansion of income generation opportunities and local self- governance development • Formation and use of sustainable development practices in response to the current problems caused by climate change, natural and man-made aspects of development Participating Organization(s) Implementing Partners UNDP, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, • The Ministry of National Economy of the UN Women, and WHO Republic of Kazakhstan and the Akimat of Mangystau Region Programme/Project Cost (US$) Programme Duration Total approved budget as per project document: Overall Duration $8,259,333 30 months JP Contribution Agency Contribution: UNDP ($700,000); UNICEF ($306,500); WHO Start Date ($250,000); UNHCR ($90,000); UNFPA ($70,000);
    [Show full text]
  • 43439-033: Zhetybai-Zhanaozen Road Section (Km 0-73) Initial
    Initial Environmental Assessment Project Number: 43439-033 Second draft 15 May 2015 Kazakhstan: CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Sections) Investment Program, Project 2 [Zhetybai- Zhanaozen Road Section (Km 0–73)] Prepared by Committee of Roads under the Ministry of Investments and Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan This initial environmental assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT KAZ: CAREC CORRIDOR 2 (MANGISTAU OBLAST SECTION) ZHETYBAI-ZHANAOZEN 0-73 KM Content ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 7 EXECTUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................17 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Book Water 1A
    ATLAS OF WATER MINING DEVICES IN THE ARID ZONES OF KAZAKHSTAN (HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF WATER USE IN THE MIDDLE DESERTS) ЛАБОРАТОРИЯ ГЕОАРХЕОЛОГИИ Алматы On the cover, above: Map of the belt-zonal division of the territory of Kazakhstan (Yevstifeev Yu.G., Rachkovskaya E.I., Sadvokasov R.E.) where 6 arid zones explored in this book are highlighted in yellow. Below: left: at a well in the South-Western Balkhash on the border of the Taukum desert (Rumyantsev, 1913) right: beginning of a karez line trapping groundwater between 2 dried aquifers of the Sauran district, Turkestan oasis (aerial photo by R. Sala 2003) AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL LABORATORY "GEOARCHEOLOGY" R. SALA , J.-M. DEOM ATLAS OF WATER MINING DEVICES IN THE ARID ZONE OF KAZAKHSTAN (HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF WATER USE IN THE MIDDLE DESERTS) Almaty Kazakh University 2020 УДК 55:902 C 16 Recommended to the Academic Council of the Faculty of History, Archeology and Ethnology. Minutes No. 2, dated September 25, 2020. Printed according to the project - “Traditional methods of water supply in arid zones of Kazakhstan: ethnological and geoarcheological approaches” Sala R., Deom J.-M. C 16 Atlas of water mining devices in the arid zone of Kazakhstan (Historical evolution of water use in the Middle deserts).Monographs. Almaty: Kazakh University, 2020. ISBN 978-601-04-4813-1 The research will be inclusive of field and cameral works and laboratory analyses: reading all available information about past and present, relict and active water collection devices; documenting their surface or buried structure and all the elements of the material culture associated with their activity; studying the hydrogeological, environmental and archaeological context; gathering ethnological data through local documents and interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’S Oil Sector WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’s Oil Sector WATCH Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’s Oil Sector Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-937-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org SEPTEMBER 2012 ISBN: 1-56432-937-2 Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’s Oil Sector Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Ersai Caspian Contractor
    [Show full text]
  • Mangystau Oblast Section) Investment Program – Tranche 2
    Environmental Monitoring Report Project Number: 43439-033 July 2019 KAZ: CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Section) Investment Program – Tranche 2 Prepared by the "SNS-2017" LLP for the Ministry of Investments and Development, Republic of Kazakhstan and the Asian Development Bank. This bi-annual environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status or any territory or area. Semiannual environmental monitoring report ________________________________________________________________ LOAN No. 2967-KAZ Period: January-June 2019 July 2019 The Republic of Kazakhstan: МMF CAREС 2 Transport Corridor 2: INVESTMENT PROGRAM, Project 2 Financed by Asian Development Bank Prepared by: “SNS-2017” LLP, Kazakhstan Ministry of Industry and Infrastructural Development, Kazakhstan Committee for Roads This report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government can not be held liable for its contents COMMITTEE FOR ROADS MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN LOAN No.2967-KAZ CENTRAL ASIA REGIONAL ECONOMIC COOPERATION (CAREC) TRANSPORT CORRIDOR 2 INVESTMENT PROGRAM, MANGISTAU REGION, PROJECT 2 RECONSTRUCTION OF THE “ZHETIBAY-ZHANAOZEN-KENDERLI-TURKMENISTAN BOARDER” HIGHWAY Section km 0 - km 73 Financed by ADB through Multi-Tranche Financing Facility (MFF) Semiannual Environmental Monitoring Report (Period: January – June 2019) July 2019 Prepared by CSC “SNS-2017” LLP in accordance with the reporting requirements of the Contract for Consultant’s Services No.
    [Show full text]
  • Deposits of the Hydrocarbon Raw Materials of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Where It Is Possible to Introduce a Microbiological Method for Stimulating the Formation
    E3S Web of Conferences 280, 01002 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128001002 ICSF 2021 Deposits of the hydrocarbon raw materials of the Republic of Kazakhstan, where it is possible to introduce a microbiological method for stimulating the formation Olga Kuderinova1,*, Makhambet Shmanov1, and Mykhailo Filatiev2 1Karaganda Technical University, Development of Mineral Deposits Department, 56 N. Nazarbayev Str., 100027, Karaganda, Republic of Kazakhstan 2Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University, 59a Central Ave., Severodonetsk, 93406, Ukraine Abstract. The article is devoted to the analysis and systematization of data on hydrocarbon deposits in the Republic of Kazakhstan, highlighting those aspects that will allow the use of this method. The microbiological method of exposure refers to the chemical methods of the tertiary stage of development of oil reservoirs. It has already proven its effectiveness in highly depleted, waterflooded formations with irregular, diffuse oil saturation. Its main advantages are its relative cheapness, it does not require additional equipment during injecting of the microorganisms into the reservoir, and for their nutrition, as a rule, food industry waste is used, and its implementation cannot cause harmful effects on the environment. Also, a fairly extensive database was compiled, according to which various classifications of the republic's deposits were created. 1 Introduction removed, plus gases that can be extremely hazardous to health will be released. And chemical solutions can The purpose of the study was to identify the parameters permanently poison underground waters, which will needed for the introduction of the method of entail the death of all flora on the surface. microbiological influence on oil reservoirs, justification of the need for its use, as well as collection, analysis and systematization of data on all known this type deposits of 2 About the method of the the republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development Report 2019
    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2019 STRIVING FOR PROGRESS CONTENTS | 2 Report Overview | 4 KMG Group Key Performance Indicators | 16 Message of the Chairman of the Board of Directors | 18 Message of the Chairman of the Management Board 20 34 48 56 88 102 Company Overview Sustainability Economic Environmental Social Appendices Management Performance Responsibility and Safety at the Workplace Responsibility Company’s Mission Sustainability Integration Generated and Distributed Our Approach to the Management Employment Appendix 1 and Strategic Intents | 34 Economic Value | 56 | 88 Reporting Limits, Changes, Notes | 24 | 49 | 102 Ethics and Integrity Workplace Safety Equal Opportunities Corporate Governance | 37 Implementation of Investment | 58 and Our Market Presence Appendix 2 | 25 Projects | 93 Environmental Indicators Mechanisms for Seeking Advice | 50 Occupational Health | 105 Key Corporate Events in 2019 on Unethical Conduct and Workplace Hygiene Observance of Human Rights | 31 | 37 Procurement Practices | 61 and Social Assistance Appendix 3 | 52 | 94 GRI Content Index Digital Transformation Stakeholder Engagement Industrial Safety | 108 | 32 | 39 Anti-Corruption Management | 62 Staff Development | 54 | 97 Appendix 4 Identification of Material Topics Environmental Performance Abbreviations and Acronyms of the Report | 64 Our Communities | 117 | 41 | 99 Transition to Low Carbon Contact details Initiatives and Memberships Development | 118 | 44 | 79 Compliance with Requirements | 85 HSE training | 86 1 Report Company Sustainability Economic Environmental Liability Social Appendices Overview Overview Management Performance and Workplace Safety Responsibility Sustainability report 2019 United Nations REPORT OVERVIEW Global Compact GRI 102-1, 102-32, 102-46, 102-50, 102-52, 102-54 Businesses should support and respect the protection of the internationally Principle 1 proclaimed human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES of KAZAKHSTAN Niche Projects
    INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES 2018 OF KAZAKHSTAN Evrak doğrulamak için: https://e-belge.sanayi.gov.tr/ Belge Kodu: ef96e957-da93-41e0-a52a-45eaeea945d8e5b4d352-3513-470e-ab6c-b78e0b57b6daNiche projects ile erişebilirsiniz. Machinery construction and metallurgy Production of copper pipes Project overview: Market prerequisites: Construction of a copper pipes production • Import substituition – Kazakhstan does plant not have copper pipes production plant. Investment amount: US$ 59,345 thousand Demand in the domestic market is fully covered by imported goods. Products: copper pipes with external diameter of 6-46 mm as per ASTM standard • Export potential. Kazakhstan’s geographical location and the high Location: demand for copper pipes in China, Special Economic Zone Saryаrka, Russia, Ukraine and Belarus Karaganda city demonstrates opportunity to boost sales. Project implementation period: • Stable growth of raw materials 24 years, including 1 year of construction production. In 2016, Kazakhstan Target markets: Kazakhstan, Russia, China, produced 408,435 tonnes of refined, Belarus, Ukraine and Austria unprocessed and unalloyed copper Suppliers: local suppliers of raw materials, (+ 3.5% compared to 2015). foreign equipment suppliers Consumers: companies operating in the fields of gas supply, heat supply and automotive industry Project profitability Key investment indicators 250,000 30% 26% Indicator Result 25% 200,000 20% 18% 18% Investment amount, US$ thousands 59,345 20% 150,000 14% 15% Project NPV, US$ thousands 22,587 100,000 US$ thousandsUS$ 10% IRR, % 21.4% 50,000 46,536 33,338 5% EBITDA margin, % 19% 95,043 187,842 235,898 0 0% Payback period, years 6.4 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 14 Year 24 Discounted payback period, years 9.6 Revenue, US$ thousands EBITDA margin, % Plant location Special economic zone provides a special legal regime and preferences to its residents, such as, provision of land plots for the secondary land use (sublease) and infrastructure facilities for lease (sublease) to the persons engaged in ancillary services.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Associations, Centres and Clubs for Unesco 4040
    As of November 2020 LIST OF ASSOCIATIONS, CENTRES AND CLUBS FOR UNESCO * 4040 TOTAL / 77 Member States * Breakdown by regions: 1744 Clubs in 15 APA MSs, 1719 Clubs in 22 AFR MSs, 463 Clubs in 26 ENA MSs (3 NatComs are currently reviewing Clubs’ accreditation), 77 Clubs in 10 ARB MSs, 37 Clubs in 4 LAC MSs. The List will be continuously evolving and updated as necessary. Contents ALGERIA – 3 TOTAL......................................................................................................................................... 5 ANGOLA – 1 TOTAL ........................................................................................................................................ 5 ARMENIA – 9 TOTAL ....................................................................................................................................... 5 AUSTRALIA – 1 TOTAL .................................................................................................................................... 6 AUSTRIA – 2 TOTAL ........................................................................................................................................ 6 AZERBAIJAN – 5 TOTAL ................................................................................................................................... 6 BELARUS – 56 TOTAL ...................................................................................................................................... 7 BELGIUM (FLANDERS) – 1 TOTAL .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]