A Quantum Leap for AI

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Quantum Leap for AI TRENDS & CONTROVERSIES A quantum leap for AI By Haym Hirsh Rutgers University [email protected] November 1994 saw the near-simultaneous publication of two papers that threw the notion of computing on its head. On November 11, 1994, a paper by Leonard Adleman appeared in Science demonstrating that a vial of DNA fragments can serve as a computer for solving instances of the Hamiltonian path problem. Less than two weeks later, Peter Shor Quantum computing and AI presented a paper in Santa Fe, New Mexico, at the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations Subhash Kak, Louisiana State University of Computer Science, demonstrating how a quantum computer could be used to factor large Every few years, we hear of a new tech- numbers in a tractable fashion. Both these publications showed how nontraditional models nology that will revolutionize AI. After of computation had the potential to effectively solve problems previously believed to be careful reflection, we find that the advance intractable under traditional models of computation. However, the latter work, using a quan- is within the framework of the Turing tum model of computation proposed by Richard Feynmann and others in the early 1980s, machine model and equivalent, in many resonated well with AI researchers who had been coming to terms with Roger Penrose’s cases, to existing statistical techniques. But 1989 book The Emperor’s New Mind. In this book (and its sequel, Shadows of the Mind: A this time, in quantum computing, we seem Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness, which appeared in paperback form only a to be on the threshold of a real revolution— month before these papers), Penrose challenges the possibility of achieving AI via traditional a “quantum” leap—because it is a true “Turing-equivalent” computation devices, conjecturing that the roots of intelligence can be frontier beyond classical computing. But traced to macroscopic quantum effects in the brain. These two quantum strands form the will these possibilities be realized any time motivation for a small community of researchers exploring the topic of this issue’s “Trends soon? and Controversies” feature—the potential uses of quantum computing for AI. Classical computers work on classical Subhash Kak’s leadoff essay provides an excellent overview of the foundations of this area, logic and can be viewed as an embodiment explaining, for example, how a quantum computer makes it possible to manipulate an expo- of classical physics. Quantum computers, nential number of states in a search problem in a single clock step. He also discusses the philo- on the other hand, are based on the super- sophical motivations that have led people to explore the use of quantum computing in AI. positional logic of quantum mechanics, To the many with the widely held belief that tractable search is a core question in achieving which is an entirely different paradigm. AI, Tad Hogg’s essay explains how quantum computing can potentially form the basis for Conventional explanation sees conscious- tractable search on what have previously been considered intractable problems. One difficulty is ness arising as an emergent property of the that the “common” quantum computing approach of amplitude amplification can yield at most a classical computations taking place in the square-root improvement in an algorithm’s runtime. Hogg proposes mapping techniques com- circuits of the brain, but this does not ad- monly used in AI to the quantum computing world, specifically by using heuristics that embody dress the question of how thoughts and knowledge about the structure of a problem (such as the number of conjuncts satisfied by a truth feelings arise. If brains perform quantum assignment for a given satisfiability problem) within the search process. processing, this might be the secret behind Finally, Dan Ventura looks at the mutual benefits received by advances in the use of quan- consciousness. Furthermore, it might ex- tum computing for AI, for both AI researchers as well as those studying quantum computa- plain several puzzling features of animal tion. Attempting to apply quantum computing to AI problems might provide the right fodder and human intelligence and provide a new for researchers in quantum computing. Similarly, the use of quantum computing might direction to develop AI machines. In this enable new advances previously thought impossible within the AI community. Ventura also brief survey, I present the rationale for the discusses some of the difficulties that may lie ahead for those hoping to achieve AI through convergence between quantum computing quantum computing. Particularly important—as anyone who has attempted interdisciplinary and AI and discuss prospects for realizing research knows—is the (understandable) gap in motivations, background, and vocabularies the technology. of those working in these two fields. We are still quite far from having quantum computers sitting on our desktops running The weirdness of quantum Unix or Windows. However, as advances in quantum computing continue to be made, it is mechanics nice to know that researchers such as the authors in this issue’s “Trends and Controversies” Let me begin with the quantum frame- might already be coming to an understanding of how to effectively use the results of these work. It is a theory that provides a means advances. Indeed, their work might itself become responsible for these important advances of obtaining information about a system in in quantum computing as well. the microworld associated with various As a final note, this issue marks the passing of the cartoonist’s pen from Kevin Knight, attributes (component states). A quantum who has diligently served in this role for the last four years, to Sally Lee, who is responsible state is a linear superposition of its compo- for the cartoon appearing in this installment. Although we are sorry to see Kevin’s retirement nent states. Suppose the two component from this post, we are happy to have such an able successor. Thank you both Kevin and Sally. states are represented by |0> and |1>, which —Haym Hirsh could be the two spin states of an elemen- tary particle (up or down), or polarization JULY/AUGUST 1999 9 states of a photon (horizontal or nologies, such as NMR, trapped vertical), and so on. Then, the ions, quantum dots, and cavity general form of the superposi- quantum electrodynamics. Cur- tion state, |S>, will be rent problems with quantum computer technology include |S> = a |0> + b |1>. initialization, decoherence, and error correction. The weights, a and b,are The problem of initialization called probability amplitudes arises from a fundamental and are, in general, complex uncertainty in the phase of the numbers, subject to the condi- state. This uncertainty can ren- tion that |a|2 + |b|2 = 1. The mod der the techniques for strength- squares of the probability ampli- ening of the desired state use- tudes, |a|2 and |b|2, are the proba- less. Decoherence is the bilities of obtaining either of the inability to completely shield two component states upon the quantum system from observation. unpredictable interaction with The fact that the amplitudes are the environment, causing the Schrödinger’s computer. —Sally O. Lee complex numbers implies that a state function to lose its super- quantum system cannot be effec- position; decoherence times range tively simulated by the Monte Carlo method trix. The algorithm designer must first find from a fraction of a second to a few hun- using random numbers. You cannot run a the unitary matrix for the given computing dred seconds. Techniques for error correc- physical process if its probability amplitude problem and then map the matrix into a tion of quantum bits have been proposed, is negative or complex! sequential product of smaller matrix opera- but these work under very artificial and Apart from this, the counterintuitive tions that can be implemented relatively unrealistic assumptions.3 nature of quantum mechanics arises from easily. The fact that a quantum computa- the fact that, upon interaction with a mea- tion is nothing more than matrix multipli- Quantum computing at the basis of surement apparatus, the linear superposition cation of a certain kind should give comfort biological information processing quantum state reduces to one of its compo- to computer scientists—in operational The case that quantum computing is at nent states with the appropriate probability. terms, it is not weird at all! the basis of biological information process- This aspect of quantum mechanics renders A quantum computer exploits the inher- ing and, consequently, the explanation for the framework nonlinear—and irreversible ent parallelism that is provided by the the power of animal intelligence, relies on if the time variable is changed in sign. superposition of the quantum state. A quan- the following elements: For decades, philosophers of science have tum register with n binary cells is able to agonized over the many bizarre implications store 2n sequences simultaneously, in con- • Philosophical. The argument is that, at of quantum mechanics, such as that an or- trast to a classical register, which can store the deepest level of description nature, is ganism can be both dead and alive before it only 1 of the 2n sequences at a time. By its quantum-mechanical. The world of is observed (Schrödinger’s cat paradox), the ability to simultaneously process very mathematics, as a product of the human present can influence the past (Wheeler’s many problems, the quantum computer mind, sits on
Recommended publications
  • Does the Family Cap Influence Birthrates? Two New Studies Say 'No'
    Issues & Implications Cash Increase No ‘Incentive’ The New Jersey and the Arkansas Does the Family Cap studies raise serious questions about the validity of family cap propo- Influence Birthrates? nents’ primary rationale for the policy—the notion that an increase Two New Studies Say ‘No’ in monthly benefits upon the birth of a new baby acts as an incentive By Patricia Donovan for welfare recipients to have more children. When the Arkansas Contrary to early claims that a cap on when the researchers controlled for researchers asked a subsample of benefits would reduce birthrates the age and race of the nearly 8,500 the women studied whether they among welfare recipients, recent stud- women studied. would have another child in order to ies in New Jersey and Arkansas con- receive higher benefits, fully 100% of clude that denying an increase in The researchers also examined state those subject to the cap and more cash assistance to women who have Medicaid data to assess whether the than 95% of those in the control another child while on welfare has family cap had any impact on abor- group said they would not. Many did had no effect on births in these states. tion rates among women on welfare. not know how much more money Some antiabortion advocates have they would receive if they had In response to the findings, New feared that a cap could result in more another child. Jersey officials now insist that the abortions among welfare recipients, family cap was never intended to but the analysis indicates otherwise. “It appears that women do not make reduce births, but simply to encour- Like birthrates, abortion rates in New decisions about the birth of their age welfare recipients to make Jersey declined both among women children based on the addition of responsible decisions about child- subject to the cap and among the $42 per month in…benefits,” the bearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard C. Brower, Boston University with Many Slides from Kate Clark, NVIDIA
    Past and Future of QCD on GPUs Richard C. Brower, Boston University with many slides from Kate Clark, NVIDIA High Performance Computing in High Energy Physics CCNU Wahan China, Sept 19, 2018 Optimize the Intersection Application: QCD Algorithms: Architecture: AMG GPU Question to address • How do we put Quantum Field on the computer? • How to Maximize Flops/$, bandwidth/$ at Min Energy? • How to implement fastest algorithms: Dirac Sovlers, Sympletic Integrators, etc ? Standard Lattice QCD Formulation i d3xdt[ F 2 + (@ iA + m) ] Path Integral = 2A(x) (x) e− g2 µ⌫ µ µ − µ D Z R 1.Complex time for probability it x ! 4 iaAµ 2. Lattice Finite Differences (@µ iAµ) (x) ( x+ˆµ e x)/a − ! − d d e xDxy(A) y Det[D] 3. Fermionic integral − ! Z Det[D] dφdφ e φx[1/D]xyφy 4.Bosonic (pseudo- Fermions) ! − Z ij 1 γµ Lattice Dirac (x) − U ab(x) (x +ˆµ) ia 2 µ jb Color Dimension: a = 1,2,3 μ=1,2,…,d Spin i = 1,2,3,4 x x+ ➔ µ axis 2 x SU(3) Gauge Links ab ab iAµ (x) Uµ (x)=e x1 axis ➔ Quarks Propagation on Hypercubic Lattice* • Dominate Linear Algebra : Matrix solver for Dirac operator. • Gauge Evolution: In the semi-implicit quark Hamiltonian evolution in Monte vacuum Carlo time. u,d,s, proto u, • Analysis: proto d * Others: SUSY(Catteral et al), Random Lattices(Christ et al), Smiplicial Sphere (Brower et al) Byte/flop in Dirac Solver is main bottleneck • Bandwidth to memory rather than raw floating point throughput. • Wilson Dirac/DW operator (single prec) : 1440 bytes per 1320 flops.
    [Show full text]
  • American Leadership in Quantum Technology Joint Hearing
    AMERICAN LEADERSHIP IN QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY & SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 24, 2017 Serial No. 115–32 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 27–671PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HON. LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas, Chair FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas DANA ROHRABACHER, California ZOE LOFGREN, California MO BROOKS, Alabama DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon BILL POSEY, Florida ALAN GRAYSON, Florida THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky AMI BERA, California JIM BRIDENSTINE, Oklahoma ELIZABETH H. ESTY, Connecticut RANDY K. WEBER, Texas MARC A. VEASEY, Texas STEPHEN KNIGHT, California DONALD S. BEYER, JR., Virginia BRIAN BABIN, Texas JACKY ROSEN, Nevada BARBARA COMSTOCK, Virginia JERRY MCNERNEY, California BARRY LOUDERMILK, Georgia ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado RALPH LEE ABRAHAM, Louisiana PAUL TONKO, New York DRAIN LAHOOD, Illinois BILL FOSTER, Illinois DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida MARK TAKANO, California JIM BANKS, Indiana COLLEEN HANABUSA, Hawaii ANDY BIGGS, Arizona CHARLIE CRIST, Florida ROGER W. MARSHALL, Kansas NEAL P. DUNN, Florida CLAY HIGGINS, Louisiana RALPH NORMAN, South Carolina SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY HON. BARBARA COMSTOCK, Virginia, Chair FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois ELIZABETH H.
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Alexandria Smith
    [email protected] Bellandra B. Foster, Ph.D., P.E. Phone: 336.355.7897 QUALIFICATIONS SUMMARY Years of Experience Licensed professional engineer and program manager with extensive civil and 31 construction engineering experience. Manager and administrator of numerous projects within public agencies and private industry and as Founder and President of an engineering corporation. Professional Registrations EDUCATION Licensed Professional Engineer: Doctor of Philosophy, Civil Engineering State of Georgia Michigan State University – December 1999 State of Illinois Traffic and Transportation Engineering Seminar State of Michigan Northwestern University – June 1999 State of No. Carolina Certification - Transportation Systems (ITS) State of Ohio University of Michigan - September 1992 Master of Science Degree, Civil Engineering Professional Wayne State University – May 1989 Certifications Bachelor of Science Degree, Civil Engineering U.S. Small Business Michigan State University – August 1983 Administration Emerging 200 (E200) CIVIL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE Class of 2011 BBFoster Consulting, P.C. (8/2014-Present) President– BBFoster Consulting, PC provides civil engineering, program management, Level 1 Erosion and Sedimentation Control coaching, contract administration, utility coordination and compliance assistance. Inspector BBF ENGINEERING SERVICES, P.C. (4/94-12/2014) President and Principal Engineer – Founder and Owner of BBF Engineering Services, Professional P.C. The company provided civil engineering, project
    [Show full text]
  • Leading in a Complex World
    LEADING IN A COMPLEX WORLD CHANCELLOR WILLIAM H. MCRAVEN’S VISION AND FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF REGENTS, NOVEMBER 2015 BOARD OF REGENTS Paul L. Foster, Chairman R. Steven Hicks, Vice Chairman Jeffery D. Hildebrand, Vice Chairman Regent Ernest Aliseda Regent David J. Beck Regent Alex M. Cranberg Regent Wallace L. Hall, Jr. Regent Brenda Pejovich Regent Sara Martinez Tucker Student Regent Justin A. Drake GENERAL COUNSEL TO THE BOARD OF REGENTS Francie A. Frederick As of November 2015 Chancellor’s Vision TABLE OF CONTENTS 02 Letter from Chairman Paul L. Foster 04 Letter from Chancellor William H. McRaven 05 Introduction 07 UT System’s Mission Statement 09 Operating Concept 11 Agile Decision Process 13 Strategic Assessment 17 Framework for Advancing Excellence 19 Team of Teams 23 Quantum Leap: The Texas Prospect Initiative 25 Quantum Leap: The American Leadership Program 27 Quantum Leap: Win the Talent War 29 Quantum Leap: Enhancing Fairness & Opportunity 31 Quantum Leap: The UT Health Care Enterprise 33 Quantum Leap: Leading the Brain Health Revolution 35 Quantum Leap: The UT Network for National Security 37 Quantum Leap: UT System Expansion in Houston 39 Conclusion & Ethos Office of the BOARD OF REGENTS During my time as a UT System Regent, and most recently as chairman of the board, I have witnessed many great moments in the history of our individual institutions and significant, game-changing events for our system as a whole. No single event has left me more optimistic about the future of The University of Texas System than Chancellor William H.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Information Science Activities at NSF
    Quantum Information Science Activities at NSF Some History, Current Programs, and Future Directions Presentation for HEPAP 11/29/2018 Alex Cronin, Program Director National Science Foundation Physics Division QIS @ NSF goes back a long time Wootters & Zurek (1982) “A single quantum cannot be cloned”. Nature, 299, 802 acknowledged NSF Award 7826592 [PI: John A. Wheeler, UT Austin] C. Caves (1981) “Quantum Mechanical noise in an interferometer” PRD, 23,1693 acknowledged NSF Award 7922012 [PI: Kip Thorne, Caltech] “Information Mechanics (Computer and Information Science)” NSF Award 8618002; PI: Tommaso Toffoli, MIT; Start: 1987 led to one of the “basic building blocks for quantum computation” - Blatt, PRL, 102, 040501 (2009), “Realization of the Quantum Toffoli Gate with Trapped Ions” “Research on Randomized Algorithms, Complexity Theory, and Quantum Computers” NSF Award 9310214; PI: Umesh Vazirani, UC-Berkeley; Start: 1993 led to a quantum Fourier transform algorithm, later used by Shor QIS @ NSF goes back a long time Quantum Statistics of Nonclassical, Pulsed Light Fields Award: 9224779; PI: Michael Raymer, U. Oregon - Eugene; NSF Org:PHY Complexity Studies in Communications and Quantum Computations Award: 9627819; PI: Andrew Yao, Princeton; NSF Org:CCF Quantum Logic, Quantum Information and Quantum Computation Award: 9601997; PI: David MacCallum, Carleton College; NSF Org:SES Physics of Quantum Computing Award: 9802413; PI:Julio Gea-Banacloche, U Arkansas; NSF Org:PHY Quantum Foundations and Information Theory Using Consistent Histories Award: 9900755; PI: Robert Griffiths, Carnegie-Mellon U; NSF Org:PHY QIS @ NSF goes back a long time ITR: Institute for Quantum Information Award: 0086038; PI: John Preskill; Co-PI:John Doyle, Leonard Schulman, Axel Scherer, Alexei Kitaev, CalTech; NSF Org: CCF Start: 09/01/2000; Award Amount:$5,012,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Fiction on American Television
    TV Sci-Fi 16 + GUIDE This and other bfi National Library 16 + Guides are available from http://www.bfi.org.uk/16+ TV Sci-Fi CONTENTS Page IMPORTANT NOTE................................................................................................................. 1 ACCESSING RESEARCH MATERIALS.................................................................................. 2 APPROACHES TO RESEARCH, by Samantha Bakhurst ....................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION by Sean Delaney ......................................................................................... 6 AMERICAN TELEVISION........................................................................................................ 8 SCIENCE FICTION ON AMERICAN TELEVISION ................................................................. 9 AUDIENCES AND FANS......................................................................................................... 11 ANDROMEDA ......................................................................................................................... 12 BABYLON 5 ............................................................................................................................ 14 BATTLESTAR GALACTICA................................................................................................... 17 FARSCAPE ............................................................................................................................. 19 THE IRWIN ALLEN QUARTET • VOYAGE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SEA.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Leap” Truancy and Dropout Prevention Programs Mount Anthony Union High School, Bennington Vermont
    Final Evaluation Report “Quantum Leap” Truancy and Dropout Prevention Programs Mount Anthony Union High School, Bennington Vermont Monika Baege, EdD Susan Hasazi, EdD H. Bud Meyers, PhD March 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Purpose of the Study............................................................................................................1 Methodology........................................................................................................................3 Qualitative Findings.............................................................................................................5 Program Descriptions......................................................................................................5 Views and Experiences of Stakeholders.........................................................................6 Fostering Self-Determination.....................................................................................6 Variety of Supportive Programs ................................................................................9 Utilizing Experiential Learning ...............................................................................14 Vital Connection with Bennington College and the Larger Community ................21 Inspired and Collaborative Leadership Focused on Individual Relationships.........25 Stakeholders’ Additional Advice for Replication, Sustainability, Improvements........27
    [Show full text]
  • 7Th Annual LEAP Texas Conference
    7th Annual LEAP Texas Conference March 29-31, 2020 Hilton Houston North LEAP Texas Conference Committee ................................................................................................ 6 Plenary Speakers ............................................................................................................................. 7 Sponsor Presentations .................................................................................................................... 8 Pre-Conference Workshops .......................................................................................................... 10 Plenary and Concurrent Sessions ................................................................................................. 16 Monday, March 30, 2020 .......................................................................................................... 16 Tuesday, March 31, 2020 .......................................................................................................... 27 Sponsor Advertisements ............................................................................................................... 31 4 Dr. Jeff Roberts, Chair Sam Houston State University Mr. Blair Alexander Texas A&M University Dr. Chris Duke San Jacinto College Dr. Jannette Flores Cedar Valley College Dr. Larry King Stephen F. Austin State University Dr. Rebecca Lewis The University of Texas at Arlington Dr. Glenn Sanford Sam Houston State University Dr. Amy Harris Tan Houston Community College Ms. Arnita Williams The University
    [Show full text]
  • A Chirality-Based Quantum Leap: a Forward-Looking Review Arxiv
    A Chirality-Based Quantum Leap: A Forward-Looking Review Clarice D. Aiello,∗,y,z Muneer Abbas,{ John Abendroth,x Amartya S. Banerjee,k,y David Beratan,? Jason Belling,y,# Bertrand Berche,@ Antia Botana,4 Justin R. Caram,# Luca Celardo,r Gianaurelio Cuniberti,yy Arezoo Dianat,yy Yuqi Guo,zz Rafael Gutierrez,yy Carmen Herrmann,{{ Josh Hihath,xx Suneet Kale,kk Philip Kurian,?? Ying-Cheng Lai,## Ernesto Medina,@@ Vladimiro Mujica,kk Ron Naaman,44 Mohammadreza Noormandipour,y,z Julio Palma,rrr Yossi Paltiel,y y y William Petuskey,kk Jo~aoCarlos Ribeiro-Silva,z z z Dominik Stemer,y,k Ana Valdes-Curiel,y,z Solmar Varela,{{{ David Waldeck,xxx Paul S. Weiss,y,k Helmut Zacharias,kkk and Qing Hua Wang∗,zz E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] y California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 90095 z Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Los An- geles, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 90095 arXiv:2009.00136v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 31 Aug 2020 { Department of Microbiology, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA, 20059 x Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 94305 k Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 90095 1 ? Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA, 27708 # Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 90095 @ Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie Thoriques, UMR Universit´ede Lorraine-CNRS,
    [Show full text]
  • RACSO Motion Pictures Announces Next Project
    CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER ALLEN PRESS RELEASE 317.418.4841 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE [email protected] RACSO Motion Pictures Announces Next Project INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. – *Award Winning Filmmaker Christopher Allen has announced the title of his company’s next film production, a fan based effort to re-launch the popular “Quantum Leap” television series that ran on NBC from 1989 to 1993. Indianapolis based RACSO Motion Pictures is targeting 2008 as to when principal photography will begin. “Whenever people hear of a fan based effort, or fanfilm, they immediately think of a high school kid with mom and dad’s hand held video camera. This is clearly not the case.” said Allen from his studio in Carmel, Indiana. “My last fan effort (award winning Star Trek vs. Batman) opened more doors for my career than everything else prior to it. No one should underestimate the capability of what fan based films can do, if done professionally.” Allen will enlist a wide array of Indianapolis talent to help continue the story of Dr. Sam Beckett, who ironically is from a fictitious town in Indiana. Once completed, Allen hopes to use “Quantum Leap: A Leap to Di for” to persuade the science fiction broadcasting networks to re- launch the popular franchise. “I hope that the story is what will ensure the film’s acceptance by the fans. It centers on Dr. Beckett’s journey to 1997, where he is presented with the likelihood of saving the life of Princess Diana.” Allen said. “That one possibility is something I believe everyone can identify with.” Allen went on to add.
    [Show full text]
  • Horacio Torres B
    Horacio Torres b. 1924 Livorno, Italy - d. 1976 New York City Of the many painters who studied with his father, the great Constructivist artist Joaquín Torres-García, Horacio Torres made the quantum leap into the Contemporary art world of abstract and expressionistic painters in New York's 1970s. That he did so with figurative canvases was a singular achievement. Taken under the wing of the critic Clement Greenberg, who understood that Horacio's work was really about painting and was thoroughly modern, Horacio explored the thunderous territory of Titian, Velasquez and late Goya with a unique background of skill and aesthetic education in a contemporary way. Thus the series of headless nudes and of figures with faces obscured, make clear his painterly intentions and concerns. His monumental canvases are wondrous exercises of painted imagination formed with the structure of the depicted figure, but they are not about nudes, they are about painting. Public Collections Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York Museum of Modern Art, New York Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, Washington, D.C. Davis Museum, Wellesley College, Massachusetts Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Massachusetts Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, Texas Brandeis University Museum, Waltham, Massachusetts Hastings College, Nebraska Rhode Island School of Design Museum, Providence, New York Musée d’Art Moderne, Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris, France Edmonton Museum, Alberta, Canada Biblioteca Nacional, Montevideo, Uruguay Museo Blanes, Montevideo, Uruguay Main Solo Exhibitions (partial listing) 2017 Horacio Torres: Nudes, Cecilia de Torres, Ltd., New York 2016 Horacio Torres: Early Works, Cecilia de Torres, Ltd., New York 1999 Salander-O’Reilly Gallery, New York Cecilia de Torres, Ltd.
    [Show full text]