DOCSLIB.ORG

Construction Guidelines for Wildlife Fencing and Associated Escape and Lateral Access Control Measures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Construction Guidelines for Wildlife Fencing and Associated Escape and Lateral Access Control Measures CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES FOR WILDLIFE FENCING AND ASSOCIATED ESCAPE AND LATERAL ACCESS CONTROL MEASURES Requested by: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standing Committee on the Environment Prepared by: Marcel P. Huijser, Angela V. Kociolek, Tiffany D.H. Allen, Patrick McGowen Western Transportation Institute – Montana State University PO Box 174250 Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 Patricia C. Cramer 264 E 100 North, Logan, Utah 84321 Marie Venner Lakewood, CO 80232 April 2015 The information contained in this report was prepared as part of NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 84, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board. SPECIAL NOTE: This report IS NOT an official publication of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, or The National Academies. Wildlife Fencing and Associated Measures Disclaimer DISCLAIMER DISCLAIMER STATEMENT The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency that performed the research and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board or its sponsors. The information contained in this document was taken directly from the submission of the author(s). This document is not a report of the Transportation Research Board or of the National Research Council. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was requested by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and conducted as part of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 25-25 Task 84. The NCHRP is supported by annual voluntary contributions from the state Departments of Transportation. Project 25-25 is intended to fund quick response studies on behalf of the AASHTO Standing Committee on the Environment. The work was guided by a panel chaired by Todd Williams. Other panel members were Gail Anne D'Avino, Timothy Dexter, Norris Dodd, Jeff Gagnon, Todd Nichols, Kelly McAllister, Stirling Robertson, William C. Ruediger, and Leonard Sielecki, and Bill Ostrum was the FHWA liaison. The project was managed by Nanda Srinivasan and Crawford Jencks from NCHRP. Western Transportation Institute Page 2 Wildlife Fencing and Associated Measures Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................15 1.1. Background .................................................................................................................... 15 1.2. Overview and Purpose of the Mitigation Measures Included in this Report ................. 16 1.3. Organization of the Report ............................................................................................. 17 2. Literature Review...................................................................................................................18 2.1. Organization of Literature Review ................................................................................. 18 2.2. Keep Wildlife Off the Road ........................................................................................... 18 2.2.1. Fence Location and Length ..................................................................................... 18 2.2.2. Where to Start, Where to Stop? .............................................................................. 19 2.2.3. Fence Material and Dimensions .............................................................................. 19 2.2.4. Fence End Treatments ............................................................................................. 23 2.2.5. Access Road Treatments ......................................................................................... 25 2.2.6. Effectiveness in Reducing Collisions ..................................................................... 26 2.2.7. Wildlife Mortality as a Result of Wildlife Crashing into Fences ........................... 27 2.2.8. Landscape Aesthetics .............................................................................................. 28 2.2.9. Costs ........................................................................................................................ 28 2.2.10. Maintenance ........................................................................................................ 29 2.3. Allow Wildlife to Escape the Fenced Road Corridor .................................................... 30 2.3.1. General Considerations ........................................................................................... 30 2.3.2. Passive One-Way Gates .......................................................................................... 31 2.3.3. Active One-Way Gates ........................................................................................... 31 2.3.4. Wildlife Jump-outs or Escape Ramps ..................................................................... 32 2.3.5. Branches Stacked Against Fence ............................................................................ 33 2.3.6. Lower Fences with Outrigger ................................................................................. 33 2.4. Warn Drivers and Traffic Calming in Fenced Road Corridor ....................................... 34 2.4.1. Warning signs ......................................................................................................... 34 2.4.2. Traffic Calming ....................................................................................................... 36 2.5. Allow Humans to Get In and Out of the Fenced Road Corridor .................................... 36 2.5.1. General .................................................................................................................... 36 2.5.2. Non-Motorized Use (Pedestrians, Bicyclists, Equestrian) ...................................... 36 2.5.3. Motorized Use ......................................................................................................... 38 3. Survey ....................................................................................................................................40 3.1. Organization of Survey .................................................................................................. 40 3.2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 40 3.2.1. The Target Population............................................................................................. 40 3.2.2. Survey Development and Review ........................................................................... 41 3.3. Respondents ................................................................................................................... 42 3.4. Large and Medium-Sized Mammals .............................................................................. 46 3.4.1. Characteristics of the Respondents ......................................................................... 46 3.4.2. Measures to Keep Large and Medium-Sized Mammals Off the Road ................... 46 3.4.3. Allow Wildlife to Escape the Fenced Road Corridor ............................................. 55 3.4.4. Keep Wildlife Out of Fenced Road Corridor at Fence Gaps and Fence Ends ........ 59 3.4.5. Allow Humans to Get In and Out of the Fenced Road Corridor ............................ 64 3.4.6. At Grade Crossing Opportunities for Wildlife at Gaps or Fence Ends .................. 69 Western Transportation Institute Page 3 Wildlife Fencing and Associated Measures Table of Contents 3.5. Amphibians and Reptiles ............................................................................................... 76 3.5.1. Characteristics of the Respondents ......................................................................... 76 3.5.2. Measures to Keep Amphibians and Reptiles Off the Road .................................... 77 3.5.3. Allow Wildlife to Escape the Fenced Road Corridor ............................................. 85 3.5.4. Keep Wildlife Out Off Fenced Road Corridor at Fence Gaps and Fence Ends ..... 87 3.5.5. Allow Humans to Get In and Out of the Fenced Road Corridor ............................ 89 3.5.6. At Grade Crossing Opportunities for Wildlife at Gaps or Fence Ends .................. 93 3.6. Design Plans and Specifications .................................................................................... 96 3.6.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 96 3.6.2. Wire Mesh Fencing for Large Animals .................................................................. 97 3.6.3. Other Details ......................................................................................................... 112 3.6.4. Small Animals ....................................................................................................... 113 4. Cost-Benefit Analyses .........................................................................................................115 4.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 115 4.2. Methods ........................................................................................................................ 115 4.3. Results .......................................................................................................................... 118
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Safety Alert 21-01 (Pilot Transfer Arrangements) V1.0
    SAFETY ALERT 2021-01 Version No. 1 Issue Date 08/01/2021 Pilot transfer arrangements 1. Purpose 1.1. This Safety Alert is issued by The Bahamas Maritime Authority (BMA) to bring the results of the International Maritime Pilot Association (IMPA) Safety Campaign 2020 to the attention of seafarers, pilots, owners, managers and Classification Societies. 2. Introduction 2.1 IMPA represents the international community of pilots. It conducts an annual safety campaign with the objective of reporting pilots’ experiences of ladders and boarding equipment to the International Maritime Organization and the wider shipping community. This year’s campaign is especially relevant following the tragic death of two pilots, whilst attempting to board vessels using combination ladders, since the last campaign. 2.2 2020’s campaign received 6394 reports from pilots operating across the world. Broadly in line with previous years’ findings, 12.11% of arrangements were reported to be non- compliant with combination ladders and pilot ladders having the most defects by both number and percentage. SA 2021-01 SAFETY ALERT Page 1 of 4 SAFETY ALERT [YEAR CREATED]-01 3. Common defects 3.1 Broadly, reported defects can be categorised in to four areas: design, procedure, rigging and maintenance. 3.2 Procedural issues can be avoided through clear communication and implementation of requirements: 3.3 Defects identified in the rigging and maintenance of ladders are generally self- explanatory and can be reduced through an effective planned maintenance regime and consistent application of guidance: 3.4 Many of the common issues found with securing of pilot ladders are steps taken by crews as a way to work around constraints imposed by deck cargo, loading or other prevailing circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Code - Poland, Maine 2021
    Comprehensive Land Use Code - Poland, Maine 2021 Comprehensive Land Use Code For the Town of Poland, Maine Original Ratification April 28, 2001 Subsequent Enactment April 2, 2011 Amended April 2, 2021 - Page 1 of 262 – Comprehensive Land Use Code - Poland, Maine 2021 Chapter Directory CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVSIONS 16 CHAPTER 2 PLANNING BOARD 19 CHAPTER 3 ADMINISTRATIVE 21 CHAPTER 4 ENFORCEMENT 30 CHAPTER 5 LAND ZONING 33 CHAPTER 6 SUBDIVISION STANDARDS 151 CHAPTER 7 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT STANDARDS 196 CHAPTER 8 STREET & ROAD CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS 205 CHAPTER 9 ROAD & STREET ENTRANCE STANDARDS 217 CHAPTER 10 AUTO GRAVEYARDS, JUNKYARD, & RECYCLING 219 BUSINESS CHAPTER 11 BUILDING CODE STANDARDS 221 CHAPTER 12 FIRE PREVENTION & LIFE SAFETY CODE 223 STANDARDS CHAPTER 13 (RESERVED) N/A CHAPTER 14 DEFINITIONS 226 Chapter 15 MARIJUANA STANDARDS 252 APPENDIX A 258 - Page 2 of 262 – Comprehensive Land Use Code - Poland, Maine 2021 CHAPTER 1 – GENERAL PROVISIONS 101 Short Title 16 102 Purposes 16 103 Authority 16 103.1 Table of Contents & Index 16 104 Applicability 16 104.1 General 16 104.2 Municipal Authority Over State Projects 16 104.3 Municipal Authority Over Federal Projects 16 105 Effective Date 16 106 Validity and Severability 17 107 Conflicts Between Chapters and Other Ordinances 17 108 Repeal of Existing Ordinances 17 108.1 Subsequent Ordinances Repealed Since 4/28/2001 17 108.2 Repeal of Municipal Timber Harvesting 17 109 Amendments 17 109.1 Initiation of Amendments 17 109.2 Public Hearing 18 109.3 Adoption of Amendment 18 109.4 Shoreland
    [Show full text]
  • California Community Colleges the League for Innovation Career Ladders Research In
    Career Ladders Research in the California Community Colleges Presented to The League for Innovation Linda Collins Regina Stanback Stroud William Watson March 7, 2005 With Thanks To… o Board of Governors - California Community Colleges o Chancellor’s Office - California Community Colleges o David and Lucile Packard Foundation o Foothill-De Anza Career Ladders/Help Desk Project o Foundation for California Community Colleges o James Irvine Foundation o Walter and Elise Haas Fund o William and Flora Hewlett Foundation THE VISION o The community colleges are an effective and central part of a unified approach to workforce development in California—one that is founded on career ladders, universal, seamless, regional, strategic and collaborative. o All the components of the workforce development system are working together in an integrated fashion. A system of career ladders provides opportunity for all Californians to attain jobs that provide a living wage and to advance to positions requiring greater skills, responsibilities, and accordingly, higher pay. o Employer needs are better met, and workforce and economic development in California is enhanced by the increasing supply of skilled workers. (Ladders of Opportunity, BOG-CCC 2001) Career Ladders can help students: n Move within and across programs in the college n Move between the college and other educational institutions n Benefit from the multiple missions of the CCC’s – basic skills, vocational education, general education, and transfer n Move along educational and career pathways n
    [Show full text]
  • Right-Of-Way
    HD-1301 Chapter RIGHT-OF-WAY Subject General Information GENERAL: The procurement of right of way to widths that accommodate the construction, adequate drainage, and proper maintenance of the highway is a very important part of the overall project. Adequate right-of-way widths permit the construction of gentle slopes, resulting in more safety for the motorist and allowing easier and more economical maintenance. Traffic requirements, topography, environmental issues, utilities, land use, costs, intersection design, and extent of ultimate expansion influence the width of right of way for the complete development of a roadway. RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: Right of way should be of sufficient width to accommodate construction and the continued maintenance and operation of the facility. Avoiding right-angle breaks in the right-of-way line and irregularities in widths facilitates maintenance operations and fencing and optimizes land use. Consider the use of curb-and-gutter sections in urbanized areas for the reduction of right-of-way widths and compatibility with adjacent development. The use of right of way, permanent easements, and temporary easements should be determined on a site-specific basis in order to facilitate the construction, operation, and maintenance of the facility and adjacent land use. Typically, permanent right of way should be acquired to the back edge of the berm on curb-and-gutter projects with easements used for that portion beyond the right of way for construction, operation, and maintenance of drainage structures. EASEMENTS: It is common practice to use two types of easements on proposed highway projects: temporary and permanent. Temporary Easement—A temporary easement is the use of a tract of land for a specified time duration (typically the duration of construction), with the land reverting to the owner’s exclusive use at the end of the period.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 State of Utah Uniform Fine Schedule
    2021 UNIFORM FINE SCHEDULE INTENT It is the intent of the Uniform Fine Schedule to assist the sentencing judge in determining the appropriate fine to be imposed as a condition of the sentence in a particular case and to minimize disparity in sentencing for similar offenses and offenders. This schedule is not intended to supplant or to minimize a court’s authority to impose a just sentence. APPLICABILITY These guidelines shall apply to all courts of record and not of record whenever a criminal fine may be imposed. In determining whether a fine is appropriate to impose as a condition of the sentence for a public offense, a judge should consider several factors, including aggravating and/or mitigating circumstances set forth in the Sentencing And Release Guidelines, Tab 6, the cumulative effect of probation conditions, and the ability of the defendant to pay. The amounts listed in the Uniform Fine Schedule may be used as a starting point for setting monetary bail as a condition of pretrial release, however, an individual’s ability to pay must be considered consistent with Appendix J of the Code of Judicial Administration. In those parking, traffic, and infraction cases where the defendant is not required to appear and is mailed a citation indicating the fine amount, pursuant to Utah Code of Judicial Administration Rule 4-701, the amount may be increased $50 if the defendant fails to appear or to pay within fourteen days after receiving the citation. The amount may be increased by an additional $75 if the defendant fails to appear or to pay within forty days after receiving the citation.
    [Show full text]
  • 68: Protest, Policing, and Urban Space by Hans Nicholas Sagan A
    Specters of '68: Protest, Policing, and Urban Space by Hans Nicholas Sagan A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Galen Cranz, Chair Professer C. Greig Crysler Professor Richard Walker Summer 2015 Sagan Copyright page Sagan Abstract Specters of '68: Protest, Policing, and Urban Space by Hans Nicholas Sagan Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture University of California, Berkeley Professor Galen Cranz, Chair Political protest is an increasingly frequent occurrence in urban public space. During times of protest, the use of urban space transforms according to special regulatory circumstances and dictates. The reorganization of economic relationships under neoliberalism carries with it changes in the regulation of urban space. Environmental design is part of the toolkit of protest control. Existing literature on the interrelation of protest, policing, and urban space can be broken down into four general categories: radical politics, criminological, technocratic, and technical- professional. Each of these bodies of literature problematizes core ideas of crowds, space, and protest differently. This leads to entirely different philosophical and methodological approaches to protests from different parties and agencies. This paper approaches protest, policing, and urban space using a critical-theoretical methodology coupled with person-environment relations methods. This paper examines political protest at American Presidential National Conventions. Using genealogical-historical analysis and discourse analysis, this paper examines two historical protest event-sites to develop baselines for comparison: Chicago 1968 and Dallas 1984. Two contemporary protest event-sites are examined using direct observation and discourse analysis: Denver 2008 and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Enforcement & Legal Elements Necessary for Prosecution
    Partnership to Combat Critical Infrastructure Copper Theft Webinar Law Enforcement & Legal Elements Necessary for Prosecution February 28, 2012 Roxann M. Ryan, J.D., Ph.D. Iowa Department of Public Safety Division of Intelligence & Fusion Center The theft of copper and other precious metals is hardly new,1 although the targets have changed over time. As copper prices have reached all-time highs, burglars and thieves are accessing new sources of metal. The criminal charges available also have changed over time. In 2011, the Iowa legislature amended two statutes to specifically address the potential risk to public-utility critical infrastructure. What began as House File 299 during the 2011 Iowa legislative session became law on July 1, 2011. That legislation consisted of two primary initiatives: (1) Local ordinances are authorized.2 Municipalities and counties can pass ordinances to require salvage dealers to maintain complete records of their supplies. Failure to comply can result in a suspension or revocation of the salvage dealer’s permit or license. (2) Penalties are increased for trespass on public utility property.3 It is a class “D” felony to trespass on public utility property, which carries a sentence of up to 5 years in prison and a fine of $7500. The options for criminal charges include far more than these two additions. Copper thieves typically commit one or more of the following crimes: Burglary 713.6A. Burglary in the third degree 1. All burglary which is not burglary in the first degree or burglary in the The elements of Burglary are as second degree is burglary in the third degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Walls and Fences: a Journey Through History and Economics
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Vernon, Victoria; Zimmermann, Klaus F. Working Paper Walls and Fences: A Journey Through History and Economics GLO Discussion Paper, No. 330 Provided in Cooperation with: Global Labor Organization (GLO) Suggested Citation: Vernon, Victoria; Zimmermann, Klaus F. (2019) : Walls and Fences: A Journey Through History and Economics, GLO Discussion Paper, No. 330, Global Labor Organization (GLO), Essen This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/193640 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Walls and Fences: A Journey Through History and Economics* Victoria Vernon State University of New York and GLO; [email protected] Klaus F. Zimmermann UNU-MERIT, CEPR and GLO; [email protected] March 2019 Abstract Throughout history, border walls and fences have been built for defense, to claim land, to signal power, and to control migration.
    [Show full text]
  • Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum
    Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum Spring, 1998 8 Duke Env L & Pol'y F 209 ECONOMIC INCENTIVES AND LEGAL TOOLS FOR PRIVATE SECTOR CONSERVATION Ian Bowles, * David Downes, ** Dana Clark, *** and Marianne Guerin-McManus **** * Vice President and Director of Policy Department, Conservation International. ** Senior Attorney with the Center for International Environmental Law. *** Senior Attorney with the Center for International Environmental Law. **** Director of Conservation Finance Program, Conservation International. SUMMARY: ... At the same time, public concern about environmental issues like clean drinking water, overconsumption of natural resources, and worldwide loss of tropical forests has grown explosively and led policymakers to devote more attention to these issues. ... In most jurisdictions, a conservation easement is created when the landowner transfers some or all rights to develop the property to a government agency or qualified conservation non-governmental organization (NGO); the landowner can maintain certain uses but cannot legally take actions inconsistent with the terms of the conservation easement. ... To encourage donations of conservation easements, a number of jurisdictions specifically provide that a conservation easement qualifies as a charitable contribution, enabling a landowner to deduct its value from her taxable income. ... This provision has proven to be a significant incentive for conservation of biodiversity. ... One method for capturing at least some of the many costs of timber extraction is a user fee. ... Recreation, though not as destructive as extractive resource development, has environmental consequences. ... When a landowner donates a conservation easement, or enters into a conservation agreement, ensure that the landowner's property is taxed at a rate according to its current market value (its value subject to the easement or the agreement), rather than its potential development value.
    [Show full text]
  • Ladders – Issue Eight
    LADDERS The recruit newsletter of the South Euclid Fire Department Climbing to a career as a firefighter in the South Euclid Fire Department, one rung at a time. Issue Eight Your Resume Is your resume ready to go? Have you ever written a resume? In this issue we will discuss resumes, first working on items to put in the resume and then how to prepare the resume. A proper and well written resume will not help you advance your career unless it contains the experience and training employers are looking for. These qualifications can be worked on while you pursue your dream job. The focus must be on what makes you an exceptional candidate. You should work on your basic training first, fire school and medic school. Experience is very valuable, even if it is part time, volunteer or in a field related to firefighting. Even your non-fire education can be an asset. Degrees in fire related fields are preferred but even degrees in non-fire related fields show your strength in education. There are numerous opportunities for you to add to your resume. Consider on-line classes that are low cost or free. Work on other certifications such as fire inspector, instructor or arson investigation. All of these relevant items on your resume demonstrate your training, skills and passion for the job. Other items such as involvement in community organizations help the potential employer see that you care about the community. The actual resume is not hard to write. The internet is full of help and examples. Resumes should be easy to read, and contain only relevant information.
    [Show full text]
  • A Landowner's Guide to Fence Law in Texas
    EAG-029 1/17 A Landowner’s Guide to Fence Law in Texas Tiffany D. Lashmet James D. Bradbury Assistant Professor Partner, James D. Bradbury, PLLC and Extension Specialist Austin–Fort Worth Kyle K. Weldon Student, Texas A&M University School of Law ii Preface This book arose out of a late afternoon call from a rural county in Texas. Two landowners could not agree on a fencing question and called the county for help. The county judge called us, and after a few minutes of discussion regarding the question, we realized that Texas landowners need a field guide for fencing questions. The three of us work with Texas landowners, and we get more questions about fencing than any other topic. And, while there are thousands of miles of barbed wire across the state, we lack an easy-to-use resource to answer the everyday questions that arise between landowners. Another lengthy law book would not fit in the glove box of a pickup, so we kept this short and easy-to-follow. It may not answer every question, but it should cover most. And, remember, the law will never substitute for an understanding between two neighbors over a cup of coffee. iii iv Table of Contents iii Preface 1 Introduction 3 Liability for Livestock on the Roadway 3 Open Range vs. Closed Range 3 Local Stock Laws 7 U.S. and State Highways 9 Landowners and Emergency Responders 9 Road/Highway Liability Examples 11 Liability for Livestock on Neighboring Land 11 My neighbor’s cattle are on my land.
    [Show full text]
  • Fence Woven Wire (382B) Job Sheet
    Fence Woven Wire Conservation Practice Job Sheet RI- 382(b) Definition A constructed barrier to livestock, wildlife or people. Purpose This job sheet is provided as a component of a resource conservation plan. This practice may be applied to contain and control livestock and wildlife movement, facilitate a prescribed grazing system, protect sensitive areas from grazing livestock, and to eliminate access to unsafe areas. Conditions where practice applies This practice may be used on any area where a fence is needed to control access, movement and containment of livestock and wildlife and where people safety and movement is of concern. This job sheet is provided as a component of a resource conservation plan. Conservation plan maps showing the approximate fence location, complementary conservation practices, grazing schedule, other relevant information, and additional specifications may be included. General Criteria and Specifications All fence construction shall comply with federal, state, and local fencing codes. Practice Lifespan is 20 years. Fence line clearing Fence lines will be cleared of brush and trees; gullies and steep banks may require grading. Clearing along stream banks will be held to a minimum and no vegetation may be removed within the buffer area, except as required for stream crossings. Fencing materials shall be of a quality and durability that meets the intended management objectives. Construction shall be performed in a manner that meets the intended management objective. Wire and hardware will be new, galvanized material. Line post Maximum spacing between posts is 16.5 feet. All wooden line posts shall be set at least 30 inches into the ground.
    [Show full text]