DOCSLIB.ORG

AFH 10-222, VOLUME 14 Civil Engineer Guide to Fighting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AIR FORCE HANDBOOK 10-222, VOLUME 14 1 August 2008 CIVIL ENGINEER GUIDE TO FIGHTING POSITIONS, SHELTERS, OBSTACLES, AND REVETMENTS DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE This Page Intentionally Left Blank BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE HANDBOOK 10-222, VOLUME 14 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 1 August 2008 Certified Current, 8 March 2012 Operations CIVIL ENGINEER GUIDE TO FIGHTING POSITIONS, SHELTERS, OBSTACLES, AND REVETMENTS ______________________________________________________________ ACCESSIBILITY: This publication is available on the e-Publishing website at http://www.e-publishing.af.mil for downloading and ordering. RELEASABILITY: There are no releasability restrictions. ______________________________________________________________ OPR: HQ AFCESA/CEXX Certified by: HQ AF/A7CX (Colonel Donald L. Gleason) Pages: 157 Supersedes: AFH 10-222V14, 1 November 2000 ______________________________________________________________ This handbook addresses expedient construction and employment of fighting positions, shelters, obstacles, and revetments in the expeditionary environ- ment. It is designed as a reference for deployed civil engineers. The defensive measures are primarily intended for protection against conventional weapons effects. It is applicable to active duty, Air National Guard, and Air Force Re- serve engineers. Refer recommended changes and questions about this publi- cation to the Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) using the AF IMT 847, Recommendation for Change of Publication; route AF Its 847 from the field through Major Command (MAJCOM) publications/forms managers. Ensure all records created as a result of processes prescribed in this publication are maintained in accordance with AFMAN 33-363, Management of Records, and disposed of in accordance with the Air Force Records Disposition Sched- ule (RDS) at https://afrims.amc.af.mil. The use of the name or mark of any specific manufacturer, commercial product, commodity, or service in this publication does not imply endorsement by the Air Force. AFH 10-222 Volume 14 1 August 2008 2 SUMMARY OF CHANGES This publication has been substantially revised and must be completely re- viewed. This revision removes obsolete force protection measures and incor- porates the latest tactics, techniques, and procedures used by civil engineers to implement physical security measures in the expeditionary environment. Preface. ...…………………………………………………………………..10 Chapter 1—INTRODUCTION. .................................................................11 1.1. Overview. ............................................................................... 11 Figure 1.1. Historic Earthworks. …………...................................................11 1.2. The Threat. ............................................................................. 12 Table 1.1. Typical Weapons and Their Effects. .......................................... 12 Figure 1.2. Pressure-Time Curve. ............................................................... 13 1.3. Planning. ................................................................................ 15 1.4. Protective Construction. ......................................................... 19 Figure 1.3. Protective Shelter Construction. ............................................... 19 Table 1.2. Security Engineering Series of Unified Facilities Criteria. ..........20 Chapter 2—FIGHTING POSITIONS. ..........………………....................21 2.1. Overview. ............................................................................... 21 2.2. Safety. .................................................................................... 21 2.3. Materials. .............................................................................. 21 Table 2.1. Checklist – Basic Criteria for Fighting Positions. ...................... 22 2.4. Hasty Fighting Positions. ...................................................... 23 Figure 2.1. Hasty Fighting Position. ............................................................ 24 2.5. Deliberate Fighting Positions. ................................................ 24 Figure 2.2. One-Person Deliberate Fighting Position. ................................. 25 AFH 10-222 Volume 14 1 August 2008 3 Figure 2.3. Outlining One-Person Fighting Position. .................................. 26 Figure 2.4. Grenade Sump – One-Person Fighting Position. .. .................... 27 Figure 2.5. Fighting Position Revetment. ......................................................28 Figure 2.6. Reinforced Trenches. ................................................................ 30 Figure 2.7. Ground Shock Intercept Trenches. ............................................ 30 Table 2.2. Checklist – Fighting Position Revetments and Trenches. ......... 31 Table 2.3. Timber and Processed Lumber Comparison. ............................. 33 Figure 2.8. Placement of Roof Support Logs. ............................................. 33 Table 2.4. Center-to-Center Spacing for Wood Stringers and Soil Cover to Defeat Contact Bursts. ................................................................................ 34 Figure 2.9. Illustration of Unsupported Span and On-Center Spacing. ....... 35 Figure 2.10. Dustproof Layer. ..................................................................... 35 Figure 2.11. Completed Fighting Position – Side View. ............................. 36 Table 2.5. Checklist – Fighting Position Overhead Cover. ........................ 37 Figure 2.12. Two-Person Deliberate Fighting Position. .............................. 39 Figure 2.13. Grenade Sumps – Two-Person Deliberate Fighting Position. ..40 Figure 2.14. Typical Sectors of Fire. ........................................................... 42 Figure 2.15. Curved Two-Person Deliberate Fighting Position. ...................42 Figure 2.16. Basic Machine Gun Fighting Position. ................................... 43 Figure 2.17. Top View – Three-Person Machine Gun Fighting Position. ... 44 Figure 2.18. Rear View – Three-Person Machine Gun Fighting Position. .. 44 Figure 2.19. L-Shaped Machine Gun Fighting Position. ............................. 45 Figure 2.20. Horseshoe-Shaped Machine Gun Fighting Position. .............. 45 Figure 2.21. Mortar Position. ...................................................................... 46 AFH 10-222 Volume 14 1 August 2008 4 Figure 2.22. Light Antitank Weapon (LAW) Fighting Position. ................ 47 Figure 2.23. Earth Containers Being Expanded and Filled On-site. ........... 48 Figure 2.24. Improved Foundation. ............................................................. 49 Figure 2.25. First Layer – Single-Bay Fighting Position. ............................ 50 Figure 2.26. Second Layer – Single-Bay Fighting Position. ........... ............ 51 Figure 2.27. Composite Panels – Single-Bay Fighting Position. ................. 51 Figure 2.28. Waterproof Membrane – Single-Bay Fighting Position. ......... 52 Figure 2.29. Overhead Cover – Single-Bay Fighting Position. ................... 53 Figure 2.30. Completed Single–Bay Fighting Position. .............................. 53 Chapter 3—PROTECTIVE STRUCTURES. ...........................................54 3.1. Overview. ............................................................................... 54 Figure 3.1. Protective Structures. .. .............................................................. 54 3.2. Expedient Protective Structures. ............................................ 55 Figure 3.2. Corrugated Metal Culvert Shelter. ............................................ 56 Figure 3.3. Top View – Fighting Bunker. .. ................................................. 58 Figure 3.4. Front View – Fighting Bunker. ...................................................58 Figure 3.5. Layout and Design – Fighting Bunker. ..................................... 59 Table 3.1. Fighting Bunker Bill of Materials. .. ........................................... 60 Table 3.2. Thickness of Wood to Support Earth Cover. .............................. 60 3.3. Prefabricated Structures. ........................................................ 61 Figure 3.6. Expandable Tactical Shelter. .................................................... 61 Figure 3.7. ISO Bunker. .............................................................................. 62 Figure 3.8. First Layer – ISO Bunker. ......................................................... 63 AFH 10-222 Volume 14 1 August 2008 5 Figure 3.9. Second Layer – ISO Bunker. ..................................................... 64 Figure 3.10. Roof Support – ISO Bunker. ................................................... 65 Figure 3.11. Sheet Piling – ISO Bunker. ..................................... ................ 66 Figure 3.12. Waterproof Membrane – ISO Bunker. .....................................66 Figure 3.13. Overhead Cover – ISO Bunker. .............................................. 67 Table 3.3. Visual Checklist – ISO Bunker. .................................................. 67 3.4. Reinforced Concrete Bunkers. ..... .......................................... 68 Figure 3.14. Reinforced Concrete Bunkers. .................................. .............. 69 Chapter 4—OBSTACLES. ....................................................................... 70 4.1. Overview. ............................................................................... 70 4.2. Planning. .... ............................................................................ 70 4.3. Natural Obstacles. .................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Shoulders of Atlas: Rural Communities and Nuclear Missile Base Construction in Nebraska, 1958-1962

    The Shoulders of Atlas: Rural Communities and Nuclear Missile Base Construction in Nebraska, 1958-1962

    The Shoulders of Atlas: Rural Communities and Nuclear Missile Base Construction in Nebraska, 1958-1962 (Article begins on page 2 below.) This article is copyrighted by History Nebraska (formerly the Nebraska State Historical Society). You may download it for your personal use. For permission to re-use materials, or for photo ordering information, see: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/re-use-nshs-materials Learn more about Nebraska History (and search articles) here: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/nebraska-history-magazine History Nebraska members receive four issues of Nebraska History annually: https://history.nebraska.gov/get-involved/membership Full Citation: Nick Batter, “The Shoulders of Atlas: Rural Communities and Nuclear Missile Base Construction in Nebraska, 1958-1962,” Nebraska History 93 (2012): 54-83 Article Summary: Base construction for America’s first intercontinental ballistic missile, the Atlas, pushed several rural Nebraska communities to the front lines of the Cold War. The project brought needed jobs to residents struggling through a sharp economic recession, but it also drew protestors who questioned the wisdom and morality of the nuclear program. Cataloging Information: Names: Dwight D Eisenhower, Renald Barrett, Everett Barrett, Tom Gerrity, Bob Kerry, A J Muste, Bradford Lyttle, Ralph Burnett, Walter Gormly, Bill Osick, John Newman, Milford Johnson, Kenneth Johnson, Ailene Rauer Nebraska Place Names: Mead (Saunders County), Lincoln, Omaha Keywords: Atlas, intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM),
  • 68: Protest, Policing, and Urban Space by Hans Nicholas Sagan A

    68: Protest, Policing, and Urban Space by Hans Nicholas Sagan A

    Specters of '68: Protest, Policing, and Urban Space by Hans Nicholas Sagan A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Galen Cranz, Chair Professer C. Greig Crysler Professor Richard Walker Summer 2015 Sagan Copyright page Sagan Abstract Specters of '68: Protest, Policing, and Urban Space by Hans Nicholas Sagan Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture University of California, Berkeley Professor Galen Cranz, Chair Political protest is an increasingly frequent occurrence in urban public space. During times of protest, the use of urban space transforms according to special regulatory circumstances and dictates. The reorganization of economic relationships under neoliberalism carries with it changes in the regulation of urban space. Environmental design is part of the toolkit of protest control. Existing literature on the interrelation of protest, policing, and urban space can be broken down into four general categories: radical politics, criminological, technocratic, and technical- professional. Each of these bodies of literature problematizes core ideas of crowds, space, and protest differently. This leads to entirely different philosophical and methodological approaches to protests from different parties and agencies. This paper approaches protest, policing, and urban space using a critical-theoretical methodology coupled with person-environment relations methods. This paper examines political protest at American Presidential National Conventions. Using genealogical-historical analysis and discourse analysis, this paper examines two historical protest event-sites to develop baselines for comparison: Chicago 1968 and Dallas 1984. Two contemporary protest event-sites are examined using direct observation and discourse analysis: Denver 2008 and St.
  • The Star Fort, September, 1814

    The Star Fort, September, 1814

    D-JLJ- UNITED STATES DEPARTHEI'irrr OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE FORT MCHENRY NATIONAL MONUMENT AND HISTORIC SHRINE BALTIMORE 30, MARYLAND \\St ARtftlOlOGY The .Star Fort, September, 1814 Prepared by: Dr. W. Richard Walsh Contract Historian · Georgetown University Georgetown, D.C. November, 1958 r~ , .. I . ,. .. - •• '' I• ,•' --:• ' . '·· ~ -,, .. ., . · .· .. :· .·. • , :: .:'~ .: :/ F.1 _r1 .. .J '~ l. \ '. \~ IJ li :i. /:i1('fl ---. \J .. •• 1 : ... .. .. .. ,,.. - l ~ j Table of Contents Page Frontispiece ••••••••••••••• • • • • ii I. Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 II. The Star Fort, September 12-14, 1814 • • • • • • • 7 24 III. Conclusions. • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 • • • • • • ._: I f ,\ .. i ) ~ ',...___/ Errata p .. 2, line 60 '0 indiaten should read '0 indicate.io p. 3, line 4o "war-fare" should read 10 warfareo 18 p. a, line 8. "amatuer" should read "amateur.~ p .. 7, fn. 1, line 5. "principle" should read ~principal." p. 9, line 12. "wa.tteries" should read "batteries. ~ p. 10, · line 10. Delete "which." p .. 10, line 11. "patforms" should read "platforms." p. 10, line 17. "Descius" should read "Decius." p. 13, fn. \:1 9 line 5. "Jessup" should read "Jesupn in this and all subsequent mention of the name. o. 19, line 16~ "orciinarilly" should read "ordinarily .. '° p. 26, line 5. "Carrol" should read "Carroll." p. 26, line 7. "confederates" should read "Confederates." .a- -. ( ... ~ "'·. / I Introduction In 1776, Baltimore prepared itself for. attack by the British~ Already apprehensive because of threats from the sea by His Majesty's vessel, the Otter, the Committee of Safety choose Whetstone Point as the best fortifiable site against enemy destruction to the Baltimore harbor. A fort of sorts was therefore erected, but because the threat of a general naval attack never materialized and the actual fight­ ing of the war of the Revolution by-passed Baltimoreans, a well armed Fort vVhetstone was not accomplished.
  • Hand to Hand Combat

    Hand to Hand Combat

    *FM 21-150 i FM 21-150 ii FM 21-150 iii FM 21-150 Preface This field manual contains information and guidance pertaining to rifle-bayonet fighting and hand-to-hand combat. The hand-to-hand combat portion of this manual is divided into basic and advanced training. The techniques are applied as intuitive patterns of natural movement but are initially studied according to range. Therefore, the basic principles for fighting in each range are discussed. However, for ease of learning they are studied in reverse order as they would be encountered in a combat engagement. This manual serves as a guide for instructors, trainers, and soldiers in the art of instinctive rifle-bayonet fighting. The proponent for this publication is the United States Army Infantry School. Comments and recommendations must be submitted on DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) directly to Commandant, United States Army Infantry School, ATTN: ATSH-RB, Fort Benning, GA, 31905-5430. Unless this publication states otherwise, masculine nouns and pronouns do not refer exclusively to men. iv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Hand-to-hand combat is an engagement between two or more persons in an empty-handed struggle or with handheld weapons such as knives, sticks, and rifles with bayonets. These fighting arts are essential military skills. Projectile weapons may be lost or broken, or they may fail to fire. When friendly and enemy forces become so intermingled that firearms and grenades are not practical, hand-to-hand combat skills become vital assets. 1-1. PURPOSE OF COMBATIVES TRAINING Today’s battlefield scenarios may require silent elimination of the enemy.
  • Construction Guidelines for Wildlife Fencing and Associated Escape and Lateral Access Control Measures

    Construction Guidelines for Wildlife Fencing and Associated Escape and Lateral Access Control Measures

    CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES FOR WILDLIFE FENCING AND ASSOCIATED ESCAPE AND LATERAL ACCESS CONTROL MEASURES Requested by: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standing Committee on the Environment Prepared by: Marcel P. Huijser, Angela V. Kociolek, Tiffany D.H. Allen, Patrick McGowen Western Transportation Institute – Montana State University PO Box 174250 Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 Patricia C. Cramer 264 E 100 North, Logan, Utah 84321 Marie Venner Lakewood, CO 80232 April 2015 The information contained in this report was prepared as part of NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 84, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board. SPECIAL NOTE: This report IS NOT an official publication of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, or The National Academies. Wildlife Fencing and Associated Measures Disclaimer DISCLAIMER DISCLAIMER STATEMENT The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency that performed the research and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board or its sponsors. The information contained in this document was taken directly from the submission of the author(s). This document is not a report of the Transportation Research Board or of the National Research Council. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was requested by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and conducted as part of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 25-25 Task 84. The NCHRP is supported by annual voluntary contributions from the state Departments of Transportation. Project 25-25 is intended to fund quick response studies on behalf of the AASHTO Standing Committee on the Environment.
  • A Sharp Little Affair: the Archeology of Big Hole Battlefield

    A Sharp Little Affair: the Archeology of Big Hole Battlefield

    A Sharp Little Affair: The Archeology of the Big Hole Battlefield By Douglas D. Scott With Special Sections by Melissa A. Connor Dick Harmon Lester Ross REPRINTS IN ANTHROPOLOGY VOLUME 45 1994 Published by J & L Reprint Company 410 Wedgewood Drive Lincoln, Nebraska 68510 Revised for PDF publication June 2009 Acknowledgments First and foremost we wish to acknowledge and thank Hank Williams, Jr. for his interest and financial support. The National Park Service seldom has the luxury of conducting an archeological research project that is not tied to some development project or some overriding management action. Mr. William's support allowed us to pursue this investigation for the benefit of the park without being tied to a specific management requirement. His support did allow us to accomplish several management goals that otherwise would have waited their turn in the priority system. This project has had more than its fair share of those who have given their time, resources, and knowledge without thought of compensation. Specifically Irwin and Riva Lee are to be commended for their willingness to ramrod the metal detecting crew. They volunteered for the duration for which we are truly grateful. Aubrey Haines visited us during the field investigations and generously shared his vast knowledge of the Big Hole battle history with us. His willingness to loan material and respond to our questions is truly appreciated. Former Unit Manager Jock Whitworth and his entire staff provided much support and aid during the investigations. Jock and his staff allowed us to invade the park and their good-natured acceptance of our disruption to the daily schedule is acknowledged with gratitude.
  • Fortification Renaissance: the Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne

    Fortification Renaissance: the Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne

    FORTIFICATION RENAISSANCE: THE ROMAN ORIGINS OF THE TRACE ITALIENNE Robert T. Vigus Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2013 APPROVED: Guy Chet, Committee Co-Chair Christopher Fuhrmann, Committee Co-Chair Walter Roberts, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Vigus, Robert T. Fortification Renaissance: The Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne. Master of Arts (History), May 2013, pp.71, 35 illustrations, bibliography, 67 titles. The Military Revolution thesis posited by Michael Roberts and expanded upon by Geoffrey Parker places the trace italienne style of fortification of the early modern period as something that is a novel creation, borne out of the minds of Renaissance geniuses. Research shows, however, that the key component of the trace italienne, the angled bastion, has its roots in Greek and Roman writing, and in extant constructions by Roman and Byzantine engineers. The angled bastion of the trace italienne was yet another aspect of the resurgent Greek and Roman culture characteristic of the Renaissance along with the traditions of medicine, mathematics, and science. The writings of the ancients were bolstered by physical examples located in important trading and pilgrimage routes. Furthermore, the geometric layout of the trace italienne stems from Ottoman fortifications that preceded it by at least two hundred years. The Renaissance geniuses combined ancient bastion designs with eastern geometry to match a burgeoning threat in the rising power of the siege cannon. Copyright 2013 by Robert T. Vigus ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the assistance and encouragement of many people.
  • Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo, ND 2009," May 2009 Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo,ND 2009

    Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo, ND 2009," May 2009 Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo,ND 2009

    ENCLOSURE 2 Wenck Associates, Inc., "Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo, ND 2009," May 2009 Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo,ND 2009 Wenck File #2283-01 Prepared for: Hesco Bastion, LLC 47152 Conrad E. Anderson Drive Hammond, LA 70401 Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 3310 Fiechtner Drive; Suite 110 May 2009 Fargo, North Dakota (701) 297-9600 SWenck Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Evaluation......................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Background Information ...................................................................................... 1-3 2.0 CITY OF FARGO USES OF HESCO BARRIERS ......................... 2-1 2.1 Number of Miles Used Versus Total ................................................................... 2-1 2 .2 S izes ........................................................................................................ ............. 2 -1 2.3 Installation Rates .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.4 Complicating Factors .......................................................................................... 2-1 3.0 INTERVIEWS WITH CITY AND CITY REPRESENTATIVES ............................. 3-1 3.1 Issues Raised and Areas of Concern .................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Comments
  • POETRY OFFERINGS from David W. Mitchell

    POETRY OFFERINGS from David W. Mitchell

    1 POETRY OFFERINGS from David W. Mitchell 2 Photography of David Mitchell by Ken Roberts Cover photography by Jeremiah Trilli Line drawing by Summer Breeze Published by Motherbird Books Silver City, New Mexico motherbird.com © David W. Mitchell 2008 3 Index A Dark Hole In Time . 8 A Gift . 9 A Lovely Day for Borscht Fish . 10 A Modern Carollette for Dodgson . 11 Abroad Among the Limbless . 12 Adagio in Zzzzz Minor . 13 Afternoon of a Biblioparadisiac . 14 Ah Dylan, Dylan . 15 An Olympian Lesson . 16 Apostatic Succession . 17 Ballad of Saint Louis, the Unfrocked Cardinal 18 Belle Ardoise I, The . 20 Blatissimus . 21 Blue Writer, The . 22 Carmel I . 23 Carmel II . 25 Chelsea . 27 Compass Rose and the Gypsy Will . 28 Compendium Humanum . 29 Concertina in F-Stop Major . 31 Critique . 32 Cursive Reclaimed . 33 Cutting Corners I; Cutting Corners II . 34 Departure of Roses, The . 35 Diasporulation . 36 Disappearance . 37 Drizzle . 38 Doubling Duplicity . 39 Eleven Red-Haired Men . 40 Encampment, The . 41 Epitaph for Floyd . 42 Fangs . 43 Father Time Contemplates Mass . 44 4 Fingersongs- I . 45 For Edna, and John, and All . 46 For Jessica and the Williams . 47 For Mimi Farina: Bread and Roses . 51 From A to Z and Back Again . 52 Goulashification . 53 Heard On the Concertina Wire . 54 Helicocochoidal Figmentation. 55 Hexing the Circle . 56 Hillock and the Holly, The . 57 How I knew What to Do . 59 In Praise of Thumbs . 60 In Praise of Thumbs II . 61 In the Mailstrom . 63 In Sacramental Jeans . 64 Infinite Regress of Dawn, The .
  • Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No

    Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No

    Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No. 1995-2174) Phase I Architectural Identification Survey Chesterfield County, Virginia Phase I Archaeological Identification Survey for the Route 10 Project (Bermuda Triangle to Meadowville) Chesterfield County, Virginia VDOT Project No. 0010-020-632, UPC #101020 Prepared for: Prepared for: Richmond District Department of Transportation 2430VDOT Pine Richmond Forest Drive District Department of Transportation 9800 Government Center Parkway Colonial2430 Heights, Pine Forest VA Drive23834 9800 Government Center Parkway Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Colonial804 Heights,-524-6000 Virginia 23834 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804-748-1037 Prepared by: March 2013 Prepared by: McCormick Taylor, Inc. North Shore Commons A 4951 McCormickLake Brook Drive, Taylor Suite 275 NorthGlen ShoreAllen, VirginiaCommons 23060 A 4951 Lake Brook Drive, Suite 275 Glen Allen, VA 23060 May 2013 804-762-5800 May 2013 Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No. 1995-2174) Phase I Architectural Identification Survey Phase I ArchaeologicalChesterfield County,Identification Virginia Survey for the Route 10 Project (Bermuda Triangle to Meadowville) Chesterfield County, Virginia VDOT Project No. 0010-020-632, UPC #101020 Prepared for: Prepared for: Richmond District Department of Transportation 2430VDOT Pine Richmond Forest Drive District Department of Transportation 9800 Government Center Parkway Colonial2430 Heights, Pine Forest VA Drive23834 9800 Government Center Parkway Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Colonial804 Heights,-524-6000 Virginia 23834 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804-748-1037 Prepared by: March 2013 Prepared by: McCormick Taylor NorthMcCormick Shore Commons Taylor, Inc.
  • Melvin Jones Fellow

    Melvin Jones Fellow

    NORTH DAKOTA Volume 33, Number 12 | Offi LIONcial Publication of Lions Districts 5NE & 5NW | June 2011 Mandan Lions feed fl ood volunteers Submitted by 5NW VDG Pat Vannett On May 25, 2011, Lions Kevin and Pat Vannett of the Mandan Dacotah Lions approached Mandan Mayor Tim Helbling with the idea of organizing food for all of the volunteers that would be needed to fi ght the fl ood. He replied “that would be awesome.” Th e Mandan Dacotah Lions board of directors quickly acted to approve the project and Mandan Lions Club President; Jeff Erickson called his club for workers and within THREE hours Kevin and Pat had organized donations of water, food, and tents. Th e grills were lit and our journey began. Because of the working relationship that all of the Lions of Mandan have with business owners in our community, those businesses quickly got on board to support this project. Many businesses stepped up to the plate when asked to help. Others called us to ask “what do you need, we want to help.” Th is was truly a community wide eff ort where every church, organization, Setting up to feed the volunteers in the 2011 fl ood fi ght are Lion business and private person united in the fi ght to save our city. Bill Schott of the Mandan Lions and Lion Kevin Vannett along with Th e Red Cross soon came by and was quite impressed with his son Matt, and Lion Marcy Moore of the Mandan Dacotah the organization that was in place. Th ey soon were calling to see Lions.
  • 1812; the War, and Its Moral : a Canadian Chronicle

    1812; the War, and Its Moral : a Canadian Chronicle

    '^^ **7tv»* ^^ / ^^^^T^\/ %*^-'%p^ ^<>.*^7^\/ ^o^*- "o /Vi^/\ co^i^^.% Atii^/^-^^ /.' .*'% y A-^ ; .O*^ . <f,r*^.o^" X'^'^^V %--f.T*\o^^ V^^^^\<^ •^ 4.^ tri * -0 a5 «4q il1 »"^^ 11E ^ ^ THE WAR, AND ITS MORAL CANADIAN CHRONICLE. BY WILLIAM F?"C0FFIN, Esquire, FORMERLT SHERIFF OF THE DISTRICT OF MONTREAI,, LIEUT.-COLONKL, STAFF, ACIITB POROB, CANADA, AND H. M. AGENT FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE ORDNANCE ESTATES, CANADA. PRINTED BY JOHN LOVELL, ST. NICHOLAS STREET. 1864. E354 C^y 2. Entered, according to the Act of the Provincial Parliament, in the year one thousand eight hundred and sixty-four, by William F. Coffin, in the OfBce of the Registrar of the Province of Canada. Ea t\}t J^igfjt pjonourable ^ir (SbmtmtJ SSalhtr f cab, iarond, ^er Pajtstg's Post '§ononmbk ^ribg Council, ^nU late ffiobernor ©cneral anli C0mmanKcr4tt=(H;fjicf of IBxitislj Nortfj America, ©Ws (jrattatlinw (!>Uv0uicU 0f the ^m of I8I2 is rcspcctftillp tirtitcatEU, fig fjis fattfjful anU grateful .Scrfaant, WILLIAM P. COFFIN. Ottawa, 2nd January, 1864, TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE SIR EDMUND WALKER HEAD, BARONET. My dear Sir,—^I venture to appeal to your respected name as the best introduction for the little work which I" do myself the honour to dedicate to you. To you, indeed, it owes its existence. You conferred upon me the appointment I have the honour to hold under the Crown in Canada, and that appointment has given life to an idea, long cherished in embryo. The management of the Ordnance Lands in this Province has thrown me upon the scenes of the most notable events of the late war.