DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Full Article in PDF Format

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Full Article in PDF Format On the biostratigraphy and cyclostratigraphy of the Moscovian Stage in the type area Marya Kh. MAKHLINA Geocentre Moscow, Varshavskoye shosse, 39a, 113105 Moscow (Russia) Marya N. SOLOVIEVA t & Natalia V. GOREVA Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevsky per., 7, 109017 Moscow (Russia) Makhlina M. Kh., Solovieva M. N. & Goreva N.V. 1997. — On the biostratigraphy and cyclostratigraphy of the Moscovian Stage in the type area, in Crasquin-Soleau S. & De Wever P. (eds), Peri-Tethys: stratlgraphic correlations, Ceodiversitas 19 (2) : 235-245. ABSTRACT Moscovian Stage deposits are widespread in Russia. The stage was established in 1890 by Nikitin. It is subdivised in four horizons: Vereya, Kashira, Podol'sk and Myachkovo. The subdivisions of the stage ate based on studies of brachipods, foraminifera, conodonts, ammonites, bivalves, rugosans and KEYWORDS Moscovian, plants. In this paper, new data are due to the cottection of the standatd sec­ Carboniferous, tion of the Moscovian Stage and its new interpretation. Cyclostratigtaphy biostratigraphy, analysis based on the geological history of the region and its eustatics is a new cyclostratigraphy, Moscow Syncline. aspect of the research presented in this paper. RESUME Les dépôts du Moscovien sont largemenr répandus en Russie. Cet étage a été défini en 1890 pat Nikitin. Il est subdivisé en quatre horizons : Vereya, Kashira, Podol'sk et Myachkovo. Les subdivisions de l'étage sont fondées sut l'étude des btachiopodes, foraminifères, conodontes, ammonites, bivalves, MOTS CLES Moscovien, rugueux et plantes. Dans cet article, les nouvelles données proviennent de la Carbonifère, révision de la coupe standard de l'étage et de ses nouvelles interprétations. biostratigraphie, cyclostratigraphie, L'analyse cyclostratigraphique fondée sur l'histoire géologique de la région et synclinal de Moscou. de son eustatisme est un nouvel aspect de la recherche présenté ici. GEODIVERSITAS • 1997 • 19(2) 235 Makhlina M. Kh., Solovieva M. N. t & Goreva N. V. The Moscovian Stage deposits as well as the were caused by the discovery of a gap in the stra- Middle Carboniferous ones as a whole are wides­ totype section of the Kashira Horizon, where pread in Russia and mineral deposits, including deposits of the Tsna unit, established by oil and gas, are rather common in these sedi­ Solovieva (1984, 1986) in the Tsna River basin ments. Subdivision and correlation of the (Ryazan-Saratov depression) in the eastern part Moscovian polyfacial deposits connected with of the Moscow Syneclise, ate absent. Cyclostrati- different climatic zones (subtropical and boreal) graphical analysis of the Moscovian Stage based represent the essential element of geological on the geological history of the region and its mapping and exploitation. Tendency to adequate eustatic tectonics is the new aspect of the resear­ reliability, precision of stratigraphic scales and ch presented in this paper. high degree of correlations achievement caused the necessity to reinvestigate of the stage and The Moscovian Stage in the type atea is represen­ substage stratotypes. ted by marine deposits, i.e. by continuous series The Moscovian Stage was established by Nikitin of transgressive deposits (130-150 m thick), in in 1890 in the vicinity of Moscow. The upper which sands and clays are gradually replaced by limit of the stage was defined at the base of clayey and pure limestones. Subhorizontal bed­ Gzhelian limestones. ding and cyclicity of deposits give opportunity to The Moscovian, accotding to the ideas of Ivanov identify and follow up horizons, formations and (1926) who had established the fundamental relatively small subdivisions (subformations and principles of the modern views on the volume of members) in this region, and to identify cycles of this stage and its subdivisions based on the stu­ diffetent order. dies of the depositional sequence in the southern If the Carboniferous system is considered to be a part of the Moscow Syneclise, was subdivided cycle of the third order, Middle and Upper into four horizons: Vereya, Kashira, Podol'sk and Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) are cycles of the Myachkovo. The Tegulifera Horizon (the fourth order. The Middle Carboniferous corres­ Kasimovian Stage) was considered to be a part of ponds to a tectono-eustatic cycle of the fifth the Upper Carboniferous. Faunal assemblages of order, the Moscovian and Kasimovian stages to the Moscovian as a whole, as well as those of its cycles of the sixth order (Table 1). According to subdivisions based on studies of brachiopods, Tikhomirov (1988), the latter includes the three foraminifers, conodonts, ammonites, bivalves, units corresponding to three phases of the trans­ rugosans, plants, ate relatively well known, zonal gression: initial (a), maximum (|3) and terminal, scales being established on the basis of some of or regressive phase (y). Cycles of the sixth order these studied groups. Numerous publications are may be complete or shortened, the former devoted to the Moscovian Stage in the type area, consisting of three cycles of the seventh order, which most important are those by Ivanov the lartet of two cycles of the same order, the ini­ (1926), Ivanova & Khvorova (1955), Rauser- tial phase being absent. These cycles could be Chernousova et al. (1951). Some papers are followed up in diffetent facies throughout a published during the last 20 years by Shik region, and their formation corresponds to the (1971), Makhlina (1972, 1976), Makhlina & maximum tectono-eustatic changes of basin Shik (1983), Makhlina et al. (1984), Goreva level. The Aza, Vereya and Tsna subdivisions (1984), Solovieva (1984, 1986). apparently correspond to the cycle of the seventh New data included in the present paper were order, or to the initial phase of the transgression obtained by the correction of the standard sec­ (oc) (Table 1). The combined Kashira, Podol'sk tion of the Moscovian Stage and its new inter­ and Myachkovo horizons correspond to the cycle pretation. of the seventh order, or to the maximum phase of the transgression ((3), whereas thtee horizons The lower boundary of the Moscovian Stage, of the Kasimovian Stage of the Upper according to the traditional views, coincides with Carboniferous correspond to a regressive phase the lower boundary of the Veteya Horizon. (y). Within the cycles of the seventh order thete Changes in the standard section interpretation 236 GEODIVERSITAS • 1997 • 19(2) Bio-cyclostratigraphy of the Moscovian Stage TABLE 1. — Subdivision of the Moscovician of the Russian Platform. Regional Local scale Cyclostratigraphy scale scale Moscow Syncllse order of cycles IX VIII VII VI V IV III Horizon Formation Subformation Member Horizon Substage m s m e (Formation) Stag Serie Syste Subsyste Voskresensk n r Krevyakino Krevyakino Suvorovo Krevyakino Krevyakinian V Uppe Kazimovia Myachkova Peski Peski Myachkovian C IN Novlinskoe Novlinskoe [33 10 Shchurovo Shchurovo T= o Podolsk Podol'sk Ulitino Ulitino Podolskian CD i— -c Vas'kino Vas'kino [32 CD CO CD Smedva Smedva Smedva > 5 > - Rostlslavl' O o >. c Lopasnya Lopasnya Lopasnya Kashirian ß o _l Kashira Kashira Khatum </> CO o Nara P1 o c cz Nara Polustova Nara Gora CD CO Tsna Tsna Tsnian? Q_ Ü a3 Upper Ordynka a Vereya Vereya Alyutovo Vereyan Lower Shat «2 Melekess Aza Aza a1 are smaller cycles - those of the eighth order, cor­ environments. Periodicity in the distribution of responding to separate horizons (substages in the faunal assemblages, which always show maxi­ proposed cyclostratigraphic scale, Table 1) and mum diversity in a transgressive part of a cycle those of the first order, corresponding to subfor­ and low diversity in its regressive part (Makhlina mations (horizons in the proposed cyclostrati­ & Shik 1983), is a characteristic feature of all graphic scale, Table 1). simultaneously formed polyfacial stratigraphie units corresponding to the cycles (Figs 1-3). Every stratigraphie unit of any rank can be sub­ Boundaries between these units correspond to divided into two parts: lower, corresponding to historico-geological changes of sedimentation the transgressive phase of sedimentation, and patterns, i.e. to changes in abiotic environment upper, corresponding to the regressive phase. taking place simultaneously in the whole region Contemporaneous stratigraphie units of different (Makhlina 1996). facies, which were formed in the paleobasin as a The main criteria for distinguishing and tracing lateral sequence of rocks reflect, near-shore, per- of transgressive-regressive cycles in which combi­ iferal, shallow-water and relatively deep-water nation form stratigraphie units (formations, sub- GEODIVERSITAS • 1997 • 19(2) 237 Makhlina M. Kh., Solovieva M. N. t & Goreva N. V. formations) are the following: sedimentological N. bassleri, Diplognathodus coloradoensis, and faunistic content, features of textute, perio­ D. orphanus, Streptognathodusparvus. dicity in the distribution of all groups of fauna in According to Solovieva (1984) and Alekseev the section, as well as biostratigtaphical characte­ (1994), the Vereya Formation sensu Ivanov ristics for the definition of the geological age of (1926) is only chatacterized by the Alyutovo the units. The sufficient methodical significance fusulinid and conodont assemblages. The over­ of the lithological-palaeoecological criteria, ela­ lying and underlying Shat and Ordynka mem­ borated by Osipova & Belskaya (1967), should bers (Table 1) do not contain any other faunistic be emphasized in this respect. complex except Alyutovo age. Leaving
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY and ... -.: Palaeontologia Polonica
    CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF THE PERTH LIMESTONE MEMBER, STAUNTON FORMATION (PENNSYLVANIAN) OF THE ILLINOIS BASIN, U.S.A. CARl B. REXROAD. lEWIS M. BROWN. JOE DEVERA. and REBECCA J. SUMAN Rexroad , c.. Brown . L.. Devera, 1.. and Suman, R. 1998. Conodont biostrati graph y and paleoec ology of the Perth Limestone Member. Staunt on Form ation (Pennsy lvanian) of the Illinois Basin. U.S.A. Ill: H. Szaniawski (ed .), Proceedings of the Sixth European Conodont Symposium (ECOS VI). - Palaeont ologia Polonica, 58 . 247-259. Th e Perth Limestone Member of the Staunton Formation in the southeastern part of the Illinois Basin co nsists ofargill aceous limestone s that are in a facies relati on ship with shales and sandstones that commonly are ca lcareous and fossiliferous. Th e Perth conodo nts are do minated by Idiognathodus incurvus. Hindeodus minutus and Neognathodu s bothrops eac h comprises slightly less than 10% of the fauna. Th e other spec ies are minor consti­ tuents. The Perth is ass igned to the Neog nathodus bothrops- N. bassleri Sub zon e of the N. bothrops Zo ne. but we were unable to co nfirm its assignment to earliest Desmoin esian as oppose d to latest Atokan. Co nodo nt biofacies associations of the Perth refle ct a shallow near- shore marine environment of generally low to moderate energy. but locali zed areas are more variable. particul ar ly in regard to salinity. K e y w o r d s : Co nodo nta. biozonation. paleoecology. Desmoinesian , Penn sylvanian. Illinois Basin. U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 03-Alekseev and Goreva (Neognathodus).P65
    Lucas, S.G., et al. eds., 2013, The Carboniferous-Permian Transition. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Bulletin 60. 1 THE CONODONT NEOGNATHODUS BOTHROPS MERRILL, 1972 AS THE MARKER FOR THE LOWER BOUNDARY OF THE MOSCOVIAN STAGE (MIDDLE PENNSYLVANIAN) ALEXANDER S. ALEKSEEV1 AND NATALIA V. GOREVA 2 1 Department of Paleontology, Geological Faculty, Moscow State University, Russia, email: aaleks@geol. msu.ru; 2 Geological institute of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia, email: [email protected] Abstract—The Moscovian Stage constitutes the Middle Pennsylvanian Series of the Carboniferous System, but a biostratigraphic marker and GSSP for it have not yet been designated. The exact position of the Moscovian boundary cannot be defined properly because in the type area the basal Vereian unconformably overlies the Mississippian limestone or the alluvial and lagoonal Aza Formation of the uppermost Bashkirian. The Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Bashkirian-Moscovian boundary suggested several potential markers among foraminifers and conodonts, but the search for a marker near traditional base of the global Moscovian Stage has stalled. It may be more productive to search for FADs in the lower Moscovian, above the traditional base, to designate the lower boundary of the stage. Relatively rich Vereian and Kashirian conodont assemblages have been recovered from the southwest Moscow Basin, as well as from the Oka-Tsna Swell. The most complete information on the distribution of conodonts in the Vereian- Kashirian boundary interval was obtained from the Yambirno section (Oka-Tsna Swell). The greatest change in conodont assemblages does not occur near the level of the traditional base of the Moscovian, but stratigraphically higher.
    [Show full text]
  • New Permian Fauna from Tropical Gondwana
    ARTICLE Received 18 Jun 2015 | Accepted 18 Sep 2015 | Published 5 Nov 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9676 OPEN New Permian fauna from tropical Gondwana Juan C. Cisneros1,2, Claudia Marsicano3, Kenneth D. Angielczyk4, Roger M. H. Smith5,6, Martha Richter7, Jo¨rg Fro¨bisch8,9, Christian F. Kammerer8 & Rudyard W. Sadleir4,10 Terrestrial vertebrates are first known to colonize high-latitude regions during the middle Permian (Guadalupian) about 270 million years ago, following the Pennsylvanian Gondwanan continental glaciation. However, despite over 150 years of study in these areas, the bio- geographic origins of these rich communities of land-dwelling vertebrates remain obscure. Here we report on a new early Permian continental tetrapod fauna from South America in tropical Western Gondwana that sheds new light on patterns of tetrapod distribution. Northeastern Brazil hosted an extensive lacustrine system inhabited by a unique community of temnospondyl amphibians and reptiles that considerably expand the known temporal and geographic ranges of key subgroups. Our findings demonstrate that tetrapod groups common in later Permian and Triassic temperate communities were already present in tropical Gondwana by the early Permian (Cisuralian). This new fauna constitutes a new biogeographic province with North American affinities and clearly demonstrates that tetrapod dispersal into Gondwana was already underway at the beginning of the Permian. 1 Centro de Cieˆncias da Natureza, Universidade Federal do Piauı´, 64049-550 Teresina, Brazil. 2 Programa de Po´s-Graduac¸a˜o em Geocieˆncias, Departamento de Geologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 50740-533 Recife, Brazil. 3 Departamento de Cs. Geologicas, FCEN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, IDEAN- CONICET, C1428EHA Ciudad Auto´noma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3.Pdf
    A Geoconservation perspective on the trace fossil record associated with the end – Ordovician mass extinction and glaciation in the Welsh Basin Item Type Thesis or dissertation Authors Nicholls, Keith H. Citation Nicholls, K. (2019). A Geoconservation perspective on the trace fossil record associated with the end – Ordovician mass extinction and glaciation in the Welsh Basin. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, United Kingdom. Publisher University of Chester Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Download date 26/09/2021 02:37:15 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/622234 International Chronostratigraphic Chart v2013/01 Erathem / Era System / Period Quaternary Neogene C e n o z o i c Paleogene Cretaceous M e s o z o i c Jurassic M e s o z o i c Jurassic Triassic Permian Carboniferous P a l Devonian e o z o i c P a l Devonian e o z o i c Silurian Ordovician s a n u a F y r Cambrian a n o i t u l o v E s ' i k s w o Ichnogeneric Diversity k p e 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 S 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 n 23 r e 25 d 27 o 29 M 31 33 35 37 39 T 41 43 i 45 47 m 49 e 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 Number of Ichnogenera (Treatise Part W) Ichnogeneric Diversity 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 n 23 r e 25 d 27 o 29 M 31 33 35 37 39 T 41 43 i 45 47 m 49 e 51 53 55 57 59 61 c i o 63 z 65 o e 67 a l 69 a 71 P 73 75 77 79 81 83 n 85 a i r 87 b 89 m 91 a 93 C Number of Ichnogenera (Treatise Part W)
    [Show full text]
  • Sequence Biostratigraphy of Carboniferous-Permian Boundary
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2019-07-01 Sequence Biostratigraphy of Carboniferous-Permian Boundary Strata in Western Utah: Deciphering Eustatic and Tectonic Controls on Sedimentation in the Antler-Sonoma Distal Foreland Basin Joshua Kerst Meibos Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Meibos, Joshua Kerst, "Sequence Biostratigraphy of Carboniferous-Permian Boundary Strata in Western Utah: Deciphering Eustatic and Tectonic Controls on Sedimentation in the Antler-Sonoma Distal Foreland Basin" (2019). Theses and Dissertations. 7583. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7583 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Sequence Biostratigraphy of Carboniferous-Permian Boundary Strata in Western Utah: Deciphering Eustatic and Tectonic Controls on Sedimentation in the Antler-Sonoma Distal Foreland Basin Joshua Kerst Meibos A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Scott M. Ritter, Chair Brooks B. Britt Sam Hudson Department of Geological Sciences Brigham Young University Copyright © 2019 Joshua Kerst Meibos All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Sequence Biostratigraphy of Carboniferous-Permian Boundary Strata in Western Utah: Deciphering Eustatic and Tectonic Controls on Sedimentation in the Antler-Sonoma Distal Foreland Basin Joshua Kerst Meibos Department of Geological Sciences, BYU Master of Science The stratal architecture of the upper Ely Limestone and Mormon Gap Formation (Pennsylvanian-early Permian) in western Utah reflects the interaction of icehouse sea-level change and tectonic activity in the distal Antler-Sonoma foreland basin.
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME 33 December 2017
    VOLUME 33 December 2017 Volume 33 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE’S COLUMN…………………………………………………………………..…….. 2 OBITUARY……………………………………………………………………………………..…5 SCCS REPORTS………………………………………………………………………………….7 ANNUAL REPORT TO ICS FOR 2016-2017…………………………………………………..….7 TASK GROUP REPORTS FOR 2016-2017 AND WORK PLANS FOR 2017 FISCAL YEAR………….11 Report of the task group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Viséan-Serpukhovian boundary…………11 Report of the task group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Bashkirian-Moscovian boundary………16 Report of the task group to establish the Moscovian-Kasimovian and Kasimovian-Gzhelian boundaries…....18 SCCS DOCUMENTS (CONTRIBUTIONS BY MEMBERS)…………………………………...……21 SHALLOW-WATER SIPHONODELLIDS AND DEFINITION OF THE DEVONIAN-CARBONIFEROUS BOUNDARY…………………………………………………………………………………….21 REPORT FOR PROGRESS FOR 2017 ACTIVITIES IN THE CANTABRIAN MOUNTAINS, SPAIN AND THE AMAZONAS BASIN, BRAZIL……………………………………………...………………26 TAXONOMIC AND STRATIGRAPHIC PROBLEMS CONCERNING THE CONODONTS LOCHRIEA SENCKENBERGICA NEMIROVSKAYA, PERRET & MEISCHNER, 1994 AND LOCHRIEA ZIEGLERI NEMIROVSKAYA, PERRET & MEISHCNER, 1994-CONSEQUENCES FOR DEFINING THE VISÉAN- SERPUKHOVIAN BOUNDARY………………………………………………………………………………...28 PROGRESS ON THE VISÉAN-SERPUKHOVIAN BOUNDARY IN SOUTH CHINA AND GERMANY……………………………………………………………………………………..35 POTENTIAL FOR A MORE PRECISE CORRELATION OF THE BASHKIRIAN AMMONOID AND FORAMINIFERAL ZONES IN THE SOUTH URALS…………………………………………..……42 CHEMOMETRICS AND CARBONIFEROUS MEDULLOSALEAN FRONDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR CARBONIFEROUS PHYTOSTRATIGRAPHY…………………………………………………...…45
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 83
    Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 83 (1993) Volume 102 p. 83-91 CONODONTS FROM COAL BALLS IN THE SPRINGFIELD COAL MEMBER OF THE PETERSBURG FORMATION (DESMOINESIAN, PENNSYLVANIAN) IN SOUTHERN INDIANA Carl B. Rexroad Indiana Geological Survey 611 North Walnut Grove Bloomington, Indiana 47405 ABSTRACT: A well-preserved and moderately diverse conodont faunule was recovered from five coal balls in the Springfield Coal Member of the Petersburg Formation from Peabody Coal Com- pany's Eby Pit, Lynnville Mine, in Warrick County, Indiana. The presence of Neognathodus roundyi and the other species recorded in this study is compatible with the middle Desmoinesian age of the Springfield. Idioprioniodus conjunctus is the most ecologically diagnostic of the conodonts and suggests organic-rich, quiet water with a low pH, which in turn suggests that the conodonts lived in a salt-water marsh bordered on one side by coal swamps and on another by near-normal marine waters. Apparently coal balls had multiple origins, and the origin of the conodont-bearing ones is uncertain. INTRODUCTION Because marine fossils are commonly associated with plant fossils in some coal balls, it is not surprising that conodonts have been reported from them. A half-dozen well-pre- served conodonts from Pennsylvanian coal balls from three different States were figured by Mamay and Yochelson (1962), but no other conodonts were figured; therefore, the overall conodont content in coal balls is unknown. To better understand the distribution of conodonts and their paleoecologic impor- tance in coal balls, samples were processed from coal balls of the middle Desmoinesian Springfield Coal Member of the Petersburg Formation from the Eby Pit of Peabody Coal Company's Lynnville Mine (SW'/4 , SWA, NE'A, Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon and Strontium Isotope Stratigraphy of the Permian from Nevada and China: Implications from an Icehouse to Greenhouse Transition
    Carbon and strontium isotope stratigraphy of the Permian from Nevada and China: Implications from an icehouse to greenhouse transition Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kate E. Tierney, M.S. Graduate Program in the School of Earth Sciences The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Matthew R. Saltzman, Advisor William I. Ausich Loren Babcock Stig M. Bergström Ola Ahlqvist Copyright by Kate Elizabeth Tierney 2010 Abstract The Permian is one of the most important intervals of earth history to help us understand the way our climate system works. It is an analog to modern climate because during this interval climate transitioned from an icehouse state (when glaciers existed extending to middle latitudes), to a greenhouse state (when there were no glaciers). This climatic amelioration occurred under conditions very similar to those that exist in modern times, including atmospheric CO2 levels and the presence of plants thriving in the terrestrial system. This analog to the modern system allows us to investigate the mechanisms that cause global warming. Scientist have learned that the distribution of carbon between the oceans, atmosphere and lithosphere plays a large role in determining climate and changes in this distribution can be studied by chemical proxies preserved in the rock record. There are two main ways to change the distribution of carbon between these reservoirs. Organic carbon can be buried or silicate minerals in the terrestrial realm can be weathered. These two mechanisms account for the long term changes in carbon concentrations in the atmosphere, particularly important to climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Number: 4008
    Paper Number: 4008 Characterization of conodont biostratigraphy in the basal Moscovian boundary interval at the Naqing section, Loudian, Guizhou, South China Lambert, L. L.1, Qi, Y. P.2, Nemyrovska, T. I.3, Wang, X. D.2, Hu, K. Y.2, and Wang, Q. L.2 1Geological Sciences, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA [email protected] 2State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, PR China 3Institute of Geological Sciences, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, O. Gonchar Str. 55-b, 01601 Kiev, Ukraine ___________________________________________________________________________ A major criterion for selecting a Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) is to demonstrate depositional continuity. Depositional continuity is most often accepted where there is a transitional morphocline from an ancestral species to its descendent. The GSSP is then selected to correspond with the phylogenetic first occurrence of the descendent species. Ideally, strata elsewhere are subsequently correlated with the GSSP using the local first appearance of the descendent species, or by other taxa associated with the GSSP providing supplementary biostratigraphic data. Any other stratigraphic methods can be used for correlation once the GSSP has been ratified by the International Union of Geological Sciences Commission on Stratigraphy. Multiple conodont lineages with complete transitional morphologies characterize the Bashkirian- Moscovian boundary interval in the Naqing section. The presence of all these chronoclines through the section demonstrates depositional continuity at Naqing, and provides numerous possible conodont- based levels available for selecting a basal Moscovian GSSP.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithostratigraphy, Microlithofacies, And
    Lithostratigraphy, Microlithofacies, and Conodont Biostratigraphy and Biofacies of the Wahoo Limestone (Carboniferous), Eastern Sadlerochit Mountains, Northeast Brooks Range, Alaska U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1568 j^^^fe^i^^t%t^^S%^A^tK-^^ ^.3lF Cover: Angular unconformity separating steeply dipping pre-Mississippian rocks from gently dipping carbonate rocks of the Lisburne Group near Sunset Pass, eastern Sadlerochit Mountains, northeast Brooks Range, Alaska. The image is a digital enhancement of the photograph (fig. 5) on page 9. Lithostratigraphy, Microlithofacies, and Conodont Biostratigraphy and Biofacies of the Wahoo Limestone (Carboniferous), Eastern Sadlerochit Mountains, Northeast Brooks Range, Alaska By Andrea P. Krumhardt, Anita G. Harris, and Keith F. Watts U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1568 Description of the lithostratigraphy, microlithofacies, and conodont bio stratigraphy and biofacies in a key section of a relatively widespread stratigraphic unit that straddles the Mississippian-Pennsylvanian boundary UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Published in the Eastern Region, Reston, Va. Manuscript approved for publication June 26, 1995. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Krumhardt, Andrea P. Lithostratigraphy, microlithofacies, and conodont biostratigraphy and biofacies of the Wahoo Limestone (Carboniferous), eastern Sadlerochit Mountains, northeast Brooks Range, Alaska / by Andrea P. Krumhardt, Anita G. Harris, and Keith F.
    [Show full text]
  • International Chronostratigraphic Chart
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2014/02 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Erathem / Era System / Period GSSP GSSP age (Ma) GSSP GSSA EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon GSSP age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 ~ 541.0 ±1.0 Holocene Ediacaran 0.0117 Tithonian Upper 152.1 ±0.9 Famennian ~ 635 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Neo- Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 850 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 Callovian 166.1 ±1.2 Quaternary Gelasian 2.58 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.62 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Langhian Sinemurian Proterozoic Neogene 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Hettangian 2050 Burdigalian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 28.1 Gorstian Oligocene Upper Norian 427.4 ±0.5 2500 Rupelian Wenlock Homerian
    [Show full text]
  • Paleogeographic Maps Earth History
    History of the Earth Age AGE Eon Era Period Period Epoch Stage Paleogeographic Maps Earth History (Ma) Era (Ma) Holocene Neogene Quaternary* Pleistocene Calabrian/Gelasian Piacenzian 2.6 Cenozoic Pliocene Zanclean Paleogene Messinian 5.3 L Tortonian 100 Cretaceous Serravallian Miocene M Langhian E Burdigalian Jurassic Neogene Aquitanian 200 23 L Chattian Triassic Oligocene E Rupelian Permian 34 Early Neogene 300 L Priabonian Bartonian Carboniferous Cenozoic M Eocene Lutetian 400 Phanerozoic Devonian E Ypresian Silurian Paleogene L Thanetian 56 PaleozoicOrdovician Mesozoic Paleocene M Selandian 500 E Danian Cambrian 66 Maastrichtian Ediacaran 600 Campanian Late Santonian 700 Coniacian Turonian Cenomanian Late Cretaceous 100 800 Cryogenian Albian 900 Neoproterozoic Tonian Cretaceous Aptian Early 1000 Barremian Hauterivian Valanginian 1100 Stenian Berriasian 146 Tithonian Early Cretaceous 1200 Late Kimmeridgian Oxfordian 161 Callovian Mesozoic 1300 Ectasian Bathonian Middle Bajocian Aalenian 176 1400 Toarcian Jurassic Mesoproterozoic Early Pliensbachian 1500 Sinemurian Hettangian Calymmian 200 Rhaetian 1600 Proterozoic Norian Late 1700 Statherian Carnian 228 1800 Ladinian Late Triassic Triassic Middle Anisian 1900 245 Olenekian Orosirian Early Induan Changhsingian 251 2000 Lopingian Wuchiapingian 260 Capitanian Guadalupian Wordian/Roadian 2100 271 Kungurian Paleoproterozoic Rhyacian Artinskian 2200 Permian Cisuralian Sakmarian Middle Permian 2300 Asselian 299 Late Gzhelian Kasimovian 2400 Siderian Middle Moscovian Penn- sylvanian Early Bashkirian
    [Show full text]